Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 66.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed the care plan related to fall safety and provide sufficient supervision to prevent a fall for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 306 and 47) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in resident 306 having a fall with serious injury including a left shoulder fracture, a rib fracture and periprosthetic fracture involving the left greater trochanter (fracture of a previously-repaired hip) which required emergency medical services and treatment at the hospital. Findings include: 1. Resident 306 was admitted to the facility 1/2023 with diagnoses including right leg fracture and right shoulder fracture. A review of Resident 306's 1/17/23 admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance from two or more staff to transfer on and off the toilet. Resident 306's care plan dated 1/11/23 directed caregivers to provide her/him with two person stand pivot physical assist to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse to the State Agency for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 12/2025 with diagnoses including hip fracture and anxiety.On 3/23/26 at 10:42 AM Resident 2 stated there was a CNA who was kind of rough with her/him told her/him to take her/himself to the bathroom and to not get out of bed until 6:00 AM. Resident 2 thought the incident occurred about a month ago.The facility's investigation dated 1/29/26 documented Resident 2 reported the allegation of abuse involving Staff 6 (CNA) to Staff 7 (SSD) on 1/29/26 at 4:00 PM. Staff 6 was sent home pending investigation. The Facility Reported Incident form was received by the State Agency on 1/30/26 at 2:13 PM.On 3/23/26 at 2:24 PM, Staff 7 stated Resident 2 told her that Staff 6 was abusive to her/him at 4:00 PM on 1/29/26.On 3/23/26 at 12:14 PM, Staff 6 denied abusing Resident 2 or any resident.On 3/24/26 at 1:13 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide maintenance to maintain a safe, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for physical environment. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe and unkempt interior building. Findings include: 1. Observations of the facility's general environment from 8/18/25 through 8/22/25 identified the following issues: -Eight of eight hanging light fixtures in the dining room contained multiple dead insects visibly trapped inside the covers. -Two visibly dusty portable oscillating fans, positioned on each side of the dining room tables and approximately six feet away from the seated residents, were actively blowing air toward them. -Nine of nine floor vents in the dining room were coated in thick layers of dust, debris and visible cobwebs. -A visibly dirty floor fan placed on top of a refrigerator was operating and blowing air across multiple zones in the kitchen including the coffee maker station, an area with dirty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled in a way to minimize food spoilage in 1 of 2 unit refrigerators and safe food storage handling techniques for 1 of 1 meal service reviewed for kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential infections related to foodborne pathogens and cross contamination. Findings include:1. On 8/21/25 at 9:38 AM observations of the facility's East unit refrigerator revealed the following items: an undated plastic container with a meal ticket on top dated 8/11/25, a plastic container dated 8/11/25, an undated container of spaghetti, and an undated container of rice with mixed vegetables. On 8/21/25 at 9:45 AM, Staff 9 (Dietary Manger) stated housekeeping was responsible for the maintenance of facility unit refrigerators. On 8/21/25 at 11:40 AM, Staff 34 (Housekeeper) stated she was unaware of the polices for food storage in facility's unit refrigerators. On 8/21/25 at 11:49 AM, Staff 8 (Maintenance Director) stated a designated housekeeper cleaned the facility's unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for 2 of 2 residents (#1 and 18) reviewed for catheter care and pressure ulcers pressure ulcer. This placed resident at risk for infection. Findings include: The facility's 3/2024 Isolation- Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions Policy specified the following: Residents with open complex wounds that require a dressing are included in EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) per CDC guidelines. PPE (personal protective equipment) is donned prior to high contact activity like bathing and wound care. 1.Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 7/2025 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (A lack of blood flow to the brain). The 7/31/25 Care Plan indicated EBP was initiated on 8/20/25. On 8/18/25 through 8/21/25 from 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM no signs were posted outside Resident 18’s room to indicated staff were to follow EBP. On 8/18/25 at 10:04 AM, Resident 18 was observed in her/his wheelchair in her/his room with the left leg elevated. Resident 18 wore a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to implement a physician order on the care plan for thickened liquids for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#36) investigated for hydration. This placed residents at risk for choking and aspiration. Findings include: Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). The Annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 36 was cognitively impaired for decision-making and independent for eating and drinking after set-up.On 7/23/25 Resident 36 returned from the hospital with orders for mildly thickened liquids.Resident 36's 7/23/25 Nutrition Care Plan did not include the current mildly thickened fluid status.On 8/19/25 at 11:36 AM Resident 36 was observed with a large plastic cup of liquid within reach on her/his bedside table. Staff 13 (CNA) confirmed the cup in Resident 36's room contained thin liquids. On 8/21/25 at 11:28 AM a white paper cup was observed on the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed was in good repair for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for potential injury. Findings include:Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder and malnutrition. Resident 8's 7/21/25 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact. On 8/18/25 at 10:38 AM, Resident 8 stated the foot board of her/his bed was broken and had not been fixed. A review of maintenance work orders from 7/1/25 through 8/18/25 revealed no evidence a request was submitted for Resident 8's foot board to be repaired. On 8/19/25 at 2:43 PM, Resident 8 was observed placing pressure on the left side of the foot board, which was unsecured and elevated the right side of the bed. The resident stated the foot board was broken since 8/11/25. On 8/19/25 at 3:13 PM, Staff 16 (CNA) stated she was aware Resident 8's foot board was broken on 8/11/25 when she noticed it was no longer secured to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) in a timely fashion for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification. This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities. Findings include: Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of cognitive functioning) and emphysema (a lung condition that causes shortness of breath). A review of resident 47's 4/1/24 quarterly MDS revealed she/he had impaired short- and long-term memory loss and moderately impaired decision-making skills. On 5/1/24 at 2:27 PM Staff 10 (admission Director) stated Resident 47's last covered day of Medicare Part A services was 4/1/24. A review of Resident 47's medical record revealed the facility provided Resident 47's representative with a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage on 4/1/24. On 5/3/24 at 10:37 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated, We should be giving residents 48 hour notice so they are aware…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 34 and 29) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility in 1/2020 with diagnoses including history of traumatic brain injury and mental disorder due to a known physiological (related to the body) condition. Resident 34's 1/27/20 Socially Inappropriate Behavior Care Plan indicated the following: -The resident may get too physically close to others and talk nonstop to them. -The resident required reminders and encouragement to provide a safe distance between her/himself and others. -The resident may need to be redirected away from others should she/he talk too much, make negative/inappropriate statements, become an irritant to others or make inappropriate accusations towards others. Resident 34's 4/5/22 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 47 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a new/accurate Level I PASARR when the facility became aware of indicators of a serious mental illness diagnoses and failed to complete a referral for a Level ll PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) for 1 of 5 residents (# 46) reviewed for medications. This placed residents with a mental health disorder at risk for delayed care, emotional distress related to mental illness and lack of services to attain their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: Resident 46 admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including Psychotic Disorder with delusions (mental condition), Delusional Disorder (serious mental condition making it difficult to tell what is real), Dementia with behaviors, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder and anxiety. A PASARR 1 (no indication of a serious mental illness) was completed from the hospital upon admission on [DATE] for Resident 46. Resident 46's current care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a person centered comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident (#53) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 53 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (intracranial bleeding) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). A review of Resident 53's 3/26/24 admission MDS revealed she/he had moderate cognitive impairment and needed an interpreter to communicate with her/his doctor or facility staff. Resident 53's care plan dated 3/28/24 indicated her/his primary languages were Chinese/Taiwanese/Cantonese and she/he had impaired communication skills related to a language barrier. On 5/1/24 at 10:06 AM Resident 53 was observed in the dining room speaking loudly in Chinese to Staff 22 (CNA). Staff 22 removed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-05-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS COMPANIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $549K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR