No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Marquis Plum Ridge Post Acute Rehab

1401 Bryant Williams Dr., Klamath Falls, OR 97601 · For profit - Corporation · 77 certified beds · (541) 882-6691 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (541) 882-6691 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jan 2025Resident-funds citation (F0568)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2680 Uhrmann Rd · (541) 274-2750 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2218 Shallock Ave · (541) 883-1147 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
224 Nevada Ave · (800) 682-0036 · Call to confirm hours
Park
F Kimball State Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.5%14.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.1%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.7%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.3%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened49.8%20.6%16.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.6%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.2%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.1%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine45.0%81.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.2%21.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.9%16.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.711.481.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.302.351.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 197 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.8%CMS range 60.7–73.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.2%CMS range 5.8–10.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 3.3–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
1.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
40.9%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 64.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.19 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-22)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-30)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) notifications to 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This placed residents and their representatives at risk for inadequate information to make financial and care decisions. Findings include:The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN), Form CMS-10055, is issued by the facility if the beneficiary intends to continue services and the facility believes the services may not be covered under Medicare. It is the facility's responsibility to inform the beneficiary about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with the beneficiary accepting financial liability for those services. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with Medicare Part A benefits.The SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form completed by the facility for Resident 13 indicated the resident's last covered day for Medicare Part A services was 2/18/26 and Resident 13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient bathing was provided to a dependent resident for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#70) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene. Findings included: Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including an open wound of the left buttock and respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels in the blood making it difficult to breathe).The 5/11/26 and 5/14/26 Task Bath/Shower log (CNA documentation) revealed Resident 70 declined bathing on both dates.Resident 70's clinical record revealed no documentation of follow-up or interventions related to the resident's bathing refusals.A 5/12/26 admission Social Services assessment revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact) for Resident 70.A 5/12/26 Care Plan revealed Resident 70 required one staff member to provide physical assistance for care, staff were to ensure the resident's clothing remained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to clarify and follow physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and unmet medication needs. Findings include:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including heart failure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease).The 4/2026 TAR revealed an order to obtain daily weights every day shift for Resident 3. No weights were documented on 4/16/26, 4/17/26 or 4/29/26 and weight increases exceeding two pounds were recorded as follows:-From 4/4/26 to 4/5/26: 2.2-pound increase-From 4/10/26 to 4/11/26: 3.8-pound increase-From 4/14/26 to 4/15/26: 4.8-pound increase-From 4/20/26 to 4/21/26: 2.4-pound increaseA 5/1/26 signed Medication Review Report indicated the order for daily weights every day shift was active, verbally prescribed, and had a start date of 8/1/24.The 5/2026 TAR revealed no daily weights were documented on 5/3/26, 5/9/26, 5/14/26, and 5/16/26.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#2) who was reviewed for positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for contracture progression and joint pain. Findings include: Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 8/2024 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia/hemiparesis (reduced sensation and movement with abnormal muscle tone) of the left side, and depression.The 12/23/25 Care Plan Report for Resident 2 included a restorative nursing program which included range of motion exercises for the left leg. The restorative nursing program did not include interventions for the left arm or hand.The 2/8/26 Quarterly MDS for Resident 2 indicated intact cognition and impairment of range of motion of the upper and lower extremity on one side of the body.The most recent OT Evaluation & Plan of Treatment completed on 2/16/26, reflected impaired left upper extremity range of motion in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a trauma survivor was assessed timely and received trauma-informed care for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for continued traumatization. Findings include:Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including heart failure and PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder).A 5/2/22 admission: Social Services assessment revealed Resident 3 had PTSD related to military service. The assessment indicated the resident's coping mechanisms included to try not to think about it and attendance at a PTSD support group. No revised assessment related to the resident's PTSD was found in the clinical record.Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility in 2/2026.A 2/9/26 admission: Social Service assessment did not address Resident 3's PTSD diagnosis, triggers, or coping mechanisms.The 2/27/26 Quarterly MDS assessment revealed Resident 3 had a BIMS assessment score of 15 (cognitively intact).The 4/22/26 to 5/21/26 Task:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper food temperatures were maintained during meal service for 3 of 13 sampled residents (#s 26, 52, and 70) reviewed for dining observations. This placed residents at risk for food that was not palatable or appetizing. Findings include: 1. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 3/2026 with diagnoses including compression fracture of the spine and respiratory failure. An 4/1/26 admission MDS revealed a BIMS assessment score of 14 (cognitively intact). Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in 5/2026 with diagnoses including kidney failure and diabetes. A 5/12/26 admission Social Services assessment revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). A 5/18/26 untitled document indicated Resident 70 was to receive early breakfast trays daily. On 5/18/26 at 7:25 AM an uninsulated open cart containing three covered resident meal trays was observed unattended in the hallway. On 5/18/26 at 7:40 AM, Resident 70…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow proper infection control techniques during medication administration via feeding tube for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for acquiring an infection. Findings include:The 2009 Administration of Medication via a Feeding Tube indicated, in order to administer medications via a feeding tube, staff were to gather supplies, which included: prepared medication, sterile water, towel or absorbent pad, 60ml syringe, and gloves. Staff were to perform hand hygiene and follow necessary infection control guidelines. This prevented the spread of harmful pathogens. Exposure to bodily fluids and blood would be present, so standard precautions should have been taken.Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 5/2025 with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs) and required the use of a feeding tube for medication administration.On 5/20/26 at 4:39 PM, Staff 13 (CMA) was observed to prepare medication to administer in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess the use of a physical restraints for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 1, 3, and 4) reviewed for elopement. This placed residents at risk for potential abuse or neglect. Findings include:A 6/2024 revised Use of Restraints policy identified wander guards as a physical restraint. An informed consent and pre-restraining assessment was to be completed prior to use of the restraint. Restraints were only to be used if a resident had a specific medical condition that could not be addressed by another less restrictive intervention. If the resident could not remove a device in the same manner in which the staff applied it, that device was considered a restraint. 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including disorientation and peripheral vascular disease (narrow arteries). A 3/31/25 Elopement Risk Assessment identified Resident 1 was not at risk for elopement. A 3/31/25 Progress Note indicated Resident 1's wander guard (device that alarms staff and locks a door when a resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper interventions were in place to ensure a resident remained free from accident hazards for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include:1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including disorientation, peripheral vascular disease (narrow arteries), and diabetes.A 3/31/25 Elopement Risk Assessment identified Resident 1 was not at risk for elopement.A 3/31/25 Progress note indicated Resident 1's wander guard (device that alarms staff and locks a door when a resident was near an exit) was in place. The 4/6/25 admission MDS Psychotropic CAA indicated Resident 1 had cognitive deficits, living alone was not safe, and Witness 2 (Power of Attorney) was used to assist Resident 1 with decisions about her/his health and housing needs.An 4/15/25 Utilization Review/Discharge Planning noted Resident 1 had a SLUMS (screening tool for early signs of dementia) score of nine out of 30 which indicated dementia.An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to keep confidential all information contained in the resident's records, regardless of form for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for violation of their HIPPA privacy and security rights. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 5/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes and a blood clot (thrombus). A 5/12/25 physician order indicated Resident 2 received Warfarin (anticoagulant) daily.On 5/30/25, Resident 2 was discharged from the facility. Staff 13 (LPN) stated she educated Resident 2 on the proper administration of her/his medications and placed the medications in a bag for her/him to take home.On 10/21/25 at 4:00 PM, Resident 2 stated when she/he returned to her/his residence from the facility, she/he reviewed the medications sent home and found another resident's anticoagulant (blood thinner) mixed within her/his bag.On 10/23/25 at 1:47 PM, Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed the photograph Resident 2 took of another resident's medication she/he received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper food temperatures were maintained for food trays served from 1 of 1 facility kitchens reviewed for food service and for 5 of 5 residents (#s 3, 6, 23, 37 and 266) sampled for food. This placed residents at risk for food that was not palatable, safe or appetizing. Findings include: 1. In an interview on 1/29/25 at 7:30 AM, Staff 27 (Dietary Manager) was aware residents complaints of food being served cold and not always being palatable. On 1/29/25 at 11:02 AM, nine residents attended the resident council meeting and expressed ongoing concerns regarding meals being served cold. On 1/29/25 at 12:56 PM, a lunch test tray and an alternative test tray were provided and sampled by the survey team. The lunch tray consisted of beef stroganoff with gravy, pasta, and green beans. The alternative meal test tray consisted of a French dip sandwich with au jus, grilled cheese, and tater tots. The survey team sampled the regular and alternative meals which revealed the following: *The beef…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide quarterly statements in writing of Personal Incidental Funds (PIF) to the resident representative for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for PIFs. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed of financial statements. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2013 with diagnoses including a stroke and depression. The 12/19/24 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 1 had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed Witness 4 (Family Member) was the resident's designated power of attorney. No evidence was found that Witness 4 received quarterly PIF statements. In an interview on 1/28/25 at 10:00 AM, Witness 4 stated he was Resident 1's designated representative and the resident's PIF account was managed by the facility. Witness 4 stated he had not received any quarterly statements from the facility regarding Resident 1's PIF account. In an interview on 1/29/25 at 3:19 PM, Staff 3 (Office Manager)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents to formulate an advanced directive for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3, 7, and 37) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for healthcare decisions to conflict with resident wishes. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including weakness. A 3/8/24 Annual MDS revealed Resident 3 was cognitively intact. The 3/12/24 Interdisciplinary Care Conference notes revealed Resident 3 did not have an advance directive. On 1/27/25 at 2:20 PM Resident 3 stated staff did not offer her/him an advance directive and she/he would like to have her/his options reviewed. On 1/29/25 at 11:28 AM Staff 26 (Social Service Director) stated she would review options for residents regarding advance directives in their quarterly Interdisciplinary Care Conference. On 1/30/25 at 10:54 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged staff were behind on quarterly Interdisciplinary Care Conferences, and advance directives were not being followed-up on. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#68)reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for loss of property. Findings include: Resident 68 was admitted to the facility in 4/2022 with diagnoses including cirrhosis (scarring)of the liver. On 11/8/24 a public complaint was received which alleged Resident 68 had money stolen from her/him. A 11/13/24 witness statement indicated on 11/6/24 Resident 68's bank card was run for her/his monthly liability and declined for payment. Staff 3 (Business Office Manager) notified Resident 68's power of attorney (POA) of the declined payment. On 11/8/24 Resident 68's POA notified Staff 3 Resident 68 was missing $3300 from her/his bank account and the POA made a police report. A 11/15/24 investigation indicated the Automated Teller Machine(ATM)withdrawals were made from an ATM near the facility. Law enforcement retrieved the video recording from the ATM and the parking lot. The facility assisted law enforcement with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate alleged verbal abuse from staff for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for physical and verbal abuse from staff. Findings include: The facility's 12/2020 Abuse Investigation Policy included: All reports of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and injuries of unknown origin shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated. The investigation shall consist of: -A review of the completed Resident Incident Report Form. -An interview with the resident. -Witness reports in writing, signed and dated. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023 with diagnoses including respiratory failure. The 1/21/25 investigation report indicated Staff 8 (LPN) reported to Staff 28 (RNCM) Resident 7 reported an allegation of abuse. Resident 7 indicated she/he was forced out of bed and forced to take a shower by Staff 18 (RN). On 1/28/25 at 2:37 PM Resident 7 stated Staff 18 came to her/his room and stated she/he had to take a shower. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences as required for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3, 7, and 37) reviewed for care conferences. This placed residents at risk for lack of participation in care goals and unmet needs. Findings include: The 11/2017 facility Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team Policy and Procedure indicated the resident's comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and updated at a minimal on a quarterly basis by the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team.) 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including weakness. A review of the 3/12/24 Interdisciplinary Team Care Plan Conference Form for Resident 3 revealed no quarterly care conferences were provided after 3/12/24. On 1/27/25 at 1:20 PM Resident 3 stated she/he had not had a care conference in months and had concerns she/he would like to discuss with staff. On 1/30/25 at 10:54 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed quarterly care conferences were not conducted with Resident 3 to address care plan needs quarterly. 2. Resident 7 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pressure injury wounds were accurately assessed, and care plans were followed for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3 and 31) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessment and worsening of wounds. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including a Stage 4 (penetration of all three layers of skin exposing muscles, tendons and bones) pressure ulcer. The 12/29/24, 1/5/25, 1/14/25, and 1/19/25 Wound Evaluation Form indicated Resident 3 had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. The wound contained slough (dead skin tissue) which indicated an unstageable (with dead tissues making it impossible to determine the depth of the wound) pressure ulcer. On 1/29/25 at 1:36 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Resident 6's wound was not a Stage 4 pressure ulcer but an unstageable pressure ulcer due to the slough in the wound, and the Wound Evaluation Form was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for misappropriation of property. This failure, determined to be a past non-compliance situation, resulted from the facility failing to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property. Findings include: A FRI report dated 6/16/23 indicated a staff member found unrecognizable signatures in the Narcotic Log Book, brought it to the attention of the Resident Care Manager and Staff 2 (DNS) and an investigation was started. Multiple forged signatures were found in the skilled unit Log Book. The FRI indicated there was no resident theft as the facility covered the cost of medications. Staff 11 (Former CMA) was identified as a suspect and was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. A Facility Investigation document dated 6/13/23 indicated during the investigation 102 instances of forged or false signatures were found. Staff 11 worked around the times of the discovered forged signatures. No other staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#45) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for improper medication administration. Findings include: Resident 45 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and a feeding tube (a tube in the stomach to receive nutrition) with diagnoses including malnutrition and kidney transplant. On 10/2/23 at 8:54 AM Resident 45 was observed sitting up in bed with two medication cups containing multiple medications on the bedside table and a cup of orange liquid medication. Resident 45 stated she/he was not sure what the medications were. No assessment was located in the medical record for self-administration of medications for Resident 45. On 10/2/23 at 11:23 AM Staff 36 (LPN) stated if Resident 45 did not administer her/his medications by 11:00 AM staff were to administer the medications via her/his feeding tube. Staff 36 stated she was not aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents to formulate advance directives for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 55 and 68) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for healthcare decisions to be in conflict with their wishes. Findings include: 1. Resident 55 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. A 6/23/23 admission MDS revealed Resident 55 was moderately cognitively impaired. A 7/5/23 Multidisciplinary Care Conference revealed there was no advance directive planning in place and Resident 55 wanted follow up to have options reviewed. On 10/3/23 at 3:14 PM Staff 24 (Social Services Director) confirmed Resident 55 did not have advance directive planning in place and options would be reviewed during her/his next care conference (approximately three months after Resident 55's request for advance directive follow-up). On 10/5/23 at 2:48 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged follow up after a request for advance directive planning should be within a week. 2. Resident 68 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a physician of an unavailable medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#23) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of adequate treatment. Findings include: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including UTI and sepsis (harmful microorganisms in the blood leading to the malfunction of organs). A 5/31/23 physician order indicated Resident 23 was to receive Lactobacillus Rhamnosus (supplement used to restore normal intestinal bacteria and treat UTIs) each morning. The 9/2023 MAR indicated for 15 of 30 days the supplement was unavailable. A review of Resident 23's clinical record revealed the physician was not notified the supplement was unavailable. On 10/4/23 at 9:06 AM Staff 5 (RNCM) acknowledged Resident 23's physician was not notified the facility did not have the prescribed supplement available for the resident as above.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's grievance was resolved in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns. Findings include: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including anxiety. A Concerns and Grievances Policy last revised 2016 revealed any resident or resident representative could report a concern. The social service director was responsible for overseeing the grievance process. The facility would investigate the concern and resolve the grievance promptly; within five days. The administrator would review the findings upon completion of the investigation. The resident would be notified of the summary of findings and outcome. A 6/2/23 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 31 was cognitively intact and did not have delusions (beliefs that were firmly held, contrary to reality). A 6/15/23 Lost Resident Property Investigation Report revealed Resident 31 reported a pair of pants was missing. An 8/2/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident care plans were updated and failed to conduct a care conferences for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 20 and 63) reviewed for dental care, and participation in care planning. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including dementia. A 6/3/23 Progress Note revealed a CNA found Resident 20's bottom denture in the denture cup and the denture was broken. A Care Plan last updated 12/2019 revealed the resident had both upper and lower dentures. On 10/3/23 at 3:55 PM Staff 4 (RNCM) acknowledged the resident's care plan was not updated after the resident's denture broke. 2. Resident 63 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including cancer. On 10/2/23 at 12:56 PM Resident 63 stated the facility kept her/him informed but did not recall a care conference with the team. On 10/4/23 at 9:02 AM Staff 23 (Resident Care Manager) stated the facility did not conduct initial care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered to walk for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#31) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for increased weakness. Findings include: Resident 31 admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including heart disease. A care plan last revised on 2/24/23 revealed Resident 31 had a restorative program to improve the resident's endurance. Staff were to offer the resident to walk before lunch and the resident would decide if and how far she/he would walk. A 3/2023 Annual CAA revealed Resident 3 was alert, oriented and was able to transfer independently but was unstable. The resident used her/his walker and staff assisted with the management of the resident's oxygen equipment. Staff were to encourage the resident to walk. An 8/25/23 Quarterly Nursing Summary indicated Resident 31 was alert, oriented and had an ambulation program. The resident did not want to come out of her/his room due to COVID-19 but walked in her/his room. Staff were to continue to offer walks and the distance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a meaningful activity program for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of daily stimulation. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including a stroke. An 4/26/23 Activities Summary revealed the resident continued to prefer to spend time napping, watching television, going outside when the weather was 80 degrees and looking out the window. A 7/26/23 Activities Summary revealed Resident 30 spent the majority of her/his time in her/his room sleeping and watching television. A Care Plan revised on 8/5/22 revealed the activity staff were to offer and assist Resident 30 outside when the temperature met the resident's preferred environmental temperature. Staff were to also offer to open the resident's window blinds. Review of Outdoor Activity documentation from 9/3/23 through 10/3/23 revealed the resident looked out the window on two occasions. There was no documentation to indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were given per pharmacy guidelines for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#36) reviewed for antibiotics. This placed residents at risk for decreased medication efficacy (effectiveness). Findings include: Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including a hardware infection. Epocrates online (web based pharmacy resource) revealed when doxycycline and calcium carbonate were administered together the efficacy of the antibiotic was decreased. An 10/2023 Order Summary Report revealed Resident 36 was to be administered calcium carbonate-vitamin D tablet (supplement) in the morning and doxycycline (antibiotic) two times a day. An 10/2023 MAR revealed Resident 36 was administered both the calcium carbonate-vitamin D and the doxycycline daily at 8:00 AM. On 10/2/23 at 10:10 AM and on 10/4/23 at 10:44 AM Resident 36 stated she/he had elbow surgery and was on an antibiotic. Resident 36 stated the antibiotic and calcium should not be given together and she/he told multiple staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided range of motion for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for pain. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses including a stroke. A Physical Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a contracture (shortening of the muscle or tendon) to the left ankle and the resident and family did not want a brace or aggressive ROM to the ankle. The note indicated per care conference the resident was willing to do active ROM with the legs, a restorative nursing program was designed and instructions were given. A 11/18/22 Annual CAA revealed Resident 30 had a stroke and was not able to move her/his right side. The resident was dependent on others for assistance with most ADLs, but was able to feed her/himself. The resident did not always understand she/he required positioning assistance. The resident spent most of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate urinary care for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#23) reviewed for urinary catheters. This placed residents at risk for lack of preferred urinary care treatment. Findings include: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including UTI and sepsis (harmful microorganisms in the blood leading to the malfunction of organs). A 6/5/23 admission Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter CAA revealed Resident 23 had a personal PureWick (external catheter system that draws urine away from body) system and asked to keep the PureWick system on at all times instead of bladder training. Staff were to clean and change the PureWick per manufacturer's instructions. A 6/7/23 revised care plan revealed Resident 23 used a Purewick system and staff were instructed to separate the resident's legs, gluteus (buttock) muscles and genitals and gently tuck the soft gauze side of the device between the gluteus and genitals and ensure the top of the gauze was aligned with her/his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide dialysis services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#24) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for unmet dialysis needs. Findings include: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including kidney disease. A 7/15/23 revised care plan revealed Resident 24 had kidney failure with dialysis, and did not include the days of dialysis, location, and times. There was no information related to dialysis emergency procedures and blood pressure monitoring for Resident 24. On 10/2/23 at 3:18 PM Resident 24 was observed in bed and stated she/he recently returned from dialysis. Resident 24 stated staff took her/his blood pressure when she/he returned, but she/he had to remind staff not to use the arm with the dialysis access site to measure the blood pressure. Resident 24 stated this happened often. On 10/5/23 at 1:55 PM Staff 16 (CNA), and Staff 27 (CNA) stated they did not have dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#23) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions. Findings include: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including inflammation of the spine. A 5/30/23 physician order indicated Resident 23 was to receive one percent Diclofenac Sodium External Gel (topical pain relief) applied to the affected area four times a day for pain. A 7/25/23 Pharmacist's Report to Nursing and 8/30/23 Pharmacist's Recommendation to the Provider indicated instructions for the Diclofenanc Gel was to include maximum limits of eight grams per day to Resident 23's upper extremity or 32 grams per day over her/his entire body. On 10/4/23 at 9:06 AM Staff 5 (RNCM) stated Resident 23's pain was related to her/his back. Staff 5 acknowledged the pharmacy recommendation for Resident 23 was not addressed and an improved process to review pharmacy recommendations was needed.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent. There were 31 medication administration observations with 12 errors; a 39 percent medication error rate. This placed residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings include: Resident 45 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and a feeding tube. The 9/1/23 Physician Order indicated Resident 45 was to receive the following medications by mouth: -Amlodipine (for blood pressure) by mouth -Vitamin D (supplement) by mouth -Potassium (supplement) by mouth -Apixiban (blood thinner) twice a day by mouth -Escitalopram (for depression) by mouth -Pantoprazole (for GERD) by mouth -Prednisone (steroid) by mouth -Super B complex (supplement) by mouth -D-Manose (supplement) by mouth -Mycophenolate (immnosuppressant) twice a day by mouth -Omega 3 (supplement) twice a day by mouth -Cyclosporine (immnosuppressant) twice a day by mouth On 10/4/23 at 11:18 AM Staff 36 (LPN) crushed Resident 45's medication and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 23, 28, and 36) reviewed for urinary devices. This placed residents at risk for urinary infection. Findings include. 1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including UTI and sepsis (harmful microorganisms in the blood leading to the malfunction of organs). A 6/5/23 admission Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter CAA revealed Resident 23 had a personal PureWick (external catheter system that draws urine away from body) system and asked to keep the PureWick system on at all times instead of bladder training. Staff were to clean and change the PureWick device per manufacturer's instructions. A 6/7/23 revised care plan revealed Resident 23 used a PureWick system. The care plan did not indicate how the gauze was to be stored if not in use. On 10/2/23 at 8:55 AM and 10/3/23 at 2:24 PM Resident 23 was observed with her/his PureWick not in use. The PureWick gauze was uncovered and placed on top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received vaccines and education for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 16, 30, and 39) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for infections. Findings include: 1. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. a. Resident 16's record revealed she/he received the flu vaccine on 11/5/22. The resident's record did not have documentation to indicate the resident received the risk and benefits of receiving the flu vaccine prior to administration. On 10/5/23 at 10:41 AM a request was made to Staff 2 (DNS) to provide documentation the risk and benefits of the flu vaccine were provided to the resident prior to the vaccine. No additional information was provided. b. Resident 16's record revealed the resident received a pneumonia vaccine in 2001 outside of the facility. Resident 16 was eligible for an additional pneumonia vaccine. There was no documentation in the resident's record to indicate the resident was offered additional pneumonia vaccines.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS COMPANIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 10/01/2018
FOGG, PHILLIPIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/22/2012
FOGG, STEVENIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/22/2018
SPRANDO, ERINIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
TONE, STACIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/22/2012
PRATHER, CHRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$653K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 20%Other / private 26%

This home reported $653K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$493per resident / day
operating cost
$14,975per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$561per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385137. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next