The Heights Of Bulverde
384 Harmony Hills, Spring Branch, TX 78070 · For profit - Corporation · 124 certified beds · (830) 438-1276 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.8% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.2% | 2.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.4% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.5% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.1% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.02 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 73.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.6%CMS range 35.5–55.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.8%CMS range 9.6–17.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 73.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 82.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 6.2–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 97.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to provide that Resident # 1's environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible when Resident #1 swallowed wet wipes, choked and expired. An IJ was identified on 03/14/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:11 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 03/21/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because the facility needed to monitor the implementation of the plan of removal. The failure placed all residents at risk for serious injury, harm, and/or death. Finding include: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 03/18/25 documented a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 12/23/24 with diagnoses that included dementia in other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 8 medication carts (100 Hall cart and 300 Hall cart) reviewed for storage of drugs.The facility failed to ensure the carts for 100 Hall and 300 Hall were locked and secured.This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse, medication errors, drug diversion or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed medications.Findings included:During an observation on 03/31/2026 at 08:22 am, the medication cart on 300 Hall (secure memory care unit) by nurse station was unlocked, keys in the drawer containing the narcotics, and the nurse on duty was sitting 15 to 20 feet away at a dining room table administering medication to an unknown resident. The dining room area had 8 unknown residents, and 3 more unknown residents walking around. When LVN A finished administering medication, she walked over to medication cart to ask if this surveyor needed any assistance.During an interview on 03/31/2026 at 08:27 am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control in that: Resident #1 had an open wound and did not have an EBP sign on Resident #1's room door and did not have a physician order for EBP.This failure could affect residents on enhanced barrier precautions and place them at risk for infection.The findings were:Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (when the body does not make or use insulin well) and chronic kidney disease (a reduction in kidney function).Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/24/2025, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for two of six residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for clinical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's medical record included an initial physician visit note when reviewed greater than 90 days (09/22/2025) after admission [DATE]). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's medical record included an initial physician visit note when reviewed greater than 90 days (09/22/2025) after admission [DATE]). 3. The facility failed to document wound care was provided to Resident #3 on three (3) occasions (Friday, 08/22/2025, Sunday, 08/24/2025, and Sunday, 08/31/2025) on Resident #3's August Treatment Administration Record (TAR). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from involuntary seclusion and any physical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion.The facility failed to obtain a physician order, documenting the clinical criteria met for placement in the secured/locked unit, prior to Resident #1's move to the secured unit on 06/24/2025.This failure could place residents who resided on the secure unit at risk for feelings of isolation and anxiety.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/22/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was not listed as his own responsible party with his [family member] listed as Emergency Contact #1. Resident #1 discharged on 09/01/2025. Record review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnoses, undated and accessed 09/22/2025 at 03:37 p.m., revealed diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to properly store clean resident clothing and mechanical lift slings in the facility clean laundry room.These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection.The findings included:During an observation of the clean side, noted on door of laundry room, of the nursing facility laundry room on 09/22/2025 at 04:52- 04:53 p.m., observed a bag of clean resident clothing, stored in a large clear bag with a hole in the bottom of the bag resulting in clothing spilled out and touching the laundry room floor. Observed approximately 5 mechanical lift slings hanging off the side of a trash can with straps of the slings touching the floor. During an interview on 09/26/2025 at 11:07 a.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's electronic clinical record had Hospice A Physician I's handwritten order for the indwelling urinary catheter, that had been in place for 95 days and did not discontinue the order for Hospice A when the resident admitted to Hospice B. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 10/04/2025, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included high blood pressure, diabetes (chronic elevated levels of blood sugar which can affect other organs and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) whose assessments were reviewed. The facility failed to indicate Resident #1's had an indwelling urinary catheter on her Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 10/04/2025, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included high blood pressure, diabetes (chronic elevated levels of blood sugar which can affect other organs and bodily tissues), Parkinson's disease (progressive neurological disorder that affects, movement, balance and coordination), hypothyroidism (low blood levels of thyroid hormones) and systemic Lupus Erythematosus (a chronic autoimmune disease where the body's immune system attacks healthy tissues and organs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Hospice A Physician I's handwritten order for the indwelling urinary catheter that had been in place for 95 days was on the electronic physician orders; and did not document when urinary catheter care was provided or if the urinary catheter had been replaced every 30 days as ordered by Hospice B. