No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ahc Of Lakewood, LLC

11155 W 15th Pl, Lakewood, CO 80215 · For profit - Corporation · 36 certified beds · (720) 866-8400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (720) 866-8400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
$53,615 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • the CMS record shows $53,615 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-06)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1701 Kipling St · (303) 238-0545 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1555 Quail St · (303) 233-1001 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1555 Quail St · (303) 233-1511 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%20.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.8%12.1%12.0%worse

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

74.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 401 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

74.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.52hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.64hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 224 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF74.1%CMS range 70.1–77.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 8.0–12.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.5–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.82
RN hoursweekends
61.9%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 33.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.46 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.17 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.84 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.72 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#8) of five residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of 35 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #8's blood sugar levels were being monitored consistently per physician's orders; and,-Ensure the physician was notified, per physician's orders, when Resident #8's blood sugar levels were out of range.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Blood Glucose Testing policy and procedure, dated 9/11/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/23/26 at 12:53 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Blood glucose testing will be performed by a licensed nurse or nursing assistant per physician order. Appropriate infection control practices will be utilized by staff when performing blood glucose. Knock and gain permission before entering the resident's room. Verify the identity of the resident. Identify yourself and ask the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent (%).Specifically the facility's medication error rate was 6.5%, or three errors out of 31 opportunities.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Administration of Medication policy and procedure, dated 5/5/26, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/23/26 at 12:53 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Licensed personnel, in accordance with professional standards of practice, will appropriately administer prescribed medications. Compare the prescription label to the order on the electronic medication administration record (eMAR). Verify the six medication administration rights: right patient, right drug, right dose, right dosage form, right route, right time.II. ObservationsOn 3/18/26 at approximately 8:20 a.m. licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 was preparing to administer a lidocaine (topical medication used to treat pain) 4% patch to Resident #19. Review of Resident #19's March 2026 computerized physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records for one (#45) of two residents reviewed out of 35 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the administration of Resident #45's as needed (PRN) hydromorphone (opioid analgesic used to treat moderate-to-severe pain when other options are inadequate) on 3/12/26 and 3/13/26 was documented in the resident's electronic medication administration record (eMAR).Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Administration of Medication policy, updated 5/5/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/23/26 at 1:59 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Licensed personnel, in accordance with professional standards of practice, will appropriately administer prescribed medications. Identify each resident before administering any medication. Use picture identification located in the resident's eMAR and/or verify by asking the resident to state his/her full name,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a facility assessment which included the use of an electronic elopement prevention system, dialysis services and hospice services. Findings include: I. Record review The facility assessment was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/19/23 at 11:27 a.m. The facility assessment was last reviewed on 10/17/23 by the NHA, director of nurses (DON) and the interdisciplinary team (IDT). The facility assessment failed to include the following: -The facility had an electronic elopement prevention system. -The facility offered contracted dialysis and hospice services. II. Interview The NHA was interviewed on 12/19/23 at 11:41 a.m. He said he was not aware the services identified were not included in the facility assessment. He said the facility assessment should be a reflection of all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and must provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for three of five certified nurse aides (CNAs) reviewed. Specifically, the facility had not provided inservice education based on the outcome of the performance reviews for CNA #1, #2 and #4. Findings include: I. Record review CNA #1 (hired 8/10/22) had a performance review on 11/10/23. CNA #2 (hired 8/10/22) had a performance review on 11/11/23. CNA #4 (hired 8/10/22) had a performance review on 8/10/23. -The CNAs did not have an inservice education plan based on the outcome of the review. II. Interview The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 12/21/23 at 9:45 a.m. She said the facility had completed the annual performance reviews, but was not aware the performance reviews needed to develop regular inservice education based on the outcome of the performance reviews. She said the facility would develop a plan to complete the performance reviews going…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident choices for two (#22 and #94) of three residents reviewed for showers out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #22 and Resident #94 received two showers a week and identified on the baseline care plan. Findings include: I. Resident #22 A. Resident status Resident #22, age over 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease and type II diabetes mellitus. The 12/9/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had intact cognition with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. She had no behaviors or rejections of care. The assessment identified dialysis care. B. Record review The care plan, initiated 12/18/23, identified ADL functional status and rehabilitation potential. Interventions included staff to assist with showers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care for one (#22) of three residents out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for Resident #22 that included dialysis care and services. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Baseline Person Centered Care Plan policy, revised 9/11/23, provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 12/21/23 at 9:02 a.m. included: The baseline person centered care plan is developed during the admission process to direct patient care prior to the development of the comprehensive care plan. The baseline person centered care plan is written to include care to be given, goals to be accomplished, and actions necessary to attain the goals. This form covers the basic information utilized to disseminate information to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge plan for one (#242) resident reviewed for discharge planning out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the discharge planning process was developed, communicated and documented in Resident #242's medical records. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #242, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2023 computerized physician order (CPO), diagnoses included hypertension, cellulitis (skin infection) of right arm, spondylosis (abnormal wear on the cartilage and bones of the neck), heart disease with heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, anemia, depression, insomnia, weakness and fall. The 12/13/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15. The resident required limited one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#242) of five residents reviewed for medication errors of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #242 was administered the correct dose of insulin by properly priming the insulin pen before insulin administration. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Lantus (glargine) manufacturer guidelines, updated 2022, retrieved from https://www.lantus.com/dam/jcr:817aed9c-a677-4cd6-a6b3-d93d8aba629a/lantus-solostar-pen-guide.pdf on 12/28/23 included the following recommendations, Perform a safety test. Dial a test dose of two units. Hold the pen with the needle pointing up and lightly tap the insulin reservoir so the air bubbles rise to the top of the needle. This will help you get the most accurate dose. Press the injection button all the way in and check to see that insulin comes out of the needle. The dial will automatically go back to zero after you perform the test. If no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection in one out of one units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure an intravenous (IV) administration set was stored in a sanitary manner; and, -Ensure the hub of an insulin pen was cleaned off prior to the administration of insulin Findings include: I. Professional reference [NAME], J., [NAME]. B. (August 2022). Enhancing Peripheral Line Maintenance Practices Among Nurses in a Critical Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Project. University of New Hampshire. https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1700&context=honors, retrieved on 1/2/24. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) has identified that there are two common practices that continue to put patients at risk for infection including 1) failure to place a sterile cap on the end of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$53,615 in federal fines across 12 penalties.

  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $3,846 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTH CARE — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 25 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.8★, per CMS)
3 of 5Advanced Health Care Of CincinnatiCincinnati, OH 3 of 5Aspen Transitional RehabilitationMeridian, ID 4 of 5Advanced Health Care Of SummerlinLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ahc Of Landerhaven LLCMayfield Heights, OH 5 of 5Advance Health Care Of ScottsdaleScottsdale, AZ 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of AuroraAurora, CO 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of Colorado SpringsColorado Springs, CO 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of GlendaleGlendale, AZ 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of HanoverBethlehem, PA 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of HendersonLas Vegas, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of Las VegasLas Vegas, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of ParadiseLas Vegas, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of RenoReno, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of AlbuquerqueAlbuquerque, NM 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of SacramentoSacramento, CA 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of SalemSalem, UT 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of St. GeorgeSt. George, UT 5 of 5Advanced Healthcare Of MesaMesa, AZ 5 of 5Aspen Ridge Transitional RehabMurray, UT 5 of 5Aspen Ridge West Transitional RehabMurray, UT 5 of 5Aspen Ridge of Utah ValleyOrem, UT 5 of 5Pine View Transitional RehabSouth Ogden, UTNot ratedAdvanced Health Care Of NashvilleNashville, TN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • THE BRYAN MILLER UTAH DYNASTY TRUST DATED APRIL 22, 2014 — REIT · 3.80% share · Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NEW AHC HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2021
THE GAIL MILLER GST TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST72%since 01/01/2024
THE BRYAN MILLER UTAH DYNASTY TRUST DATED APRIL 22, 2014OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2024
THE G&H MILLER UTAH TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2019OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2024
OXNAM, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
BARNES, DEBORAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2024
LHMSH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
WAINTRUB, MAURICIOIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$764K
Related-party expense10% of expenses

This home reported $764K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$783per resident / day
operating cost
$23,812per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$668per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065435. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next