Harbor Post Acute Care Center
21521 S. Vermont Avenue, Torrance, CA 90502 · For profit - Corporation · 127 certified beds · (310) 320-0961 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.54 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.80 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.4%CMS range 35.5–59.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.9–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 76.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 6.1–13.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.51 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 110.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 did not pinch the face or pull the hair of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) while providing care to her on 3/23/2026. Following the allegation of abuse Resident 1 was not protected from CNA 1 during the investigation of her allegations. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 being fearful of CNA 1 who was then allowed to participate in a meeting where Resident 1 was present to discuss her allegations of abuse. These deficient practices compromised the integrity of the investigation, did not provide protective measures to Resident 1 during the investigation, minimized the severity of the allegations, and placed Resident 1 at risk for continued abuse, intimidation, guilt and fear of retaliation.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), when on 3/23/2026 one of three sampled resident's (Resident 1) Responsible Party (RP) notified the Administrator (ADM) that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 pulled Resident 1's hair, pinched her face and placed a pillow over her head (3/22/2026) causing Resident 1 to be afraid of CNA 1. These deficient practices resulted in a delay in CDPH's investigation and had the potential for information pertinent to the allegations and investigation to be lost and/or forgotten.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 had diagnoses including depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness or loss of interest), anxiety (feelings of fear, dread, or unease, often accompanied by physical symptoms like a rapid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 was not assigned to a resident (Resident 1) after Resident 1 requested not to receive care from CNA 1 for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to upset and cause emotional distress to Resident 1. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified anxiety disordered (a mental health condition characterized by persistent and extreme worry) and insomnia (trouble falling asleep or staying asleep). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 10/31/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required substantial/maximum assistance (helper does more than half the effort) from staff with toileting hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when:1. 1 box of Boost (nutritional drink)supplement with 19 brick pack remaining were stored in the dry storage area with no date and label.2. 1 box of chocolate fat free ice cream with 26 cups remaining were stored in freezer #1 with no date and label.3. 1 box of [NAME] house honey wheat roll dough were stored in freezer #1 with no date and label.4. 1 box of liquid whole eggs pasteurized with 11 brick pack remaining were stored in refrigerator #1 with no date and label. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness in 101 out of 106 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/12/2025 at 8:22 a.m., with Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) in the dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to:Ensure a comprehensive water management program was in place.Ensure the Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) including standards, polices, and procedures were current, based on national standards, and reviewed at least annually.Ensure gloves were worn while disinfecting the bedside table and prepping wound care supplies for one of one sampled resident (Resident 5).These deficient practices had the potential for staff to follow outdated policies, placing residents and staff at risk for cross contamination and transmission of diseases within the facility.Findings: 1. During a review of the facility’s Water Management Program binder provided by the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), the Water Management Program binder only contained the results of randomly selected water samples collected in the facility to test for Legionella (a bacteria that causes a severe form of infection in the lungs). During a review of the maintenance binder from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure beneficiary notices were accurately completed for two of 3 sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 30).This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents and/or their responsible parties not being notified of the cost of services per day after benefits expired.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 18's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), type 2 diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and osteoarthritis (a common joint disease that involves the breakdown of cartilage and underlying bone in joints). During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Date Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) was completed accurately for two of 24 sampled residents (Residents 7 and 22) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 7's Neurontin (a medication used primarily used as anticonvulsant and for treatment of certain types of nerve pain) were encoded as anti-convulsant in the MDS assessment under Section N (N0415(k) High-Risk Drug Classes) medication. 2. Ensure Resident 22 had accurate documentation in the MDS assessment to reflect the use of Depakote ([anti-convulsant]- medication that controls abnormal electrical activity in the brain). This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Residents 7 and 22).Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 22’s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure care plan intervention was implemented to monitor signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection ([UTI] - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 75) who had a foley catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine). This deficient practice placed Resident 75 at risk for unidentified UTI that would lead potentially to life-threatening condition. Findings:During a review of Resident 75's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains basic information of the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 75 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 75's diagnoses included obstructive uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract that prevents normal urine flow), malignant neoplasm of bladder (type of cancer that develops in the bladder, the organ that stores urine), and generalized muscle weakness. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure medications were not left at the bedside for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1's not taking his prescribed medications that would lead to medical complications. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains basic information of the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease ([ESRD] - irreversible kidney failure), hemodialysis ([HD] - a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through machine when the kidney(s) have failed), and dementia (a progressive state od decline in mental abilities). During a review of review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/28/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 had fluctuating capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of one resident (Resident103) with resident-centered activities consistent with the resident's care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 103 expressing feelings of sadness and isolation. Findings:During a review of Resident 103's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/17/2024, and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including of cerebral infarction (brain tissue dies due to lack of blood supply), cardiac arrest (loss of heart function, breathing and consciousness), anoxic brain damage (brain deprived of oxygen) aphasia (difficulty speaking) and scoliosis (curvature of the spine).During a review of Resident 103's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/23/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 103 had the capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 103's Activities Care Plan dated 8/04/2025, Resident 103 liked watching TV,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 10) had a low air loss mattress on the appropriate setting.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 10 to develop a pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence).Findings:During a review of Resident 10's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the bladder (bladder cancer), absence of right upper limb below elbow, osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and intervertebral disc degeneration (a condition where the spinal discs, which act as cushions between vertebrae, break down and lose their ability to absorb shock effectively).During a review of Resident 10's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/10/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 34) oxygen delivery equipment was labeled and changed in accordance with the current accepted professional standards of practice. 2. Ensure one of five sampled residents' (Resident 59) tubing for the nebulizer machine (medical device that converts liquid medication into a fine mist, allowing it to be inhaled directly into the lungs) was changed every seven days per facility protocol. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 34 and Resident 59 to experience complications such as infection associated with oxygen therapy.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 34’s Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 34 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure), and anemia (a condition where the body does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective pain management on one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) by failing to:1. Ensure Resident 14's pain level was assessed after administering pain medication. This deficient practice placed Resident 14 at risk for inadequate pain relief and delay of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains basic information of the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 14 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 14's diagnoses included chronic (something that continues over an extended period of time) back pain, generalized osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 14's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/3/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 14 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received hemodialysis ([HD] - a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) treatment received care in accordance with standards of practice for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to:1. Communicate to dialysis center staff regarding Resident 1's change of condition. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay or lack of coordination of dialysis care and services to Resident 1. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains basic information of the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease ([ESRD] - irreversible kidney failure), hemodialysis ([HD] - a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 3) received Furosemide ([diuretic]- medication used to remove excess fluid from the body) by the route ordered by the physician.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 3 to have an adverse effect (bad outcome) after receiving the medication.During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling) and obesity.During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/30/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 3 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 7/22/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 3 had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 27) had a Hemoglobin A1C ([HgA1C] - a blood test that measures the average blood sugar level over the past two to three months) completed every three months per physician's order.This deficient practice resulted in inadequate monitoring of Resident 27's diabetes ([DM]- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident 27's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 7/25/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 27 was able to express ideas/wants and able to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 27 was dependent (helper does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize severe weight loss that was experienced by one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 went from 92 pounds (lbs.), on 4/7/2025 to 72.75 lbs. on 5/5/2025 (a weight loss of 19.25 lbs. in less than a month). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure there were no discrepancies in the calculation of the percentage of food Resident 1 consumed between 4/14/2025 and 5/4/2025 when the Weekly Summary Nurse Progress Note indicated Resident 1's food intake was between 51% to 100% versus the Document Survey Report that indicated Resident 1's food intake was 38.9% to 71.4%. 2. Follow Resident 1's Care Plan interventions to monitor Resident 1's weight loss/gain of three lbs. in a week and five lbs. in one month. 3. Notify Resident 1's physician and the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) 1 of Resident 1's poor dietary intake resulting in a severe weight loss of 19.25 lbs. in less than 30 days. 4. Give clear instructions on how to calculate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a medication, Tacrolimus (a drug that suppresses the immune system to prevent organ rejection), as ordered by a physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1, who was a lung transplant (a surgical procedure where one or both of a resident's diseased or damaged lungs were replaced with healthy lungs from a deceased donor) recipient, not receiving Tacrolimus and had the potential to cause harm/rejection to Resident 1's transplanted lung. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of lung transplant status. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 1 had mild cognitive impairment (a brain condition that causes noticeable but mild memory and thinking problems). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed the volume on their call lights was not turned down and audible. to ensure one of the facility's call light system was efficiently functioning. On 2/19/2025, the call light system in one of two nursing stations in the facility was not audible in Resident 3's care area and the facility's hallways. This deficient practice resulted in the facility's call light system not being audible in Resident 3's care areas and throughout the hallway. This deficient practice had the potential for the Resident 3's care needs to be neglected. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (a life threatening condition that occurs when the heart suddenly can't pump enough blood not the body) and chronic respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult for a person to breathe on his/her own). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) who was transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 1/21/2025 due to shortness of breath (SOB) was readmitted to the facility when the GACH cleared him to return to the facility on 1/31/2025. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 remaining at a GACH for 22 days beyond the date the GACH attempted to transfer him back to the facility. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1's continuity of care to be interrupted. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (a life threatening condition that occurs when the heart suddenly can't pump enough blood not the body) and chronic respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult for a person to breathe on his/her own). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report a resident-to-resident altercation to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (an agency that assist residents in long-term care facilities with issues related to day-to-day care, health, safety, and personal preferences) within the regulated time frame of two hours, for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This deficient practice resulted in CDPH ' s inability to investigate the allegations of abuse timely and had the potential for other allegations of abuse to go unreported. a. During a review of the Resident 1 ' s admission record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (a stroke caused by a ruptured blood vessel), hemiplegia (severe muscle weakness) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following cerebrovascular disease (group of disorders that affect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedure by failing to investigate a resident-to-resident altercation between two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility and failure to protect residents from ongoing or further abuse. a. During a review of the Resident 1 ' s admission record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (a stroke caused by a ruptured blood vessel), hemiplegia (severe muscle weakness) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following cerebrovascular disease (group of disorders that affect blood supply to the brain) affecting the dominant right side, frontal lobe (responsible for functions ex: emotions, memory) and executive function (set of cognitive skills that helps control behavior) following cerebral infarction (disruption of blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow one of three residents ' (Resident 1) care plan, when Restorative Nursing Assistant 1 (RNA 1) transferred Resident 1 from the wheelchair to the bed by himself. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 1 to experience a fall or injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis including hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (inability to move one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 7/25/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 ' s cognition (the mental processes that take place in the brain, including thinking, attention, language, learning, memory and perception) was intact and required substantial/ maximal assistance (helper does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of microorganisms (an organism that can be seen only through a microscope) that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food, as well as toxins) for 106 out 108 total residents in the facility by not: A. Ensuring Foods were dated, labeled, and discarded before the used by date (expiration dates). B. Ensuring Dietary Aid (DA) 2 performed hand hygiene (washing hands) and changed gloves between tasks during tray line (Resident's trays are assembled and check for accuracy before food is delivered to them). C. Ensuring [NAME] 2 took off her wristwatch that was not covered with gloves during tray line. These failures had the potential to affect residents and result in pathogen (germ) exposure and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality for four of 24 sampled residents (Resident 26,27, and 213). The facility failed to: a. Ensure privacy curtain was drawn while providing care with Resident 26 and 27. b. Ensure Resident 213 indwelling urinary bag was covered completely with a privacy bag. These deficient practices had the potential to feel embarrassed and affect the self-esteem, self-worth, sense of independence and psychosocial well-being for Resident 26,27, and 213. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 26's admission Order, the admission Record indicated Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to process glucose (sugar) correctly ), heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure call light was within reach for two of three sampled residents (Resident 12 and Resident 16). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 12 and 16 not to receive necessary assistance when needed, and experienced loss of self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Order, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to process glucose (sugar) correctly), unspecified dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities), and anxiety disorder (excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness). During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 04/02/2024 indicated Resident 16 had severe cognitive (ability to learn, understand, and make decisions) impairment and requires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) assessment was transmitted within 14 days after completion for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident 69 and 83). This deficient practice had the potential to the delay in identifying resident care concerns needing individualized care plan, delay in providing residents interventions necessary to provide quality care and delay in the reimbursement process. Findings: During a review of MDS submission form for Resident 69 dated 05/16/2024 and Resident 83 dated 06/24/2024, indicated the assessment completion was late and it was more than fourteen days beyond what was required. During an interview on 08/07/2024 at 1:48 p.m., the MDS Coordinator stated Resident 69 and 83's MDS discharge assessment from the hospital was submitted after fourteen days and the regulation requires to submit within fourteen days. The MDS Coordinator admitted that there was a late submission of Resident 69 and 83's discharge assessment. MDS Coordinator stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide social services to three out of five sample residents (Resident 37, 93 and 94) by: a Failing to follow up on the advanced directive for Resident 37. b. Failed to follow up with dentures for Resident 93. c. Ensure Resident 94 was seen by a podiatrist (a provider who specializes in caring for the feet, ankles, and lower legs). This deficient practice had the potential to cause conflict with a resident's wishes regarding healthcare, delay the delivery of care and services, and affect the resident's psychosocial negatively. The failure of resident 94 not seen by podiatrist resulted in not having her toenail cut for six months and experience pain on her right 5th toe. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 37's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscular dystrophy (group of diseases that cause progressive weakness and muscle mass loss), traumatic brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately store medications that required refrigeration for two of two sampled residents (Resident 80 and 5). This deficient practice had the potential for loss of strength of the medications, and the potential for the residents to receive ineffective medication dosages. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 80's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 80 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type two (2) diabetes mellitus (DM: body has trouble controlling blood sugar)with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes), and anemia (not having enough healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout the body). During a review of Resident 80's Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a standardized assessment and care screening tool], dated 7/11/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 80's cognitive skills (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures by failing to: A. ensure gowns were worn for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 213) when changing bed linen and touching the urinary catheter bag (a receptacle that serves as a container or collector for urine as it leaves the body and passes through the catheter tube). B. remove gloves from the dispensing box before administering medication to Resident 25. C. Ensure placing correct isolation signage and following proper Personal Protective Equipment ([PPE]- equipment used to prevent or minimize exposure to hazards) requirement for Resident 62. These failures resulted in compromised infection control measures to prevent infectious disease among residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 4's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement antibiotic stewardship program (measures used by the facility to ensure antibiotics [drug to treat infection] are used only when necessary and appropriate) for three of four sampled residents (Resident 12, 78, and 100) This failure had the potential to put Resident 12,78 and 100 at risk for antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) and inappropriate use of antibiotic. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 12's admission record, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia (lung infection that causes the lungs to fill with fluid or pus leading to inflammation), difficulty walking, and localized edema (swelling caused by fluid building up in the body's tissues). During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/5/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled resident (Resident 90) was assessed for change of condition ([COC] a sudden, clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) or functional status which without immediate intervention, may result in complications or death) and physician informed when Resident 90 called 911 (a phone number used to contact emergency services) on [DATE], and [DATE]. This failure resulted in Resident 90 calling 911 and transferred to general acute care hospital (GACH) on [DATE] for abdominal pain and fecal impaction (large, hard mass of stool gets stuck in the rectum and cannot pass out). On [DATE] Resident 90 was hospitalized for stercoral colitis (a rare form of inflammatory colitis (inflammation in the colon, causing symptoms such as urgent, painful, runny, or bloody stools) that can develop as a result of chronic constipation (a problem with passing stool).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 12) received continues oxygen therapy via nasal canula) a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose). This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 12's breathing and could cause desaturation (low blood oxygen concentration) from not receiving adequate amount of oxygen and a fire hazard. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Order, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to process glucose (sugar) correctly ), heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), and schizoaffective disorder ( a mental health condition). During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic drugs (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) were not used unnecessarily for one of three sampled residents (Resident 24) by failing to ensure a resident did not receive routine and as needed psychotropic drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that was documented in the clinical record for Resident 24. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the use of unnecessary psychotropic drugs for Resident 24 and can lead to side effects and adverse consequences such as a decline in quality of life and functional capacity. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including a mental state in which you are confused, disoriented, and not able to think or remember clearly), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of a medication error rate of five percent or greater as evidenced by the identification of four medication errors out of 28 opportunities for errors, to yield a facility medication error rate of 10.71 percent for three of three randomly selected residents (Resident 90, 310, and 81). This deficient practice had the potential for increased pain, side effects, poor wound healing, and stomach irritation. Findings: During a review of Resident 90's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 90 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to gastroenteritis (inflammation that spreads from the stomach into the intestines, causing pain vomiting and diarrhea), colitis (swelling of inflammation of the large intestines), and myocardial infarction (a heart attack that occurs when blood flow deceases or stops in one of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three randomly selected residents (Resident 90, 310, and 81) by not administering Resident 90's lidocaine patch, by giving Resident 310 eyedrops in the wrong eye and by not giving Resident 81's calcium acetate with a meal. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 90 experiencing increased pain, Resident 310 had the potential to develop side effects from receiving eyedrop in the wrong eye and Resident 81 experiencing stomach irritation from not receiving calcium acetate with meals. Findings: During a review of Resident 90's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 90 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to gastroenteritis (inflammation that spreads from the stomach into the intestines, causing pain vomiting and diarrhea), colitis (swelling of inflammation of the large intestines), pancreatic cyst…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 87) food preferences were honored and documented. This failure resulted in Resident 87's not receiving food items of Resident 87's choice and preference. Findings: During a review of Resident 87s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 87 was admitted to the facility originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar), obesity, chronic kidney disease (the gradual loss of kidney function) and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). During a review of Resident 87's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/18/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 87 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 87's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, Resident 87 needed partial to moderate assistance with eating. The MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Social Service Policy & Procedure, Grievances which indicated that all facility grievance (complaint) investigations, should be initiated as soon as practicably possible, after the grievance is filed, for one of three sampled residents, Resident 1. This failure had the potential for an unaddressed and unresolved grievances and had the potential to affect the resident ' s quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of traumatic hemorrhage (a type of blood loss caused by blunt force) of left cerebrum (the largest part of the brain that is divided in two halves). A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/17/2024, indicated Resident 1 had the capacity (the ability to hold) to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (Minimum Data Set [MDS] a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was in reach for one out of three sampled Residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in or in an inability for Resident 2 to obtain necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission records the admission record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial ability to move part of the body) affecting the left dominant side. During a review of Resident 2's history and physical (H&P) dated 10/24/23, the H&P indicated Resident 2 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care planning tool) dated 2/20/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control program was implemented by conducting facility-wide response testing of Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19: a highly contagious infection, caused by a virus that can easily spread from person to person) for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 4) who had closed contact of confirmed COVID-19 case. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent early diagnosis of COVID-19 and possible continued spread of COVID-19 for all staff and residents in the facility. Findings: During a record review of Resident 4's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland does not release enough thyroid hormone into the bloodstream), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities, and hyperlipidemia (an elevated level of lipids-fats-in your blood). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. ensure one (1) out of eight (8) sample residents (Resident 15 ) are treated with respect and dignity by failing to knock and request permission before entering resident`s room ( Resident 15). b. to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of her individuality for two (2) out of the eight (8) sampled residents (Resident 14 and 24). The facility staff was observed standing over the resident while assisting them during a meal. These deficient practices had the potential to affect resident's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: a. During a review of the Resident's 15 admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 15 diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), cerebral infarct (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) morbid obesity (excessive body fat that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents and or their responsible parties information on Advance Directives (an individual's wishes regarding medical treatment) for two of nine sampled residents (75 & 344). This deficient practice had the potential for violating Resident 75 and 344 choices for medical care. Findings: During a review of resident's medical records, the following information was missing: Resident 75 (admitted on [DATE]), did not have an advance directive or a signature declining information on how to get an advance directive. Resident 344 (readmitted on [DATE]), did not have an advance directive or a signature declining information on how to get an advance directive. During an interview on 11/04/21 at 8:56 a.m. with the Social Service Director (SS1), SS1 stated upon admission an advance directive is offered if the resident has the mental capacity to understand the advance directive. SS1 also stated if the resident does not have the mental capacity the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that 11 multi dose medications had been discarded 90 days after date opened as per facility policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential for harm to residents due to the potential loss of strength of the medications, and the potential for the residents to receive ineffective medication dosages. 