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in their health status.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 10/04/2025, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included high blood pressure, diabetes (chronic elevated levels of blood sugar which can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure trays of prepared and poured glasses of beverages were dated and labeled. 2. The facility failed to ensure soup warmer with soup was returned to kitchen after meal and not left out all night. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation and interview on 06/22/2025 at 9:27 AM revealed during the initial tour of the kitchen 4 trays with beverages prepared in the standing refrigerator not dated or labeled: *1 tray of 8 large glasses of milk, *1 tray of 5 large glasses of juice and water, *1 tray of 20 small glasses of orange juice and, *1 tray of 12 small glasses of milk. The [NAME] stated the trays were from breakfast and she had placed them back in the refrigerator but did not put dates on the trays. The [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including: the accurate communication and implementation of code status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #53) reviewed resident rights and advance directives. Resident #53 had a discrepancy in code status, as evidenced by contradictory records found in the medical chart. This failure to ensure consistency in the resident code status violates their autonomy and places them at risk of receiving treatment contrary to their expressed wishes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #53's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Senile Degeneration of the Brain (a decline in cognitive function, particularly memory and thinking skills), Dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning) Depression (mental health disease of high and low mood swings), Anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to request to formulate an advance directive and accurate documentation of advance directives was maintained and implemented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #53). Resident #53's OOH-DNR was signed and in misc. documents while face sheet and care plan were listed as full code. This deficient practice could place the resident at risk of receiving care inconsistent with their wishes. The findings were: Record review of Resident #53's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Senile Degeneration of the Brain (a decline in cognitive function, particularly memory and thinking skills), Dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning) Depression (mental health disease of high and low mood swings), Anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear). Record review of Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed BIMS (Basic Interview of Mental Status) Score of 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55 was provided a pad type call light which was care planned as an intervention for the resident. This deficient practice places residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to not implementing care plan interventions. The findings were: Record review of Resident #55's face sheet, dated 06/23/2025, revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, multiple sclerosis (…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #19), reviewed for pharmacy services in that the automatic calculation of the medication error rate in the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP) after 25 opportunities with 2 errors was 8%. LVN A poured two different over the counter bulk facility medications into her bare hand to administer to Resident #19 and put the ones she did not need back into the bottle during a medication administration observation. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination, health complications, and illness. The findings were: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet dated 6/25/25 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (the lack of sufficient energy or protein to meet the body's metabolic demands), and immunodeficiency due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store medication with the expiration date on packaging in compliance with state laws and regulations for 1 of 2 medication rooms (300/400 hall) observed for medication storage. The medication room on the 300/400 hall had a box with an [NAME] boot stored without an expiration date. This failure could affect residents prescribed medications and result in less potent medications provided and could result in decreased health response or misuse of medication. The findings included: Interview and observation of medication storage room for 300/400 halls on 06/23/25 at 09:00 AM revealed the date was torn off a box with an [NAME] boot (a wet compression dressing used in the treatment of venous ulcers and dries semirigid similar to a cast) and no date was on the foil package with the [NAME] boot. The DCO took the box with the [NAME] boot and discarded it in the trash. She said she did not know why the package date was torn off that way and she did not know why…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were kept in accordance with professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53 expressed Full Code status and the code status documented in the electronic medical record, placing the resident at risk of receiving improper treatment. These failures could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #53's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Senile Degeneration of the Brain (a decline in cognitive function, particularly memory and thinking skills), Dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning) Depression (mental health disease of high and low mood swings), Anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear). Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for infection control. LVN A poured two different over the counter bulk facility medications into her bare hand to administer to Resident #19 and put the pills she did not need back into the bottle during a medication administration observation. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination, health complications, and illness. The findings were: In an observation and interview on 6/24/25 at 6:36 a.m. during a medication administration observation for Resident #19, LVN A poured several cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12) 1000mcg oral tablets from a bulk facility stock bottle (unknown amount) into her bare left hand and tilted her left hand against the bottle and put all the tablets back in the bottle except one that she had in her creased palm to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were kept in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for clinical records. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's [EMR] Skin & Wound- Total Body Skin Assessments were documented in her medical record for 5 (the weeks of: 01/03/2025, 01/17/2025, 01/31/2025, 02/14/2025, and 04/04/2025) of 16 weeks. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's [EMR] Skin & Wound- Total Body Skin Assessments were documented in her medical record for 3 (the weeks of 01/14/2025, 01/28/2025, and 02/11/2025) of 15 weeks. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/23/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was coded on her Annual MDS assessment, signed as completed on 04/21/2025, for a fall without injury that occurred on 02/03/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was coded on her Quarterly MDS assessment, signed as completed on 03/09/2025, for two falls without injury, 02/09/2025 and 02/14/2025, and one fall with an injury (not major), 02/25/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/23/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female. She was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain records that are complete, accurately documented temperature for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure temperatures were taken and accurately logged for the 04/13/25 Breakfast and Lunch meals 2. The facility failed to ensure temperatures were taken and accurately logged for meals on 04/15/25 3. The facility failed to ensure temperatures were taken and accurately logged for for breakfast milk or juices from 04/13/2025 through -04/19/2025 These deficient practices could place residents at risk of serious illness related consuming meals that are prepared in an unsanitary manner. The findings were: Observation on 04/19/25 at 11:44 AM, [NAME] A did temperature checks before lunch meal service. Interview with [NAME] B on 04/19/2025 revealed revealed Dietary Aide E missed the temperatures on 04/13/25 and [NAME] D was supposed to put the temperatures in on 04/15/25. [NAME] B revealed the dietary supervisor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency for 2 of 8 Residents (Residents #1 and #2) who were reviewed for abuse, in that: 1. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse or neglect per facility policy to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) when Resident #1 died after ingesting and choking on wet wipes. 2. The facility failed to report to the State Agency an injury of unknown origin and was suspicious of abuse/neglect for Resident #2. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed, in response to allegations of neglect, have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and report the results of all investigations to the administrator and to other officials in accordance with State law, including the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 4 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation investigations. The facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin sustained by Resident #2 that was suspicious of abuse or neglect. This failure could cause diminished quality of life and place residents at risk for mistreatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 3/19/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 9/18/2023. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified dementia (progressive disorder that impairs thought processes, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and decision-making), cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plan revision/timing. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan addressed newly developed pressure wound for 40 days after initial assessment. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 11/14/2024 and ended on 12/24/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure put the resident at risk for declining health due to specific needs being unaddressed or unmet by lack of care planning. Findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 3/19/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 9/18/2023. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified dementia (progressive disorder that impairs thought processes, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and decision-making), cognitive communication deficit (impairment in the thought processes that can impact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention program to help prevent the development and transmission or communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3). The facility also failed to handle and transport linens so as to prevent the spread of infections for infection control practices. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA FF utilized appropriate PPE when providing direct care to Resident #3, who had been identified as requiring enhanced barrier precautions. 2.The facility failed to ensure CNA M removed soiled gloves prior to exiting a room, as well as securing soiled linen in a bagged or contained method at the point of collection prior to transporting. These failures could lead to the spread of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 3/20/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain (a progressive disorder that impairs the thought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1's care plan reflected using a sit-to-stand lift for Resident #1 only when holding the resident to standing position from sitting position for ADL care, including shower. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #3's care plan reflected the need for substantial asssitance with eating. These deficient practices place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. The findings included: 1. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for the provision of routine and emergency drugs and biologicals, in that: 1. Resident #2 did not receive her morning dose of antianxiety medication (busPIRone HCL for anxiety) because of lack of communication between a nurse and a CMA regarding the resident's out on pass for appointments. 2. Resident #3 did not receive her fentanyl patch for pain relief as ordered on 1/3/2023, 2/05/2023, 3/30/2023, 4/02/2024, and 5/17/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for harm by adverse reactions and not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 07/18/2024, revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
FACILITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. The walk-in freezer container approximately twenty-five boxes of frozen foods which were stored on the floor and haphazardly stacked on top of each other. 2. The reach-in refrigerator near the kitchen door contained a bottle of soda which belonged to a staff member. 3. The floor under the three-part sink in the dish room was soiled with a dark brown substance that appeared to be dirt or mud. 4. The walls throughout the kitchen were soiled with substances of various color. 5. The commercial toaster was soiled with an abundance of crumbs. 6. The microwave was soiled inside on all sides, the bottom, and the roof. 7. The fryer was soiled with an abundance of crumbs and the front and sides of the fryer were soiled with cooking oil. 8. The machines on either side of the fryer were soiled with an abundance of cooking oil. 9. The top and sides of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 1 dumpster site reviewed, in that: The area near the facility's two dumpsters was soiled with spilled kitchen oil and other refuse. This deficient practice could lead to an unsanitary environment and encourage the presence of pests. The findings were: Observation on 05/03/2024 at 4:40 p.m., of the area near the facility's two dumpsters revealed two, forty-gallon drums were located behind the facility dumpsters. The lids of both drums were loose and used fryer oil had spilled from the drums onto the ground underneath, beside, and in front of the facility dumpsters. Further observation revealed a large kitchen cooking pot with no lid and full of used fryer oil was also located behind the dumpsters. Further observation revealed the presence of assorted bits of paper, cardboard, and other refuse on the ground in the dumpster area. During an interview with the Dietary Manager, at the same time as the observation, the Dietary Manager stated he was new in his position…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-05 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #235, Resident #236, and Resident #237 ) who received Medicare skilled services and were discharged with benefits remaining, in that: 1. Resident #235 was not given a NOMNC upon discharge from skilled services. 2. Resident #236 was not given a NOMNC upon discharge from skilled services. 3. Resident #237 was not given a NOMNC upon discharge from skilled services. This deficient practice could affect residents who were discharged from skilled services with benefits remaining by denying them the right of appeal. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #235's closed record revealed the resident was not given a NOMNC upon discharge from skilled services on 04/06/2024. 2. Record review of Resident #236's closed record revealed the resident was not given a NOMNC upon discharge from skilled services on 04/04/2024. 3. Record review of Resident #237's closed record revealed the resident was not given a NOMNC upon discharge from skilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal hygiene for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living for 3 of 8 Residents (Resident #182, Resident #183, and Resident #184) whose records were reviewed for grooming and personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #182 received scheduled showers on 4/29/24 and on 5/1/24. 2. Resident #183's dirty t-shirt was changed out on 5/1/24. 3. Resident #184's face had not been shaved, his eyebrows and nose hair had not been trimmed since 4/30/24. These deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to feelings of poor self-esteem and hopelessness. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #182's face sheet, dated 5/3/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Depression Disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' environment remained as free of accidents and hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 6 of 20 residents (#1, #3, #27, #39, #46 and #185 ) reviewed for assistance with safe mechanical lifts and falls. 1. On 05/05/2024 at 03:54 PM CNA R transferred Resident #39 from her bed to her wheelchair with the assistance of 1 person and caused Resident #39 discomfort and pain. 2. On 04/16/2024 The facility assessed 4 residents (#1, #3, #27, and #46) with the need for a mechanical lift and planned for residents to receive assistance with mechanical lifts with the aid of 1 person. 3. Resident #185 fell multiple times and on 4/21/24 sustained a laceration which required multiple sutures to the left side of her head. Staff failed to implement fall mats upon admission even though she was assessed to be a high fall risk and had a fall history prior to her admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rates were not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 10%, based on 3 errors out of 30 opportunities which involved 2 of 8 residents (Resident #46 and #285) reviewed for medication administration and medication errors. 1. On 05/04/2024 at 07:31 AM LVN U failed to perform a safety check on the insulin injection pen prior to administering Resident #285's insulin injection. 2. On 05/04/2024 at 09:40 AM Medication Aide V administered Resident #46's antibiotic and nerve pain medication 40 minutes late. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: A record review of Resident #285's admission record, dated 5/02/2024 revealed an admission date of 04/08/2024 with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes, and neuropathy (the nerves that are located outside of the brain and spinal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 4 of 12 residents (Residents #13, #32, #33 and #285) reviewed for significant medication errors. 1. On 05/04/2024 at 07:31 AM LVN U failed to perform a safety check on the insulin injection pen prior to administering Resident #285's insulin injection. 2. On 05/04/2024 at 10:04 AM Medication Aide V administered oxcarbazepine (an anti-seizure medication), and Baclofen (an anti-muscle spasm medication) to Resident #13 late by 1 hr. and 5 minutes. 3. On 05/04/2024 at 10:09 AM Medication Aide V administered ferrous sulfide (an iron medication) and midodrine (a drug used to raise blood pressure) to Resident #32 late by 1 hr. and 9 minutes. 4. On 05/04/2024 at 10:18 AM Medication Aide V administered carbidopa-levodopa (a drug to treat Parkinson's disease) to Resident #33 late by 1 hr. and 18 minutes. These deficient practices placed residents at risk for not receiving the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed, in that: Flies too numerous to count were observed in and around the food preparation area. This deficient practice could affect residents, staff, and visitors who consume foods prepared in the facility kitchen. The findings were: Observation on 05/01/2024 at 1:20 p.m. revealed flies too numerous to count in and around the food preparation area in the facility kitchen, and especially concentrated near a box of fresh bananas. During an interview with Dietary Aide Y, at the same time as the observation, Dietary Aide Y stated, There are always flies all over the place in here [the facility kitchen]. Record review of the pest control visit logs revealed the pest control company visited bimonthly. Record review of the facility policy and procedure, titled Pest Control, effective date February 2017, revealed: 1. The community maintains an effective pest control program so that the community is free of pests and rodents. An effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a comfortable interior for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #182) who was observed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #182's bathroom was free of bad odors since admission. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to feelings of hopelessness. The findings were: Review of Resident #182's face sheet, dated 5/3/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Depression Disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (condition with exaggerated tension, worrying, and nervousness about daily life events). Review of Resident #182's baseline Care Plan, dated 4/25/24 revealed she was a new admission and no cognitive impairment was noted. Review of Resident #182's progress note dated 5/2/24 revealed she discharged from the facility on this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-05 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have physician for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 8 Residents ( Resident #185) whose records were reviewed for new orders. 1. Nursing staff failed to obtain an order for the use of side rails for Resident #185 upon admission, 4/19/24. These deficient practices could affect any resident who was a new admission and could result in residents not receiving the treatment as needed or result in not obtaining physician orders for the use of equipment. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #185's face sheet, dated 5/1/24, revealed she was admitted into the facility on 4/19/24 with diagnoses including Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage without loss of Consciousness, subsequent encounter and Unspecified Dementia ( is a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). Observation and interview on 04/30/24 at 12:04 PM revealed 1/2 bed rail up on right side; close to the window and 1/4 side rail up on left side of the bed. Resident #185 was not in the room. Interview with the DON revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers based on the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #183) whose record were reviewed for pressure ulcers. Nursing staff failed to apply a prevalon boot (designed with an open, floated-heel design which means the heel is completely floated. This provides continuous pressure relief) or offload Resident #183's left foot, on 4/30/24 and on 5/2/24, to prevent him from developing a pressure ulcer. This deficient practice could affect residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers and could contribute to developing avoidable pressure ulcers. The findings were: Review of Resident #183's face sheet, dated 5/2/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Nonromantic intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding within your skull), Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #183) reviewed for catheter care. CNA T lifted Resident #183's urine collection bag above the bladder during indwelling catheter care for Resident #183. This failure could place residents at risk for catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). The findings included: A record review of Resident #183's admission record dated 05/05/2024 revealed an admission date of 04/10/2024 with diagnoses which included retention of urine and urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #183's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #183 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care with needs for an indwelling catheter care. A record review of Resident #183's physicians' orders revealed Resident #183 was prescribed an indwelling urinary catheter with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys, for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed for drug security and 1 of 8 residents (Resident #62) reviewed for medications at the bedside. 1. On 05/03/2024 LVN W was assigned the 100-hall nurse medication cart when at 08:16 AM he left the medication cart unattended and unlocked. 2. On 04/30/2024 at 11:42 AM Resident #62 had her medicated eye drops and medicated nasal spray unsecured at her bedside. This failure could place residents at risk for misappropriation of property and could place residents at risk for accidents and hazards. The findings included: 1. During an observation and interview on 05/03/2024 at 08:16 AM revealed the 100-hall nurses' medication cart unlocked and unattended by room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] presented with the door closed. Observations of the 100-hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-05 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review revealed the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician's orders for 2 of 8 Residents (Resident #9 and #30) whose records were reviewed for lab services. 1. The facility failed to report to Resident #9's physician and document abnormal laboratory results on 02/16/2024 and again on 03/01/2024, to include low abnormal sodium blood serum levels to the physician. 2. The facility failed to report to Resident #30's physician and document abnormal laboratory results on 03/02/2024. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to resident's decline of health condition by not providing the physician information necessary to be informed decisions. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 05/01/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives, and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for 1 (Resident #70) of 25 residents reviewed, in that: Resident #70 had an intense dislike of cheese and was served a cheese omelet for breakfast. This deficient practice could lead to diminished quality of life and weight loss. The findings were: Record review of Resident #70's face sheet, dated 05/05/2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: UNSPECIFIED SEVERE PROTEIN-CALORIE MALNUTRITION, MUSCLE WASTING AND ATROPHY, and ANXIETY DISORDER. Record review of Resident #70's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #70's care plan, revised 04/08/2024, revealed a focus [Resident #70 is] at risk for nutritional deficits and/or dehydration risks r/t Chronic comorbidity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-05 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enact a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 1 (Resident #62) of 25 residents reviewed, in that: A bottle of prune juice which has been opened and was unrefrigerated, unlabeled, and undated was found on Resident #62's bedside table. This deficient practice could lead to illness due to foodborne pathogens. The findings were: Observation on 04/30/2024 at 11:42 a.m. of Resident #62's bedside table, revealed a bottle of prune juice which has been opened and was unrefrigerated, unlabeled with the resident's name, and undated. Further observation of the bottle revealed a manufacture's label which stated, Refrigerate after opening. During an interview with Resident #62, at the same time as the observation, Resident #62 stated that she drinks prune juice to alleviate constipation. The resident stated that her niece brings it to her and confirmed that she does not have a refrigerator and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for reporting. 1. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) allegations of neglect resulting in serious bodily injury during an incident involving Resident #1 on 2/4/24 within the specified timeframe. 2. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) allegations of neglect resulting in serious bodily injury during in incident involving Resident #2 on 3/4/24 within the specified timeframe. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential neglect due to unreported allegations of neglect. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 3/20/24, revealed the resident was initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. There were two 5-lb. containers of commercially prepared salads in the walk-in cooler that were past their use-by dates. 2. There was an open bag of dry cereal in the dry storage room that was not stored in a closed or tightly covered container. 3. The tabletop can opener blade, bar, and base were covered in sticky black and brown grime. 4. [NAME] C wore a wristwatch on her arm while preparing food in the kitchen. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 03/21/2023 at 10:35 a.m. in the walk-in cooler revealed there was one 5 lb. container of commercially prepared tuna salad and one 5 lb. container of smoked chicken salad. Both containers were half full, and both containers were labeled 3/06/2023. There was no use by date on either container. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to accurately reflect the resident's status on the MDS assessment for one resident (#16) of 8 residents reviewed for MDS assessments in that: Resident #16 was admitted with a cardiac pacemaker and it was not reflected on his MDS assessment. This deficient practice could affect residents with active healthcare devices and could result in equipment malfunction and heart failure. The findings were: Review of Resident #16's electronic face sheet dated 03/22/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of closed fracture (when bone breaks and no puncture or open wound in the skin), pain in left hip (discomfort in left hip), and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (disease of the heart characterized by irregular and often faster heartbeat). Review of Resident #16's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he did not have cardiac pacemaker listed under active diagnoses. He scored a 15/15 on his BIMS which indicated he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assure that residents receive a therapeutic diet as prescribed by the physician for one resident (#36) of 8 residents reviewed for diets in that: Resident #36 was prescribed a renal diet (A renal diet is one that is low in sodium, phosphorous, and protein. A renal diet also emphasizes the importance of consuming high-quality protein and usually limiting fluids. Some patients may also need to limit potassium and calcium) and was provided a regular diet which did not meet his special dietary needs and was provided a regular diet. This deficient practice could affect residents who are prescribed renal diets and could result in potassium building up in the blood stream and could result in a heart attack. The findings were: Review of Resident #36's electronic face sheet dated 03/22/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one resident (#63) out of 6 residents observed for medication pass in that: LVN A put her bare finger in the medication cup and carried the cup back and forth up and down the hall twice with her hands over the rim of the cup prior to giving Resident #63 her medications. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive medications and could result in cross contamination and the spread of infection. The findings were: Review of Resident #63's electronic face sheet dated 03/22/2023 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that gets worse over time), atherosclerosis of aorta (condition where arteries become narrowed and hardened due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FROST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 05/23/2024 |
| APOLINAR, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/01/2015 |
| TOUCHSTONE STRATEGIES - BULVERDE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| CAMPBELL, LESLIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2020 |
| CASTILLO, LYNNEA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| CLAYTON, JONATHON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| DENTINO, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| HACKETT, EDWARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| PRADO, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/28/2024 |
| SEHLKE, BRYON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| ZUROVEC, DARRELL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| AEGIS THERAPIES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| ALAMO ADVISORS LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| CARVAJAL PHARMACY LTC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| NUTRITIOUS LIFESTYLES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| PLANTE & MORAN PLLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| THE BRYON AND RENA SEHLKE LIVING TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| TOUCHSTONE COMMUNITIES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| TOUCHSTONE REALTY - BULVERDE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| TRIDENT HEALTH SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| FELLBAUM, ERNEST | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
| STUDER, STANLEY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676418. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.