Marquis Care At Centennial Hills

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 85.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.14 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.85 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was clarified and the accurate amount of medication and water was documented per the physician's order for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 10). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident not receiving the maximum therapeutic effect of the medication and inaccurate documentation of the resident's fluid intake. Findings include: Resident 10 (R10) R10 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including gastrostomy status (a surgical procedure used to insert a tube, often referred to as a G-tube, through the abdomen and into the stomach) and dependence on respirator (ventilator) status. The physician's order dated 12/10/2024, documented Protein Gel/Liquid (medication) 30 milliliters (ml) two times a day, mix in water if administered via enteral tube (G-tube), flush with 30 ml before and after administration. Document total consumed of Protein Gel and water. R10's Medication Administration Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were provided per therapy recommendations for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 40). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident's further decline in range of motion (extent of movement a joint could perform). Findings include: Resident 40 (R40) R40 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia, tracheostomy status, and bed confinement status. R40's Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge summary dated [DATE], documented the following: - Discharge Location: Resident discharged to reside in the facility. - Discharge Reason: Need for Skilled Services Ended. - Discharge Recommendations: Equipment / Other Recommendations: Hand rolls and positioning - Follow-Up Programs Established / Trained = Home Exercise Program (HEP) - Program Initiated / Established: Upper Extremity HEP R40's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the resident had impairment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure Oxygen (O2) was administered according to physician's orders for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 31). The deficient practice had the potential to lead to O2 toxicity and exacerbation of the residents' underlying health conditions. Findings include: Resident 31 (R31) R31 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, and adult failure to thrive. On 06/24/2025 at 9:31 AM, R31 was lying in bed and receiving O2 via nasal cannula (NC) connected to an Oxygen concentrator (a medical device that separates oxygen from air, providing a higher concentration of oxygen to individuals who need supplemental oxygen therapy). The concentrator was turned on and set at 2.5 liters per minute (LPM). A physician order dated 03/15/2023 documented Oxygen at 2 LPM via NC continuously. R 31's Care Plan dated 05/13/2025, documented R31 had inadequate compromised respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the medication as ordered for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 243). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident having adverse events for not receiving physician prescribed medication. Findings include: Resident 243 (R243) R243 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications and hyperlipidemia. The physician's order dated 06/16/2025 at 8:55 PM, documented Semaglutide Oral Tablet 7 milligrams (mg) by mouth in the morning related to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. The start date was 06/17/2025. The order was discontinued on 06/19/2025 at 2:28 PM and the reason was clarification. The physician's order dated 06/19/2025 at 2:28 PM, documented Semaglutide Oral Tablet 7 mg by mouth in the morning related to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. The start date was 06/21/2025. The Interdisciplinary (IDT) Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to discard expired milk stored in a refrigerator located in the kitchen, an ice pack in the first floor nourishment room freezer, and employee food from the freezer located in second floor nourishment room. The deficient practice has the potential to lead to bacterial growth and foodborne illnesses. Findings include: On 06/24/2025 at 8:00 AM, the milk refrigerator located in the kitchen, had a quart of expired silk milk dated 06/13/2025. On 06/24/2025 at 8:20 AM, the nourishment room located on the first floor, had an ice pack placed in the resident freezer. On 06/24/2025 at 8:30 AM, the nourishment room located on the second floor, had employee personal food items inside the nourishment freezer, which included a protein shake and a pizza. On 06/24/2025 at 8:02 AM, the Director of food and nutrition, verified the milk was expired and should have been discarded. On 06/24/2025 at 8:22 AM, the Charge Nurse (CN) stated the ice packs are used for residents if they have pain and expressed the ice packs should not be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to update discharge instructions and failed to notify the physician of the changes in the discharge plan for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential for a resident not to receive the necessary provisions for continuation of care. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 02/18/2025 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, atrial fibrillation, and unstageable pressure ulcer site unspecified. The physician Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented to discharge R1 home with home health, Registered Nurse (RN), Physical Therapy (PT), and Occupational therapy (OT) for maximizing strength and safety. A discharge order request dated 02/18/2025 documented discharge services of home health, nursing, PT, OT, social worker, bath aide and wound care three times a week for pressure wound on sacrum and right heel. An Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) discharge note date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence wound care treatments were provided per the physician's order for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for delayed healing of a wound. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 02/18/2025 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, atrial fibrillation, and unstageable pressure ulcer site unspecified. A physician's order dated 12/05/2024 documented Silvadene External Cream 1 % (Silver Sulfadiazine) apply to sacrum topically every day shift, every other day for skin impairment. Cleanse stage 3 pressure injury to sacrum with normal saline and pat dry, apply no sting skin prep to surrounding skin, apply Silvadene/ Triad mix to wound bed, cover with calcium alginate then cover with dry dressing. R1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the stage 3 pressure area of the sacrum lacked documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence a resident's midline (a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a large vein of the upper arm used to administer medication into the bloodstream) was removed, and a site assessment was performed upon discharge for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for an increased risk of infection and to compromise the residents' health. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 02/18/2025 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, atrial fibrillation, and unstageable pressure ulcer site unspecified. A physician's order dated 02/18/2025 documented to discontinue midline related to completion of intravenous (IV) medication regimen. On 02/20/2025 at 2:35 PM, a Registered Nurse (RN) stated when an order for the midline removal was received from the physician, the removal was documented in the progress notes and was to include an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for the use of bilateral mitten restraints for a resident was completed accurately and consent for the mitten restraints was obtained from the resident or the appropriate representative for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #44). The deficient practice had the potential to cause physical and psychosocial harm to the resident. Findings include: Resident #44 (R44) Resident # 44 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hypoxemia, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy. Assessment: On 07/23/2024 at 3:21 PM, Resident #44 was observed wearing bilateral hand mitts (a restrictive type of mitten to prevent residents from pulling out invasive devices such as intravenous lines, feeding or airway tubes). The active care plan details Resident #44 was ventilator dependent, at risk for skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level two referral was completed for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #36). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident of concern and other residents of necessary behavioral health services. Resident #36 (R36) R36 was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pulmonary edema, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anxiety disorder, mood disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and major depressive disorder. On 07/23/2024 in the afternoon, R36 was sitting on the bed. R36 stated had been at the facility for about 8 years and the care and services at the facility were good. A PASARR level one document dated 12/27/2016, revealed R36 did not have dementia, mental illness (MI), intellectual disability, (ID) mental retardation (MR) or any related condition (RC) and was deemed appropriate for nursing facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS COMPANIES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $598K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV