Bridgeview Post Acute
521 Lorel Way, Yuba City, CA 95991 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (530) 674-9140 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $68,146 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-09)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.8% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.62 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
68.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 260 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 68.9%CMS range 62.2–74.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 8.1–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 70.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.5%CMS range 6.7–12.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 116.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from neglect when nursing staff failed to recognize and appropriately respond to slurred speech, facial drooping, and right sided arm weakness, which represented of a significant change in condition. The facility failed to ensure timely assessment, provider notification (the physician), and medical intervention.This failure resulted in delayed recognition and treatment of Resident 1's brain bleed, contributing to a permanent and preventable decline in functional abilities, including decreased use and strength of the right arm and loss of independence in performing personal tasks.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated 12/2025, the P&P indicated that when a resident experiences a change in condition, nursing staff are to promptly conduct a comprehensive assessment, document relevant changes in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care for safety and supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4), when Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) H left Resident 4 alone outside on a patio for 30 minutes, where Resident 4 fell and sustained a subdural hematoma (bleeding between the brain and its lining). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 4 experiencing a major head injury, emergency care at hospital, and a significant decline in their quality of life. Resident 4 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] after he fell. Resident 4 returned to the facility on [DATE], with Hospice services (specialized end of life care). Resident 4 passed away at the facility on [DATE], 13 days following the fall.Refer to F609, F679 and F726.FindingsDuring a review of facility policy titled Assessing Falls and their Causes, revised [DATE], indicated falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among the elderly in nursing homes. Falling may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) received respiratory care when a physician ordered Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP-a device that helps breathing) was not implemented for 14 days. This resulted in an emergent transfer to hospital for treatment for severe respiratory failure (not enough oxygen) for five days. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 1:08 pm, indicated she had been hospitalized for 9 days for treatment of acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (respiratory system fails and carbon dioxide [a gas by product that is removed from the body by exhalation] builds up in the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a condition of the respiratory system causing shortness of breath, cough, fatigue and frequent lung infections), toxic metabolic encephalopathy (a condition of acute brain dysfunction resulting in seizures, behavior changes , memory loss, confusion and altered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident 48) who entered the facility without a pressure ulcer (PU), did not develop a pressure sore and that the resident received necessary care and services to promote healing, when Resident 48 was at a risk for PU's upon admit and routine skin assessments did not identify the pressure ulcer at an early stage. Resident 48's PU was identified on 4/7/23 at stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss without muscle, tendon, or bone visible). Resident 48's PU was not evaluated and treated by a wound care physician for 40 days and progressed to a stage 4 PU (a pressure injury that extended through the skin to muscle, tendon, or bone) on 5/18/23. This failure resulted in Resident 48 developing a stage 3 pressure ulcer to her coccyx (a bone at the base of the spine), which was further staged at a stage 4 PU by a wound doctor (WD, a physician that specializes in healing wounds), accompanying a severe weight loss. Refer F692…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document and Policy and Procedure review, the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 48) when: 1. A Change of Condition (COC) assessment was not completed, and the Physician was not notified of Resident 48's severe weight loss of 12.8 pounds (lbs.), 7.7 % between 1/6/23 and 2/5/23, 15 lbs., 9% between 1/6/23 and 2/7/23, and 17.2 lbs., 10.2% between 8/20/22 and 2/7/23, 2. Weekly weights were not completed as ordered on 1/26/23 for Resident 48, and 3. Interventions to mitigate the severe weight loss of 12.8 pound (lbs.), 7.7 % between 1/6/23 and 2/5/23, 15 lbs., 9% between 1/6/23 and 2/7/23, and 17.2 lbs., 10.2% between 8/20/22 and 2/7/23 for Residents 48 were not implemented in a timely manner. As a result of these failures, Resident 48's compromised nutritional status was not monitored and addressed timely which could lead to further medical complications including but not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 experienced a significant change in condition.This failure resulted in delayed timely treatment, during which Resident 1 experienced a preventable decline in functional status, losing strength in the right arm and becoming unable to independently perform personal care tasks.Findings:During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated 12/2025, the P&P indicated that when a resident experiences a change in condition, nursing staff are to promptly conduct a comprehensive assessment, document relevant changes in the resident's medical record, and notify the physician and resident representative. The policy defined a significant change in condition as a major decline that would not normally be resolved without staff intervention or standard disease-related clinical interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-10 · tag F0742 — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the physician's orders for psychiatric evaluation and treatment were implemented and incorporated into the care plan for two of the three residents (Residents 1 and 2). This failure resulted in Resident 1 and 2 not receiving mental health evaluation and had the potential for both residents not to reach their highest practicable level of mental and psychosocial well-being.Findings: A record review of the facilities policy and procedures titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring dated 2/2025, indicated: - Behavioral symptoms are identified using facility approved behavioral screening tools and a comprehensive assessment. - Behavior is the response of an individual to a wide variety of factors. These factors may include medical, physical, functional, psychosocial, emotional, psychiatric, or environmental causes. - Behavior can be a way for an individual in distress to communicate unmet needs, indicate discomfort, or express…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: Several kitchenware stacked wet, and few kitchenware had oily substances and stored in the clean and ready-to-use areasTwo cooking pans were not well maintainedOne kitchen staff verbalized the process of the manual dishwashing with 3-compartment sink incorrectlyThe arrangement of the food stored in the walk-in refrigerator was not in a food safety mannerOne kitchen staff did not have hair restraint to cover the facial hairResidents' food in residents' food refrigerator found did not store and label properly These failures had the potential to cause food contamination which could cause illness to the medically vulnerable residents who consumed food from the kitchen and resident refrigerator in the facility. There were 117 out of 117 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.Findings:1. During an observation and concurrent interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance of quality of life for 9 out of 33 sampled residents (Resident 30, Resident 33, Resident 50, Resident 73, Resident 102, Resident 117, Resident 122, Resident 124, Resident 132) when:Staff spoke a non-English language in resident rooms during resident care when English was the residents' primary language.Resident 73 was not able to use eating utensils to eat his meal and had to use his hands. These practices had the potential for residents to not have their right for dignity, respect, and negatively impact on residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing.Findings: During a review of facility policy titled, English Only Rule (undated) indicated, it was the facility's policy that staff only spoke English . in resident rooms . and in any area of the facility that a resident could hear staff speaking. The English Only Rule, indicated, a violation of this policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate did not exceed 5% for 2 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 66 and Resident 89).1. For Resident 89, a licensed nurse administered canagliflozin (medication used to treat diabetes) not in accordance with Manufacturer's Specifications.2. For Resident 66, a license nurse administered two medications, spironolactone (used to help remove extra body fluid and swelling) and megace (a type of hormonal medication that increases appetite), not in accordance with Physician Orders, resulting in two sperate medication errors. As a result of this failure, 3 errors were identified of 25 opportunities during the observation of medication administration; the facility medication error rate was 12%. Findings: A review of facility policy titled Preparation and General Guidelines: Medication Administration, dated 8/2024, showed that Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices.1. During an observation of medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for the therapeutic diet (a modification of a regular diet, tailored to fit the nutritional needs of a particular person - may be part of a treatment or medical condition and usually prescribed by a physician) during the lunch meals on 1/6/26 and 1/7/26 when:A. During a dining observation on 01/6/26:Resident 35 was on soft and bite size (sb) texture diets (all foods must be soft and able to mash with a fork and chopped into pieces no larger than1.5 centimeters (cm) x 1.5 (cm) designed for residents who experience biting limitations but are able to chew food items for swallowing) received regular green salad instead of hot canned green beansResident 70 was on low fat and low cholesterol (lflc) diet (a diet designed to lower elevated levels of serum cholesterol and other lipids to reduce the risk of heart disease) received a cranberry crunch square instead of fresh fruit for dessertEight residents with sb and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility was failed to ensure the two dietary staff had proper skill to prepare the appropriate texture for Soft and Bite Size (SBS) texture (chopped or cut into pieces size no larger than 1.5 centimeter(cm) by 1.5cm) and Mince and Moist (MM) texture (soft and moist (with all excess fluid drained), size no larger than 4 millimeters (mm) by 15 mm), food items.This deficient practice had the potential to increase risk for the residents with swallowing and/or chewing difficulties to choke and/or aspirate (a condition in which food, liquids, saliva, or vomit is breathed into the airway). There were 31 residents on sb size texture diets and seven residents on mm texture diets, out of the census of 117.Findings:An observation of preparation of food items with SBS texture and MM texture and concurrent interview with [NAME] (CK) M was conducted on 01/7/26 at 10:30 a.m. CK M understood stated she had three food items: carrot, tater tots and crisp fish to make SBS, MM and puree textures. CK M stated she had to prepare 35 servings of SBS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 8) were free of Unnecessary Medication, when Resident 8 had inaccurate diagnoses indications for receiving divalproex sodium, a psychotropic medication. This failure resulted in Resident 8 continuing to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings:A review of facility policy titled Medication Monitoring & Management, dated 8/2014, showed When a resident receives a new medication, the medication order is evaluated for the following . A written diagnosis, an indication, and/or documented objective findings support each medication.A review of Resident 8'S medical records titled admission Summary, indicated that Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), Metabolic Encephalopathy (confusion caused by illness), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a lung disease that causes breathing problems), Chronic Diastolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care related to activities of daily living (ADL) to maintain good personal hygiene when one of three sampled residents (Resident 26) fingernails were long, untrimmed, jagged, and had dirt and food under and on top of the nails. This failure had the potential for self-injury and infection due to unkept nails.Findings: During a review of the facility policy titled Fingernails/Toenails, Care of, dated 2/2018 indicated that nail care includes regular cleaning and trimming, trimmed nails prevent injury, and can aid in the prevention of skin problems. During a review of Resident 26's medical record indicated that Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, infection of the lower leg, and heart failure (the heart can't pump enough blood and oxygen to meet the body's needs). Resident 26's care plan dated 12/17/25 indicated that Resident 26 has an ADL self-care performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its enteral tube (delivers liquid food, medication, and fluids directly into the digestive system (stomach or intestines) when a person can't eat or swallow safely) medication administration policy when staff did not flush enteral feeding tubing with purified or distilled water as required. Instead, staff used tap water to flush the tubing.This deficient practice had the potential to introduce contaminants and place immunocompromised residents at risk for infection.Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Enteral Tube Medication Administration, revised August 2014, it was indicated that warm purified, or sterile water is to be used for dissolving medications and flushing tube. During a review of Resident 2's medical record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including: cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy tube (a tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the risk and benefits of bed rails ( bed canes - safety device placed on the side of the bed used to help people with mobility issues move) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 14), when Resident 10 and 14 were using bed rails and did not have a bed safety assessment completed. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for entrapment, accidents, and injuries.Findings: During a review of the facility policy titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated 8/2022 indicated that bed rails come in different types, shapes and sizes and that the use of bed rails or side rails is prohibited unless the criteria for the use of bed rails has been met. The criteria includes attempts to use alternatives, interdisciplinary evaluation, resident assessment, and informed consent. The resident assessment determines the risk for entrapment, accidents and hazards, mobility restrictions, and psychosocial outcomes. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that their emergency drug kits (E-kit) had accurate or complete record keeping, when 1 of 4 antibiotic tablets was found to be unaccounted for. This failure had the potential for medications to be potentially lost or diverted without documentation. Findings:A review of facility policy titled Medication ordering and receiving from pharmacy: 1C5: Emergency Pharmacy Service and Emergency Kits, dated 8/2014, indicated, The nurse records the medication use from the emergency kit on the medication order/use form and Calls the pharmacy for replacement of the kit/dose and/or flags the kit with a color-coded lock to indicate need for replacement of kit/dose as soon as possible after the medication has been administered.During an inspection of the facility's medication storage room on 1/6/26 at 10:32 am, the emergency supply kit (a locked, specialized container or electronic cabinet that holds a small supply of critical medications, and allows staff to access and give medications without waiting for delivery)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Pharmacy staff were conducting accurate Medication Regimen Reviews for 1 of 34 sampled residents, when Resident 8 was found to have unnecessary medication prescribed for an incorrect diagnosis for 3 months. This failure had the potential to harm residents when medications were not monitored by pharmacy. Findings:A review of facility policy titled, Medication Monitoring & Management, dated 8/2014, indicated, When a resident receives a new medication, the medication order is evaluated for the following . A written diagnosis, an indication, and/or documented objective findings support each medication. This policy also showed The interdisciplinary team reviews the resident's medication regimen for efficacy and actual or potential medication-related problems (on an ongoing basis).A review of Resident 8'S medical records titled admission Summary, indicated that Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored at the correct temperatures. This failure had the potential for medications to not be therapeutically effective. Findings:A review of facility policy titled Medication Storage in the facility, dated 8/2014, showed Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier.During an observation of Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER] on 1/6/26 at 10:32 am, two types of rectal suppository medications were found inside the refrigerator, which had a reading of 34 degrees Fahrenheit. These medications were found to be:1) Acetaminophen (a medication used to treat fevers and mild to moderate pain) Suppository (a dissolving capsule inserted into the rectum, and releases medication), 650 milligrams (MG); packages for two residents found.A review of Manufacturer's Specifications for acetaminophen suppository, indicated Store at 20-25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of seven sampled residents (Resident 13, and Resident 65) medical records contained accurate documentation when their Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) inaccurately indicated that Resident 13 and Resident 65 had advance directives (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated [inability to make decisions]).These failures had the potential to result in delays or inaccuracies in Resident 13, and Resident 65's wishes being carried out if they were incapacitated.Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Advance Directives revised September 2022, indicated that Determining existence of advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to report a major injury for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4), when Restorative Nursing Assistant H (RNA H) left Resident 4 alone outside on a patio for 30 minutes, where Resident 4 fell and sustained a subdural hematoma (bleeding between the brain and its lining) This failure resulted in delaying an investigation into a major injury, and had the potential for other incidents not to be reported. FindingsDuring a review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.19.1, page J-26, dated [DATE]. The CMS document defined Major Injury as Including bone fractures, joint dislocations, closed head injuries with altered consciousness, subdural hematoma. During a review of facility policy titled Assessing Falls and Their Causes, revised [DATE], the policy indicated that the facility should attempt to identify the cause of a fall, and Within 24 hours of a fall,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to honor an activity preference that was developed in the activity care plan for one of three residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential for Resident 1's mental and psychosocial needs not to be met.Findings:A review of a facility policy titled Activity Programs revised June of 2018, indicated activity programs are designed to meet the Interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The Activities Program is provided to support the well-being of residents and to encourage both Independence and community interaction. Activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident. The Activities Program is ongoing and includes facility-organized group activities, independent individual activities and assisted individual activities. Activities are considered any endeavor, other than routine ADLs, in which the resident participates, that is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staff had competencies necessary to care for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 4) when Restorative Nursing Assistant H (RNA H) left Resident 4 alone on a patio for 30 minutes, where Resident 4 fell and sustained a major head injury. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 4 experiencing a major head injury, admission to an acute care hospital, a decline in condition, and eventually death. This failure also had the potential for incompetent staff to care for other residents. FindingsDuring a review of records titled Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) Job Description, indicated that RNA H signed the document on 8/26/25, indicating they understood the duties and responsibilities outlined. The RNA Job Description indicated that RNA H's Duties and Responsibilities included Follow established safety precautions in the performance of all duties.Help residents to perform tasks for him/herself as appropriate as assigned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4 informed staff that they had been slapped in the face by another resident on 6/20/25. This failure had the potential to result in psychosocial and emotional harm for Resident 4 and had the potential to place all the residents at risk for undetected/unreported elder neglect or abuse.Findings:During a review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised 7/2017, indicated that:1. All reports and findings of resident abuse shall be reported to local, state and federal agencies, and thoroughly investigated by facility management.2. All alleged violations involving abuse will be reported by the facility Administrator to the state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility. During a review of Residents 4's admission record, indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were free from accidents and hazards when: a) post fall evaluations did not determine the reason for the falls. b) residents care plan interventions were not reevaluated for effectiveness. c) new interventions were not developed prevent further falls and injuries. d) direct care staff did not know how to identify high risk fall residents and find their fall plan of care. This resulted in multiple repeated resident falls and had the potential for all residents to be at risk for fall/injuries. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy titled Clinical Protocol for Falls, revised March 2018, indicated under: Treatment/Management 2. If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or corrected, staff will try various relevant interventions, based on assessment of the nature or category of falling, until falling reduces or stops or until a reason is identified for its…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to meet this requirement when construction materials were improperly stored in the room of three residents (Residents 2, 3 and 4). This had the potential for accidents and hazards and created an environment that residents did not find home like. Findings: In an interview on 1/13/25 at 9:35 AM, Family Member 1 stated that her mother's room was set up for four residents, but the fourth bed area was taken up by piles of flooring material and adhesive or paint with a privacy curtain pulled around it. She stated that the materials were a tripping and hazard and made it difficult to clean the room thoroughly. In an interview on 1/15/25 at 10:00 AM, Facility Administrator A (FA) A stated that she was familiar with the situation with the storage of materials in room [ROOM NUMBER] of the facility. room [ROOM NUMBER] had been vacant, but then we needed the room and had no place to store the flooring. FA A stated that maintenance stacked the flooring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation requirements were met in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Food was not properly stored, labeled and dated, with expired food items present in kitchen refrigerator/freezers. 2. Kitchen and food service equipment was not in sanitary condition; 3. The kitchen environment was not in sanitary condition; 4. Resident food was not stored or labeled per policy and procedure (P&P) in the resident refrigerator/freezer, and the refrigerator was visibly dirty inside. These failures created the potential risk for exposure to food- and waterborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable population of 105 residents who receive food stored and prepared in the facility. Findings: 1. A review of P&P titled Refrigerators and Freezers, dated 12/2014, indicated the facility will: A. Ensure safe refrigerator/freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation, and will observe food expiration guidelines. B. Supervisors will be responsible for ensuring food items in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights and Dignity revised February 2021, indicated Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 11. Staff promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. A review of Resident 101's admission Record dated 5/28/24, indicated Resident 101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke (blood flow to the brain is blocked and some brain cells die causing disabilities), muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident 101's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 101's BIMS score was 07, indicating Resident 101's cognition was severely impaired. Resident 101's Functional Abilities and Goals assessment indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse for three out of five sampled residents (Residents 22, 35, and 40) were investigated and residents were protected during this process when: 1. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) M did not report suspicions of abuse when CNA M noticed Resident 22 showed fear during care. 2. CNA J did not report an allegation made by Resident 40 that the Housekeeper (HSK) A instructed Resident 40 to clean her own toilet. 3. When facility staff did not report an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse, when CNA E held down Resident 35. This placed all residents at risk for staff to resident abuse and had the potential for physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Prevention Program, indicated, suspicion and allegations of abuse would be investigated, and residents would be protected from further abuse during the investigation. A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to provide medically related Social Services, that met the needs of the residents, for four out of 22 sampled residents (Residents 35, 87, 90, and 98) when: 1. Social Service care plans (a document that described resident goals and the interventions [instruction, actions, education, and care required] that facility staff would utilize to assist in residents reaching their goals) were not updated quarterly (every 3 months) or as needed for Residents 87 and 90. 2. Care conference meeting (meeting held quarterly to discuss care, needs, and goals, that included the resident, social services, nursing, activities director and the dietary department) notes did not reflect a discharge plan or discharge planning needs for Resident 90. 3. Social Services did not assist Resident 90 with financial documents when requested. 4. Outside services and referrals were not made in a timely manner for Resident 98. 5. Dental services were not provided in a timely manner for Resident 35. These failures had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and medication supplies were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when: 1. Two loose pills were found in the drawer of medication cart 2. 2. Six medications that were being dispensed were opened and not dated. 3. Four Foley drainage bags (A bag that collects urine which comes from the bladder through a catheter tube) in a storage room ready for use were expired. 4. Pro-Stat concentrated liquid protein medical food was being dispensed but had expired. These failures had the potential for medication misuse, medication ineffectiveness, and potential exposure to harmful pathogens (bacteria, viruses, fungi) from expired supplies for residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 10/2/24 at 10:12 am, an inspection of medication cart 2 was performed. Two loose pills were observed in the middle drawer the medication cart. The ADON confirmed that there should not be loose pills in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food that maintained an appetizing flavor, texture, appearance, and at a palatable (pleasant taste) temperature when 5 of 22 sampled residents (Residents 11, 35, 77, 84, 215) when: 1.Resident 77 stated the food was overcooked and could not even cut it. 2. Resident 84 stated the pork was undercooked, and he had to throw it away. 3. Resident 11's ice cream was served melted. 4. Resident 35's food was served cold, ice cream was served melted, and biscuits were served burnt. 5. Resident 215's pizza was served burnt. These failures resulted in meals to be served overcooked, undercooked, cold, unpleasant, and not meet the resident food preference, which had the potential for residents to decrease meal intakes and have weight loss issues. Findings 1. During a review of Resident 84's clinical record, indicated that Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke, diabetes (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 22 (Resident 35 and 40) residents were free from abuse and the potential for ongoing abuse when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E grabbed and held Resident 35's arm when attempting to do personal cares and CNA E continued to be assigned to Resident 35's room after the incident. 2. Housekeeper (HSK) A made Resident 40 clean her own toilet that had feces on it. HSK A continued to be assigned to clean Resident 40's room. This failure caused emotional distress and mental anguish for Resident 35 and Resident 40. Findings: A review of the State Operations Manual (SOM) revised 2/3/23, indicated abuse is defined as the willful (to act deliberately) infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights Revised December 2021, indicated Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report suspicions and allegations of abuse for three out of five sampled residents (Residents 22, 35, and 40) when: 1. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) M did not report suspicions of abuse when CNA M noticed Resident 22 showed fear during care. 2. CNA J did not report an allegation made by Resident 40 that the Housekeeper (HSK) A instructed Resident 40 to clean her own toilet. 3. Facility staff did not report an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse, when CNA E held down Resident 35. The failure to report abuse suspicions and allegations had the potential for residents' to be at risk for staff to resident abuse and had the potential to cause psychosocial harm and negatively impact the resident's overall wellbeing. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Abuse Prevention Program, revised 12/1/16, indicated, the facility would .report any allegations of abuse within timeframes as required by federal requirements. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation for one of three closed records reviewed when Resident 112 was transferred to an acute care hospital and the facility did not document the date and time of their transfer, where they transferred to, how they were transported, or the disposition of their personal effects and medications. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 112's continuity of care and had the potential risk of them receiving inadequate care or services. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy, titled, Transfer or Discharge Documentation, no revised date provided, indicated: - When a resident is transferred or discharged , details of the transfer or discharge will be documented in the medical record and appropriate information will be communicated to the receiving health care facility or provider. - When a resident is transferred or discharged from the facility, the following information will be documented in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 23 (Resident 101) residents had non-skid footwear on to prevent falls as per his care plan. The facility's lack of safety intervention for Resident 101 had the potential for injury related to unwitnessed falls. Findings: A review of Resident 101's admission Record dated 5/28/24, indicated Resident 101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke (blood flow to the brain is blocked and some brain cells die causing disabilities), muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident 101's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) dated 9/4/24, indicated Resident 101's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, evaluates a person's cognition, [ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions] with scores from 00 to15) score was 07, indicating Resident 101's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care for two out of three sampled residents (Residents 87 and 214) with a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) when: 1. Licensed Nurses (LN) did not follow Resident 87's Physician orders regarding g-tube feeding (Physician prescribed liquid nutrition [formula/feedings] amounts, hydration (free water provided for hydration), water flushes (water flushes aide in keeping the g-tube unclogged and maintained), and inaccurately documented intake amounts. 2. For Resident 87, LNs provided g-tube care without a Physician's order and did not document the care that was provided. 3. Resident 214 received an excessive amount of fluids. These failures placed g-tube residents at risk for fluid overload (too much fluid that placed residents at risk for choking), g-tube malfunction, and had the potential for a decline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician progress notes (doctor's note about resident progress, care, and medical issues) were complete, signed and dated at each visit for for two of four sampled residents (Resident 34, and 98). This failure had the potential to negatively affect communication between disciplines and to result in inappropriate care and service for the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's job description, titled, Medical Director (MD), revised 10/20, indicated that the MD's duties and responsibilities which included: - Interview residents to obtain history, perform physical examination, order labs, and other tests, prescribe medications and treatments as part of the plan of care. - Provide routine medical care for residents as necessary. - Ensure residents attain or maintain their highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. During a review of Resident 34's clinical record, indicated that Resident 34 was initially admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated appropriate skill sets that were required to care for * out of 22 sampled residents when: 1. Licensed Nurses (LN) did not reassess, notify the Physician, or follow up on Resident 98's potentially infected right eye. 2. LNs and Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) did not report suspicions or allegations of abuse for Residents 22, 35, and 40. (Refer to F609) 3. LN did not adequately monitor gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) feedings (liquid hydrations provided through the g-tube) and provided care without a Physician's order. (Refer to F693) 4. LNs did not thoroughly check meal trays to ensure residents received the appropriate food. (Refer to F800) These failures had the potential for hospitalization, and could negatively impact resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 61) failed to be free of unnecessary psychotropic medications when Resident 61 had a routine Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) order of 0.5 milligrams (mg - a unit of measure) and a pro re nata (PRN - as needed) order for Ativan 0.5 mg. The PRN Ativan order was available for five months without an order end date despite Consulting Pharmacist (CPH) recommendations to discontinue the PRN order or limit the order to 14 days per Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS - a federal entity that works to improve the quality of healthcare) regulations. Psychotropic medications affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors and include anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety and hypnotic (sedating) medications. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 61 to experience adverse (negative, potentially harmful) side effects from excessive or unnecessary psychotropic medications including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) on dental services was followed for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 35). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's weight loss due to difficulty eating. Findings: A review of the facility policy titled Dental Examination/Assessment revised December 2013, indicated Upon conducting a dental examination, a resident needing dental services will be promptly referred to a dentist. A review of Resident 35's admission Record dated 8/27/24, indicated he was re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included lung disease, depression, left sided paralysis (unable to move his left arm and leg), adult failure to thrive (the feeling of wanting to give up on life), colostomy (a surgical procedure that redirects the colon to an opening in the abdominal wall in which the bowel will exit into a bag), and an indwelling urethral catheter (a tube that goes into the bladder and drains the urine into a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor food preferences for five out of 22 sampled residents (Residents 46, 90, 100, 104, and 106) when: 1. Resident 46 received eggs for breakfast. 2. Resident 90 received rice with meals. 3. Resident 100 received tomatoes with a salad. 4. Resident 106 received eggs for breakfast and a tuna fish sandwich for lunch. 5. Resident 104 received carrots, peas, and corn with meals. This failure had the potential to negatively impact psychosocial health and cause weight loss. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Dining and Food Preferences, revised 9/1/17, indicated, resident food preferences would be reviewed, documented, and an alternate meal substitution would be provided. A review of the Resident Council meeting notes, dated 7/23/24, indicated, food complaints from the previous meeting held in June, had not been resolved. The meeting notes did not indicate, what the food complaints were. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure enough nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills to implement a respiratory plan of care for one of four sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a decline in Resident 1 ' s respiratory and metabolic status (a condition where the decline of the lung function negatively affects the functioning of the rest of the body) resulting in emergent transfer to a hospital for treatment. Refer to F695. Findings: A review of facility policy titled CPAP/BiPAP Support and Cleaning dated March 2015, indicated only a qualified and properly trained nurse or respiratory therapist should administer oxygen through a CPAP/BiPAP mask. A resident ' s medical record should be reviewed to determine his/her baseline oxygen saturation, respiratory, circulatory status. The physician ' s order should be reviewed to determine the oxygen concentration and flow and pressure settings for the machine. A review of Resident 1 ' s hospital Discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of four residents (Resident 1) was educated, informed and allowed to make her own medical decisions before administering a psychotropic (alters mood and behavior). This failure resulted in Resident 1 to receive an unnecessary medication and had the potential for adverse effects such as sedation, dry mouth, weakness, headaches, dizziness, nausea and being unable to sleep. Refer to F758. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Informed Consent Policy, undated, under documentation form, indicated This verification that informed consent was given shall be made available to the facility from either the person who obtained the consent (physician or nurse practitioner - only if they were the one who prescribed the medication) or who gave the consent (patient/resident, or responsible party, if patient/resident is not capable) in either verbal, FAX, e-mail, or document (copy or original). The facility staff who are authorized to take such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to create an accurate comprehensive admission assessment for one four sampled residents (Resident 1) when a physician ordered treatment for a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP-a device to help breathing) was not identified. This resulted in a decline in Resident 1 ' s respiratory and metabolic status (a condition where the decline of the lung function negatively affects the functioning of the rest of the body) requiring a transfer to a hospital for emergent treatment. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Resident Assessments F636; F637; F638 undated, indicated a comprehensive assessment of each resident is completed at intervals. Comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment) include Care Area Assessment (CAA) process for resident care planning. Information for the MDS assessments will consistently reflect information in the progress notes, plans of care, and resident observations/interviews. A review of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to create a baseline care plan that included a respiratory treatment for one four sampled residents (Resident 1) when she did not receive her physician ordered Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP-a device that helps breathing). This resulted in a decline in Resident 1 ' s respiratory and metabolic status (a condition where the decline of the lung function negatively affects the functioning of the rest of the body) requiring a transfer to a hospital for emergent treatment. Findings: A review of a policy and procedure titled Care Plans - Baseline - F655, revised March 2022, indicated that the baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident .must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including .physician orders. The baseline care plan is used until the staff can conduct the comprehensive assessment and develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of four residents (Resident 1) was free of an unnecessary psychotropic medication (drug prescribed to affect the mind, emotions, or behavior) when she was prescribed Lexapro (medication used to treat depression and anxiety) was administered without clinical indication. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to receive an unnecessary medication and put her at risk for adverse side effects such as sedation, dry mouth, weakness, headaches, dizziness, nausea and being unable to sleep. Refer to F552. Findings: A review of facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022, indicated the use of any psychotropic medication is based on comprehensive review of the resident. Residents who have not used psychotropic medications are not prescribed or given these medications unless the medication is determined to be necessary to treat a specific condition that is diagnosed and documented in the medical record. A review of facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0841 — isolatedDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) supervised the development and implementation of a plan of care for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Upon admission orders for BiPAP (device to help breathing) were not implemented. Refer to F 695 2.a. Informed consent was not obtained before administering a psychotropic (alters mood behavior) medication. Refer to F 552 b. An unnecessary psychotropic was prescribed without clinical justification. Refer to F 758 This failure resulted in respiratory failure that required emergent hospitalization and an unnecessary psychotropic medication to be administered without clinical justification. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Medical Director revised July 2016, indicated physician services are under the general supervision of the Medical Director (MD). The MD was responsible for ensuring adequate and appropriate physician services. MD was to oversee and help develop and implement care related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: 1. The ice machine was not in sanitary condition, 2. Time Temperature Control for Safety Foods (TCS) (food that requires time and temperature to limit the growth of illness causing bacteria) were not handled safely, 3. Food was not stored safely, 4. Food preparation equipment was not cleaned or air dried, 5. Nonfood contact surfaces were not clean, and 6. One food preparation sink and one steamer did not have an air gap. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illnesses in a medically vulnerable population of 99 who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022 Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils, (A) Equipment, food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Ice, dated 9/2017, indicated, ice will be prepared and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-28 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assessment and performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was in place for identifying and responding to resident care concerns with a good faith effort, by implementing, monitoring, and evaluating action plans for weight loss, pressure ulcers, staffing and competency, and abuse. This failure had the potential to affect how the facility ensures care and services are delivered meet accepted standards of quality, identify problems and opportunities for improvement, and ensure progress toward correction or improvement was achieved and sustained. Findings: A review of a policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program - Governance and Leadership, with a revised date of March 2020, indicated, The administrator . is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program, and for interpreting its results and findings to the governing body. The document indicated that the responsibilities of the QAPI committee included: identify, evaluate, monitor, and improve facility systems and processes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-28 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of six sampled residents, (Resident 303) received communication in a language that she could understand and verbalize needs in order to make informed care choices and decisions, when the resident only spoke Spanish and no interpreter services were used in the facility. This failure had the potential for the resident's needs and preferences not being met and the potential for complications of health status related to recent heart valve replacement and diabetes. Findings: During a review of a policy not dated, titled Translation and/or Interpretation of Facility Services, indicated the facility's language access program will ensure residents with limited English proficiency (LEP) shall have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility. Competent oral translation of vital information that is not available in written translation shall be provided in a timely manner at no cost to the resident through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident complaints were acted upon timely and implement plans of action to correct the identified issues. This failure resulted in ongoing unresolved complaints. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Resident Council revised February 2021, indicated the purpose of the resident council was to provide a forum for residents/families to have input in the operation of the facility. They can discuss their concerns and suggestions for improvement. A resident council response form will be used to track their resolution. The facility department will be responsible for addressing the item of concern. The quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) will review information and feedback from the council and may be referred to the committee when there was a pattern in the issue the council identified. A review of the resident council meetings minutes indicated: On 10/27/22, dietary services spoke to the resident about consistency on time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the right to personal privacy for all residents who showered when there was no system for communicating when a shower was or was not in use without opening the door. This failure had the potential to cause distress for the residents and threaten their health and well-being. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/20/23, at 9:50 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) M opened the door to the shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA M used the keypad combination lock. An unknown resident was in a shower chair, bathing in the shower stall. When asked if there was any way to know if the shower was in use before opening the door, besides listening for the sound of running water, CNA M said no. There was no sign outside the door to indicate a resident was bathing. Soon a second staff member attempted to open the shower room door using the keypad before being told someone was already in the shower. During an interview, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike environment for ten of ten sampled residents (Residents 10, 17, 21, 24, 29, 33, 51, 58, 300, and 302) when: 1. The walls were in disrepair in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. A screen was protruding from the window in room six. 3. Vertical blinds were broken in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 4. Screens were in disrepair with holes in rooms 24, 30, 32, 34, and 35. 5. A picture was not hung on the wall and a piece of furniture not assembled for Resident 24. This failure had the potential to allow pests to enter through the open windows and to create a visually unpleasant environment, both of which could have negatively impacted the residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 51's clinical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 51's diagnoses included psychosis (a loss of touch with reality), anxiety, and depression. During an observation, on 6/20/23, at 2:39 PM, Resident 51…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure direct care and administrative staff reported allegations of staff to resident abuse to the mandated agencies for three of three sampled residents (Resident 63, 74 and 86). This had the potential to put all residents at risk for abuse from staff at the facility. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program revised December 2016, indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse. Identify and assess incidents of abuse. Investigate and report any allegations for abuse within the timeframes as required by federal requirements. Protect residents during the abuse investigations. A review of the resident concern and grievance log, indicated from 2/2-6/10/23, seven out of 11 resident complaints listed the concern was related to nursing and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) care. A review of the resident grievance/complaint form dated 2/2/23, the Social Service Director (SSD) documented Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of staff to resident abuse were investigated and residents were protected during this process for three of three residents (Residents 63, 74 and 86). This put all residents at risk for staff to resident abuse. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program revised December 2016, indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse. Protect residents during the allegation of abuse investigations. A review of the resident grievance/complaint form dated 2/2/23, the Social Service Director (SSD) documented Resident 63's complaint that CNA E (agency registry staff) took his call light device and television (TV) remote away from him, so he could not use it. Resident 63 explained at 2 AM on 2/1/23, he yelled and hollered for help so he could use the restroom, CNA E told him to go (urinate) in his continence briefs. Resident 63 further explained at some point he got the TV remote back and not the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that six of six sampled residents (Residents 23, 29, 32, 33, 64, and 302), received assistance with activities of daily living to attain or maintain their independence when: 1. Routine grooming activities were not completed for Resident 32 and Resident 64. 2. Routine and scheduled showers were not completed for Residents 23, 29, 33 and 302. These failures had the potential to result in the residents feeling depressed with poor self-esteem, and had the potential to contribute to skin breakdown, infection, and negatively impact their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: 1. A facility policy, titled, Fingernails/Toenails, Care Of, revised 2/1/18, was reviewed. It's stated purpose was to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. Nail care included daily cleaning and regular trimming. Documentation was to have included date, time, name and title of individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the individual care needs for 14 out of 20 sampled residents (Residents 63, 26, 10, 15, 250, 33, 29, 23, 302, 32, 64, 68, 57 and room [ROOM NUMBER]) when: 1. Insufficient nursing staff to answer call lights to provide care to dependent residents. This resulted in residents to feel angry and neglected. 2. Showers and nail care were not provided. This had the potential for changes in resident skin conditions not to be identified and to feel undignified. 3. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) performing Activities of Daily Living (ADL,resident care) during meal tray delivery. This resulted in residents to feel frustrated, hungry and food was cold. Findings: 1. A review of the Daily Staffing Sheets for the night shift (NOC, 10:30 PM to 7 AM) indicated: On 2/1/23, three out of five scheduled CNAs signed the sheet. On 2/2/23, three out of four scheduled CNAs signed the sheet. On an undated sheet, three CNAs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) are able to demonstrate competency in skills to follow the residents plan of care to meet their needs. This failure resulted in dependent residents not to receive nursing interventions to ensure their plan of care was implemented. Findings: A review of a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) job description undated, indicated they provide routine daily nursing care and services in accordance with the plan of care of each resident based on established nursing care procedures and the direction of a supervisor. Ensures residents needs are maintained with the highest degree of dignity. Promptly answers resident call lights and provides appropriate responses and requests. Performs comprehensive resident care duties including but not limited to bathing, vital signs, changing linens, properly positioning residents and giving AM and PM care. Reports the following in accordance with established facility procedures and regulatory standards resident grievances, complaints and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-28 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure performance reviews for four out of six Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA A, B ,C and D) were completed every 12 months. This had the potential for direct care staff not to provide quality of care and meet the needs of the residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and employee file review on 6/23/23 11 AM, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) confirmed there were no annuals performance reviews completed for: 1. CNA A, Date Of Hire (DOH) 3/18/22. 2. CNA B, DOH 12/1/21. 3. CNA C, DOH 9/29/2009. 4. CNA D, DOH 7/5/17, the last completed annual evaluation was on 7/12/2020. During an interview on 6/22/23 2:45 PM, the Administrator (ADMIN) confirmed no annual reviews had been done for CNAs for some time. ADMIN confirmed they currently do not have a policy but verified with management that the expectation was to complete them annually.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed when: 1. The procedure to puree foods was not followed for eight of eight residents, 2. Correct portion sizes were not followed and 3. Gravy was not added per the menu. This failure had the potential to not meet the resident's nutritional needs. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's record, Corporate recipe-number 7277; Entrée-Beef, undated, indicated for pureed beef measure the desired number of servings into the food processor. Blend until smooth. Add liquid if product needs thinning. Add commercial thickener (powder substance that thickens the pureed food) if product needs thickening. Liquid and thickener measurements are approximate and slightly more or less may be required to achieve desired pureed consistency. During an observation and interview on 6/21/2023 at 11:12 AM, in the kitchen, with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 stated he was preparing pureed meatloaf for eight residents. [NAME] 1 cut the meatloaf into portions and weighed out eight 4-ounce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 of 6 Residents (Resident 150) the right to be treated with dignity and respect when his clothes were visibly soiled. This failure led to the lack of self-esteem, frustration, and loss of dignity for Resident 150. Findings: During an observation and interview on 6/20/23 at 11:29 AM, Resident 150 was visibly agitated and expressing vocalizations of frustration, indicating it was due to a lack of clean clothing. Resident wearing visibly soiled white shirt, visibly soiled black sweatpants, and socks with shoes on. Resident able to verbalize he was waiting a long time for staff to help him, and then continued to vocalize agitation. During an observation and interview on 6/21/23 8:47 at AM, Resident 150 did state he wanted to buy more clothes to wear. Gestured to visibly soiled black shirt and visibly soiled black sweatpants and said yeah when asked if he wanted clean clothes to wear. Resident 150 stated he would go to Walmart to buy more clothes for himself, but the facility can't take him. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was informed of a change of condition for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 48). This failure had the potential for Resident 48 to have a delay in care and treatment. Findings: A review of the facility P&P titled Acute Condition Changes - Clinical Protocol revised 3/2018 showed in part, 1. The physician will help identify individuals with a significant risk for having acute changes of condition during their stay .2. In addition, the nurse shall assess and document/report the following baseline information: a. Vital signs; .7. Before contacting a physician about someone with an acute change of condition, the nursing staff will collect pertinent details to report to the physician . Review of the facility document titled Weights and Vitals Summary from 1/6/23 to 2/7/23 showed the following weights and comparison for Resident 48: *On 1/6/23 = 166 lbs., *On 2/5/23 = 153.2 lbs., -12.8 lbs., a 7.7% severe weight loss in one month [comparison weight on 1/6/23, 166 lbs.]; -15.6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and person-centered Care Plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 8) when there was nothing included for depression. This failure had the potential for Resident 8's needs to go unmet which could have negatively impacted their health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 8's clinical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease of the central nervous system that caused muscle weakness), anxiety (nervousness), psychosis (loss of touch with reality), and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (a mental health disorder that was marked by a combination of hallucinations or false beliefs and extreme highs and lows of mood). Medications ordered for Resident 8 included olanzapine for psychosis as evidenced by yelling that interfered with care, and clonazepam for anxiety as evidenced by verbalization of worries over health concerns. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services and devices to maintain or improve hearing difficulty, for one of one resident reviewed for communication-sensory (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to not effectively communicate and express her needs, which potentially negatively affected her well-being and quality of life. Findings: A review of a policy titled, Hearing Impaired Resident, Care of, with a revised date of February 2018, indicated, Staff will assist hearing impaired residents to maintain effective communication with clinicians, caregivers, other residents and visitors. A review of the facility's records indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospital stay, with an initial admission date of 11/26/2019. Resident 3 had diagnoses that included: generalized muscle weakness, vascular dementia, cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two residents out of six sampled residents (Resident 302 and 303) were treated for pain in a timely manner by not identifying and reporting a new onset of pain. This failure resulted in altered mood, and the potential to cause a decline in health status and overall quality of life. Findings: 1- A review of a policy revised March 2018, titled Pain-Clinical Protocol, indicated the nursing staff will assess each individual for pain upon admission to the facility and when there is onset of new pain. The nursing staff will identify any situations or interventions where an increase in the resident's pain may be anticipated. The staff and physician will evaluate how pain is affecting mood, activities of daily living, sleep, quality of life, as well as how pain can be contributing to complications such as gait disturbances, social isolation, and falls. During a record review, Resident 302 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate seven out of out of 20 residents (Residents 10, 20, 24, 35, 36, 64, and 82) with preferred food preferences when dietary staff did not update or serve the dietary preferences the residents requested or tried to obtain an alternate. This failure created the potential for a lack of the variety in foods and flavors needed to encourage meal intakes, enhance resident's quality of life, and had the potential to contribute to weight loss. Findings: During a review of a policy revised October 2017, titled Food and Nutrition Services, indicated each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking in consideration the preferences of each resident. Food and Nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and is served at a safe and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the policy titled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors' dated 3/2022, was implemented. These failures posed the risk of resident food brought to the facility from the outside not being handled in a safe manner which posed the risk of food borne illnesses. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors' dated 3/2022, indicated in part .: 3. Family/visitors are asked to prepare and transport food using safe food handling practices including: a. Safe cooling and reheating processes beholding temperature apprehending cross contamination with raw or undercooked foods d. Hand hygiene 4. Safe food handling practices are explained to family/visitors in a language and format they understand. 5. Food brought by family/visitors that is left with the resident to consume later is labeled and stored in a manner that is clearly distinguishable from facility-prepared food. a. Nonperishable foods are stored in re-sealable containers with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three trash bin lids were tight fitting when one of three lids had a hole. This had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022 Section 5-501. 113 Covering Receptacles, Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and return tables shall be kept covered: (B) with tight fitting lids or door if kept outside the food establishment. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Dispose of Garbage and Refuse, dated 8/2017, indicated, all garbage and refuse will be collected and disposed of in a safe manner. Appropriate lids are provided for all containers. On 6/20/2023 at 3:05 PM an observation of the trash bins located in the rear parking lot and concurrent interview was conducted with the Director of Maintenance (DM). The lid on the recycle bin used for cardboard boxes had an open area on one of the two lids. DM confirmed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$68,146 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $16,350 — penalty dated 2026-06-09
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-08-27
- $41,438 — penalty dated 2024-03-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WEST HARBOR HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VALLEY CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 11/01/2018 |
| WEST HARBOR HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 90% | since 11/01/2018 |
| GALBASINI, KEVIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 36% | since 11/01/2018 |
| GILL, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 36% | since 11/01/2018 |
| ROSENHAN, CAMERON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 18% | since 11/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056346. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.