No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quartz Hill Post Acute

2120 Benton Drive, Redding, CA 96003 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 115 certified beds · (530) 243-6317 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (530) 243-6317 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Feb 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1135 West St · (530) 246-7337 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1775 Eureka Way · (530) 241-3294 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
901 Lake Blvd · (530) 215-1313 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2225 Benton Dr · (530) 225-4095 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.7%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.7%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.3%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.0%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.1%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.632.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.001.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 631 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.57U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 343 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.0%CMS range 63.8–69.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.5–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 5.2–9.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
43.1%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 105.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.74 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-13)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility did not ensure that one of four residents sampled (Resident 1) did not get unnecessary medication when Resident 1 received a nicotine patch (a medicated adhesive patch that sticks to the skin to deliver a steady, controlled dose of nicotine into the bloodstream) when she was not a smoker.This failure caused Resident 1 to have diarrhea, be very unhappy and stressed and had an unwanted adverse effect to her physical and emotional well-being.Findings:Review of a facility policy titled, Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors revised June 2025 indicated 1. Review the resident's medication regimen for efficacy and actual or potential medication-related problems on an ongoing basis. 2. When a resident receives a new medication order, review: b. written diagnosis/indication supporting the use of the medication; g. documentation of the clinical rationale for using the medication.Review of a facility policy titled, Health, Medical Condition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update the responsible party (RP) for one of two sample residents, (Resident 2) when Resident 2 had a fall. This failure violated the rights of Resident 2 and the RP to for all changes to be reported immediately. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy undated, titled, Acute Condition Changes-Clinical Protocol, indicated the nurse and physician will discuss and evaluate the situation. The physician should request information to clarify the situation, for an example vital signs, physical findings, a detailed sequence of events, and descriptions of symptoms. Many acute changes of condition can be managed effectively in nursing facilities with outcomes that are comparable to those of hospitalization. This discussion should consider the patient ' s overall condition, prognosis, and wishes (either direct or as conveyed by a substitute decision-maker/ RP). Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of five percent or less. There were three errors out of 29 opportunities, which yielded a medication error rate of 10.34% for 2 (Resident #77 and Resident #75) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, specified, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame and 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 1. The KwikPen pre-filled insulin pen user manual revised 07/2020, specified, Prime before each injection. Priming your pen means removing the air from the Needle and Cartridge that may collect during normal use and ensure that the Pen is working correctly. If you do not prime before each injection,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was timely reported to the state survey that involved 2 (Resident #12 and Resident #58) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised 04/2021, indicated, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. The policy specified, 1. If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Per the policy, 3. Immediately is defined as: a. within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or b. within 24 hours of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for the use of an as-needed blood pressure medication for 1 (Resident #17) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, specified, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. An admission Record indicated the facility readmitted Resident #17 on 12/11/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/18/2024, revealed Resident #17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #17's care plan included a focus area initiated 06/14/2022 that indicated the resident had altered cardiovascular status related to hypertension. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order for the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilator for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP [continuous positive air pressure/bilevel positive air pressure] Support, revised 03/2015, specified 3. Review the physician's order to determine the oxygen concentration and flow, and the PEEP [positive end-expiratory pressure] pressure for the machine. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 on 10/21/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/28/2025, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #1's care plan included a focus area revised 10/29/2024 that indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and changed their gloves during the provision of incontinence care for 1 (Resident #109) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheter. Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #109 on 01/19/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness) following cerebral infarction. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/26/2025, revealed Resident #109 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and always incontinent of bowel. Resident #109's care plan, included a focus area revised 02/12/2025, that indicated the resident had an alteration in elimination of bowel and bladder. On 02/12/2025 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation requirements were met in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Dietary Manager (DM) was not wearing a hair net in the kitchen. 2. Food was not properly covered, labeled and dated. These failures created a potential risk for exposure to foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable population of 110 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: 1. During review of facility Policy & Procedure (P&P) titled Kitchen Cleaning Policy and Procedures, 4/20/23, the P&P indicated food employees shall wear hair restraints such has hair nets. During concurrent observation and interview with the DM on 1/16/25 at 10:20 AM, the DM was not wearing a hair net in the kitchen. The DM confirmed that she should be wearing a hair net while in the kitchen. 2. During review of facility Policy & Procedure (P&P) titled, Procedure for Refrigerated Storage, no date, the P&P indicated food items will be covered, labeled, and dated. During concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to personal privacy for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when patient care was provided to Resident 1 without privacy being provided. This failure had the potential to cause distress and embarassment for Resident 1 by having other residents watching and knowing her medical problems. Findings: A review of the facility's, policy titled Restorative Nursing Services, dated July 2017 indicated, 5. Restorative goals may include, but are note limited to supporting and assisting the resident in: c. Maintaining his/her dignity . A review of Resident 1's admission Record , indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory and ability to make sound decisions), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in thought organization, attention, memory, problem solving, and safety awareness), and diabetes (high sugar in the blood). During an observation on 1/17/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were adhered to when Licensed Nurse A (LN A) provided patient care in the dining room without following infection control policy and procedures. These failures had the potential to cause the spread of infection and disease to other residents in the dining room. Findings: A review of the facility's, policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program dated August 2016 indicated a. Important facets of infection prevention include: (2) instituting measures to avoid complications or dissemination (spread) and .adhere to proper techniques and procedures. A review of Resident 1's admission Record , indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory and ability to make sound decisions), cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in thought organization, attention, memory, problem solving, and safety awareness), diabetes (high sugar in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to clean the assistive devices used to transfer residents for five out of six mechanical lifts. This failed action had the potential for the spread of infection to clients, staff, and visitors. Findings: A review of the facility's policy revised 7/2017, titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. This policy also indicated to wash and sanitize lift according to manufacturer's instructions, disinfect lift surfaces, wipe with a clean towel until dry. During concurrent observations and interviews on 6/21/24 at 12:09 through 12:24 pm with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, five out of six mechanical lifts were soiled with cumulative dust, sticky yellow and brown colored substances, dried food particles, and grime. LN 1 confirmed these lifts were not clean and could cause the spread of infection to other residents, staff, and visitors and needed to be cleaned as soon as possible. During an interview on 6/21/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents (Resident 2), received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to attain or maintain their independence when routine and scheduled showers and bathing were not completed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 feeling depressed with poor self-esteem, and had the potential to contribute to skin breakdown, infection, and negatively impact their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: A review of the facility's policy revised 2/2018, titled, Bath, Shower/Tub, indicated the purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident, and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. This facility's policy also indicated to Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the shower/tub bath. A review of the facility's policy revised 2/2021, titled, Dignity, indicated, Each resident shall be cared for in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and the facility's policy, the facility failed to complete assessments and add pertinent interventions on the care plan developed for one of three residents, (Resident 2) requiring renal (kidney) dialysis. This failure had the potential for re-hospitalization, and a negative clinical outcome. Findings: A review of the facility's policy revised 9/2010, titled, End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of the Resident with, indicated residents with end-stage renal (ESRD, kidney disease) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. This policy also indicated staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis (removing toxins from the body) care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents. Number five of this policy indicated the resident's comprehensive care plan will reflect the resident's needs related to ESRD/dialysis care. A review of Resident 2's medical record, the admission Record, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0839 — pattern
