Gridley Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 165 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 70.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary mental health services for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2) when:1.Resident 1 did not receive consistent counseling and psychiatric services to meet his mental health need.This resulted in Resident 1 reporting being in a constant state of fear and feeling unsafe in the facility, which had the potential to place Resident 1 at increased risk for self harm and social isolation.2.Resident 2 did not receive psychiatric services to meet his mental health need.This resulted in Resident 2 experiencing increased social isolation and expressing thoughts that they would be better off dead, placing Resident 2 at increased risk for self harm.Findings:A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring, revised 2/2025, indicated that behavioral interventions are described as individualized, non-drug approaches to care. These interventions are meant to support both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), was treated in a respectful and dignified manner. Resident 1 reported that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A accused the resident of using the call light too often, crossed their arms, and yelled at the resident to shut up.This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling fearful and worried about possible retaliation from staff.Findings:A review of the facility's policy and procedures titled, Dignity, revised 10/2025, indicated that staff are required to speak respectfully to residents at all times and to treat residents with cognitive impairments with dignity and sensitivity.A review of Resident 1's admission record, indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, depression, and paranoid personality disorder (a mental health condition in which the person has distrust and suspicion of others).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to refer a resident to the appropriate state-designated authority for a level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) when 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR were diagnosed with a new serious mental illness. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, PASRR Completion Policy, revealed, The Center will a make sure that all admissions have the appropriate Patient Assessment and Resident Review (PASRR) completed. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 05/22/2018. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. According to the admission Record, the resident received diagnoses of psychosis, manic episode, and depression on 12/06/2023. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/18/2024, revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, which indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice upon transfer to the hospital for 1 (Resident #47) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns, revised 10/2022, revealed, Residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state (if applicable) bed-hold policies. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. All residents/representative are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these polices at least twice: a. a. notice 1: well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); and b. notice 2: at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). An admission Record indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address a resident's onset of bilateral leg edema for 1 (Resident #15) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for care planning. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 03/2022, specified, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy specified, the comprehensive, person-centered care plan, e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #15 on 05/08/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and essential hypertension. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely initiate antibiotic therapy for 1 (Resident #47) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #47 on 03/16/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/17/2024, revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #47's Progress Note, dated 12/22/2024 at 12:18 PM, revealed the physician gave an order for a urinalysis with a culture and sensitivity. Resident #47's Lab Results Report revealed a urine culture with culture and sensitivity was collected on 12/20/2024 and the results were marked final and reported on 12/22/2024. Resident #47's Progress Note, dated 12/30/2024 at 11:32 AM, revealed the nurse practitioner (NP) started the resident on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment was free from accident hazards, specifically a space heater for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Electrical Safety for Residents, revised 01/2011, revealed, The resident will be protected from injury associated with the use of electrical devices, including electrocution, burns and fire. The policy specified, 3. Portable space heaters are not permitted in the facility. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 06/27/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/03/2025, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. During an observation on 03/24/2025 at 1:01 PM, a free-standing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of laboratory results for 1 (Resident #47) of 2 sampled residents reviewed hospitalization. Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #47 on 03/16/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/17/2024, revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #47's Progress Note, dated 12/22/2024 at 12:18 PM, revealed the physician gave an order for a urinalysis with a culture and sensitivity. Resident #47's Lab Results Report revealed a urine culture with culture and sensitivity was collected on 12/20/2024 and the results were marked final and reported on 12/22/2024. Resident #47's Progress Note, dated 12/30/2024 at 11:32 AM, revealed the nurse practitioner (NP) started the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment, and treatment alternatives in a language she could understand (Spanish) prior to starting a psychotropic (drugs that affect a person's mental state) medication. This failure denied Resident 1's responsible party (RP) her right to participate in Resident 1's treatment decisions and had the potential to affect Resident 1's functional status, rehabilitation and restorative potential, ability to participate in activities, cognitive status, and psychosocial status. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in mental abilities that affect daily life), glaucoma (chronic eye disease that can cause vision loss or blindness), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and type 2 diabetes (body cannot produce enough insulin). Document indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the Medical Director (MD) failed to provide progress notes for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) that reflected a review of total resident care, current condition (including medications and treatments), and MD decisions about the continued appropriateness of a medical regimen. The facility also failed to work with the MD or seek alternate MD participation to ensure Resident 1 received appropriate care and treatment. This failure had the potential to result in miscommunication of medical diagnosis, treatment, unclear and/or missing direct care staff expectations for Resident 1. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in mental abilities that affect daily life), glaucoma (chronic eye disease that can cause vision loss or blindness), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and type 2 diabetes (body cannot produce enough insulin). Document indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WEST HARBOR HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA