Pacific Palms Healthcare
1020 Termino Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90804 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 133 certified beds · (562) 433-6791 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Nov 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $19,475 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-06)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 28.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.8%CMS range 37.1–66.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.0–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 28.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 5.1–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 116.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.551 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, the resident, who was assessed as being a moderate risk for falls, did not fall for one of one sampled resident (Resident 89). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 6) did not leave Resident 89 unsupervised when Resident 89 needed his soiled incontinence brief changed and left the resident's room to collect items for incontinence care. 2. Ensure CNA 6 followed the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Answering the Call Light to summon other staff help by using the call light for assistance to get incontinence care items when CNA 6 was in the Resident 89's room. 3. Ensure Resident 89's room was changed closer to the nursing station for a closer observation/visibility as care planned. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 89 attempting to remove his soiled incontinence brief (diaper) himself and fall out of bed sustaining a left hip fracture and subsequent transfer to a General Acute Care Hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor, document and record the intake and output ([I&O] the measurement and recording of all fluids entering and leaving the body over a specific period)for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with an indwelling urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine).This deficient practice resulted in the inability to determine if Resident 1's was hydrated appropriately and had the potential for fluid overload and/or infection to go unrecognized. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a urinary tract infection ([UTI] an infection in the bladder/urinary tract).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 6/27/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) 1 accurately documented one of three sampled resident's (Resident 1) blood glucose (the main sugar found in the bloodstream) results. This deficient practice resulted in an inaccurate portrayal of Resident 1's clinical status and the potential to result in unnecessary treatment and care. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 6/27/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition was moderately impaired. Resident 1 required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with toilet hygiene, shower/bath, upper and lower body dressing.During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) medication as ordered by his physician when Resident 1 did not receive Refresh Liquigel Ophthalmic Gel 1 % (a thick, gel-like eye drop solution, often called artificial tears) in both eyes at bedtime for dry eyes.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not receiving Refresh Liquigel Ophthalmic Gel 1 % as ordered and had the potential for Resident 1 to experience dry eyes.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 12/4/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition (ability to think and reason) was intact required substantial/ maximal assistance (helper does less than half the effort) from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light devices were within reach for three of 26 sampled residents (Residents 7, 100, and 121).This deficient practice had the potential for residents not being unable to summon health care workers for assistance as needed. a. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (weakness to one side of the body) and hemiparesis (inability to move one side of the body) affecting left dominant side, stiffness of left shoulder, elbow, and hand, and history of falling. During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a resident assessment tool) dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident 7 was dependent on chair/bed-to-chair transfer, lying to sitting, required maximal assistance (provide more than half the effort) for toileting hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a consent form for the use of an abdominal binder (belt used to support the abdomen after surgery, improve physical function), complete the restraint assessment, and monitor the use of abdominal binder for one of 26 sample residents (Resident 121). These deficient practices resulted in unnecessary restraint and placed the residents at risk of physical harm, skin injuries, or entrapment.During a review of Resident 121s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 121 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 121's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident specific care plan for two out of seven sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 13). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 9 and Resident 13 to not receive person-centered care. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (unable to move one side of the body) and a contracture (a permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, or skin that causes joints to become stiff and short, restricting movement) of the left hand. During a review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 9/11/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 13 had severe cognitive impairment (a significant loss of mental ability, such as memory, thinking, and reasoning, that prevents a person from living independently and often requires substantial supervision) and had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's licensed nursing staff failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards for two of two sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 125) reviewed for unnecessary medications by failing to rotate (a method to ensure repeated injections are not administered in the same area) subcutaneous (beneath the skin) insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) administration sites. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse effect (unwanted, unintended result) of same site subcutaneous administration of insulin such as excessive bruising, lipodystrophy (abnormal distribution of fat) and impaired blood sugar control. Findings:a. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/6/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 10 sampled residents (Residents 101, 55, and 113) received appropriate services to prevent a decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) and mobility by failing to:1a. Provide Resident 101 with a Physical Therapy (PT, profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) evaluation and assessment prior to increasing the wear time for both knee splints (rigid material or apparatus used to support and immobilize a broken bone or impaired joint) from 30 minutes to two to four hours during Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) treatment.1b. Objectively measure Resident 101's ROM in both legs during the PT Evaluation dated 7/13/2025.2a. Objectively measure Resident 55's ROM in the right leg during the PT Evaluation dated 9/26/2025.2b. Objectively measure Resident 55's ROM in the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the urine (liquid waste product made by the kidneys, stored in the bladder, and expelled from the body through the urethra) output for two out of two sampled Residents (Resident 15 and Resident 121) who had indwelling urinary catheters (a thin tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine continuously into a collection bag).This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay in addressing Resident 15 and Resident 121's overall hydration status (the process of replenishing water in the body), kidney function (how well the kidneys are working), and fluid balance (the body's regulation of fluid intake versus output to maintain stable hydration and electrolyte levels for essential bodily functions) issues.Findings: A. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility 9/22/2025 with diagnoses of history of malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of the large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the gastrostomy tube (GT - an opening to the stomach from the abdominal wall made surgically for the introduction of food) feeding formula was provided and documented as physician ordered for two of three sampled residents (Resident 28 and Resident 2).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 28 and Resident 2 receiving inaccurate amounts of GT feeding formula that could lead to unintended weight loss. Findings:a. During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), and cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting left side of body. During a review of Resident 28's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/6/2025, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two resident's (Resident 20) Bilevel positive airway pressure ([BIPAP] type of noninvasive ventilation that helps you breathe) machine was maintained as indicated in facility policy and indicated in the BIPAP User Guide. The deficient practices had the potential to result in serious health risks such as bacterial growth and infection and potential damage to the device.Findings:During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 20 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD]a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and chronic respiratory failure (condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body).During a review of Resident 20's Minimum data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 9/26/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 20 had intact cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of one sampled Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 was competent and knowledgeable with a pureed (foods that are blended, mashed, or whipped to a smooth, lump-free, pudding-like consistency, which is easier to swallow and does not require chewing) texture diet when passing the meal tray to Resident 13. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 13 to aspirate (when something other than air gets into your airways) or for Resident 13 to lose weight because she was provided with a diet not consistent with her physician's orders. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (unable to move one side of the body) and a contracture (a permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, or skin that causes joints to become stiff and short, restricting movement) of the left hand. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure [NAME] (CK) 1 was competent in preparing pureed (foods that are blended, mashed, or whipped to a smooth, lump-free, pudding-like consistency, which is easier to swallow and does not require chewing) scrambled eggs and oatmeal.As a result of this deficient practice 27 residents who were on a puree diet were placed at risk for receiving eggs and oatmeal that were not completely smooth and without lumps which could lead to aspiration (when something other than air gets into your airways). Findings:During a review of the facility's Recipe titled, Pureed Eggs by Healthcare Menus Direct, LLC.2025, the recipe indicated to prepare eggs per recipe for eggs) and then puree the eggs on low speed (food processor or blender) to a paste consistency before adding any liquid then gradually add warm milk. The finished puree item should be smooth and free of lumps, hold its shape, while not being too firm or sticky. During a review of the facility's Recipe titled, Pureed Hot Cereal (Hot Cereal of Choice i.e. Oatmeal) by Healthcare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was at the correct temperature to one of three sampled residents (Resident 131).This deficient practice had the potential to result in loss of appetite and cause unplanned weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 131's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 131 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), gastroesophageal reflux disease (digestive disorder most often causes a burning and sometimes squeezing sensation in the mid-chest), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).During a review of Resident 131's Admit/Re-Admit Nursing Evaluation, dated 11/10/2025, the Evaluation indicated Resident 131 was alert and oriented. The Evaluation indicated Resident 131 needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 13) was provided with a puree diet as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 13 to aspirate (when something other than air gets into your airways) or for Resident 13 to lose weight because she was provided with a diet consistent with her physician's orders. Findings:During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (unable to move one side of the body) and a contracture (a permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, or skin that causes joints to become stiff and short, restricting movement) of the left hand.During a review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 9/11/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 13 had severe cognitive impairment (a significant loss of mental ability, such as memory, thinking, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under safe and sanitary conditions in one of one kitchen, by failing to:a) Ensure no staff personal belongings were in the kitchen preparation area.b) Ensure the sanitizer bucket was not in the food preparation sink while food was being prepared. c) Ensure the pancake, breakfast meat, and waffles holding temperature (temperature at which food is kept) on the steam table (specifically made for holding prepared foods at a consistent temperature) were checked prior to meal service.d) Ensure the ice machine was clean.e) Ensure two of three residents' (Resident 101 and 112) refrigerated personal food items were dated on when it was opened or procured.These deficient practices had the potential to result in contamination of food items that placed residents in high risk for food borne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) that can lead to hospitalization and a decline in health.Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for three of nine sampled residents (Resident 13, Resident 101, and Resident 113) when:a. Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA 1) documented he provided RNA feeding program (staff provide feeding assistance) assistance to Resident 13 for two meals, when he did not. b. RNA 1 documented Resident 101 wore both knee splints (rigid material or apparatus used to support and immobilize a broken bone or impaired joint) for two hours during Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) treatment on 11/18/2025 when Resident 101 wore both knee splints for 40 minutes to one hour.c. RNA weekly documentation did not accurately reflect Resident 113's ambulation distance from 8/3/2025 - 10/4/2025. These deficient practices resulted in inaccurate medical documentation for Resident 13, Resident 113, and Resident 101 and had the potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to: a. Perform hand hygiene when entering and exiting Resident 5's room.b. Replace Resident 96's tube feeding line when it was found on the floor without a cap. c. Implement and document control measures per water management policy and procedure.d. Monitor, document, and implement contact isolation precautions (infection control measures used to prevent the spread of germs by direct contact) for Resident 131. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms (living organisms that are too small to be seen with the naked eye) and increase the risk of infection for the residents. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia weakness to one side of the body) and hemiparesis (inability to move one side of the body) affecting right dominant side, gastrostomy (g-tube:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:a. 1.Administer the coronavirus vaccination for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). b. 2. Offer and educate coronavirus vaccinations for staff per facility's policy for three of five sampled employees. These failures had the potential to place all residents at risk for exposure to infection of coronavirus.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - loss of blood flow to a part of the brain). During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/18/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 5 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform one of two sampled residents (Resident 11) of the risks associated with repeated subcutaneous (beneath the skin) insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) injections administered in the same anatomical site.This deficient practice had the potential to limit Resident 11's ability to make informed decisions regarding treatment.Findings:During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/6/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed), and cataract (clouding of the eye's natural lens).During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when Resident 113's ambulation (walking or moving from one place to another) distance declined. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of care and further decline of ambulation. Findings: During a review of Resident 113's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 113 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), difficulty in walking, and pressure induced deep tissue damage (discolored skin over a bony prominence caused by prolonged, unrelieved pressure) of the sacral (base of the spine) region. During a review of Resident 113's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 113 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 113's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 9/23/2025, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the use of mirtazapine (a medication used to treat mental illness) was used to treat a medical condition diagnosed and documented in the medical record between 7/7/25 and 11/9/25 for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 9.)The deficient practice of using psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) to treat medical conditions without sufficient documentation of their diagnosis increased the risk that Resident 9 may have experienced adverse effects (unwanted or dangerous medication-related side effects) related to the use of mirtazapine.A review of Resident 9's admission Record, dated 11/20/25, indicated she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental illness characterized by excessive worry, fear, or panic strong enough to interfere in everyday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) assessment accurately reflected one of three sampled Residents (Resident 74). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 74's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 74 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder. During a review of Resident 74's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 74 had moderate cognitive (ability to learn, reason, remember, understand, and make decisions) impairment, required setup assistance when eating, required moderate assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for oral hygiene and upper body dressing, and was dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing, and lower body dressing. During a concurrent interview and record review 11/21/2025 at 9:55 a.m., with the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 11), who preferred not to have subcutaneous (beneath the skin) insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) injection sites rotated, to include individualized goals and interventions addressing resident preference and associated risks.This deficient practice placed Resident 11 at risk for skin tissue damage and inconsistent insulin absorption due to unmet care needs related to the absence of a revised, individualized care plan.Findings:During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/6/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of two sampled Residents (Resident 13) on the restorative nursing assistant (RNA) feeding program (staff provide feeding assistance) was supervised during two meals.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 13 to aspirate (when something other than air gets into your airways) or for Resident 13 to lose weight if she was not encouraged to consume the meal. Findings:During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (unable to move one side of the body) and a contracture (a permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, or skin that causes joints to become stiff and short, restricting movement) of the left hand.During a review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 9/11/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 13 had severe cognitive impairment (a significant loss of mental ability,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to discontinue an intravenous (IV, in the vein) catheter (flexible tube inserted into a vein to deliver fluids and medications into the blood stream) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 15 and Resident 121) per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Removal of a Peripheral IV (Over the needle, Peripheral Short) Catheter.As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 15 and Resident 121 were placed at risk for discomfort and infection at the IV site. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility 9/22/2025 with diagnoses including history of malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of the large intestine and type 2 diabetes (your body does not use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 9/25/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 15 had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 113) was assessed by a neurologist and wound doctor as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delay in the delivery of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 113's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 113 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), difficulty in walking, and pressure induced deep tissue damage (discolored skin over a bony prominence caused by prolonged, unrelieved pressure) of sacral (base of the spine) region. During a review of Resident 113's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 113 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 113's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 9/23/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the valproic acid level (a lab value used to determine the effectiveness of certain medications used to treat seizures) related to the use of Depakote (a medication used to treat seizure disorder) per the physician's order in one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 9.)The deficient practice of failing to monitor valproic acid levels for the use of Depakote according to the physician's instructions increased the risk that Resident 9 could have experienced seizures or adverse effects related to the use of Depakote possibly leading to medical complications resulting in hospitalization.A review of Resident 9's admission Record (a record containing diagnostic and demographic resident information), dated 11/20/25, indicated she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental illness characterized by excessive worry, fear, or panic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve regular texture toast to one of three sampled residents (Resident 98).The deficient practice had the potential to result in loss of appetite and cause unplanned weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 98's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 98 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), gastroesophageal reflux disease (digestive disorder most often causes a burning and sometimes squeezing sensation in the mid-chest), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).During a review of Resident 98's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 9/1/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 98 had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident 98 needed set-up assistance when eating.During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement (a contract in which a person agrees to settle future disputes with the facility outside of court, through a private, neutral decision-maker instead of a judge or jury) was explained in a language that a resident could understand for two of three sampled residents (Resident 78 and Resident 82).This deficient practice had the potential to limit Resident 78 and Resident 82's understanding of the binding arbitration agreement and their legal rights.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 78's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/11/2023, with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body).During a review of Resident 78's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 2) who was under hospice care (compassionate care for people who are near the end of life provided at the person's home or within a health care facility) was visited by hospice licensed nurses weekly per hospice care agreement.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 did not receiving hospice care as they agreed upon.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a condition in which the blood does not have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), and cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting right side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not adequately provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of both sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) by failing to: a. Follow the order as prescribed when the physician discontinued a Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (used to relieve pain severe enough to require opioid treatment and when other pain medicines did not work well enough or cannot be tolerated) 10-325miligram (mg-unit dose) and ordered 5-325mg dose for Resident 1. b. Follow the facility's policy requiring the controlled substances to be stored in the medication room in a locked container, separate from non-controlled medications. Instead, a bottle of Lorazepam Intensol (knowns as Ativan, is used to treat anxiety disorders) for Resident 2 was found stored unlocked in the refrigerator. c. Properly dispose of the discontinued narcotic medication from the refrigerator for Resident 2. These failures had the potential to result in unmet needs of residents, misuse, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions ([EBP] involve gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities for residents at risk for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms ([MDRO, bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics]) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a left thigh wound and required daily dressing (sterile pad or material placed directly on a wound to protect it from infection and to promote healing ) changes. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Treatment Nurse (TN) had the proper understanding of EBP and put on the appropriate personal protective equipment ([PPE] clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) prior to conducting Resident 1 ' s dressing change. 2. Ensure proper signage was placed outside Resident 1 ' s room indicating Resident 1 was on EBP. These deficient practices resulted in the TN not applying a gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were up to date as per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) regarding advance directives (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 18 and 83). These deficient practices violated the residents' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate an Advance Directive and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care in the event residents became incapacitated (unable to participate in a meaningful way in medical decisions) or unable to make medical decisions that would not be identified and/or carried out by the facility staff. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 18 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate information in the Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment for two of three sampled residents (Resident 81, and Resident 83). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inaccurate care and services for the residents due to inappropriate MDS assessment and care screening tool practices. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 81's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 81 was originally admitted on [DATE] with a re-admission date on 5/31/2023 with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (a condition that causes irregular and fast heartbeat in the heart), congestive heart failure ([CHF], when the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), type 2 diabetes mellitus ([DM], a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) , depression (sad mood disorder), dementia (a gradual decline in cognitive abilities such as thinking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to update and revise a fall risk care plan for two of three sampled residents (Resident 106 and 170). This deficient practice had the potential to place Residents 106 and 170 to be at risk for recurrent falls. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 106's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 106 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of acquired absence of the right leg above the knee (amputation), Lack of coordination, and difficulty walking. During a review of Resident 106 's history and physical (H&P) dated 9/13/202 4, the H&P indicated resident 106 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 106's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a Federally mandated assessment tool, dated 7/31/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 106 required substantial /maximum assistance (helper lifts and hold the trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort) with upper and lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow through Registered Dietitian (RD-a health professional who has special training in diet and nutrition)'s recommendations in a timely manner and failed to assess, monitor, and evaluate interventions to prevent two of nine sampled residents (Resident 42 and 79) from further weight loss by: A. Failing to ensure to monitor and assess Resident 42's weekly weights and intake of supplements, and obtain an order for Megestrol Acetate (a medication to treat loss of appetite and weight loss) in a timely manner as recommended by the RD. B. Failing to ensure Resident 79 received the boost glucose control (a nutritional drink designed to help people with type 2 diabetes [uncontrolled blood sugar] increase their nutrient consumption while maintaining their blood sugar levels) as recommended by the RD due to a significant weight loss. This failure resulted in placing Resident 42 and 79 at risk for continued weight loss. Findings: A. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were routinely trained and evaluated for competency related to their duties when: 1.Dietary Aid (DA2) and Dishwasher (DW) did not know the concentration strength of the chlorine sanitizer used in the dish machine (chlorine sanitizer a product that is used to reduce or eliminate pathogenic agents on surfaces). 2. Cook1 did not follow standardized recipes when preparing pureed diet and did not prepare enough zesty meat sauce to meet facility residents need. These deficient practices had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary food production that could place 109 residents in the facility who received food at risk for foodborne illness and 16 residents who received lumpy pureed spaghetti at risk for choking and meal dissatisfaction in 12 residents who did not receive the spaghetti and meat sauce. Findings: 1.During an observation in the dishwashing area on 10/6/2024 at 9:45AM, Dishwasher (DW) was wearing gloves and rinsing the dirty dishes then loading them inside the dishwasher.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the standardized recipes for lunch menu was followed on 10/6/2024 when: 1.Facility failed to ensure 16 residents on puree diet (The pureed diet provides foods that do not require chewing and are easily swallowed. All foods should be smooth and pureed to the consistency of pudding.) received spaghetti texture in form that meet their needs when the texture of the puree spaghetti was lumpy, not smooth and had large pieces of pasta present requiring chewing before swallowing. 2.The facility failed to follow lunch menu and portion sizes as written for residents on pureed diet. 16 residents on pureed diet received ½ cup of pureed meat sauce instead of 2/3 of cup per the food portion and serving guide. Residents on pureed diet did not receive the pureed garlic bread per the menu. These deficient practices had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, decreased nutritional intake, wight loss and increased choking risk for 16 residents who were on puree diet. Findings: 1.During an observation of the tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices when: 1. There was no soap available in the handwashing sink. 2. One plastic bag of sliced raw meat, and two logs of ground beef thawing on the rack with no thaw date. One open container of cottage cheese and one container of juice with no open date and previously prepared house shake stored in a large one-gallon milk container. 3. Food brought to residents from outside of the facility, were stored in the resident food refrigerator with no use by date. There were four tv dinners with manufactures instruction to store frozen was stored in the refrigerator with no use by date. These deficiencies had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food borne illness in 109 out of 111 residents who receive food from facility, including 28 residents who received house shake and residents who had food stored in the resident refrigerator. Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship program policy for four of five sampled residents (Resident 39,96, 37 and 42) when an antibiotic (a substance used to kill bacteria and to treat infections) did not meet McGeer Criteria (criteria used to determine appropriate use of antibiotics) for administration. This deficient practice had the potential to increase antibiotic resistance and provide antibiotics to the residents without justification. 1.During a review of Resident 39's admission record, the admission Record indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinsonism (condition that affects movement), Bullous Pemphigoid (rare skin disorder that causes large fluid filled blisters on the skin), and Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a Federally mandated assessment tool], dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure following up with an optometrist (health care providers who examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system, the eye and associated structures as well as diagnose related systemic conditions) visit in six months as recommended by the optometrist and referring to ophthalmologist (a specialist who can treat complex medical issues related to your eyes, and can perform corrective procedures or surgeries including cataracts [tissue that forms over the eye, causing vision loss) and glaucoma [built up pressure in the eye that causes gradual vision loss]) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 55). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 55 not receiving proper care to maintain and/or improve his vision. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 55 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmission was 4/2/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately account for one dose of a controlled medication (medications with a high potential for abuse) affecting Residents 10 in one of two inspected medication carts (West Station Cart 1.) This deficient practice increased the risk of diversion (any use other than that intended by the prescriber) of controlled mediations and the risk that Resident 10 could have received too much or too little medication due to lack of documentation possibly resulting in serious health complications requiring hospitalization. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview of [NAME] Station Cart 1, on 10/7/24 at 1:12 PM, with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) the following discrepancies were found between the Narcotic and Hypnotic Record (a log signed by the nurse with the date and time each time a controlled substance is given to a resident) and the medication card (a bubble pack from the dispensing pharmacy labeled with the resident's information that contains the individual doses of the medication): 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the consultant pharmacist's recommendation from 8/3/24 to consider a gradual dose reduction (GDR - a periodic attempt to manage a resident's behavioral issues with a lower dose of medication) related to the use of Depakene solution (a medication used to treat mood swings) in one of five sampled residents (Resident 65.) The deficient practice of failing to ensure the physician evaluated and responded to medication irregularities (potential issues with a resident's medication regimen) identified by the consultant pharmacist during the Medication Regimen Review (MRR - a monthly report from the consultant pharmacist identifying any medication irregularities in a resident's current medication regimen) increased the risk that Resident 65 could have experienced adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) related to their medication therapy possibly leading to impairment or decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to discontinue hydroxyzine (a medication used to treat itching and allergies) per the physician's order due to non-use in one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 40.) The deficient practice of failing to discontinue the use of hydroxyzine when Resident 40 was simultaneously using another medication to treat itching effectively could have increased the risk that Resident 40 may have experienced adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) related to the use of hydroxyzine possible resulting in a decline in her quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (a document containing diagnostic and demographic information), dated 10/8/24, indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a neurological condition causing muscle weakness.) During a review of Resident 40's History and Physical (H&P - a record of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a gradual dose reduction (GDR - a periodic attempt to manage a resident's behavioral issues with a lower dose of medication) related to the use of Depakene solution (a medication used to treat mood swings) or document a clinical rationale as to why an attempt would be contraindicated in one of five sampled residents (Resident 65.) The deficient practice of failing to perform or consider an GDR increased the risk Resident 65 could have experienced adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) related to Depakene therapy possibly leading to impairment or decline in their mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status. Findings: During a review of Resident 65's admission Record (a document containing diagnostic and demographic information), dated 10/8/24, indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized by mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the mental capacity (ability to make decisions) of one of three sampled residents (Resident 65) to sign a legaly binding document before indicating the Arbitration agreement (a contract indicating any disputes would be resolved within the facility rather than in court) was signed by Resident 65. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 65 not fully understanding their rights, to limit opportunity to initiate judicial proceedings that challenge unfavorable decisions. During a review of Resident 65's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sequalae (condition resulting from a prior disease or injury) of cerebral infarction (a loss of blood flow to part of the brain), bipolar disorder (mental disorder that causes extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels), anxiety disorder (uncontrollable feelings of fear and anxiety), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one of one resident (Resident 1) from misappropriation of property (deliberate misplacement exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident ' s belongings or money without the resident ' s consent) when Housekeeper 1 (HK 1) was running several personal errands procuring personal items, bringing the items to Resident 1, and cashing personal checks from Resident 1. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for misappropriation of property. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (kidney [organ that filters wastes and extra fluid from the body] failure), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel) and heart failure (heart cannot pump as it should). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: A. call light was functioning properly for one of five sampled residents (Resident 76). B. Call light was within reach for Resident 52 while up in Geriatric Chair(([Geri Chair]- a large, padded chair that is designed to help seniors with limited mobility) C. care was provided in a manner that maintain or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect for Resident 63. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 76 and Resident 52 not receiving necessary assistance when needed, experience loss of dignity, and loss of self-esteem due to inability to summon help with call lights. This deficient practice has the potential to affect Resident's 63 sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: A. During a record review of Resident 76's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses with fracture of right humerus (your upper arm bone is broken), dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately assess and monitor one of one sampled resident (Resident 73) during the use of a pommel cushion (blue cushion placed on a wheelchair) to prevent the resident from sliding. This deficient practice had the potential to result in entrapment and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 73's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia with behavioral disturbance (impaired ability to think or make decisions accompanied by behaviors such as agitation and depression), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar) with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD: long term condition where the kidneys do not work as well), anxiety, repeated falls, hypertension (high blood pressure) and cognitive communication deficit. During a review of Resident 73's Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a standardized assessment and care screening tool], dated 9/8/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR is guided by federal regulations that require all individuals being considered for admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility (NF) be screened prior to admission, to determine if the person has, or is suspected of having, a mental illness) ) screening was completed for two of five sampled residents (Resident 14 and Resident 22) who were diagnosed with mental disorder (MD). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 14 and 22, not receiving appropriate behavioral services Findings: During a record review of Resident 14's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety (feeling of fear, and uneasiness) disorder, bipolar disorder (mental illness that cause unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), and major depressive disorder (loss of pleasure or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 14, and Resident 57) were provided with a communication board and language translating service were readily available. These deficient practices lead the potential Resident 14 and 57 not communicating her needs effectively with staff and delay in care and services being rendered for Resident 14 and 57. Findings: a. During a record review of Resident 14's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage), and apraxia (loss of ability to carry out skilled movement and gestures). During a record review of Resident 14's History and Physical (H/P), dated 8/28/2023, the H/P indicated Resident 14 does not have the capacity to understand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure five vials of pens of insulin (a type of medication used to treat high blood sugar) requiring refrigeration were stored according to the manufacturer's requirements affecting Residents 5, 14 and 17 in one of two inspected medication carts (West Station Cart 2.) The deficient practices of failing to store medications per the manufacturers' requirements increased the risk that Residents 5, 14 and 17 could have received medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage possibly leading to health complications resulting in hospitalization. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 1:37 PM of [NAME] Station Cart 2 with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), the following medications were found either expired, stored in a manner contrary to their respective manufacturer's requirements, or not labeled with an open date as required by their respective manufacturer's specifications: 1. One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1.Cooked eggs, cooked bacon and ready to eat tofu were stored on the same shelf next to raw eggs and a carton of raw liquid eggs. Raw chicken was stored to thaw on shelf above raw marinated ground beef. This had the potential to cross contaminate food and result in food borne illness in 100 residents who received food from the kitchen. 2.Kitchen wash cloths/towel were stained and discolored, and dishware were chipped. Staff using discolored and stained wash cloths to clean food contact surfaces. 3.Cook1 did not wash hands after removing soiled gloved and returned to food prepare vegetables and rice. Dishwasher staff working in the dish machine area did not wash hands after changing gloves and when removing the clean and sanitized dishes from the dish machine. 4.Ice machine was not maintained in a sanitary manner and the inside compartment of ice machine was stained and dirty. 5. Food brought to residents from outside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the electric hi-low therapy mat (therapy mat, electric and adjustable padded mat table used for therapy treatments) was in safe, operating condition. This deficient practice had the potential to cause injury to any resident or staff member who used this equipment as part of therapy treatment. Findings: During an observation on 10/4/2023 at 2:55 pm, in the rehab gym, a padded therapy mat was observed against the window of the rehab gym. The button controls to adjust the therapy mat height up and down were centered and attached to the base of the therapy mat frame. During an observation and interview on 10/5/2023 at 10:00 am, in the rehab gym, the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) who was also a Physical Therapist(PT- movement experts who improve quality of life through prescribed exercise, hands-on care, and patient education) confirmed the height of the therapy mat could not be adjusted because it was broken. The DOR stated the therapy mat was always left unplugged because the motor that controlled the height of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were provided mandatory (required by law or rules) minimum 12 hours per year in-service training of Dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) Care and Abuse (treat a person with cruelty or violence, especially regularly or repeatedly). This failure had the potential to result in the residents being subject to abuse, and residents who had dementia improperly cared for. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/6/2023, at 4:38 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA 8's In-Service Attendance Log for Abuse and Dementia Care (IALAD), dated from 1/2022 to 10/2023 was reviewed. The IALAD indicated, there were four abuse in-service trainings done on 2/17/2022, 5/18/2022, 7/7/2022, 12/5/2022 and three dementia care in-service trainings done on 3/15/2022, 4/21/2022, 9/8/2022. The IALAD indicated, there were five abuse in-service trainings done on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to sure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate) was discussed and written information was provided to the residents /or responsible parties for one of five sampled residents (Resident 22). This deficient practice violated the resident's right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care. Finding: During a record review of Resident 22's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), hypertension (high blood pressure), and schizoaffective (mental health disorder affect mood, behavior, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 96) was reviewed for changes in Medicare (federal health insurance for people 65 or older) coverage were provided with the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) appeal process in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 96 and/or responsible party not being able to exercise their right to file an appeal. Findings: During a review of Resident 96's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and anxiety (persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). During a record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 57) was reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not receiving appropriate care or delay in treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 57's admission Record (Face sheet) indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms) encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function or structure) unspecified dementia (dementia without a specific diagnosis), and anxiety (persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). During a review of Resident 57 Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized comprehensive assessment and care-screening tool, dated 7/20/2023, indicated Resident 57 has schizoaffective disorder, encephalopathy, unspecified dementia, and anxiety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 13) who has decreased hearing. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated resident 13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus with other specified complications (high blood sugar ) , hypertension ( high blood pressure), bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee ( when the cartilage that lines your joints is worn down ). During a review of Resident 13's history and physical (H&P) report dated 6/3/2015, the H&P indicated Resident 13 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set ( MDS -a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 1/1/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 13 requires limited assistance ( physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and implement the comprehensive care plan for one of one sampled resident (Residents 73) who sustained a fall from his wheelchair. This failure resulted in Resident 73 sustaining an injury from the actual fall. Findings: During a review of Resident 73's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia with behavioral disturbance (impaired ability to think or make decisions accompanied by behaviors such as agitation and depression), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar) with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD: long term condition where the kidneys do not work as well), anxiety, repeated falls and hypertension (high blood pressure) . During a review of Resident 73's Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a standardized assessment and care screening tool], dated 9/8/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 73's cognitive skills (the mental action or process of acquiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for foot care for one of one sample resident (Resident 97). This deficient practice had the potential for placing the resident at risk for complications such as infection or bleeding of the feet. Finding: During a review of Resident 97's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and partial weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (impaired blood flow to the brain) affecting the left non-dominant side, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), cerebral aneurysm (bulging of the vessel that supplied to the brain) nonruptered, muscle weakness, contracture on the left hand, abnormalities of gait and mobility, Type II Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar without complications), and anxiety. During a review of Resident 97's Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately account for the use of one dose of a controlled substance (medications with a high potential for abuse) affecting Resident 17 in one of two inspected medication carts (West Station Cart 2). This deficient practice increased the risk that Resident 17 could have received too much or too little medication due to lack of documentation possibly resulting in serious health complications requiring hospitalization. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview of [NAME] Station Cart 2, on 10/4/23 at 1:37 PM, with the Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN 2), the following discrepancies were found between the Narcotic and Hypnotic Record (a log signed by the nurse with the date and time each time a controlled substance is given to a resident) and the medication card (a bubble pack from the dispensing pharmacy labeled with the resident's information that contains the individual doses of the medication): 1. Resident 17's Narcotic and Hypnotic Record for clonazepam (a medication used to treat mental illness)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to enter or clarify a prescriber's order to reduce the dose of Seroquel (a medication used to treat mental illness) between 9/20/23 and 10/5/23 for one of five sampled residents (Resident 52.) As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 52 received a higher than necessary dose of Seroquel between 9/20/23 and 10/5/23 which increased the risk that he could have experienced adverse effects (unwanted side effects of medication therapy like drowsiness or constipation) related to the use of Seroquel leading to a decline in his quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 52's admission Record (a document containing a resident's demographic and diagnostic information), dated 10/5/23, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thoughts and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality.) A review of Resident 52's Order Summary Report (a document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 55 was assisted and provided with additional nutritive packets to have a therapeutic diet (a prescribed meal plan that controls certain aspects of nutrients and/or foods as part of a treatment plan) as ordered by the physician during Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) feeding program (a feeding assistant program to restore residents to a former capacity or to improve their level of independence and thereby promote improved nutrition status) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 55). This failure had the potential to result in preventing Resident 55 from receiving benefit of a therapeutic diet. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 55's diagnosis included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper adaptive eating utensils (AE, eating equipment such as forks, knives, and spoons that are modified to increase independence with eating) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 69) by failing to: 1. Follow physician's orders for AE. 2. Perform an assessment to determine the AE provided to Resident 69 was suitable and effective. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 69 being issued built-up utensils (eating utensils with large handles made from hard plastic or soft foam to allow a person with limited grasp or hand strength to hold utensils with more ease) instead of weighted utensils (eating utensils with large handles with weights inside that help reduce tremors and improve control while eating) per physician's order for meals and had the potential to cause weight loss, decreased independence with self-feeding, and decreased quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 69's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 69 on 7/20/2021. Resident 69's diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$19,475 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $19,475 — penalty dated 2023-10-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CHARIS TRUST DTD 12/22/16 — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 5.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KANESHIRO, BRANDIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 12/01/2006 |
| MARTINEZ, MARIA ELIZABETH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 12/01/2006 |
| CHARIS TR DTD 12/22/2016 | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/22/2016 |
| DAVID, EMMANUEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 12/01/2006 |
| DEL ROSARIO, EVELYN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| STEVE, DENISE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| ALEGRE, NESTOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| WAN, CHOK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/15/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $313K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056164. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.