Advanced Health Care Of Overland Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

72.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 527 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 287 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 38.0 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.18 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.78 to 1.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to identify hazards and implement adequate supervision and care to ensure safe smoking for Resident (R) 1. R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 01:00 PM. R1 was alert and oriented to person place time and situation and received oxygen via nasal cannula at six liters per minute (LPM). At 05:15 PM on 12/08/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M took R1 outside for a cigarette break while R1 wore his oxygen. CNA M locked R1's wheelchair brakes and went back inside. Between 05:26 PM and 05:29 PM, R1 lit his cigarette. Around 05:34 PM R1's nasal cannula ignited. R1 removed the nasal cannula, shook it, and attempted to put out the flame. At approximately 05:35 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H approached the facility for her scheduled shift. LN H observed R1 swinging the nasal cannula tubing around and trying to put out the fire. LN H…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included six residents with three residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to submit completed investigations within the required five working-day timeframe following reported allegations to the State Agency (SA) for Residents (R) 1 and R2. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home on [DATE]. R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the facility's notifications to the State Agency (SA) revealed the following: The facility reported intake number 2715968 to the SA on 01/13/26. The intake documented on 01/12/26 at 03:00 PM. The facility received an email from R1's representative that on 01/12/26 between the hours of 02:00 AM and 03:00 AM, R1 put on her call light to request urgent medical assistance, and staff failed to respond in a timely manner. As a result, R1 remained unattended while in acute physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included six residents with three residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a complete investigation to rule out abuse and neglect after receiving allegations from representatives for Resident (R) 1 and R2. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home on [DATE]. R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the facility's notifications to the State Agency (SA) revealed the following: The facility reported intake number 2715968 to the SA on 01/13/26. The intake documented on 01/12/26 at 03:00 PM. The facility received an email from R1's representative that on 01/12/26 between the hours of 02:00 AM and 03:00 AM, R1 put on her call light to request urgent medical assistance, and staff failed to respond in a timely manner. As a result, R1 remained unattended while in acute physical distress and R1 told her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 35 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to food storage. This deficient practice placed the residents who received food from the facility kitchen at risk related to food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings included: - On 09/23/24 at 07:27 AM, an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one container of pistachios. The container was not labeled and lacked a date. On 09/23/24 at 07:31 AM, an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one opened box of puree pasta mix. The box had an opened bag inside that contained the pasta mix. The box and bag lacked a date. On 09/23/24 at 07:33 AM, an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one opened box of honey wheat flavoring. The box had an opened bag inside that contained the honey wheat flavoring. The box and bag lacked a date. On 09/23/24 at 07:35 AM, an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a policy that prohibited and prevented the facility from employing or engaging staff with criminal backgrounds when the facility failed to conduct a background check as required for one employee and the facility policy allowed for 10 days of employment prior to the check. The deficient practice placed all residents at risk for abuse, neglect, misappropriation, or mistreatment. Findings included: - Employee review of Licensed Nurse (LN) H revealed a hire date of 07/03/19. The facility was unable to provide evidence a criminal background check had been completed by the facility for LN H upon request. On 09/25/24 at 11:55 AM Administrative Staff A stated the facility did not have a criminal background check on file for LN H. Administrative Staff A stated he was unable to find LN H's background check after searching through the older files in storage. Administrative Staff A stated LN H was originally hired for home health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from hazardous chemicals and materials for eight cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 09/23/24 at 07:30 AM a walkthrough of the facility's Two Hall revealed an unlocked wound treatment cart. The cart contained multiple bottles of medicated diclofenac (used to treat pain) and nystatin (used to treat fungal infections) ointments with the warning of Keep medication out of reach of children. The cart also contained three purple containers of Sani-Cloth bleach wipes with the Keep out of reach from children warning label. CNA M stated the cart belonged to the nurse but secured it. On 09/24/24 at 07:10 AM an inspection of the facility's One Hall revealed the wound cart was unsecured. The cart contained five bottles of diclofenac, a box of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 75 had her call light to communicate her needs or call for help. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs. Findings Including: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R75's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of fracture of her sacrum (bone break of the large triangular bone/area between the two hip bones), fracture of the lumber vertebra (spinal fracture of the lower back), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), and history of repeated falls. R75's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 09/20/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she required supervision with bed mobility, toileting, transfers, personal hygiene, dressing, and personal hygiene. The MDS noted no falls since her admission. R75's Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices review. Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)82 with a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS -10095 Form upon discharge from Medicare A services. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for uninformed decisions and inability to exercise her rights. Findings Included: - R82's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/30/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated she was discharged home and was not anticipated to return to the facility. A review of R82's Beneficiary Protection Notification Review completed on 09/24/24 indicated she started Medicare Part A skilled services on 07/08/24. The form designated her last covered day (LCD) as 08/29/24. The form indicated the facility initiated her discharge from skilled with benefit days remaining and she left the facility upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for Residents (R)18. This deficient practice placed R16 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and other complications. Findings Including: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R18's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the pancreas (pancreatic cancer), nausea with vomiting, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD-backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus). R18's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 09/08/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated she required supervision and/or touch assistance from staff for bathing, toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS indicated she admitted with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for bowel and bladder management. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) care for Resident (R)16 when staff failed to maintain the urine collection bag below R16's bladder to encourage dependent drainage. This deficient practice placed R16 at risk for catheter-related complications including urinary tract infections (UTI). Findings Including: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R16's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/23/24 noted a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for nutritive diets. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a palatable, safe, and appetizing temperature for Residents (R)75 and R76. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired nutrition and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - On 09/23/24 at 07:45 AM R75 stated the facility would often serve the food cold in the mornings. She stated staff were available to warm up the food in the microwaves if asked. On 09/23/24 at 08:00 AM R76 stated breakfast often was served cold by the time it reached her room. On 09/23/24 at 12:51 PM, R18 stated the meals were often cold by the time the food was delivered to the rooms. She stated she was told by staff she would have to eat in the cafeteria if she wanted her meals to be served hot. (R18 was sent out to an acute care facility at 04:30 PM on 09/23/24) On 09/24/24 at 08:20 AM R75 received her breakfast tray. A temperature test was completed on her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,397 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,397 — penalty dated 2023-12-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTH CARE — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $995K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS