Harker Heights Nursing & Rehabilitation
415 Indian Oaks Dr, Harker Heights, TX 76548 · For profit - Corporation · 199 certified beds · (254) 699-5051 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $64,760 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-07)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.4% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.2% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.7% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.5% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 52.7% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.0% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.17 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.38 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.3%CMS range 39.1–64.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 8.2–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 69.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 81.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.5–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 199 beds and averages 136.9 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards and a received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for assistance devices in that: NAIT T did not provide Resident #1 with an assistive device (modified cup with lid) when serving coffee to prevent an avoidable accident from occurring. NAIT T served Resident #1 coffee in a standard mug which resulted in Resident #1 spilling the coffee onto her left hand and the table due to her tremors and spastic movements in both arms. The facility failed to ensure NAIT T was knowledgeable on how to locate the Kardex to determine what assistive devices were required during meal services to prevent accidents. An IJ was identified on 02/04/25. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 06:09 PM. While the IJ was removed on 02/7/25 , the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #1's order for insulin was instated upon admission from the hospital on [DATE]. -Ensure Resident #1's medication orders were accurate as she was being administered two anti-seizure medications in which she did not have a diagnosis for which resulted in a sudden change in consciousness/responsiveness and she had to be sent to the hospital. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/03/24 at 5:19 PM and an IJ template was given. While the IJ was removed on 12/05/24 at 5:29 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of no actual harm at a scope of pattern that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility failed to instate wound treatment orders for Resident #1 after she was admitted from the hospital after a hip fracture requiring surgery on 10/18/24 until 10/22/24. When she was admitted there was shearing to her sacrum and after not receiving treatment the wound was a stage III. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/03/24 at 5:19 PM and an IJ template was given. While the IJ was removed on 12/05/24 at 5:29 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of no actual harm at a scope of pattern that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided incontinent care from 11:30 p.m. until 5:50 a.m. on 06/11/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of infection, skin breakdown and diminished quality of life.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/11/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental function), dementia (memory, thinking, difficulty), bipolar (extreme mood swings), history of malignant neoplasm of bladder (cancer of the bladder), hypertension (high blood pressure), and protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 3 medication carts (MC #1) reviewed for drug storage and labeling.The facility failed to ensure MC #1 was locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.Findings include:During an observation of the nurses station on 06/11/2026 at 12:35 p.m., revealed LVN D was down one of the halls and the medication cart was up against the nurses station unattended and unlocked. MC #1 contained residents prescription medications, narcotics, antibiotic ointment, and over the counter medications. Staff and residents were observed walking past the unlocked medication cart.During an interview with LVN D on 06/11/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) for medical records.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's skin tear cleaning was documented completed in the electronic medical record for 04/07/2026, 04/08/2026, and 04/13/2026.These failures could place residents at risk for the possibility of not verifying the needed care and services to meet their needs.Findings included:A record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/16/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia (cognitive decline), Alzheimer's disease (progressive irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and cognitive skills), and hypertension (high blood pressure).A record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 03/10/2026, reflected Resident #1 was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 of 2 dumpsters reviewed for garbage disposal. The facility failed to ensure the dumpsters were free from debris on 4/14/26 and on 4/15/26. The facility failed to ensure that 2 dumpsters were closed/covered on 4/14/26, 4/15/26 and 4/26/26.CK H failed to close/cover the dumpster after using it on 4/15/26. These failures placed residents at risk of being exposed to rodents and pests.Findings included: During an observation of the facility's dumpsters on 4/14/26 at 11:45 AM, three plastic gloves and one metal can were observed between the two dumpsters and the dumpster on the left was open. During an observation interview on 4/14/26, a rodent trap was observed outside of the kitchen's back door. The Dietary Supervisor stated no the facility had not had any problems with rodents. During an observation on 4/15/26 at 10:16 AM, CK H put a bag of trash in the dumpster and walked away without closing it. An observation of the dumpster area on 4/15/26 at 10:18 PM revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the need of each resident for 2 of 6 medication carts (*the medication cart designated for use on the 100 Hall and the medication cart designated for use on the 200 Hall) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to establish a system of record of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation at each shift change for the medication cart designated for use on the 100 Hall and the medication cart designated for use on the 200 Hall. This failure could place residents at risk of drug diversions and could result in diminished health and well-being.Findings Included: Record review of the Change of Shift Narcotic Count Sheets revealed missing signatures for the following: 100 Hall Medication Cart04/03/2026 1st Shift Nurse Oncoming04/03/2026 2nd Shift Nurse Off going04/04/2026 2nd Shift Nurse Off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately after the allegation was made for 1 of 5 (Resident #131) reviewed for resident abuse in that: RN E failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse made by Resident #131 on 4/03/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for on-going abuse.Findings included: A record review of Resident #131's face sheet dated 4/16/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (uncontrolled blood sugar), intervertebral disc degeneration (gradual breakdown of spinal discs), end stage renal (kidney) disease, obesity class 3, paraplegia (paralysis of lower half of the body), heart failure, and hypertension (high blood pressure). A record review of Resident #131's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMs score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. A record review of Resident #131's care plan last revised on 3/04/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 5 (Resident #131) residents reviewed for resident abuse. The facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse made by Resident #131 on 4/03/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for on-going abuse.Findings included: A record review of Resident #131's face sheet dated 4/16/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (uncontrolled blood sugar), intervertebral disc degeneration (gradual breakdown of spinal discs), end stage renal (kidney) disease, obesity class 3, paraplegia (paralysis of lower half of the body), heart failure, and hypertension (high blood pressure). A record review of Resident #131's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMs score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. A record review of Resident #131's care plan last revised on 3/04/2026 reflected that she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 (Resident #130) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #130's care plan included interventions to address her psychosocial behaviors.This failure placed residents at risk of dwelling in a disruptive environment.The findings include: A record review of Resident #130's face sheet dated 4/16/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety disorder, cerebral vascular disease (condition affecting blood vessels), and altered mental status. A record review of Resident #130's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that she had a BIMS score of 13, which indicated minimally impaired cognition. A record review of Resident #130's care plan last reviewed on 3/09/2026 reflected that she had anxiety, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #26 and Resident #107) reviewed for grooming. The facility failed to provide showers to Resident #26 in compliance with his shower schedule.The facility failed to provide ADL facial hair care to Resident #107. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decline in skin integrity and psychological well-being. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #26's admission record, dated 04/16/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #26 had diagnoses which included: osteomyelitis (infection in a bone), diabetes (condition where the body has trouble controlling blood sugar, morbid obesity(having very high amount of body fat that significantly increases health risk), end stage renal disease ( the final stage of chronic kidney disease),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices for 5 of 13 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to implement interventions, according to the comprehensive plan of care, to check and change on rounds and as needed to keep Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5's skin clean and dry. The failure placed residents with self-care deficit, falls, and skin concerns at risk of decline or decrease in their quality of life and quality of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 1/26/2026, revealed an 81-years-old female, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnosis hemiplegia (severe paralysis affecting one side of the body, often caused by brain injury) and hemiparesis (weakness or partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs were stored properly and only authorized persons had access for 1 (MC #1) of 3 med carts reviewed for drug storage and labeling. The facility failed when MC #1 was in an unsecured location, unlocked, and was accessible to staff, residents and passers-by. This failure could place residents at risk of ingesting medications that was not prescribed to them leading to sickness.During an observation of MC #1 on 2/28/26 at 10:00 AM, revealed it was unattended, unlocked and accessible to staff, residents, and passers-by in the main lobby area. The locking mechanism was protruding outward on the medication cart. Neither the RN, nor the LVN saw the surveyor open the drawers and take pictures. During an interview with the RN on 02/28/26 at 10:23 AM, she stated the cart belonged to the LVN who was working the 300 hall. The RN stated staff were trained a couple of weeks ago on med cart storage. She stated residents could get into the cart and take medications that were not intended for them, leading to harm or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to receive written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility was changed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for room or roommate changes.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, and her RP received written notice prior to moving Resident #1 to another room. This failure could place residents at risk of having their resident rights violated and being moved into another room without notice.Findings include:Observation on 10/15/25 at 10:45 AM revealed Resident #1 was sitting up in her wheelchair in her room. She was clean and well-groomed, and dressed appropriately for the day. Resident #1's RP was also in her room placing items in her closet. Review of an undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (a neurological disorder primarily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also took into account nonsmoking residents for 1 (Resident #1) of 25 residents reviewed for smoking.The facility failed to implement their policy that smoking for team members was permitted only in approved designated areas. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe smoking environment, accidents, harm and long-lasting health concerns centered around secondhand smoke. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/16/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had the following diagnoses which included normal pressure hydrocephalus (cerebrospinal fluid builds up in the ventricles), Alzheimer's(a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), adult failure to thrive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike including keeping the facility comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities initially certified after October 1, 1990, must maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81 F; for 1 of 1 memory care unit.The facility failed to maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels in the memory care unit when the local temperatures were at 97 Degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the temperature inside the memory care unit was 93 degrees (F) on 08/09/2025. An IJ was identified on 08/09/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 8:47pm. While the IJ was removed on 08/11/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because (e.g.) all staff had not been trained on temperatures and hydration.This failure could affect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry-out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for three of four (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) residents reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility failed to shave the underside of Resident #1's chin hair that was approximately 1 cm in length.2. The facility failed to shave the underside of Resident #2's chin hair that was approximately 1 cm in length.3. The facility failed to shave the underside of Resident #3's chin hair that was approximately 1 cm in length.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decline in self-confidence, isolation, low self-esteem, general happiness, and satisfaction, and feeling undignified. 1.Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 7/1/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease (disrupted blood flow to brain), Type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for food labeling and storage in that: The facility failed to ensure the foods were labeled and dated in the kitchen refrigerator. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of foodborne illness. An observation on 7/02/2025 at 9:17 AM of the facility's only refrigerator revealed the following: - Salad greens in a metal container covered with clear, plastic wrap did not have a label containing the opened on and discard by dates. - Pasta noodles in a metal container covered with tinfoil did not have a label containing the opened on and discard by dates. - A yellow, non-opaque liquid, with chunks (like creamed corn) in a metal container covered with tinfoil did not have a label containing the opened on and discard by dates. During an interview on 7/02/2025 at 9:18 AM the DM stated, Those containers should have been labeled and dated and everyone was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for pain recognition and management. The facility failed to ensure staff accurately assessed Resident #1's pain levels after falls in January and February 2025. Staff used a numerical pain scale instead of a pain ad assessment on Resident #1, who was unable to verbalize his pain level. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of serious injury, pain, being misdiagnosed, receiving improper care and services, not treated timely, effectively, and consistently. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 02/14/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had medical diagnoses that included unspecified cerebral infarction (a medical condition where blood flow to the brain is disrupted, causing brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to determine that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled (a system of recordkeeping that ensures an accurate inventory of medication by accounting for controlled medications that have been received, dispensed, administered, and/or, including the process of disposition) for )4 of 6 Narcotic Count Sheets reviewed for Change of Shift Narcotic Counts. The facility failed to ensure all controlled medications were accurately reconciled at the start and end of each shift. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation by drug diversion and could result in diminished health and well-being. Record Review of the Change of Shift Narcotic Counts for the 100 Hall on 02/05/2025 at 2:20pm, of the Change of Shift Narcotic Counts for the 100 Hall revealed missing documentation for 02/04/2025 for the night shift. Record Review of the 200/300 Hall count sheet on 02/05/2025 at 2:20PM revealed missing documentation for night shift on 02/03/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and failed to protect and promote the rights of the residents for 4 of 10 (Resident # 30, Resident #50, Resident #108, and Resident #190) residents observed for dignity. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30, Resident #50, and Resident #108 were assisted with feeding in a dignified manner. 2. The facility failed to promote Resident #190's dignity while dining when staff did not serve her lunch tray for approximately 45 minutes after tablemate was served. These failures could place residents at risk of experiencing humiliation, degradation, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: 1. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated, 02/05/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for residents who consumed foods orally from the only kitchen in the facility in that: 1. a) The test tray of the lunch meal on 02/06/25 was lukewarm, unappetizing in appearance (no seasoning observed, and soggy roll on the plate), not cooked well (related to beef and pasta noodles) and lacked seasoning and flavor. b) The facility failed to provide palatable food that was attractive or appetizing to residents' who complained the food did not look or taste good. 2. The facility failed to follow the puree diet recipe. The puree scramble eggs recipe required three tablespoons and one teaspoon of food thickener. There was not a recipe for oatmeal. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life. The findings include: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure DC K used proper hand hygiene during food preparation. 2. The facility failed to ensure DC L wore a beard guard when standing over food prep table. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/07/2025 between 6:40 AM and 7:15 AM, DC K began to prepare puree meal. DC K did not wash her hands prior to preparing puree food. She did not wear gloves or wash hands when she was placing food in the puree equipment. DC K touched the following during the process of preparing puree food: her clothes, menu manual, an empty plastic bag, top of cardboard box, plastic container drawer where utensils were stored, surveyor shirt, and the right side of upper portion of her pants. DC K touched the top of blueberry muffins located on the steam table and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident # 30, and Resident #80) reviewed ADL care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 and Resident #80 nails were cleaned, trimmed, and did not have any rough edges. This failure could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated, 02/05/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #30 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), need assistance for personal care (assistance with basic daily activities like bathing, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #400 and Resident #188). 1. ADON A observed Resident #400 sliding out of the bed and walked out without aiding the resident with bed mobility. 2. The facility failed to ensure a qualified staff fed Resident #188. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for injury, harm, and low sense of self-worth. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #400's face sheet dated [DATE] reflected am [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included cerebral infarction (stroke- occurs when blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), acute pulmonary edema (condition caused by fluid in the lungs), acute kidney failure, history of falling, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates residents' allergies, intolerances, and preferences for two (2) of ten (10) residents (Resident # 50 and Resident # 241) reviewed for food allergies. The facility failed to honor Resident #50's food preference according to her meal ticket and failed to ensure Resident #50 was not served beef, which her meal ticket reflected she disliked. The facility kitchen failed to honor Resident # 241's food allergies according to her meal ticket and served her products containing gluten (oatmeal, blueberry muffin, dinner roll, and egg noodles) which her meal ticket stated she had an allergy to gluten. This failure placed the resident at risk of consuming a food allergen and of receiving and consuming foods not of their preferred preference which could result in diminished health status. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #50's face sheet, dated 02/06/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #57) observed for infection prevention. The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented and used when CNA-G and CNA-J provided perineal and catheter care for Resident #57. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for spread of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet dated 12/09/2023 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old woman, with an initial admission date of 10/18/2021, with re-admission on [DATE] and with diagnoses which included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition that affects how the body uses sugar (glucose) for energy), Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder (a condition where the nerves controlling bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's RP when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) reviewed for change in condition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's RP was notified when he was sent out to the hospital for low blood pressure on 01/27/2025 while at his dialysis treatment. This failure could place residents at risk of their responsible party not being involved in ensuring safety. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/01/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnosis was end stage renal disease(kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids) and unspecified dementia(signs of memory loss but specific underlying cause cannot be identified. A record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/13/2024, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 1, which indicated severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who was licensed or registered by the state for 2 of 2 Activity Director (AD) reviewed for qualified professionals, in that: The facility failed to have a qualified AD to serve as the director of the activities program. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. The findings included: Interview on 12/07/24 at 9:54 am the AD revealed she was just hired as an AD; she was previously a CNA. She stated she was enrolled in the AD certification and training program, but she was not certified. Interview on 12/08/24 at 10:57 am with the ADM revealed the facility currently did not have ADs who were certified qualified therapeutic recreation specialists or certified activity professionals. The ADM revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the resident representative(s) when there was an accident involving the resident which results in injury and had the potential for requiring physician intervention for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents RP's reviewed for incidents. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's RP that staff observed Resident #1 had an injury of unknown origin. Staff observed Resident #1 had a black eye on 10/27/24 at 1:30 PM and didn't know how Resident #1 sustained the injury. Resident #1's RP was not notified until 10/27/24 at 7:39 PM. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's RP that an incident happened with Resident #1 on 10/25/24. Resident #1's RP wasn't notified of any incidents on 10/25/24 until 10/27/24 at 7:39 PM This deficient practice could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life, abuse, continuous incidents and accidents, and neglect. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 10/29/24, reflected a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wheelchair was clean. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of neglect, infection, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 10/29/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, generalized muscle weakness, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/11/24, reflected she was dependent on staff assistance with her ADLs except eating, in which she was independent. Review of Resident #1's BIMS assessment, dated 10/29/24, reflected she had a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews , the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations were reported immediately or not later than 24 hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for incidents. The facility failed to report to the SA an incident where Resident #1 was found with a black eye on 10/27/24. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of abuse and/or neglect. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 10/29/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, generalized muscle weakness, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/11/24, reflected she had one fall with no injury, no skin issues, and was dependent on staff assistance with her ADLs except eating, in which she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #65's interventions encouraging wearing footwear to help prevent falls were in place. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #78 was encouraged to wear footwear to prevent falls during her behavior of continuous walking. Progress notes reflected a history of falls on 10/24/22 and 11/07/22 (no interventions listed to limit fall risk) These failures could place residents at risk of falls and of not receiving care according to their needs. These findings were: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #65 reflected she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Alzheimer's disease, HTN, Dementia, Generalized Anxiety disorder, edema, Psychotic disorder with delusions, Unsteady gait. Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #65 dated 11/10/23 reflected a BIMS score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who has a prosthesis is provided care and assistance, consistent with professional standards of practice, the residents' goals, and preferences, to wear and be able to use the prosthetic device for one (Resident #119) of seven residents reviewed for orthotic devices, in that: The facility failed to follow a physician's order, written on 8/22/2023 for Resident 119 to schedule an evaluation for a prosthesis. By the time the survey was being conducted the appointment had not been scheduled yet This failure could place residents at risk for health status decline, impaired mobility, without the support and therapeutic effects of prostheses devices. Findings include: Review of Resident #119 admission record, undated, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Peripheral vascular Disease (a disorder limiting blood flow in the arms and legs), Acquired Absence of the left leg below knee, unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Interview and record review the facility failed to maintain oxygen therapy equipment in accordance with their policy. Residents #69, #2, #28, #195, #197, #12 and #98 had oxygen equipment and tubing in their rooms undated and unserviced . This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious bacteria/viruses in the tubing because of unknown use. Findings include: Review of the Face sheet for Resident #12 reflected she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of: Unspecified Dementia, High Blood Pressure, Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction, Unsteady gait, Depression, Metabolic Encephalopathy . Review of the annual MDS assessment for Resident #12 dated 9/28/23 reflected a BIMS score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her functional assessment reflected she required extensive assistance of most ADLs except eating and moving in her wheelchair. No use of oxygen therapy was marked. Review of Resident #12's Care Plan reflected interventions were in place for: weight loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 3 of 4 medication carts (300/500 nurse med cart, 200/300 nurse med cart, and 100 treatment/nurse cart) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to properly label and date three insulin pens in the 300/500 nurse med cart. The facility failed to properly date one insulin pen in the 200/300 nurse med cart. The facility failed to properly label one insulin pen in 100 treatment/nurse cart. These failures could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications, not receiving prescribed drugs or contaminated medication. Findings included: Observation on 12/27/23 at 12:39 PM of the 300/500 nurse med cart revealed three opened insulin pens with no open date and one opened insulin pen with no resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store foods properly and maintain a sanitized food preparation area for the facility's only kitchen, which was reviewed for dietary services. 