No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES

Ownership rollup across 25 nursing homes in 1 state: Texas. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.9 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — roughly in line with the ~2.6 average of its state. It has been broadly flat, moving +0.00 stars across the same 24 homes rated throughout between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

25
Homes in this chain
3,213
Certified beds129 per home on average
79%
Occupied2,414 residents a day across 3,075 beds · 24 of 25 homes
+0.00
Star changeacross the 24 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
1
State covered
2.9
Average CMS ratingacross 24 of 25 homes CMS rates · ~2.6 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection3.0 of 524 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing1.7 of 524 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures4.0 of 524 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

12 with immediate-jeopardy citations17 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$3.2M
Related-party expensesummed across 6 homes · FY2023–2024 cost reports
5%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 6 homes reporting both figures
+0.8%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 24 homes with a cost report
$696K
Total federal fines17 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 61%Medicare 11%Other / private 28%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the 24 of 25 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Harker Heights Nursing & RehabilitationHarker Heights, TX 1 of 53 immediate-jeopardy $64,760 fined
Laredo Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLaredo, TX 1 of 56 immediate-jeopardy $93,962 fined
The EnclaveSan Antonio, TX 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $10,039 fined
The Heights at Medical CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 53 immediate-jeopardy $22,052 fined
The Heights of League CityLeague City, TX 1 of 57 immediate-jeopardy $144,668 fined
Mid Valley Nursing & RehabilitationMercedes, TX 2 of 53 immediate-jeopardy $16,611 fined
Stone Oak Care CenterSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5$9,087 fined
The Heights Of BulverdeSpring Branch, TX 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy
The Heights of North HoustonHouston, TX 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $31,541 fined
La Frontera Nursing & RehabilitationLaredo, TX 3 of 5$8,021 fined
Las Alturas De PenitasPenitas, TX 3 of 55 immediate-jeopardy $166,236 fined
Las Alturas Nursing & Transitional CareLaredo, TX 3 of 5
Rosewood HeightsKilleen, TX 3 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $42,298 fined
The Heights of TylerTyler, TX 3 of 5$14,276 fined
Country Care ManorLa Vernia, TX 4 of 5$22,143 fined
Hill Country HeightsCopperas Cove, TX 4 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $12,356 fined
The Heights Of GonzalesGonzales, TX 4 of 5
The Heights Of TomballTomball, TX 4 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $21,908 fined
The Heights On HuebnerSan Antonio, TX 4 of 5
The Heights On Valley RanchPorter, TX 4 of 5
The Heights of AtascosaPleasanton, TX 4 of 5
West Oaks Nursing & RehabilitationHouston, TX 4 of 5
Del Rio Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterDel Rio, TX 5 of 5$8,018 fined
The Heights Of AlamoAlamo, TX 5 of 5$8,414 fined
The Heights Of MagnoliaMagnolia, TXNot rated
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.