No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Advanced Health Care Of Las Vegas

5840 W Sunset Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89118 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 38 certified beds · (702) 967-6100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (702) 967-6100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 10 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6276 S Rainbow Blvd · (702) 220-5557 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5888 W Sunset Rd · (702) 889-8274 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7835 S Rainbow Blvd # 11-12 · (702) 302-4466 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7355 Rogers St · (702) 455-8200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5780 W Sunset Rd · (702) 948-7755

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%80.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%23.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.6%9.6%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 481 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.75hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.56hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 204 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.6%CMS range 58.0–65.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 10.5–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 4.4–8.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.65
RN hoursweekends
21.4%
Total nursing turnover
19.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 37.4 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.36 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.08 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.42 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.65 to 1.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for 1:1 meal assistance was followed for 1 of 12 residents (Resident 30). The deficient practice had the potential to put the resident at risk for weight loss and aspiration.Findings include:Resident 30 (R30)R30 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including encephalopathy, dementia, sepsis, and urinary tract infection.On 01/13/2026 at 9:19 AM, R30 was observed sitting upright in bed with a sign posted on the wall above the bed that read 1:1 ASSIST WITH FEEDING. On 01/13/2026 at 12:20 PM, R30 was observed lying supine in bed, eyes closed with lunch tray on the bedside table.On 01/13/2026 at 2:05 PM, R30 was observed lying supine in bed, lunch tray was observed on the bedside table with approximately 30% meal gone.On 01/14/2026 at 12:54 PM, R30 was observed sitting upright in a wheelchair in front of an overbed table. The overbed table had a lunch tray with about 10% of the meal consumed. R30 stated no one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated once removed from original packaging, food items were labeled with acceptable discard dates, damaged items were not mixed in with the stock items, and spray bottles containing chemicals were labeled. The deficient practice had the potential for exposing residents to expired perishable food items and compromise safety of residents and staff.Findings include:On 07/13/2026 at 7:41 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with the Registered Dietitian (RD) the following issues were observed: Two clear plastic bags in the walk-in freezer contained unknown food items without labels to identify contents or indicate the date placed in bag.In the refrigerator, a container of marinara sauce was labeled with an open date of 01/06/2026 and use by date of 06/26/2026. In the cleaning supply room, an unlabeled spray bottle of blue colored liquid.In the dry storage room, a dented can of cranberry sauce with undamaged cans. On 01/13/2026 at 8:05 AM, the RD explained the food items should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders to obtain daily weights for residents with congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart could not pump blood efficiently causing fluid to collect in lungs and legs) were followed for 3 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 2, 6 and 140). The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for a delay in identification of fluid overload and provision of timely interventions. Findings include: Resident 2 (R2) R2 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and pneumonia (fluid in lungs). On 01/07/2025 in the morning, R2 laid awake in bed receiving two liters of humidified Oxygen by nasal cannula. R2 wore bilateral compression stockings and appeared weak as R2 spoke slowly and softly. R2 indicated having difficulty breathing and indicated being treated for pneumonia in the hospital. A physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for pain medications were followed for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 6). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for inadequate pain control. Findings include: Resident 6 (R6) R6 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and pain in left hip. On 01/07/2025 in the morning, R6 laid in bed covered in blanket, a left boot device was observed in the room. R6 indicated being in the facility for two months after falling at home and although R6 did not sustain a fracture from the fall, the resident verbalized being diagnosed with osteoarthritis more severe in left leg causing the resident chronic pain. A History and Physical dated 11/18/2024, documented R6 had a mechanical fall at home landing on left hip. R6 has had difficulty walking on left leg since the fall and complained of hip pain. A care plan for pain management initiated 11/18/2024, documented interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications, specifically, a PRN (as needed) pain medication order was not given earlier than scheduled for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 6). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for side effects of opioids to include constipation and dependence. Findings include: The Unnecessary Medications policy (undated) documented each resident's drug regimen would remain free from unnecessary drugs which shall not be given in excessive doses and ordered by the attending physician. R6 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and pain in left hip. On 01/07/2025 in the morning, R6 laid in bed covered in blanket, a left boot device was observed in the room. R6 indicated being in the facility for two months after falling at home and although R6 did not sustain a fracture from the fall, the resident verbalized being diagnosed with osteoarthritis more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) infection event forms were being initiated and/or completed and discussions between nursing staff and prescribers were documented regarding adherence to the McGeer criteria for antibiotic orders (a set of guidelines used to determine if a patient has an infection which may need antibiotics) for 4 of 12 sampled residents (Residents and 87, 146, 149 and 5) and; 2) prescribers were being provided education regarding the facility's antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) on an annual basis and as needed in accordance with the facility's ASP policy. The deficient practice placed residents at risk for antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects of antibiotics. Findings include: The Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy and procedure (undated), documented the ASP was designed to improve the use of antibiotics to improve outcomes for patients with infectious disease, prevent antimicrobial resistance, and prevent adverse events…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the discontinued intravenous (IV) fluids and expired suppositories were removed from the active supply and discarded. The deficient practice had the potential for adverse reactions and compromised the effectiveness of treatments. Findings include: On 01/18/2024 at 8:30 AM, an inspection was conducted in the medication room with the Clinical Nurse Manager (CNM). Three bags of discontinued IV fluids belonging to three unsampled residents were stored together in the active supply. The CNM indicated the IV fluids were discontinued following residents discharge as follows: - Two bags of 0.9 sodium chloride (one (1) liter per bag). - 1 bag of 5% Dextrose, 1 liter The medication refrigerator stored expired Acetaminophen 650 milligrams (mg) suppositories with an expiration date of 12/2023 as follows: - 4 unopened boxes (12 suppositories/box) -11 suppositories in an open box. On 01/18/2024 at 8:40 AM, the CNM confirmed the Acetaminophen suppositories were expired and should have been removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure expired meal products were disposed, failed to ensure ready to use raw meat was properly stored, and failed to ensure dishwasher machine attained an acceptable sanitizing temperature. The failure had the potential to place all residents at risk to contract food-related illnesses. Findings included: On 01/17/2024 in the morning, an inspection of the kitchen was conducted with a cook. The following issues were observed: Small refrigerator: 2- 1 gallon cartons of soy milk, expired 01/14/2024. 1 - 1/2 gallon carton of buttermilk, expired 01/10/2024. Walk-in refrigerator: Raw thawed ground beef and a thawed chicken packet were stored in same tray. There was leakage from the ground beef noted in the tray. Dry storage: A bag of chocolate chips was open to the air. Dishwasher: A high temperature dishwasher machine wash cycle temperature was 146 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and rinse cycle temperature was 117 degrees F. On 01/17/2024 at 8:30 AM, the cook confirmed the observations and acknowledged expired meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the provider was notified of the resident's persistent refusal of the blood pressure medication and when medication was held for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #138). The deficient practice had the potential to result in unmanaged hypotension, increased cardiovascular risks, and compromised overall health. Findings include: Resident 138 (R138) R138 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including joint replacement surgery, present of left artificial hip joint, polyneuropathy, and anxiety disorder. A Physician order dated 08/16/2023, documented a Midodrine tablet of 5 mg to be administered by mouth three times (x) a day for hypotension. Hold if systolic blood pressure (SBP) is greater than 110. A Care Plan dated 08/16/2024, documented R138 was at risk for an alteration in cardiac function related to hypotension (low blood pressure). The Administration History from 08/19/2023-08/21/2023, documented the Midodrine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the medication was delivered as ordered or communicated for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident 97). The deficient practice could have potentially led to ineffective treatment, non-healing of medical conditions, and delayed recovery. Findings include: Resident 97 (R97) R97 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis and spinal stenosis. A physician order dated 01/16/2024, documented a Super B complex capsule to be administered daily by mouth as a supplement. On 01/18/2024 at 7:40 AM, during medication pass, a Registered Nurse (RN) prepared R97's medications except the Super B complex. An RN explained the Super B complex was not available since it was ordered on 01/16/2024, as the pharmacy had not delivered the medication. An RN demonstrated the ordering process through the computer system, which was accessible and linked to the pharmacy. The Medications Administration History from 01/17/2024 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTH CARE — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 25 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.8★, per CMS)
3 of 5Advanced Health Care Of CincinnatiCincinnati, OH 3 of 5Aspen Transitional RehabilitationMeridian, ID 4 of 5Advanced Health Care Of SummerlinLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ahc Of Landerhaven LLCMayfield Heights, OH 5 of 5Advance Health Care Of ScottsdaleScottsdale, AZ 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of AuroraAurora, CO 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of Colorado SpringsColorado Springs, CO 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of GlendaleGlendale, AZ 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of HanoverBethlehem, PA 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of HendersonLas Vegas, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of ParadiseLas Vegas, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of RenoReno, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of AlbuquerqueAlbuquerque, NM 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of SacramentoSacramento, CA 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of SalemSalem, UT 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of St. GeorgeSt. George, UT 5 of 5Advanced Healthcare Of MesaMesa, AZ 5 of 5Ahc Of Lakewood, LLCLakewood, CO 5 of 5Aspen Ridge Transitional RehabMurray, UT 5 of 5Aspen Ridge West Transitional RehabMurray, UT 5 of 5Aspen Ridge of Utah ValleyOrem, UT 5 of 5Pine View Transitional RehabSouth Ogden, UTNot ratedAdvanced Health Care Of NashvilleNashville, TN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NEW AHC HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2021
THE GAIL MILLER GST TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST72%since 01/01/2024
ADVANCED HEALTH CARE - LARRY H MILLER CORPORATIONOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2021
THE BRYAN MILLER UTAH DYNASTY TRUST DATED APRIL 22, 2014OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2024
THE G&H MILLER UTAH TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2019OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2024
OXNAM, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JEWETT, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2025
ABACUS RX INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LHMSH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
S&S NUTRITION NETWORK INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+15.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$622K
Related-party expense7% of expenses

This home reported $622K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$660per resident / day
operating cost
$20,068per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$784per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295090. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next