1. The facility failed to properly store, seal, and date food in the facility's walk-in refrigerator and freezer. These failures placed residents at risk of exposure to food borne pathogens. Findings include: During an observation of the kitchen on 12/27/2023, starting at 10:36 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager the following observations were made: Refrigerator findings included the following Produce items were stored on the floor in the walk-in refrigerator. *1 Box of Bananas *1 Box of tomatoes *2 boxes of romaine lettuce *2 Boxes of cabbage *1 Box of mixed herbs Freezer findings included 2 boxes of opened, undated, golden potato patties were stored on the floor in a cardboard box, and undated. During an interview on 12/27/23 at 1:39 p.m., the Dietary Manager reported her expectation were when she inspects the walk-in freezer and refrigerator was that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #59, Residents #68, and Residents #111) and 1 of 1 staff (MA Y) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure multi-use equipment was properly cleaned between each resident. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection and cross contamination during medication administration. Findings included: Review of Resident #59's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility initially on 08/09/19 and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease limiting air flow from the lungs), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance of his/her quality of life and recognized their individuality for two (Resident #1 and # 9) of 7 residents reviewed for resident rights in that: 1. The CTA fed Resident #1 while standing next to her. 2. LVN C referred to Resident #9 who requires assistance with feeding, as a feeder. These failures could place residents who needed feeding assistance at risk for lacking a dignified existence and unmet needs. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission record, undated, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety, personal history of traumatic brain injury, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and other mental disorders due to known physiological condition. Review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated 10/21/23, reflected she had a BIMS score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that provided effective and person-centered care of individualized resident care needs for 1 (Resident # 337) of 6 residents reviewed for person-centered care planning. 1. The care plan was initiated 8 days after Resident #337 was admitted . 2. The care plan only addressed activities; the care plan did not address goals, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, or social services. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Review of Resident #337's admission record, undated, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, overactive bladder, chronic pain, rhinitis, GERD, and history of falling. Review of Resident #337's admission MDS assessment, dated 12/27/2023, did not reflect Resident #337's diagnoses, functional status or treatments and services (as applicable). Review of Resident #337's care plan, initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for one out of three residents (Resident #74) reviewed for hazards in that: Resident #74 was observed to have disinfectant sprays and wipes on the counter of her sink in her room . Findings included: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #74 reflected she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Unspecified Dementia, Hyperlipidemia, HTN, Depression, unsteady gait, and Chronic Kidney disease. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #74 dated 10/25/23 reflected a BIMS score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her functional assessment reflected she was independent in most ADLs and needed one person assistance for mobilizing and bathing. She was assessed as occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #74 reflected interventions were in place for: independently ambulating with a cane, Dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who used psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions, unless clinically contraindicated, for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received gradual dose reductions (GDR) for Buspirone and Zoloft. These failures could affect residents on psychoactive medications, by placing them at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility most recently on 06/14/22. Her diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood), generalized anxiety disorder (intense and excessive worry and fear), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder with persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation The facility failed to ensure food was stored properly in the dry storage area and walk-in refrigerator. The deficient practice placed residents who were served from the kitchen at risk for health complications and foodborne illnesses. Findings included: During an observation of the kitchen dry storage area on 12/12/2023 at 11:04 am, four sealed zip bags container crackers, gelatin product and bottled water sitting on a tray. The zip bags were not labeled or dated, and the tray was not labeled or dated. There were two unsealed zip bags of dry cereal unlabeled and undated, an unsealed zip bag containing an open box of cereal product and an opened bag of flour product, an opened zip bag containing pasta products. Further observation revealed a scoop covered in a white powdered substance sitting on a wire shelf above the flour bin. During an observation of the walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, in response to allegations of abuse, neglect or mistreatment, have evidence that all alleged violations were investigated, and the results of all investigations were reported to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for One (Resident #2) of six (6) residents reviewed, in that: The facility failed to report, within five days, the results of an investigation of an allegation of Misappropriation of Property by Resident #2 when her debit card was compromised. This failure placed residents at risk for continued abuse or neglect without appropriate corrective actions being taken. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 12/13/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases, Fracture Right Femur (broken hip), Fracture of the Left Radius (broken wrist), Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of Resident #2's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which includes the accurate acquiring and administering of medications to meet the needs for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for pharmacy services, in that: The facility failed to reorder Resident #1's seizure medication three days prior to running out and failed to follow up on the order, causing her to miss one dose in the evening on 12/10/2023. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, decreased quality of life and hospitalization Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/13/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Seizures, Cerebral Infarction (stroke), Vascular Dementia (memory loss cause be circulation issues), Congestive Heart Failure, Type 2 Diabetes (Blood sugar regulation disorder), Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) and Hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #1's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for call lights in that: Resident #3 was observed in their room with call lights not within reach. This failure could affect all residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in injury or needs not being met. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated 10/26/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Hypertensions (high blood pressure), Type 2 Diabetes (blood sugar disorder), muscle weakness and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #3's MDS dated [DATE], reflected resident had a BIMS score of 0 (zero) indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of resident's functional status in MDS section G, revealed resident needed extensive assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 13 of 18 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12 and #13) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to isolate or test for COVID-19 for roommates (Residents #2, #4,and #6) of COVID-19 positive residents after the roommates were exposed to COVID-19. 2. The facility failed to ensure signs and symptoms of COVID-19 were documented for Residents #2, #4 and #6 during the period following exposure. 3. LVN C, HK D and CNA E failed to ensure they donned CDC-recommended PPE when they entered rooms of COVID-19 positive residents. These failures contributed to Residents #8, #9, #10, #11, #12 and #13 testing positive for COVID-19 and placed other residents at risk of infection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices for 1 of 6 (Resident #3) residents reviewed for self-determination. The facility failed to honor Resident #3's Power of Attorney's request to change to a different Pharmacy. This failure could place residents who want to change pharmacies at risk for financial hardship, lack of self-determination, and unmet needs. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's Face sheet dated 9/1/2023 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes (blood sugar disorder), End stage renal disease (kidney disease), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Cardiac Arrhythmia (Heart Rhythm disorder). The Face sheet reflected that Resident #3 had a Financial POA and reflected the pharmacy listed was the facility pharmacy and not the pharmacy request by the POA in July of 2023. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$64,760 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $12,441 — penalty dated 2025-02-07
- $52,319 — penalty dated 2024-12-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 05/01/2024 |
| INTERNATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 05/01/2024 |
| APOLINAR, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/01/2015 |
| TOUCHSTONE STRATEGIES - HARKER HEIGHTS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| BOENING, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| CAMPBELL, LESLIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| CASTILLO, LYNNEA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| GARCIA, LEONARDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/11/2025 |
| PEREZ, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/16/2026 |
| SEHLKE, BRYON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| ZUROVEC, DARRELL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| FELLBAUM, ERNEST | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| FELLBAUM, KELLY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| STUDER, LAURA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| STUDER, STANLEY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| AEGIS THERAPIES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| ALAMO ADVISORS LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| CARVAJAL PHARMACY LTC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| FELLBAUM 2023 DESCENDANTS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| H-C ASSOCIATES, LTD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS - KILLEEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| JAN STUDER 2023 SPOUSAL TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| KELLY FELLBAUM 2023 SPOUSAL TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| PLANTE & MORAN PLLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| STUDER 2023 DESCENDANTS TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| THE BRYON AND RENA SEHLKE LIVING TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| TRIDENT HEALTH SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
| STONE, DIANA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675909. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.