No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Douglas Manor

103 North Road, Windham, CT 06280 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (860) 423-4636 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (860) 423-4636 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2023Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0570)1 actual-harm citation$8,278 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0570)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-15)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
387 Tuckie Rd · (860) 456-1279 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
422 Windham Rd · (860) 423-3056 · Call to confirm hours
Park
82 S Windham Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.9%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%6.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.2%22.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.0%16.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.5%17.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.0%24.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.5%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.1%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.8%24.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%10.7%12.0%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.0%CMS range 39.2–60.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.2–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.0–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
31.7%
Total nursing turnover
10.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 82.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-22)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for falls, the facility failed to adherence to the care plan-specifically by ignoring repeated observations of the resident's forward leaning and rocking and leaving a roommate's wheelchair as an obstruction and to ensure a wheelchair that was not in use was positioned in a way to maintain a clutter-free environment and prevent the resident from sustaining a laceration to left eyelid when the resident leaned forward and fell out of the wheelchair resulting in transfer to the ED for the treatment and evaluation. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, muscle weakness, history of falls and macular degeneration (an eye disease that affects central vision). The Fall Risk Evaluation dated 6/4/25 identified that Resident #1 was at risk for falls. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/29/25 identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policies and interviews for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with dignity and respect when a staff member caused repeated discomfort when repositioning the resident and did not respect the resident's right to refuse care. The findings include:Resident #2's diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dysphagia, and depression.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 as moderately cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11), required maximum assistance with bed mobility, hygiene and dressing, and was bed bound.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/17/26 identified Resident #2 required assistance for hygiene, bathing, dressing, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. A BIMS score of fourteen (14) dated 3/20/26 identified Resident #2 as cognitively intact.The Social Service note dated 3/20/26 at 9:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for allegations of abuse, the facility failed to ensure concerns reported by a resident representative were identified, documented, and investigated through the grievance process in accordance with facility policy. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included intramedullary nailing following left intertrochanteric femur fracture, intellectual disability, and legal blindness.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 as cognitively intact (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13), independent with bed mobility, touching assistance with transfers, and required moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and dressing.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/29/26 identified Resident #1 was at risk for safety due to cognitive deficits and was legally blind. Interventions directed to introduce self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were at risk for falls, the facility failed to ensure a Fall Risk Evaluation was completed quarterly. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, muscle weakness, history of falls and macular degeneration (an eye disease that affects central vision). A Fall Risk Evaluation dated 6/4/25 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls. The Resident Care Plan dated 07/29/25 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls related to cognitive impairment, generalized weakness, previous history of falls, use of an antidepressant and a history of vertigo (a sensation that the environment around you is off balance and spinning in circles). Interventions included instructing the resident to request assistance prior to attempting to transfer or walk within his/her capacity to understand, keeping the area clutter free and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to complete a PASRR Level 2 screening when the initial screen expired causing a delay in Resident #1's transfer to another long term care facility. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and bipolar disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had some memory deficits and received anti-anxiety and anti-depressant medications. The PASRR Level 1 notice of action dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 received his/her approval for a period of seven (7) days and a Level 2 referral was not needed with this screening. The notice identified the admitting nursing facility was responsible for submitting the updated Level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for coordination of the plan of care, the facility failed provide the baseline and comprehensive care plans to the resident or the resident's family within forty-eight hours of admission to promote continuity of care and communication with the staff. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, and bipolar disorder. The baseline Resident Care Plan dated 5/28/25 identified Resident #1 had a colostomy, was incontinent of bladder, had bipolar disorder, and had a self-care deficit. Interventions directed to toilet the resident every two (2) hours, provide incontinent care, apply barrier protection after care, obtain lab work as ordered, administer medications as ordered, monitor behaviors, psychiatric consults as needed, and assist with daily living skills. The admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1) who was symptomatic for a urinary tract infection and had an order to collect a urine specimen, the facility failed to collect the urine at the time of the order or notify the physician of the delay with obtaining the specimen. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. The baseline Resident Care Plan dated 5/28/25 identified Resident #1 had a colostomy, was incontinent of bladder, and had a self-care deficit. Interventions directed to toilet the resident every two (2) hours, provide incontinent care, apply barrier protection after care, obtain lab work as ordered, and assist with daily living skills as needed. A physician's order dated 5/28/25 directed staff may straight catheterize Resident #1 if unable to obtain a urine specimen for urinalysis or culture and sensitivity as needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-22 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #37) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to include a resident in the development and implementation of a person-centered Resident Care Plan. The findings included: Resident #37 diagnoses included abnormal posture, spinal instabilities, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 was cognitively intact, required setup for eating and hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/4/25 failed to include resident discharge planning. Interview with the Director of Nurses (DNS) on 4/17/25 at 9:35 AM identified the facility does not currently have an MDS coordinator and the care planning and care plan schedules are created by the DNS, Rehabilitation Department, and social worker. Interview with Resident #37 on 4/17/25 at 9:45 AM identified staff had not discussed discharge home or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of facility documentation, and facility policy during a Resident Council meeting and review of Resident Council minutes, the facility failed to resolve ongoing issues with dietary, extended call bell wait times, locating staff for assistance, and inappropriate language used by staff. The findings include: Review of the Resident Council minutes for March 2024 through March 2025 identified that residents had dietary concerns in March 2024, May 2024, June 2024, July 2024, September 2024, October 2024, November 2024, December 2024, February 2025, and March 2025. Residents had concerns with staff using foul language in June 2024 and December 2024. Additionally, Residents had concerns with Nurse Aides for answering call bells, cell phone use on the units, breaks being taken at the same time, and the inability to locate staff when needed. During a Resident Council meeting conducted on 4/16/25 at 1:35 PM it was identified that the residents have been complaining about food issues for the past 2 years. Issues included taste, ability to get some items regularly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's Personal Funds Account, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to provide access to personal funds outside of the facilities posted banking hours. The findings include: Observation on 4/22/2025 at 11:00 AM identified a sign posted at the reception desk indicating banking hours were Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 7:00 PM, and Saturday and Sunday from 9:30 AM to 3:30 PM. Interview with the Business Office Manager on 4/22/2025 at 11:21 AM identified that residents had access to their personal bank account funds daily from 8:00 AM to 7:00 PM. The Business Office Manager reported that a petty cash lock box was kept at the reception desk to allow residents access to their funds when she was not available. She noted that, aside from herself, three facility receptionists had keys to the petty cash box. The Business Office Manager identified residents were unable to access their personal funds outside of the designated banking hours. Interview with Receptionist #1 on 4/22/2025 at 1:07 PM identified that the facility maintains a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy for 5 of 5 residents, (Resident #26, #30, #50, and #70), reviewed for Resident Care Planning (RCP), the facility failed to provide documentation that quarterly Resident Care Conferences (RCCs) were held and failed to ensure revisions to the Resident Care Plan (RCP) within 7 days after completion of the resident's comprehensive assessment. The findings include: 1. Resident #26's diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dementia, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #26 was dependent with personal hygiene, dressing, and rolling left and right. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 required substantial assistance with personal hygiene and dressing, and moderate assistance with rolling left and right. a. The RCP in effect from 11/12/2024 through 4/17/2025 failed to reflect the changes in the amount of assistance Resident #26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy for 2 of 2 residents (Resident#37 and #50) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to facilitate discharge. The findings included: 1. Resident # 37 diagnoses included abnormal posture, spinal instabilities, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 was cognitively intact, required setup for eating and hygiene and was dependent on staff for toileting, and transfers. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #37's overall goal was to return to the community and active discharge planning already occurred. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/4/25 failed to identify a discharge plan. Interview with Resident #37 on 4/14/25 at 9:53 AM identified that he/she was waiting for a representative from Money Follows the Person (MFP), (a federal Medicaid program designed to help individuals transition out of nursing homes into home and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy for medication storage and labeling, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked when unattended and narcotics were secured properly. The findings include: 1. An observation on 4/14/2025 at 10:00 AM identified an unattended and unlocked medication cart outside the door of room [ROOM NUMBER] in the hallway. Two unsupervised residents were in the hallway, 1 resident rolled past the unlocked cart in his/her wheelchair. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 4/14/25 at 10:13 AM identified that she forgot to lock the medication cart before entering a different room to provide routine care for a resident because she was rushing. She indicated she was aware of the facility policy to lock medication carts when not in use, not in view, and unattended. 2. An observation on 4/14/2025 at 11:22 AM identified an unattended and unlocked medication cart and an unattended and unlocked treatment cart in the Frog Lane hallway. An observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-22 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 4 of 5 employee files, the facility failed to ensure that the mandatory employee training/in-services were completed. The findings include: 1. LPN #1's date of hire was 11/11/2021. Review of facility documentation for LPN #1 identified that she worked in the facility between 11/11/2021 and 4/22/25. Review of the employee file for LPN #1 failed to identify that in-service training had been provided (Resident Rights, Communication and Behavioral Health) and included in the files from 2023 until present. 2. NA #1's date of hire was 8/8/2019. Review of facility documentation for NA #1 identified that she worked in the facility between 8/8/2019 and 4/22/25. Review of the employee file for NA #1 failed to identify that in-service training had been provided (Resident Rights, Communication and Behavioral Health) and included in the files from 2023 until present. 3. NA #3's date of hire was 10/11/2023. Review of facility documentation for NA #3 identified that she worked in the facility between 10/11/2023 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #37) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure the resident's wheelchair of choice was able to be utilized. The findings include: Resident #37 diagnoses included abnormal posture, spinal instabilities, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 was cognitively intact, required setup for eating and hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/5/25 identified Resident #37 required modified wheelchair positioning for proper body alignment. Interventions included referral to therapy as needed for change in wheelchair positioning, monitor for complaints of pain or evidence for skin breakdown, and transfer out of bed into the modified wheelchair as ordered. A physician's order dated 4/14/25 directed Resident #37 was to be out of bed to the adapted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #19), sampled for advanced directives, the facility failed to identify a code status in the electronic health record. The findings included: Resident #19's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia and dysphagia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #19 was moderately cognitively impaired, and required substantial/ maximal assistance with dressing, eating and repositioning in bed. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/10/25 identified Resident #19's advance care planning code status was DNR/DNI/RNP (do not resuscitate, do not in tubate, Registered Nurse may pronounce). Interventions included a physician's order and documentation of the resident's code status and advance care planning in the resident's clinical record. The Resident Advance Directives form signed 3/7/24 identified Resident #19 had a code status of do not resuscitate (DNR). The physicians' orders failed to identify a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 sampled residents, (Resident #28 and Resident #63), reviewed for abuse, for Resident #28, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of funds, and for Resident #63, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #28's diagnosis included depression, stroke, and spinal cord dysfunction. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating cognition was intact, was independent with eating after set up, was dependent on staff for dressing and transfers, and used a wheelchair for mobility. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/10/2024 identified Resident #28 had impaired Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) requiring assistance related to a history of a stroke. Interventions directed staff to assist with bathing, dressing, and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #28) reviewed for personal property, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation of funds, and for the only sampled resident (Resident #63) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect, investigate an allegation of neglect in a timely manner, and prevent access to the resident by the staff member following the allegation of neglect. The findings include: 1. Resident #28's diagnosis included depression, stroke, and spinal cord dysfunction. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating cognition was intact, was independent with eating after set up, was dependent on staff for dressing and transfers, and used a wheelchair for mobility. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/10/2024 identified Resident #28 had impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident, (Resident #28), reviewed for urinary catheter care, the facility failed to perform weekly skin assessments; for the only sampled resident, (Resident #35), reviewed for positioning, the facility failed to ensure a positioning plan for a resident in a customized wheelchair was followed, for the only sampled resident, (Resident #42), reviewed for a non-pressure skin related condition, the facility failed to report a change in a resident's skin condition to a licensed nurse, and for 2 of 2 sampled residents, (Resident #28 and #63) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care. The findings included: 1. Resident #28's diagnosis included stroke, spinal cord dysfunction, and hemiplegia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review for 1 of 3 sampled residents, (Resident #68), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to follow a post fall care plan for safety interventions. The findings included: Resident # 68 diagnoses included dementia, lack of coordination, and Parkinsonism. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #68 was moderately cognitively impaired, and required partial/moderate assistance with transfers, toileting, and changing position in bed. The Resident Care Plan dated 3/15/25 identified that Resident #68 was a fall/safety risk. Interventions included keeping the bed at the lowest position and place floor pads to each side of bed. The Accident and Incident Reportable Event dated 12/21/24 identified Resident #68 was found on the floor next to the bed on 12/21/24 at 7:30 AM positioned on her/his right shoulder, stating she/he was getting out of bed and slipped due to a tissue that was on the floor. Observations on 4/15/25 at 9:14 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical record, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #133) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a resident who received oxygen. The findings include: Resident #133 was newly admitted , diagnosis included a fracture of the sacrum, muscle weakness and difficulty walking. The admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #133 was cognitively alert, lungs were clear, denied shortness of breath, and was not on oxygen. The Resident Care Plan initiated on 4/11/2025 identified Resident #133 was at risk for cardiac issues related to hypertension. Interventions included administering oxygen as ordered, administering medications as ordered, and observing for signs and symptoms of cardiac/respiratory distress. Observation of Resident #133 on 4/14/2025 at 12:16 PM identified the administration of oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Interview and review of the clinical record with LPN #7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy for the only sampled Resident, (Resident #30), reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to accurately assess the residents oral status upon admission, failed to include a comprehensive Resident Care Plan (RCP) related to oral status, failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately related to dentition, and failed to ensure dental services were provided, as required, according to payor type. The findings include: Resident #30's diagnoses included epilepsy, left sided hemiplegia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A. The Nursing Clinical admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 had all his/her own teeth, did not have dentures or partials, but failed to include an examination of Resident #30's oral/dental status. B. Review of the RCP in effect from 7/7/2023 through 4/17/2025 failed to address Resident #30's edentulous (without teeth) status. C. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy for 2 residents requiring precautions (Resident #15, #70), who were reviewed for infection control practices, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate precaution sign was placed outside the door for 2 residents with a history of a Multi Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) and 1 resident with an indwelling medical device. The findings include: 1. Resident #15's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, frequent urinary tract infections, and type 2 diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, was dependent on upper and lower body dressing and toileting hygiene and required maximal assistance with rolling left and right. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/17/2025 identified Resident #15 had a history of a MDRO, Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) who were reviewed for an allegation of potential physical abuse, the facility failed to report the allegation to the Administrator and/or his/her designee immediately and to the state agency within two (2) hours after the resident reported the allegation to another staff member. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included traumatic brain injury and left-side hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating some memory recall deficits and required maximum assistance of two (2) staff for mobility and activities of daily living. The nurse aide care card identified Resident #2 as at risk for falls and required two (2) staff members for care and transfers with the Sara lift. The nurse's note dated 2/13/25 at 11:06 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) who were reviewed for an allegation of potential abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was transferred utilizing a mechanical device (Sara lift) and two (2) person assistance. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included traumatic brain injury and left-side hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis). The Resident Care Plan revised on 11/12/24 identified Resident #2 was at risk for decreased mobility and falls. Interventions directed two (2) staff to provide care, and transfer with a mechanical device (Sara lift) and two (2) person assistance. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating some memory recall deficits and required maximum assistance of two (2) staff for mobility and activities of daily living. The nurse aide care card identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff removed smoking paraphernalia in a resident's possession timely when a resident was found in possession of smoking paraphernalia including lighters. The findings include: Record review identified Resident #2 was admitted to the facility during 11/2023 and responsible for him/herself. Resident #2's diagnoses included anxiety, depression and nicotine dependence. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment, was supervision for ambulation, and independent with manual wheelchair use. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/8/2024 identified Resident #2 was a recent smoker and declined use of a nicotine patch. Interventions directed facility smoking policy, smoking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for falls, the facility failed to complete an assessment on a resident who had a fall with a subsequent injuries. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, syncope and collapse, transient cerebral ischemic attack (stroke), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate) and unsteadiness in the feet. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision for bed mobility, moderate assistance for transfers and was dependent with toileting. Additionally, it identified that the resident had a history of falls prior to admission to the facility. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/12/23 identified that Resident #1 was a fall/safety risk with interventions that included keeping the call bell within reach, encouraging the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls (Resident #2), the facility failed to supervise a resident in the bathroom who was cognitively impaired and required assistance, resulting in a fall with injury. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, a history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two (2) for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. Additionally, it indicated that the resident had a history of falls, one of which resulted in a major injury in the facility. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/3/21 identified that Resident #2 was at risk for falls due to impaired mobility, incontinence and impaired safety awareness with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #20 and 479) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to ensure the grievance policy was followed for a complaint regarding medications; and failed to ensure a grievance was completed when the resident reported missing personal items. The findings included: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included migraines, osteoarthritis and pain of both hips, polyneuropathy, bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had intact cognition and frequent pain limiting his/her day-to-day activities and sleep at night. The care plan dated 1/20/23 identified the resident had polyneuropathy and left shoulder pain. Interventions included to monitor pain, administer medications as ordered, monitor and document effects of pain medications. Interview with Resident #20 on 3/6/23 at 11:00 AM indicated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interview, the facility failed to conduct nursing staff competencies for years 2021 and 2022. Further, based on facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate staff education and competency skills during an 11 month COVID-19 outbreak and failed to ensure competency for glucose testing and handwashing. The findings include: 1. Interview and review of facility documentation with the DNS on 3/10/23 at 10:40 AM failed to reflect competencies for 2021 and 2022 had been completed. The DNS identified that multiple changes in the facility's staff development personnel, combined with the additional responsibilities associated with the Covid 19 pandemic as key factors in the facility's inability to complete clinical competencies. Although requested, the policy regarding staff competencies was not provided. 2. Interview and review of facility documentation with the Infection Control Nurse (RN#2) on 3/13/23 at 2:48 PM identified that he had been employed at the facility since December 2022. RN #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-13 · tag F0810 — pattern
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #3) and 9 of 10 other residents who utilize adaptive equipment (Resident #14, 17, 35, 41, 48, 51, 54, 65, and 71) the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment was provided during a GI outbreak (13 days). The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dysphasia, Parkinson's disease, and dementia. Facility documentation dated 10/5/22 identified Resident #3 weighed 118.6 lbs. Facility documentation dated 1/1/23 identified Resident #3 weighed 108.2 lbs. Physician's monthly orders for February 2023 directed to provide a lactose reduced diet, puree texture, nectar thick liquids, no bread, and 1:1 feed for all meals. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition and was totally dependent on staff for eating. The care plan dated 2/28/23 identified the resident had weight loss and to provide the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to record the dishwashing temperature for 2 meals during a facility GI outbreak. The findings include: The facility was in an ongoing GI outbreak since 3/1/23, impacting 41 residents, with 20 residents having been resolved as of 3/4/23 and 4 resolved 3/6/23, as 17 residents continued to remain symptomatic with symptoms of nausea, vomiting and or diarrhea. Review of the dishwashing temperature log identified no documentation of food temperatures on 3/2/23 and 3/3/23 for dinner. Interview with the Dietary Supervisor on 3/6/23 at 10:10 AM identified the dishwashing temperatures for dinner on both for 3/2/23 and 3/3/23 were not documented on the dishwasher temperature log. The Dietary Supervisor identified it is the responsibility of dietary staff to log the temperature with each meal and he did not know why it wasn't documented. The facility policy indicates that dishwasher temperatures will be monitored and recorded 3 times a day by dietary aide.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews reviewed for infection control practices during multiple, concurrent outbreaks, the facility staff failed to redirect a visitor lacking Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use, failed to implement appropriate environmental disinfecting following a lack of PPE use and lack of handwashing, failed to initiate timely contact tracing for a newly identified COVID-19 positive resident, failed to test COVID-19 symptomatic residents per CDC guidelines, failed to separate a COVID-19 symptomatic resident from a roommate, failed to maintain COVID-19 isolation protocols in accordance with standards, failed to appropriately cohort a resident with a multidrug resistant resident (MDRO) history, failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene with glove use, failed to follow appropriate blood glucose monitoring testing procedures, failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions for cleaning a glucose monitoring device. The findings include: Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 residents (Resident #3 and 62) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure dignified care related to dining and urinary catheters. The findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dysphasia, Parkinson's disease, and dementia. Facility documentation dated 10/5/22 identified Resident #3 weighed 118.6 lbs. Facility documentation dated 1/1/23 identified Resident #3 weighed 108.2 lbs. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition and was totally dependent on staff for eating. The care plan dated 2/28/23 identified to provide the resident a nosey cup (adapted drinking cup) for all meals, 1:1 feeding assistance, encourage at least 50% intake of meal and offer substitute if the resident doesn't eat greater than 50%. Review of the nurse aide care card, undated, for Resident #3 identified the resident required a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #62 and 65) reviewed for resident rights, the facility failed the ensure the resident or resident representative had the opportunity to participate in the process of care planning and making decisions about his or her care; and failed to complete a care plan meeting following admission. The findings included: 1. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, cardiomyopathy, and chronic kidney disease. The care plan dated 10/27/22 identified essential support people for Resident #62 with interventions to have the essential support people review the plan of care with each care conference and staff to educate the essential support people. A care conference social worker quarterly note dated 10/27/22 at 11:24 indicated the care conference included the care plan nurse, social worker, and the family member. Resident #62 just had a re-admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #20) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the physician or APRN when medications were administered outside of the ordered time. The findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included migraines, osteoarthritis and pain of both hips, polyneuropathy, bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had intact cognition and had frequent pain limiting his/her day-to-day activities and sleep at night. The care plan dated 1/20/23 identified pain management for polyneuropathy and left shoulder pain. Interventions included to monitor pain, administer medications as ordered, and monitor and document effects of pain medications. An APRN #1 progress note dated 1/29/23 identified Resident #20 was seen for increased acute and chronic pain with history of osteoarthritis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #3 and 36) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in November 2020 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. Facility documentation dated 4/21/21 identified the facility had contracted with a local nursing school to allow clinical site training by the LPN students in the program. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and eating. A reportable event form dated 5/26/21 identified the Registered Nurse Nursing Instructor, (Nursing Instructor #1) reported a student nurse, (Student Nurse #6) had been rough during care with Resident #3 and the incident had been witnessed by another student nurse on 5/18/21, 8 days earlier.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse/mistreatment to the state agency. The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in November 2020 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. Facility documentation dated 4/21/21 identified the facility had contracted with a local nursing school to allow clinical site training by the LPN students in the program. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and eating. A reportable event form dated 5/26/21 identified the Registered Nurse Nursing Instructor, (Nursing Instructor #1) reported a student nurse, Student Nurse #6 was rough during care with Resident #3 and the incident had been witnessed by another student nurse on 5/18/21. Resident #3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #529) who was reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review 2 (PASSR 2), the facility failed to implement a PASSR 2 recommendation. Review of PASSR 2 identified the following rehabilitative service recommendations: Service or Support for socialization, leisure and recreation activities; mental health counseling; ongoing evaluation of the effectiveness of current psychotropic medications on target symptoms; supportive counseling from NF staff; a guardian/conservator for decisions regarding health and safety, and training in ADL's. All recommendations care planned except for appointment of guardian/conservator for decisions related to health and safety. 3/7/2023 at 10:00 am: Interview with Social Worker identified nothing has been done regarding the PASSR recommendation for guardianship/conservatorship for Resident #529. Social Worker stated resident #529 was alert and oriented and would do well with a power of attorney appointment. Social Worker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #62 and 65) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to revise and update the comprehensive care plan with a significant change of condition; and failed to complete a comprehensive care plan within seven days of completing a comprehensive assessment. The findings include: 1. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, cardiomyopathy, and chronic kidney disease. The care plan dated 10/27/22 identified essential support people for Resident #62 with interventions to have the essential support people review the plan of care with each care conference and staff to educate the essential support people. A care conference social worker quarterly note dated 10/27/22 at 11:24 indicated the care conference included the care plan nurse, social worker, and the family member. Resident #62 just had a re-admission from the hospital and on antibiotics. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) was conducted when required and by qualified staff per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included gastro-esophageal reflux disease and dementia. A physician's order dated 9/23/22 directed to administer Reglan (medication for the stomach) 5 mg before meals. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #58 had severely impaired cognition. The care plan dated 11/15/22 identified potential for gastro-intestinal distress. Interventions included to provide medications as ordered and to perform an AIMS as ordered. Review of the clinical record failed to reflect an AIMS test had been completed subsequent to the initiation of Reglan on 9/23/22. Interview with MD #1 on 3/8/23 at 7:00 AM identified he was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for the only sampled resident reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure weekly showers or bed baths were given to a dependent resident. The findings included: Resident #479's diagnoses included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and depression. Interview with Person #1 on 3/9/23 at 9:30 AM, indicated Resident #479 was not showered consistently, was not clean, and his/her skin had an odor. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #479 had intact cognition and was dependent for toileting, hygiene, and bathing. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/13/22 identified Resident #479 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to his/her impaired mobility. Interventions directed facility staff to assist Resident #479 with bathing, dressing, and hygiene as ordered. Additional interventions directed facility staff to use a mechanical lift for transfers and a 2 person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #20 and 479) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were given in a timely manner; and failed to ensure medications were given as ordered. The findings include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included migraines, osteoarthritis and pain of both hips, polyneuropathy, bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had intact cognition and had frequent pain limiting his/her day-to-day activities and sleep at night. The care plan dated 1/20/23 identified pain management for polyneuropathy and left shoulder pain. Interventions included to monitor pain, administer medications as ordered, and monitor and document effects of pain medications. A physician's order dated 2/23/23 directed to administer Tramadol 50 mg tablet every 12 hours for pain, Fioricet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury, the facility failed to ensure an accurate pressure ulcer assessment and failed to conduct weekly wound measurements. The findings include: Resident #479 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An admission nurse's note dated 2/3/22 at 1:30 PM identified an admission skin assessment that Resident #479 had 3 skin areas: a stage 2 sacral pressure ulcer that measured 13 centimeters (cm) by 7 cm, a right heel area (unspecified skin description) that measured 3 cm. by 3 cm., and a left heel area (unspecified skin description) lacking a measurement. Physician's orders dated 2/3/22 directed weekly skin checks and evaluations on bath/shower day, cleanse the Stage 2, coccyx pressure ulcer with normal saline, pat dry, apply TRIAD paste followed by a dry clean dressing once daily and as needed. The physician's order failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the dietitian completed nutrition assessments after a change in condition and/or quarterly. The findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in October 2018 with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, depressive disorder, and delusional disorder. Reviewed of the weight summary dated 8/9/22 identified Resident #10 weighed 108.9 lbs. Reviewed of the weight summary dated 9/3/22 identified Resident #10 weighed 106.8 lbs. Reviewed of the weight summary for the month of October 2022 failed to reflect documentation of a weight Resident #10. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision with eating. A nurse's note dated 10/12/22 at 2:42 PM identified Resident #10 was noted to have a fractured tooth on the lower left side of the mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for pain management, the facility failed to ensure medications to treat pain were administered per physician's orders upon resident request. The findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included migraines, osteoarthritis and pain of both hips, and polyneuropathy. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had intact cognition and had frequent pain limiting his/her day-to-day activities and sleep at night. The care plan dated 1/20/23 identified pain management for polyneuropathy and left shoulder pain. Interventions included to monitor pain, administer medications as ordered, monitor and document effects of pain medications. APRN #1 progress note dated 1/29/23 identified Resident #20 was seen for increased acute and chronic pain with history of osteoarthritis, and complaints of spasms. APRN added an order the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy, and interviews during a review of facility immunizations records for four of five Residents (Resident #'s 16, 18, 43 and 71), the facility failed to offer and provide influenza and pneumococcal immunizations as required. The findings include: Interview and review of facility immunization documentation with the Infection Control Nurse, RN#2, on 3/13/2023 at 8:52 AM identified the following: 1. Resident #16's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, cerebral infarction, and diabetes mellitus. Review of physician's order identified a standing order since 11/30/2022 to offer the flu vaccine. 2. Resident #18's diagnoses included hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and presence of a cardiac pacemaker. 3. Resident #43's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, cerebral infarction, and hypertensive heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #43 was cognitively intact. Interview with Resident #43 on 3/9/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-13 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility documentation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that COVID-19 vaccination information was stored securely. The findings include: On 3/07/23 at 10:30 AM an observation of the Infection Control Office failed to ensure that staff and resident COVID-19 documents were secured from access by residents and staff. The office doors were unlocked and open and staff were not present in the office or outside in the adjacent hall. Interview with RN #2 on 3/07/23 at 10:49 AM indicated that the COVID-19 employee and patient records of vaccination status were kept locked in the Infection prevention office at all times due to HIPAA (to safeguard health information), however, RN#2 was unaware that the door needed to remain closed and locked if he was not in the office but in the building. A second observation on 3/09/23 at 3:17 PM identified that the Infection Prevention Office doors were left unlocked and open to the hall, without facility staff present, and that COVID-19 vaccination for both residents and staff was accessible and unprotected. Although…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of the kitchen and dietary services and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. The findings included: During initial tour of the kitchen on 02/02/20 at 9:17 AM, it was identified that three water bottles that belonged to the dietary staff were being stored in the walk-in refrigerator designated for facility food storage. During a subsequent observation of the kitchen on 02/05/20, it was identified that there was a water bottle and a lunch bag belonging to dietary staff being stored in the walk-in refrigerator designated for facility food storage. Observations on all days of survey 02/02/20, 02/03/20, 02/04/20 and 02/05/20 identified the dietary staff utilized Quat 64 to clean and sanitize the food preparation surfaces. The dietary staff identified the spray bottle being utilized as Quat 64. Interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 02/05/20 identified that the dietary staff's personal food items should not be stored in the facility's walk-in refrigerator that stored the facility's food supply because it is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 4 of 10 sampled residents (Residents #3, #31, #72, and #180) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that pneumococcal vaccination history was complete and pneumococcal vaccinations and education concerning the vaccinations were offered. Findings include: Interview on 2/4/2020 at approximately 12:00 PM with the Infection Preventionist (IP) during the time of the record reviews identified that she was in the process of updating all residents' pneumococcal immunization status' and noted that she had not completed the information gathering on all of the residents at that time. Further interview with the IP identified that the facility has a form that is completed by the resident or resident representative that provides information about the pneumococcal immunizations. She further noted that the form has an area where the resident or their representative can provide consent or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #71) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from verbal abuse. The findings include: Resident #71's diagnoses included, anxiety, chronic pain, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, congestive heart failure and abnormal posture. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #71 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of two with bed mobility, transfers and personal hygiene. The assessment further noted the resident did not ambulate, and had a range of motion impairment to one side of the upper extremities. The Reportable Event summary report dated 01/06/20 identified that on 12/30/19 at 7:15 PM Resident #71 was being transferred to bed via a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) by NA#4 and NA#5. During the transfer NA#5 and Resident #71 had a verbal altercation where both parties used profanity in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #50), reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to report a potential misappropriation of funds to the state agency. The findings include: Resident #50's diagnoses included dementia and anxiety disorder. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #50 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of one for transfers, dressing and toileting, had no behaviors, delusions or hallucinations. The care plan dated 4/5/19 identified the problem of dementia, impaired decision making and impaired memory with interventions that included, provide reality orientation and validation as needed. A grievance/concern form dated 5/7/19 identified Resident #50 stated he/she was missing a Christmas box that contained $35.00 and two to three Walmart gift cards for $20.00 each. The form further identified that the responsible party was refunded the money. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview for one of three sampled residents (Resident #71) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to implement its policy to ensure the resident was protected after an allegation of verbal abuse was identified. The findings included: Resident #71's diagnoses included, anxiety, chronic pain, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, congestive heart failure abnormal posture. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #71 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of two with bed mobility, transfers and personal hygiene. The assessment further noted the resident did not ambulate, had a range of motion impairment to one side of the upper extremities The Reportable Event summary report dated 01/06/20 identified that on 12/30/19 at 7:15 PM Resident #71 was being transferred to bed via a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) by NA#4 and NA#5. During the transfer NA#5 and Resident #71 had a verbal altercation where both parties used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-04-22 · tag F0570 — widespread
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's Personal Funds Account, review of facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure necessary coverage through a surety bond for the Resident Trust Accounts. The findings include: On 4/22/2025 at 11:21 AM, interview and review of the Resident Trust Account (RTA) balances with the Business Office Manager indicated that the RTA balance for the period of 10/1/2024 to 3/31/2025 ranged from $50,280.00 dollars to $119,643.34. During this time period, the RTA exceeded the surety bond value every month. The RTA balance for the period of 10/1/2024 - 10/31/2024 indicated a balance ranging from $73,816.80 to $114,629.60. The RTA balance for the period of 11/1/2024 - 11/30/2024 indicated a balance ranging from $75,505.75 to $99,861.55. The RTA balance for the period of 12/1/2024 - 12/31/2024 indicated a balance ranging from $76,472.47 to $122,434.28. The RTA balance for the period of 1/1/2025 - 1/31/2025 indicated a balance ranging from $50,280.00 to $119, 643.34. The RTA balance for the period of 2/1/2025 - 2/28/2025 indicated a balance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-04-22 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's Personal Funds Account, review of facility documentation, and interviews for 13 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #3, #11, #14, #22, #30, #39, #45, #48, #49, #60, #62, #66, and #71), the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives with quarterly financial statements for personal funds held by the facility. The findings include: 1. Resident #3's diagnoses included osteoporosis, vertebral wedge compression fracture, and a cerebral infarction. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #3 had clear speech and could usually understand and be understood by others. Resident #3 was responsible for him/herself. 2. Resident #11's diagnoses included dementia, dysphasia, and traumatic brain injury. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 had a BIMS score of 2 indicating severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-03-13 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury, (Resident #16) and for 1 of 5 resident reviewed for immunizations, (Resident #479), the facility failed to correctly code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The findings include: 1. Resident #16's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, cerebral infarction, and diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #16 was mildly cognitively impaired and was offered and declined the influenza vaccine. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/17/2023 identified Resident #16 refused care and medications, preferred to stay in bed, and declined vaccines. Interventions directed to document refusals and update MD/APRN as needed regarding refusals, offer alternatives/accommodations to resident to encourage compliance, and accept resident right to refuse. A standing physician's order since 11/20/2022 directed to administer Flulaval Quadrivalent Suspension one time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2020-02-05 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and interviews, for three of four sampled nurse aides (NA) (NA #1, NA #2, and NA #3), reviewed as part of the sufficient and competent nursing staff review, the facility failed to ensure performance evaluations on a yearly basis. The findings include: Review of facility documentation and interview on 02/04/20 at 11:42 AM with the Director of Human Resources identified the following: NA #1 had a hire date of 4/11/17 and a yearly performance evaluation dated 2/16/18, the next noted performance evaluation was dated 11/8/19, making the yearly performance evaluation nine months late. NA #2 had a hire date of 7/26/17 and a yearly performance evaluation dated 1/13/18, the next noted performance evaluation was dated 10/17/19, making the yearly performance evaluation nine months late. NA #3 had a re-hire date of 5/17/18 with no yearly performance evaluations since, which makes the yearly performance evaluation seven months late. The Director of Human Resources further identified that the 2019 evaluations were partially completed and the parts of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-10-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RYDERS HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SBRIGLIO, MARTINIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST51%since 05/17/2018
SCHWARTZ, RUSSELLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 05/17/2018
THOMAS, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 05/17/2018
FARMER, MICHELLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/17/2018
KRIJGSMAN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/17/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 5%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$376per resident / day
operating cost
$11,432per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$372per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075258. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next