Mystic Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center, LLC
475 High St, Mystic, CT 06355 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (860) 536-6070 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $38,860 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-19)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 39.5% | 18.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 6.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 22.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 40.5% | 16.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.5% | 17.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.8% | 24.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.6% | 17.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.2% | 69.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.6% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.4% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.50 | 2.06 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.28 | 1.46 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.7%CMS range 49.9–70.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.0–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.7–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.72 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 90.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for four (4) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4), reviewed for a safe environment, the facility failed to ensure the environment was safe from accidents or hazards, when a food cart containing meal trays was stored outside of the locked kitchen door overnight and was accessible to cognitively impaired residents, who were prescribed modified diets and had wandering behaviors, which created a choking hazard. Additionally, one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1) experienced a choking episode requiring the Heimlich maneuver after accessing food from the unattended tray chart. This failure resulted in the finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: 1.Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dysphagia.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe short and long-term memory recall deficits (Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the assistance of two staff for transfers, the facility failed to transfer the resident according to the plan of care resulting in a fall with major injury (left hip fracture) requiring surgical intervention. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarct affecting left side, abnormality of gait, muscle weakness, and bradycardia.The physician's order dated 2/9/26 directed an assist of two (2) using the ETAC [NAME] (turn aid with a functional design that offers safe patient turning with standing support during transfers).The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14) and was dependent on staff for transfers in and out of bed and chair and required maximum assistance with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from accidents resulting in sustaining several burn wounds from a hot beverage spill and the failure to implement an ordered intervention to prevent further injury. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, generalized muscle weakness and polyneuropathy (peripheral nerve disorder that causes multiple nerves throughout the body to malfunction at the same time which can cause numbness, pain, tingling or a burning sensation). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10) and was independent with eating, bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. A nurse's note dated 3/10/25 at 3:03 AM identified Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident #2) who were admitted to the facility over the prior ninety (90) days, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an elopement incident involving a resident with known wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, when the facility did not interview all potential staff witnesses to determine how Resident #2 exited the building unattended through the rear exit door. Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident #2) who were admitted to the facility over the prior ninety (90) days, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an elopement incident involving a resident with known wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, when the facility did not interview all potential staff witnesses to determine how Resident #2 exited the building unattended through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for three (3) of nine (9) sampled residents (Residents #2, #5, and #6) reviewed for elopement, he facility failed to conduct required wandering/elopement risk assessments upon admission and re-admission in accordance with facility policy and the admission process, resulting in delayed identification and implementation of elopement interventions, including Resident #2 who subsequently exited the facility unattended The findings include:1. Resident #2's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1), required maximum assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, showers, and bathing and self-propelled in a wheelchair.The Resident Care Plan dated 3/6/26 identified Resident #2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for elopement, the facility failed to implement existing elopement interventions for a severely cognitively impaired resident with known wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, resulting in Resident #2 exiting the facility unattended through a secured rear exit door without staff knowledge. The findings included:Resident #2's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1), required maximum assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, showers, and bathing and self-propelled in a wheelchair.The Resident Care Plan dated 3/6/26 identified Resident #2 was at risk of wandering and elopement. Interventions directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policies, and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plan implementation, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the resident's person-centered care plan and Resident Care Card, which directed a pureed diet and monitoring during meals for aspiration, as evidenced by staff providing snacks without knowledge of a resident's prescribed diet and the failure to prevent access to food inconsistent with the prescribed diet. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dysphagia.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe short and long-term memory recall deficits (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2), was dependent on staff for eating and was independent with transfers in and out of bed and ambulation.The Resident Care Plan dated 1/30/26 identified Resident #1 was at risk of weight loss, exhibited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policies, and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a safe environment, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were aware of a resident's prescribed diet and failed to ensure staff reported observed unsafe eating behaviors, resulting in a cognitively impaired resident accessing food inconsistent with the prescribed diet and experiencing a choking episode. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dysphagia.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe short and long-term memory recall deficits (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2), was dependent on staff for eating and was independent with transfers in and out of bed and ambulation.The Resident Care Plan dated 1/30/26 identified Resident #1 was at risk of weight loss, exhibited wandering behaviors and was at risk of elopement. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #3, Resident #11, and Resident #78) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to obtain admission weights, monthly weights and re-weights per the facility policy. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, malignant neoplasm of the lower stomach, and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). The Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The Resident Care Plan in effect from 7/13/25 through 1/14/26 identified dysphagia. Interventions included to maintain diet consistency per speech recommendation and/or physician order for LCS (low concentrated sweets) NAS (no added salt) regular texture and thin liquids and to check lung sounds every shift if indicated. The Resident Care Plan also indicated the resident had a cardiac…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy for 2 of 2 medication storage carts and 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage, the facility failed to label open medications appropriately. The findings include:Interview and observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 on 1/13/26 at 9:35 AM of unit D-wing's medication cart identified the following:CoQ10 100 milligram (mg), 1 open bottle with no open dateDocusate Sodium 100 mg, 2 open bottles with no open dateBiotin 1000 micrograms (mcg), 1 open bottle with no open dateAcidophilus Probiotic, 1 open bottle with no open dateMelatonin 5 mg, 1 open bottle with no open dateMelatonin 3 mg, 1 open bottle with no open dateMelatonin 1 mg, 1 open bottle with no open dateGeri-Knot, 1 open bottle with no open dateBisacodyl 5 mg, 1 open bottle with no open dateProbiotic, 1 open bottle with no open dateNaproxen Sodium, 1 open bottle with no open date Fish Oil 1000 mg, 1 open bottle with no open date Calcium 600 mg,1 open bottle with no open date Eye Relief Ophthalmic Solution, 1 open bottle with no open date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of the clinical records and policy, for the only sampled resident (Resident #2) reviewed for urinary catheters, the facility failed to provide a privacy covering for a urinary collection bag, and for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #9 and Resident #73) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure dignified treatment was maintained. The findings include:1. Resident #2's diagnoses included flaccid neuropathic bladder, retention of urine, and hematuria (blood in urine).The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, required set up for eating and was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/21/25 identified Resident #2 had alteration in urinary elimination related to a urinary catheter (urine drainage tube). Interventions included assessing urine output, change the urinary catheter and bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and facility policy for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #56) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to notify a representative/emergency contact following a fall. The findings include:Resident #56's diagnoses included fracture of sacrum, difficulty in walking, and diastolic (congestive) heart failure. The Resident Care Plan dated in effect on 12/ 26/25 identified Resident #56 was a fall risk related to left hip pain. Interventions included ensuring appropriate footwear was worn, keeping the bed in the lowest position, and frequent rounding for safety and redirection.A Reportable Event form dated 12/26/25 identified Resident #56 had an unwitnessed fall at 6:45 PM but failed to indicate the resident's family was notified.A post fall evaluation dated 12/26/25 at 8:56 PM identified Resident #56 had an unwitnessed fall, but the responsible party had not been notified as no next of kin was listed due to Resident #56 being newly admitted .The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to revise the Resident Care Plan (RCP) to include interventions for triggers related to a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The findings include:Resident #3's diagnosis included diabetes, anxiety, and PTSD.The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with bathing and transfers.Review of Resident #3's Resident Care Plan dated 7/3/25 through 1/14/26 failed to identify a diagnosis of PTSD with interventions that included the triggers related to PTSD or how to assist the resident when expressions or indications of distress that the resident has experienced due to PTSD trauma.Review of psychiatric provider notes from 7/8/25 through 1/7/26 identified a diagnosis of PTSD.Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #3 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #41) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for a subcutaneous injection was administered properly. The findings include: Resident #41's diagnoses included gastroenteritis (stomach/intestinal inflammation) and colitis (inflammation of the colon). The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating Resident #41 was cognitively intact and required maximal assistance with eating, bathing, and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/17/25 identified that due to the gastrointestinal inflammation Resident #41 was on a tube feed 14 hours per day and received medication through a Gastrostomy Tube (tube that goes directly into the stomach). Physician orders in effect 12/17/25 to 1/13/26 directed to administer Octreotide Acetate Injection Solution 100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record, and policy for the only sampled resident (Resident #73) reviewed for activities, the facility failed to ensure activities were offered to a dependent resident. The findings include:Resident #73 diagnoses included suspected adult neglect (from the hospital), anxiety, and neuropathy (nerve pain).The Resident Preferences Evaluation (completed upon admission) dated 1/29/25 identified Resident #73 found it very important to have books, newspapers and magazines to read, keep up with the news, and do his/her favorite activities (favorite activities were not specified).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #73 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment, required set-up assistance for eating and partial/moderate assistance for dressing and transfers. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #73 found it important to have books, newspapers and magazines to read,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, observation and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #98) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to follow physician orders to offload the resident's heels and failed to follow physician orders for the appropriate treatment of a wound. The findings include: Resident #98's diagnoses included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia and pressure ulcer to their left ischium. The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #98 was alert and oriented to person and presented as chronically disoriented and confused. The Resident Care Plan identified Resident #98 was at risk for alteration in skin integrity. Interventions included using pressure redistribution devices as ordered, and perform treatments as ordered.A. A physician's order dated 1/5/26 directed to elevate bilateral heels off the bed with pillows or use foam boots to prevent heel ulcers. Observation on 1/7/26 at 1:45 PM, and on 1/8/26 at 11:31 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and review of facility policy, for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #74) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that behavior monitoring was being performed with antipsychotic medication administration. The findings includeResident #74's diagnosis included dementia with behavioral disturbance, substance abuse, and diabetes.The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the MDS failed to identify a psychiatric diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication.Review of the Resident Care Plan in effect from January 2025, through January 14, 2026, identified a behavioral disturbance. Interventions directed to conduct behavioral monitoring.A physician order dated 1/18/25 directed to administer Seroquel (an antipsychotic) 50 milligrams at bedtime for schizophrenia. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observations, interviews and facility policy for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #11 and Resident #98) reviewed for Resident #11 reviewed for infection prevention practices, the facility failed to wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and for Resident #98 reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene practices. The findings include: 1.Resident #11 's diagnoses included Sepsis, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and Dementia. A physician's order dated 12/20/25 directed to administer Ertapenem sodium injection solution reconstituted 1 gram intravenously once a day for Sepsis until 1/16/26 at 100 milliliters/hour over 30 minutes via a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter. (PICC) The baseline Resident Care Plan dated 12/20/25 identified enhanced barrier precautions related to current antibiotic (intravenous) therapies. Interventions included handwashing between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from verbal mistreatment. The findings include:Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included stroke with resultant hemiplegia and hemiparesis (loss of movement on one side of the body), anxiety, and major depression. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (was alert and oriented), and was dependent for toileting, transfers and bed mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/18/2025 identified Resident #1 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder was long term placement. The RCP directed to provide incontinent care upon request, toilet upon request and staff to provide emotional support. A facility investigation (A &I) report dated 8/28/2025 at 9:00 AM identified an allegation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse timely. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included stroke with resultant hemiplegia and hemiparesis (loss of movement on one side of the body), anxiety, and major depression. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (was alert and oriented), and was dependent for toileting, transfers and bed mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/18/2025 identified Resident #1 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder was long term placement. The RCP directed to provide incontinent care upon request, toilet upon request and staff to provide emotional support. A facility investigation (A &I) report dated 8/28/2025 at 9:00 AM identified an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin, the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care timely following a newly discovered wound and failed to ensure the residents plan of care addressed frequent refusals of care. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, generalized muscle weakness and polyneuropathy (peripheral nerve disorder that causes multiple nerves throughout the body to malfunction at the same time which can cause numbness, pain, tingling or a burning sensation). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10) and was independent with eating, bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. A. A nurse's note dated 3/17/25 at 12:51 PM identified Occupational Therapist (OT) #1 reported a 16 cm by 7 cm skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin, the facility failed to ensure a full body skin assessment was performed after the discovery of an injury of unknown origin and failed to document every shift on an injury of unknown origin per physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, generalized muscle weakness and polyneuropathy (peripheral nerve disorder that causes multiple nerves throughout the body to malfunction at the same time which can cause numbness, pain, tingling or a burning sensation). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10) and was independent with eating, bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. A nurse's note dated 3/17/25 at 12:51 PM identified Occupational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for four (4) of six (6) residents (Residents #3, 4, 5 and 6) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that the grievance forms were filled out and responded to per policy and failed to ensure the residents were provided support timely after allegations of abuse/mistreatment were made within the facility. The findings include: 1. Resident #3's diagnoses included anxiety disorder and depression. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/28/24 identified Resident #3 has the potential for impaired psychosocial wellbeing related to the loss of independence and the need for assistance with interventions that included encouraging the resident to verbalize feelings and make routine daily decisions. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fifteen (15) indicative of intact cognition and was dependent on staff for personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for four (4) of six (6) residents (Residents #3, 4, 5 and 6) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified of allegations of abuse/mistreatment timely. The findings include: 1. Resident #3's diagnoses included anxiety disorder and depression. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/28/24 identified Resident #3 has the potential for impaired psychosocial wellbeing related to the loss of independence and the need for assistance. Interventions included encouraging the resident to verbalize feelings and make routine daily decisions. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fifteen (15) indicative of intact cognition and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, toileting, bed mobility and transfers. Interview with Resident #3 on 2/13/25 at 11:59 AM identified that on several occasions in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for five (5) of six (6) residents (Residents #2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse or neglect and failed to ensure a complete investigation was completed on Resident #1. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 's diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three (3) indicative of severely impaired cognition and required supervision assistance with personal hygiene, transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/20/25 identified that Resident #1 has impaired cognition related to a diagnosis of dementia with behaviors including aggression and striking out with interventions that included to provide two (2) staff for all care during the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift for sundowning behaviors, staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from abuse when a staff member was observed pushing the resident into the wheelchair. The findings include: Resident #1 's diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three (3) indicative of severely impaired cognition and required supervision assistance with personal hygiene, transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/20/25 identified that Resident #1 has impaired cognition related to a diagnosis of dementia with behaviors including aggression and striking out with interventions that included to provide two (2) staff for all care during the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift for sundowning behaviors, staff to identify themselves and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure there was two (2) staff present for care of the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift on 1/25/25 per the resident's plan of care. The findings include: Resident #1 's diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three (3) indicative of severely impaired cognition and required supervision assistance with personal hygiene, transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/20/25 identified that Resident #1 has impaired cognition related to a diagnosis of dementia with behaviors including aggression and striking out with interventions included to provide two (2) staff for all care during the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift for sundowning behaviors, staff to identify themselves and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility policy review, and interviews for two of six sampled residents (Resident #11 and #35) who received oxygen therapy, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place for a resident who required the use of continuous oxygen and failed to change oxygen tubing according to physician's orders and to prevent nosocomial infections. findings include: 1. Resident #11's diagnoses included asthma, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF), morbid obesity, sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The clinical admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #11was re-admitted to the facility with continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The care plan dated 7/12/23 identified Resident #11 had the potential for alteration in respiratory status with the potential for poor airway clearance, dyspnea, fatigue, and respiratory distress related to COPD, CHF, morbid obesity, sleep apnea and oxygen dependence.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one off three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident from leaving the building unescorted. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, syncope, metabolic encephalopathy, and major depressive disorder. The significant change in condition Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision with an assistive device for locomotion. Review of the Elopement Evaluation performed on 8/14/2023 identified Resident #1's had a score of eight (8). Further review of the evaluation identified a score value of one (1) or higher indicates a resident is at risk for elopement. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/22/2023 identified Resident #1 was a wandering/elopement risk. Resident was exit seeking and stated he/she wanted to go home.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #65) who was reviewed for decline in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the facility failed to ensure the resident did not experience a decline in transfer status . The findings include: Resident #65's diagnosis included, morbid obesity due to excess calories, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), unspecified spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, epilepsy and anxiety disorder . A physician's order dated 1/11/2021 for the resident's activity level directed contact guard for mobility level. admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #65 with intact cognition, extensive assist with one person for bed mobility. Extensive assist, two-person physical assistance. Extensive assist with one person for locomotion on unit, toileting, and personal hygiene. Moving from seating to standing position the assessment identified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #19) reviewed for smoking, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during smoking and for one of four residents (Resident #4) reviewed for Accidents, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had supervision during meals per the hospitals recommendations and for one resident (Resident # 44) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner to prevent a fall. The findings included: 1. Resident #19 had diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, pulmonary embolism, bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #19 was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with one-person physical support for personal hygiene. The care plan identified the resident is risk for potential injury related to smoking. Interventions include to ascertain resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews for two of five residents (Resident #24 and Resident #70) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing per physician orders and for three out five residents who utilized respiratory equipment ( Residents # #4, 55 and 429), the facility failed to ensure the resident's oxygen tubing was dated and labeled . The findings include: 1 Resident #24 had diagnoses that included legal blindness, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and cerebral infarction. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #24 had severe cognitive impairment, required total assistance with two-person physical support for all ADL and identified the utilization of oxygen while being a resident. The physician's order dated 1/03/21 identified to change oxygen and nebulizer tubing as well as the humidifier bottle once a week. Physician's order dated 11/10/18 identified to apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #5 and Resident #57) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to provide care per resident's preferences. The findings included: 1. Resident #5 diagnoses included dementia, spinal stenosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set ( MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 was cognitively intact and required supervision with one-person physical support for personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP)7/23/21 identified the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit related to fatigue, impaired balance, limited mobility and pain. Interventions include: to provide the resident with showers twice weekly with assistance., to provide assistance with ADL. Resident #5 prefers to have a basin of hot water and personal care items at bedside at 6:30 A.M. The resident is able to perform waist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews for eight of ten residents (Resident #12, #16, #17, #29, #32, #61, #64, and #72) reviewed for Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were given timely and for one resident (Resident # 12) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to ensure anti-embolism compression stockings were applied per the physician order. The findings included: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in April 2017 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, diabetics mellitus, and dementia. Review of the Medication Administration Record on 7/28/21 directed the glipizide 2.5 Milligrams (MG) for diabetes scheduled at 7:30 A.M. in the morning before breakfast was given at 12:55 PM. The Humalog 5 units subcutaneous before meals for diabetes scheduled at 8:00 A.M. was given at 12:55 P.M. The Pradaxa 75 MG two times a day for atrial fibrillation scheduled at 9:00 A.M. was not given until 12:55 P.M. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for one resident (Resident #51) reviewed for Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. The findings include: Resident #51 's diagnoses included pulmonary embolism, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstruction pulmonary disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #51 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of fifteen, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/16/21 identified a potential for cardiac output secondary to chronic heart failure, dyslipidemia, hypertension, bilateral lower extremity edema, and history of Deep Vein Thrombus (DVT) / Pulmonary Embolism (PE). Interventions included to administer any medications and treatments as ordered. Observations and interview with RN #5 on 7/28/21 at 12:15 P.M. identified RN #5 in the process of starting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for one resident (Resident # 12) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record. The findings include: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in April 2017 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, left anterior fascicular block, chronic atrial fibrillation, and dementia. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 had severely impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. The care plan dated 5/11/21 identified an alteration in cardiac/circulatory status related to atrial fibrillation, hypertension, left anterior fascicular block, and hyperlipidemia. Interventions directed to monitor for pain, edema, cyanosis or dyspnea and report to physician. The physician's progress note dated 6/16/21 identified Resident #12 had Chronic heart failure and the plan was to apply [NAME] stockings in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility documentation facility, review of facility policy, the failed to appropriately sanitize a medical device and the facility failed to ensure that staff sign off on water management procedures per facility practice . The findings included: 1. During observation of medication administration on 7/26/2021 at 11:50 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN #7) was observed preparing materials to assess Resident # 35's blood sugar. RN# 7 was observed to have two (2) glucometers on her medication cart. She was observed to remove a germicidal disposable wipe identified as a bleach product from its container and briefly wipe one of the devices and place on a paper towel. RN# 7 then proceeded to gather materials including gloves, 2 x 2 gauze, alcohol wipes, lancet and test strip. RN# 7 proceeded into room and placed the materials directly onto Resident # 35's overbed table without the benefit of any field (barrier). She then proceeded to obtain blood sample from the resident's finger applied to the test strip in the glucometer. With gloved hands she was then noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-01-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, interviews and facility policy during a review of the Facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI), the facility failed to initiate a QAPI subsequent to identifying that staff had not been following physician orders or their policy for obtaining resident weights. The findings include:Please also reference F692An interview with the Director of Nursing (DNS) on 1/12/26 at 1:33 PM indicated the policy for obtaining admission weights directed upon admission, then weekly times 4 weeks then monthly. The DNS further indicated there was no good reason for failing to follow the facility policy or physician orders, the team met to discuss weights, but it was her responsibility to ensure compliance.An interview with the DNS and the Director of Clinical Services (RN # 5) on 1/14/26 at 12:15 PM identified that the Quality Measures for weights had not been triggered. Additionally, the DNS indicated that the facility had not identified the problem with obtaining accurate weights prior to the survey team identifying the problem. The Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that controlled medications were reconciled (assurance of the medication count being correct) with each shift change. The findings include: Review of the Controlled Substance Change of shift Audits on the A wing with the DNS on 11/8/23 at 12:15 PM identified that the month of September/2023 had a total of twelve missed signatures, and the month of October/2023 had thirteen missed signatures. The signatures are used to indicate that the controlled medication count was conducted and reconciled. Review of the Controlled Substance Change of Shift Audits on the C wing with the DNS on 11/8/23 at 12:15 PM identified that the month of August/2023 had fourteen missed signatures, and the month of September/2023 had six missed signatures. Interview with the Charge Nurse on the C wing (LPN #2) on 11/8/23 at 1:10 PM identified that the nurse on duty counts the controlled medications with the oncoming nurse at shift change and then they both sign the Controlled Substance Change of shift Audits to indicate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #43) reviewed for dementia care, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan was reviewed by the interdisciplinary team following the quarterly MDS assessment. The findings include: Resident #43's diagnoses included dementia, impulse disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #43 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living ranging from set up help to substantial assistance from staff. Review of Resident #43's care plan identified that the last review/revise date on the care plan was 3/9/23. There were no revisions and/or an indication that the care plan had been reviewed following the completion of the MDS assessment dated [DATE]. Review of the clinical record failed to identify that a care plan conference inclusive of the interdisciplinary team was conducted following the completion of the MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policy and interviews one of four medication carts, and two of two medication storage rooms, the facility failed to ensure that expired medications were removed from the medication cart and the medication storage rooms and failed to ensure the cleanliness of the medication cart. The findings include: Observation of the C Wing medication cart on 11/6/23 at 1:30 PM with LPN #2 (charge nurse) during a review of medication storage identified the following: Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate 160-4.5 microgram (mcg) inhaler for cough located in the mediation cart drawer with an expiration date of May 2023 (6 months past the expiration date). Interview with LPN #2 on 11/6/23 at 1:30 PM identified that the resident that was identified on the medication was no longer utilizing the medication and it should have been discarded. Interview with the DNS on 11/7/23 at 11:34 AM identified that if a resident is no longer taking a medication, the medication should be discarded or discontinued, and should not have been in the cart. Observation of the C/D Wing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$38,860 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $17,215 — penalty dated 2026-03-19
- $21,645 — penalty dated 2026-03-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RYDERS HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOPCHIK, KENNETH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 06/30/2006 |
| SBRIGLIO, MARTIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 06/30/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075271. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.