Inn At Freedom Village, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 433 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 153 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 87.9 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.05 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure staff were competent to provide direct care to a resident with behaviors due to dementia for one (Resident #1) out of three residents sampled.Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 03/09/2026 showed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Parkinsonism, anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility for short term rehabilitation. Resident #1 was successfully discharged home according to the plan on 3/3/2026. Review of a Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 09 which indicated Moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's care plan did not reveal a plan of care to deal with Resident #1's behaviors related to dementia. Review of a nursing progress note dated 2/20/2026 showed, Patient combative with care tonight. Bowel movement smeared all over…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure a controlled prescribed medication was available for one (#1) out of three residents.Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's admission Record showed an admit date of 02/14/2026 and a discharge date of 03/03/2026 to home. Upon further review, Resident #1 had diagnoses to include but not limited to Parkinsonism unspecified, anxiety disorder unspecified and unspecified dementia unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. A record review of Resident #1's hospital discharge medications include the following but not limited to Clonazepam 0.5 mg (milligram) oral tablet one tablet by mouth daily as needed for anxiety. A record review of Resident #1's physician orders include but not limited to Clonazepam tablet 0.5 mg give one tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for anxiousness related to anxiety disorder unspecified for 14 days, ordered 02/14/2026. A record review of Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/21/2026, Section C-Cognition showed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure food service equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition in two of two kitchen freezers. Findings included: On 7/15/24 at 9:44 a.m. a kitchen tour was conducted with the Director of Dining Services and the Assistant Director of Dining Services/Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). At 9:54 a.m. an observation of the large walk-in freezer revealed ice build-up on the floor upon walking in. Further observation of the large walk-in freezer revealed ice build-up and condensation throughout the freezer to include on top of racks and boxes of food items. The large walk-in freezer revealed icicles and ice build-up on the ceiling and floor. Observations of the back of the large walk-in freezer, by the blower unit, revealed icicles and ice build-up. The Director of Dining Services stated there were work orders for the large walk-in freezer and small walk-in freezer, which is inside the refrigerator. He stated the door handle of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurate for four Residents (#1, #6, #30, #24) out of 9 residents sampled for PASRR review. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 showed an admission to facility on 07/20/23 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia moderate with mood disturbance, dissociative and conversion disorder, major depressive disorder, and panic disorder. Review of the PASRR, dated 6/14/2023, showed on page two panic disorder not marked on section A. Mental Illness or suspected mental illness. Page 5 marked no diagnosis or suspicion of serious mental illness or intellectual disability indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation required. The box on page showed A level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the individual has a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia or related neurocognitive disorder, and a suspicion or diagnosis of an Serious Mental Illness, Intellectual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was offered prior to meals to residents in the dining room during one (7/15/24) of one meal observations. Findings included: On 7/15/24 at 11:51 a.m. observations of the main dining room during the lunch meal revealed no hand hygiene was offered to residents prior to eating. There were sixteen resident in the dining room at the time of the observation. Residents were observed sitting down at their table of choice. Staff were observed assisting residents with positioning at the table. Staff were observed providing beverages and condiments to residents. At 12:29 p.m. staff started to provide each resident with their lunch meal. Observations of the main dining room from 11:51 a.m. to 12:40 p.m. revealed no hand hygiene was offered to the residents by the staff. On 7/18/24 at 9:48 a.m. an interview with Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was conducted. She stated she typically assists in the dining area. She stated she provides hand hygiene when giving residents a bed bath, before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure privacy of personal health information on three medication carts (Wing A and Wing C) out of four medication carts observed. Findings included: On 7/17/24 at 11:09 a.m. the facility's nursing shift report form was observed unattended on top of one of two medication carts on the Wing A hallway. The cart was assigned to Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN). (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On 7/17/24 at 11:10 a.m. the facility's nursing shift report form was observed unattended on top of one of two medications carts in the Wing C hallway. The cart was assigned to Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). On 7/18/24 at 11:19 a.m. the facility's nursing shift report form was observed unattended on top of the second medication cart in the Wing C hallway. The cart was assigned to Staff J, LPN (Photographic Evidence Obtained). The facility's nursing shift report form observed unattended on the three medication carts contained the following resident personal health information (PHI): -Room number -Date and shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged violation of abuse/neglect within the required timeframe, related to elopement for two residents (#43 and #281) out of the four residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, hypertension, unspecified dementia, and other co-morbidities. A review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #43 had a Brief Interview Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Section G: Functional Status revealed Resident #43 needed the following assistance for activities of daily living: bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene- being dependent; transfers- dependent; eating - supervision. A review of Resident #43's admission nursing evaluation showed the resident was not at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide nursing care according to standards related to properly dating skin care dressings one resident (#59) out of eight residents sampled. Findings included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses to include metabolic encephalopathy, Rhabdomyolysis (skeletal muscle breaks down rapidly), history of falls and other co-morbidities. On 7/15/2024 at 10:58 AM, Resident #59 was observed and interviewed lying in the bed. Resident #59's feet were at the foot board of the bed with undated dressings. (Photographic Evidence was Obtained). The resident stated the dressings had not been changed for a couple of days. On 7/16/2024 at 11:31 AM, Resident #59 was observed and interviewed. Resident #59's feet were at the foot board of the bed with undated dressings. The Resident stated the dressing had been changed. A review of Resident #59's active Physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty eight medication administration opportunities were observed, and three errors were identified for three residents (#23, #29 and #39) out of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 10.71% medication error rate. Findings included: On 7/17/24 at 8:04 a.m. a medication administration observation was conducted with Staff D, Registered Nurse, (RN), for Resident #21. Staff D, RN administered the following medications: -Amlodipine 5 mg (milligrams) for high blood pressure. -Abilify 5 mg for depression. - Plavix 75 mg for clot prevention. - Vitamin D 1000 units, 2 tablets for vitamin supplement. - Colace 100 mg to prevent constipation -Cymbalta 25 mg for depression - Loratadine 10 mg for allergy relief. - Senokot 2 tablets for constipation. - Multiple Vitamins with minerals 1 tablet for wound healing. - Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release 50 mg for high blood pressure -Potassium Chloride Extended Release 20 MEQ (milliequivalent) for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store medications safely and securely for one resident (#22) of thirty-two residents sampled. Findings included: An observation and interview with Resident #22 on 07/15/2024 at 11:28 AM revealed unsecured medications on Resident #22's bedside furniture including Tylenol, nasal spray and medicated powder. He said he takes Tylenol once in a while, he only takes a couple, no more than two and he lets the nurse know when he takes them. A review of Resident # 22's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with a date of 05/28/2024, revealed in section C-Cognitive Patterns: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. A review of Resident # 22's July 2024 physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 03/07/2024 and no end date for Acetaminophen 325 mg [milligram], Give two tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for mild pain NTE [not to exceed] 3 GMS [grams] 24hr [hour]. There was no order for self-administration of medications for Resident #22. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL