Bel-Air Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 191 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 73.0 residents a day — about 103% occupied, or roughly -2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was found unresponsive during the dinner meal, was promptly identified as a choking victim. The facility staff failed to administer the Heimlich maneuver. Upon Emergency Medical Service arrival, two whole grapes were suctioned from Resident #1's airway by EMS staff, the resident was subsequently hospitalized for a choking episode resulting in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. Please cross reference F 805 The finding included: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dysphagia, hemiplegia affecting right side dominant side, aphasia, and a cerebral infarction. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, was on a mechanically altered diet, and required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living. The care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for diet consistency, the facility failed to ensure the resident was served the physician ordered diet consistency with a subsequent choking episode resulting in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. Please cross reference F 684 Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that include dysphagia, hemiplegia affecting right side dominant side, aphasia, and cerebral infarction. The annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, was on a mechanically altered diet, and required extensive assistance with Activities of daily living. The care plan dated 10/26/2023 identified Resident #1 had dysphagia related to a cerebral vascular accident with interventions that directed to provide a mechanical soft diet with thin liquids and set up and assist as needed. A physician's order dated 1/1/2024 directed to provide Resident #1 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and facility documentation for three (3) of three (3) residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure residents blood glucose levels were obtained before meals and failed to ensure insulin was administered before meals according to provider order. The findings included: 1a. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 and had diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A physician's order dated 4/23/25 directed Lispro (a short-acting insulin) administration per sliding scale (two (2) units for a blood glucose level of 151-200, four (4) units for a blood glucose level of 201-250, six (6) units for a blood glucose level of 251-300, eight (8) units for a blood glucose level of 301-350, ten (10) units for a blood glucose level of 351-400, and to notify the provider of blood glucose levels greater than 400) before meals and at bedtime for diabetes.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the tour of the Dietary Department, interview and facility documentation, the facility failed to identify expiration dates for dry stock and frozen items. The findings included: Tour of the Dietary Department on 5/9/25 at 12:05 PM with the Dietary Manager identified the following: a. The basement dry stock contained 16 individual bags of sliced white breads with no expiration date, 2 (1-gallon) coleslaw dressing jars with no expiration date and 4 (1-pound) cans of chicken base that lacked an expiration date. b. The walk-in basement freezer contained 12 packages of hot dog buns with no expiration date, 12 packages of hamburger buns with no expiration date, 2 plastic wrapped 5-pound beef chucks with no expiration dates, a 1 5-pound bag of chicken tenders with no expiration date and a 10-pound bag of chicken breast with no expiration date. Interview with the Dietary Director on 5/9/25 at 12:56 PM failed to identify the policy on expiration dates, and stated they were most likely on the boxes they were delivered in, but due to lack of room in the facility, items were removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of four residents (Resident #24) reviewed for pressure ulcers and one out of three residents (Resident #40) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to notify the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) and family/responsible party of a significant weight loss. The findings include: 1. Resident #24 had diagnoses that included dysphagia, the presence of a cardiac pacemaker and dementia. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/16/25 identified Resident #24 had a history of pressure wounds and was at risk for oral/nutritional problems with a goal to not have a weight loss. Interventions included weight as ordered and per facility protocol, and Registered Dietician (RD) evaluation as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #24 was severely cognitively impaired, required substantial/maximal assistance with for eating and was dependent for personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident (Resident #25) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to notify state and local authorities of an allegation of neglect. The findings include: Resident #25 was admitted with diagnoses that included cancer that spread to the bone, major depression and post-traumatic stress syndrome. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #24 was alert and oriented and was independent for personal hygiene, ambulation with a walker and transfer. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/25/25 identified Resident #25 had a history of anxiety and depression. Interventions included observing for periods of anxiety or sadness, provide a calm, quiet environment and encourage Resident #25 to verbalize thoughts and feelings related to anxiety. A facility grievance/concern form dated 4/15/25, noted Resident #25 reported that a call bell was ringing in another…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, observations, review of the clinical record and facility policy for 1 of 5 sampled resident (Resident #5) reviewed for side rails and for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #53) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Care Plan (RCP) was comprehensive to include side rail padding (Resident #5) and refusals for positioning (Resident #53). The findings include: 1. Resident #5's diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, generalized muscle weakness and cachexia (irreversible weight and muscle loss). A physician's order dated 11/9/20 and currently in effect directed for quarter (¼) side-rails to be in place to both sides of the bed for mobility and transfer ability. A side rail evaluation dated 3/2/23 identified that a side-rail was indicated for enhancement of mobility and that the resident expressed a desire for a side-rail. It reported that side-rails were not indicated to provide safety for Resident #5 and that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure that the expiration date was checked on a narcotic medication prior to administration. The findings include: Resident #23's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, chronic pain and type 2 diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy. A physician's order dated 3/20/25 directed to administer Morphine Sulfate Extended Release (ER) 15 milligram (mg) oral tablet by mouth every eight (8) hours for chronic pain, as part of a 45 mg dose (received in combination with a 30 mg tablet) and to hold for sedation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 had intact cognition and was independent with eating, personal care and bed mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/10/25 identified Resident #23 had pain related to cancer, a history of chronic pain and was receiving Morphine and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record and policy review for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #40) sampled for nutrition, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to obtain weekly weights and a reweight on a resident with a significant weight loss. The findings included: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses that included dysphagia, aphasia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A physician's order dated 4/21/25 directed to weigh Resident #40 weekly on his/her shower day. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/23/25 identified Resident #40 had impaired utilization of nutrients related to diabetes mellitus, stroke, no teeth, puree diet, and elevated blood pressure with risk for weight loss and unplanned weight loss, muscle loss related to diet texture dislike and refusing to eat puree meats. Interventions included diet and fluids as ordered, magic cup supplement with lunch, weights as ordered per facility protocol, registered dietician evaluation as needed, speech therapy as needed, monitor dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication carts and medication storage room were free from unlabeled and expired medications and non-medication items and that medications were stored properly. The findings include: 1. Observation and interview on 5/9/25 at 11:38 AM in the South Wing Medication room with the DNS, identified house stock medications including a box of 100 capsules of Diphenhydramine (an antihistamine and/or sedative medication) 25 milligram (mg) expired 11/2024, and a box of Beneprotein 0.25 ounce packets expired 7/2023. Opened, unlabeled and undated medications were identified as Miconazole Nitrate 2 percent (%) cream and Lactulose (a medication used as a laxative or to treat liver disease) 10 grams (g) in 15 milliliters (mL) solution. Food items were observed to be stored in the medication room cabinets alongside house stock medications included a basket of coffee creamers and sugar/sugar substitute packets, and a foam take out container with plastic utensils inside. Drawers of the medication room were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure that meal percentages were consistently being documented for a resident with significant weight loss. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, dysphagia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance for bed mobility. Additionally, the MDS identified that Resident #1 had a weight loss of 5 percent (%) or more in the last month or a loss of 10 % or more in the last 6 months. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/28/25 identified Resident #1 had severe protein calorie malnutrition related to severe weight loss, dysphagia, loss of muscle and fat, low Body Mass Index (BMI) and blood work indicating inflammation despite intake being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #23 and Resident #44) who transferred to the hospital and were reviewed for Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDROs), the facility failed ensure at the time of transfer to an acute care hospital the MDRO colonization status, special instructions or precautions for ongoing care related to the MDRO were communicated to the receiving hospital. The findings include: 1. Resident #23 was admitted with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A lab result dated 6/24/24 identified Resident #23's sputum was positive for Extended- spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL-enzymes that identify antibiotic resistance) bacteria (Klebsiella) and Methicillin (antibiotic) resistance bacteria (staphylococcus) or MRSA. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 was alert and oriented and was independent for personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-02-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RYDERS HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT