Providence Little Comp Of Mary Subacute Care Ctr
1322 West Sixth Street, San Pedro, CA 90732 · Non profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (310) 791-4518 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0604), cited Dec 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $11,170 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-14)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 7.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 8.1% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 15.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 98.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 8.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 8.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 8.90 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.15 to 1.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-12-14 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of seven sampled residents (Residents 39, 45, 20, 11, 68 and 27) were free of unnecessary physical restraints (devices that limit a patient's movement) by failing to: 1. Ensure six of seven residents (Residents 39, 45, 20, 11, 68 and 27) were free from physical restraints. 2. Follow the Physical Restraint Elimination Assessment (assessment used by the facility for restrained residents to determine whether they are candidates for restraint reduction, score of 0-20 is a priority candidate, 21-35 good candidate, and 35 and above is a poor candidate) for Residents 39, 45, 20, 11, 68 and 27, monthly to assess for the need of physical restraint continued used. 3. Release physical restraint every two (2) hours for 15 minutes to ensure good blood circulation (the flow of fluid, especially blood) to upper extremities and assess skin integrity (the skin being whole, intact, and undamaged) for Residents 39, 45, 20, 11, 68 and 27. 4. Use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received timely and appropriate Activities of Daily Living (ADL-activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily) care for three of six sampled residents (Resident 42, Resident 51 and Resident 72). The facility failed to:1.Provide incontinent care to Resident 51 and Resident 72 in a timely manner and not leave the residents with soiled incontinence briefs (absorbent, disposable underwear with fastening tabs on both sides) for an extended time.2. Suction (a procedure that is done to help keep a resident 's airway open and free of mucus) Resident 42 's mouth and right nostril who required suctioning to keep airway (the path that air and oxygen to get in and out of the body) clear from secretions (phlegm and saliva).These failures placed Resident 51 and Resident 72 at risk for discomfort, increased risk for skin breakdown, infection and had the potential to put Resident 42 at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment in the kitchen for all residents by failing to:a. Ensure cooking oil, powdered brown gravy, cream of wheat, pancake mix and corn starch had open dates.b. Ensure disposable food containers were stored in a sanitary manner.c. Ensure the utility carts in the clean area were free from crumbs, dried food particles and grime (dirt).d. Ensure open aluminum cans were not stored at the workstation.These failures had the potential to expose residents to food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or parasites) and put residents at risk for cross contamination (unintentional transfer of harmful bacteria from one object to another).Findings:During an observation on 1/26/2026 at 8:15 am in the kitchen, multiple open food items cooking oil, powdered brown gravy, cream of wheat, pancake mix and corn starch were observed without open dates. There was an observation of clean disposable food containers that were stored in a plastic bin with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the trash receptable was covered, not overflowing with trash and disposed of properly outside the kitchen.This failure had the potential to attract pest/rodents, pose health risk and cause infection control violations.Findings:During an observation on 1/26/26 at 9:12 am outside of the kitchen, there was trash stored in two trash cans that were not covered and one was overflowing with trash.During an interview on 1/29/26 at 9:15 am with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated there were two trash cans that were not covered and one was overflowing with trash. The DS stated trash cans should not be overflowing with trash and that they should be covered to prevent the possibility of attracting pests like flies, ants and rodents.During an interview on 1/30/2026 at 7:26 am with the Director of Nurses (DON), the DON stated trash cans should not be overflowing with trash and need to be covered. The DON stated there could be issues with pest control when trash is not disposed of properly.During a review of the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 105) was provided with an adaptive call light (specialized device for patients with limited mobility) upon admission.This failure put Resident 105's at risk for falls, delay of care, and emotional neglect.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/26/26 at 2:14 pm at Resident 105's bedside, Resident 105 was able to mouthed the words that he did not have a call light and could not move his body.During a review of Resident 105's admission Record (Face sheet), dated 1/28/26, the admission record indicated Resident 105 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 105's diagnosis included hemorrhagic stroke (bleeding in the brain), quadriplegic (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury), respiratory failure (lung disease) and GERD (indigestion).During a review of Resident 105's Physical Therapy (PT) Initial Evaluation, dated 1/26/26, the PT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 10) had a Level 2 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) assessment done when diagnosed with a mental illness prior to admission.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 10 not receiving the necessary services and appropriate psychiatric level of treatment and evaluation in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 10's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 10 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 10 had diagnoses including cerebral palsy (the most common motor disability in childhood, affecting movement, balance, and posture), intellectual disability (a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual functioning (such as learning,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized and person-centered care plan for two of six residents (Resident 8 and Resident 15) by failing to:a. Develop a new care plan when Resident 8 rash reoccurred.b. Implement the care plan for monitoring Resident 15's inappropriate sexual behavior and providing a psychiatric (relating to mental illness and its treatment) consult to assess Resident 15's behavior.These failures had the potential to put Resident 8 and Resident 15 at risk not to receive the necessary care and services to meet their needs which could compromise Resident 8 and Resident 15 physical and psychosocial well-being.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 8's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) dated 1/28/2026. The Face Sheet indicated that Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility. During a review of Resident 8's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/14/25, the H&P indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 8) was seen by a Dermatologist (doctor who specializes in skin disorders) for an unresolved whole-body rash that started on 7/18/2025.This failure caused Resident 8 to suffer with discomfort and itching and had the potential for infection, sleep disruption and emotional distress.Findings:During an observation on 1/26/26 at 2:04 p.m. at Resident 8's bedside, Resident 8 had scattered rashes with red patches all over his body.During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (Face sheet), dated 1/28/26, the admission record indicated Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 8 had diagnosis including quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury), chronic respiratory failure (lung disease), ventilator dependent (machine that moves air in and out of the lungs), gastrostomy tube ([GT] a soft tube surgically inserted directly into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 15) with behavioral problems was adequately monitored and received the necessary care and services by failing to:Monitor Resident 15's inappropriate sexual behavior towards female and implement plan of care.Provide psychiatric (relating to mental illness and its treatment) care to evaluate and assess Resident 15's inappropriate sexual behavior.This failure placed Resident 15 at risk with a delay in psychosocial (having to do with the mental, emotional, and spiritual aspects of a person's life) needs/care which had the potential for worsening behavior that could pose a danger to other residents.Findings:During a review of Resident 15's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) the Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] to the facility. Resident 15 had diagnoses including Pneumonia (PNA-an infection/inflammation in the lungs)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review, the facility failed to observe infection control practices for one of six sampled residents (Resident 34) by failing to:1. Ensure the linen hamper lid was closed and not overflowing with dirty gowns in Resident 34's bathroom.This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products) and spread of infection among the residents, staff and visitors in the facility.Findings:During an observation on 1/26/2026 at 9:31 a.m. in Resident 34's bathroom, a linen hamper had an open lid filled with soiled non-disposable isolation gowns that were hanging outside the hamper. There was an observation of signage for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP-infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi drug resistant organism [MDRO, superbug bacteria or germs that have changed to resist many…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 22) and resident representatives were provided education regarding the risks and benefits of refusing influenza (flu - a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs) vaccination.This failure had the potential to result in the resident or resident representative making uninformed decisions regarding refusal of influenza vaccine, increasing the risk for vaccine-preventable illness, complications, hospitalization, and transmission of infection within the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 22's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 22 on 1/7/2026 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a long-term condition where the lungs cannot adequately transfer oxygen into the blood, resulting in low blood oxygen levels)During a review of Resident 22's history and physical (H&P) dated 11/21/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 22 was nonverbal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when: 1.Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) provided care to Patient 2 then proceeded to Patient 1s bedside without changing CNA 1s personal protective equipment (PPE) gown prior to initiating care for Patient 1. 2.CNA 2 placed clean linen intended for Patient 1 on top of a used soiled linen cart and proceeded to Patient 1s bedside to initiate care. These deficient practices had the potential to cause cross-contamination (the unintentional physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) of infectious pathogens (bacteria and microorganisms) from patient to patient and/or within the facility. Findings: During an observation on 1/15/25 at 10:30 AM, an Enhanced Barrier Precautions ([EBP] measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of infection) sign is posted outside Patient 1s door which indicated when entering the room, providers and staff must apply a gown and gloves. This is a double occupancy room with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices when: 1.Several food items were not dated for thaw date in the walk-in refrigerator. One box of pepperoni was stored uncovered in the walk-in freezer. One medium container of black beans with expire date of 12/1/2024, one large container of blueberry sauce for toppings and one large container of cooked apple with an expire date of 11/30/2024 exceeding storage period for the food were stored in the reach in refrigerator. Two boxes of (baked pastry) and one package of sliced ready to eat turkey deli meat were stored on the shelf next to raw shelled eggs. One box of raw chicken thighs thawing on the shelf next to raw ground beef. This had the potential to cross contaminate food and result in food borne illness in 14 residents who received food from the kitchen. 2. Ice machine was not maintained in a sanitary manner and the inside compartment of the ice machine was stained and dirty. This deficient practice had the potential to cross contaminate food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the trash stored in the dumpster areas located in the loading and food delivery area behind the kitchen were maintained in a sanitary manner. One of six garbage dumpsters had the lid open, the dumpster was uncovered and overfilled with cardboard, and trash. There were disposable gloves, plastic, paper, and food on the ground surrounding the trash dumpsters. The trash was in the loading and food delivery area next to the kitchen back door. This deficient practice had the potential for harborage and feeding of pests, which may be attracted into the facility kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Food Service Director (FSD) on 12/3/2024 at 11:15AM, there were a total of six large trash bins. One trash bin was full of cardboard boxes and bags of trash, the dumpster was overfilled and not covered. There was trash on the floor including disposable gloves, paper, plastic wraps, and food. During a concurrent interview with the FSD, the FSD stated housekeeping is responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (the cause of injury was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 41) when Resident 41 developed a blood (a fluid-filled sac in the outer layer of skin) blister on the right big toe of the right foot. This failure had the potential to result into a delayed investigation to rule out abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (condition when the lungs are not able to effectively take in oxygen and remove carbon dioxide from the blood), cerebral vascular accident (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the windpipe to allow air to fill the lungs) in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 84 and Resident 96) were free of unnecessary psychotropic (any drug that affects the brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 84 and Resident 96 were provided with non-pharmacological interventions (intervention that does not primarily use medicine before administering a prn (as needed) psychotropic medication. 2. Ensure prn psychotropic medication use had not exceeded 14 days. These failures placed Resident 84 and Resident 96 at risk for adverse consequences (unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of medication) due to unnecessary prolonged use of psychotropic medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 96's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses including respiratory failure ( serious condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 46's food and cultural preferences were honored. This failure resulted in weight loss due to inadequate consumed calories for residents who did not receive the food items of their choices and preference. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including respiratory failure (a serious condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or remove enough carbon dioxide). During a review of Resident 46's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/11/2029, the H&P indicated Resident 46 had diagnoses of but not limited to craniotomy (a surgical procedure that involves removing a piece of the skull to access the brain), cerebrovascular accident (stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) with hemiplegia (paralysis of one half of the body) and Moyamoya disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for three of 10 residents (Resident 29, 62, and 86) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 29's water bag was labeled and dated. 2. Ensure Resident 62's tube feeding bottle was labeled and dated. 3. Ensure Resident 86's tube feeding bottle was dated. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for Residents 29, 62, and 86. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 29's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 29 was re-admitted to the facility 11/1/2024. During a review of Resident 29's History and Physical (H&P), the H&P indicated Resident 29 was admitted with diagnoses of ruptured cerebral aneurysm (a weak spot in a blood vessel in the brain, like a tiny balloon, has burst open, causing bleeding in the surrounding brain tissue) and gastroparesis (stomach muscles are weakened or impaired, causing food to remain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address and monitor the use of antibiotic on two of five sampled residents (Resident 41 and Resident 98) when residents' conditions or symptoms did not meet McGeer criteria(a set of criteria used in long term care facilities to determine if signs and symptoms constitute a true infection). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 41 and Resident 98 developing resistance (antibiotic will not be effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate use of antibiotic. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 98's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] facility with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (condition when the lungs are not able to effectively take in oxygen and remove carbon dioxide from the blood). During a review of Resident 98's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/26/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 98 had diagnoses of but not limited to traumatic brain injury (TBI-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in a sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness (also called food poisoning caused by eating contaminated food or eating food not kept at appropriate temperatures) by failing to: 1. Label multiple canned foods, meat products, and vegetables with opened date and received date. 2.Ensure [NAME] 2 did not repeatedly placed the plastic serving spoon in the soiled area and used it to transfer food to the plate. These deficient practices had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization for residents residing in the facility. Findings: During a facility kitchen tour observation on 12/11/2023 at 9:35 a.m., observed multiple canned foods with no received date, observed multiple seasoning goods that were opened but not labelled with open date. During an interview on 12/11/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with the Dietary Director, stated that all canned foods, meat products, and vegetables delivered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident standardized assessment and care screening tool) assessment was transmitted within 14 days after completion for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice resulted in late data transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding Resident's 3 medical status while in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including respiratory failure (a condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide) and tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea [windpipe] to allow air to fill the lungs). During a review of Resident 3's quarterly Assessment Reference Date (ARD [the end date of the observation period and provides a common reference point for all team members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensed nurses failed to follow the facility policy and procedure (P&P) for initiation and maintenance of intravenous therapy ([IV] a way to give fluids, medicine, nutrition, or blood directly into the blood stream through a vein) for three of three residents (Residents 92, 65 and 49) as evidenced by: 1.Failing to label and date a peripheral intravenous catheter ([PIV] a short catheter inserted through a peripheral vein for the administration of solution or medication) site for Resident 65. 2.Failing to label and date extension tubing (tubing that is connected to the intravenous catheter upon insertion) to administer solution or medication directly into the resident vein. 3.Failing to obtain a physician order (PO) to insert a PIV in Residents 49 left foot. These deficient practices have the potential to result in harm and lead to development of infection, infiltration (accidental leakage of non-vesicant solutions out of the vein into the surrounding tissue)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of bed rails (are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) for six of seven sampled residents (Resident 39,45,20,11,68 and 27), as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure by failing to: 1. Assess and complete the Bed Rail Use and Entrapment (an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail) Risk Assessment for Resident 39,45,20,11,68 and 27 per facility's policy and procedure (P&P). 2. Implement a care plan for the use of bed rails. These deficient practices had the potential to physical harm from possible entrapment (when a person is trapped by the bed rail in a position they cannot move from) from the use of bed rails for Resident 39,45,20,11,68 and 27. During an observation on 12/11/2023 at 11:55 a.m. at Resident 39's bedside, Resident 39 was observed non-verbal with a soft wrist restraint on the right wrist, a soft mitten restraint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] designated to bring about constant and measurable improvement in the services provided at the facility for continual improvement of quality care) committee failed to: 1.Reach QAPI goal of 100% for Restraint Reason Justification for the third quarter 2023 (July, August, and September). 2.Reach QAPI goal of 100% for Restraint Assessment for the third quarter 2023 (July, August, and September). 3.Reach QAPI goal of 100% for Restraint Documentation for the third quarter 2023 (July, August, and September). 4.Reach QAPI goal of 100% for Restraint Documentation for the third quarter 2023 (July, August, and September). These deficient practices placed for 12 residents out 95 who were on physical restraints (devices that limit a patient's movement) at risk for impaired blood circulation with possible formation of venous stasis ulcers (medical condition characterized by impaired blood flow in the veins), skin injuries including pressure ulcer (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures by failing to: 1.Practice hand hygiene after removal and before putting on a new pair of gloves during medication pass observation. 2.Clean blood pressure machine ( BP- measurement of the force of blood that is flowing through the blood vessels) after using on Resident 30. 3. Dispose used gown to the designated trash bin inside the resident's room. 4.Ensure doffed off (to remove or take off) used personal protective equipment ([PPE] protective clothing, garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer or the resident from infections) such as gloves and gown while walking in the hallway. These failures had a potential to result in cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and place residents at risk for spread of infection. Findings: 1.During a medication pass observation on 12/14/2023, at 10:05 a.m. with Licensed Vocational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach on one of six sampled residents ( Resident 75). This failure had the potential to result in a delay of treatment for Resident 75 pain on the right side of her body and inability for Resident 75 to obtain necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 75's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (life threatening complication of an infection), functional quadriplegia ( complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty from other medical condition), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ( [ALS] nervous disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord causing loss of muscle control) diabetes, and acute on chronic respiratory failure ( inability of lungs to meet oxygen needs of the body). During a review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] standardized assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six sample residents (Resident 11 and Resident 20) received the care and services necessary to prevent complications while managing their gastrostomy tube ([G-tube] an artificial opening into the stomach to deliver medication, nutrition, and hydration) while providing care by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 11's G- tube was assessed for feeding tolerance during medication pass observation. 2.Ensure Resident 20's tube feeding ( liquid form of food that is delivered through the body through a flexible tube called gastrostomy tube) was labeled and dated appropriately according to the facility's Policy & Procedure (P&P). These deficient practices had the potential to cause Resident 11 to have intolerance to the feeding which could have caused diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and aspiration (inhalation of foreign materials) which could lead to pneumonia (a lung infection), and had the potential to result in Resident 20 at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 11) had an adequate amount of oxygen in the portable oxygen tank ( light, small tank that allow resident to receive supplemental oxygen ) while attending an activity and while in the patio. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 11's breathing and could cause desaturation (low blood oxygen concentration) from not receiving adequate amount of oxygen. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of hemorrhagic stroke (blood vessels rupture in or near the brain which can cause permanent damage to the brain), tracheostomy (opening in the windpipe that provides an alternative airway for breathing), chronic respiratory failure( occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood which makes it difficult to breathe), ileostomy (opening in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 49) received care and services for the provision of parenteral fluids (medication administered in a manner other than the digestive system) consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to : 1. Ensure staff followed the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Comprehensive Vascular Access Management prior to the insertion of a peripheral intravenous catheter ([IV] a line inserted into the skin used to give fluids and medications) into Resident 49's left foot. 2. Ensure nursing staff assessed and monitored Resident 49's IV site appropriately during the administration of medication through his left foot IV. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 49 having an IV inserted into his left foot without a physician's order (a formal request for a specific action to be carried out by the medical staff, such as administering a medication, conducting a diagnostic test, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater during the medication pass observation by failing to administer two medications on one of four sampled residents (Resident 30) as ordered by the physician. 2.Check or verify name and date of birth of Resident 30's with his identification band ([ID] an armband that ensures accurate identification and includes the name and date of birth of a resident) before administering medications. These failures resulted to a medication error of 8 percent (%) out of 25 opportunities and had the potential to give medications to a wrong resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen to meet body's demands), seizure(uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of the two sampled patients (Patient 1), Patient 1's medications was administered by a licensed personnel or the patient's family member who had received educational training on the administration of Venelex ointment (a topical medication use in the management of wound) and Triad cream (a topical medication use in the management of wound) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication error and for Patient 1's wound to have an ineffective treatment and delayed healing of the wound. Findings: During a review of Patient 1's PCP (primary care provider) Meeting Progress Note, dated 10/19/2023, the progress note indicated Patient 1's assessment and plan included chronic respiratory failure (a condition where there's not enough oxygen in the body). In addition, the note indicated Patient 1 had a moisture-associated dermatitis to the buttocks and the plan was to treat with topical care and nutritional support. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$11,170 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $11,170 — penalty dated 2023-12-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/26/2007 |
| PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2016 |
| PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/30/2008 |
| PROVIDENCE ST. JOSEPH HEALTH | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2016 |
| BLAIR, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2016 |
| BUCK, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2025 |
| CRAWFORD, ISIAAH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2012 |
| DUFAULT, KARIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2025 |
| HEJNA, DIANE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2016 |
| HUGHES, PHYLLIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2014 |
| KINGSTON, MARY BETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2022 |
| LYONS, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2016 |
| MARKHAM, DONNA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| MURPHY, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2020 |
| O'QUINN, MARVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| RIOJAS, ROGELIO | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2025 |
| SORENSON, CHARLES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2019 |
| SPRUNK, ERIC | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2022 |
| ANDERSON, DONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/20/2016 |
| ELMOUCHI, DARRYL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| HOFFMAN, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2020 |
| MARTIN, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/13/2023 |
| NEWSOM, ANNA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/13/2022 |
| GHATAN, BIJAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2014 |
| KELL, JASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2026 |
| RICKS, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/05/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 58 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555848. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.