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed in accordance with California state laws, when registered nurse (RN) 1 was employed from 11/2/23 through 1/4/2024 without a valid registered nursing license issued by the Board of Registered Nursing This failure had the potential to result in substandard quality of care to all the residents in the facility and negatively impact their quality of life and ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of the Employee Information Form, dated 11/2/23, indicated that RN 1 was hired full-time on the day shift with a date of hire of 10/30/23. A review of the facility ' s job description titled RN-Charge Nurse, dated 11/2/23, indicated the position Must possess a current, unencumbered, active license to practice as an RN in this state. The primary purpose of the position was to provide direct nursing care to residents and to supervise day-to-day nursing activities, and to ensure that the highest degree of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the skin assessment care plan and monitor the skin condition for one of 3 sample Residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 did not have skin assessment and wound care treatment until 2 days after his re-admission and had the potential to contribute to wound infection. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain. It is caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), Alcoholic Cirrhosis (Cirrhosis is scarring of the liver caused by long-term liver damage after many years of heavy drinking. The scar tissue prevents the liver working properly) of Liver with ascites (the build-up of fluid in the space between the lining of the abdomen and abdominal organs), diabetes (elevated blood sugar), and difficulty in walking. Resident 1 was transferred to the local hospital on 7/31/2023 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional food safety and sanitation practices were in place when: 1. Inappropriate use of hats and hairnets were observed for three dietary staff members. 2. Four out of four chicken breasts were not stored and handled according to professional standards of practice. 3. Chlorine test strips were not available to all staff, two out of two staff used the wrong test strip, and chlorine test strip results were incorrectly. 4a.The walk-in freezer floor, dry storage rice bin, prep area drawers, stationary and non-stationary fans, reach-in refrigerator, and the ice machine were not clean. b. The stove, oven, tray line, stationary can opener, and sheet pans were non cleanable due to a black residue build up and grime. c. The tray line cutting board was severely scored with non-cleanable blacked surfaces that appeared to be melted. 5. Dietary staff were not cleaning equipment prior to sanitizing. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness for a facility with a census of 89 residents who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident food in safe storage when the facility's walk-in freezer had severe ice buildup and was not maintained in a safe operating condition. This had the potential for equipment failure. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Manager (DM) on 3/7/23 at 9:40 AM, the walk-in freezer was observed to have severe ice buildup on the floor, shelves, walls, ceiling, condenser fans, the piping that hooks up to the condenser fans, and black mat that covered the floor. DM confirmed the severe ice found in all locations of the walk-in freezer and stated the walk-in freezer floor is cleaned weekly or as needed, including the black mat that covered the floor. During an interview on 3/8/23 at 2:54 PM, Maintenance Director (MND) confirmed the freezer had a severe buildup of ice and stated the defrost cycle came on four times a day and caused condensation (water that collects as droplets on a cold surface when humid air comes into contact with it). MND stated the freezer had new parts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individualized needs were met for two of 18 residents when: 1. Resident 70's call light device was not within his reach or his line of sight. This failure had the potential for the resident's needs not being met promptly and an increase in accidents and injury. 2. Resident 85 was not provided a trained and competent language translator for his communication with facility staff. This failure had the potential for the resident's needs not being met and psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 70's record noted that he was admitted on [DATE] withdiagnoses that included stroke, repeated falls, communication problems and muscle weakness. Resident 70 had 8 falls since June of 2022 which made him a high fall risk. Review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment) indicated Resident 70 needed extensive assistance for transfers and walking. A review of policy and procedure titled, Answering the Call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled residents (Resident 50, 7, 25 and 16), and five of six confidential resident interviewed, were not protected from loss when the facility had no system to return lost clothing items to residents. This failure resulted in residents feeling angry and frustrated because they did not have their own clothes to wear. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Property dated March 2021 indicated that Residents are permitted to retain and use personal possessions, including furniture and clothing, as space permits, unless doing so would infringe on the rights or health and safety of others. The policy states further that resident's personal belongings and clothing are inventoried and documented upon admission and updated as necessary, and that the facility promptly investigates any complaints of misappropriation or mistreatment of resident property. 1. In an interview on 3/07/23 at 4:11 PM, FAM A, Resident 50's son, stated that the facility has repeatedly lost his father's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for five of 18 sampled residents (Resident 2, 38, 68, 72, and 73) when: 1. Resident 2 for potential risk of choking hazards during mealtimes (Refer F689); 2. Resident 68 for impaired visual function ; 3. Resident 38 for severe depression; 4. Resident 73 wandering around the facility and; 5. Resident 72 the use of arm brace. These failures had the potential for care plans to inaccurately reflect the care needed, being provided, or resident care needs to go unmet or the conditions to worsen. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Comprehensive Assessments, revised March 2022, indicated comprehensive assessments are conducted to assist in developing person centered care plans. 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, history of falling and dysphagia ( difficulty swallowing). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident 38 medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, heart failure, muscle weakness and bilateral (both sides) groin wounds. During a review of the the facility's policy and procedure titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), revised March 2018, indicated that a resident's ability to perform ADLs will be measured using clinical tools, including the MDS. During record review of Resident 38's MDS dated [DATE], indicated he required staff assistance with all ADLs. During record review of shower/bath schedule dated 2/8/23-3/8/23, Resident 38 was scheduled for baths on Sundays and Wednesdays. He missed 4 out of 10 bed baths scheduled. No record of nail care performed was found. During concurrent interview and record review on 3/10/23 at 8:50 AM with DSD, confirmed that Resident 38 was on the shower schedule for twice weekly bed baths on Sundays and Wednesdays and did not receive 4 of 10 baths scheduled. She confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care to address the safety of two of 18 residents when: 1. Resident 2 did not have assistance during meals. 2. Resident 73 was wandering into other resident rooms frequently without supervision. This resulted a choking hazard and had the potential to put all residents at risk for falls and resident to resident altercations. Findings: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised 7/2017, indicated that the facility strives to make an environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Also, resident supervision is a core component of the systems approach to safety. The type and frequency of resident supervision is determined by the individual resident's assessed needs and identified hazards in the environment. 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had appropriate competencies and skills sets for developing and implementing plan of care for 18 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 2 did not have the direct care staff supervision for safety during meals. 2. Direct care staff did not ensure Resident 68 had eye glasses available for use. 3. Direct care staff did not provide necessary grooming, nail care, and bed bath services for three of seven dependent residents (Residents 8, 38 and 70). 4. Nursing staff did not develop and implement a plan of care for severe depression for Resident 38. 5. Resident 73 had no interventions in place to mitigate his wandering behavior. This had the potential to put all residents at risk for accidents and hazards and decreased quality of care and life. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with CNA C on 3/9/23 at 9 AM, stated that she was assigned to Resident 2 but not too often. CNA C stated that Resident 2 needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage in two out of three medication rooms (a locked room storing the drugs and supplies) and three out of six medication carts (a secure mobile cart storing resident's medications) when: 1. Medication refrigerators (a locked temperature-controlled unit for medication storage) were frosted where vaccines, and insulin (Medicine for blood sugar or diabetic disease) products were stored. 2. Multi dose containers (a bulk container that can be used more than once) of medication and supplies were not dated when first opened and not stored per manufacturer labeling (the drug maker's label on how to store or use the product). 3. Medication refrigerator and emergency kit for narcotic medications (or Ekit contained supply of narcotics or controlled drugs with abuse potential) were not secured with a lock in the medication room. These failures could contribute to unsafe or ineffective medications use in the facility. Findings: 1A. During a concurrent observations and inspection of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the qualifications, competencies, and skill sets of the Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Dietary Manager (DM) were in place and supported to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when: 1. A qualified dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional was not employed at the facility full time. 2a. The RD did not monitor or implement weekly weights for three out of three residents: Resident 4 2b. Resident 59 2c. Resident 85 3. The DM did not meet the minimum qualifications. 4. The DM did not evaluate new staff for competencies. (Refer to F802) These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness, compromise nutritional status, weight loss, ineffective resident care interventions and decreased quality of life impacting 89 residents who lived in the facility. Findings: 1. During an interview on 3/8/23, at 2:10 PM, RD stated hours worked at this facility were approximately 24-25 hours a week and divided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent to perform food safety processes according to professional standards when: 1. Equipment was not cleaned according to professional standards of practice. (Refer to F812) 2. Four out of four chicken breasts were thawing at room temperature. (Refer to F812) 3. Staff used the wrong test strips and documented incorrect results when testing the dishwasher's chlorine level. (Refer to F812) 4. Dietary Manager (DM) did not evaluate new staff for competencies. Failure to ensure staff were competent in food safety processes had the potential to result in foodborne illness for 89 residents consuming food from the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/7/23 at 9:35 AM, in the kitchen's dry storage area, the lid that covered the brown rice was upside down and was covered in gray substance buildup. In the food prep area, two drawers containing food prep items were soiled. The wall mounted fan located in the food prep area pointed towards the tray line had thick…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide two out of two residents (Residents 85 and 4) with plant-based (vegetarian) meals that met the nutritive needs of the residents when: 1. Planned vegetarian menus, prepared in advance, that included a nutrient analysis and alternates (a meal substitute provided when the served menu item was not wanted by the resident) for Resident 85 and Resident 4, were not followed, and were not available for residents or staff. 2. Alternate menu food items did not have a recipe. These failures created the potential for vegetarian residents to receive food that did not meet their nutrient needs and or provide the variety in foods and flavors needed to encourage meal intakes, enhance resident's quality of life, and had the potential to contribute to weight loss. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 85's records indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (memory loss) and unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature when four out of four residents (Resident 4, 19, 38, and 59) stated the food was cold. This failure had the potential for a decrease in meal intake and could contribute to weight loss resulting in compromised nutritional status. Findings: During an interview on 3/8/23 at 1:05 PM, Resident 19 and Resident 59, both stated when meals got delivered to them, their food was cold. During an interview on 3/8/23 at 1:06 PM, Resident 38 stated the eggs served were always cold. During an observation on 3/8/23 at 11:37 AM, the dining cart that contained lunch trays for the residents who ate meals in the assisted dining room (dining area for residents who needed assistance to eat) was placed in the independent dining room (where residents eat meals who do not require assistance). An overhead page on the facility intercom system had been made stating that the dining cart was ready for staff pickup. During an observation on 3/8/23 at 11:43 AM, the Social Services Assistant arrived and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that addressed the full range of services the facility provided when: 1. A qualified Registered Dietician (RD) or other clinically qualified nutritional professional were not employed at the facility full time who was responsible to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service and that their Dietary Manager (DM) did not meet the minimum qualifications. 2. Licensed Nursing staff did not develop and implement a plan of care for five of 18 sampled residents (Resident 2, 38, 68, 72, and 73). 3. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)s had the skills and competencies to assist dependent residents with their Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure had the potential for all residents to be at risk for decreased quality of care and quality of life. Findings: A facility policy and procedured titled, QAPI Program, revised 2/1/20, was reviewed. The policy indicated the facility should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection control practices when: 1. Licensed nurses (LNs) did not sanitize their hands upon entering or exiting five resident's rooms when direct care was provided. 2. Licensed nurse did not sanitize the shared glucometer (a device used to measure blood sugar) in between resident care for Resident 80, Resident 19, and Resident 7. 3. Licensed nurse did not sanitize the shared blood pressure device (or BP device that measured the pressure of blood pushing against the walls of the arteries) in between resident care provided for Resident 80 and Resident 19. These failed practices may result in spread of infection in the facility. Findings: 1A. Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated [DATE], indicated, This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infection, and, .7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol .for the following situations: f.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue complete and timely Beneficiary (a person who received Medicare insurance benefits) Notifications to three of 18 sampled residents (Residents 48, 50, and 77). This failure had the potential to prevent the residents from making informed decisions about their care which could have threatened their health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 48's record showed an original admission date of 8/7/21. Resident 48's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (a stroke), osteomyelitis left femur (infection of the left thigh bone), and chronic pain. Resident 48's representative assisting with healthcare decisions was Family Member (FAM) D. Record review of Resident 48's Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) indicated, The Effective Date Coverage of Your Current MEDICARE A Services Will End: 2/2/23. Record review of Resident 48's CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete assessment for one of five sampled residents (Resident 68) when an assessment dated [DATE] documented that vision was adequate and no activity assessment after admission. These failures had the potential for staff to not be fully informed of his health status, to determine the need for further assessment and interventions that could result in delays in care and decline in resident's condition. Findings: The facility policy and procedure titled, Comprehensive Assessments, revised 3/2022 indicated that comprehensive assessments are conducted to assist in developing person-centered care plans and also in accordance with criteria and timeframes established in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. a. Resident 68 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]/23 with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbances and with repeated falls. Resident 68 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation with specific psychiatric (mental health illness) diagnosis for the use of mind-altering drug called quetiapine (also known as Seroquel, a medication used to treat mental illness) in one out of 18 sampled residents (Resident 40). This failure may pose unsafe medications use in the facility with inconsistent diagnosis. Findings: During a concurrent interview and observation of Resident 40, in her room, at [NAME] station, on 3/9/23, at 10:30 AM, accompanied with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) C, Resident 40 was in bed, eyes closed and then opened her eyes starring randomly with face in distress, she held her hands to the face and kept moving in her bed. CNA C stated Resident 40 needed total assistance for daily care, and she was in bed most of the time. CNA C stated Resident 40's verbal response was mostly Yes or No, Stop that or Don't do that. During an interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) B, who was Resident 40's nurse, at [NAME] station, on 3/9/23, at 11:02 AM, LN B stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a complete Discharge Plan for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 77). This failure had the potential to prevent a smooth and safe transition for Resident 77 from the facility to the community. Findings: A facility policy titled, Discharge Summary and Plan, revised 12/1/16, was reviewed. The policy indicated that when a resident's discharge was anticipated, a post-discharge plan would have been developed to assist the resident to adjust to their new living environment. Every resident would have been evaluated for their discharge needs and would have an individualized post-discharge plan. The post-discharge plan would have been developed by the care planning/interdisciplinary team (IDT-a group of professionals from different disciplines that met to discuss the residents' care) with the assistance of the resident and their family and would have included: where the individual planned to reside; arrangements that had been made for follow-up care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate one out of one resident (Resident 85) with preferred food preferences that met cultural needs when dietary staff did not update Resident 85's medical record with preferences. This failure created the potential for a lack of the variety in foods and flavors needed to encourage meal intakes, enhance resident's quality of life, and had the potential to contribute to weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 85's records indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (memory loss) and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (a lack of proper nutrition or inability to absorb nutrients from food). Resident 85's cognition (ability to reason, think and make decisions) was intact and he was able to make his own decisions. Resident 85 did not speak English, was a vegetarian and required the assistance of one person and supervision during all meals. A review of the record titled, Weight Note,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's document and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (Resident (R) R58) was assisted with her meal in the dining room in a dignified manner. Findings: A review of R58's record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression and dementia (impaired memory loss and judgment). During an observation of the noon meal on 09/02/19 at 12:40 PM, the Activity Director/Certified Nurse Aide (AD/CNA) was seated on a stool assisting R36 with her meal. R58 was seated in a wheelchair at the same table. The AD/CNA then stood up and gave R58 a bite of food. The AD/CNA continued to assist R58 with bites of food as she stood over the resident and then would sit down to assist the other resident throughout the entire meal. During an interview on 09/04/19 at 2:37 PM, the AD/CNA stated that she was a CNA since 2015 and continues her training to keep her can certification. The AD/CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (Resident (R) R64) received oxygen (O2) therapy as prescribed by the physician. Findings: A review of R64's record (EMR) revealed an undated, admission Record with an original admission date of 04/30/14 and a readmission date of 02/20/18. R64 was admitted with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). On 09/03/19 at 9:58 AM, R64 was observed wearing a nasal cannula and the liter flow on the O2 concentrator was set between two and a half and three liter per minute (LPM). The resident was interviewed at this time regarding how much O2 he was to receive. R64 stated, two liters I think. On 09/04/19 at 4:00 PM, R64's O2 flow rate was set between two and a half and three LPM. Review of R64's physician's orders dated 02/03/19 revealed, Oxygen at 2 liter/ min via Nasal Cannula . During an interview on 09/04/19 at 4:15 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) observed R64's oxygen concentrator and stated that it looked like the O2 was set at three LPM. The DON reviewed R64's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WEST HARBOR HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VALLEY CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/27/2017
WEST HARBOR HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST90%since 06/27/2017
GALBASINI, KEVINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL36%since 06/27/2017
GILL, DANIELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL36%since 06/27/2017
ROSENHAN, CAMERONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL18%since 06/27/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.1M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 40%Other / private 7%

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$523per resident / day
operating cost
$15,888per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$569per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555356. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next