Montclair Manor Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 45.1 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide medical records to the party responsible for one of four residents (Resident 1) in a timely manner, in accordance with the facility policy. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 1 ' s rights which had the potential for Resident 1 ' s responsible party to experience psychosocial harm (mental harm and suffering). Findings During a concurrent interview and record review, on April 15, 2025, at 2:30 PM, with the Medical Records Director (Director), the facility ' s AUTHORIZATION FOR THE RELEASE OF CLINICAL INFORMATION, the authorization indicated, on March 19, 2025, the responsible party requested medical records. This information is verified and confirmed by the director. Director stated the party responsible was provided with the current records after 3 (three) days upon request; however, not all requested records were given. During a concurrent interview and record review on April 30, 2025, at 1:31 PM, the Director stated records should be provided within 72 hours upon request. During review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe, sanitary food preparation, and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. The ice machine had yellow grime (dirt clinging to or rubbed into a surface) in the ice chute (a passage, often filled with ice). This had the potential for contribution of microorganism (tiny living things like bacteria, fungi and algae that are too small to be seen with the naked eye) growth. 2. The floor under the reach-in refrigerator had a black grime and trash. This had the potential of pathogenic (something that can make you sick like germs or viruses) microorganisms to accumulate and attract pests. 3. Inside the refrigerator, the chicken was thawing (to unfreeze) over another set of meat. This had the potential of cross-contamination (contamination between two things). These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness (a condition that occurs when a person consumes food or beverages contaminated with harmful microorganisms, toxins, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest (insect or animal such as rodents that can spread disease) control program when in the kitchen, a closet, used to store paper goods (paper cups, paper plates, napkins, etc.), had missing drywall. The hole caused by the missing drywall was covered by a metal mesh wire (a net like material that has holes) cover. This failure had the potential of making an entry for pests and causing food contamination for 54 medically compromised residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation on April 1, 2025, at 8:03 AM, in the kitchen's storage area, a closet, used to store paper goods, had a hole in the wall. Upon further inspection, it was noted that the hole was from a missing drywall. The hole was covered with a metal wire mesh. The openings between the metal mesh wire were about ½ inch wide. During an interview on April 3, 2025, at 10:38 AM, with the Registered Dietician (RD), the RD stated the expectation was for all walls to be intact. The RD acknowledged it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered therapeutic diets (special meal plans, made for people with health problems) were provided to three of 11 residents (Residents 34, 48, and 41) reviewed for dining observation when: 1. Residents 34 and 48 did not receive their physician ordered cardiac diet (low sodium, low fat diet). 2. Resident 41 did not receive the prescribed therapeutic diet for lunch on April 1, 2025. These failures had the potential to cause nutritional decline and unmet care needs for Residents 41, 34 and 48. Finding: 1. During a review of a facility document titled Order Listing Report [contains the resident's diet], it indicated Residents 34 and 48 had therapetic diets of .Regular Cardiac (Low fat, Low sodium), CCHO (Consistent Carbohydrate) NAS (No added Salt) with meals. During an interview on April 2, 2025, at 8:40 AM, with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), the DSS stated they do not provide the cardiac diet at the facility. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their daily approved menu for lunch on April 1, 2025, and April 2, 2025, when: 1. On April 1, 2025, Dietary [NAME] 1 (Cook 1), served puree (food that has been blended, pressed or ground to have a creamy texture) lasagna with #8 scoop (1/2 cup). The menu indicated the portion should be 1 cup. 2. On April 1, 2025, [NAME] 1, for the large portion orders served 1 ½ of lasagna. The menu indicated that it should be 1 ½ garlic bread not lasagna. 3. On April 2, 2025, Dietary [NAME] 2 (Cook 2), for the mechanical soft (foods that are easily swallowed) orders served #16 scoop (¼ cup). The menu indicated the portion should be #10 scoop (3/8 cup). These failures had the potential to compromise resident's nutritional status, when menus were not followed for 18 of 55 medically compromised residents (on puree, on large portion, or mechanical soft diets) who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a review of a facility document titled Orders Listing Report [contains the resident's diet], it indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's electronic health records (EHR- medical records kept on a computer system) were kept private and protected from public view for one of nineteen sampled residents (Resident 22) when the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) left Resident 22's EHR unattended, visible and viewable to the hallway at the nursing station. This failure had the potential to place Resident 22 at risk for her medical records to be viewed by other residents or healthcare providers who should not have access to Resident 22's medical records. Findings: During an observation on April 3, 2025, at 8:46 AM, there was no nurse at the nursing station. There was one computer facing the hallway, with the EHR open and viewable to the public. The computer screen showed Resident 22's weights. Upon further inspection, the person who accessed Resident 22's EHR was the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). During a concurrent observation and interview, on April 3, 2025, at 8:53 AM, in the nursing station, with the ADON, the ADON logged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan (specific interventions to provide effective and person-centered care to meet the resident's needs) was updated in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for one of four residents (Resident 41) reviewed for nutrition. This failure had the potential for Resident 41 to be at risk for continued nutritional decline, delayed interventions and unmet care needs related to weight loss and associated medical conditions. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (a condition where the body has trouble using sugar properly, causing high blood sugar levels), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). During a review of Resident 41's Weight Changes Note, dated February 21, 2025, at 3:29 PM, it indicated, Resident noted to have 16 lbs. (pounds) / 13.3% weight loss x 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their catheter (tube that is inserted into your bladder, allowing your urine to drain freely) care policy and procedure was implemented for one of two residents (Resident 11) reviewed for catheter. This failure had the potential to place Resident 11 at risk for developing urinary infection (when bacteria enters and infects the urinary tract). Findings: During a review of Resident 11's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hydroureter (a muscular tube that transports urine from the kidneys to the bladder, gets bigger than normal due to a backup of urine) caused by any blockage that prevents urine from draining into the bladder, chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where the kidneys do not work as well as they should) and obstructive, and reflux uropathy (flow of urine is blocked). During a review of Resident 11's physician's order,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate and arrange the dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood) appointment for one of one resident (Resident 36) reviewed for dialysis. This failure had the potential to place Resident 36 at risk of complications due to fluid overload (body has too much water). Findings: During a review of Resident 36's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 36 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis) and diabetes (blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 36's physician's order, dated March 15, 2025, it indicated Will have an extra dialysis on March 17, 2025, per dialysis center due to fluid overload. During a concurrent observation and interview, with Resident 36, on April 4, 2025, at 9:07 AM, in Resident 36's room, Resident 36 was sitting on her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were accommodated for one of four residents (Resident 11) reviewed for nutrition when Resident 11 was served green beans for lunch on April 1, 2025. This failure had the potential to result in unmet care of needs for Resident 11 which could potentially affect the resident's nutrition status. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic systolic heart failure (a long-term condition where the heart struggles to pump blood effectively), depression (a persistent mood disorder characterized by a sustained feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and muscle wasting (the loss of muscle mass and strength). During an interview, with Resident 11, in Resident 11's room, on April 1, 2025, at 12:03 PM, Resident 11 stated she often gets served food that does not accommodate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVA CARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA