No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Civita Care Center At Danbury

107 Osborne Street, Danbury, CT 06810 · For profit - Individual · 180 certified beds · (203) 792-8102 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$9,110 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,110 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-21)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
85 Osborne St · (203) 744-2799 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
95 Locust Ave · (203) 792-2044 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
213 White St · (203) 743-4433 · Call to confirm hours
Park
32 Patriot Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.3%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms29.7%22.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.8%16.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.4%17.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.5%24.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table42.7%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine47.3%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission44.0%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%10.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.272.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.291.461.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.4%CMS range 26.1–52.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.2–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 112.1 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-07)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to appropriately respond to an emergency situation in which a resident experienced a medical emergency, and failed to provide interventions when the resident was identified to be unresponsive and had a respiratory rate of three (3) breaths per minute, resulting in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of opioid dependence and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition and was independent with transfers and wheelchair mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 may go on Leave of Absence (LOA) with a wheelchair. Interventions directed independent LOA, and perform room search with consent.Physician order dated [DATE] directed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided the required assistance with a resident transfer which resulted in a fall with injuries. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included reduced mobility, depression, and anxiety. Review of the Activity of Daily Living (ADL) administration history record dated 12/11/2024 identified that Resident #1 is non-ambulatory and requires the assistance of 2 staff members for all ADLs. Review of the care plan dated 12/11/2024 identified Resident #1 requires a Hoyer lift (a device that lifts patients mechanically) for transfers related to reduced mobility as evidenced by impaired physical mobility with interventions that directed to provide the assistance of two (2) staff for transfers. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for resident rights, the facility failed to honor the resident's right for self-determination and honor the resident's right to make choices about his/her lift to interact and participate in community activities outside the facility, and failed to honor the resident's right for leave of absence (LOA) privileges upon readmission. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of opioid dependence. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognition, no behaviors, and was independent with transfers and wheelchair use. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/17/26 identified Resident #1 may go on leave of absence with wheelchair. Interventions directed if warranted staff may perform room search with Resident #1's consent. Record review failed to identify a physician's order regarding Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) and a Discharge MDS assessment were completed and transmitted timely. The findings include:Resident #1 had a diagnosis of opioid dependence. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognition, no behaviors, and was independent with transfers and wheelchair use. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/17/26 identified Resident #1 may go on leave of absence with wheelchair. Interventions directed if warranted staff may perform room search with Resident #1's consent. Record review identified the clinical record identified Resident #1 was discharged from the facility with return anticipated on 3/29/2026. Review of the discharge MDS dated [DATE] identified Section Z was signed and dated 5/15/2026 to indicate the MDS was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for professional standards of care, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse remained with Resident #1 when staff identified a change in condition that included the resident was unresponsive with agonal respirations at a rate of three (3) per minute, until Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of opioid dependence and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition and was independent with transfers and wheelchair mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/17/26 identified Resident #1 may go on Leave of Absence (LOA) with a wheelchair. Interventions directed independent LOA, and perform room search with consent. Nursing note dated 5/7/26 at 5:50 AM identified Resident #1 was observed at approximately 5:40 AM lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 residents (Resident #34) who expressed the desire to self-administer medications, the facility failed to complete a self-administration assessment and obtain a physician's order, according to facility policy, to ensure the resident was safe to self-administer medications. The findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses that included hyperkalemia, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #34 had intact cognition. Resident #34 required maximum assistance with toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. The nurses note dated 2/20/25 at 3:44 PM identified Resident #34 was changing rooms and wanted to be present during moving of personal belongings. The care plan dated 2/25/25 identified Resident #34 has end stage renal disease. Interventions included communication to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #34 and 59) reviewed for code status (code status refers to the level of medical interventions a person wishes to have started if their heart or breathing stops), the facility failed to ensure the resident's wishes for code status were honored. The findings include: 1. Resident #34 was readmitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, abnormal weight loss, protein-calorie malnutrition, opioid dependance, bipolar, major depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperkalemia. The admission physician's order dated [DATE] directed full code status (full code directs the medical team to take all possible measures to save the residents' life in the event of a medical emergency). The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #34 had intact cognition, and required maximum assistance with toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. The care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that the physician and resident representative were notified following a newly identified skin issue. The findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia of the left side, insulin dependent diabetes, and dementia. A physician's order dated 4/5/23 directed to complete weekly skin checks on Wednesdays on the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift and to complete a weekly skin observation if any new areas were identified. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 had moderately impaired cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and required staff to provide moderate assistance with toileting, dressing, and bathing. The care plan dated 11/5/24 identified that Resident #37 had a potential for alteration in skin integrity. Interventions included complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #79 and 87) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from verbal and physical abuse by another resident. The findings include: 1a. Resident #79 had diagnoses that included dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #79 had severely impaired cognition and was independent with ambulation. The care plan dated 3/4/25 identified Resident #79 had behavioral symptoms related to dementia, inappropriate behaviors towards staff and other residents, agitation, and verbal behaviors. Interventions included psychiatry for increased aggression and approach resident in a calm manner. b. Resident #91 had diagnoses that included dementia and history of traumatic brain injury. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #91 had memory problems with continuous inattentiveness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), the facility failed to incorporate the PASARR recommendations from the Level 2 determination into the resident's assessment and plan of care. Notice of PASARR dated 7/16/24 identified Resident #34 had a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, and Bipolar. Resident #34 was not on any antidepressants, mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, or other health medications prescribed currently, or other mental health medications prescribed currently or within the last 6 months. Resident #34 received a Level 2 approval with no specialized services needed. The PASARR did not reflect Resident #34 had opioid dependance. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety, opioid dependance, bipolar, depression, and psychotic disorder. A physician's order dated 9/20/24 directed to give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for PASARR, the facility failed to notify the state designated authority when Resident #13 received a new mental health and intellectual disability diagnosis. The findings include: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke and age-related cognitive decline. Review of the PASARR dated [DATE] identified the reason for screening as Resident #13's approval had expired and the resident needs additional time in the nursing facility. Resident #13 is expected to stay for long term care with a start date of [DATE]. Resident #13 had an admitting diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Resident #13 requires medication management and assistance with ADLs. Determination date [DATE] Resident #13 received long term care approval based on submitted information but if medical condition improves resident may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #91) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure interventions, including enhanced monitoring, were in place for a resident with a documented history of combative behavior towards staff, who later acted as the aggressor in a resident-to-resident physical altercation. The findings include: Resident #91 had diagnoses that included dementia and history of traumatic brain injury. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #91 had memory problems with continuous inattentiveness and disorganized thinking and was independent with ambulation and toileting. The care plan dated 12/26/24 identified Resident #91's behavioral symptoms included wandering and intrusiveness. Interventions included encouraging diversional activities and encouraging the resident to walk with staff when possible. a. Psychiatric consult dated 1/17/25 identified Resident #91 was combative at times, refused to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for lab monitoring following the start of a new medication, and for Resident #46 the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for the use of oxygen post hospitalization. The findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder with psychotic features, and dementia. Review of the clinical record identified that Resident #7 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 