No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Marquis Springfield

1333 N. First Street, Springfield, OR 97477 · For profit - Corporation · 136 certified beds · (541) 736-2700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (541) 736-2700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Dec 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1460 G St · (541) 726-4444 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1210 Mohawk Blvd · (541) 747-3841 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1460 Mohawk Blvd · (541) 747-4177 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(541) 225-6300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.8%14.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.4%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.6%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.0%12.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.0%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.9%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.9%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.6%81.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%21.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.5%16.1%12.0%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 228 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.1%CMS range 47.4–58.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.5–12.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.5–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
29.7%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 136 beds and averages 76.2 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.52 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-05)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for not having a homelike environment. Findings include: 1. Resident 74 was admitted to facility in 2015 with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resident 74's Annual MDS Assessment completed in 10/2025 indicated a BIMS of 15 (cognitively intact).On [DATE] at 10:23 AM, several rooms on the north hall, including Resident 74's room, were observed to have linoleum floors that appeared stained and dirty. On [DATE] at 9:42 AM. Resident 74 stated the floor in his room looked pretty bad. She/he stated the facility needed to do a better job caring for the floor. 2. A walk-through of the facility conducted [DATE] at 10:00 AM revealed the following items: - Hallway carpets were excessively worn, stained or torn in 5 of 5 halls utilized by residents. There was a divot in the hallway outside rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] that created a tripping hazard.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide residents with a risk benefit assessment for 1 of 1 resident (# 74) assessed for food. This place residents at risk for uninformed choices. Findings include:Resident 74 was admitted to the facility in 2015 with diagnoses including diverticulitis. On 12/29/25 at 10:15 AM Resident 1 stated she/he was lactose intolerant kept getting food items containing dairy products with her/his meals. Resident 74 stated she/he takes Lactaid (a medication to treat lactose intolerance) before each meal however, she/he still will experience loose stools from the dairy products. An entry in the clinical record dated 2/15/23 revealed the resident was lactose intolerant. Physician orders dated 9/2024 for revealed an order for Lactaid. On 1/3/26 at 10:50 AM, Staff 11 (CNA) stated she often reminded Resident 74 her/his loose stools were related to eating foods containing dairy, but the resident continued to eat the foods she/he preferred. On 1/3/26 at 11:06 AM, Staff 12 (CNA) stated Resident 74 frequently experiences loose stools when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's skin injury was investigated for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#77) reviewed for non-pressure skin injury. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds. Findings include: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with a diagnosis of heart disease. An Abuse Investigations policy last revised on 10/15/20 revealed if an injury of unknown source was reported an investigation was to be completed. At a minimum staff were to review documents, medical records, interview staff who identified the incident, the resident and any staff who may have been in contact with the identified resident. Resident 77's 12/24/25 admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 77's 12/29/25 Progress Note revealed a CNA and nurse observed blood on Resident 77's bed sheets. Resident 77 was assessed to have hit her/his left great toe and Resident 1 reported she/he was not able to feel her/his feet and did not know what happened. On 12/29/25 at 11:27 AM Resident 77 stated her/his toe was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were given bed hold information for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 2 and 31) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of information and unexpected financial costs. Findings include: 1. The facility Bed Hold Policy with an unknown revision date indicated facility staff were to complete an Oregon Notice of Transfer or Discharge and Bed Hold form with each resident transfer and ensure the resident had the paperwork when they transferred out of the facility. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including an infection to the left leg and diabetes. An 10/12/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 2's medical record revealed she/he transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. No information was found in Resident 2's medical record to indicate a bed hold was explained, offered, or given to Resident 2 when she/he left the facility. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide meaningful activities designed to meet the interests of the resident for 1 of 1 resident (# 14) reviewed for mood. This placed residents at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings include:Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke). On 12/29/25 at 10:49 AM, Resident 14 stated she/he liked to read prior to his stroke. During observations 12/29/25 through 12/31/25 Resident 14 was observed in awake and in her/his bed without engaging in any activity. A review of Resident 14's clinical record revealed the following, In the past, I enjoyed reading a lot. Further review of the resident's Progress Notes revealed a nursing note dated 8/27/25 with the following, The stroke took my vision, and I am unable to read .I used to be an avid reader. A review of the resident's Activities Care Plan revealed the resident had no activities related to books. On 1/3/26 at 10:50 AM Staff 11 (CNA) stated Resident 14 spent most of his time in her/his bed or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and implement non-pressure injury interventions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#77) reviewed for edema. This placed residents at risk for fluid overload and worsening wounds. Findings include: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with a diagnosis of heart disease. a. Resident 77's 12/19/25 Orders Detail revealed staff were to obtain daily weights and notify her/his medical provider if she/he had more than a three-pound weight gain in 24 hours or a five-pound weight gain in one week. Resident 77's weight log revealed the following dates when she/he had more than a three-pound weight gain in 24 hours:-12/18/25 272 pounds-12/19/25 275.8 pounds-12/20/25 279.4 pounds Resident 77's clinical record did not have documentation to indicate her/his medical provider was notified of the three-pound weight gain on 12/19/25 and 12/20/25. On 1/2/26 at 1:44 PM Staff 5 (RNCM) verified Resident 77's medical provider was not notified on 12/19/25 or 12/20/25 per physician orders when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at a resident's bedside, residents were monitored after an aspiration event, and fall interventions were in place for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 5, 43 and 83) reviewed for accidents and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for accidental poisoning, aspiration, and at risk for injuries from falls. Findings include: 1.Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with diagnoses including weakness and scoliosis. On 12/29/25 at 10:39 AM, Resident 5 stated she/he rolled out of bed several times since admission in 11/2025. Resident 5 was observed lying in bed and fall mats were observed rolled up in the corner of the room. A 11/23/25 Progress Note revealed Resident 5 had fallen while trying to take her/himself to the bathroom and fall mats were placed as an intervention. A review of Resident 5's care plan revealed a 11/25/25 care plan for fall mats at bedside. Multiple observations made from 12/29/25 through 1/2/26 revealed Resident 5's fall mats were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observations, interviews, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain healthy nutrition status for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 12, 13, and 96) reviewed for pressure ulcers, tube feeding, and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for impaired nutrition. Findings include: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diaphragmatic hernia without obstruction (a condition in which an abdominal organ moves through an opening in the diaphragm into the chest area) and esophageal obstruction (functional impairment of swallowing due to a blockage in the esophagus). The 10/7/25 Hospital Discharge Summary orders indicated the facility dietitian was to manage Resident 12's tube feed. Staff were to administer Jevity 1.2 at a continuous rate of 30 (ml/hour), (advanced G-tube feeding formula) administered at 10 ml every 12 hours, advancing to a goal 55 ml/hour, for a total of 1,320 ml over 24 hours. On 10/7/25 Resident 12 weighed 117.2 pounds. The 10/7/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0743 — isolated
    Ensure that a resident does not develop patterns of decreased social interaction and/or increased withdrawn, angry, or depressive behaviors, unless unavoidable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents did not display increased anger, withdrawal or depressive behaviors for 1 of 1 resident (# 14) reviewed for mood. This placed residents at risk for unidentified depression. Findings include: Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke). Resident 14's MDS completed 9/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact) and a PQH9 score of 00 (not depressed).A 10/14/25 progress note revealed the resident was tearful and asked about options for therapy since she/he was discharged from physical therapy due to lack of progress and indicated the resident expressed frustration about not being able to go home. The resident had been described as pleasant and cooperative in previous notes. A progress note dated 10/15/25 revealed the resident declined her/his shower despite multiple attempts by staff to offer a shower. Resident 14's progress notes did not reveal any previous declinations of care. A progress note dated 10/19/25 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow medication parameters for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for side effects to medications. Findings include:Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with diagnoses including hypertension (elevated blood pressure).A review of Physician Orders revealed a 12/12/25 order for Aldactone 12.5 mg twice a day (a medication to help remove extra fluid from the body) for fluid retention hold for systolic blood pressure (top number) less then 115 or hold for diastolic blood pressure less than 70 (bottom number).A review of Resident 5's 12/2025 MAR revealed Aldactone was documented as given with a diastolic blood pressure less than 70:12/19/25 at 1:00 PM 124/6212/20/25 at 1:00 PM 122/6012/21/25 at 7:00 AM 128/6812/24/25 at 7:00 AM 128/6812/24/25 at 1:00 PM 132/6812/25/25 at 7:00 AM 130/6012/26/25 at 1:00 PM 128/6012/28/25 at 1:00 PM 128/6012/31/25 at 7:00 AM 126/6612/31/25 at 1:00 PM 124/66 A review of Resident 5's 1/2026 MAR revealed Aldactone was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an insulin open date was documented for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) observed to receive insulin during medication administration observation. This placed residents at risk for ineffective medication regimen. Findings include: Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 9/2025 with a diagnosis of diabetes. Resident 17's 12/31/25 Active Orders included staff were to administer Lispro (fast acting insulin) with meals. On 12/31/25 at 7:41 AM Staff 8 (LPN) was observed to prepare Insulin Lispro for Resident 17. The Lispro insulin did not have an open date, and Staff 8 stated all insulin was to be dated when first opened. On 12/31/25 at 8:41 AM Staff 9 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated insulin should be dated when opened. Staff stated the 12/2025 pharmacy receipt binder did not have a receipt for Resident 17's Lispro insulin and she was not able to determine when the Lispro was potentially first used. On 12/31/25 9:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the influenza vaccine was offered to residents for 1 of 5 (#13) sampled residents reviewed for vaccinations. This placed residents at risk for influenza infection. Findings include: The facility Vaccination of Residents policy with a 5/2021 revision date indicated all residents were to be offered vaccinations that helped in preventing disease and all vaccination information was to be recorded in the resident's medical record. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 11/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes and urinary tract infection. A 11/27/25 admission MDS indicated Resident 13 was cognitively intact.During a review of Resident 13's medical record no information was found to indicate the influenza (flu) vaccine was offered for the 2025 flu season (October 2025 through May 2026). On 1/5/26 at 1:50 PM, Staff 4 (DNS) stated the expectation for resident flu vaccinations was for all residents to be offered the flu vaccine each flu season. She acknowledged Resident 13 was not offered the influenza…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents had an accessible bathroom call light for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 38 and 83) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for the inability to call for assistance. Findings include: 1. Resident 38 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with a diagnosis of dementia. On 12/29/25 at 12:42 PM Resident 38's bathroom was observed without a call light cord to access if she/her fell to the ground. On 1/2/26 at 10:32 AM Staff 6 (Maintenance) stated if a resident room did not have a call light cord the staff were to notify him, and he would provide a cord. Staff 6 stated he was not notified Resident 38 did not have a bathroom call light cord. On 1/5/26 at 10:28 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she and Staff 4 (DNS) did audits to ensure residents' bathrooms had call light cords. Staff 1 stated the staff were to notify maintenance in person or via the facility online communication system if a resident needed a new call light cord. 2. Resident 83 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from misappropriation of property by staff for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#101, 102, 103 and 104) reviewed for misappropriation of property. Findings include: 1. Resident 101 was admitted to the facility in 2024, with diagnoses including cancer of the colon and frontal lobe of the brain. A Police Department Incident/Investigation Report dated 10/28/24, indicated the department received a report from the facility regarding possible theft of narcotic medication. On the night of 10/23/24 Staff 3 (Agency LPN) oversaw resident medications on the facility's South Hall and a resident complained to day shift staff she/he did not receive her/his narcotic pain medication and was in pain. Several other residents also complained about not getting their medications. Staff 2 (DNS) began an investigation and multiple medication administration and documentation discrepancies were found specifically with narcotic medications. All the concerns involved Staff 3. A progress note by Staff 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined the facility failed to report a reasonable suspicion of a crime to the State Survey Agency for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 101,102, 103 and 104) reviewed for misappropriation of property. This placed residents at risk for further misappropriation of property and incomplete investigations. Findings include: A Police Department Incident/Investigation Report dated 10/28/24 indicated they received a report from the facility regarding possible theft of narcotic medication. A Complaint Form dated 10/23/24 at 10:00 PM to 10/24/24 at 6:00 AM (the night shift) submitted by the facility to the Oregon State Board of Nursing indicated a possible diversion of medications had occurred. On the morning of 10/24/24 the medication aides reported several narcotics had been incorrectly signed out and medications were signed out of the narcotic book but not documented as administered on the eMAR (electronic MAR) by Staff 3 (LPN). There were discrepancies in Staff 3's charting of narcotics. Interviews with residents determined some residents had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#137) reviewed for dignity, 3 of 15 residents (#s 2, 15 and 39) reviewed for assisted dining. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include: 1. Random observations on 7/30/24 from 12:20 PM through 12:50 PM (30 minutes) revealed Staff 19 (CNA) was in the Willamette dining room and Residents 2, 15 and 39 were all seated at the same table for lunch. Staff 19 stood or walked around the table to assist each each of the residents with their lunch meal. On 7/30/24 at 1:13 PM Staff 19 stated the three residents in the Willamette dining room needed assistance and cueing when eating their meals. Staff 19 acknowledged she stood and should have been seated to assist Residents 2, 15 and 39 with their meals. On 8/1/24 at 4:30 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she expected all staff to sit with residents who required assistance with eating. Staff 2 stated Staff 19 spoke with her regarding the 7/30/24 dining incident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident dining environments were homelike, and resident shower rooms were clean for 1 of 2 dining rooms and 5 of 5 shower rooms reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of homelike environment and an unsanitary environment. Findings include: 1. Observations on 7/30/24 at 9:25 AM and 8/1/24 at 10:01 AM revealed five individual shower rooms for residents. All five shower rooms were observed to have a heater vent, a small heater unit on the wall, and a ceiling fan. All of them were covered in cobwebs and had dust particle build-up on the exterior and inside (approximately quarter-inch thick dust particles) for each of the three separate components (ceiling fan, heater vent and small heater). On 8/1/24 at 9:32 AM Staff 20 (Housekeeper) stated housekeepers were responsible for cleaning all five shower rooms, which included dusting the ceiling fans, vents and heaters. Staff 20 stated she was unable to clean the accumulated dust particles inside the heater, vent and ceiling fan and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to ensure a residents call light was within reach for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#25) reviewed for physical environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of ADL assistance. Findings include: Resident 25 was admitted to the facility in 11/2017 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident 25 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 7/29/24 at 1:07 PM Resident 25 stated she/he needed assistance to move her/himself in bed and was not sure where the call light was located. Observations on 7/29/24 from 1:08 PM through 3:09 PM revealed Resident 25's call light was on the left side of her/his bed, on the floor, out of reach. Staff entered Resident 25's room at 1:18 PM, repositioned her/him, and took the resident's lunch tray, but did not ensure her/his call light was within reach. On 7/29/24 at 3:09 PM Staff 16 (CNA) entered the room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide information related to financial responsibilities for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN). This placed residents at risk for unforeseen financial responsibilities. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 4/2024 and received Medicare services from 4/26/24 through 6/28/24. Resident 14 received and signed the NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) on 6/26/24. Although the resident remained in the facility, there was no evidence the resident received a SNFABN providing information on the resident's financial liability. On 7/31/24 at 4:16 PM Staff 5 (Social Service Director) acknowledged Resident 14 did not receive the SNFABN form and did not receive information about financial responsibilities after discharging from Medicare services while remaining in the facility.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident's needs related to nutrition for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 17 and 42) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and weight loss. Findings include: 1. Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. The 5/15/24 admission MDS Nutritional Status CAA did not include Resident 17's history, current nutritional status, or plan of care. On 8/1/24 at 1:15 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the 5/15/24 admission MDS Nutrition CAA was not comprehensive and did not include Resident 17's history, current nutritional status, or plan of care. 2. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including fracture of the right femur, malignant neoplasm of the lung and type 2 diabetes. Resident 42's admission MDS dated [DATE], Section V: Care Area Assessment (CAA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a mobility device for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#37) reviewed for positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for functional decline. Findings include: Resident 37 was admitted to the facility in 10/2021 with diagnoses including a stroke and dementia. The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident 37 had an upper extremity impairment and lower extremity impairment to one side of her/his body. A physician order dated 1/9/24 indicated Resident 37 was to have an InterDry (skin protector) cloth placed into her/his right hand daily. Random observations from 7/29/24 through 7/31/24 revealed Resident 37 was either up in her/his wheelchair or in bed with no skin protecting device in the right palm of her/his hand. On 7/31/24 at 2:20 PM Staff 12 (CNA) stated Resident 37 was alert but had confusion and limitations to her/his right arm and hand. Staff 12 stated an InterDry cloth was to be placed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to evaluate the potential risk of choking related to altered swallowing ability for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#430) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for