Quadrangle
3300 Darby Road, Haverford, PA 19041 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 63 certified beds · (610) 642-3000 Medicare only — no Medicaid
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-16)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.5% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.7% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 11.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.1% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.6% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.1% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.2% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.07 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 1.18 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 542 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 240 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.94 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.0%CMS range 59.8–68.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 8.2–12.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.5–9.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 63.0 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.13 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.55 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.19 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to check the temperature of the hot water provided to Resident R1 which resulted in actual harm to Resident R1, of spillage of hot water on the left upper and outer thigh, and developing a blister on the left thigh for one of six residents. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the facility's police title Safe holding and serving temperature for hot beverages last revised May 2, 2017, revealed the temperatures that hot beverages should be served at are governed by palatability and by the risk for a burn. Under Procedure A, it further states Serve the hot beverages between 140 and 155 degrees. Dietary should record hot beverage temperatures for every meal. Review of information dated December 24, 2024 and submitted to the State Survey Office on December 24, 2024, indicated, After having dinner on 12/23/2024 at 6:00 p.m. [Resident R1] was enjoying a cup of hot tea.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to Transmission Based Precautions for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R1and R2) and an Infection Preventionist.Findings include:Review of facility policy, Infection Prevention and Control Program revised in July 2022, revealed that it is the community's policy to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Association of Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC). Further review of policy revealed that The Skilled Nursing Administrator (SNA)/ Director of Nursing Services (DNS) designates a Registered Nurse as the Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their representatives could file a grievance/concern anonymously by failing to ensure that grievance boxes were in place for residents or their representatives to anonymously drop their grievances/complaints for two of two units reviewed. (First floor and Second floor) Findings: Review of facility admission packet provided to residents and/or resident family upon admission revealed Resident Grievance Procedure included in the admission packet. Review of the Resident Grievance Procedure revealed that under section PROCEDURE: #1. Complete a Grievance form. Forms are in the Lobby, Activities room, Bistro, and Family Room. Resident /Family members can anonymously deliver their grievance for in the out-going box outside of the Activities Room on the second floor. The form will be addressed by the Grievance Coordinator. Observation of the first-floor lobby area in front of the elevator, and observation of all the public areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of the facilities, Food Storage, Preparation and Service policy with a revision date of April 11, 2022 indicated that food storage areas included walk in and reach in refrigerators and freezers, under the counter refrigeration and freezer units, bistro and common area refrigerator and freezer units, and any dry storage area units. The policy also state that all food items are labeled, dated and rotated to maintain a system of First In First Out. Continued review of the policy indicated that all refrigeration, freezer and dry storage areas are outfitted with a properly calibrated thermometer. Observation of the 3rd floor kitchen on April 2, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. with the Director of Culinary Services (Employee 23), the Director of Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse. Findings Include: Observations on April 2, 2026 with the Culinary Director (Employee E23), the Director of Maintenance (Employee E24), and the Nursing Home Administrator on April 2, 2025 at 11:35 a.m. near the trash compactors (areas on the sides of , front of, back of, and underneath of the trash compactors) located near the loading dock receiving area revealed the following: Various trash items such as tops to jars, cans, sugar packets bottles and cardboard boxes were seen in the above referenced areas. The presence of fall leaves and 1 dinner plate was even also among the trash/debris. Various other trash items had been present for so long that they turned black, appeared moist, and the type of trash/debris it once was could not be determined due to its diminished appearance. A Styrofoam food container whose food compartments were filled with dark stagnant water, in addition to other trash/debis. A paper scattered around the trash compactors, in addition to plastic gloves,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of facility-initiated transfers and discharges, and failed to ensure that a 30-day discharge notice included required information, for four of four residents reviewed for discharge notices (Residents R57, R16, R59 and R58). Findings include: Review of facility documentation, Admission/Discharge To/From Report revealed that Resident R16 was transferred to the hospital on January 10, 2025; that Resident R59 was transferred to the hospital on January 17, 2025; and that Resident R58 was transferred to the hospital on January 9, 2025. Clinical record review for Resident R16 revealed a Transfer/Discharge note, dated January 10, 2025, at 10:56 a.m. which indicated that the facility was unable to meet the resident's needs and was transferred to the hospital. The resident was noted to be lethargic with acute change in mental status and the physician ordered for the resident to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was informed of charges for services not covered under Medicare, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R61). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident R61 revealed a social services note, dated October 14, 2024, at 3:18 p.m. which indicated that the resident was issued a NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) with a last cover date of October 17, 2024. The note indicated that either discharge or alternate payor was due after that date. Continued review of social services notes for Resident R61 revealed a note, dated October 18, 2024, at 2:52 p.m. which indicated that the resident would discharge to an assisted living facility on October 21, 2024. Review of Resident R61's census data revealed that on October 17, 2024, the resident's Medicare A coverage ended and that on October 18, 2024, the resident paid out-of-pocket (privately paid) for skilled services until October 21, 2024, when the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse and neglect for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R16 and R57). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation - Prevention, Reporting and Investigation dated revised February 14, 2022, revealed, Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Continued review revealed, Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Further review revealed, Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Interview on March 31, 2025, at 12:31 p.m. Resident R16 stated that there was an incident with a nurse a few…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete an MDS assessment for one of three closed records reviewed (Resident R55). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident R55 revealed a Discharge Note, dated January 5, 2025, at 2:10 p.m. which indicated that the resident discharged home with family. Review of Resident R55's Discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated January 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was discharged on January 5, 2025, to a short-term general hospital. Interview on April 3, 2025, at 11:58 a.m. Employee E11, nurse assessment coordinator, confirmed that Resident R55 discharged home and that the discharge MDS assessment was not completed accurately. 28 Pa Code 211.5(i) Medical records
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan and interventions related to pain management, foot care and compression stocking for two of 17 resident clinical record reviewed (Resident R42 and Resident R47). Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy titled, Individualized Care Plan, revealed, the IDT develops comprehensive care plan addressing the residents most acute problems. The comprehensive care plan will include services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental and psychological well-being. Review of Resident R43 revealed that Resident R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Central Cord Syndrome at C4 level, Spinal stenosis Lumbar Region, displaced fracture of acromial process, left shoulder. Observation of Resident R43 conducted on April 1, 2025, at 9:04 a.m., revealed that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order related to the application of compression stockings, and failed to clarify/notify the physician of the expected time of the completion of an ultrasound study for 2 out of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R47 and Resident R35). Findings include: Review of the resident's Inpatient Discharge Summary dated 2/6/2025 indicated that the Resident R47 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] after having a fall at home. The resident was transferred to the facility on February 6, 2025 for rehabilitation services. Review of the April 2025 physician orders for Resident R47 included the following diagnoses diabetes (a condition characterized by elevated levels of blood glucose ,and a condition that makes an individual with the diagnosis at greater risks for developing foot problems); hypertension (high blood pressure); hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol.) and sleep apnea (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that podiatrist services were provided for 1 out of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R47). Findings include: Review of the resident's Inpatient Discharge Summary dated 2/6/2025, indicated that the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] after having a fall at home. The resident was transferred to the facility on February 6, 2025 for rehabilitation services. Review of the April 2025 physician orders for Resident R47 included the following diagnoses of diabetes (a condition characterized by elevated levels of blood glucose ,and a condition that makes an individual with the diagnosis at greater risks for developing foot problems ); hypertension (high blood pressure); hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). During an interview with Resident R47 on April 2, 2024 at 11:30 a.m., Resident R47 reported that she had been at the facility since February 2025, had diabetes, had requested on a number of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain orders for urinary catheter for one of two clinical records of residents with urinary catheters reviewed (Resident R46). Findings include: Review of Resident R46's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to Chronic Urinary Tract Infection, Chronic Tubulo-interstitial Nephritis, Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy with Lower Unitary Tract Symptoms, Bladder Neck Obstructions and Uro-genital Implant Further review of Resident R46's clinical record revealed that Resident R46 was discharged to the hospital on March 25, 2025, and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R46's clinical record (service evaluation and health assessment) dated March 29, 2025, revealed that resident R46 was admitted s/p (status post) pyelonephritis recurrent UTI (urinary track infection), has foley- (indewelling urinary catheter) intact and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that intravenous (IV) devices were maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one residents reviewed for intravenous therapy (Resident R106). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Vascular Access Devices and Infusion Therapy Procedure, Peripherally Inserted Central Line Catheter (PICC)[ a thin soft tube inserted in a vein in the arm with the tip of the tube positioned in a large vein that carries blood to the heart] dated October 2024, revealed, Measure circumference of upper arm before insertion or on admission as a baseline and when clinically indicated to assess for the presence of edema [excess fluid] and possible deep vein thrombosis [blood clot]. Measure 10 c.m. [centimeters] above the insertion site. Measure external length of PICC catheter at insertion or on admission, with each dressing change,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain orders for oxygen for one of 17 clinical records reviewed (Resident R21). Findings include: Review of Resident R21's clinical record revealed that Resident R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory failure with Hypoxia (low levels of oxygen). Further review of Resident R21's clinical record revealed a care plan for oxygen therapy related to chronic heart failure date initiated: 03/11/2025. Further review of Resident R21's clinical record revealed that there was no physician's orders for oxygen. Review of Resident R21's Daily Skilled Evaluation dated March 26, 2025 revealed that under section Skilled Services, 7a, #1:Oxygen was coded yes and 7c. Respiratory management: document evaluation and response to above selected services (may include respiratory pattern changes, lung sounds, O2 sat monitoring, endurance levels, shortness of breath upon exertion, shortness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care of residents with intravenous (IV) devices for two of five employees reviewed for IV skills competencies (Employees E15 and E16). Findings include: Observation on March 31, 2025, at 12:42 p.m. revealed that Resident R106 had a PICC (intravenous) line in his right upper arm. Resident R106 stated that he received antibiotic medication through the PICC line twice per day. Review of Resident R106's care plan revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], to receive intravenous antibiotic therapy due to sepsis (infection in the blood). Review of Resident R106's physician orders revealed an order, dated March 25, 2025, to administer cefazolin (antibiotic mediation) intravenously every 12 hours for bloodstream infection. Continued review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for two of three medication carts reviewed (Second floor nursing unit A and C medication carts). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Narcotic Reconciliation dated revised July 11, 2022, revealed, Controlled medications are counted at the beginning and end of each shift by two authorized team members at the same time. The incoming authorized team member counts the controlled medication. The outgoing authorized team member visually verifies the actual number of controlled medications regardless of form against the amounts listed on the declining inventory sheets. The number of unit-dose/blister pack medication cards is also verified during the drug count process. This process is done together for each controlled medication to be reconciled. Observation on April 1, 2025, at 9:08 a.m. of the second floor nursing unit A medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, staff interview and review of clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to contact precaution and maintenance of urinary catheter/urine bag for two of 17 residents observed. (Resident R46 and Resident R159) Findings include: Review of facility policy on Transmission Based Precaution revealed that transmission-based precautions are used for residents with documented or suspected infection or colonization with highly transmissible pathogens. Communicate the type of precautions required though verbal reports, hand-off reports, entering on the alert page in [Eletronic System] and posting signs outside the resident's rooms. Contact Precautions for resident with known or suspected infections that are of an increased risk of being transmitted by direct contact with the resident or the resident's environment. Use the following guidelines to manage the care of residents on contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select manufacture's guidelines, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident R3). Findings include: The facility's policy title Medication Administration General Guidelines revised 2027 states Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufactures' specification, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. The facility's New admission Checklist policy unknown creation date, reveals Prior to admission, enter allergies into system, put in ancillary orders see separate sheet/documents; save in queue, pt (patient) in medication order save in queue, add diet order in queue, add code status, verify orders with assigned doctor/NP (nurse practitioner). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Food Storage, Preparation and Service revised April 11, 2022, revealed that cutting boards are color coded and used according to food type. The red cutting board is to be utilized for raw meat and processed (not raw) items are to be handled on a white cutting board. Further review revealed that all food items are labeled, dated and rotated to maintain a system of First In First Out (FIFO). An initial tour of the Food Service Department was conducted on May 20, 2024, at 10:14 a.m. with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E5, and the Dietary Manager (DM), Employee E6. Observations revealed the following: Employee E11, the Cook, was observed cutting vegetables on the white cutting board. Further observation revealed Employee E11 proceeded to handle raw ground…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that garbage was dispose of properly. Findings include: Observation in the receiving area revealed five dumpsters with the lid open revealing contents; dirty plastics were observed around the dumpsters. The ground all around the loading dock was littered with hundreds of cigarette butts. Interview with Food Service Director at 9:45 a.m. on May 14, 2024, 10:40 a.m. confirmed the above findings.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of one alleged violation of unknown source of injury for one of 16 residents reviewed. (Resident R165). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation - Prevention, Reporting and Investigation dated, May 4, 2016, revealed, The SNA/designee manages and directs the investigation of all abuse, neglect and/or exploitation. Review of facility investigation dated August 21, 2023, revealed that while providing care, a nurse aide transferred Resident R165, and her head hit the guard rail. This resulted in a hematoma on the right side of her forehead. Resident was sent to the hospital for further assessment. Further review of the investigation revealed a statement by Employee E13, nurse aide revealed that she provided care to resident including transfer with the help of other staff. She also provided care to resident in bed. Employee E13 indicated that there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer to the hospital in a timely manner, in writing and in a language and manner they understoodfor one of 16 residents reviewed. (Resident R52) Findings Include: Review of nursing note for Resident R52, dated May 8, 2024, revealed that the resident was febrile (having or showing symptoms of a fever), and was discharged to the hospital. Further review revealed a nursing note for Resident R52, dated April 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was discharged to the hospital for systemic anemia. Another nursing note for Resident R52, dated March 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with acute kidney injury. Review of clinical record revealed no evidence that Resident R52's representative was notified of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer in writing, and in a language and manner they understood. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident representative receive written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of a facility-initiated transfer to a hospital for one of 16 residents reviewed. (Resident R52) Findings include: Review of nursing note for Resident R52, dated May 8, 2024, revealed that the resident was febrile (having or showing symptoms of a fever), and was discharged to the hospital. Further review revealed a nursing note for Resident R52, dated April 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was discharged to the hospital for systemic anemia. Another nursing note for Resident R52, dated March 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with acute kidney injury. Further review of Resident R52's clinical record revealed that there was no documented evidence that the resident and his representative were provided with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of Resident R52's facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and modify interventions consistent with the resident's needs to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of three residents reviewed for nutritional status (Resident R44 and R55). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Nutritional Intervention Pathways for Weight Loss undated, revealed that oral supplements must be obtained from the physician and documented. Review of facility policy titled, Fortified Foods revised June 7, 2016, revealed that fortified foods will meet the increased nutritional needs of residents who are underweight, have significant weight loss, pressure ulcers or poor intake. Once the physician approves the fortified food, a diet order written as Fortified food will appear in the resident's medical records. Recipes, amount to be served and frequency must be kept on file. Further review revealed that acceptance of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records, facility documentation, observations, interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care of residents with intravenous line and medication administration for two of two employee records reviewed. (Employee E14 and E15). Findings Include: Review of facility reported incident dated December 14, 2024, revealed that Resident R164 was involved in a medication error. Nurse accidentally administered Sertraline (Antidepressant) 100 milligrams (mg) tablet and Lisinopril (Blood Pressure medication) 10 mg. Resident's family requested evaluation from nurse practitioner in-house. They were not available and therefore resident was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. Review of clinical record revealed that the medication was administered by Licensed nurse, Employee E15. A request for medication administration competency prior to the medication error was requested to the Director of Nursing n May 21, 2024. Facility did not provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of significant medication error for two of five residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident R164 and Resident R167). Findings include: Review of facility reported incident dated December 14, 2024, revealed that Resident R164 was involved in a medication error. Nurse accidentally administered sertraline (Antidepressant) 100 mg tablet and lisinopril (Blood Pressure medication) 10 milligrams (mg). Resident's family requested evaluation from nurse practitioner in-house. They were not available and therefore resident was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. Review of physician orders for Resident R164 on December 14, 2023, revealed that there was no physician orders for sertraline and lisinopril. Interview with Director of Nursing on May 21, 2024, stated nurse did not follow appropriate practice of medication administration. The nurse who administered medication to Resident R64 was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director or designee was in attendance at monthly Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings for three of three months reviewed. (January 2024 through April 2024) Findings include: A review of QAPI Committee meeting sign-in sheets for the period of January 2024 through April 2024, revealed no documented evidence that the Medical Director or other physician was in attendance, virtually or in-person, at the QA meetings held from January 2024 through April 2024. Interview with the administrator on May 22, 2024, at 12:00 PM confirmed that the facility documentation did not show evidence that the medical director was in attendance, virtually or in-person, at the QA meetings held from January 2024 through April 2024. 28 Pa. Code 211.2(d)(5)(6)(7)(8)(10) Medical director 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(2)(3)(4) Management.