Hill Country Heights

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 75.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.478 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards and received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transfers in that: CNA A failed to provide adequate supervision and transfer assistance for Resident #1 in the shower resulting in Resident #1 falling and having an open right ankle fracture with bleeding. Resident #1 had to be hospitalized and required surgical intervention. The facility failed to update the Kardex and POC to reflect current safe transfer status requirements for Resident #1 and 12 other residents. The facility failed to ensure CNAs were knowledgeable on how to locate the Kardex to determine if 1 or 2 staff were required to safely transfer/assist a resident. An IJ was identified on 06/21/24. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 04:25 PM. While the IJ was removed on 06/23/2024, the facility remained out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1.The facility failed to ensure sanitation practices (ensuring trash receptacles were securely covered, ensuring kitchen floors were free from debris, ensuring kitchen utensils were free of dried debris, ensuring kitchen utility cart was debris free, and ensuring kitchen shelving was debris free)2.The facility failed to label and date all food items in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness. During an observation on 5/19/26 at 6:13 am, of the facility's kitchen revealed: -Utility cart next to steam table had dried food debris and spilled dried liquids of red and brown color on all 3 levels of the utility cart.-microwave revealed the inside top of the microwave to have dried food debris on the ceiling of the microwave.-overhead shelf near cooktop revealed a container of [NAME] Krispie cereal labeled cereal and dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 resident (Resident #20) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 received her divided plate and small 4 oz. cups with a straw at mealtimes and was included in her care plan. These failures could affect residents and put them at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 05/20/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Cerebral palsy (a condition caused from damage or abnormal development to a part of the brain which is responsible for muscle movement and leads to movement disorders and may result in developmental delays and sensory impairments), unspecified severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility failed to ensure ADNS LVN used aseptic technique (a procedure that healthcare providers use to prevent the spread of germs that cause infection) during tracheostomy care and tracheostomy suctioning for Resident #7 by not performing hand hygiene, placing barriers, performing proper suction depth procedures or using sterile equipment during care on 05/20/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infections and respiratory distress.Findings included: Review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 05/21/2026 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and cups with straws for resident who need them for 1 of 6 (Residents #20) residents reviewed for special eating equipment. The facility failed to provide Resident #20's physician ordered divided plate and 4 oz cup with straw with lid for drinking on 05/20/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by weight loss, diminished independence, and self-esteem.Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 05/20/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Cerebral palsy (a condition caused from damage or abnormal development to a part of the brain which is responsible for muscle movement and leads to movement disorders and may result in developmental delays and sensory impairments), unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition (condition where the body is not getting enough protein and calories leading to weight loss,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's health status (that is, a deterioration in health status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications), and need to alter treatment significantly for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify the wound care provider when Resident #1's sacral region continued to develop new areas of MASD from 07/08/2025 to 08/22/2025. This failure could result in decreased continuity of care, and a delay in the treatment and services needed. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/30/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 05/12/2025 and discharge date of 09/26/2025 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted leading to brain tissue damage), hypertensive heath and chronic kidney disease with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all assistive devices were maintained and free of hazards for four (Residents #13, #21, 48 and #221) of fifteen residents reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to properly maintain wheelchairs for Residents #13, #21, #48 and #221. These failures could place residents at risk for equipment that is in unsafe operating condition, which could cause injury. Findings included: Review of Resident #13's annual MDS assessment, dated 12/04/2024, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction (stroke), generalized weakness, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (loss of use arms and legs). Resident #13 had a BIMs score of 00 indicating she was severely cognitively impaired and unable to make decisions for herself. Section GG of the MDS reflected wheelchair mobility for locomotion. Review of the Resident #13's plan of care dated 12/04/2024 with updates reflected goals and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 (MA A) staff members and 2 of 4 residents (Residents #47, and #221) reviewed for infection control procedures. MA A failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Residents #47 and #221. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #47's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/25/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #47 had diagnoses which included: Diabetes (high blood sugar), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident #47 was cognitive and able to make decisions and required assistance of one staff for activities of daily living. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews , the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for residents who consumed foods orally from the only kitchen in the facility in that: 1. The facility failed to provide palatable food that was attractive or appetizing to residents' who complained the food was unidentifiable and did not taste good. 2. The test tray of the lunch meal foods were dry, bland, and cold. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1. a. During a confidential interview and observation on 01/29/24 at 12:52 PM a resident stated she was not eating the unstuffed peppers being served and said, I do not eat anything I cannot look at and easily identify or know what it is. An observation of the resident's lunch plate revealed the served unstuffed peppers entrée was not touched by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure dry storage food was properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure dry storage items were sealed properly. 3. The facility failed to properly label and date items in the refrigerator and freezer. 4. The facility failed to ensure expired food was discarded. 5. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff practiced proper hand hygiene and glove use. 6. The facility failed to ensure hairnets were worn while in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 01/29/24 at 08:49 AM the following was observed: 1. Baked beans were observed in a metal pan covered with saran wrap with use by date of 01/03/24. 2. Pie crust sealed in a clear bag with no label or date observed in the freezer. 3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for two (Resident #3 and Resident #39) of six residents reviewed for rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 catheter bag was covered when out of room. 2. The facility failed to provide dignity and respect for Resident #39 by not aiding a resident that required assistance in dressing. These failures placed the residents at risk of a decline of their sense of dignity, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 01/31/2022, reflected a 70 -year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of: cognitive communication disorder (difficulty with any aspect of communication that is affected by disruption of cognition such as: attention, memory, organization, and problem…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,356 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,356 — penalty dated 2024-06-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX