Advanced Health Care of St. George

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

75.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 632 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 343 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 43.4 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.12 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.00 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.02 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, and included the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, for 3 out of 22 sampled residents, five opened insulin injector pens were not labeled with open dates or a discard date, and they were in the medication cart available for resident use. Resident identifiers: 104, 107, and 109. Findings included: On 5/14/25 at 9:29 AM, an observation was conducted of the Hall 3 medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. There were five insulin injector pens in the medication cart that were not labeled with an open date or a discard date. LPN 1 stated that she would date the insulin on the lids with an open date when they were opened and she thought the insulin was good for 30 days after opening. 1. Resident 104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, for 1 out of 22 sampled residents, a resident taking an anticoagulant medication received two doses in error on one day. Resident identifier: 109. Findings included: Resident 109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, persistent atrial fibrillation and long term use of anticoagulants. On 5/12/25 at 3:50 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 109. Resident 109 stated the facility International Normalized Ratio (INR) machines did not work. Resident 109 stated the nurse went through three machines the other day before she could get a reading. Resident 109 stated he was not sure if it was the test strips or the machines. Resident 109's medical record was reviewed. A physician's order dated 5/9/25, documented warfarin 3 milligrams (mg) once a day. The physician's order was dated to start on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not obtain laboratory (lab) services only when ordered by a physician; physician assistant; nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist. Specifically, for 1 out of 22 sampled residents, a resident had a basic metabolic panel (BMP) and complete blood count (CBC) collected without a physician's order. Resident identifier: 15. Findings included: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, sepsis due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, pneumonia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, systolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and anemia. Resident 15's medical record was reviewed. An interim lab report was located within resident 15's medical record. A BMP and CBC were collected on 4/20/25 at 7:15 PM. A physician's order for the BMP and CBC were unable to be located. On 5/14/25 at 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Specifically, for 1 out of 22 sampled residents, a nurse did not perform hand hygiene, assisted a pill with their bare finger from the medication bottle to the medication cup, and administered the medications to a resident. Resident identifier: 97. Findings included: On 5/14/25 at 7:56 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 was observed to prepare and administer medications to resident 97. LPN 2 was observed to assist a pill with their bare finger from the medication bottle to the medication cup with the other prepared medications. LPN 2 was observed to administer the medications to resident 97. LPN 2 was observed to prepare two resident's medications prior to resident 97 and LPN 2 was observed to not perform hand hygiene before or after the medication administrations. On 5/14/25 at 9:22 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN 2. LPN 2 stated that she would try to hand sanitize as she left the resident room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not consult with the resident's physician and notify when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status or a need to alter treatment. Specifically, the resident had elevated blood sugar levels while waiting for the arrival of their insulin pen and the physician was not notified. Resident identifier 77. Findings included: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), morbid obesity, postprocedural seroma of skin, urinary tract infection, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, depression, hypertension, repeated falls, and long term use of insulin. On 6/27/23, resident 77's medical records were reviewed. Review of resident 77's physician orders revealed the following: a. Tresiba FlexTouch insulin pen, inject 12 units subcutaneously one time a day. Special Instructions: Diagnosis: DM Pt own supply.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, a resident with elevated Blood Glucose (BG) levels did not receive their insulin injection for 4 days after admission. Additionally, the same resident experienced constipation and did not have the bowel protocol orders administered per the standing orders for constipation. Resident identifier 77. Findings included: Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), morbid obesity, postprocedural seroma of skin, urinary tract infection, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, depression, hypertension, repeated falls, and long term use of insulin. On 6/27/23, resident 77's medical records were reviewed. 1. On 6/27/23 at 9:23 AM, an interview was conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, medications were not administered to a resident due to being unavailable. Resident identifier 15. Findings included: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, acute bronchitis, acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, hypotension, a-fib, thrombophilia, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, dementia, and back pain. On 6/28/23 resident 15's medical records were reviewed. Review of resident 15's physician orders revealed the following: a. Allopurinol tablet 300 milligram (mg), give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for gout. The order was initiated on 6/9/23. b. Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) capsule 25 mcg (micrograms) (1,000 unit), give 2 capsules (50 mcg) by mouth at bedtime. The order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that for 1 of 23 sampled residents the facility did not ensure that its residents were free of any significant medication errors. Specifically, a resident was given an opioid in conjunction with a medication which had orders to not administer with an opioid. Resident identifier: 181. Findings included: 1. Resident 181 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of superior rim of left pubis, chronic kidney disease stage 3b, elevated white blood cell count, panic disorder, depression, insomnia, constipation, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, weakness, and history of falling. On 6/27/23 at 8:45 AM, an interview with resident 181 was conducted. Resident 181 stated that she was upset about the management of her medications. Resident 181 stated that she takes a pain medication and a muscle relaxer. Resident 181 stated that some nurses had given her the pain medication and muscle relaxer at the same time, while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTH CARE — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $405K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT