No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Providence Mount St Vincent

4831 35th Avenue Southwest, Seattle, WA 98126 · Non profit - Corporation · 215 certified beds · (206) 937-3700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (206) 937-3700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 actual-harm citations$129,568 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $129,568 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-10)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
4755 Fauntleroy Way SW Ste 110 · (206) 923-3760 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4706 42nd Ave SW · (206) 932-8044 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4755 Fauntleroy Way SW Ste 190 · (206) 338-5060 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4622 35th Ave SW · (206) 684-4075 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4742 42nd Ave SW · (206) 890-8110

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.2%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.3%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.2%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.4%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%2.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.4%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.3%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.1%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.2%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%19.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.5%13.4%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.271.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.871.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 268 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.7%CMS range 54.8–66.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.1%CMS range 6.0–10.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified89.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.2–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.93
RN hoursweekends
51.5%
Total nursing turnover
30.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 215 beds and averages 185.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.35 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-13)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

65 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 8 of 12 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8) reviewed for abuse. Resident 1 experienced physical harm when Staff D (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) grabbed the resident's arms which left fingerprint bruises and a nail inflicted skin tear;after the incident as demonstrated by mood changes including frequent crying, increased behaviors of distress, multiple days of refused care and medications, and repetitive verbalized statements of fear of being physically hurt. These failures placed residents at risk of verbal, physical, mental, psychological abuse, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition and Prevention policy revised on 01/2024 showed all residents had the right to be free from mistreatment including physical, mental, and verbal abuse. The facility had processes and measures in place to prevent, investigate, and act…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-02-07 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for hospitalization to return to the facility after a facility-initiated transfer to the emergency room (ER). Resident 1 experienced psychological harm when they experienced a two-week long hospitalization delay while another nursing facility could be arranged for discharge, anxiety related to being placed in an unfamiliar environment, expressions of fear of homelessness and hopelessness when the facility failed to permit the Resident 1 to return to the facility and resume residency when they were medically cleared by the hospital to discharge. Findings included . Review of the 10/22/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed Resident 1 had a chronic, progressive neurological disease, was cognitively intact, had a feeding tube in their abdomen for nutrition, required assistance from staff for all personal care and mobility. Review of a facility nurse progress note, dated 01/15/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 5 sample residents (Residents 110) reviewed for abuse. Resident 110 experienced psychological harm when they were touched inappropriately without consent by a staff member and continued to ruminate on the incident. This failure placed other residents at risk of sexual, verbal, and mental abuse, psychological harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's Abuse Prohibition and Prevention policy dated 01/2024, all residents receiving care and services at the facility had the right to be free from mistreatment including sexual, physical, mental, and verbal abuse. The policy defined sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual contact of any kind. The policy showed when a resident made an abuse allegation against a caregiver, that caregiver would be placed on administrative leave until the conclusion of the investigation. The policy showed if the allegation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an environment free of avoidable accidents/injuries for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. The failure to ensure nursing staff followed the resident care plan (CP) and facility policy while transferring Resident 1 using a mechanical lift resulted in harm when the resident was transferred by one staff person instead of two staff persons, obtained a laceration on the right leg, and was hospitalized for five days. This failure placed residents requiring a mechanical lift transfer at risk for injury, hospitalization, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy Mechanical Lift Use reviewed 04/2023 showed residents transferred using a mechanical lift required two staff to operate the lift to ensure resident safety and prevent injuries. One staff will stabilize the resident while a second staff guides the resident to the transfer destination, gently lowering the resident into a resting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 10 residents (Residents 94, 24 & 3) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 47) reviewed for accidents were assessed for the ability to smoke safely and to address storage of smoking materials (Residents 94 & 24), were provided an assistive device to prevent accidents (Resident 3), and were provided an environment free of unsecured chemicals (Resident 47). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of unsecured chemicals and sharps in shower rooms for 2 of 10 units (4 South & 5 North) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for burns, accidental removal of implanted devices, exposure to chemicals and sharps, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's Resident Safety, Accident Prevention, and Supervision policy, revised 04/2025, showed the facility was committed to providing a resident environment that was as free from accident hazards as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and expired medical supplies were discarded timely for 2 of 5 medication storage rooms (Saint [NAME] Residence -SJR Medication Storage Room & 2 North Medication Storage Room) and 2 of 6 medication carts (4 South Medication Cart & 5 North Medication Cart B) reviewed for medication storage, and failed to ensure medications were properly secured in 4 of 10 units (4 South, 3 South, 5 Central, and 2 North) reviewed for medications at the bedside. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving incorrect or expired medications, ineffective treatment, and diminished quality of life.<Facility Policy>According to the facility's Medication Administration and Storage policy revised 04/2025, medications must be stored, secured, and managed in a manner that ensure residents safety and decreases the risk of medication error; medication practices must maintain medication integrity and prevent unsafe practices. For…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 main kitchen and ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner and following residents' dietary needs in 1 of 6 neighborhood kitchens (Saint [NAME] Residence/SJR). The failure to cover refrigerated and frozen food, ensure staff secured their hair and performed hand hygiene, placed residents at risk for cross-contamination, foodborne illness and the spread of infection. Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 11/2023 Food Storage policy, staff would ensure all containers had tight fitting covers and were clearly labeled and dated to prevent contamination.According to the facility's revised 04/2024 Hand Hygiene policy, staff would perform hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection in all areas of the facility including during meals. <Main Kitchen> <Food Storage> During an observation of the main kitchen refrigerator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: ensure Transmission Based Precautions (TBP - a set of infection control practices used to prevent the spread of infectious agents in addition to standard precautions) were implemented or followed for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 212 & 33) and 3 supplemental residents (Residents 12, 156, & 157) reviewed for TBP and/or exposed to respiratory symptoms; failed to ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - disposable barriers such as gloves and gowns used to prevent exposure to infectious materials) for 1 of 2 residents (Residents 201) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug resistant organisms); ensure staff used appropriate Hand Hygiene (HH) during resident care for 1 resident (Resident 93) who was observed for care; and failed to ensure proper storage of resident hygiene items for 2 of 14 resident rooms (Rooms 220 & 221) on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided care and services in a dignified manner for 2 (Residents 202 & 3) of 36 sample residents and 2 supplemental residents. The failure to: ensure catheter bags (bags that collect urine from tubing placed in the body to assist with urinary drainage) were covered to obscure their contents (Resident 202 & 3) and ensure 1 staff (Staff D - Licensed Practical Nurse) sat when providing feeding assistance to residents, placed residents at risk for undignified care and a diminished sense of self-worth.<Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised April 2025 Standards of Care policy, staff would ensure urinary catheters were covered to promote residents' privacy and dignity.According to the facility's revised January 2026 Resident Rights policy, staff would promote dignity, individuality, independence, and quality of life by minimizing institutional characteristics.<Resident 202> According to the 04/10/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure Advanced Directives (AD) were in place for 3 (Residents 188, 189, & 7) of 8 residents reviewed for ADs. This failure placed residents at risk of losing their right to have their stated preferences/decisions honored regarding medical treatment and end-of-life care.Findings included.<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's 04/2025 revised Advanced Directives policy showed facility staff would determine on admission whether the resident had an AD and if not, determine if the resident wished to formulate an AD. The policy showed staff would obtain a copy of the resident's AD and maintain the copy for all staff members to access in the resident's record.<Resident 189> According to the 01/23/2026 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 189 had intact cognition and diagnoses including heart failure, difficulty speaking following a brain bleed, and weakness to one side of their body. In an interview on 04/07/2026 at 8:58 AM, Resident 189 stated their sister used to be their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medication regimens were free of chemical restraints for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Staff failure to ensure appropriate indication for use, monitor residents for target behaviors, provide nonpharmacological interventions, and obtain consent for psychotropic medications placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and other negative health outcomes.Findings included .<Policy>According to the facility's 01/2025 Psychotropic Medication (a medication that affects mental processes and behavior) Management policy the facility would utilize behavioral and non-pharmacological approaches to minimize the need for psychotropic medications. This policy showed psychotropic medications would be considered when non-pharmacological approaches were attempted but did not relieve the resident of their medical symptoms. The policy showed prior to initiating the use of psychotropic medication, the staff and the physician would review non-pharmacological alternatives,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate, notify provider of changes in condition, implement appropriate fall interventions, and rule out abuse/neglect for 2 of 11 sampled residents (Resident 3 & 27) reviewed for investigations. The failure to conduct thorough investigations left residents at risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect, recurrence of events, and a decreased quality of life.<Policy>According to the facility's 10/2025 Fall Prevention and Response policy the facility would investigate falls, including interviewing residents, staff, and others about the nature of the falls, and assess the resident for injuries sustained in the event. The policy stated the facility would initiate neurological assessments for residents who sustain an unwitnessed fall to check for potential injury and report to the physician for further assessment and treatment as needed.<Resident 3>According to the 12/07/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) Resident 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) level 2 referrals were followed up on timely for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 16) whose PASRRs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs.Findings included.<Facility Policy>According to the facility's Mood and Behavior Program policy, revised 03/2026, the facility would follow guidance as issued by the State-designated PASRR authority.<Resident 16>According to the 12/05/2025 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 16 had diagnoses including a progressive, irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroyed memory, thinking skills, and the ability to perform simple tasks, anxiety, and depression. The MDS showed Resident 16 received an antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medication during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were updated and/or revised as needed for 2 of 35 sample residents (Residents 82 & 18) reviewed, and failed to conduct care conferences for residents with their resident representative and the applicable Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) members for 2 of 7 residents (Resident 58 and 214) reviewed for care planning. Failure to ensure CPs were updated and to offer care conferences to reflect current care needs left residents at risk for unmet care needs, delay in treatments, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's Resident Care Plan Reviews and Care Conferences policy, revised 01/2025, the facility conducted regular CP reviews and care conferences to ensure each resident's needs were met in a timely and effective manner, and were held according to regulatory requirements and as needed, such as with changes of condition or when significant changes to care goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: Ensure Physician's Orders (POs) were clarified and followed, to have parameters for pain medications, and medications given within ordered parameters for 2 of 6 sample residents (Residents 7 & 17), Staff failed to sign for narcotics from the narcotic ledger when given, and count the narcotics effectively each shift for 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed (Four south unit). These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, unmet care needs, narcotic diversion, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included .<Policy>According to the facility's 02/2026 Pain Management policy the facility would use adequate doses of as needed medications to achieve the residents desired level of pain relief.According to the facility's 02/2025 Bowel Care policy the facility would monitor resident bowel movements and if no bowel movement after 6 shifts staff were to follow the physician ordered bowel care protocol and administer stool softeners…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), related to cleanliness and grooming for 3 of 7 sample residents (Residents 39, 189, & 156) reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with nail care (Resident 39 and 189), and bathing (Resident 156) placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, embarrassment and diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) policy, revised 01/2025, the facility provided residents with care and services for ADLs, including bathing and grooming. <Resident 39> According to a 01/29/2026 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool), Resident 39 had no memory impairment, had clear speech, and was able to make independent daily decisions. This MDS showed Resident 39 required maximal assistance from staff for transfers, personal hygiene, and bathing, and had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility: Failed to ensure residents' skin was assessed, documented, monitored, and treated as required for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 188 & 214) reviewed for non-pressure skin. These failures placed all residents at risk for delay in treatment, worsening of condition, and decreased quality of life. Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Skin Integrity Monitoring- Non-Pressure Related Conditions, dated 04/2024, the facility would ensure skin conditions would be assessed and issues would be documented in the resident's records to include location, description, and interventions. The policy showed follow up monitoring would occur to evaluate progression or resolution of the skin condition.<Resident 188> According to the 02/23/2026 5 Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 188 did not have cognitive impairment, was understood, and able to understand others in conversation. This assessment showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents consistent with professional standards of practice including the failure to assess pain medication effectiveness for as needed (PRN) pain medications and failure to assess residents pain utilizing pain assessments and pain scales for 2 of 6 residents (Resident 82 & 52 ) reviewed for pain management. These failures placed residents at risk for experiencing untreated pain, possible side effects, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included <Facility Policy>According to the facility's Pain Management policy, revised 02/2026, the facility assessed residents who had pain using pain assessment tools, including a numeric pain rating scale (a pain severity scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable) or a Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (a pain assessment tool using six faces ranging from smiling to crying), to ensure consistent and accurate evaluation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Failure of 1 of 5 nurses (Staff W - Long Term Care Registered Nurse) to properly administer 2 of 29 medications for 1 (Resident 56) of 6 residents observed during medication pass, resulted in a medication error rate of 6.9%. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and/or not receiving prescribed medications as ordered.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, revised 04/2025, showed the facility staff administering the medication should be sure to review elements of the medication order including verifying the resident name, name of medication, strength, dosage, time, and route.<Staff W>Observation on 04/08/2026 at 9:04 AM showed Staff W preparing to administer morning medications to Resident 56. Staff W measured 25 milliliters (ml) of a liquid supplement medication into a medication cup and prepared prescription eye drops for Resident 56. Staff W was ready to administer the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided as assessed to be required for 3 of 5 sample residents (Residents 188, 189, & 156) reviewed for rehabilitation with skilled therapy services. This failure prevented residents from attaining, maintaining, or restoring their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psycho-social well-being.Findings included . <Resident 188> According to the 02/23/2026 5 Day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 188 did not have cognitive impairment, was understood, and able to understand others in conversation. The assessment showed Resident 188 had diagnoses of kidney stones and bladder infection and required assistance from staff with daily needs including personal hygiene. Review of the facility Census record showed Resident 188 was hospitalized on [DATE] for scheduled procedure to remove kidney stones and came back to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurses aides completed required annual training for 2 of 5 nurses aides (Staff J, Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA, and Staff K, CNA) reviewed for annual training. The failure to ensure CNAs completed 12 hours of annual training placed residents at risk for care deficits and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According the facility's 06/2025 Mandatory Education/Training Requirements policy, the facility would establish a system to ensure all caregivers completed mandatory education and training in accordance with certification and regulatory requirements. The policy showed CNAs must complete a minimum of 12 hours training annually. Review of Staff J's annual training documentation from their last full year of employment from 9/9/2024 through 09/09/2025 showed Staff J completed 4.3 hours of education/training. Staff J did not meet the 12 hour requirement. In an interview on 04/13/2026 at 11:47 AM, Staff B (Director of Nursing) stated the facility had difficulty encouraging CNAs to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to implement and/or follow Transmission Based Precaution (TBP) protocol for 4 of 16 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, & 4) reviewed for infection control related to COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease of 2019, an infectious respiratory disease caused by a virus). This failure placed residents at risk of infection and related complications.<Facility Policy>The facility's 08/2024 Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) policy showed the facility would implement Aerosol Contact Precautions (ACP) for residents with confirmed or suspected infections from COVID-19, which spreads through airborne and droplet routes through coughing, sneezing, talking, and through the provision of care. The TBP policy showed the facility would place a sign on the resident's door to inform staff and visitors of the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to put on and actions to take before entering the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The failure to identify resident injuries as potential abuse, placed residents at risk for further abuse, injuries, and diminished quality of life. Findings included Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition and Prevention policy dated 01/2024 showed all residents had the right to be free from mistreatment including sexual, physical, mental, and verbal abuse. The facility would have processes and measures in place to prevent, investigate, and act on all allegations of abuse. The policy showed the prevention of further abuse would occur by taking measures to protect the alleged victim, as well as other residents during the investigation by placing the identified staff on suspension during the investigation. The alleged victims would be monitored and protected from psychological harm during and after the investigation. In a phone interview on 05/27/2025 at 10:25 AM, Staff A (Administrator) stated during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify potential abuse, initiate an investigation to rule out abuse, and implement interventions to prevent ongoing abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed. The failure to investigate an injury of unknown origin, a sign of potential abuse, prevented the facility from protecting other residents from abuse, neglect, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes The Purple Book, dated October 2015, showed injuries of unknown source must be thoroughly investigated to determine what occurred and make necessary provisions to resident care to prevent reoccurrence. The first phase of the investigation must occur within the first 24 hours of the knowledge of the incident. If the reasonable cause of the injury is not determined, a second phase must follow to end with the identification of who was involved, and what, where, why and how the incident happened. Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition and Prevention policy revised on 01/2024 showed staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from hazards for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 2 and 3) reviewed for accidents. The failure of staff to intervene when Resident 2 was using cannabis (an illegal drug that causes an altered mental status) through a vape pen (a device that heats the drug to a consistency to inhale through the lungs) and allowed secondary exposure of cannabis to the roommate, staff, and placed residents at risk of harm from fire, injury, exposure to an illegal drug, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 10/18/2024 Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed Resident 2 was cognitively intact and rarely needed assistance with health literacy. The MDS showed Resident 2 had multiple medically complex conditions including pain and limited mobility. The MDS showed Resident 2 was assessed to require maximum assistance from staff for personal care and mobility. Review of the 10/11/2024 admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food and drinks served to residents were prepared and distributed under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 facility kitchens, and 2 of 6 unit kitchenettes. The failure to maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary manner, complete Hand Hygiene (HH - washing or sanitizing hands) as required, sanitize kitchen thermometers appropriately, and ensure Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA's) hair was secured when preparing meals in unit kitchenettes placed residents at risk for contaminated/spoiled food, foodborne illness, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 04/2023 Neighborhood Food Service policy, staff must wash their hands prior to food preparation. The policy showed hair must be restrained. <Facility Main Kitchen - Equipment> Observation on 01/02/2025 of the facility's main kitchen from 8:45 AM through 8:50 AM showed: an uncovered meat slicer with nothing preventing dust or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted resident rights and dignity for 10 (Residents 56, 170, 69, 18, 15, 92, 85, 22, 164, & 70) of 35 sample residents. The failure to provide dignity during dining services including administration of medications in the dining room (Residents 56, 170, 69, 18, 15, 92 & 300 South Dining Room), provide privacy (Residents 85 & 22), and provide care in a dignified manner (Resident 70 & 164) placed residents at risk for a diminished sense of self-worth and well-being. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the 08/2017 Facility admission Agreement showed residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity. According to the 11/2023 revised . Standards of Care facility policy, staff would close a resident's door or curtain for privacy when providing care. <Dining Services> <Resident 56> Observations of meal services in the dining room on 01/07/2025 at 8:36 AM showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow 3 (Resident 22, 142, & 170) of 4 residents reviewed for choices, the right to make choices regarding important daily routines and health care, including accommodating preferences for the frequency and/or type of bathing, and 1 supplementary resident (Resident 100). The facility's failure to accommodate resident choice placed these residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 22> According to a 12/12/2024 Quarterly MDS, Resident 22 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including stroke, had clear speech, was able to understand, and be understood by others. This MDS showed it was very important to Resident 22 to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath, was dependent on staff for bathing, and had no rejection of care. In an interview on 01/06/2025 at 10:03 AM, Resident 22 indicated they could not remember the last time they had a shower and stated, bathing is not as often as it used to be. Resident 22 stated they preferred bathing more often.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate reportable incidents for 2 of 5 sample residents (Residents 110 & 95) reviewed for abuse, and one supplemental resident (Resident 124). The failure to thoroughly investigate allegation of abuse placed residents at risk of verbal and mental abuse, psychosocial harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's Abuse Prohibition and Prevention policy dated 01/2024, defined sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual contact of any kind. The policy showed when a resident made an allegation of suspected or alleged abuse, a thorough investigation would be completed. The policy showed a thorough investigation would include interviews with any witnesses and document details of the alleged event. The policy showed the facility would document the details of the occurrence in the record of all affected residents, including immediate interventions. <Resident 110> According to the admission Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care conferences as required for 2 (Residents 427 & 28) of 35 sample residents whose Care Plans (CPs) were reviewed, and failed to ensure CPs were updated as needed to reflect changes in resident's care needs for 4 (Residents 22, 142, 170, & 7) of 35 sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. The failure to provide care conferences and to update CPs with changes in residents' health status placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, unnecessary care, and frustration. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Resident Care Plan Reviews and Care Conferences, revised 04/2023, showed the facility would hold care conferences in accordance with regulatory requirements and as needed. <Care Conference> <Resident 427> According to 01/01/2025 admission Minimum data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 427 admitted to the facility on [DATE] without memory impairment. In an interview on 01/02/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), related to cleanliness and grooming for 8 of 35 residents (Resident 14, 22, 170, 93, 112, 120, 126, & 82) reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with nail care, dentures, dressing, shaving, and bathing placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, long facial hair, embarrassment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Nail Care> <Resident 14> According to the 12/19/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 14 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with weakness on the left side of their body. The assessment showed Resident 14 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, showers, and toileting needs. Observations on 01/03/2025 at 11:31 AM and on 01/06/2025 at 8:23 AM showed Resident 14 was in bed. Resident 14 had long fingernails with black debris under their fingernails.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 110, 170, & 171) reviewed for activities. Failure to provide meaningful activities left residents at risk for boredom, frustration, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 07/2024 Activities policy, each resident should be provided the opportunity to participate in activities that reflected their interests and lifestyle. The policy showed the activities offered should help meet residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. <Resident 110> According to the 11/14/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 110 had intact memory, and sometimes experienced social isolation. The MDS showed it was extremely important to Resident 110 to get outside when the weather was suitable. The MDS showed all activity preferences were extremely important for Resident 110,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards for 4 of 9 (2 North, 4 South, St Joseph's Residence (SJR), & 5 North) units reviewed. The failure to ensure sharps (syringe needles, razors etc.) and chemicals were stored safely placed residents at risk for injury, unsafe chemicals, and accident hazards. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the revised 01/2025 Cleaning and Disinfection of Environment Surfaces policy, all chemicals would remain out of reach of residents and stored behind locked doors to ensure safety. <2 North Unit> Observation on 01/02/2025 at 8:43 AM showed the clean utility room on the 2 North unit was unlocked. Eight blood collection kits with needles were observed uncontained on a shelf at waist height. A towel warmer device was present and in use in the utility room. The towel warmer was easily opened and not secured/locked. In an interview on 01/02/2025 at 9:44 AM, Staff V (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) confirmed the eight blood collection kits in the unlocked utility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services, to assure resident safety, and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident according to resident assessments and plans of care for 4 of 4 facility staff (Staff Q - Certified Nursing Assistant), Staff W Registered Nurse (RN), Staff X - (RN), and Staff Y - (RN)) randomly selected and reviewed for competency. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proficiency of nursing staff. The failure of nursing and nurse aide staff, to demonstrate a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors that nurses need to perform work roles successfully, resulted in deficiencies related to the competency of nursing staff. Findings included . The 2024 Facility Assessment review date 10/14/2024 showed training, education and competencies of nurses and nurse aides were necessary to provide support and care to the residents of the facility. The Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to implement and/or follow isolation precautions for 3 of 7 residents (Resident 14, 85, and 15) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) , and failed to follow Transmission Based Precaution (TBP) for 1 of 2 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for TBP. These failures placed the residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 08/2024 Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) policy showed the facility used different kinds of precautions to protect residents and staff from different kinds of communicable diseases. The policy showed the appropriate precautions would be implemented when residents were diagnosed with or suspected to have infections or communicable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and resolve grievances for 1 (Resident 70) of 1 residents reviewed for grievances. This failure placed residents at risk for reoccurrence of issues and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 09/2024 revised Resident Grievance Policy, the facility would promote resident autonomy and self-directed care and services. The policy showed the facility would seek to respond to resident concerns with respect to care and treatment, the behavior of staff and other residents. Residents had the right to file grievances verbally or in writing and receive a written decision regarding their grievance. The policy showed facility staff would acknowledge grievances received verbally and in writing and provide assurance there would be follow up. <Resident 70> According to the 10/11/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 70 was understood and could understand others during conversation. This MDS showed Resident 70 did not have impaired memory or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively implement policies addressing the prohibition and prevention of abuse for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 110 and 95) reviewed for abuse and one supplemental resident (Resident 124). The failure to implement abuse prohibition and prevention policies placed residents at risk for verbal and mental abuse, psychosocial harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 01//2024 Abuse Prohibition and Prevention policy showed all residents receiving care and services at the facility had the right to be free from mistreatment including sexual, physical, mental, and verbal abuse. The policy defined sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual contact of any kind. The policy showed if the allegation was substantiated appropriate corrective action would be taken. The policy showed all suspected and alleged violations would immediately be reported to all required agencies. The policy showed when a resident made an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure local Law Enforcement (LE) was notified for reasonable suspicion of a crime for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 110) reviewed for abuse. The failure to notify LE after substantiating an allegation of inappropriate touch/abuse placed residents at risk for verbal and mental abuse, psychosocial harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings Included . According to Appendix D of Washington State's Department of Social & Health Services Purple Book (Nursing Home Guidelines on prevention and protection, incident identification, investigation, and reporting), incidents involving staff-to-resident concerns must be reported to LE. Appendix D showed that circumstances where findings were made against licensed, certified, or registered health care workers the State Department of Health (DOH) must be notified. <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 01/2024 Abuse Prohibition and Prevention policy, all suspected and alleged violations would immediately be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents/representatives received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 14 and 120) reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure written notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the reasons for the discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of a 02/2022 facility's Bed Hold and Return to Facility policy, showed for the planned transfers, the facility would provide the transfer/discharge information before or at the time of the transfer. The policy showed for emergency transfers, the facility would contact residents or representatives to offer information within 24 hours. <Resident 14> Review of Resident 14's 11/14/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative with a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 2 of 7 sample residents (Resident 14 & 120) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized that was necessary for decision-making. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of a 02/2022 facility's Bed Hold and Return to Facility policy, showed facility would provide residents and their representatives bed hold and return information at admission and before a hospital transfer or therapeutic leave. For the planned transfers, the facility would provide the bed hold information before or at the time of the transfer. The policy showed for emergency transfers, the facility would contact residents or representatives to offer bed hold within 24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 170) of 35 residents Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) were completed accurately to reflect the resident's condition. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs. Findings included . <Resident 170> According to a 12/11/2024 admission MDS, Resident 170 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including cancer. This MDS indicated Resident 170 did not have a life expectancy of less than six months and was not on hospice. Review of Resident 170's physician orders showed the resident was receiving an antianxiety medication for anxiety as part of a hospice comfort kit. Observations on 01/07/2025 at 1:35 PM showed Resident 170's hard chart at the nurse's station had stickers on the front indicating the resident was on hospice services. According to a 12/06/2024 hospice election statement form, Resident 170 was started on hospice services on 12/06/2024. In an interview on 01/10/2025 at 2:31 PM, Staff SS (Care Manager - Registered Nurse) stated the completion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) for 2 (Residents 428 & 93) of 35 sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, inappropriate care, and frustration. Findings included . <Resident 428> According to a 12/30/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 428 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS showed Resident 428 was frequently incontinent of bowels. Review of Resident 428's 12/30/2024 9:10 AM Infection Prevention & Control progress note Resident 428 admitted on [DATE] and was on enteric precautions (infection control measure designed to prevent transmission of pathogens through the fecal-oral route) at the hospital for diarrhea their entire hospital stay. The note showed the hospital ruled out any infectious origin, but Resident 428 was still experiencing diarrhea since admission to the facility. In an interview on 01/03/2025 at 8:55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: physician's orders were followed for 2 (Resident 22 & 85) and medications were administered for 1 (Resident 28) of 35 sample residents reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, and adverse outcomes. Findings included . <Following Orders> <Resident 22> According to a 12/12/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 22 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including neurogenic bladder (a condition where the nerves that control the bladder are damaged) and required the use of an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to collect and drain urine). Observations on 01/06/2025 at 8:55 AM, and 01/07/2025 at 1:31 PM showed Resident 22 with a catheter bag hanging from the bottom of the bed frame. Review of Resident 22's physician orders showed a 12/21/2024 order to remove the indwelling catheter for a trial and to replace with a size 16 FR [French]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident 15) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU- injury to the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure), received necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Failure to implement wound prevention interventions, report on worsening conditions and to use appropriate hand hygiene practices and personal protective equipment (gloves, masks and gowns) when providing wound care and provide proper infection control practices, placed residents at risk for deterioration in skin condition(s) pressure ulcers and a diminished quality of life. <Facility Policy> Review of the revised 01/2023 Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment policy, showed the facility would evaluate the resident's clinical condition and pressure ulcer risk factors and implement interventions that were consistent with resident needs, goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents weights were accurately monitored for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 14) reviewed for nutrition. The failure to ensure resident weights were rechecked when appropriate and the physician notified as required placed residents at risk for weight loss, weight gain, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 10/2023 Weight and Nutrition Monitoring Policy, the facility would strive to prevent significant weight loss in residents. The policy showed changes in the residents' nutritional status and weight would be discussed routinely by clinical staff and the Registered Dietician (RD). <Resident 14> According to the 12/19/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 14 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including anemia and malnutrition. The MDS showed Resident 14 was dependent on staff for transfers, personal hygiene, showers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents consistent with professional standards of practice including the failure to complete a thorough pain assessment prior to as needed (PRN) pain medication administration and have pain medications readily available for 2 of 7 residents (Resident 120 & 28) reviewed for pain management. These failures placed residents at risk for experiencing untreated pain and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 120> According to a 09/25/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 120 had no cognitive impairment. The MDS showed Resident 120 had a diagnosis of chronic pain and received routine and PRN pain medications without any nonpharmacological pain interventions implemented. The MDS showed Resident 120 experienced pain more than five days during the assessment period and their pain occasionally affected their sleep and day to day activities. Review of a 09/27/2024 Altered Comfort related to Chronic Pain and Muscle Spasm Care Plan (CP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured for 1 of 7 units (300 S/Resident 89), and expired medications and biologicals were disposed of for 1 of 6 medication carts (5 South Medication Cart 1), and 4 of 4 medication rooms (5 North, 5 South, 4 South, and 3 South) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. These failures to ensure medication rooms and carts were secured and free from expired medications and ensure medications were not left unattended in common areas placed residents at risk for receiving the wrong medications, expired medications, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the 06/2022 revised Medication Storage and Disposal facility policy, facility would provide proper disposal of medications. <300 South/Resident 89> According to the 11/05/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 89 was assessed with severely impaired memory. The MDS showed Resident 89 had a chronic respiratory disease. Observation on 01/02/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to keep all protected health information in the residents' records confidential and out of view from unauthorized individuals on 1 of 7 (5 North) units reviewed. This failure placed all former and current residents at risk for a violation of their right to privacy. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the 08/2017 Facility admission Agreement showed residents had a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records. <5 North> Observation and interview on 01/06/2025 at 8:52 AM showed a paper copy of an interdisciplinary team progress note in the grievance file folder on the wall by the elevator on the fifth floor. Staff E (Resident Care Manager) stated the paper copy of the progress note should not be in the grievance wall folder as anyone had access to that file folder. Staff E stated it was important to maintain resident record confidentiality for resident rights. Observation and interview on 01/06/2025 at 10:41 AM showed a 5 North resident roster/report sheet lying on top of cart 1 in view for anyone to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure effective coordination of care between the facility and hospice staff, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 170) reviewed for hospice services. Additionally, the facility failed to update the resident's Care Plan (CP) to show which agency was responsible for the hospice care. These failures prevented implementation of a system by which consistent communication between the facility and hospice staff occurred, and placed residents at risk for not for receiving necessary care and services. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to facility's revised 04/2023 Hospice Coordination policy, the facility and hospice would: establish a regular communication schedule and determine the appropriate method(s) for communication .; exchange all relevant resident information, including the resident's CP .; would ensure their staff were knowledgeable about the communication protocols and were trained to effectively communicate with each other.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, & 4) reviewed for falls and safety. The failure to implement a system for the use of air mattresses with a pump to include an assessment of the type of air mattress, size of air mattress and air pump settings, review of risk factors and obtain informed consent from the resident and/or the Resident Representative (RR), provision of staff training, develop and implement the Care Plan (CP), provide ongoing monitoring of air mattress safety, function and pump settings, and re-assessment of the risk for use of the air mattress after a resident fall, placed 16 other residents using air mattresses at risk for potential negative outcomes including falls, injury, and death. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility policy Safe Use of Devices and Medical Equipment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their emergency preparedness plans and procedures for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for elopement (A situation in which a resident leaves the premises without the facility's knowledge and/or supervision). The failure to identify, evaluate, implement, monitor, and modify interventions to prevent elopement for the safety of residents leaving the facility unsupervised, placed Resident 1 and other residents at risk for avoidable accidents, injuries, diminished quality of life, and death. Findings included . The 10/2019 facility procedure Missing Resident Handbook showed when a resident could not be located, the facility staff would attempt to locate the resident. A search of all facility areas indoors and outdoors would be completed and the family or responsible party would be contacted. When the resident was not located within 10 minutes, the staff would call 911 (emergency services) to report a missing resident and request…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were completed, accurate and/or updated for accuracy for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 45, 111, and 94) reviewed for PASRR, and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 103). The failure to ensure PASRR screening was complete and accurate left residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the 02/2022 Mood and Behavior Program facility policy showed a resident's PASRR should be completed prior to admission to the facility. This policy showed the facility complete a resident's PASRR re-screen when their mental health diagnoses changed, or when there were increases in behavior. <Resident 45> According to the 08/09/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 45 was assessed with moderate memory/thinking impairment and had progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (Residents 45, 56 & 30) reviewed for nutrition and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 144) maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Failure to ensure resident weight changes were reported as required, weights were collected as ordered, and supplements were provided as ordered left residents at risk for avoidable weight loss, unwanted weight loss, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 10/2023 Nutrition policy, residents' nutritional status and weight would be regularly discussed by the Registered Dietician (RD) and clinical staff. The policy showed residents would be weighed weekly until their weight stabilized, and then monthly. The policy showed nurses should review weights daily, and the RD should monitor resident weights on a weekly basis. The policy showed the nurse manager or designee, and the RD would review long term care residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff completed hand hygiene, secured their hair, or covered ready to eat food during meal service on 5 of 7 kitchenettes (5 North, 5 South, 4 North, 3 South, & 4 South) reviewed for serving meals in a sanitary manner. This failure placed residents at risk of contracting an infectious disease, consuming food prepared in an unsanitary manner, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <5 North> Observation on 10/23/2023 at 11:46 AM showed Staff M (Kitchen Attendant) managing tray line. Staff M provided a plastic menu to the residents in the dining room. Staff M handed a menu to a resident, discussed the options, took the menu back, and placed it on the counter directly next to the tray line. The menu was not sanitized, and hand hygiene was not performed prior to preparing the next ready to eat meal. Additional observations of this process were made on this date at 12:18 PM, & 12:35 PM. Observation on 10/23/2023 at 11:46 AM showed Staff M preparing a resident's cup of tea. Staff M was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases including Covid-19 (a highly transmissible respiratory disease) and other infections. The failure to ensure staff applied/removed Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as required, clean shared resident equipment between uses, used a barrier between medications and potentially contaminated surfaces, and performed hand hygiene as required including before and after personal/incontinence care placed residents at risk for infection, disease, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 07/2022 Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) policy showed the facility used different kinds of precautions to protect residents and staff from different kinds of communicable diseases. The policy showed the appropriate precautions would be implemented when residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits associated with psychotropic medication therapy (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior), and obtain resident consent prior to implementing the proposed treatments/therapies for 2 of 5 (Residents 41 & 69) residents and 1 supplemental (Resident 141) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure of facility staff to inform residents of the risks associated with medications when obtaining consent for psychotropic medications detracted from the residents' ability to exercise their right to make an informed decision about proposed treatments. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 12/2021 Psychotropic Medication policy showed before being treated with a psychotropic medication the Unit Manager would review the psychotropic medication assessment with the resident or their responsible party before asking the resident or their responsible party to sign a Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent form. <Resident 69> According to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident falls were thoroughly investigated with root cause for the fall and new safety interventions identified for 2 (Residents 144, & 111) of 7 residents reviewed for falls. These failures left residents at risk for injury, further falls, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 08/2022 Fall Prevention policy, residents should be assessed for fall risk on admission and periodically. The policy showed individualized Care Plans (CP) would be developed with resident-specific interventions. The policy directed staff report to the State when/as required and to initiate an investigation and complete an Incident/Event report. The policy did not direct staff to identify a root cause or identify and implement new interventions to prevent recurrence. <Resident 144> According to the 8/30/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 144 had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 2 (Residents 30 & 74) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized . Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the revised February 2022 SNF [Skilled Nursing Facility] Bed Hold and Return to Facility facility policy, showed residents and their representatives would be provided with bed hold information and information on returning to the facility before a hospital transfer. For emergency transfers, the resident and/or representative would be contacted within 24 hours. This policy showed residents who were transferred to the hospital would be provided written information about the state's bed hold duration and payment amount.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were revised, updated, and maintained with measurable goals for 4 (Residents 41, 30, 94 & 109) of 32 residents whose CPs were reviewed. The facility staff failed to ensure the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s) in the development of CPs for 3 (Residents 9, 24, & 103) of 32 residents reviewed. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 04/2023 Resident [CP] Review and Annual Care Conferences policy, CPs would be reviewed on a quarterly basis. The policy showed residents and/or their representatives would be invited to an annual care conference to discuss treatment and approaches. The policy showed care conferences should be initiated by the primary nurse or designee. <Care Conferences> <Resident 9> According to the 07/24/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: Ensure Physician's Orders (POs) were followed for 7 (Resident 94, 41, 45, 120, 24, 56, & 82 ) of 32 sample residents; POs were clarified for 1 (Resident 111) of 32 sample residents; medications were not given outside ordered parameters for 1 (Resident 69) of 32 sample residents. These failures left residents at risk for unmet care needs, inappropriate treatment, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Following Physician Orders> <Resident 94> According to an 08/23/2023 Quarterly minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 94 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including a brain injury and dementia. This MDS showed Resident 94 required extensive physical assistance from staff for bed mobility and toilet use. Review of Resident 94's POs showed three 09/25/2021 bowel medication orders for constipation: one order for an oral laxative medication with directions to staff to administer if the resident had no bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement individualized activity plans and ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 402) reviewed for activities, and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 41). Failure to consistently implement meaningful individual activity plans left residents at risk for boredom, frustration, isolation, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Policy> Review of the 10/2023 Recreation Therapy Program facility policy showed a recreation therapy assessment would be completed upon admission. Preferred activities would be included on the Kardex (a tool to communicate care needs). <Resident 402> According to the 10/12/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 402 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS showed Resident 402 made their own decisions, and had complex medical diagnoses including cancer, blood clots, pneumonia, and depression. The MDS showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' skin was assessed on admission and as ordered, documented, monitored, and treated as required for 3 (Residents 300, 62, & 402) of 32 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin. These failures placed residents at risk for new or worsening skin impairment, discomfort, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 10/2023 Skin Assessment and Interventions to Maintain and Restore Skin Integrity, policy staff were to assess all skin surfaces and wounds on residents admitted or readmitted to the facility on the day of admission. Once a week, staff were to perform a total body skin check and complete the weekly skin check assessment describing the resident's skin condition. <Resident 300> According to the 10/17/2023 admission assessment, Resident 300 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of an irregular heart rhythm, high blood pressure and respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for and received necessary treatment, adaptive equipment, and services needed to maintain vision abilities for 2 of 4 (Residents 9 & 62) residents reviewed for vision. Failure to ensure residents received vision care they were assessed to require left residents at risk for worsening vision, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 9> According to the 07/24/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 9 was assessed to have impaired vision and did not use corrective lenses. The MDS showed Resident 9 was assessed to have a moderate memory/thinking impairment. The MDS showed Resident 9 used a wheelchair (WC) for mobility. The MDS showed Resident 9 had medically complex conditions including glaucoma. The MDS showed Resident 9 was totally dependent on the assistance of two or more staff to transfer from surface to surface (such as from bed to WC). The MDS showed it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were followed according to professional standards of practice for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 401, 94, & 109) reviewed for respiratory care, and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 14). The failure to follow Physicians Orders (POs) for respiratory care, routinely change oxygen tubing, and routinely cleaning the oxygen machine filter placed residents at risk for respiratory infections, unmet care needs, and related complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 10/2023 Oxygen (O2) Therapy policy, staff were to monitor residents receiving oxygen therapy for signs of respiratory distress or oxygen toxicity. Regular assessments were to be conducted to evaluate its necessity and effectiveness. The flow rate was to be adjusted based on assessment findings communicated to the provider. <Resident 401> According to the 10/10/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 94, & 111) of 5 residents whose medication regimens were reviewed, were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications. This failure left residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications, adverse side effects, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 94> According to an 08/23/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 94 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including a brain injury, dementia, and a psychotic disorder and required the use of an antipsychotic medication during the assessment period. Review of a revised 05/24/2023 High-Risk Drug Use Care Plan (CP) showed staff identified a goal that Resident 94 would have effective symptom relief with daily drug administration and gave directions to staff to monitor target behaviors on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Review of a 03/29/2022 behavior CP showed staff identified a goal that Resident 94 would be free…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$129,568 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $42,114 — penalty dated 2025-06-10
  • $76,615 — penalty dated 2025-01-10
  • $10,839 — penalty dated 2024-05-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTONOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2009
PROVIDENCE ST. JOSEPH HEALTHOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/06/2025
BLAIR, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2016
BUCK, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
CRAWFORD, ISIAAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2012
DUFAULT, KARINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
HEJNA, DIANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2016
HUGHES, PHYLLISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2014
KINGSTON, MARY BETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2022
LYONS, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2016
MARKHAM, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
MURPHY, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2021
O'QUINN, MARVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
RIOJAS, ROGELIOIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
SORENSON, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2019
SPRUNK, ERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022
ANDERSON, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
ELMOUCHI, DARRYLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
HOFFMAN, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020
MARTIN, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2023
NEWSOM, ANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2022
GONZALES - LIM, MARICORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/11/2023
NESTERENKO, OKSANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/06/2024
SIKES, NICOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/22/2022
WARREN, TERRIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 57 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$32.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-33.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$8.5M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 31%Medicare 3%Other / private 66%

This home reported $8.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$441per resident / day
operating cost
$13,416per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$331per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505182. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next