The Heights at Medical Center
3935 Medical Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 134 certified beds · (210) 614-4888 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $22,052 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.4% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.5% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.5% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.1% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.3% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.2% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 29.8% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.68 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.82 | 2.06 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.6%CMS range 32.4–56.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.1–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 86.4 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with Resident #2's primary care physician when an incident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #2's responsible party and ensure the MD was notified of an incident when Resident #2 fell on [DATE] at 1:30 AM which resulted in bruising to the left hand, slight discoloration began to form on the left thumb and a change in skin condition. An IJ was identified on 05/26/2024 at 12:52 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:00 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/28/2024 at 2:05 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not been trained on fall prevention. This deficient practice could place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 11 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was not left without care after her initial fall on 03/08/24 at 1:30 AM until after a second fall on 03/08/24 at 6:30 AM which resulted in a left hip and left distal radius fracture. An IJ was identified on 05/26/2024 at 12:52 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:00 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/28/2024 at 2:05 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not been trained on fall prevention. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of experiencing a delay in treatment that could resulted in harm or potentially death. The findings included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 11 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards supervision. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of Resident #1 between 01/28/2024 at 10:30 PM and in Resident #1 being found outside of the facility on 01/29/2024 at 3:06 AM. An IJ was identified on 05/26/2024 at 12:52 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:00 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/28/2024 at 2:05 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not been trained on supervision and elopement. This deficient practice could result in a risk to the residents' health and safety and placed the resident at risk of heat or cold exposure, dehydration and/or other medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, and homelike environment including a window that would open to allow fresh air in for 1 (Resident #54) of 1 observed for comfortable and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's room window was not screwed shut and would be able to open when resident desired fresh air. This failure could place the residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable and could diminish quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #54's face sheet, dated 08/15/2025, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute respiratory failure, unspecified whether hypoxia or hypercapnia (a condition where the lungs are unable to adequately oxygenate the blood or remove carbon dioxide, and the specific cause (either low oxygen or high carbon dioxide) is not identified), sleep apnea (a common disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep), and chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #76) of twenty-one residents reviewed for MDS assessments. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's annual MDS, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was receiving the services of the state level II PASRR due to his intellectual disability. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #76's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicted the resident used a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) at hours of sleep due to his sleep apnea. These deficient practice could affect residents who receive care and could result in missed or inappropriate care.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 08/15/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of intellectual disability (disability that affects the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 (Resident #51 and #60) of 4 residents reviewed for incontinence care. 1. When CNA-B was providing peri care to Resident #51, CNA-B cleaned the resident's genital area without separating the labia. 2. When CNA-C was providing peri care with urinary indwelling catheter to Resident #60, CNA-C did not clean entire scrotum. These failures could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of urinary tract infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #51's face sheet, dated 08/15/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of overactive bladder. Record review of Resident #51's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Residents #36) of 1 Resident whose records were reviewed for oxygen use. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's oxygen tubing was changed every week, and oxygen filter was checked and cleaned every week per the physician order. This deficient practice could affect any respiratory on oxygen therapy and could contribute to respiratory distress, infections, pneumonia and an overall decline in their physical condition.The findings included: Record review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 08/15/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of shortness of breath, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service.Cook failed to wear beard restraints while working in the kitchen.Dietary Aide did not properly wear hair restraints in a way that covered all their hair. This failure could place residents who receive food prepared in the facility's only kitchen by placing them at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination. The findings were: Observation of the facility kitchen on 08/13/2025 at 03:48 PM revealed Cook's beard restraint not covering his facial hair while in the kitchen's food prep area. Observation of the facility's kitchen on 08/14/2025 at 10:40 AM revealed Dietary Aide not wearing hair restraint that covered all his hair while in the kitchen's food prep area.Interview with Dietary Aide on 08/14/2025 at 3:10 PM revealed he had received training from the dietary manager on appropriate hygiene when he started. The Dietary Aide stated hair restraints should cover all hair on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #60) of 21 residents reviewed for infection control practices. LVN-A was administering medications via Resident #60's gastrostomy tube, LVN-A did not wear a gown while . Resident #60 had EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) status. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections.The findings included: Record review of Resident #60's face sheet, dated 08/15/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory and thinking ability), acute respiratory failure (usual exchange between oxygen and carbon dioxide in the lungs does not occur), heart failure (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary that included a post-discharge plan of care that is developed with the participation of the resident and, with the resident's consent, and the resident representative that included where the individual planned to reside, any arrangements that have been made for the resident's follow up care and any post discharge medical and non-medical services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for inappropriate discharge.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was given a proper discharge when the resident checked out on pass on 7/11/25 and did not return to the facility. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being discharged and causing a disruption in their care and services and potential decline in health. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 7/30/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] and 4/16/25 with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skills set to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plan of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for 1 of 3 nursing staff (LVN A) reviewed for nursing services. LVN A did not notify the DON or the Administrator until Monday 7/14/25 when Resident #1 went out on pass on Friday 7/11/25, and the resident did not return. Resident #1 was scheduled to return to the facility on Saturday 7/12/25.This failure could place residents at risk of staff not providing nursing or related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for since April 2024. The facility failed to have either a full-time dietitian or certified dietary manager on staff since April 2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving sufficient food and nutritional services, which could negative impact overall resident nutrition. Findings included: Record review of the facility's key staff report reflected no dietary manager or dietitian listed. In an interview on 07/18/24 at 10:21 AM with the Head Cook/Supervisor in Training, he stated he had been at the facility for three years. He stated the Dietary Manager had left the facility about four months ago. He stated the Dietitian visits the facility at least three or four times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three (Resident #9, Resident #40,and Resident #43) of nineteen residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #9, Resident #40, and Resident #43's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's Face Sheet, dated 07/16/2024, reflected that resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #9 was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (a chronic and progressive movement disorder) without dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movements of the face, arms, or legs). Review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility for 8 (room [ROOM NUMBER], #103, #104, #106, #110, #113, #116, and facility shower room) of 12 rooms observed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident rooms #102, #103, #104, #106, #110, #113, #116, and facility shower room were clean and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s floor was repaired of cracks to prevent accidents. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an unclean, unsafe and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 07/16/24 at 10:06 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the entry way into the resident's bathroom had a large crack in the floor and a piece of tile was broken off. On the floor, behind the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's refrigerator was labeled and dated according to guidelines. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the kitchen area was thoroughly cleaned. 3. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's freezer was labeled and dated according to guidelines. 4. The facility filed to ensure kitchen equipment in the kitchen area, was thoroughly cleaned. 5. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry food area was labeled and dated according to guidelines. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observations on 07/16/24 from 08:35 AM to 08:50 AM in the facility's only kitchen reflected: One large container of diced pineapples in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Resident #51) of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure LVN A closed the door and provided privacy obtaining Resident #51's blood sugar. This failure could place the residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence maintained. Findings included: Review of Resident #51's Face Sheet, dated 07/17/2024, reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #51 was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar) without complication. Review of Resident #51's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/05/2024, reflected resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 03. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated diabetes mellitus as one of resident #51's active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for two (Resident #40 and Resident #43) of eight residents reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40's Quarterly MDS Assessment accurately reflected that Resident #40 still had his g-tube (gastrostomy feeding tube: a tube that is surgically inserted through the skin of the belly and into the stomach). The facility failed to ensure Resident #43's Quarterly MDS Assessment accurately reflected that Resident #43 still had his g-tube. The facility failed to ensure Resident #'s 43's Quarterly MDS Assessment accurately reflected that Resident #43 had impairment to his right hand. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings included: Resident #40 Review of Resident #40's Face Sheet, dated 07/16/2024, reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for two (Resident #40 and Resident #43) of eight residents reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 and Resident #43 were care planned for their g-tube (gastrostomy feeding tube: a tube that is surgically inserted through the skin of the belly and into the stomach) not being used for nutrition but was still connected to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. Findings included: Resident #40 Review of Resident #40's Face Sheet, dated 07/16/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #40 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 (Residents #26 and #63) of 2 residents reviewed for (ADLs) care provided to dependent residents. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #26 received scheduled showers reviewed for the past 30 days (06/16/24 - 07/16/24). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident and #63 received scheduled showers reviewed for the past 30 days (06/16/24 - 07/16/24). These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene and decreased self- esteem. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #26's Face Sheet, dated 07/17/2024, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Kidney Failure and required ADL assistance. Record review of Resident #26's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection for one (Resident #44) of twelve residents observed for incontinent care . The facility failed to ensure that CNA D did not wipe from front to back while providing incontinent care to Resident 44 on 07/16/24. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of urinary tract infections. Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #44's Face Sheet, dated 07/16/2024, reflected resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included post COVID-19 condition and pneumonia. Review of Resident #44's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 06/01/2024, reflected Resident #44 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated Resident #44 was always incontinent for bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #44's Comprehensive Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral (intake of food through a tube in the gastrointestinal tract) feeding for one (Resident #43) of four residents reviewed for gastrostomy tube management. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #43 had orders to observe the g-tube (gastrostomy feeding tube: a tube that is surgically inserted through the skin of the belly and into the stomach) even though it was not used by the resident. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #43 had order to flush and check the placement of the g-tube every shift. These failures could place residents who had g-tube at risk for having a clogged g-tube. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's Face Sheet, dated 07/16/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #43 was diagnosed with dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Residents #1) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's mask for CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure: machine used to deliver pressurized air through a mask to keep airways open) was properly stored. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's humidifier had water in it. This failure could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 07/16/2024, reflected that resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included pneumonia (inflammation of the lungs) and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (insufficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine dental care for one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to ensure assist Resident #31 with getting a dental appointment when requested by the responsible party in March 2024 This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving required dental services to avoid complications with her eating. Findings included: Review of Resident #31's Face Sheet, dated 07/17/2024, reflected that resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included denture use. Review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 04/20/2024, reflected that Resident #31 had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 08 (moderate cognitive impairment). Review of Resident #31's Comprehensive Care Plan updated on 03/08/24 reflected that Resident #31 was care planned for Maintain adequate nutritional status and good oral hygiene daily and ongoing over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one ( Resident #51) of twelve residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that LVN B and RA F changed their gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #51. This failure could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #51's Face Sheet, dated 07/17/2024, reflected resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #51 was diagnosed with sepsis (an infection of the blood stream). Review of Resident #51's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/05/2024, reflected resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 03. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to personal privacy for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #4) reviewed for dignity. 1. Resident #2's privacy curtain was not closed completely during wound care on 6/21/24. 2. Resident #4's privacy curtain was not closed completely during wound care on 6/22/24. These failures could affect residents by contributing to poor self-esteem and decreased self-worth and quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's Facesheet, dated 6/21/24, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Seizure (burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells causing temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements, behaviors, sensations or states of awareness), GERD (digestive disease in which stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining) , Muscle Weakness, Glaucoma (condition that can cause blindness by damaging the optic nerve)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 8 medication carts (the 100-hallway medication cart) reviewed for medication storage, The facility failed to ensure the 100-hallway medication cart was locked when it was left unattended in the common area in front of the nurses' station. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings were: In an observation on 6/19/2024 at 6:30 PM, the 100-hallway cart was observed unlocked and unattended in the common area near the nurse's station. The surveyor was able to open the drawers without staff intervening. The 100-hallway cart contained over-the-counter medications, prescription medications and glucose monitoring paraphernalia. Non-ambulatory residents were in the area. In an interview on 6/19/2024 at 6:35 PM, the DON stated the surveyor was the only visitor in the immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 staff (RN A) reviewed for infection control. During Resident wound care, RN A failed to perform hand hygiene appropriately. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk for infection. Findings included: Observation of wound care on 6/23/24 at beginning at 11:06 am, revealed RN A entered the resident's bathroom and washed his hands for 4 seconds prior to gathering wound care supplies. RN A then placed wound care supplies on the resident's bedside table and returned to the bathroom, RN A washed his hands for 3 seconds. Once RN A complete wound care, he entered the bathroom and washed his hands for 2 seconds. During an interview on 6/23/24/24 at 11:35 am, RN A said he was expected to wash his hands for 15-20 seconds. RN A further stated hand hygiene was to be performed after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained the right to receive visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to receive visitors between 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of isolation, decreased emotional well-being, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: Observation on 05/22/2024 at 11:10 AM revealed a sign on the front door entrance that read visiting hours are from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Record review of Resident #11's assessment, dated 03/09/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a long-term condition that occurs when the airways to the lungs become damaged and narrow, limiting the movement of air and oxygen into the body). Interview on 05/22/2024 at 4:07 PM, Receptionist V stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for revised Care Plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was revised to reflect discontinued foley catheter. This failure could place the resident at risk of current needs not being met. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 04/19/2024 reflected that the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included altered mental status (a change in mental function), muscle wasting and atrophy (decline in muscle strength and energy), obstructive and reflux uropathy (when urine is unable to drain through the urinary tract and causes urine to back up into the kidneys), and chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys lose their ability to filter blood and remove wastes). Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician and others participating in the provision of care for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to maintain required hospice forms and documentation to ensure Resident #1 received adequate end-of-life care. This failure could place the residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated [DATE] reflected that the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included altered mental status (a change in mental function),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow the resident to obtain a copy of the records upon request and upon two working days advance notice to the facility for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed in that: The facility failed to provide a Resident #1's RP with a copy of Resident #1's medical records after a request was submitted to the facility. This deficient practice could affect residents and could contribute to a delay in the due legal process for residents. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's electronic medical record, reviewed on [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis [acid reflux], hypomagnesemia [high magnesium levels in the blood], other hyperlipidemia [high fat levels in the blood], and unspecified atrial fibrillation [an abnormal heartbeat]. There was no RP designated in this section of the electronic medical record. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's RP was notified when Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital on 7/27/23. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their family or legal representative notified when having a change of condition. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's electronic medical record, reviewed on 3/25/24, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis [acid reflux], hypomagnesemia [high magnesium levels in the blood], other hyperlipidemia [high fat levels in the blood], and unspecified atrial fibrillation [an abnormal heartbeat]. There was no RP designated in this section of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #8 and 13) reviewed for gastrostomy tube management, in that: 1. Staff N failed to check the placement of Resident #8's gastrostomy tube prior to administering feeding. 2. Staff E failed to check the placement of Resident #13's gastrostomy tube prior to medication administration. These failures could place residents with gastrostomy tubes at risk of aspiration, medical complications, and a decline in health due to inappropriate gastrostomy tube care and management. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 10/12/23 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (an area of the brain that dies due to lack of blood flow), gastrostomy (artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide separately locked compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse for 1 of 1 medication rooms, in that, Controlled medications in the narcotic waste box were accessible to any employees who had the code for the medication room. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation of the medication room on 10/12/23 at 2:52 pm with Staff L present revealed, the narcotic waste bin was attached to the Passport (Medication dispensing machine). It contained a slot on the top of the box for disposal of controlled medications. The box was full, and medications could be accessed without unlocking the box. Staff L was observed pulling medications out of the narcotic waste bin without unlocking the box. During an interview on 10/12/23 at 2:53 pm, Staff L verified that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment; including housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior, with clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition, for 1 of 2 shower rooms (200-300 hall shower room), reviewed for a clean and homelike shower room, in that: The facility failed to ensure one of 2 facility shower rooms (200-300 hall shower room) did not present with a dirty shower bed, holes in the wall, a missing shower valve, and trash. This failure placed residents at risk for infections, injuries, and demoralization. The findings included: During an observation on 05/02/2023 at 10:21 AM, revealed the 200 / 300 Hall shower room presented with a Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) shower bed. The shower bed featured a blue nylon mesh bed, with a white vinyl foam cushion on top of the blue nylon mesh. Further observation revealed the foam bed presented with tears to the vinyl covering and dark colored areas of accumulated residue.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure a bagged part of lettuce in the refrigerator dated 04/11/2023 and was not beyond the 72 hours discard time. 2. The facility failed to ensure the dietary aide did not bring rack of dirty meal trays through the kitchen during meal prep instead of the dishwashing room door. 3. The facility failed to ensure the cook while serving soup did not have gloved thumb inside the bowl resulting in soup touching thumb. These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: An observation and interview with the DM on 05/02/2023 at 9:20 a.m. revealed a partially used head of lettuce in the refrigerator with the date of 04/11/2023. The DM stated it should have been removed and thrown out after three days. Observation on 05/03/2023 at 9:55 a.m. revealed the DA taking a rolling rack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 6 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for privacy, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B completely closed Resident #9's privacy curtain while providing catheter care and incontinent care for the resident. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings include: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 05/04/2023, revealed an admission date of 03/03/2023, with diagnoses which included: History of sepsis(blood poisoning), History of urinary tract infection(infection of any part of the urinary system), Schizophrenia(serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), Hypothyroidism(decrease production of thyroid hormones) and, Hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #'9's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 13 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 18 residents (Residents #50) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's Annual MDS assessment did not incorrectly document the resident as receiving an anticoagulant. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings were: Record review of Resident #50's face sheet, dated 05/05/2023, revealed an admission date of 03/21/2023 with diagnoses that included: Metabolic encephalopathy (disease affecting brain structure or function), Type 2 diabetes mellitus(blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high.), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and, Vascular dementia(problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain). Record review of Resident #50's physician order for March 2023 revealed orders for: Clopidogrel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #36 and Resident #44) reviewed for care plan revisions 1. The facility failed to update Resident #36's care plan to only reflect the DNR code status and resolve Full Code status care plan. 2. The facility failed to update Resident #44's care plan to only reflect the DNR code status and resolve Full Code status care plan. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet, dated 05/04/2023, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, vascular dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, other hypoglycemia, dysphagia following unspecified cerebrovascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA A separated Resident #9's labia to clean between the labia during catheter and incontinent care. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 05/04/2023, revealed an admission date of 03/03/2023, with diagnoses which included: History of sepsis(blood poisoning), History of urinary tract infection(infection of any part of the urinary system), Schizophrenia(serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally), Hypothyroidism(decrease production of thyroid hormones) and, Hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #'9's admission MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to 1 of 3 medication carts (200-hall medication cart) reviewed for medication storage, in that: The facility failed to ensure the 200-hall medication cart was not left unlocked, unattended, and presented with a medication atop. This failure placed residents at risk for misappropriation of property and /or injury by misapplication of drugs. The findings included: During an observation, on 05/02/2023 at 03:03 PM, revealed the 200-hall medication cart unlocked, unattended, and unsupervised by a resident's room. Observation of the medication cart revealed a bottle of sertraline [a drug that can treat depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety disorder, and panic disorder]. The bottle was labeled sertraline 60ml; 20mg/ml. The medication was labeled with Resident #17's name. Observation of the room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #50) observed for accuracy of medical records in that: The facility failed to discontinue Resident #50 isolation precaution order. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #50's face sheet, dated 05/05/2023, revealed an admission date of 03/21/2023 with diagnoses that included: Metabolic encephalopathy (disease affecting brain structure or function), Type 2 diabetes mellitus(blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high.), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and, Vascular dementia(problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain). Record review of Resident #50's physician order for March 2023 revealed an order for:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN D and CNA I practiced glove changes and hand hygiene during incontinent care for Resident #11 This failure could place residents at risk for infections and health declines. The findings included: A record review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/25/2023, revealed Resident #11 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #11 was assessed with a 13 BIMS score, indicating intact cognition. Resident #11 was diagnosed with obstructive uropathy and neurogenic bladder [a bladder which is not able to release urine]. Resident #11 had a colostomy [a surgical operation in which a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-08-15 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for MDS transmission.The facility failed to transmit a discharge MDS assessment to the CMS system for Resident 26 who discharged on 04/29/2025 within 14 days of the discharge date .This failure could place residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required.Findings were: Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 08/15/2025, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 04/29/2025 to an assisted living facility. Resident #26's face sheet indicated resident had diagnosis of encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acute hematogenous osteomyelitis, left ankle and foot, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. Record review of Resident #26's Medicare-5 day MDS revealed it was completed on 04/01/2025.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$22,052 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,171 — penalty dated 2024-05-28
- $13,881 — penalty dated 2024-05-28
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-04 for 57 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| APOLINAR, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2024 |
| TOUCHSTONE STRATEGIES - MED CENTER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/24/2024 |
| OOMMEN, BIJU | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| ROBINSON, LARRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $441K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675890. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.