No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Advanced Health Care Of Reno

961 Kuenzli Street, Reno, NV 89502 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 42 certified beds · (775) 470-7200 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (775) 470-7200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 18 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
21 Locust St · (775) 982-5000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
21 Locust St · (775) 982-5280 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
709 E 2nd St · (775) 348-8338 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Downtown Reno Truckee River Trail · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine60.0%80.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.6%23.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.4%9.6%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

73.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 647 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

73.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.54hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.58hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 324 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF73.7%CMS range 70.1–76.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.7–11.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.7–8.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.89
RN hoursweekends
40.8%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 41.8 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.46 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.82 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.47 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.69 to 0.89 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-20)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Baseline Care Plan for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #30) included monitoring and care instructions for an indwelling drainage tube. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident not receiving the care and services necessary to manage the drainage device. Findings include: Resident #30 Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system - cholecystostomy and calculus of gallbladder with other cholecystitis without obstruction. On 11/17/2025 at 2:17 PM, Resident #30 had a drainage bag sitting next to the resident, on the resident's chair. The tubing drain insertion site appeared to be in the resident's right upper quadrant (RUQ) and the drainage bag contained a small amount of dark brown/green drainage. The resident was not aware of what the drainage bag was for. A hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan included a care plan for the monitoring and care of an indwelling drainage tube for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident # 30), and for the administration and monitoring of insulin for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #9). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents not receiving the care and services necessary to manage the affected care areas. Findings include: Resident #30Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system - cholecystostomy and calculus of gallbladder with other cholecystitis without obstruction. On 11/17/2025 at 2:17 PM, Resident #30 had a drainage bag sitting next to the resident, on the resident's chair. The tubing drain insertion site appeared to be in the resident's right upper quadrant (RUQ) and the drainage bag contained a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a timely manner resulting in a medication error rate of 12%. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents not receiving medications as prescribed, potentially compromising the effectiveness of treatment, and placing residents at risk for adverse health outcomes.Findings include: Resident #40Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Parkinson disease without dyskinesia, without mention of fluctuations, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, and multiple myeloma in remission. A Physician Order dated 11/04/2025, documented Carbidopa-levodopa 25-250 milligrams (mg) tablets, administer 3.75-375 mg by mouth four times per day. The morning dose was to be administered between 7:00 AM and 8:00 AM. A Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored according to the manufacturer's instructions in 1 of 2 inspected medication carts and failed to ensure medications were not left unattended on top of a medication cart. This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication contamination, diversion, or administration errors, placing residents at risk for receiving compromised or incorrect medications.Findings include: Storage of Medication On 11/19/2025 at 4:05 PM, during an inspection of the Hall Two medication cart with the Regional Nurse, a 30-milliliter (ml) bottle of lorazepam 2 milligrams (mg)/ml, with approximately 29 ml of liquid remaining in the bottle, was located in a drawer of the medication cart. A Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed lorazepam was traditionally stored in the medication carts and was not stored in a refrigerator after being opened. The manufacturer's label on the bottle of lorazepam instructed to store the medication at a temperature between 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the thermometer used to take temperatures of food in holding trays was disinfected and sanitized between uses for each food item. The deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to foodborne illnesses due to cross-contamination.Findings include: On 11/19/2025 at 11:26 AM, the [NAME] was observed taking temperatures of the food to be served for lunch. However, the [NAME] did not clean and sanitize the thermometer between checking the temperature of each food to be served.On 11/19/2025 at 11:33 AM, the [NAME] explained the [NAME] takes temperatures of all food to be served to residents in the facility and in between taking temperatures of each food, the thermometer was to be disinfected and sanitized to prevent cross contamination of food. The [NAME] confirmed not disinfecting and sanitizing the thermometer in between taking temperatures of various foods to be served to residents and explained the [NAME] was trying to take temperatures quickly in the kitchen because of the survey in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nursing services were provided in accordance with the facility's own assessment of resident needs and resources. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the delivery of care and services by direct care staff to the entire facility census, potentially compromising residents' health, safety and well-being. Findings include:A Facility Assessment (FA) reviewed with the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Team dated 01/16/2025, documented the facility provided for resident support/care needs and considered both the census and acuity levels to staff the facility accordingly.The FA documented the direct care staff would be allocated to a day, evening, and night shift. Direct care staff was identified as Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA).The Monday through Friday CNA staffing schedule was as follows:-Day Shift: 6:00 AM-2:00 PM= 5 CNAs, -Evening Shift: 2:00 PM-10:00 PM= 5 CNAs, -Night Shift: 10:00 PM-6:00 AM= 3 CNAsThe Saturday and Sunday CNA staffing schedule was as follows:-Day Shift:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain the drainage pipe under a handwashing sink in the kitchen, allowing water to leak onto the kitchen floor. The deficient practice had the potential to pose a safety risk to staff working in the kitchen.Findings include:On 11/17/2025 at 8:26 AM, a handwashing sink in the kitchen was leaking water from a drainage pipe while an individual was washing hands. There was a water puddle under the sink, on the kitchen floor. On the drainage pipe below the sink, the pipe had duct tape wrapped around the pipe.On 11/17/2025 at 8:30 AM, the Kitchen Manager confirmed the handwashing sink pipes were leaking water onto the kitchen floor and explained the sink had been leaking for at least a few days. The Kitchen Manager explained the Kitchen Manager duct taped the pipe in hopes of preventing the pipe from leaking further onto the kitchen floor. The Kitchen Manager verbalized informing the Maintenance Director of the leaking pipe upon discovery and communicated the issue verbally.On 11/18/2025 at 8:30 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended and unsecured in the dining room during a medication pass, creating a potential accident when a licensed nurse left the medications at a resident's table and walked away, resulting in the medications out of the nurse's line of sight for supervision for 12 of 12 residents in the dining room. Findings include: On 10/28/2024 at 12:08 PM, there were three residents seated at a table together awaiting lunch meal service. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) set a small cup containing a white pill inside of the cup on the residents' table. The LPN turned around and walked away from the table to retrieve a cup of water, leaving the unknown pill unsupervised and unsecured at the dining table. The LPN returned to the residents' table with the cup of water and the resident administered the medication. On 10/28/2024 at 12:12 PM, the LPN confirmed leaving the pill unsecured and unsupervised at the three residents' table, while nine other residents were also in the dining room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had an annual performance evaluation completed timely and identified and addressed areas of weakness for 3 of 3 sampled CNAs employed greater than one year, selected for personnel record review (Employee #21, #22, and #23). Findings include: Employee #21 Employee #21 was hired by the facility as a CNA with a start date of 01/16/2023. Employee #21's personnel record documented the following: - a facility Employee Performance Review dated 02/14/2024, one month late. - a facility Competency Checklist dated 01/25/2024, nine days late. The Competency Checklist lacked documented evidence of Employee #21's performance strengths or weaknesses. - a facility Follow-up Evaluation dated 02/12/2024, documented the areas of concern, including duties for trash, water, bed made and room clean prior to giving report. Employee #22 Employee #22 was hired by the facility as a CNA with a start date of 09/09/2021. Employee #22's personnel record documented the following: - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart and medications left on top of a medication cart were secured for 1 of 3 medication carts. Findings include: On 10/31/2024 at 7:10 AM, the top left drawer of a medication cart was left ajar and unlocked and three Lidocaine 5 percent (%) transdermal patches were on top of the cart and unsecured. A nurse was not at or near the cart and no other staff was present in the hallway. On 10/31/2024 at 7:14 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) returned to the medication cart and confirmed the top drawer was left ajar and unlocked, and three Lidocaine 5% transdermal patches were left on top of the medication cart. The