2/28/25 due to behavioral health issues including worsening agitation and aggression. Review of the W-10 dated 2/28/25 identified Resident #7 had new medications including Depakote 250mg twice daily (a seizure and mood stabilizing medication) to stabilize mood. A physician's order dated 2/28/25 directed to administer Depakote 250mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was transferred per the physician's orders resulting in a fall, for 1 resident (Resident #27) reviewed for smoking, the facility failed to ensure the resident was supervised and redirected when necessary to smoke in a safe manner, and the facility failed to ensure that smoking materials were accounted for, equipment in the smoking area was inspected at least monthly, and smoking materials were secured. The findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in November 2021 with diagnoses that included edema, diabetes, anxiety, diabetic neuropathy, urge incontinence, obesity. The care plan dated 9/19/24 identified Resident #13 was at risk for frequent falls. Interventions included a left leg brace and right sneaker while out of bed. A physician's order dated 12/13/24 directed to transfer with a standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for a specialized medical procedure, the facility failed to ensure consistent monitoring and documentation of intake and output for a resident on fluid restriction. The findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, and fluid overload. The care plan dated 2/28/25 identified Resident #39 had a diagnoses of end stage renal disease and received dialysis. Interventions included dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Review of the intake and output record for March 2025 identified staff failed to document the resident's intake and the resident failed to meet the 1,000 ml/day fluid restriction 26 of 93 occasions. The initial nutrition assessment dated [DATE] at 12:36 PM identified Resident #39 was on a renal diet with 1,000 ml/day fluid restrictions. Intake by mouth has been good since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a discrepancy for a controlled medication was investigated and resolved in a timely manner, failed to ensure that an individual use medication was labeled and dated, and failed to ensure that the controlled drug change of shift audits were completed. The findings include: 1. Observation of the electronic medication cabinet on 5/6/25 at 10:40 AM with RN #8 (agency nursing supervisor), located in the 2nd floor nursing supervisor's office, identified an alert on the sign on screen which identified You have one unresolved discrepancy on this cabinet. Interview with RN #8 at that time identified she was unable to resolve the discrepancy alert displayed on the medication cabinet as the facility did not allow any agency staff the ability to access the medication cabinet. RN #8 identified she worked at the facility sporadically but had noted that the discrepancy alert had been in place since her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to document weekly assessments and/or healing of a newly identified non-blanchable area of redness on the sacrum. The findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia of the left side, insulin dependent diabetes, and dementia. A physician's order dated 4/5/23 directed to complete weekly skin checks on Wednesdays on the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift and to complete a weekly skin observation if any new areas were identified. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 had moderately impaired cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and required staff to provide moderate assistance with toileting, dressing, and bathing. The care plan dated 11/5/24 identified that Resident #37 had a potential for alteration in skin integrity. Interventions included complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #163) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling medical device was placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). The findings include: Resident #163 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. A physician's order dated 4/15/25 directed to observe permcath (an indwelling medical device used as a vascular access for dialysis) site every shift. Monitor for signs and symptoms of infection. The physician's orders failed to identify a directive for the use of EBP. The nurse's note dated 5/2/25 at 8:03 PM identified Resident #163 was readmitted to the facility, was alert and oriented, had a permcath to the right chest, dressing was intact, dry and no signs of infection noted. This writer was able to verify the medications with the APRN. The skin was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #1, 7, 13 and 82) reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations, the facility failed to ensure that pneumococcal vaccines were offered timely. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses that included dementia, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition. Additionally, pneumococcal vaccine was not up to date and was not offered. The Preventative Health Record for Resident #1 did not reflect a pneumococcal vaccine status. Interview with LPN #1 (Infection Preventionist Nurse) on 5/6/25 at 10:20 AM indicated that Resident #1 has a conservator, and she had offered all the vaccines except the pneumococcal. LPN #1 indicated that she must have missed it because it was not on the same form as the other 3 vaccines. 2. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure when the resident had a fall with injury failed to ensure an RN assessment was conducted prior to transferring the resident. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included reduced mobility, depression, and anxiety. The care plan dated 12/11/24 identified Resident #1 requires a mechanical lift transfer related to reduced mobility as evidenced by impaired physical mobility with interventions that directed to provide the assistance of two (2) staff for transfers. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten (10) indicative of moderately impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, required maximal assistance with ADLs, bed mobility, and toileting, and transfers were not attempted due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #5) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #4 had diagnoses that included psychosis, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, anxiety, and mild neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbances. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as eleven (11) indicative of moderately impaired cognition, independent with transfers and ambulation, and required supervision with personal hygiene and dressing. The care plan dated 11/4/24 identified Resident #4 has verbal behaviors and disruptive symptoms directed toward residents and nurses with interventions that directed to administer medication to resident in a timely fashion to avoid disruptive behaviors, nurse aides to redirect resident when intrusive and seeks out nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #3) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure the residents medical record was complete and accurate to include documentation of foley output. The findings include: Resident #3 had a diagnosis of paraplegia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (alert and oriented) and had an indwelling catheter. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/6/2024 identified (foley) catheter use. Interventions directed to monitor intake and output. Nursing note dated 10/2/2024 at 4:30 PM identified the residents foley was patent but no output has been noted thus far and will continue to monitor. Nursing note dated 10/2/2024 at 7:30 PM identified the provider was updated regarding an abdominal mass on Resident #3's right upper quadrant and no urine output. An order was obtained to send the resident out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 20 of 28 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, and #21) who were reviewed for the accuracy of their clinical records, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff documented at the time when the medications were administered in accordance with professional standards. The findings include: Review of the census for 10/28/23 identified a census of twenty-eight (28) residents on the 2 [NAME] Unit. Review of the facility Administration Compliance Report for the 2 [NAME] Unit dated 10/27/23 to 10/28/23 identified Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, and #21 had multiple instances of missed signatures to denote that medications had been administered on the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift at 7:30 AM, 8:00 AM, 9:00 AM and 10:00 AM scheduled dose times. Interview with the Corporate Nurse Consultant on 11/22/23 at 12:40 PM identified the facility policy directs to sign off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on tour of the Dietary Department and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner. The findings include: Tour of the Dietary Department on 6/1/23 at 10:12 AM with Dietary [NAME] identified the following: a. The large stationary wall fan was observed blowing on the clean side of the dish room, and was noted to have a heavy accumulation of black dust, grime, and dirt like material. b. The 2 by 2 inch tile light fixture covering above the soiled dish side of the dishwashing room was noted with a heavy accumulation of dirt and a cracked corner piece. Subsequent to surveyors tour, the light fixture covering was replaced. c. The kitchen floor in the area that stored pans was covered with crumbs, grime and debris. d. The vent area between the pan storage area and the oven was observed to have dust, grime and dirt like material covering the vent grates. e. A large plastic garbage-like container on wheels was identified by the Dietary [NAME] to contain flour, was not dated or labeled as to when the flour was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #50, 56, and 80) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), the facility failed to ensure that PASARR screenings and re-screenings were completed timely. The findings include: 1. The Maximus Notice of Action dated 12/29/22 approved Resident #50 for a short term (skilled) nursing stay of 7 days and identified that the nursing facility in which Resident #50 resided was responsible for requesting further authorization if it believed the stay in the nursing facility for Resident #50 would be longer than the approved number of days. The notice further stated the nursing facility is responsible for submitting the updated level 1 and level of care screenings on admission so that a level 2 referral may be initiated. The notice identified Resident #50 required labs to be drawn 2 times per week, daily care for rash, required nursing services for bipolar disorder and chronic renal failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on tour of the Dietary Department and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner. The findings include: Tour of the Dietary Department on 6/1/23 at 10:12 AM with Dietary [NAME] identified the following: a. The large stationary wall fan was observed blowing on the clean side of the dish room, and was noted to have a heavy accumulation of black dust, grime, and dirt like material. b. The 2 by 2 inch tile light fixture covering above the soiled dish side of the dishwashing room was noted with a heavy accumulation of dirt and a cracked corner piece. Subsequent to surveyors tour, the light fixture covering was replaced. c. The kitchen floor in the area that stored pans was covered with crumbs, grime and debris. d. The vent area between the pan storage area and the oven was observed to have dust, grime and dirt like material covering the vent grates. e. A large plastic garbage-like container on wheels was identified by the Dietary [NAME] to contain flour, was not dated or labeled as to when the flour was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #41) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed obtain a physician's order for DNR to ensure the residents wishes were honored. The findings include: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility [DATE] with diagnosis which included acute respiratory disease, diabetes, and dementia. The clinical record identified a Do Not Resuscitate Consent Form (DNR) signed on [DATE] by the resident, a witness and the physician/APRN. (The DNR consent means that no cardiac pulmonary resuscitation (CPR/chest compressions) would be performed on Resident #41 in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest). The clinical record identified a physician's order in [DATE] that directed to provide CPR in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. The care plan dated [DATE] identified an advance directive of do not resuscitate (DNR). Interventions identified the decision for advance directives would be assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #53 and 67) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to an antibiotic therapy and failed to develop a care plan with interventions to address the resident's refusals to get out of bed. The findings include: 1. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility in December 2019 with diagnoses that included chronic viral hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, and metabolic encephalopathy. The nurse's note dated 1/9/20 at 2:00 PM identified Resident #53 was seen by the APRN and new orders after the completion of Cipro (1/11/20) start Bactrim DS 800/160 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every other day for prophylaxis (no stop date). A physician's order dated 7/17/21 directed to administer Bactrim DS (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) 800/160 mg tablet give 1 tablet by mouth every other day at 9:00 AM. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #53 had severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #33 and 73) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff followed the five rights of medication administration. The findings include: 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included schizoaffective disorder, cirrhosis of liver, and dysphagia. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #33 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with dressing and personal hygiene, supervision for all mobility with the use of a walker, had an anxiety disorder, depression, and schizophrenia. The care plan dated 4/26/23 identified Resident #33 had swallowing problems with interventions that included supervision for all meals, and aspiration precautions. The physician's order report dated 6/1/23 - 6/30/23 directed to crush all medications, assess resident to ensure he/she swallows all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse completed an assessment of the resident's condition when the resident verbalized he/she was not feeling well, felt weak and requested to go to the hospital and for 1 resident (Resident #21) reviewed for mood and behavior, the facility failed to ensure that staff administered a medication according to the physician's order. The findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included morbid obesity, chronic edema, and multiple myeloma. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had intact cognition. A nurse's note dated 5/15/23 at 9:28 AM identified that Resident #14 told the LPN he/she did not feel well and requested to go to the hospital because he/she felt weak. The nurse's note further identified that Resident #14 denied chest pain and had no signs or symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility documents, and facility policy for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #51) reviewed for smoking, the facility failed to complete smoking assessments and complete a Review of the Smoking Policy document when Resident #51 began smoking, per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included opiod abuse with induced mood disorder, depressive disorder and alcohol abuse. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #51 was cognitively intact and was independent with no set up help for bed mobility. The MDS further identified Resident #51 was independent with set up help for transfers, dressing, eating and toilet use, was independent for walking in room/corridor, and was not a current smoker. An Evaluation for Safe Smoking document dated 7/27/22 identified Resident #51 may smoke but must be supervised by staff. A Resident Care Plan dated 7/27/22 through 5/16/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #22) reviewed for pain management, the facility failed to provide the recommended intervention of a back brace in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #22 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region and chronic pain. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #22 had intact cognition and required supervision for transfers, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. Additionally, Resident #22 has moderate and frequent pain that requires opioids 7 days a week. The care plan dated 1/31/23 identified the risk for pain related to decreased mobility. Interventions included to evaluate effectiveness of pain management interventions and follow physical therapy recommendations. Occupational Therapy notes identified that on 4/13/23 and 4/18/23 they were still working on ordering brace with the insurance company. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #21) reviewed for mood and behavior, the facility failed to ensure the proper disposition of a controlled medication and for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #72) observed during medication administration, the facility failed to ensure an antidepressant was available for Resident #72 as per physician orders. The findings include: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm, anxiety, and opioid dependence. A physician's order dated 1/13/23 directed to administer Alprazolam (medication to manage anxiety) 2mg three times a day at 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM, and 5:00 PM. Review of the Controlled Substance Disposition Record for Resident #21 dated 4/8/23 at 1:00 PM identified an Alprazolam 2mg tablet fell and broke into pieces and a second dose of Alprazolam 2mg tablet was removed from the blister pack at that time. The record failed to identify if the medication that had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #38, 39 and 60) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to respond to pharmacy recommendations. The findings include: Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder and bipolar. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #38 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Additionally, the resident receives antipsychotic medication 7 days a week. The care plan dated 11/17/22 identified psychotropic medication use. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered. A physician's order dated 12/1/22 directed to administer Risperidone (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 mg 3 times a day. A physician's order dated 12/13/22 directed to increase Risperidone to 1 mg twice a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #38 and 39) reviewed for unnecessary medications and who were receiving antipsychotic medications, the facility failed to monitor for behaviors. The findings include: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder and bipolar. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #38 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Additionally, the resident receives antipsychotic medication 7 days a week. The care plan dated 11/17/22 identified psychotropic medication use. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered. A physician's order dated 12/1/22 directed to administer Risperidone (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 mg 3 times a day. A physician's order dated 12/13/22 directed to increase Risperidone to 1 mg twice a day scheduled, and twice a day as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms and staff interview, the facility failed to remove expired supplies from the medication room and failed to ensure the refrigerator was clean. The findings include: A tour of the Third Floor medication storage room on [DATE] at 11:20 AM with LPN #12 identified the following expired supplies and soiled refrigerator: 1a. Urinary catheter kits, 5 of 5, were located in a supply storage drawer and had expiration dates of 5/2017 (6 years past the expiration date), [DATE] (7 months past the expiration date, 2 kits had an expiration date of [DATE] (7 months past the expiration date), and [DATE] (3 months past the expiration date). b. Softsorb pads, 21 of 23, were observed in a storage drawer and had expiration dates of; 16 kits had an expiration date of [DATE] (4 months past the expiration date) and 5 kits had an expiration date of [DATE] (2 months past the expiration date). c. Honey infused dressings, 3 of 3, had an expiration date of 3/23 (3 months past the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #236) reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services, the facility failed to ensure the resident received rehabilitation services as ordered. The findings include: Resident #236 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included alcohol abuse, morbid (severe) obesity, and weakness. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #236 had intact cognition and required supervision for locomotion on and off the unit. A physician's order dated 5/19/23 directed skilled physical therapy to evaluate and treat as indicated. A physician's order dated 5/24/23 directed skilled occupational therapy to evaluate and treat as indicated. A physical therapy (PT) evaluation and plan of treatment identified that Resident #236's PT plan of treatment had a certification period of 5/19/23 through 7/17/23, with a frequency of 5 times per week for 8 weeks. An occupational therapy (OT) evaluation and plan of treatment had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the hallway tiled floor in the corridor where deliveries occur was in good repair and the housekeeping closet in that corridor was clean. The findings include: On 6/1/23 at 10:12 AM observation of the delivery corridor outside the Dietary Department with the Dietary [NAME] identified the following: a. 52 of 114 floor tiles to be chipped/cracked and in disrepair. b. 3 of the 4 walls of the Housekeeping closet (which was also located in the delivery corridor) were noted with a heavy accumulation of a black substance which was covered in dust. c. The tub basin of the Housekeeping closet was noted to contain a heavy accumulation of paper stickers, labels, trash and dust/debris. d. A yellow bucket paired with a corresponding mop was noted to be soiled with a heavy accumulation of black, dried debris. Interview with the Dietary [NAME] at that time identified the mop/bucket was stored in the Housekeeping closet by housekeeping and used in the Dietary Department by Dietary, but did not know who was responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 9 residents (Residents #9, #14, #15, #21, #35, #49, #65, #66, and #79) reviewed for Pneumococcal Vaccines, the facility failed to educate and offer the vaccines to the residents and/or resident representatives. The findings included: 1. Resident # 9 was admitted to the facility in December 2020 with diagnoses that included benign neoplasm of the brain and bipolar. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 was cognitively intact. The Pneumococcal Vaccine Form were not answered related to offered and declined, not eligible or not offered. The pneumococcal 23 and the Prevnar 13 forms and education were in the chart and blank. An interview on 3/31/21 at 9:30 A.M. with Resident #9 indicated he/she was not sure if he/she had the 2 vaccines and may have had one of the vaccines, but the facility would have to call the community doctor. Resident #9 indicated if she/he did not have the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #9 and # 12) reviewed for Advanced Directives, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's representative were able to make their own Advanced Directive known and followed by the facility. The findings included: 1.Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses that included benign brain tumor and bipolar. The care plan dated [DATE] identified a psychosocial wellbeing. Interventions directed Resident #9 had the following Advanced Directive on record which noted the resident was a full code. Resident #9 advanced directive are in effect and my wishes and directions will be carried out in accordance with my advance directives. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 had intact cognition and needed supervision for ADL. A physician's order dated [DATE] and [DATE] directed Resident #9 was a full code. The Physician note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #37) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to notify the responsible person of the development of a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI). The findings include: Resident # 37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included a left elbow contracture, muscle weakness and abnormalities of mobility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 had moderately impaired cognition, was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance of one person assist with personal hygiene and bed mobility. The MDS assessment further identified Resident #37 exhibited non-verbal indications of pain on a daily basis and the presence of a stage three pressure ulcer to the sacrum. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/8/2021 identified a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) noted to left lateral foot. An intervention include to apply skin prep every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #9 , #79) reviewed for Abuse and one resident (Resident # 60) reviewed for injury of unknown origin , the facility failed to ensure the allegation of verbal abuse was immediately reported to the State Agency in accordance with State Law and/ or that the results of the outcome of the investigation was reported to the state agency within 5 working days. The findings included: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included benign neoplasm tumor of the brain, bipolar, and antisocial personality disorder. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 had intact cognition. Additionally, indicted the resident exhibited no behaviors such as physical or verbal towards staff or others and indicated the resident received antipsychotic medications 7 days a week. The care plan dated 1/12/21 identified psychotropic medication use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #9 #79 and # 60) reviewed for Abuse, the facility failed to ensure the allegation of verbal abuse and injuries of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated. The findings included: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included benign neoplasm tumor of the brain, bipolar, and antisocial personality disorder. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 had intact cognition. Additionally, indicted the resident exhibited no behaviors such as physical or verbal towards staff or others and indicated the resident received antipsychotic medications 7 days a week. The care plan dated 1/12/21 identified psychotropic medication use. Interventions directed to assess if behavioral symptoms present a danger to myself or others and intervene as needed. A physician's order dated 3/3/21 directed to give Risperdal ( Anti-psychotic)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one resident (Resident #18) reviewed for oxygen, the facility failed obtain a physician's order for oxygen. The findings include: Resident #18's diagnoses included respiratory failure, sarcoidosis of the lung, congestive heart failure and sleep apnea. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #18 was cognitively intact and required supervision assistance with ADL. Resident #18's care plan dated 3/30/21 identified ineffective breathing patterns related to impaired regulation as evidenced by apnea during sleep. Resident will maintain respiratory status to baseline parameters for pattern rate, depth and ease. Interventions include: to apply Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) as ordered. The care plan directed to see the residents Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the need to assess frequency and pattern of breathing; observe presence of apnea, maintain CPAP machine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store emergency medications and solutions in the emergency medication box to ensure that the medications were stored with appropriate expiration dates to meet professional standards. The findings include: Observation with RN #2 ( Infection Control Nurse) on 3/30/21 at 11:00 A.M. of the facility emergency medication box identified that there were two (2) Propranolol 10 Milligrams ( MG) tablets with an expiration date of 1/14/21, two (2) Penicillin 250 MG tablets with an expiration date of 2/28/21, four (4) Nitrofurantoin 50 MG tablets with an expiration date of 1/5/21 and ten (10) Oseltamivir 30 MG tablets with an expiration date of 9//20/20. An expiration dated 1/21 label was observed on each drawer of the medication e-box. Interview with RN #1 on 3/31/21 at 11:30 A.M. identified that she or the supervisors are responsible for checking the e-box and indicated staff would check expiration prior to obtaining the medication for administration .She further stated that the facility had not used the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-07 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #46 and Resident 50) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy to the resident representative when the resident was transferred to the hospital. The findings include: 1. Resident #46 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and dementia. The