Civita Care Center At Long Ridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 199 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure an accident was reported timely when Resident #1 hit his/her hip during a transfer. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of chronic atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), vascular dementia, and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition and required partial assistance with transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/10/26 identified a fall risk, agitation, restlessness, and needed assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions directed to provide one (1) staff assistance for transfers. The nursing note dated 3/11/26 at 8:10 AM identified Resident #1 was observed with discoloration and pain to the left hip. The APRN was notified and Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on tour of the kitchen, observations, review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that expired food items were discarded in a timely manner, dishwasher temperatures and sanitizing sink sanitizer concentrations were consistently recorded. The facility also failed to ensure the 3-bay sink was used appropriately, and clean dishes were stored in a sanitary manner. The findings included: a An observation of the walk-in refrigerator with [NAME] #1 at 11:20 AM identified an open can of whipped cream with dry white substance on the tip of the can. There were also some brown stains on the metal-colored area of the can. The expiration date on the whipped cream can indicated Best by 5/14/2024. [NAME] #1 identified a dietary aide who arrives at 11:30 AM is responsible for deep cleaning the walk-in refrigerator. [NAME] #1 further indicated the facility had no longer need for whipped cream from the cans and is now using non-dairy whipped cream. [NAME] #1 was unable to identify why the can had not been discarded. b. A review of the dish machine temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #5), the facility failed to consistently provide a shower twice a week per the resident's preference. The findings include: Resident #5's diagnoses included quadriplegia and chronic pain. A care plan revised dated 5/16/2025 indicated Resident #5 had mobility impairment related to quadriplegia. Interventions included: transferring the resident to an adaptive wheelchair using a mechanical lift with the assistance of two staff members. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 was cognitively intact and did not exhibit behaviors of rejection of care. The MDS assessment further indicated Resident #5 was dependent for bathing and transferring. A physician's order reviewed on 7/8/2025 directed to shower/bath Resident #5 on Wednesday and Saturday. A Nurse Aide Care card directed that Resident # 5 receive a shower/bath on Wednesday and Saturday. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #73), the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse. The findings include: 1.Resident #73's diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and alcohol-induced psychotic disorder with hallucinations. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #73 had moderate cognitive impairment and had exhibited potential indicators of psychosis such as hallucinations and delusions. The MDS assessment further indicated Resident #73 had not exhibited behaviors directed towards others. A nursing note by Registered Nurse (RN #1) dated 4/1/2025 identified the charge nurse (LPN#2) reported Resident #73 had informed LPN#2 that she/he had been hit by his/her roommate (Resident #38). The nursing note further indicated the resident was assessed by RN#1, no injuries noted, and the appropriate staff were notified, including the police department. A social work note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy review and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #131) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of the cause of an unwitnessed fall with bruising per facility policy. The findings include:Resident #131's diagnoses included coronary artery disease, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and essential tremors.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #131 was cognitively intact and required a wheelchair for mobility. The resident also required 2 or more helpers with toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and shower transfer. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) updated on 1/22/25 identified Resident #131 was on hospice and goals of care directed supportive and palliative in nature.A nurse's note dated 2/19/25 at 2:30 PM identified Resident #131 stated she/he had a fall when she/he lost his/her balance when Resident #131 attempted to get up from her/his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation facility policy and interview for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #128) reviewed for Hospitalization, the facility failed to provide a bed hold form to the resident/resident representative when resident was sent to the hospital and follow policy and procedures. The findings include:Resident #128's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the right dominant side, aphasia (trouble with speaking, understanding, reading, writing), and atrial fibrillation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #128 was intact cognitively and required the assistance of 2 or more helpers with toileting hygiene, showering, and transfers. The nurse's note dated 7/7/25 at 2:00 PM identified Resident #128 was transferred to the hospital via ambulance and Resident #128's responsible party was notified.The nurse's note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical review, review of policy and interview for the only resident reviewed for dementia (Resident #4), the facility failed to ensure staff initiated a care plan for a resident with dementia. The findings include: Resident #4's diagnosis includes dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated dementia would be addressed in the care plan. On 7/18/2025 at 1:14 PM an interview and record review with the Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS) indicated Resident #4 had a diagnosis of dementia, the admission MDS assessment indicated the facility would proceed with care planning for dementia. However, she/he did not know why nursing had not initiated a dementia care plan and would add a dementia care plan at this time (177 days or 5 months, 26 days later). The facility Policy labeled Comprehensive Care Planning indicated in part, each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed within 7 days of the completion of the required MDS assessment and no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #61), the facility failed to ensure staff reported weight discrepancies. The findings include: Resident # 61's diagnosis includes end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. The hospital Inter-Agency Referral Report dated 7/4/2025 at 11:08 AM indicated a weight of 98.3kg (converted to pounds 98.3 x 2.2 = 216.26 lbs.). A physician's order dated 7/4/2025 directed to obtain a weight monthly on the first day of the month on the 7:30AM to 3:30 PM shift. A physician's order dated 7/4/2025 directed to obtain a weekly weight times 4 weeks on Fridays on the 7:30 AM to 3:30 PM shift. The Vitals Report for weights entry dated 7/4/2025 at 11:24 PM indicated Resident #61's weight was 200.2 pounds and on 7/5/2025 at 9:44 PM weight was 200.2 pounds. On 7/6/2025 at 9:23 PM Resident #61's was entered at 200.3 pounds. The Vitals Report for weights dated 7/7/ 2025 at 2:34 PM indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to implement professional standards of care when Resident #1 was found unresponsive to determine if the episode was cardiac versus choking. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnosis included dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing). A physician's order dated 10/7/23 Resident #1's an advanced directive was Full Code (to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). A physician's order dated 10/31/23 directed a soft, chopped renal diet with thin liquids. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had some memory recall deficits, difficulty focusing attention, and disorganized thinking and was independent of eating after set-up. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/9/24 identified potential for impaired dentition related to multiple missing or broken teeth and high nutritional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, job descriptions, and interviews for 7 of 8 units, the facility failed to ensure the environment was clean, maintained in good repair, and a in a homelike manner. The findings include: Observation during the initial tour on 9/24/23 at 10:08 AM through 11:30 AM, and on 9/25/23 at 12:15 PM with the Environmental Services Director, and the ADNS identified the following: a. Damaged, bent, and/or broken bed footboard in bedroom on First floor South wing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. b. Damaged, torn, stains, and/or peeling wallpaper in bedroom on Second floor South wing in rooms 201, 202, 203, 205, 206, 207, 208, and 209. Second floor [NAME] wing in rooms 210, 212, 213, 214, 216, and 219. Second floor North wing in rooms 220, 221, 222, 223, and 227. Third floor South wing in rooms 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, and 309. Third floor [NAME] wing in rooms 310, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 318, and 319. Third floor North wing in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. c. Damaged, torn,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIVITA CARE CENTERS — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $770K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT