Redding Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 207 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 149 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 82.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain food safety requirements regarding a clean and sanitary kitchen environment for food preparation for all residents who consumed food prepared by the kitchen when:1.The perimeter of the kitchen's walls at the height of the counters and below including pipes, drains, electrical coverings, and flooring were spackled with a filth buildup of food particles and adhered grime.2.The paint was chipped, peeling and worn out on walls, sink, and around flooring.3.The exterior of the stove/oven was unclean with cooked on grime.4.Rolling dollies with buckets of kitchen supplies were dirty with black filth.5.The walk-in refrigerator's flooring was found to be buckled and uneven with a vein of rust expanding down the un-joined seam of the flooring, and when cleaned the rust material puddled from under and between the seam spreading on the flooring.These failures had the potential to incite harmful growth of unhealthy microorganisms resulting in food borne illness amongst the residents that consume products produced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for all residents who use the shower room when a spray bottle of bleach cleaner solution was observed in shower rooms one and two on wing three within unlocked cabinets above the toilets amongst toiletry essentials.This failure had the potential to result in physical injury and negatively impact the overall health for residents utilizing the common space.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Homelike Environment, dated February 2021, indicated, Residents are provided with a safe.environment.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, dated Revised July 2017, indicated, Resident safety.and assistance to prevent accidents are facility wide priorities.During an observation on 2/17/26 at 2:00 pm, on wing three, shower rooms one and two were observed to have spray bottles of bleach in unlocked cabinets above the toilet, mirroring one from the other. No lock was visually present or available.During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents sampled (Resident 36), right to a dignified existence was protected when her eyeglasses were not clean.This failure could have resulted in a decrease in Resident 36's vision and emotional well-being.Findings:Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights revised October 2025, indicated, 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. a dignified existence.Review of Resident 36's medical record indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, and difficulty walking.Review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that measures the health status in nursing home residents) section B (part of MDS pertaining to vision) dated 1/8/26 indicated that Resident 36 wore glasses. Review of Resident 36's MDS Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 6) when the care plan did not include the use of TED hose (tight socks that prevent swelling in the legs).This failure had the potential to cause severe leg swelling, delayed healing and an increased risk of blood clots, which could place this resident at risk for negative clinical outcomes.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Goals and Objectives, Care Plans, dated April 2009, indicated, goals and objectives are reviewed and/or revised: when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital or rehabilitation stay.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated March 2022, indicated, the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including which professional services are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of medications for two of five residents sampled (Resident 64 and Resident 85) when:1. Resident 64's medications from home were stored in paper bags in a cabinet in the medication room (a locked room in a healthcare facility used to store, organize, and prepare medications).2. Resident 85's medication was stored loose in a medication cup (a small, disposable cup used for measuring and administering medications) in the medication cart (a wheeled cart used in healthcare to store, medications, and supplies).These failures could have resulted in lost medications or medication errors for Resident 64 and Resident 85.Findings:1.Review of a facility policy titled, Medications Brought to the Facility by the Resident/Family revised April 2007, indicated The facility shall ordinarily not permit residents and families to bring medications into the facility.Review of Resident 64's medical record indicated that she was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up and promptly report the results of an x-ray for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who were sampled due to falls in the facility when Resident 1 fell on her knee and her physician ordered an x-ray and the facility did not recognize they had not received the x-ray results for two days. This resulted in Resident 1 experiencing unnecessary severe left knee pain and a delay in treatment for two days due to a broken bone. This delay in treatment had the potential for Resident 1 to experience ongoing severe pain and negatively impact her physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled,Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated July 2024, indicated 1. The nurse will notify in a reasonable timely manner the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): e. need to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center. Review of admission records for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the rights for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not receive a written notice of a proposed room change. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing distress, frustration and the feeling of not having control over anything in her life. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Room Change/Roommate Assignment revised March 2021, indicated Prior to changing a room or roommate assignment all parties involved in the change/assignment (e.g., [example] residents and their representatives) is given a notice of change prior to the transfer. A review of Resident 1's admission Record (undated), indicated she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included a fracture of the right leg, history of falling, and pain. A review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment) dated 11/13/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment of mental capacity)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 2 (Resident #65 and Resident #72) of 19 sampled residents. Findings included: During an interview on 11/20/2024 at 10:16 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the facility did not have a policy on MDS accuracy. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #72 on 10/12/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. An admission MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/19/2024, revealed Resident #72 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS revealed that the resident was not considered by the state Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. A letter from the California Department of Health Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to initiate a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a resident who received a psychiatric diagnosis, prior to readmission, for 1 (Resident #16) of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, PASRR Completion Policy revealed, The Center will make sure that all admissions have the appropriate Patient Assessment and Resident Review (PASRR) completed. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #16 on 01/10/2024 and re-admitted the resident on 08/01/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance. A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/05/2024, revealed Resident #16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 (Resident #24) of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR. Specifically, Resident #24 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia that was not captured on their Level I PASRR. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, PASRR Completion Policy, indicated, The Center will make sure that all admissions have the appropriate Patient Assessment and Resident Review (PASRR) completed. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #24's on 06/03/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizophrenia with an onset date of 06/03/2024 and major depressive disorder with an onset date of 06/03/2024. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/10/2024, revealed Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Per the MDS,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WEST HARBOR HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA