Marquis Care At Shasta
3550 Churn Creek Rd., Redding, CA 96002 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (530) 222-3630 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.5% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 562 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 277 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.9%CMS range 57.6–65.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.3%CMS range 6.5–10.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 6.5–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 125.0 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.79 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not protect one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) from physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C was seen putting their hands on Resident 2's shoulders, firmly shaking Resident 2, and telling Resident 2 loudly to stop. This had the potential to result in physical harm, pain, and mental anguish.Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated 12/1/20, indicated, residents had the right to be free from abuse by anyone, including facility staff. A review of the Employee Safety Rules and Responsibilities, dated 3/1/26, indicated, facility staff were expected to always conduct themselves in a professional manner. A review of Resident 2's admission Record, dated 12/7/23, indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of delusional disorder (a mental health condition where a person had an unshakable, false belief that was not based in reality), dementia (a disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to report two allegations of physical abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, protected the public's health), the local police department, or the Ombudsman's office (an agency that protected resident rights) for two out of five sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when: 1.Resident 1 told the Resident Care Manager (RCM) that they sustained a fracture (broken bone) in the left ulna (lower arm) that resulted from rough care that was provided by two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). 2. CNA B indicated they had witnessed CNA C physically abuse Resident 2. These failures had the potential for abuse allegations to go unrecognized and placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Reporting Abuse to Facility Management, revised 10/1/22, indicated, allegations or suspicions of abuse were to be reported immediately to the facility's Administrator (Admin). The P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 reported that facility staff provided rough care that caused an injury. This failure placed residents that lived in the facility at risk for further potential abuse. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Investigations, revised 10/15/20, indicated that when an allegation of abuse was reported, the facility was required to thoroughly investigate it. The P&P indicated that the investigation included interviewing any possible witnesses, such as staff, the resident's roommate, and other residents cared for by the accused staff member. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 7/13/12, indicated admission to the facility on 7/13/12 and had been diagnosed on [DATE] with age related osteoporosis (a condition that caused weak bones and increased the risk of broken bones from minor bumps or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure federal regulations related to the education qualification requirements of the dietarymanager were followed as outlined in the California Code, Health and Safety Code (HSC1265.4). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate oversight of the food and nutrition services department associated with meal distribution accuracy, safe food handling and sanitation guidelines.Cross references to F812 examples #1, #2, #3 and #4 . Findings:On 03/02/2026 at 11:07 PM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated he was responsible for managing the kitchen. DM stated that the Certified Dietary Manager credential expired 8/31/22. On 03/03/2026 at 12:50 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN). The RDN stated that her responsibilities included nutrition assessments, nutrition interventions, monitoring of weights, participation in weight committee meeting, monitoring of pressure injuries, and monthly kitchen audits and tray line observations. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when:1.The regular zucchini recipe was not followed.2.The puree zucchini recipe was not followed.3.The BBQ chicken recipe for regular diets was not followed.4.The puree BBQ chicken recipe was not followed.These failures had the potential to not meet the residents' nutritional needs for the 8 (Residents 8, 9, 35, 128, 22, 72, 91, 119) of 124 residents who received a pureed diet and 82 of 124 who received a regular diet. Findings:1. On 3/3/26 at 10:30 AM, a concurrent kitchen observation and interview was conducted during preparation of lunch meal with [NAME] 1 (CK 1). Steamed zucchini was in a hotel pan on the counter. It appeared without seasoning. CK 1 stated he does not add seasoning. CK 1 stated he did not refer to a recipe during the cooking process.A review of the facility policy titled, Cooking Food, revised April 2019, showed that Recipes will be followed for the menu items.A review of the facility document titled, Roasted Zucchini Method, dated 2002-2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation requirements were followed when:1. The kitchen environment was not cleaned adequately around stoves, ranges, and some refrigerators.2. Kitchen utensils and equipment were stored wet.3. Plastic cutting boards were found to be excessively scored & cut.4. Dry storage floors were found to be dirty. These failures posed the risk of foodborne illnesses in a highly susceptible resident population of 124 facility residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings:1.During an observation of the kitchen on 3/2/26 at 11:07 am, grease and grime were observed on multiple surfaces of the main cooking area. Dark brown grease, food particles, and grime were observed on the sides and doors of stoves, on top of the cooking range, and on sidewalls and surfaces of hot oil fryer. During an interview with Dietary Manager (DM) on 3/4/26 at 10:03 am, DM stated, I clean the [oil] fryer every Friday. The cooks are supposed to clean the stoves, ovens, and ranges.On 3/4/26 at 11:50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0627 — patternEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate discharges for two of five sampled residents when the facility transferred (when a resident goes to the hospital for an evaluation and is expected to return to the facility), the residents the hospital then refused to allow them to return to the facility and discharged (formal and final release of the resident without intention of them returning) them. Resident 3 and 137's medical records contained no documented reasons by their physicians for not allowing them to return to the facility, the residents were not prepared or notified in advance that they were being discharged from the facility, and the residents and their family members (FM) were not provided with a notice that they had the right to appeal the facility's decision to discharge them.This failure had the potential to cause unnecessary prolonged hospitalizations with increased health care issues and compounded mental health, emotional distress and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable, appetizing, or at an appealing temperature for eleven of 124 Residents' (Resident 7, 13, 53, 68, 82, 131, as well as five confidentially interviewed residents) whose meals were cold and or unappetizing.These failures had the potential for decreased meal intake which could result in weight loss, decreased nutritive value and negatively impact the residents' quality of life. (Cross references to F803)Findings During an interview on 3/2/28 at 1:54 pm, Resident 53 stated, Food is horrible. Once in a while it is ok.Once in a while they have a good food. I do not like the watered-down milk. I didn't know I could ask for something else. During an interview on 3/2/26 2:00 pm, Resident 82 stated, Food not good. Does not taste good. Chicken is tough, not good. During an interview on 3/3/26 at 7:40 am, Resident 131 stated [Breakfast] was warm when it arrived, but not hot. I don't like the egg whites, it was cold.Food is cold a lot.They serve a lot of pasta, which is cold often, and cold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure glucose testing (blood sugar level check for diabetics) was performed in accordance with the facility's infection control policies and procedures for three of three sampled residents when hand hygiene was not performed before and after wearing gloves and alcohol wipes used to sanitize residents fingers was not allowed to air dry. (Residents 14, 94, and130) This failure put the residents at risk for infections and negatively impact their physical well-being by exposing them to germs.Findings: A review of facility's policy titled, Standard Precautions revised 5/2010 indicated, Standard precautions include the following practices: Change gloves as necessary, during the care of a resident to prevent cross-contamination from one body site to another (when moving from a dirty site to a clean one). Remove gloves promptly after use, before touching non-contaminated items and environmental surfaces, and before going to another resident and wash hand immediately to avoid transfer of microorganisms to other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure two out of two sampled residents (Residents 11 and 130) were free from chemical restraints (behavioral management medication that could cause excessive sleepiness) when:The facility failed to appropriately monitor the specific symptoms for which psychoactive medications (altered the brain) were prescribed to Resident 11; andThe facility failed to appropriately monitor the specific symptoms for which psychoactive medications were prescribed to Resident 130.This failure caused the inability to know if the medication was working for its intended use. Findings:1.A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Psychoactive Medication Management and Chemical Restraint Prevention, dated 4/25/25, indicated, residents would be monitored when the physician prescribed psychoactive medications.A review of Resident 11's admission Record, dated, 8/4/24, indicated admission to the facility on 8/4/24 with the diagnoses of bipolar disorder, current mixed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise a comprehensive care plan for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 81 and Resident 131) when: 1.Resident 81 did not have activity interventions for specific needs and preferences. 2.Resident 131 did not have specific nursing interventions for shaving himself and getting out of bed. These failures had the potential to result in the residents' needs not being identified, feeling depressed with poor self-esteem, and had the potential to contribute to skin breakdown, infection, and negatively impact their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of experts from different fields working together to provide comprehensive care), revised 11/2017, the P&P indicated, Care planning begins the day of admission for all residents. The care plan is recognized as an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a telephone order (when the doctor calls the nurse to give an order for a resident) for a medication was correctly transcribed for one of eleven sampled residents when an order to give a medication in the eye was mistakenly written to be given in the ear. (Resident 58)This error has the potential for residents to receive medication via the incorrect route. Not receiving the medication via the correct route, the medication would be ineffective to treat what it was prescribed for.Findings A record review of facility policy titled, Physicians Medication Orders revised 1/16 indicated on line 6, Orders for medication must include d. Route of administration if other than oral. Line 11 stated, Physicians orders are reviewed and sent to the primary care provider monthly for ongoing order reviewing.A record review of facility policy and procedures titled, Identifying and Managing Medication Errors and Adverse Consequences revised 4/15/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove expired medications from one of four treatment carts and were available for resident use.This had the potential for residents to receive expired medications which would not be effective or safe for use.Findings:A record review of facility policy titled, Storage of Medications revised 5/10, indicated under Policy Interpretation and Implementation Line 2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage AND preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner.A record review of facility pharmacy policy and procedures titled, Medication Storage in the Facility revised 1/1/23, indicated under Procedures, line J stated, Medication storage conditions are monitored on a periodic basis by the consultant pharmacist or consultant nurse and corrective action taken if problems are identified. Line G stated, All expired medications will be removed from the active supply and destroyed in the facility, regardless of amount remaining. The medication will be destroyed in the usual manner.An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure:1.One of three sampled resident's minced and moist (MM5) therapeutic diets (special needs diet plans), was prepared according to the recipe. (Resident 143)2. Nursing staff had a current and complete diet manual reference.These failures had the potential to result in residents receiving diets that do not match physicians' orders and incorrect preparation of special therapeutic diets and for nursing staff not to have reference material to recognize when a diet is served incorrectly. Findings:1.On 03/03/2026 at 10:30 AM, during a kitchen observation, [NAME] 1 (CK 1) was preparing minced and moist diet (MM5, foods are finely chopped and kept moist so they are easier to chew and swallow) minced (foods that have been cut or chopped into very small, fine pieces), chicken without referring to the recipe.On 03/03/2026 at 11:50 AM, during a kitchen observation during lunch trayline, a MM5 diet tray for Resident 143 included minced chicken with BBQ sauce on top.A review of the facility document titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1) was treated with respect and dignity during direct personal care when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I rushed Resident 1 and held his arms to prevent hitting staff when the bed linen was changed. This failure had the potential to result in emotional stress, embarrassment, feelings of neglect, and the potential for negative clinical outcomes.Findings: During a review of the facility's policy revised 8/2017, titled, Quality of Life-Dignity, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. Residents shall be treated with respect and dignity at all times. Treated with respect and dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. This facility's policy indicated staff shall treat cognitively impaired residents with dignity and sensitivity addressing the underlying motives or root causes for behavior and not challenging or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff responded in a timely manner to residents' requests for assistance for one of four sampled residents, (Resident 1), when call-lights were not answered for greater than 20 minutes multiple times. These failures had the potential to negatively impact residents' physical, emotional and psychosocial well-being and left Resident 4 feeling unfairly treated. Findings: During a review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights dated 5/2010, the policy indicated that 3. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity . Review of admission records for Resident 4 indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including depression, adult failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4), when Resident 4 had an unintentional significant weight loss of 5 percent (%) in one month. This failure had to potential for Resident 4 to have unwanted weight loss and negatively impact his physical well-being. Findings: Review of admission records for Resident 4 indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including depression, adult failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity), diabetes, insomnia, high blood pressure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue), muscle weakness. Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention dated 5/2018, indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff demonstrated appropriate competencies (knowledge, skills, and abilities that were required to provide safe and effective care to residents) when providing care for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when: 1. Licensed Nurses (LN) did not perform an assessment of Resident 1 ' s surgical site. 2. A Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) documented Resident 2 received a shower when Resident 2 did not receive a shower. 3. Residents 1, 2, and 3 experienced long call light wait times. 4. The competency checklist for registry staff (third party staff, employed by a registry agency and travels to different facilities to work) consisted of a self-evaluation and did not include oversight for evaluation of competencies or skills. These failures had the potential for an infection to go unnoticed and to negatively impact resident ' s physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. A review of the facility ' s policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the pureed food (food that is either ground, mashed or blended into a pudding like consistency), recipes were followed. This failure resulted in unappetizing food and had the potential for 11 residents who received pureed food, to receive diets that had not met their nutritional needs. Findings: A review of the facility Matrix (a record of residents and their needs), showed that 11 of 115 residents received pureed diets. A review of the facility's policy titled, Cooking Food dated 8/23/23, indicated, Recipes will be followed for the menu items. A review of the facility's recipe titled, P Seas Spinach no date, indicated that this recipe made 5 servings and called for 2.5 cups of seas spinach, and 3 tablespoons of thickener. The recipe provided instructions to reserve cooking liquid and add the liquid back to the spinach when pureeing it in the Robot Coupe (RC a device used to grind or puree food), and reheat to 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/8/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility food was appetizing and palatable when 14 of 115 residents (Residents 328, 329, 36, 576, 72, 26, 529, 86, 580, 119, 587 and three confidential residents), who received food prepared in the facility kitchen were not satisfied with the facility food. This failure had the potential for 14 residents to have decreased intake which could lead to unplanned weight loss and other medically related concerns. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 328's medical record indicated that Resident 328 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate causes poor blood flow), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that blocks airflow and make it difficult to breathe). A review of Resident 328's Minimum Data Set, (MDS, a standardized assessment tool), dated 10/2/24, indicated that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score in Section C, rated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure seven of 116 resident's (Resident 577, 61, 579, 580, 69, 587 and 114) food preferences were honored. This failure posed the potential for facility residents to not be satisfied with their meals which could contribute to decreased intake and further lead to unintentional weight loss. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Food Preferences updated May 12, 2021, showed nutritional assessments will include an evaluation of individual food preferences. 1. During a review of Resident 577's clinical record. Resident 577 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, numbness of feet and hands, irregular heart rate, and wounds to right foot and left foot. The most recent Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 09/27/24, indicated that Resident 577 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 10/07/24 at 12:28 pm, with Resident 577. Resident 577 stated, I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: 1. The cool down process for time, temperature control, and safety of food (TSC, foods that need to be kept at specific temperatures to prevent bacteria growth and foodborne illness), was not monitored. 2. Dish machine wash and rinse temperatures did not meet manufacturer's guidelines. 3. Hair restraints were not worn. 4. Food preparation equipment was not in proper working order. 5. Kitchen equipment was not clean. 6. Food preparation equipment and silverware were not air dried. 7. Food was not stored properly in the kitchen. 8. Kitchen cleaning supplies were not stored properly. 9. Non-functioning kitchen equipment was not discarded. These failures had the potential of causing foodborne illness in 115 of 116 residents who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings: A review of the facility Matrix (a list of residents and thieir care needs), showed that 115 of 116 residents consumed food prepared in the kitchen. 1. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four out of 25 sampled residents' (Resident 19, 36, 112, and Resident 121) care plans were develped, reviewed and revised when: 1. Significant unplanned weight loss for Resident 19 was not updated on the care plan. 2. Unplanned weight loss and a room change for Resident 36 was not updated on the care plan. 3. End of life care for Resident 112 was not updated on the care plan. 4. A Urinary Tract Infection (UTI, a bladder infection), for Resident 121 was not updated on the care plan. These failures had the potential to result in the residents' needs not being identified, and resident's feeling depressed with poor self-esteem, and had the potential to contribute to skin breakdown, infection, and negatively impact their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy revised 11/2017 titled, Care Plans-Person Centered Comprehensive, indicated an individualized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs, basic needs as personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, transferring, walking, and eating), were provided for three of eight sampled dependent residents (residents who depend on staff to help them), (Resident's 2, 29 and 112), when: 1. Routine grooming activities were not completed for Resident 2 and Resident 29. 2. Routine and scheduled showers were not completed for Resident 112. These failures had the potential to result in the residents feeling depressed with poor self-esteem, and had the potential to contribute to skin breakdown, infection, and negatively impact their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's policy revised 8/2017 titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails-Level II, indicated this purpose of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infection. Nail care includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident when expired medications and an expired Emergency Drug Kit (E-Kit, medications that are readily available for use when the Pharmacy is closed), were available for use in the [NAME] Unit medication room. This had the potential for the residents to receive expired medications that are no longer considered viable, safe or effective for treating their illnesses. Findings: During an observation of the [NAME] Unit medication room conducted on 10/09/24 at 1:13 pm, the following expired medications were found to be available for resident use; Two bottles of unopened Acetaminophen (pain reliever and fever reducer), 500 milligram tablet (mg, a unit of measure), expired 09/2024. Soothing 12 Hour Nasal Decongestant (relieves nasal congestion) Spray, 30 milliliter (ml, a unit of measure), expired 09/2024. An E-Kit that expired 09/2024, and contained the following; Cefazolin (antibiotic), 1 gram (gm, a unit of measure), 4 vials Cefepime (antibiotic),1 gm, 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent (5%). During the medication pass on 10/08/24 and 10/09/24, four medication errors were observed out of twenty-seven opportunities for four of six residents (Residents 17, 328, 103), which resulted in an overall medication error rate of 14.81%, when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 4 administered an iron supplement to Resident 17 with milk. This failure had the potential to reduce absorption of the iron supplement. 2. LN 6 did not follow the manufacturer's instruction for administration of the Breo Ellipta Inhaler (a medical device for administering a respiratory medication, which is to be inhaled). This failure had the potential for Resident 328 to not receive the full dose of the medication and could possibly cause contamination of the inhaler and its contents. 3. LN 7 did not follow the manufacturer's instruction for administration the Breo Ellipta Inhaler. The omissions in instruction could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from pests. This failure posed the risk of 116 residents who resided in the facility to be exposed to pests. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Vermin Control dated 4/2018, showed the Food and Nutrition Services Department must be free from vermin (pests), at all times. The Food and Nutrition Services Department must be kept free of soil and clutter. Arrangements will be made by the Administrator for an effective pest control program to provide routine service. Review of the facility documents from the outside pest company dated 7/18/24, 8/13/24 and 9/19/24 showed that two fly bait stations located in the kitchen and one fly bait station located outside the facility were serviced. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 10/7/24 at 10:40 am, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), one fly was observed in the kitchen near the food preparation sink. On 10/7/24 at 11:49 an, an observation of the kitchen was conducted. The air curtain, a device used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one of eight sampled residents (Resident 36) when she was left in a soiled brief, and not changed in a timely manner. This failure resulted in Resident 36 to feel increased anxiety, and depression and had the potential to result in emotional stress, embarrassment, feelings of neglect, and the potential for negative clinical outcomes. Findings: The facility's policy revised 8/2017 titled, Quality of Life-Dignity, indicated each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times, to include promptly responding to the resident's request for toileting assistance. The facility's policy revised 5/2010 titled, Resident Rights, indicated employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. This facility's policy indicated the facility will make every effort to assure each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of eight sampled residents' bedroom (Resident 29) was maintained in a comfortable and homelike setting, when Resident 29 could not see his wife's pictures due to clutter on his dresser. This failure resulted in Resident 29 becoming frustrated and violated the right to have a home like environment. Findings: A review of the facility's policy dated 5/2011 titled, Quality of Life-Homelike Environment, indicated residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. This policy also indicated the facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include cleanliness and order, personalized furniture, and room arrangements. A review of Resident 29's clinical record indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and Policy and Procedure (P&P) review, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 19), received acceptable nutritional services when: 1. Resident 19's nutritional status was not assessed by the Registered Dietitian (RD) upon admission. 2. Resident 19's significant unplanned weight loss was not assessed by the RD and the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, facility managers who discuss resident concerns and develop plans to correct them). 3. Resident 19's admission weight was not obtained in a timely manner upon readmission, in accordance with the facility policy. As a result of these failures, Resident 19's compromised nutritional status was not addressed timely, which could lead to further medical complications. Findings: 1. A review of the facility policy titled, Nutritional Assessment revised 5/2028, showed, that a nutrition assessment, including current nutritional status and risk factors for impaired nutrition, shall be conducted for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure federal regulations related to the education qualification requirements of the dietary manager were followed as outlined in the California Code, Health and Safety Code (HSC 1265.4). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate oversight of the food and nutrition services department associated with meal distribution accuracy, safe food handling and sanitation guidelines. Findings: According to the HSC 1265.4, (4) Is a graduate of a dietetic services training program approved by the Dietary Managers Association and is a certified dietary manager credentialed by the Certifying Board of the Dietary Managers Association, maintains this certification, and has received at least six hours of in-service training on the specific California dietary service requirements contained in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations prior to assuming full-time duties as a dietetic services supervisor at the health facility. On 10/7/24 at 10:31 AM, an interview was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The CDM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 116 resident's (Resident 48) received the appropriate textured diet when chopped meats were not the appropriate size. This failure had the potential for residents who received chopped meats to not receive the appropriate texture which could lead to chewing and/or swallowing concerns. Findings: Review of the facility document titled, Therapeutic Spreadsheet Week 2 Monday dated 10/7/24, showed Easy to Chew diets should have received chopped meat for the lunch meal. Review of the facility Diet Manual, revised September 2024, showed, Mechanical Soft diet Recommendations: All meat (such as beef, fish, poultry and pork), should be ground or chopped. Definition of Menu Terms: Chopped was defined as ¼ inch to ½ inch pieces. A review of Resident 48's clinical record showed Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of left humerus (upper arm), unspecified dementia, and major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage properly. These failures had the potential to result in attracting insects and rodents affecting all 116 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 5-501.19 Storage Areas, Redeeming Machines, Receptacles and Waste Handling Units, Location. (A) An area designated for refuse, recyclables, returnables, and, except as specified in (B) of this section, a redeeming machine for recyclables or returnables shall be located so that it is separate from food, equipment, utensils, linens, and single-service and single-use articles and a public health hazard or nuisance is not created. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 5-501.110 Storing Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnables. refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be stored in receptacles or waste handling units so that they are inaccessible to insects and rodents. A review of the facility's policy titled, Food/Waste Disposal, dated 8/2/24 indicated, The Food and Nutrition Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they coordinated resident care needs with the Hospice Agency (an outside agency that specializes in end of life care), for one of four sampled residents (Resident 112). This failure caused a delay in personal care, comfort, and had the potential to result in emotional stress, feelings of neglect, and negative clinical outcomes for residents who received Hospice services. Findings: A review of the facility's policy dated 5/2010 titled, Hospice Program, indicated the facility contracts for hospice services for residents who wish to participate in such programs. A Coordinated Plan of Care between the facility, hospice agency, and resident/family will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. The care plan shall be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current status. A review of Resident 112's clinical record indicated Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three residents sampled for abuse (Resident 1), from physical abuse received by staff, when a registry staff aggressively grabbed the resident ' s wrists while providing care. This failure had the potential to result in long term ill effects on the residents physical and mental health resulting in the resident ' s lack of trust towards staff for all care and negative emotional interactions. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral infarct (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body following a disruption of blood supply and restricted oxygen to the brain resulting in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain), Vascular dementia (brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain causing problems with reasoning judgment, and thought process), and Kidney Cancer. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from verbal abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 cursed at her while providing care. This had the potential to cause a decline in Resident 1's psychosocial well being. Findings: A review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, dated 12/2020, included the following policy statement, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. A review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 5/2010, included the following policy statement, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. A review of Resident 1's record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), anxiety, and dementia. The California Department of Public Health received a report from the facility of possible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled Hospice (end of life care) residents (Residents 1 and 2), were free from unnecessary medications when: 1. Resident 1 was ordered morphine sulfate (an opioid narcotic), without adequate indications of what level of pain (mild, moderate or severe), this medication was expected to treat. 2. Resident 2 was ordered Dilaudid (an opioid narcotic), without adequate indications of what level of pain the medication was expected to treat. This failure had the potential for Licensed Nursing (LN) to administer too much pain medication which could lead to over sedation and negative clinical outcomes, or give too little and subject the residents to uncontrolled pain, which could have a negative psychosocial and emotional impact on the quality of end of life care that Residents 1 and 2 received. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Orders , revised 5/1/10, indicated, When recording PRN pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with professional food safety standards when: 1. Kitchen staff did not follow professional standards of practice to minimize cross contamination. 2. Two out of three observed nursing unit pantries contained expired resident food. 3. Kitchen equipment was not maintained in a sanitary manner These practices had the potential to result in foodborne illness for residents consuming food in the facility, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: During observations, beginning 1/9/23 at 9:08 am, through four out of four days of the survey, Nutritional Services staff personal items were observed in the kitchen. This included a used N 95 mask on the dish machine, a used face shield on top of the coffee maker, two phone charger cords and a container of energy drink mix in the cook's area, a can of personal energy drink on the shelf in the walk-in refrigerator, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident grievances and complaints were promptly reviewed, investigated, resolved, and documented for five confidential residents. This failure resulted in the loss of personal property, and the potential for psychosocial issues and concerns related to the resident's loss of personal property. Findings: The facility's policy, revised 11/16, titled, Concerns and Grievances, was reviewed, and indicated that any resident, or representative may voice or file a grievance, or complaint regarding theft, or loss of property without reprisal in any form. The filing of a grievance can be done anonymously. This policy also indicated upon receipt of a grievance or complaint, the facility will investigate the allegations and resolve the grievance promptly. The grievance official in the facility shall be the Social Services Director (SSD), or as designated by the facility. The grievance officer will maintain a log of concerns and grievance reports to be used in Quality Assurance, (QAPI) monitoring of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the individual care needs for one out of sample resident (Resident 24), three of five confidentially interviewed residents, and eight of 25 sampled residents (Residents 32, 41, 53, 56, 68, 70, 93, and 409), when these residents complained of long wait times (up to 30 minutes) for their calls for staff assistance to be answered. The facility's failure to ensure sufficient staff to answer resident calls for assistance promptly contributed to residents' frustration and had the potential to cause emotional and physical harm to residents who did not receive the care when needed. Findings: 1. During an interview, on 1/09/23 at 3:45 pm, Resident 24 said they are short staffed especially on the night shift when sometimes there are only two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on the whole side. Resident 24 said that she is incontinent so sometimes it takes a while to get cleaned up. Resident 24 was alert and oriented. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and store medications and biologicals when: 1. Glucometer (a small portable device used for blood sugar testing) calibration control solution had expired on the Transitional Care Unit (TCU)-B medication cart which affected two residents (Residents 97, and 410). 2. Blood specimen collection tubes had expired in the [NAME] Hall Medication Room. 3. Loose wasted pills and a used bupenorphine (narcotic medication) patch were in a large, unlocked bin in the TCU Medication Room. 4. Two signed prescriptions for a controlled substance written on a physician prescription pad for two residents (Residents 31, and 36) were loose in the [NAME] Hall Medication Room. This failure had the potential to cause Residents 97, and 410, to receive care and treatment based on inaccurate blood glucose level results; to cause residents who had blood work done to receive care and treatment based on inaccurate lab values; to risk exposure of residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-12 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the qualifications, competencies, and skill sets of the Registered Dietitian (RD), and the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) were in place and supported to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when: 1. There was inadequate oversight and mentoring provided by the RD to the DSS to make sure an effective system was in place to ensure food was prepared in a safe and sanitary environment. 2. The RD and Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) had ineffective oversight, training, and competence of staff. 3. Nutrition assessment, monitoring, and response to resident weight loss were not performed timely. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness, compromised nutritional status, ineffective resident care interventions, and decreased quality of life impacting all residents in the facility which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: A review of an undated facility's job description…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were competent to carry out the responsibilities of the Food and Nutrition Services when: 1. Staff were unable to determine food use-by dates. 2. The Dish Room staff were unclear regarding dish machine water temperature requirements in a machine that used hot water to sanitize dishes. 3. Staff did not state or follow manufacturer's instructions when testing quaternary ammonia sanitizer concentration. 4. Staff did not label or store chemicals per policy, and two staff interviewed were unclear regarding the correct number of tablets to use for the disinfectant they mixed. 5. Staff did not follow professional standards of practice These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness, decreased nutritional status, decreased meal satisfaction, and medical decline for residents consuming food prepared in the kitchen and food areas. [ Findings: A review of an undated facility's job description titled, Cook, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all resident meals were palatable when 5 of the 25 sampled residents (Resident 32, 41, 70, 81, and 93) complained that their meals were consistently served too cold. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and nutrition of all residents and may have contributed to ongoing and significant weight loss for the residents leading to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: During interviews, conducted during initial tour, on 1/9/23 at 10 am, five sampled residents (Resident 32, 41, 70, 81, and 93) all stated that the meals they are served at the facility are consistently too cold, making the food unpalatable. 1. Resident 32's medical record was reviewed. Resident 32 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive (syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, often accompanied by dehydration and impaired immune function), type 2 diabetes, and age-related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 41), when the resident experienced a series of falls. This lack of revision had the potential for interventions to be inconsistently utilized placing Resident 41 at risk of further falls that could result in injury, or further negative clinical outcomes. Findings: Resident 41's medical record was reviewed. Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Adult Failure to Thrive (syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, accompanied by dehydration, and impaired immune function) Cerebral infarction with monoplegia of lower limb (a stroke which effected the ability to use and move one leg), and a history of falls. Resident 41's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set, a resident assessment tool) dated 10/27/22, indicated that Resident 41 required the extensive assistance of two staff for her to change position while in bed, or when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, medication administration did not meet professional standards of quality, when laxatives (treats constipation) were not given according to the physician orders, for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 77). This had the potential to result in severe constipation or intestinal blockage, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: Resident 77's medical record was reviewed. Resident 77 was admitted with diagnoses that included cognitive decline, diabetes, depression, and chorea (abnormal involuntary movement disorder). A review of physician's orders included to give Senna if there was no bowel movement after two days, give Milk of Magnesia (MOM) if there was no bowel movement after three days, then give a Bisacodyl suppository (inserted in rectum) if MOM was ineffective, then a Fleets enema rectally if suppository was ineffective. A review of the bowel movements records indicated, that Resident 77 had no bowel movements from 12/30/22, until 1/6/23 (seven days). She was given Senna on 1/2/23, but did not have a bowel movement. MOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming and hygiene when one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 18) had long, dirty fingernails. This failure had the potential to cause skin scratches that could have become infected which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails - Level II, revised 8/1/17, was reviewed, and indicated that staff are to clean the nail beds, to keep the nails trimmed, and to prevent infection. Diabetic nail care was to be completed by a Licensed Nurse. Nail care included daily cleaning and regular trimming. Trimmed and smooth nails prevented the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring their skin. The policy indicated that the steps in the procedure for nail care included gently removing the dirt from around each nail with an orange stick, and smoothing the nails with a file or emery board. Resident 18's medical record was reviewed. Resident 18 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 41) maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. This failure had the potential for the lack of nutritional goals to be maintained which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: Resident 41's medical record was reviewed. Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Adult Failure to Thrive (syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, often accompanied by dehydration, and impaired immune function), cerebral infarction with monoplegia of lower limb (a stroke which effected the ability to use and move one leg), and a history of falls. Resident 41's physician's orders, dated 1/11/23, indicated, Regular diet, mechanical soft, easy to chew texture, NEM (Nutritionally Enhanced Meal - indicated that staff was to add extra butter and gravy to meals). A physician's order, dated 5/10/22, indicated, House Supplement three times a day, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility's pharmacy consultant failed to identify drug irregularities which included Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) requirement to limit as needed (PRN) psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications to 14 days, unless there was a documented rationale which included why the medication needed to be extended past 14 days, and the duration, for one of five sampled resident records reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 65). This resulted in, or had the potential to result in residents receiving unnecessary medication with adverse side effects, some of which could include permanent neurological side effects, and a deterioration in the clinical condition of residents. Findings: Resident 65's medical record was reviewed. Resident 65 was admitted with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, delusional disorder (characterized by the presence of one or more delusions that persist for at least one month), and anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make sure that one resident (Resident 46) was free of significant medication errors when they received less than the prescribed dose of aspirin (an anti-platelet agent given to prevent blood clots). This failure had the potential to threaten Resident 46's health and well-being, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: Resident 46's medical record was reviewed. Resident 46's was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer), high blood pressure, and cerebral infarction (a stroke). A review of Resident 46's physician's orders, dated 1/11/23, indicated an order for Aspirin 325 mg (milligrams), one tablet by mouth, one time a day, related to cerebral infarction. The order had been written on 10/31/17. During a medication administration observation, on 1/11/23, at 9:50 am, Licensed Nurse (LN) D administered one Aspirin 81 mg enteric coated from a stock supply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident preferences were honored for two of 25 sampled residents (Residents 9, and 70). This failure not to provide food in accordance with resident preferences could result in decreased meal satisfaction and overall caloric intake which could lead to undesired weight loss. Findings: 1. During an interview, on 1/09/23 at 11 am, Resident 9 said she gets to pick her food preferences from a select menu, when staff bring it in, which is not every day. She said even when she does select her food from the menu, she still often does not get what she asks for, and she hasn't been eating as much as a result. She showed surveyor the white menu and it was blank for breakfast, although she said she had completed it. She said the residents get a pink menu and they circle their selection or write it on the menu, then the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) write the resident choices on a white menu that goes to the kitchen, but that does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the physician ordered diet for one of six sampled residents, (Resident 56) when the Consistent-Carbohydrate Diet (CC), diet for diabetics to control blood sugar management) was not followed. This failure resulted in high blood sugars and did cause Resident 56 increased anxiety, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: The facility's policy, revised 5/21, titled, Therapeutic Diets, indicated that diets modified for medical needs will be considered therapeutic diets. A therapeutic diet must be prescribed by the resident's attending physician and the terminology used by food services. The regular diet will be modified by the Registered Dietician (RD), for therapeutic diets, with input from the Dietary Manager (DM), for feasibility of kitchen production. The DM will establish and use tray identification system to ensure each resident receives his or her diet as ordered. Residents on therapeutic diets will not receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARQUIS COMPANIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 4.3 | -2.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2005 |
| FOGG, PHILLIP | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/25/1991 |
| FOGG, STEVEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/15/2001 |
| FOGG, ZACHARY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| STONE, JANET | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/17/2018 |
| TONE, STACI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/21/1994 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $891K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056222. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.