LPN explained the LPN was administering medications to a resident and had left the Lidocaine patches on top of the cart and left the cart unsecured. The LPN verbalized the medication could have been taken and ingested by anyone in the hallway, including other residents, and could have resulted in an adverse reaction, overdose, or death. On 10/31/2024 at 7:48 AM, the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 8 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to 1) ensure all residents residing in the same hall were tested for Covid-19 (Covid) during a Covid outbreak, 2) ensure all staff in contact with a confirmed Covid positive resident were tested for Covid-19, 3) ensure staff were fit-tested for the use of N95 respirators prior to donning and in accordance with the facility's Covid Emergency Plan, and 4) ensure a resident's urinary catheter bag was not laying on the ground for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #350). The lack of Infection Control related to Covid had the potential to affect the 42 resident census. Findings include: Resident Covid Testing Resident #42 Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia, unspecified organism, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome of noninfectious origin without acute organ dysfunction. An antigen test result dated 11/16/23, documented Resident #42 was diagnosed as positive for Covid. Resident #249…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident maintained a dignified existence when a resident's catheter bag was visible with urine while the resident was in the dining room and communal area of facility for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #147). Findings include: Resident #147 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of retention of urine. On 11/27/23 at 11:28 AM, Resident #147 was in the resident's room. The resident's catheter bag exposed urine to sight, light yellow in color. The resident explained the covering of the catheter bag had come off and was on the resident's table. On 11/27/23 at 12:28 PM, the resident was in the dining room for lunch with no covering on the catheter bag for privacy, exposing the visual of urine to others in the dining room. On 11/29/23 at 11:35 AM, the resident was sitting in the resident's wheelchair outside of the dining room, in a communal area of the facility, with no covering on the catheter bag for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to modify interventions to prevent future injuries from falls for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #350). Findings include: Resident #350 Resident #350 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, supraventricular tachycardia unspecified, and need for assistance with personal care. A Baseline Person Centered Care Plan dated 11/17/23, documented a problem of alteration in mobility/safety. Approaches included bed in lowest position and frequent checks. An Fall Incident Report dated 11/26/23, documented an unwitnessed fall occurred on 11/26/23. The Mental Status section of the report documented the resident was confused more than normal. Immediate interventions for the fall included first aid and rest. A progress note dated 11/26/23, documented the resident was observed on the floor next to the resident's bed. The resident appeared more confused than normal with skin tear/abrasion to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter bag was kept off the floor while the resident was seated in a recliner for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #350). Findings include: Resident #350 Resident #350 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, supraventricular tachycardia, and need for assistance with personal care. A physician's order dated 11/17/23, documented to maintain indwelling catheter. Resident #350's care plan included an intervention to provide catheter care at least once each shift, start date 11/20/23. A nursing progress note dated 11/26/23, documented the resident complained of burning in the vaginal area. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) would attempt to collect urine sample to check for a urinary tract infection (UTI). A physician progress note dated 11/27/23, documented the resident was now with definite UTI. Urine was to be sent to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy per a physician's order and include dosage parameters on the physician's order for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #347). Findings include: Resident #347 Resident #347 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pulmonary fibrosis, unspecified, and pneumonia, unspecified organism. A physician's order dated 11/22/23, documented oxygen per nasal cannula (NC) to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) greater than 90%. Document liters per minute (LPM) every shift. May titrate/discontinue oxygen (O2) LPM as tolerated while maintaining SpO2 greater than 90%. Resident #347's Baseline Person Centered Care Plan documented a problem of alteration in cardiac or respiratory status. Approaches included oxygen as ordered. A nursing progress note dated 11/24/23, documented O2 on at ten liters via mask. A nursing progress note dated 11/25/23, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered with an error rate of less than five percent (%). There were 26 opportunities and five medication errors. The medication error rate was 19.23%. Findings include: Resident #353 Resident #353 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including displaced bicondylar fracture of right tibia, subsequent for closed fracture with routine healing and polyneuropathy, unspecified. On 11/29/23 at 8:21 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) began preparing to administer medications to Resident #353. Among the medications prepared were the following: -Gabapentin 300 milligram (mg), capsules. One capsule was placed in the medication cup for the resident. -Calcium 600 mg +vitamin D 5 micrograms (mcg), tablets. Two tablets were placed in the medication cup for the resident. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #353, dated 11/29/23, documented the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to remove expired laboratory's supplies from the medication storage rooms and ensure expired medications were removed from 2 of 3 sampled medication carts. Findings include: On 11/29/23 at 9:29 AM, the Medication Room was inspected with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. The following items were found: -99 vacutainer buffered sodium citrate blood collections tubes with an expiration date of 06/30/21. -82 vacutainer K2 EDTA (K2E) 7.2 milligram (mg) blood collection tubes with an expiration date of 01/22. -87 vacutainer SST blood collection tubes with an expiration date of 10/31/21. -1 vacutainer safety lok blood collections set for short term intravenous administration with an expiration date of 5/31/21. -1 safety glide insulin 1 milliliter (ml) 29-gauge (G) x 1/2 24, with an expiration date of 01/31/23. -24 needles 21 G 1-1/4 - with an expiration date of 04/30/23. -2 needles 22 1-1/4 - with an expiration date of 03/31/23. On 11/29/23 at 10:00 AM LPN1 confirmed the lab supplies were expired and needed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure clean dishes were handled in a sanitary manner after exiting the dishwasher. Findings include: On 11/27/23 at 9:25 AM, a Dietary Aide had gloved hands while washing dirty dishes. The Dietary Aide, with the same gloved hands, put away clean dishes from the dishwasher, pulled a clean tray of dishes out of the dishwasher, and put a dirty tray of dishes into the dishwasher. On 11/27/23 at 9:31 AM, the Dietary Aide, with the same gloved hands, loaded a tray of dirty dishes and moved promptly to putting away clean dishes, then moved from loading dirty trays to emptying the clean trays and removed the next clean tray from the dishwasher. On 11/27/23 at 9:33 AM, the Dietary Aide explained the Dietary Aide had been trained to change gloves when working with dirty dishes and moving to working with clean dishes. The Dietary Aide verbalized the aide had just realized the aide had not been changing gloves when working from dirty dishes to clean dishes. On 11/29/23 at 8:07 AM, the Nutrition Services Supervisor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVANCED HEALTH CARE — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 25 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.8★, per CMS)
3 of 5Advanced Health Care Of CincinnatiCincinnati, OH 3 of 5Aspen Transitional RehabilitationMeridian, ID 4 of 5Advanced Health Care Of SummerlinLas Vegas, NV 4 of 5Ahc Of Landerhaven LLCMayfield Heights, OH 5 of 5Advance Health Care Of ScottsdaleScottsdale, AZ 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of AuroraAurora, CO 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of Colorado SpringsColorado Springs, CO 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of GlendaleGlendale, AZ 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of HanoverBethlehem, PA 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of HendersonLas Vegas, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of Las VegasLas Vegas, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of Overland ParkOverland Park, KS 5 of 5Advanced Health Care Of ParadiseLas Vegas, NV 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of AlbuquerqueAlbuquerque, NM 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of Coeur d'AleneCoeur d'Alene, ID 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of SacramentoSacramento, CA 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of SalemSalem, UT 5 of 5Advanced Health Care of St. GeorgeSt. George, UT 5 of 5Advanced Healthcare Of MesaMesa, AZ 5 of 5Ahc Of Lakewood, LLCLakewood, CO 5 of 5Aspen Ridge Transitional RehabMurray, UT 5 of 5Aspen Ridge West Transitional RehabMurray, UT 5 of 5Aspen Ridge of Utah ValleyOrem, UT 5 of 5Pine View Transitional RehabSouth Ogden, UTNot ratedAdvanced Health Care Of NashvilleNashville, TN

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • THE G&H MILLER UTAH TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2019 — REIT · 2.50% share · Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NEW AHC HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2021
THE GAIL MILLER GST TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST72%since 01/01/2024
THE BRYAN MILLER UTAH DYNASTY TRUST DATED APRIL 22, 2014OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2024
THE G&H MILLER UTAH TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2019OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2024
OXNAM, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HOPKINS, DOUGLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
LHMSH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
MAUL, MARYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 70%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$599per resident / day
operating cost
$18,217per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$625per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Nevada Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295096. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next