choking. Findings include: Resident 430 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A 7/24/24 Speech Therapy Assessment completed while the resident was in the hospital identified medications crusted in either thin liquids or puree. The Evaluation indicated swallow deficits including a delayed swallow response, moderately impaired ability to swallow, and a mild deficit in protecting the airway during swallow. These swallowing deficits increased the risk of aspiration. admission orders dated 7/25/24 did not include information related to safe medication administration (or alternatively, did not indicated safe swallowing precautions related to medication administration). No evidence was found in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were in place including transportation, monitoring and communication with the dialysis provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at increased risk for complications associated with dialysis treatment. Findings include: Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. The 5/14/24 care plan indicated Resident 17 was to receive dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. a. On 7/29/24 at 2:01 PM Resident 17 stated transportation failed to pick her/him up from the facility for a dialysis appointment recently and she/he missed dialysis. Resident 17 further stated she/he was fluid overloaded due to missing the appointment. Progress notes indicated the following: -7/20/24 7:08 PM the provider was notified that transportation did not show up to take Resident 17 to dialysis on the morning of 7/20/24. Transportation staff stated Resident 17 did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary steroid medication for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences. Findings include: Resident 37 was admitted to the facility in 10/2021 with diagnoses including stroke and dementia. A physician's order dated 7/9/24 revealed an order for prednisone (a steroid medication) at 40 mg. Staff were to administer one tablet (40 mg) by mouth daily for five days and then administer half a tablet (20 mg) by mouth daily for four days for gout (inflammatory arthritis). A Medication Error Report dated 7/22/24 revealed Staff 10 (Agency LPN) mistakenly administered 40 mg of prednisone on 7/16/24 instead of the prescribed 20 mg. Staff 9 (LPN) discovered the error on 7/17/24. Staff 9 notified the physician and followed the directive to monitor Resident 37 for any severe reactions while continuing to administer the prednisone per the physician's order. On 7/29/24 Witness 3 (Complainant) stated Resident 37…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a dialysis contract in place for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#17) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for not receiving appropriate dialysis services. Findings include: Resident 17 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. The 5/14/24 Care Plan indicated Resident 17 received dialysis three times a week. On 8/1/24 at 1:15 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Resident 17 received dialysis from an outside provider and the facility did not have a signed contract with Resident 17's dialysis provider.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% (5 errors in 31 opportunities resulting in a 16.13% error rate) for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6, 9 and 55) observed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for medication errors. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of Physician Orders revealed a 7/31/22 order for Miralax Powder (a laxative) one time a day mixed with 4 to 8 ounces (120 to 240 milliters(ml)) of fluid. On 4/6/23 at 8:11 AM Staff 21 (CMA) was observed administering medication to Resident 6 including Miralax (a bowel medication) mixed with approximately 120 ml water. The Miralax mixed with water was left with Resident 6 with approximately 50 ml of fluid remaining. On 4/6/23 at 8:30 AM Staff 21 stated she would check on the resident later to validate if Resident 6 drank all the Miralax mixed with water. A 4/6/23 review of Resident 6's medical record revealed no evidence of an assessment or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess dental status for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#58) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for lack of dental services. Findings include: Resident 58 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including heart failure. An Annual MDS dated [DATE] documented no broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures. A Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented no broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures. On 4/3/23 at 3:50 PM Resident 58 was observed in her/his room with some missing teeth on the bottom and a lack of upper teeth. Resident 58 stated she/he had upper dentures that were loose and the bottom partial was broken. On 4/7/23 at 1:28 PM dental concerns for Resident 58 were discussed with Staff 2 (DNS) who agreed the MDS was not accurate.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide ADL care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor hygiene. Findings include: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Resident 5's care plan revised 8/2/22 indicated the resident required assistance with ADL care. Staff were to clean the resident's hands and fingers after eating with a warm washcloth and nail care was to be performed by a licensed nurse only. Observations on 4/3/23 through 4/5/23 during day and evening shifts revealed Resident 5 had a dark brown substance under her/his fingernails and around the nails. On 4/5/23 at 12:26 PM Staff 3 (Resident Care Manager), Staff 17 (Resident Care Manager) and Staff 25 (Resident Care Manager) verified Resident 5's nails were dirty and needed to be cleaned.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#s 55, 182, and 189) reviewed for medications and notification. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 55 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of 2/2023 progress notes revealed Resident 55 was sent to the hospital on 2/19/23 and was readmitted on [DATE]. A review of Resident 55's 2/2023 and 3/2023 Blood Sugar Summary revealed Resident 55 had CBG checks on 2/19/23 and 3/19/23 only. A review of 2/23/23 admission Orders revealed orders for CBG checks before meals and at bedtime. A review of Resident 55's 2/2023 through 4/4/23 medical record revealed no evidence indicating CBG checks were performed before meals and at bedtime. A review of a 3/2/23 Physician Progress Note revealed CBG checks were discontinued per resident preference. On 4/7/23 at 9:56 AM Staff 17 (Resident Care Manager) confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prevent and accurately and comprehensively assess pressure ulcers for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 2 and 186) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Resident 186 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. A review of Resident 186's Skin and Wound Evaluations from 2/6/22 through 7/1/22 revealed the resident had numerous wounds on the left and right feet. The assessments inaccurately described the wounds or were incomplete. On 4/7/23 at 11:54 AM Staff 2 (DNS) verified the assessments were not accurate or complete. 2. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including dementia. A 3/17/23 care plan indicated Resident 2 was at risk for skin impairment and pressure ulcers. Resident 2 developed a facility acquired Stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of dermis) to her/his right buttocks. The 9/12/22 through 10/17/22 Skin and Wound Evaluation Reports…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 31, 51 and 182) reviewed for accidents and smoking. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: 1. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses including lung cancer and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs). An observation on 4/3/23 at 1:34 PM revealed a small table, folding chair and a broom and dustpan outside in the parking lot of the facility. The area had trees with foliage surrounding the area. There was no ashtray or fire extinguisher. On 4/3/23 at 2:54 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 (DNS) stated the facility was a non-smoking facility but there was one resident who smoked. Staff 1 stated Resident 51 went to an area in the parking lot which had a table, chair, broom and dustpan and smoked by herself/himself or with friends and family. Staff 1 stated there was also a covered area by the entrance which Resident 51 used when the weather was bad. On 4/5/23 at 4:21 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy according to physician's orders for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#283) reviewed for respiratory services. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. Findings include: Resident 283 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including pneumonia. An Order Audit Report printed on 4/7/23 revealed an order summary from 3/27/23 for oxygen up to two L/M (liters per minute) every shift and to wean off as tolerated. A 4/2023 TAR instructed staff to administer oxygen up to two L/M. From 4/2/23 through 4/5/23, documentation showed Resident 283 received above two L/M nine times out of 10 opportunities. On 4/4/23 at 8:07 AM, Resident 283 was in bed with nasal cannula in place. The oxygen concentrator for Resident 283 was on and set at five L/M. On 4/7/23 at 9:20 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated she expected staff to contact the physician and obtain an updated order and document the change in Resident 283's clinical record.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#55) observed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for medication complications or adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 55 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including anxiety. A review of the 7/2019 FDA duloxetine (an antedepressant) delayed-release sprinkles prescribing information revealed duloxetine delayed released sprinkle capsules may be swallowed whole or opened and sprinkled over applesauce. If duloxetine sprinkles were not taken as instructed the medication would be released too quickly and at a high concentration which increased the risk for mild and severe adverse side effects and overdose. A review of Resident 55's Physician Orders revealed a 2/28/23 order for duloxetine delayed release sprinkles daily by mouth with instructions to open the capsule and mix the sprinkles inside the capsule with 30 ml applesauce or apple juice at room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS COMPANIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/1998
FOGG, PHILLIPIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/1998
BUCHER, AMYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2007
FOGG, STEVENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/16/2001
LEVEE, KATHLEENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2006
TONE, STACIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/1998
KITTRELL, RUSSIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/15/2002

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$811K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 13%Other / private 32%

This home reported $811K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$563per resident / day
operating cost
$17,117per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$562per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385077. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next