No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Medical Center Convalescent Hospital

467 E Gilbert St, San Bernardino, CA 92404 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (909) 884-4781 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (909) 884-4781 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 34 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1500 N Waterman Ave · (909) 381-1591 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1700 N Waterman Ave · (909) 883-3088 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2094 Wall Ave · (909) 672-9133 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1376 N Waterman Ave · (909) 381-3264

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.0%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.2%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.5%11.2%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.64
RN hoursweekends
28.4%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 77.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere with established food safety and sanitation standards when:1. A plastic wrapped container of beef roast was observed without a label indicating the preparation date, freeze by date, or discard date.2. Clean wet dishes were stacked on top of each other and not air dried.These had the potential to place susceptible residents who receive food from Dietary Services at risk for food-borne illnesses.Findings: 1. During an initial observation tour of the kitchen and interview, on 2/23/26, at 8:20 AM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), a plastic wrapped container of beef roast was observed in the walk-in freezer, without a label indicating the preparation date, freeze by date, or discard date.During an interview on 2/23/26 at 8:24 AM with the DS, the DS stated that the facility's policy was to ensure all food stored in the freezer was properly labeled and dated. The DS confirmed the facility's policy was not followed.A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Storage, revised 12/14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 17) did not self-administer medication, when the facility assessment indicated Resident 17 was unable to do so. Resident 17 was given medications to self-administer while out on pass ([OOP] a temporary, authorized absence from a medical facility for social, family, or therapeutic reasons, with the explicit requirement that they return for continued treatment from the facility). This failure had the potential for Resident 17 to have adverse effects.Findings:A review of Resident's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information) dated 2/25/26 indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A review of Resident 17's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/18/25, indicated Resident 17 had a surrogate decision maker and was noted to have confusion in the Neurological Exam portion. The H&P also indicated Resident 17 had diagnoses including right sided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible for use for one of one sampled resident (Resident 2).This failure had the potential for Resident 2's care needs not being met. Findings:During an observation on 2/23/26 at 9:20 AM inside Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was observed sitting up in bed. Resident 2's call light was observed on the floor to the left side of Resident 2's bed. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) was observed exiting Resident 2's room.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/23/26 at 9:50 AM with LVN 1 inside Resident 2's room, Resident 2's call light was observed on the floor to the left side of Resident 2's bed. LVN 1 verified the call light was not within Resident 2's reach and acknowledged it should have been accessible. LVN 1 stated Resident 2 was at risk for falls and having the call light within reach was important for Resident 2 to request assistance.A review of Resident 2's admission Record, (a document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the survey binder (a binder containing the results of the most recent survey which includes the Statement of Deficiencies (Form CMS-2567) which contains any deficiencies resulting from a complaint investigation or recertification survey) was readily accessible to the residents and visitors. This failure had the potential to limit residents' and visitors' ability to review the facility's compliance history and make informed decisions regarding care and services. Findings:During an interview on 2/24/26 at 1:30 PM at the Resident Council meeting, the residents were asked if they were able to review the results of the survey without having to ask a staff member. All 10 residents were present (Resident 4, Resident 6, Resident 16, Resident 27, Resident 34, Resident 37, Resident 38, Resident 62, Resident 65, and Resident 75) during the meeting and stated they did not know where the survey binder was located.During an observation on 2/24/26 at 2:30 PM, on the wall across from the nurses' station, a plastic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information concerning the right to formulate an Advance Directive (a written document specifying an individual's medical care wishes) for 4 of 14 sampled residents (Residents 1, 11, 49, 83).This failure had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options not being honored.Findings:1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information) dated 2/24/26, indicated Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 1's POLST, (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment-a form that documents an individual's preferences for end-of-life care), dated 5/10/24 was signed by the legally Recognized Decisionmaker and indicated Resident 1 did not have an Advance Directive. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/24/26 at 3:56 PM with the Social Services Designee (SSD), Resident 1's POLST was verified and the SSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASARR] - a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) to determine the resident's needs for specialized services and appropriate placement for one of one sampled resident (Resident 6).This failure had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for Resident 6. Findings:A review of Resident 6's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information), indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder depressive type (a mental health condition that combines symptoms of Schizophrenia [a mental disorder causing hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking]) with major depressive episodes (a mood disorder that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) with an indwelling urinary catheter (a catheter inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) had accurate intake and output (I&O) monitored and documented as ordered.This failure had the potential to result in delayed identification of changes in urinary output, fluid imbalance, and other complications related to the use of an indwelling catheter.Findings:During an observation on 2/23/26 at 9:02 AM inside Resident 3's room, Resident 3 was observed lying in bed with an indwelling urinary catheter in place.A review of Resident 3's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information), dated 2/25/26, indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/26/25, indicated Resident 3 had diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia ([BPH] - enlarged prostate gland causing obstruction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of three residents (Residents 17, 25, and 84) were kept free from accident hazards. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident 17 was properly assessed to be safe prior to sending the resident out on pass ([OOP] - a temporary, authorized absence from a medical facility for social, family, or therapeutic reasons, with the explicit requirement that they return for continued treatment from the facility.) 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident 25's had a physician order for floor mats and failed to implement care plan interventions. 3. The facility failed to identify and assess Resident 84 as a smoker upon admission and was observed smoking in the patio without a smoking assessment. These failures posed a risk for an unsafe environment for the residents. Findings:1. A review of Resident 17's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information), dated 2/24/26, indicated the resident was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) with an indwelling urinary catheter (a catheter inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) received proper care and services by failing to ensure indwelling catheter care was consistently completed and documented as ordered. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 developing a urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) and other complications related to the use of an indwelling catheter. Findings: During an observation on 2/23/26 at 9:02 AM inside Resident 3's room, Resident 3 was observed lying in bed with an indwelling urinary catheter in place.A review of Resident 3's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information), dated 2/25/26, indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/26/25, indicated Resident 3 had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services when:1. For one of four residents (Resident 84), a medication was not administered in accordance with prescriber's orders.This failure resulted in a medication error and the potential to result in unnecessary medications.2. In one of two medication rooms (Medication Room A), four normal saline (saltwater) IV (intravenous - into a resident's vein) solution bags were stored undated outside the plastic overwrap.This failure had the potential to compromise the stability of the IV solution bags.3. In one of two medication rooms refrigerators (Medication Room A), two opened and undated multiple-dose Aplisol (tuberculin purified protein derivative - aid to diagnose the tuberculosis infection) vial was observed stored in the medication refrigerator.This failure had the potential for the resident(s) to be exposed to ineffective Aplisol due to possible oxidation (chemical process) and degradation (reduced quality) which may affect potency (effectiveness) if the opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication labeling practices and medications were stored at the proper temperature range in accordance with accepted standards of practice and/or manufacturer's instructions when:1. One of one opened inhaler mouthpiece for Resident 36 was not properly labeled with sufficient information to clearly identify the specific resident.This failure had to potential to cause medication errors and preventable infections from cross-contamination (transfer of germs) if accidently mixed up with other residents' similar or same drugs.2. Medications were observed stored at the incorrect temperature.a. An undated insulin (drug to manage high blood sugars) pen (portable device) for Resident 39 in one of three medication carts.b. Two medication cartons containing bisacodyl (laxative drug to manage constipation) in one of two medication rooms refrigerators.This failure had the potential for residents to be given deteriorated (reduced quality) medications if stored outside the temperature range specified by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to maintain an accurate Medication Administration Record ([MAR] - a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 17) when the facility indicated Resident 17 was hospitalized , while the resident was out on pass ([OOP] - a temporary, authorized absence from a medical facility for social, family, or therapeutic reasons, with the explicit requirement that they return for continued treatment from the facility).This failure had the potential for omission of necessary medications.Findings:A review of Resident 17's admission Record, (a document showing a summary of the resident's information) dated 2/24/26, indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A review of Resident 17's Release for Temporary Absence form undated, indicated Resident 17 departed the facility on 2/24/26 at10:08 AM.During an observation on 2/25/26 at 8:10 AM Resident 17 was not in the room and the bed was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper and safe infection control practices were followed when: 1. In the laundry room, two dryers were set below the facility policy requirement of 180 degrees Fahrenheit (°F- unit of measurement), to comply with infection control, on February 5, 2025. 2. Resident 192's Intravenous (IV- flexible tube used to give fluids, medicine, or nutrients through a vein) tubing was not dated as per facility policy. These failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) causing a preventable infection to 71 highly vulnerable residents whose health conditions are already compromised. Findings: 1. During an observation on February 5, 2025, at 2:45 PM, with the Maintenance Director (MD), in the laundry room, the facility's two dryers were inspected. Both dryers were set to a medium setting (range of 140°F to 170°F). The temperature of each dyer was measured using an infrared thermometer (also known as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper management and disposal of expired medications was being implemented when: 1. One expired bisacodyl (used to treat constipation- when a person cannot poop) suppository (solid form of medications that dissolve inside the body) was found in the medication storage room and was available for use. 2. One expired alginate dressing (absorbent wound care product) was found in the treatment cart and was available for use. These failures had the potential for the dressing and medication to not be effective or safe for resident use in 71 highly susceptible medically compromised residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 5), on February 2, 2025, at 10:37 AM, the medication storage room was inspected. One bisacodyl suppository dated January 2025 was found inside the medication refrigerator. (One month expired) LVN 5 confirmed it was expired and stated it should not have been available for use. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to store food in a way that conserves nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, when cups of pudding, which were designated to be used during medication pass (process of delivering and administering medications to residents at scheduled times) were not accurately dated to reflect when it was prepared. This failure had the potential for staff to serve outdated pudding to residents, which could lead to dissatisfaction. (Each day, two residents receive pudding as a snack, while 68 residents potentially receive pudding during the medication pass.) Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), on February 3, 2025, at 8:05 AM, in the kitchen, a tray containing 18 cups of 4-ounce (oz- unit of measurement) servings of pudding was inside the kitchen refrigerator. A piece of paper taped on the tray indicated, 2/2/25 [February 2, 2025]. The individual cups of pudding were not dated. The DS explained the date on the tray indicates when an item was prepared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their restorative nursing services (RNS; also known as RNA program; nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible; generally initiated when a resident is discharged from formalized rehabilitation therapy) policies and procedures were being implemented for one of three residents reviewed for position and mobility (Resident 61) when Resident 61 was not placed on the RNS program after his Physical Therapy (PT- medical treatment that uses physical techniques to help people regain movement and function after an injury or disease) treatment was completed. This failure had the potential for Resident 61 to be at risk for falls, further decline in ambulation, and a loss of independence. Findings: During a review of Resident 61's health record, the admission Record (which contains demographic and medical information) indicated that Resident 61 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the regulatory requirement to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible when a resident (Resident 1) accidentally released a bear spray ( a spray which is twice as concentrated as pepper spray, a chemical can cause burning pain, watery eyes, and coughing upon contact with skin or eyes) which affected five other residents (Residents 2 , 3, 4 ,5 and 6) on July 23, 2024. This failure resulted in Residents 2 , 3, 4, 5 and 6 to experience red, watery eyes and coughing. Residents 2, 3, 5, and 6 required hospitalizations. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (mental health conditions that cause excessive fear or worry), restlessness and agitation (mean feeling uneasy or upset, making it hard to stay still or calm down). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-05 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a full-time qualified Dietary Services Supervisor, who was responsible for overseeing daily food production for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. This failure led to sanitation issues in the kitchen (cross-reference F-tag 812), staff who were not competent (cross-reference F-tag 802), deficiencies with food palatability when kitchen staff were using disposable dishware for resident meals (cross reference F-tag 804), and had the potential to affect 92 medically compromised residents at nutrition risk who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour observation and interview, on May 2, 2023, at 8:50 AM, with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 stated the facility did not have a Dietary Services Supervisor. During an interview, with the Director of Nursing (DON), on May 2, 2023, at 11:35 AM, the DON stated the former Dietary Services Supervisor quit on April 24, 2023, via text message. During a review of an undated facility provided copy of a printed text message, it indicated, Good morning,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and serve food that conserved flavor and appearance and was an appetizing temperature when: 1. A 20-pound box of carrots was stored in the freezer, open and unsealed, and was available for use. 2. In the cooking area, there was a container with onions sprouting and growing mold, and potatoes that were sprouting, and was available for use. 3. Residents were served lunch on May 2, 2023, on Styrofoam take-out containers and with plastic utensils These failures had the potential to cause 92 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen not to enjoy their food which could affect their nutrition status. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen tour observation, on May 2, 2023, at 8:33 AM, there was a 20-pound open box of frozen carrots in the freezer. It was open, unsealed, and was available for use. During an interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD), on May 4, 2023, at 12:25 PM, the RD stated all food should be sealed before being placed in the freezer. During a review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary condition in the kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. Three-compartment sink was not sanitizing dishes. It required 200 ppm (part per million- unit of measurement) of quaternary ammonia (chemical used to kill bacteria, viruses, and mold). The test was conducted and resulted to 100 ppm of quaternary ammonia. 2. The stainless steel shelf, used to store clean metal pans, had a sticky residue and food crumbs. 3. The floor, under the stainless steel shelves, had dirt, food crumbs, and black grime. 4. Three cupcake pans, stored on a shelf, had black burn residue and were available for use. These failures had the potential for microorganism growth that could be inadvertently transferred to the food of 92 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview, in the kitchen, on May 2, 2023, at 8:55 AM, the three-compartment sink was inspected. A Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) tested its'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection (establishment of an infective agent in or on a suitable host, producing clinical signs and symptoms) control practices were being implemented when: 1. The facility did not follow their policy and procedure for Legionella (bacteria that can cause a lung infection) water management program when the last results found were from March 25, 2020 (approximately 25 months ago). 