No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Empress Care Center, LLC

1299 S. Bascom Avenue, San Jose, CA 95128 · For profit - Individual · 67 certified beds · (408) 287-0616 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (408) 287-0616 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Oct 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
900 E Hamilton Ave · (408) 371-7111 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
902 S Bascom Ave · (408) 293-9033 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1290 S Bascom Ave · (408) 292-0878 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Los Gatos Creek Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1210 S Bascom Ave · (650) 326-7737

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.4%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%93.2%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.232.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.041.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.0%CMS range 42.0–67.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 7.5–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay6.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.6–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.61
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
32.7%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 48.8 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-28)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-22)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0700 — widespread
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed 1. To complete the bed rail entrapment assessment for 48 of 48 residents (1, 28, 8, 3, 26, 14, 5, 25, 99, 37, 19, 24, 15, 44, 2, 13, 6, 10, 33, 32, 42, 249, 39, 31, 36, 250, 21, 4, 251, 252, 23, 20, 38, 199, 40, 46, 34, 30, 17, 11, 18, 29, 9, 7, 22, 12, 27, and 200); 2. To attempt alternatives measures for 6 of 48 residents (4, 33, 44, 99, 249, and 250) prior to implementing the bed rails; and 3. To complete the bed rail care plan for one of 48 residents (40). These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk of entrapment and serious injury. Findings: 1. During observations on 4/21/25, from 9:25 a.m. to 10:52 a.m., Residents 13, 6, 10, 33, 32, 42, 249, 39, 31, 36, 250, 21, 4, 251, 252, 23, 20, and 38 had bilateral bed rails up. Review of Residents' 13, 6, 10, 33, 32, 42, 249, 39, 31, 36, 250, 21, 4, 251, 252, 23, 20, and 38 clinical records indicated they did have the entrapment assessments completed for the use of bed rails.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure palatability and nutritive value of cooked foods were maintained when: 1.Two of forty-nine facility residents (Residents 12 and 4), receiving food from the kitchen, complained that the food tasted bland (lacking taste or flavor); and 2. Regular (no modifications to food texture or consistency) oven barbecue roast beef and pureed foods (smooth, thick liquid or paste made by crushing or grinding solid foods and often made using a food processor and has a consistency that's thicker than juice) were held in the heated oven for an extended period. These failures resulted in decreased food palatability that could lead to decrease in food consumed by residents, and the food held in the heated oven for extended period could lose nutritive value, that could lead to decreased nutrient intake for the forty-nine facility residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During the concurrent observation and interview of Resident 12 during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. There were unsanitary cooking equipment in the kitchen; 2. A bucket of corrosive chemical was kept beside the food utensils; 3. Ice scoop for the ice machine was placed in the area near the ice machine that was accessible to everyone; and 4. Kitchen staff was not observing hand hygiene and sanitation during the tray line preparation. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of micro-organisms which could cause foodborne illness (illness resulting from contaminated food) and cross-contaminated food for the forty-nine residents who received foods from the facility kitchen. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour observation with cook I (COOK I), on 4/21/25 at 8:46 a.m., observed 3 large pans with brownish to blackish discolorations and rusty spots in them. During the interview with COOK I on 4/21/25 at 8:47 a.m., COOK I acknowledged that the 3 large pans had brownish to blackish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-28 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the license of the administrator (ADM) was current when the ADM was working as the facility's administrator without supervision after his license was expired more than 10 days. This failure violated the state licensure requirements for nursing home administrator (NHA). Findings: Review of the ADM's NHA license indicated his license expired on [DATE]. Review of the ADM's proof of renewal indicated he wrote the check for his renewal application on [DATE]. During an interview with the ADM on [DATE], at 5:25 p.m., he confirmed that his NHA license expired on [DATE]. During observations from [DATE] to [DATE], the ADM was working as the facility's administrator without supervision by a licensed NHA. Review of the facility's job description and performance standards, Administrator, dated [DATE], indicated one of the required qualifications was to possess a current unencumbered license as NHA with the State of California. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy and procedure (P&P) was followed for an advance directive (AD: a written instructions, such as a living will or durable power of attorney that authorizes to act on behalf of resident for healthcare when the individual is incapacitated) for six of eight sampled residents (Resident 6, 20, 23, 31, 42, and 249). This failure could lead to the delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate medical services against sampled resident's goals and wishes. Findings: Review of Resident 6's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 6 was admitted to facility on 4/18/2016. Review of Resident 6's form for physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST: a document that specifies the medical treatments the resident wants to receive during serious illness) form prepared on 4/19/2016 indicated section D for AD documented No Advance Directive. Further review of Resident 6's clinical record indicated there was no documented evidence for facility discussed for AD or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant G (CNA G) did not sanitized her hands before feeding Resident 3; 2. Certified Nursing Assistant H (CNA H) grabbed the door knob of Resident 24's room, the curtain, Resident 24's glass with her contaminated gloved hands, walked out of Resident 24's room and in the hallway with the same contaminated gloves on her hands; 3. Resident 34's oxygen tubing was not dated; 4. The filter of Resident 99's oxygen concentrator was dusty; 5. Face mask below the nose for certified nursing assistant A (CNA A); 6. Resident's ADL (active daily living) care supplies for not labeled; 7. No receptacle in room with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control strategy that expands the use of personal protective equipment [PPE, specifically gowns and gloves] for residents with high risk for infection and in high contact). These failures had the potential to spread…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dryer's lint filter was free from lint. This failure had the potential to adversely affect safety of residents, laundry equipment and facility environment. Findings: During a concurrent observation of laundry room and interview with housekeeping/laundry staff E (HLS E) on 4/25/2025 at 8:27 a.m., noted 2 dryers were on drying clothes. Also noted both machines lint (composed of tiny fibers that detach from clothing during drying process) filters covered with thick white layer of lint. HLS E removed lint from both filters. HLS E confirmed both dryer lint filters covered with thick layer of white lint. HLS E stated forgot to check and clean the lint from both dryer's filters since morning. HLS E also stated should have checked and cleaned lint from both lint filters before started the dryers this morning. During an interview with facility's housekeeping/laundry supervisor (HLS) on 4/25/2025 at 8:42 a.m., HLS stated laundry staff should have checked and cleaned lint from lint filters for both dryers before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, resident-centered care plan for two out of eighteen sampled residents, (Residents 27 and 20), when: 1. for Resident 27, there was no care plan for his continuous oxygen inhalation use and 2. for Resident 20, there was no care plan as well for her significant weight loss for six months. These failures had the potential to result in the residents, not receiving the intervention and monitoring necessary to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings: 1. During the observation of Resident 27 on 4/21/25 at 11:05 a.m., Resident 27 was comfortably sleeping in his bed. He was on oxygen (O2, colorless and odorless gas that is essential for life) inhalation at 2 liters (l, a metric unit of volume)/minute via nasal cannula (n/c, device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into the nose). Review of Resident 27's admission record (document created when a resident is admitted to a healthcare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and services for one of six residents (99) when the licensed nurses administered hydrocodone-acetaminophen (used to relieve severe pain) 5-325 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) for Resident 99's moderate pain. This failure had the potential for the residents to experience unnecessary adverse effects from the medication. Findings: Review of Resident 99's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with polyneuropathy (a condition where several nerves in different parts of the body are damaged, and it can impact sensation, movement, or both) diagnosis. Review of Resident 99's physician orders indicated the licensed nurses were to monitor Resident 99's pain level every shift, 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-7 = moderate pain, and 8-10 = severe pain, started on 4/10/25; and hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg every 12 hours as needed for severe pain 8-10, started on 4/14/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician for two of 13 residents (34 and 99). This failure had the potential for the residents to have complications related to improper oxygen treatment. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems) diagnosis. Review of Resident 34' physician order, dated 3/7/25, indicated he had an order for the licensed nurse to place him on oxygen at 2 liters (L, a metric unit of volume) per minute (LPM) every shift related to COPD. During an observation with licensed vocational nurse F (LVN F) on 4/21/25, at 9:44 a.m., Resident 34 was sitting in the lobby and was on 1.5 LPM of oxygen. During a concurrent interview with LVN F, she reviewed Resident 34's physician order and confirmed that Resident 34 should be on 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the effective use of medications for one of 13 residents (28) when Resident 28 received ferrous sulfate (iron, used for prevention/treatment of iron deficiency) and Calcium (a medication used to prevent or treat low blood calcium levels) at the same time. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive the amount of prescribed iron supplements. Findings: Review of Resident 28's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with anemia (a condition that develops when the blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells) diagnosis. Review of Resident 28's clinical record indicated, she had physician orders for ferrous sulfate 325 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) every day for anemia at 9 a.m., started on 8/25/22, and for Calcium 500 mg every day at 9 a.m., started on 7/26/24. Thus, since 7/26/24, ferrous sulfate and Calcium were given at the same time at 9 a.m. every day. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy consultant (PC: a licensed pharmacist provides expert clinical advice and guidance on medication use) identified and reported drug irregularities to the facility during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR: a thorough evaluation of resident's medications) for one of three sampled resident (Resident 31); and facility failed to follow up MRR recommendations for one of thirteen sampled resident (Resident 2). These failures resulted in Resident 31 received more than therapeutic (safety of medication with regard to risk of overdose) dose of medication for over ten months; and Resident 2 received medication for over one month. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 31's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 31 was admitted to facility on 4/19/2024. Review of Resident 31's FS indicated Resident 31's diagnoses including left femur neck fracture (broken left hip upper part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the minds, emotions, and behaviors) for three of four sampled residents (Resident 14, 31, and 249) when: 1. There was no documented evidence of non-pharmacological (treatments and strategies that mange health conditions without using medications) approaches attempted before administered medication quetiapine (used to treat mental health condition) for Resident 14. 2. There was no documented evidence of non-pharmacological approaches attempted before administered medication olanzapine (used to treat mental health conditions) for Resident 31 and 249. This failure had the potential to place sampled residents at risk to receive unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 14's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a glance) indicated Resident 14 was admitted to facility on 2/20/2020. Review of Resident 14's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a serious mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving abuse was reported immediately to administrator or other officials in accordance with State law for one (Resident 1) out of three residents. This failure had the potential to cause further psychosocial and/or physical harm to the residents. Findings: A review of Resident 1's medical records indicated diagnoses including dementia (loss of mental functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning), weakness and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a concurrent record review and interview on 10/14/24 at 10:38 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated that on 10/6/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A reported an alleged abuse on 10/4/24 to Resident 1 from CNA B. DSD also stated that according to CNA A's report, CNA A witnessed CNA B shove graham crackers to Resident 1's mouth and pulled Resident 1's right ear. DSD stated that when CNA A was asked why it was not reported immediately, CNA A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 7. Review of Resident 18's clinical records indicated, Resident 18 was an [AGE] year-old female, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including recurrent (occurring often) enterocolitis (inflammation that occurs throughout the intestines) due to clostridium difficile (a germ that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 18 did not have advance directive and her POLST forms' section D, which indicate if an advance directive is available, dated 8/10/22 and 12/9/23, were left blank. During an interview with the social services director (SSD) on 12/21/23 at 2:57 p.m., SSD verified, Resident 18 did not have advance directive. SSD further verified, Resident 18's POLST forms' section D, which indicate if an advance directive is available, dated 8/10/22 and 12/9/23, were left blank and these sections, should have been filled out. During an interview with medical recorder (MR) on 12/20/23 at 11:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for bed side rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) for six of six sampled residents (Resident 5, 11, 36, 37, 40, and 48). This failure had the potential to place sampled residents at risk for accidents, entrapment, and unsafe environment. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 5's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 5 was admitted to facility on 10/22/2022. Review of Resident 5's physician orders indicated there was no physician order to use side rails for Resident 5's bed. Review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated there were no documentations for physical restraint assessment and informed consent for use of side rails for his bed. Review of Resident 5's care plans indicated there was no care plan for use of bed side rails. During an observation on 12/19/2023 at 12:15 p.m., noted left side bed rail up while Resident 5 was in bed. During an interview with certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. For Residents 23 and 35, the nurse did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes, 2. For Resident 45, the nurse did not perform hand hygiene after medication administration, 3. Staff's face mask below nose 4. Staff did not perform hand hygiene 5. Nursing staff did not use required PPE 6. Urine drain bag on floor for Resident 5 These failures could result in the spread of infection and cross-contamination that could affect the 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 12/19/23 at 11:55 a.m., Registered Nurse B (RN B) did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes after insulin injection to Resident 23. During a medication pass observation on 12/19/23 at 12:08 p.m., RN B did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes after insulin injection to Resident 35. During an interview with RN B on 12/19/23 at 12:10 p.m., RN B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, screening for residents with a mental disorder and residents with intellectual disability) screening document was accurately completed for one out of two residents (Resident 36). This failure had the potential for mentally ill Resident 36 not to receive benefit from specialized mental health care and services. Findings: Review of Resident 36's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Psychosis (a serious mental disorder characterized by a disconnect from reality) and anxiety (a disorder that involves more than temporary worry or fear that can be mild or severe). Review of Resident 36's readmission PASRR level 1 screening for serious mental illness dated 10/14/2022, indicated, he was noted to have no diagnosed mental illness. During a concurrent record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered, care plans for four out of fifteen sampled residents, (Residents 3, 18, 30 and 35), when: 1. for Residents 3, 18 and 30, their activity care plans were not comprehensive and person-centered and 2. for Resident 35, no comprehensive and person-centered care plan for his hearing aids. These failures had the potential to result in the residents, not receiving the interventions necessary to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings: 1. a. Review of Resident 3's clinical records indicated, Resident 3 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral atherosclerosis (degenerative vessel wall disease that results in narrowing of the blood vessels in the brain), chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (comes on slowly with age and occurs if the left ventricle muscle becomes stiff or thickened, hence the heart is not pumping blood, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and services for seven out of nineteen residents investigated, (Residents 18, 30, 41, 23, 35, 39 and 48), when: 1. for Resident 18, the physician was not notified of her weight loss and weight gain of more than 5 pounds (lbs, unit for measuring weight) and there were no alert charting by nurses for 72 hours of her weight loss and weight gain; 2. for Resident 30, there were no alert charting by nurses for 72 hours of her weight loss of more than 5 lbs; 3. for Resident 23, 35 and 39, the nurses used alcohol wipes to wipe the blood after the needle punctures; 4. for Resident 41, the physician orders for blood pressure (BP) medications without holding parameters and 5. for Resident 48, management for his diabetes, not being followed. These failures had the potential to affect the residents' care and could jeopardize their health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 18's face sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) was limited to 14 days of use, for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 101). This failure had the potential to lead to the administration of unnecessary medication to the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 101's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations) and major depressive disorder. Further review of Resident 101's clinical record indicated a physician's order, dated 12/18/23, for Lorazepam 0.5 milligram (mg., a unit of measure) every 8 hours as needed (PRN) without a stop date. During a concurrent interview and record review with Registered Nurse (RN) B on 12/21/23 at 3:54 p.m., RN B reviewed the physician's order and stated there should be a 14-day limit to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 7.41 % when two medication errors occurred out of 27 opportunities during the medication administration for two residents (Residents 45 and 24). The failure resulted in medications not being given according to the manufacturer's specifications and physician's order and had the potential to affect residents' health and well-being in the facility. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 12/20/23 at 8:05 a.m., the Licensed Vocational Nurse E (LVN E) was observed administering the chewable aspirin 81 mg (mg, a unit of measure) to Resident 45. A review of Resident 45's physician's order, dated 11/01/2023, indicated administering enteric coated Aspirin low dose delayed releases oral tablet 81mg by mouth once a day related to cerebral infraction. During an interview with LVN E on 12/20/23 at 2:20 p.m., LVN E confirmed that she administered chewable Aspirin 81 mg to resident 45 instead of enteric-coated. She further stated that she should have followed the physician's order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label the lubricant eye drops bottle for 2 out of 15 sampled residents (Residents 24 and 43). This deficient practice resulted in the nurse administering the wrong eye drops and had the potential to affect residents' health and well-being in the facility. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 12/20/23 at 4:20 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse F (LVN F) administered lubricant eye drops to Resident 24 using a bottle, not labelled with resident identification information. During an inspection of Medication Cart 1 on 12/20/23 at 04:22 p.m., with LVN F, two opened bottle of lubricant eye drops were inside Medication Cart 1 for Residents 24 and 43 without residents' identification information and open date. During an interview with LVN F on 12/20/23 at 4:25 p.m., LVN F confirmed that the eye drops bottle she used with Resident 24 was Resident 43's eye drops bottle. LVN F acknowledged that she should have labeled each bottle with resident identification information to prevent administering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate food preferences for two out of six sample residents (Residents 35 and 40). This failure had the potential for decreased meal intake, negative effect on health and well-being for sample residents. Findings: Review of Resident 40's lunch tray card dated 12/18/2023 indicated, Dislikes: Tomato Products, Spinach. Review of facility's lunch menu dated 12/18/2023 indicated, Fish with Tarragon, Cajun Country Rice, Creamed Spinach, Sweet Corn Salad, Fruit Bavarian Cream. During lunch observation on 12/18/2023 at 12:54 p.m., noted Resident 40's lunch meal tray was served with creamed spinach, and carrots along with other food items from lunch menu. During an interview with certified nursing assistant A (CNA A) on 12/18/2023 at 12:57 p.m., CNA A confirmed Resident 40's lunch tray card dated 12/18/2023 indicated, Resident 40 does not like spinach and tomato products. CNA A also confirmed Resident 40 was served creamed spinach, and carrots during lunch on 12/18/2023. CNA A stated dietary staff should not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food service operations were carried out according to standards of practice when: 1. dented can was found in the dry storage area, 2. the two-compartment sink did not have air gaps (an unobstructed vertical space between the water outlet and the flood level of a fixture) and 3. the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) did not follow safe sanitary practice in the kitchen. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and spread food-borne illness to the forty-three residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen observation on 12/18/23 at 8:57 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), there was one large dented can in the dry storage area. The DS took away the dented can and placed it under the designated area. During an interview with DS on 12/19/23 at 3:30 p.m., DS confirmed the above observations and stated, the dented can should have been placed in the designated area. She stated, We put a sign already for dented cans area. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility's written policy and procedure (P&P) for pneumococcal (PNA- an serious infection of one or both of the lungs caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, or chemical irritant) vaccine (a preparation that is used to stimulate the body's immune response against diseases) for four out of five sampled residents (Resident 5, 11, 26, and 36). This failure had the potential for acquiring PNA and its associated health complications for sampled residents. Findings: 1.Review of Resident 5's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, [AGE] years old Resident 5 admitted to facility on 10/22/2022. Review of Resident 5's immunization record indicated, Resident 5 received PCV 13 (PNA vaccine and a conjugate [conjugate: a type of subunit vaccine which combines a weak antigen with a strong antigen as a carrier so that the immune system has stronger response to the weak antigen] vaccine used to protect against…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure to install and conduct inspections to identify loose fitting bed side rails (SR adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars those attached on both sides of to the bed) for three out of eight sampled residents (Resident 11, 36, and 40)'s beds. These failures had the potential to place sampled residents at risk for accidents and unsafe environment. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 11's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 11 was readmitted to facility on 8/11/2020. Review of Resident 11's physician order dated 3/5/2021 indicated, may have bilateral ½ side rails for bed mobility/positioning. During an observation on 12/18/2023 at 7:55 a.m., observed Resident 11 bed's bilateral 1/2 SR were up while Resident 11 was in bed. Further observation of SR indicated Resident 11's bed right SR was loose fitted and moving side to side loosely. During a concurrent observation and interview for Resident 11's bed SR with facility's maintenance supervisor (MS), and director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for three of 15 sampled residents (Residents 21, 26, and 30) when: 1. Resident 21's anxiety and antipsychotic care plan was incomplete and not person-centered; 2. For Resident 26, there was no care plan developed for the hearing difficulty and the bleeding precautions related to the use of Rivaroxaban (an anticoagulant or blood thinning medication); and, 3. For Resident 30, there was no care plan for use of antipsychotic medication (Haldol). These failures had the potential for inaccurate development and implementation of personalized and resident-centered care plans that would address the residents' identified concerns and needs. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 21's clinical records indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder (mental disorder characterized by periods of elevated mood and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's (CP) medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations were acted upon for three out of 15 sampled residents (Residents 7, 37, and 44). This failure resulted in unnecessary medications due to inadequate monitoring, prolonged medication use, etc. and had the potential for adverse side effects that could negatively impact the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including moderate calorie malnutrition, chronic heart disease, and hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone). A review of Resident 7's medical record indicated the resident was receiving: - Furosemide (Lasix, a diuretic) 40 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement), 1 tablet twice daily from 2/19/21 to 8/25/22; and 40 mg daily for high blood pressure since 8/15/22. - Levothyroxine (a thyroid medication) 88 micrograms (unit of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 10.71% when three medication errors occurred out of 28 opportunities during the medication administration for three residents (Residents 30, 37, and 40). The failure resulted in medications not given according to manufacturer's specifications, and had the potential for residents not receiving the full therapeutic effects of medications. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 8/29/22 at 9:05 AM, the nurse supervisor (NS) was observed preparing 3 medications for Resident 40. The medications included the phenytoin (brand name: Dilantin, a medication for seizures) 125 milligrams (mg) per 5 milliliters (mL) oral liquid. He removed the phenytoin bottle from the medication cart and poured 4 mL into a small medication cup without shaking the bottle first. On 8/29/22 at 9:10 AM, the NS was observed administering the phenytoin liquid, along with the other two medications, via the resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed when 11 of 11 residents on mechanical soft diet (texture modified diet that restricts foods that are difficult to chew or swallow) were to be served roast beef. This failure had the potential to result in residents not meeting the nutritional needs thus further compromising the nutritional status of the residents. Findings: Review of the facility titled Cooks Spreadsheet for week 1 Monday lunch (8/29/22) indicated Swedish meatballs for all types of diet. During a concurrent observation and interview with Kitchen Supervisor (KS) on 8/29/22 at 8:30 a.m. in the kitchen, a tray of roast beef was inside the oven. KS confirmed the observation. During a concurrent interview and spreadsheet review with KS on 8/31/22 at 8:31 a.m. in the kitchen, KS stated the roast beef was not on the Monday (8/29/22) menu list. KS verified meatballs are available to be cooked for the day. During an interview with the dietary cook (DC) on 8/29/22 at 8:32 a.m. in the kitchen, the DC stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under safe and sanitary conditions when: 1. Frozen meatballs were thawed at room temperature. 2. A sanitizing bucket (contains concentration of chemical sanitizer used for cleaning) was placed too near with clean pots. 3. Sanitizing wipes (pre moistened towelettes that contain disinfecting ingredients) were placed next to potholders and liquid seasonings (vinegar, soy sauce). 4. The oven door was broken. 5. The can opener base was not kept in sanitary condition. 6. There were crumbs seen under the microwave oven. 7. Personal items were seen in the food storage and preparation areas. 8. The log sheet for cleaning the ice scooper was recorded incomplete. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination, spread illness to 45 out of 48 residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the kitchen supervisor (KS) on 8/29/22 at 8:28 a.m. in the kitchen, two bags of frozen meatballs on a dry container were being thawed in the sink at room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Resident 4's and Resident 43's oxygen tubing were not changed every week; 2. Certified Nursing Assistant I (CNA I) did not wash or sanitize her hands before feeding Resident 13; 3. Licensed Vocational Nurse D (LVN D) did not wash her hands and change the gloves before cleansing Resident 42's pressure ulcers; 4. CNA L did not perform hand hygiene between residents; 5. The nurse supervisor (NS) did not wipe the medication tray with the disinfectant wipe after use for each resident. These failures could result in the spread of infection and cross-contamination in the facility. Findings: 1.a. Review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including asthma (a chronic disease in which the airways in the lungs become narrowed and swollen, making it difficult to breathe) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician for one of two closed sampled selected resident (Resident 49) upon discharge. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 49 to be discharge home inappropriately. Findings: A review of Resident 49's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and mental functions) and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 49's transfer/discharge report, dated 6/13/22, indicated the resident was discharged home on that day. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 8/31/22 at 10:40 a.m., Medical records (MR) reviewed Resident 49's clinical record and could not provide the physician discharge summary. She further stated there was no physician's order for Resident 49's discharge. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 8/31/22 at 10:44 a.m., the director of nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) in minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 48). When Resident 48 had significant weight loss, had declined in activities of daily living (ADL, daily self-care tasks, e.g., bathing, toileting, and transferring), incontinency and communication. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 48 unable to achieve or maintain optimal status of health, function and quality of life. Findings: 1.Review of Resident 48's face sheet (summary page of a patient's important information) indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, bipolar disorder (mental disorder characterized by periods of elevated mood and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily functioning, often with poor decision-making) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) quarterly assessments was transmitted (sent electronically) to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a government agency) for one of 12 residents (Resident 44). This failure could potentially affect the provision of care or services to the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 44's clinical record indicated he was re- admitted to the facility on [DATE] and MDS quarterly assessments, dated 3/15/22, 6/15/22 and 8/15/22, were completed, but were not submitted to CMS. During an interview on 9/2/22 at 2:09 p.m., with registered nurse K (RN K) she confirmed the above record review and stated that the assessment for Resident 44 should have been transmitted within 14 days after they were complete. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/2/22 at 3:52 p.m., RN K reviewed resident 44's MDS 3.0 final validation report from CMS and confirmed the assessments, dated 3/15/2022,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the skin of one of three residents (Resident 22) when the resident's skin abrasion (surface of the skin has been broken) was not monitored. The failure resulted in progression of skin blisters (skin condition where fluid fills a space between layers of skin) and potential for skin infection. Findings:one resident Review of Resident 22's clinical record indicated he was admitted with multiple diagnosis including peripheral venous insufficiency (a blood circulation disorder that causes the blood vessels outside of the heart and brain to narrow, block, or spasm), muscle weakness. Review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool), dated 7/9/22, indicated his cognition was intact. During an observation on 8/29/22/ at 9:01 a.m. inside Resident 22's room, his lower left leg was noted to be dark in appearance and had abrasions. During a concurrent interview with Resident 22, he stated he had spoken to the staff about his leg and was waiting for treatment. Review of Resident 22's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed treatment for pressure ulcer (an area of the skin that breaks down when something keeps rubbing or pressing against the skin) was followed for two of three residents (Residents 43 and 44). This failure had the potential for decreased healing and further injury to the residents' wounds. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 43's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (a condition caused by brain damage or spinal cord injury that leads to severe or complete loss of strength on one side of the body), pressure ulcer on left buttock, pressure ulcer on right buttock, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident 43's physician order, dated 8/12/22, indicated she had a treatment order for her left and right buttock pressure ulcers to be cleansed with Dakin's solution (used to prevent and treat skin and tissue infections that could result from cuts, scrapes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a fall prevention order for one of four sampled residents (Resident 20) when the pad alarm (device that makes a loud noise to alert caregivers if a resident is getting up from bed) was not placed in bed. This failure had the potential for falls and injury to the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 20's clinical record indicated the resident had a diagnosis including dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning) and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/7/22, indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS score, a test to get a quick snapshot of how well the resident is functioning cognitively at the moment) was seven, which means severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident 20's Fall assessment, dated 7/7/22, indicated 13, high risk. Review of Resident 20's physician order, dated 7/30/21, indicated. Pad alarm while on bed for poor safety awareness every shift. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen (02) according to professional standards of practice for one of one resident (Resident 3). This failure could affect the resident's health and safety. Findings: Review of Resident 3's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on 5/1/ 22 with diagnoses including COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems) and acute respiratory failure. Review of Resident 3's physician order, dated 8/11/21, indicated to administer oxygen at 2 LPM (liters per minute, the flow of oxygen) via nasal cannula (NC, a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen. The device consists of a lightweight tube which on one end splits into two prongs which are placed in the nostrils). During an observation on 8/29/22 at 8:39 a.m., Resident 3 was sleeping in the bed with oxygen at 2.5 LPM via NC. There was an oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 15 sampled residents (Resident 7) was free from unnecessary medications when Resident 7 received long-term diuretic (medication that remove water from the body which can affect the electrolyte levels in the body) without routine electrolyte (such as potassium, calcium, magnesium) monitoring; and levothyroxine (thyroid medication) without periodic lab work for its use. The failure had the potential to result in electrolyte imbalance and inadequate thyroid response, that can cause serious medical conditions such as irregular heartbeats, fatigue, confusion, etc. for the resident. Findings: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including moderate calorie malnutrition, chronic heart disease, and hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone). A review of Resident 7's medical record indicated the resident was receiving: - Furosemide (a diuretic) 40 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement), 1 tablet twice daily from 2/19/21 to 8/25/22; and 40 mg daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 9 residents (36 and 44) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when: 1. Resident 36 received Abilify for schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by abnormal thought processes and an unstable mood), and the electrocardiogram (ECG, a test that measures the electrical activity of the heartbeat) was not done as ordered; and 2. Resident 44 received Latuda for schizoaffective disorder and haloperidol for schizophrenia (a mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), and the liver function tests (LFTs, blood tests used to help diagnose and monitor liver disease or damage) was not done as ordered. These failures resulted in unnecessary medications for the residents, which had the potential for increased risks associated with psychotropic medication use that include, but not limited to, sedation, respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and ensure food were under sanitary conditions for one of three residents (Resident 6) when the resident's food brought from outside was not properly stored, labeled, and dated. This failure had the potential for food borne illness and food contamination. Findings: During an concurrent observation and interview on 8/29/22, at 9:22 a.m., in Resident 6's room, an unlabeled and undated bottle of Nutella was found at his bedside. Resident 6 stated, it was brought outside by my son. During a follow up observation on 8/30/22, at 8:30 a.m., in Resident 6's room, a bottled of unlabeled and undated peanut butter was found at his bedside. During an interview on 9/01/22, at 10: 56 a.m., certified nursing assistant E (CNA E)confirmed the peanut butter was unlabeled and undated at bedside. CNA E stated, CNA should check the food at bedside and informed the nurse. During an interview with Dietary Manager (DM), on 9/1/22 at 10:51 a.m., she stated that every resident is allowed to bring food from outside. Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 21) when Resident 21's bathroom sink was clogged and the toilet bowl had a leak with water spilled on the floor. The facility must provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff. Findings: During an initial tour of the facility on 8/29/2022 at 8:46 a.m., Resident 21's toilet bowl was leaking with water spilled on the floor and a wet white bath towel was observed underneath. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 21 on 8/29/2022 at 8:48 a.m., she stated the toilet bowl had a water leak with water spilled on the floor since she had been admitted on [DATE]. Resident 21 stated the facility staff was aware of leaking toilet bowl and that was why a white bath towel was put underneath to absorb water. During an interview, on 8/30/2022 at 11:50 a.m., with the licensed vocational nurse D (LVN D), she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EVA CARE GROUP — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHEN, JENQIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 04/27/2001
CHEN, TZE-YUNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 08/01/2001
PADAMA, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/02/2017
DIEBOLD, CORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/09/2022
WOODS, NORMANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$475K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 18%Other / private 6%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $475K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$482per resident / day
operating cost
$14,641per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$440per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056026. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next