2. Ensure that six (6) insulin (medicine to lower blood sugar) for a resident had been discarded 28 days after date opened (Resident 1,15,19, and 29). This deficient practice had the potential for harm to residents due to the potential loss of strength of the medications, and the potential for the residents to receive ineffective medication dosages. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/3/2021, at 12:35 p.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 during an inspection of facility medication cart, the following multi dose medications remains in the medication cart 90 days after date opened.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. ensure dietary staff performed proper hand hygiene during tray line. b. ensure the food thermometers were sanitized after removing from one food item and inserting into another food item. c. ensure all food items stored in the kitchen dry storage room were labeled and dated. This deficient practice placed the facility residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings: a. During an observation on 11/2/21 at 12:00 p.m., in the kitchen during tray line, cook 1 removed his gloves and donned new gloves without washing his hands. During an observation on 11/2/21 at 12:05 p.m., in the kitchen during tray line, cook 1 used the same gloved hand to hold cooked chicken, and open the oven door. During an observation on 11/2/21 at 12:07 p.m., in the kitchen during tray line, cook 1 used the same gloves and knife to hold and cut cooked chicken and pork. Gloves were not changed, and knife was not cleaned. During an observation on 11/2/21 at 12:22 p.m., in the kitchen during tray line, cook 1 used gloved hand to open the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: After exit it was determined C and D were moved to F812 a. ensure staff properly used personal protective equipment (PPE) in yellow zone rooms. b. ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene while performing wound care treatment for Resident 45. c. facility failed to ensure licensed staff practiced hand hygiene after disinfecting a blood pressure cuff and stethoscope and after cleaning a blood glucose monitor (machine used to check blood sugar level) before donning (applying) gloves and touching one of one Resident's (17) fingers to perform a blood glucose test. d. facility failed to date and label one of one resident's (52) humidifier (used to add moisture to the oxygen) and oxygen tubing, per facility policy. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the cross contamination of residents' wounds, and the spread of diseases and infection. a. During an observation on 11/2/21 at 11:14 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a pest-free environment and an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of fruit flies in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to spread disease and cause food borne illness. Findings: During an observation on 11/2/2021, at 8:45 a.m., in the kitchen's dry storage room several (50-100) fruit flies were observed. Fruit flies were observed flying in the storage room, on the ceiling, on food containers, and on plastic storage bags. One fly was seen in the dishwashing area. During an interview on 11/2/2021 at 9:10 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) 1, DS 1 stated staff check for flies whenever deliveries are received and when food is retrieved for the storage room. DS 1 stated if flies are seen in the kitchen the dietary staff must notify the maintenance supervisor who arrange the pest control visits. During an observation on 11/3/2021, at 8:10 a.m., in the kitchen, 2-3 fruit flies were seen in the dry storage area. During an observation on 11/4/2021, at 12:35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0574 — isolatedThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of six alert residents (Residents 37, 52, and 65) in the Resident Council Meeting were informed of their rights to receive information from State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (agencies acting as client advocates), and to be informed of how to contact the agencies and to communicate with them when needed. This deficient practice had a potential to negatively impact residents' rights to be informed. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on November 3, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., at the Resident Council Meeting in the dining room, the residents in attendance were asked regarding their rights in the facility and how to contact the Ombudsman's office. During the Group Meeting three of six residents who attended stated they did not know how to contact their local Ombudsman. Residents 57 stated there was a poster in the activity room with the Ombudsman contact information, but it has been taken down. All four walls in the dining room were observed, there were no poster containing the Ombudsman…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six alert residents (Resident 37 and 52) in the Resident Council Meeting were informed of their rights on how to file a grievance. This deficient practice had a potential to negatively impact residents' rights to be informed. Findings: During an interview on November 3, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., at the Resident Council Meeting in the dining room the residents in attendance were asked regarding their rights in the facility and how to file a grievance. During the Group Meeting two of six residents who attended stated they did not know how to file a grievance. Also, Two of six residents stated they worried if they complained about care someone would get back at them. During an interview on November 5, 2021 at 12:58 p.m., with the Social Service Director (SS1), SS1 stated she is responsible for overseeing the grievance process. If a resident communicates a concern she investigates and follow through with the appropriate department on a resolution. On admission the grievance process is discussed with residents and or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents have the right to be free from neglect, physical, verbal, and mental abuse for one of eight (8) sampled residents (Residents 57). This deficient practice had Resident 57 feeling attacked, humiliated, and degraded. Findings: During a review of the Resident's 57 admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 57 diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), cerebral infarct (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) type 2 diabetes mellitus ( a condition in which the body fails to metabolize (process) glucose (sugar) correctly). During a review of Resident 57 's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 9/16/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 57 had no impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision making and no verbal behavior symptoms directed toward others. Resident 57…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline individualized care plan to reflect the assessment and meet the immediate needs that included interventions to address activities, or regular room visits, and ongoing programs to support the resident in their choice of activities for one of one sampled resident (Resident 89). This deficient practice had the potential to decrease the physical and cognitive ability and hinder the emotional health of Resident 89. Findings: During a review of Resident 89's admission record indicated resident 89 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed), hypertension (high blood pressure) seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat (arrhythmia) that can lead to blood clots), and weakness. During a review of Resident 89's Minimum Data Set (MDS-comprehensive screening tool) dated October 11, 2021, the MDS indicated Resident 89 was able to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and resident-centered care plan regarding Resident 's 16 continuous removal of her nasal cannula (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) with the interdisciplinary team. This deficient practice had a potential to result in respiratory distress. Findings: During a review of the Resident's 16 admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 16 diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] progressive disease that makes it hard to breath), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities). During a review of Resident 16 's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 8/4/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 16 had severe impairment in cognitive (ability to learn, remember, understand, and make decision)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide shower according to pre-determined schedule for one of two sampled residents (Resident 89), who was totally dependent on staff for ADL's. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 89 not receiving a shower for one month and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 89's self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 89's admission record indicated resident 89 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included subarachnoid hemorrhage (brain bleed), hypertension (high blood pressure) seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat (arrhythmia) that can lead to blood clots), and weakness During a review of Resident 89's Minimum Data Set (MDS-comprehensive screening tool) dated October 11, 2021, the MDS indicated Resident 89 was able to make herself understood and understand others usually. The resident is totally dependent on staff for Activities of Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan with measurable goals and interventions to address the care and treatment for one of one residents (34) with dementia. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Resident 34 from maintaining his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's medical record, the record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 34's diagnoses included: dementia (a progressive loss of brain function affecting memory, thinking, and behavior that interferes with daily functioning), a psychotic disorder (condition that affects the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality), and end stage renal failure (kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as they should). During a review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 9/1/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 34's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the time a controlled medication was removed from the narcotic drawer of the medication cart and failed to document immediately after the medication was given to one of one Residents (51). Licensed staff documented removing Vimpat (a schedule V controlled medication, which has a low potential for abuse relative to substances listed in Schedule IV and consist primarily of preparations containing limited quantities of certain narcotics; used to treat seizure disorders) from Resident 51's medication bubble pack in the controlled medication/narcotic drawer of the medication cart at 5 p.m. on 11/4/2021 but did not document in the electronic medical record until 8:17 p.m. on 11/4/2021. This deficient practice had the potential for loss of accountability, and the controls against narcotic drug loss, diversion, or theft. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/5/2021 at 7 a.m., of station 2 medication green cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (5%) or greater. As evidenced by the identification of two out of 31 medication opportunities (observations during medication administration) for error, to yield a cumulative error rate of 6.45% for two of five residents (Residents 17 and 8) observed during the medication administration facility task. a. For Resident 17, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to administer Novolog Insulin Aspart (medication to treat abnormal blood sugar) before meals and did not administer the medication according to manufacturer's recommendations. b. For Resident 8, the facility failed to administer Metformin HCL (for diabetes [disease in which blood glucose/blood sugar levels are too high]) within the correct timeframe as ordered. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harm to Residents 17 and 8 by not administering medication as prescribed by the physician in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to ensure a water pitcher was not provided at the bedside for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had a potential for Resident 22 to choke and aspirate. Findings: During a review of the Resident's 22 admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 22 diagnoses included Parkinson's ( a progressive brain disorder that affects movement ), dysphagia ( difficulty in swallowing ), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (not consuming enough protein and calories ). During a review of Resident 22 's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 11/02/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 22 had mild impairment in cognitive (ability to learn, remember, understand, and make decision) skills for daily decision making and no verbal behavior symptoms directed toward others. Resident 16 extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CHARIS TRUST DTD 12/22/16 — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 5.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMMANUEL AND OFELIA DAVID REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/25/2000 |
| DAVID, EMMANUEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2004 |
| DEL ROSARIO, EVELYN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| VILLALUZ, RAMONA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| DOMINGO, ANGELICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/1997 |
| PADRE, JED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056192. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.