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4) did not perform hand hygiene after checking Resident 44's blood sugar level. 3. LVN 1 did not perform hand hygiene when she provided Residents 26's wound care treatment. 4. LVN 1 did not perform hand hygiene when she provided Resident 289's wound care treatment. 5. Resident 290's oxygen tubing was found on the floor of her room. These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection to 92 highly vulnerable residents whose health conditions were already compromised. Findings: 1. During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate completion of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) for one resident (Resident 3) reviewed for PASARR . This failure had the potential for Resident 3 not to receive the care and services she needs due to her not being evaluated further. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's clinical record, the admission Record (contains personal demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental disorder), and schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder). During a concurrent interview and record review, with the Registered Nurse (RN), on May 4, 2023, at 2:44 PM, the RN reviewed Resident 3's PASARR Status Change Level 1 screening,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of wound care treatment refusals for one of four residents (Resident 82) reviewed for skin conditions when Resident 82 refused his treatments for three consecutive days (May 1, 2023 through May 3, 2023). This failure had the potential for Resident 82 to be at risk of increased infection, poor wound healing, hyperglycemia (elevated sugar levels in blood), and/or re-hospitalizations. Findings: During a review of Resident 82's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information indicated Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of burn of second degree of left foot (involves the top skin and parts of the dermis layer of skin), second degree of right foot (involves the top skin and parts of the dermis layer of skin), diabetes mellitus (an abnormal level of blood sugar), and pain. During a concurrent observation and interview, on May 3, 2023, at 2:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder) removal policy and procedure was implemented for one of three residents reviewed for urinary care when Resident 76's urinary catheter was removed without a physician's order. This failure had the potential for Resident 76 to be at risk of urinary retention (inability to completely empty the urinary bladder by urinating.) Findings: During a review of Resident 76's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 76 was admitted to facility on October 1, 2022, with diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy (occurs when urine cannot drain through urinary tract, and presence of urogenital implants (a way to help treat stress incontinence due to a weak sphincter). During a review of Resident 76's physician's order, dated April 10, 2023, it indicated Resident 76 had an order for Indwelling catheter (a type of urinary catheter) . attached to gravity drainage bag for obstructive reflux…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status (factors that reflect that an individual ' s nutritional status is adequate, relative to his/her overall condition and prognosis, such as weight, food/fluid intake, and pertinent laboratory values) for one of six residents (Resident 51) reviewed for nutrition, when the nutrition interventions recommended by the Registered Dietitian were not implemented for Resident 51. This failure had the potential for Resident 51, a medically compromised individual, to be at risk of impaired wound healing and weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's clinical record, the admission Record indicated Resident 51 was admitted in April 25, 2023 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (medical condition in which person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis), pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four (deep wound reaching the muscles, ligaments, and/or bones), and pressure induced deep tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe oxygen administration were provided for one of three residents (Resident 32) reviewed for respiratory care when: 1. Resident 32's oxygen therapy order was not carried out as prescribed by the physician. 2. Resident 32's oxygen tubing (a device which facilitates oxygen delivery) was not labeled to indicate the date when it was changed. These failures had the potential to result in a decline in Resident 32's oxygen status, causing shortness of breath, oxygen toxicity (too much oxygen), respiratory infection, and lung damage. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 32's clinical records, the admission Record (containing demographic information), indicated Resident 32 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), dependence on supplemental oxygen (additional oxygen), and pneumonia (inflammation in the lungs that makes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to the facility's policies and procedures for two of 13 residents (Resident 33 and 77) reviewed for medication administration observation when: 1. Resident 33 had an order to receive Sevelamer (medication to treat high levels of phosphorus). The medication was not available for administration. 2. Resident 77 refused to receive Pantoprazole (a medication to treat acid reflux). It was documented as administered. These failures had the potential for Residents 33 and 77 to not be administered prescribed medication and increased the resident's risk for adverse reactions and side effects. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 33's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, end stage renal disease (condition in which kidneys cannot longer function on their own)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy recommendation identified from the Drug Regimen Review (DRR- thorough evaluation of a resident's medication regimen to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities) was followed up in accordance with federal regulations, for one of five residents (Resident 66) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident 66 had an order to receive Xanax (medication to treat anxiety) as needed. The Consultant Pharmacist reviewed her medications and recommended for it to be limited for 14 days. This failure had the potential for Resident 66 to receive unnecessary medication and had unrecognized adverse reactions. Findings: During a review of Resident 66's clinical records, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 66 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroy memory and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was less than five percent. There were two medication errors identified out of 29 opportunities for errors, affecting two of 13 residents (Residents 33 and 77), resulting in an overall medication error rate of 6.9 percent when: 1. Resident 33 had an order to receive Sevelamer (medication to treat high levels of phosphorus). The medication was not available for administration. This failure had the potential for Resident 33 to have increased levels of phosphorus in the blood which could lead to low calcium which may cause muscle cramps. 2. Resident 77 refused to receive Pantoprazole (a medication to treat acid reflux). It was documented as administered. This failure had the potential for Resident 77's health care needs towards his acid reflux not being addressed. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 33's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have dietary staff with appropriate competencies when: 1. Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) did not know how to check the quaternary ammonia (chemical used to kill bacteria, viruses, and mold) level of the three-compartment sink (3 sinks, one for each step of the ware wash procedure, wash, rinse and sanitize) and the quaternary ammonia level was not the correct concentration. 2. Dietary Aide 2 (DA 2) did not know how to check the chlorine level of the dish machine. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) for a medical compromised population of 92 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, with Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) and [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, on May 2, 2023, at 8:55 AM, (DA 1) checked the quaternary ammonia level of the three -compartment sink. DA 1 dipped the quaternary test strip in the water and immediately compared it to the vile color code, it was 100 ppm (parts per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hospice (specialized end-of-life care for all patients with a terminal illness with a prognosis of 6 months or less) care was coordinated in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for one of two residents (Resident 23) reviewed for hospice, when there was no current hospice recertification (the certification and recertification regulations require a physician certify the patient is terminally ill with a prognosis of 6 months or less) and current plan of care available in Resident 23's health record. This failure had the potential for Resident 23 not to receive hospice care services based on a comprehensive person-centered care plan. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of heart failure (a condition in which the heart is no longer able to pump oxygen-rich blood to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their bed inspection policy were implemented for two of seven residents (Residents 12 and 69) reviewed for accidents when: 1. For Resident 12, her bed had a 10-centimeter (cm- unit of measurement) gap between the mattress bed and footboard. 2. For Resident 69, her bed had a 15-centimeter gap between the mattress and the footboard. These failures had the potential to place Residents 12 and 69 at risk for entrapment (being caught between the mattress and bed rail), falls, and injuries. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 12's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (a condition where the body does not produce enough insulin), delusional disorders (person cannot tell what is real from what is not), abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility, and anxiety (feeling of fear or uneasiness).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call systems for two of three shower rooms (Shower Rooms A and B) were accessible and functional. This failure had the potential to place 92 residents at risk of harm, as residents experiencing an emergency or needing assistance would not be able to call for help. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on May 5, 2023, at 10:58 AM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), at Shower Room B (SRB- located in the southeast corner of the facility), SRB had one toilet and one shower. Both toilet and shower call lights were inoperable when pulled to activate, as no light indicator was visible over SRB doorway to alert staff. The call light cord in the shower was not accessible to a resident lying on the floor. The IP stated a resident on the floor would not be able to reach the call light for the shower. The IP further stated the expectation was that the call lights were accessible and working properly. During an observation, on May 5, 2023, at 11:07 AM, with the IP, at Shower Room A (SRA-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program (measures to eradicate and contain common household pests e.g., bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitoes, flies, mice, and rats) when the presence of pests in the facility within the last year were not reported to the Maintenance Supervisor as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 92 highly vulnerable residents through the direct and indirect exposure to the contaminants the cockroach may carry. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on May 4, 2023, at 7:00 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4), a live cockroach jumped under Bed B. LVN 4 stated That [cockroach] was a big one I hate cockroaches. During an interview, on May 4, 2023, at 8:15 AM, with LVN 3, LVN 3 stated she has had seen a cockroach in the facility within the last year. During an interview, on May…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVA CARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHEN, JENQIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 03/01/2009
CHEN, TZE-YUNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2009
PADAMA, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/02/2017
DIOLOSA, FRANCISCOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/20/2021
HAGE, JEANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$885K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 4%Other / private 12%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $885K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$358per resident / day
operating cost
$10,877per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$317per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056436. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next