resident census identified the following hospital transfers for Resident #46: Resident #46 was transferred to the hospital on 3/10/25 and returned to the facility on 3/15/25. Resident #46 was transferred to the hospital on 3/19/25 and returned to the facility on 3/22/25. Review of the clinical record failed to identify that written notice of the bed hold policy had been provided to the resident/representative at or following the time of the transfers on 3/10/25 and 3/19/25. An interview with the Administrator on 5/5/25 at 10:54 AM identified it was the nursing staff responsibility to ensure the bed hold policy was provided to the resident/resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-07 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 certified nurse aide personnel files reviewed, the facility failed to complete annual employee performance reviews at least every twelve months. The findings include: Review of NA #10's personnel file identified her date of hire as 2/10/15. The last performance review was on 8/3/20, 5 years ago. An interview with the Administrator on 5/6/25 at 9:13 AM identified it was the responsibility of the DNS and ADNS to ensure the completion of annual evaluations. Frequent turnover in staffing likely contributed to the evaluation not being completed annually. The Annual Employee Evaluation policy directs all employees' job performance be evaluated annually based on their hire date or facility - defined cycle and applies to all full time, part time and per diem employees across all departments.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2021-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and facility policy, interview and reviewed of the facility Infection Control Program, the facility failed to at least annually review and approve the Infection Control Policy and Procedure Manual, Intravenous Therapy Policy and Procedure Manual, and the Nursing Policy and Procedure Manual by the Medical Director, Director of Nursing and Administrator. The finding include: An interview and review of the Infection Control Program, Intravenous Therapy (IV) Policy, and Nursing Policy and Procedure Manuals with DNS on 3/30/21 at 11:30 A, M. noted the Annual Policy and Procedure Manual Review and Approval for the facility Infection Control Policies were last signed on 1/13/20 a year and 3 months ago by the Medical Director, DNS and Administrator. The DNS indicated she forgot to have the Medical Director review the policy and procedure manuals in January 2021. The DNS indicated it was her responsibility to make sure the Medical Director review the policies. An interview with the Administrator on 3/30/21 at 12:25 P.M. noted the Administrator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-03-31 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the facility Personal Funds Accounts for petty cash and review of policy for 6 days out of 20 weeks, the facility failed to ensure that residents could readily access petty cash when needed. The findings include: Resident # 28's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease and mild intellectual disability. The current face sheet identified the resident was self-responsible. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident had no cognitive deficits and no behavioral or mood problems. Interview with Resident #28 on 3/24/21 at 11:04 A.M. identified the resident had been told at times she/he can't get as much of his/her money from the facility personal fund account for residents as was wanted secondary to the facility not having enough money, they should have more on hand. Review of petty cash logs from 11/25/20 through 3/24/21 identified: 1/20/21- 5.00 dollars balance, not replenished until 1/21/21. 1/26/21 5.00 dollars balance. 1/27/21 at 3:49 P.M. 5.00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-03-31 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, interviews and review of the RAI manual, for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for PASARR, (Residents #22, Resident #28 and Resident #39), the facility failed to ensure the resident's MDS accurately reflected the resident's current status .The findings include: Resident #22's diagnoses included Bipolar disorder. A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) identified positive Level II condition with 120 day long term care approval, dated 7/11/19. A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) identified positive Level II condition with long term care approval, dated 11/5/19. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 22 was not currently considered by the state level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. The MDS assessment further identified the resident had no cognitive impairment and had Bipolar disorder. Interview and record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,110 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-02-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIVITA CARE CENTERS — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CT6 OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2024
ESNH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2024
JPNH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2024
PEPPER, YEHUDAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2024
SCHWARCZ, ELLIOTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2024
107 OSBORNE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 10/01/2024
RAAD, MARCIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
THOMAS, CHIOMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
EVERFLOW HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
SFNH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$531K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 5%Other / private 14%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $531K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,468per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$351per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075274. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next