St Andrews
2300 W. Washington Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90018 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (323) 731-0861 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 7.8–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 10.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.0–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.51 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 53.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.94 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fortified diets (meal plan that increases a resident's caloric intake by adding high calorie items) were prepared as prescribed by the physician for five of 10 sampled residents (Resident 16, Resident 21, Resident 42, Resident 46, and Resident 51).This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to meeting their nutritional needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/20/2025 with diagnoses including sepsis (a severe body wide infection that can lead to organ failure), unspecified protein-calories malnutrition (not getting enough calories and protein, leading to weight loss and weakness), vitamin D deficiency (low vitamin D levels that can weaken bones).During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/27/2021 with diagnoses including complete traumatic amputation of the two or more left lesser toes (surgical or injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was informed of the dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing) screening result for one of one sampled resident (Resident 54).This deficient practice violated the resident representative's right to be fully informed of Resident 54's plan of care and had the potential to result in a delay of care and services.Findings:During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 54 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 54's diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] - stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), dysphagia, and gastrostomy tube ([GT] - a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) placement.During a review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/19/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 54's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two physical restraints weren't simultaneously used for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 35).This deficient practice resulted in the use of unnecessary restraints and restricted Resident 35's movement.Findings:During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 35 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 35's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the kidney (kidney cancer), type 2 diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysarthria (a motor speech disorder caused by brain or nerve damage that weakens or paralyzes the muscles used for speech) and anarthria (the complete loss of the motor ability to articulate speech).During a review of Resident 35's history and physical (H&P) form, dated 4/7/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 35 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the use of lorazepam (brand name Ativan, a medication used to treat anxiety and aggressive behaviors) had an adequate indication for use for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 38).This deficient practice had the potential to result in the use of a chemical restraint which could cause oversedation for Resident 38.Findings:During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 38's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), type 2 diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and liver cirrhosis (the permanent scarring of the liver caused by long-term, chronic disease or injury).During a review of Resident 38's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) was coded accurately for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 47) by failing to ensure Resident 47's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected his serious mental illness (a health condition that affects a person's thinking, mood, behavior, or ability to relate to others).This deficient practice resulted in the transmission of inaccurate data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding Resident 47's health status and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Resident 47. Findings:During a review of Resident 47's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 47 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 47's diagnoses included personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders, hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, enlarged prostate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly IDT (Interdisciplinary Team- a group of people with different training and skills who work closely together to solve a complex problem or care for someone) meeting was conducted for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 12).This deficient practice resulted in staff not updating Resident 12's care plan.Findings:During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a temporary brain malfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the body), type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and acute kidney failure (the sudden loss of your kidneys' ability to filter waste products from your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a referral for cardiology (medical specialty focused on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases and disorders related to the heart and the cardiovascular system) was completed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 11).This deficient practice had the potential not to keep track of Resident 11's underlying heart disease that could result in the delay of necessary care and services.Findings:During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 11's diagnoses included chest pain, presence of cardiac pacemaker (medical device implanted to regulate heartbeats), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 4/23/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 11 was independent (decisions consistent and reasonable) in cognitive (ability to think and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a floor mat was placed by the bed as ordered for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 3).This deficient practice had the potential to result Resident 3 sustaining injuries during a fall.Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included lack of coordination, muscle weakness, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event)During a review of Resident 3's history and physical (H&P) form, dated 2/12/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 3 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 4/10/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 3's cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who has a suprapubic catheter (a thin, flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder) was changed monthly as per the physician's order for one of one sampled resident (Resident 9).This deficient practice had the potential to result in the recurrence of a urinary tract infection ([UTI] - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) that could develop into urosepsis (a potentially life-threatening complication of urinary tract infection).Findings:During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 9 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 9's diagnoses included obstructive reflux uropathy (a condition where a blockage in the urinary tract stops urine from leaving the body, forcing it to flow backward into the kidneys), urinary retention (inability to completely empty your bladder), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 3) with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) received Trauma Informed Care (TIC- an intervention and approach that focuses on how trauma may affect an individual's life and his or her response to behavioral health).This deficient practice had the potential to result in the staff's inability to identify possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to the past traumatic experience) for Resident 3.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included lack of coordination, muscle weakness, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 24) was free from unnecessary medications when:1. There were two physician orders for Acetaminophen ([Tylenol] used to relieve mild to moderate pain) with the same indication.2. Tramadol (prescription painkiller used to treat moderate to severe pain) was administered routinely without a clinical indication.This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication errors, overdose, and unnecessary use of opioid (prescription drugs used to treat moderate to severe pain and carry significant risks of addiction, dependence, and overdose.Findings:During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/7/2025 with diagnoses including severe protein calorie malnutrition (body lacks both enough energy calories and protein), anxiety disorder (mental health condition characterized by excessive worry about everyday situations), and major depressive disorder ([MDD] - a mood disorder that cause a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an unopened Gabapentin (an anticonvulsant drug used primarily to treat nerve pain and seizure) oral solution was stored inside the medication room refrigerator for one of one sampled resident (Resident 35).This deficient practice had the potential for the loss of efficacy of the Gabapentin oral solution that would cause ineffective pain management of Resident 35.Findings:During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 35 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 35's diagnoses included neuralgia (sharp and burning nerve pain), malignant neoplasm of the kidney (kidney cancer), Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and gastrostomy tube placement (GT, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident's (Resident 15) dislikes on the dietary card reflected the resident's preference.This deficient practice had the potential to result in dissatisfaction with meals leading to decreased intake and weight loss.Findings:During an observation in the kitchen on 6/3/2026 at 12:00 p.m., Resident 15's plastic dietary card indicated dislikes included rice. The resident's lunch tray was observed including chicken, bread, green vegetables and rice.During an interview with Resident 15 on 6/3/2026 at 12:05 p.m., Resident 15 stated that his lunch appeared fine, but he does not dislike rice. During an interview with Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS) on 6/3/2026 at 12:15 p.m., the DSS stated he was responsible for updating dietary cards per physician orders and resident preferences. The DSS stated Resident 15's dietary card was not updated. The DSS stated that discrepancies in dietary cards may result in residents receiving meals inconsistent with physician orders and/or individual preferences. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store, label and monitor food items for use when: Ravioli was kept in the freezer beyond use by date of 6/1/2026.Tamales was taken out of its original packaging and placed in a zip lock bag without use by date label.These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at risk for foodborne illness (an illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and other toxins).Findings:1.During an observation on 6/2/20206 at 8:19 a.m., reach-in freezer (Freezer 1) contained frozen ravioli stored in a zip lock bag labeled use by: 6/1/2026.During an interview on 6/2/26 at 2:37 p.m. with Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the DSS stated all food items removed from the original container must be labeled with use by date. The DSS stated the use by date was the last day residents can consume food items and food past the use by date was expired and must be discarded. The DSS stated consuming expired foods had the potential to cause residents to have stomach ache and illness. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Arbitration Agreement form (a legally binding contract where parties agree to resolve future disputes through a private, out-of-court arbitration process instead of suing in a traditional courtroom) was not signed by one of eight residents, (Resident 1), who had a responsible party (the individual designated to pay a patient's medical bills, manage their care decisions, or supervise daily support services), had cognitive impairment, did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions and who was legally blind (a government classification for significant vision impairment used to determine eligibility for disability benefits, tax exemptions, and rehabilitation services).This deficient practice had the potential that Resident 1 did not understand what he was signing and resulted in the arbitration agreement not explained to the resident's responsible party.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 5 sampled residents, Resident 1, who was on a pureed diet (foods modified to a soft, pudding-like consistency for residents who have difficulty chewing or swallowing solid foods), was not fed by an untrained facility staff (Recepitonist).This failure placed the resident at risk for choking and aspiration (the inhalation of foreign material, like food, liquid, or stomach contents, into the airway and lungs) of food, which could lead to resident injuries and hospitalization, including death.Findings: During an observation on 7/14/2025 at 12 noon, in the front lobby, the Receptionist was observed sitting in the hallway next to Resident 1 and fed him lunch of a puree textured diet. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including nausea and vomiting, cirrhosis of the liver (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection prevention and control measures for two of five sampled residents (Residents 3 and 4) by failing to perform hand hygiene (washing hands or using an alcohol-based sanitizer) before and after assisting Resident 3 and Resident 4 with their lunch meals. This failure had the potential to spread germs and increase the risk of infections among residents and staff. Findings:During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/14/2025 at 12:20 p.m. in the activity room, Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) 1 was observed sitting down between Resident 3 and Resident 4 during lunch. RNA 1 was observed assisting Resident 3 with using his fork while the resident was eating and feeding Resident 4 with a spoon and failed to perform hand hygiene before and after assisting the residents. RNA 1 stated he should not be assisting two residents at the same time and failing to perform hand hygiene before and after assisting each resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the staff failed to ensure the residents and/or responsible party (RP) were informed of an alleged abuse on 2/24/2025 and dentist visit on 3/10/2025 for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice led Resident 1 ' s responsible party feeling ignored and uninformed about the care of Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/11/2025, H&P indicated that Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident assessment tool), dated 1/29/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was sometimes able to understand and be understood by others. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required supervision for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to: 1. Ensure food items were labeled in Refrigerator 1, Refrigerator 2, Refrigerator 3 and Freezer 2 in the kitchen. 2. Ensure expired food was discarded from Refrigerator 2 in the kitchen. 3. Ensure a dented can sign was on display in the dry storage area. 4. Ensure the kitchen mixer and processer was clean. 5. Ensure the juice dispensing nozzle was clean. This deficient practice had the potential to result in in foodborne illness and contamination. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, of the initial kitchen tour, on 4/15/2025, at 8:44 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), an opened bag of parmesan cheese was noted to not have a dated label in Refrigerator #1. The DS stated food items in the refrigerator are required to have an open date. The DS stated the risk of not labeling the bag of parmesan cheese could result in residents consuming expired food. During a concurrent observation and interview,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and provide an updated average daily census of the Facility Assessment Tool (a process for evaluating a facility's resident population and identifying the resources needed to provide care and services). This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for delay of care and treatment services. Findings: During a review of the facility census for 4/15/2025, indicated 54 residents resided in the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/16/2025 at 8:21 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the Facility Assessment Tool, was reviewed. The ADM stated the Facility Assessment Tool was last updated on 12/6/2024. The ADM stated the assessment provided was an average daily census of 51 residents. The ADM stated the average daily census recorded on the Facility Assessment Tool did not match with the current census. The ADM stated the Facility Assessment Tool was not accurate because of the average daily census which is below the actual census. The ADM stated there were three residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance to one of three sampled residents (Resident 8) who had ill-fitting clothing, exposing the resident's buttocks. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 8's sense of self-worth and self- esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 8 on 5/15/2017 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (nerve damage in hands and feet) restless leg syndrome (an overwhelming urge to move legs often, accompanied by uncomfortable sensations in the legs), right hand, right elbow, left hand contractures (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces joint's range of motion), and polyosteoarthritis (arthritis that affects five or more joints…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to honor snack preferences for one of five sampled residents (Resident 34). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 34 not being able to make choices about his preference for food. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 34 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included obesity (the state or condition of being very fat or overweight), chronic pulmonary edema (a condition where there is a persistent buildup of fluid in the lungs, leading to difficulty breathing), type 2 diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body). During a review of Resident 34's physician orders, dated 12/7/2023, the physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician for one of three sampled resident (Resident 11) who was refusing range of motion (ROM- full movement potential of a joint where two bones meet) therapy. This failure had the potential for Resident 11 to decline in physical functioning and resulted in delayed continuity of care due to the physician not being notified in a timely manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 11 on 10/19/2011 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident (stroke), right hemiplegia(total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) left hip contracture (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion), and right hip contracture. During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 11 had severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party/Power of Attorney was notified of Medi-Cal approval for one of five sampled residents (Resident 46). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the responsible party not being able to make medical decisions for the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included myalgia (pain in a muscle or group of muscle), unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) and toxic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by toxic exposure). During a review of Resident 46's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Transmit the Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a resident assessment tool) within 14 days after completion to the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 53). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a billing error and inaccurate data on resident care needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 53's diagnoses included urinary tract infection ([UTI] - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), diabetes mellitus ([DM] - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] - stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain). During a review of Resident 53's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/28/2024, the H&P indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) assessment was completed accurately for two of 20 sampled residents (Resident 3 and 27) by failing to: 1. Esure Resident 3's Trazodone (medication used to treat depression) was not encoded as a hypnotic (a class of psychoactive drugs that treat insomnia and help people fall asleep) under MDS Section N (N0415 High-Risk Drug Classes) for medication. 2. Ensure Resident 27's weight loss was not encoded as significant weight loss (loss of 5 percent ([%] - out of each 100) or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6 months) under MDS Section K (K0300 Weight Loss). This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Resident 3 and 27. Findings: a). During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and re-submit the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASARR - a tool to determine if the person had, or was suspected of having a mental illness, intellectual disability, or related condition) Level one (I) screening and refer one of three sampled residents (Resident 33) who had a diagnoses of anxiety disorder (a condition that involves excessive and persistent feelings of fear, dread, and worry that can interfere with daily life) and major depressive disorder ([MDD] - a mood disorder that causes a persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest) to the appropriate state-designated authority for PASARR Level two (II) evaluation and determination. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 33 to not receive the appropriate medical treatments for mental illness diagnoses. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly obtain an accurate orthostatic blood pressure (a form of low blood pressure that happens when standing after sitting or lying down) readings for one of one sampled resident (Resident 10). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Residents 10 experiencing a delay in interventions if they were positive for orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure). Findings: During a review of Resident 10's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 10's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/8/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 10 had the ability to understand and make decisions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress settings were correct for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential to result in further skin breakdown. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included an unstageable pressure ulcer of the back (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence), pressure induced deep tissue damage (damage to the deeper layers of the skin and underlying tissues, like muscle and fat, caused by pressure), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and nausea (a feeling of sickness with an inclination to vomit). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS-?),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to prevent a decline in joint range of motion ([ROM] - full movement potential of a joint) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 50) who had limited range of motion by failing to: 1. Provide a left-hand roll (a device that prevents fingers from curling up tightly). This deficient practice had the potential to result in further decline in Resident 50's ROM and overall quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 50's diagnoses included a contracture (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) of the muscle of the left forearm, cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] - stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), and hypertension ([HTN] - high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a driver's license was renewed in a timely manner for one of five sampled residents (Resident 46). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in the delivery of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included myalgia (pain in a muscle or group of muscle), unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) and toxic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by toxic exposure). During a review of Resident 46's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/11/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 46's cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) did not receive an opened capsule of Duloxetine (a medication used for depression and nerve pain). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 3 to experience adverse effects due to the nurse not following the medication manufacturer's directions. Findings: During an observation on 4/17/2025 at 8:59 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 opened the Duloxetine Delayed Release (DR- allows the medication to bypass certain areas of the digestive system) 30 milligrams (mg- unit of measurement) Capsule, poured the contents into a medication cup, mixed it with apple sauce, and gave it to Resident 3 to take. A sticker on the Duloxetine Capsule indicated Do Not Crush. During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians orders to draw monthly labs for a Complete Blood Count (CBC), Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) and Keppra level for one of two sampled residents (Resident 25). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in care and services due to missing laboratory results. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which could cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys lose their ability to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of four sampled residents (Resident 2) had a Care Plan (a documentation that outlines a patient's care and is created by a nurse as part of the nursing process) for physical aggression (behavior causing or threatening physical harm towards others). This deficient practice of not having a Care Plan for physical aggression had the potential for Resident 2 to be physical aggressive again. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects a person's thoughts feelings, and behaviors), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings), major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder persistently sad mood or loss of interest in activities). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/21/2024, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician order was followed for one out of four sampled Residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice of not following physician orders placed the Resident 1 at risk for continuing aggressive behavior after an altercation (a noisy argument or quarrel between people which could include fighting). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included moderate intellectual disabilities (a level of intellectual disability that is characterized by an average mental age of six to nine years), osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone), functional quadriplegia (a mental health disorder persistently sad mood or loss of interest in activities). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/21/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered care plan for the use of foley catheter (flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag) for one of three residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in poor quality care on a resident with foley catheter, placing the resident at risk for urine infection and other catheter usage complications (blockage, sediments). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included end stage renal disease (medical condition where the kidneys permanently stop functioning and require dialysis or a kidney transplant to stay alive) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the fall prevention care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice increased the potential for avoidable physical harm to Resident 2 related to a repeat fall with possible injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 ' s admitting diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles), lack of coordination, and age-related osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/4/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2 did not have impaired cognition (when a person has trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented, as indicated in the care plan, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice increased the potential for avoidable physical harm to Resident 2 related to a repeat fall with possible injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 ' s admitting diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles), lack of coordination, and age-related osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle). During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/4/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2 did not have impaired cognition (when a person has trouble remembering, learning new things,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 failed to administer medications according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice created the potential for Resident 2 to take medications affecting his blood pressure and heart rate, without his blood pressure or heart rate being within the required range for safe administration. The failure also created the potential for Resident 2 ' s medications to be taken by a facility resident the medications were not ordered or intended for. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 ' s admitting diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage), lack of coordination,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify resident representative for one of four sampled resident ' s (Resident 1, after Resident 1 was found on the floor. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's representative not aware of the fall incident. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 5/2/2024, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [(COPD), a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe], dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions such as memory loss and judgement), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/2/2023, indicated Resident 1 was able to make decisions for activities of daily living and Resident 1 ' s son was the surrogate decisionmaker. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff supervision was provided to one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), who was left on the floor alone, after a fall, while the other staff called for assistance. This deficient practice had the potential to cause further injury to Resident 1 and Resident 2, who put Resident 1 back to bed. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 5/2/2024, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [(COPD), a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe], dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions such as memory loss and judgement), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/2/2023, indicated Resident 1 was able to make decisions for activities of daily living and Resident 1 ' s son was the surrogate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted to an inaccurate documentation for Resident 1 ' s incident. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 5/2/2024, indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [(COPD), a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe], dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions such as memory loss and judgement), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/2/2023, indicated Resident 1 was able to make decisions for activities of daily living and Resident 1 ' s son was the surrogate decisionmaker. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 2/16/2024, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to replace the non- antibiotic Emergency Kit (E-Kit) within 72 hours. This deficient practice had the potential for not providing medication to residents during emergency situations. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/2024 at 10:10 a.m., of the medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER] with Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2), found one portable container non-antibiotic medication E-Kit with prescription #3187400, with red seal tag. LVN 2 stated the portable container non-antibiotic medication E-Kit indicates a fill date of 2/13/2024. LVN 2 stated red seal tag means the E-Kit had been opened. LVN 2 stated yellow seal tag means the E-Kit had not been opened. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/27/2024 at 10:15 a.m., with LVN 2, Emergency Drug Supply Log Sheet was reviewed. LVN 2 stated the non-antibiotic medication E-Kit was opened on 4/16/2024. LVN 2 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled properly and expired food was not stored in the kitchen accessible to be used in preparing foods for 45 out of 51 residents. This practice had the potential to result in the residents ingesting expired food and can result in foodborne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 4/27/2024 at 8:10 a.m., with Dietary Aide 2 (DA 2), in Freezer #2, DA 2 observed 1 plastic bag of seasoned potato fries with an open date of 1/10/2024. DA 2 stated the seasoned potato fries were good for 3 months and should have been discarded on 4/10/2024. DA 2 discarded the bag of fries and stated the risk of having expired food could result in foodborne illnesses for residents. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 4/27/2024 at 8:30 a.m., with DA 2, in Refrigerator #2, DA 2 observed 3 opened bags of celery and 1 opened bag of flour tortillas with no received-by, open and/or used-by date. DA 2 stated the items were received 7 days ago and he forgot to label them. DA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document and maintain a temperature log of two out of two clothes dryers (dryer 1 and 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in spread of infection (the invasion of growth of germs in the body) throughout the facility. Findings: During an observation on 4/28/2024 at 7:55 a.m. at the laundry area, no temperature log was observed for the clothes dryer. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/28/2024 at 8:00 a.m., with laundry aide 1, two commercial front-loading clothes dryers were observed in the laundry room. The temperature gauge on clothes dryer #1 indicated 180 degrees Fahrenheit ([F] unit of measurement). The temperature gauge on clothes dryer #2 indicated 180 degrees F. LA 1 stated the facility does not monitor the temperature of the clothes dryers and there was no log to document the temperature of the clothes dryers. During an interview on 4/28/2024 at 8:41 a.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS stated LA 1 should monitor the temperature of the clothes dryer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a peripheral catheter ([IV], a thin tube inserted into a vein for therapeutic purposes such as administration of medications, fluids and/or blood products) dressing was dated for one of one sampled resident (Resident 152). This deficient practice had the potential for the IV insertion site to develop an infection and/or hospitalization for Resident 152. Findings: A review of Resident 152's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 152 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 152's diagnoses included urinary tract infection ([UTI], common infections that happen when bacteria, often from the skin or rectum, enter the urethra, and infect the urinary tract), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD], lung disease that causes blocked airflow from the lungs), and heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure respiratory care was consistent with professional standards of practice when there was no physician order to administer oxygen for one of two sampled residents (Resident 152). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unsafe use of oxygen equipment, respiratory infection, unable to breathe comfortably, and/or hospitalization for Resident 152. Findings: A review of Resident 152's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 152 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 152's diagnoses included urinary tract infection ([UTI], common infections that happen when bacteria, often from the skin or rectum, enter the urethra, and infect the urinary tract), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD], lung disease that causes blocked airflow from the lungs), and heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a competency assessment skill (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics in performing that an individual need to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) checks performed upon hire and annually for two out of five randomly selected staff. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility not be able to assess the skills necessary to provide nursing services to assure resident safety and to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident will not be performed within the acceptable standards of practice. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/27/2024 at 10:55 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), five random employees file were checked. The DSD stated Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not have yearly competency assessment skills check on file. The DSD stated Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) did not have a competency assessment skills check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the order for a psychotropic medication (drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) as needed (PRN), was not limited to 14 days per regulation for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 43). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the use of unnecessary medication, or non-therapeutic use of psychotropic mediation. Findings: A review of Resident 43's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 43 on 1/21/2024. Resident 43's diagnoses included end stage heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs. End stage is a high risk of dying in the next 6 to 12 months), Acute kidney failure (sudden loss of the ability of the kidneys to function), and anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities). A review of Resident 43's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/26/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 43 could make needs known but could not make medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Label and remove one opened expired ipratropium with albuterol (a combination medication used to treat and prevent shortness of breath) inhalation solution for Resident 40. 2. Remove expired opened ipratropium (atrovent inhaler) with albuterol solution for Resident 45. These deficient practice had the potential to result in prolonged use and loss of strength of the expired inhalation solution and can lead to ineffective treatment of respiratory symptoms and possibly can cause severe adverse reactions (an unintended effect of a medication that is harmful or unpleasant) including hospitalizations. Findings: A review of Resident 40's admission Record, indicated, Resident 40 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] . Resident 40's diagnosis included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own) and congestive heart failure ([CHF] a serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document insulin injection location sites of administration for one out of seven residents (Resident 101). This deficient practice had the potential to result in skin and tissue damage if injection sites were not rotated. Findings: A review of Resident 101's admission record indicated Resident 101 was originally admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), thrombocytopenia (a low number of platelets in the blood), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs) and bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). A review of Resident 101's Minimum Data Set (Minimum Data (MDS- an assessment and care screening tool), dated 2/24/2024, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the California Department of Public Health (the Department) within two hours for one out of three sample residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for a delay in the Department ' s investigation of the abuse allegation and placed Resident 1 at risk for further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain), muscle weakness and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (a mental illness that affects thoughts and mood behavior, may present with hallucinations or delusions). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized care assessment and care screening tool), dated 11/22/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the staff failed to implement and/or maintain infection control measures for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when: Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) touched a clean linen cart with soiled gloves. CNA 2 exited Resident 2's room wearing soiled personal protective equipment (PPE, specialized clothing or equipment, including gowns and gloves, worn by an employee for protection against infectious materials). CNA 3 assisted Resident 2 with morning care (care provided in the morning that includes, but is not limited to, bathing, dressing, and linen changes) without donning (putting on) the required PPE. CNA 3 exited Resident 2's room without performing hand hygiene (cleaning one's hands to substantially reduce potential pathogens [harmful microorganisms] on the hands). These deficient practices had the potential to transmit disease-causing pathogens to vulnerable facility residents. Findings: During an observation on 5/16/2023 at 8:52 AM, directly outside of Resident 2's room, signage at the room entrance indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet ([sq. ft.] unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 11 out of 23 resident rooms. The insufficient space had the potential to result in and lead to inadequate nursing care to the residents. Findings: During a facility tour on 4/17/2025 at 3:15 p.m., it was observed that residents in Rooms 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, and 16 were able to move in and out of their rooms, and there was space for the beds, side tables, and resident care equipment. During an interview on 4/17/2025 at 3:35 p.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS confirmed they had resident rooms with less than the required 80 sq. ft. per resident. The facility's letter requesting a Room Size Waiver, dated 4/17/2025, submitted by the Administrator (ADM), for 11 resident rooms was reviewed. The waiver request letter indicated there were no problems with resident safety nor was there a problem with physical accommodation of needs, including handicapped equipment accessibility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the required 80 square feet (sq ft) for each resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 11 of 23 resident's rooms. The resident rooms included rooms 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14 and 16 which did not meet the regulation, placing the residents at risk for lack of privacy, safety concerns during care, and emergency services. Findings: A record review of a room waiver letter, dated 4/27/2024, indicated the Administrator (ADM) had requested a room waiver for the residents' room sizes less than 80 sq ft per resident for 11 of 23 rooms. The following resident rooms measured as followed: room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft room [ROOM NUMBER]- 224.40 sq ft During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CHARIS TRUST DTD 12/22/16 — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 5.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID, EMMANUEL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/1999 |
| DAVID, OFELIA | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/22/2016 |
| WASHINGTON ENTERPRISES III LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/21/1986 |
| STEVE, DENISE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| HADADZ, ALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/04/2026 |
| VILLALUZ, CHRISTIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/16/2024 |
| VILLALUZ, RAMONA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $534K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555218. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.