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a complete and through investigation was completed to rule out neglect for a bruise of unknown origin for 1 out of 14 residents reviewed (Resident R35). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation, undated, revealed Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The SNA/designee manages and directs the investigation of all abuse, neglect and/or exploitation. Interview with facility Administrator on August 7, 2023, at approximately 10:17 a.m. failed to provide a policy or investigation procedure regarding injury of unknown origin. Review of Resident R35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-a periodic assessment of a resident's needs) indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (the loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans for hearing difficulty and scratching behaviors for two of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R8 and R35). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Individualized Care Plan, revised October 20, 2022, revealed, the IDT develops comprehensive care plan addressing the residents most acute problems. The comprehensive care plan will include services that are to be furnished to attan or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental and psychological well-being. During resident screening conducted on August 2, 2023, on the second floor, at approximately 12:28 p.m. revealed Resident R8 sitting in her room at bedside. Surveyor greeted Resident R8 at the door but Resident R8 did not look up. After several greeting attempts, each attempt louder than the previous, resident still had not acknowledged surveyor due to hard of hearing. A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-07 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a complete discharge summary was completed for two of three closed records reviewed (Resident R154 and R48). Findings Include: Review of Resident R154's clinical record revealed the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], and did not return to the facility after hospitalization. Review of Resident R48's clinical record revealed the resident expired at the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the clinical records revealed no documented evidence that the physician completed a discharge summary with a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility. Interview on [DATE], at 1:50 p.m. with Employee E1, Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed discharge summaries were not available for Resident R154 and R48. 28 Pa. Code 211.5 (d) Medical Records 28 Pa. Code 211.5 (f) (xii) Medical Records
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician orders for one of 14 records reviewed for monitoring of a medication. (Resident R39). Finding include: Review of Resident R39's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated April 4, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure) and congestive heart failure (heart is not able to pump blood efficiently so blood and fluids collect in your lungs and legs over time) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat because blood not flowing proper in heart causing an increase in blood clot and increase of stroke). Review of Resident R39's physician orders instructed to obtain daily weights dated April 1, 2023 and Digoxin Oral Tablet 250 mcg, give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time a day related to atrial fibrillation. On April 3, 2023 the order changed to Digoxin oral tablet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor hydration and nutritional supplement consumption for two of three residents reviewed for nutritional status. (Resident R22, and Resident R39) Findings include: Review of facility policy Nutrition and Weight Management Program in the section titled, Oral supplements, revealed Oral nutritional supplements such as Ensure and Boost are used as an intervention for nutritional supplementation. Staff is to monitor the resident's intake of supplements. Review of Resident R22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated June 8, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Dementia (a disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A review of Resident R22's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) revealed a score of ten,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of resident records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure one resident receiving respiratory care was provided care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents reviewed receiving respiratory services (Resident R25). Findings include: Facility policy titled Oxygen Administration not dated stated, Oxygen is administered to residents who need it consistent with professional standards of practice. Review of Resident R25's clinicakl record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure and used supplemental oxygen to assist in breathing. Physician orders dated May 2, 2023, instructed to Wean oxygen to keep SATS (oxygen saturation) above 90%. On August 2, 2023, at 11:29 a.m. with Licensed Nurse, Employee E5, Resident R25 was observed on 3 liters (L) of oxygen at bedside. Employee E5 stated she didn't know why it was on 3 L of oxygen, It's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an as needed psychotropic medication had documented rationale for continued use past 14 with a duration for the PRN order, failed to appropriately monitor the effects of the medication, and failed to administer the medication in accordance with prescriber recommendations for one of five residents reviewed for medication regimen reviews (Resident R28). Findings Include: Review of Resident R28's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated June 29, 2023, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear) and received antianxiety medications during the last seven days. Review of Resident R28's comprehensive care plan dated December 28, 2022, revealed the resident used anti-anxiety medications related to anxiety disorder. Interventions included to monitor/document/report any adverse reactions to anti-anxiety therapy. Review of Resident R28's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete an annual review of the facility assessment for any potential resources needed. Findings Include: On August 2, 2023, at approximately 9:45 a.m. during an entrance conference meeting with Employee E1, Nursing Home Administrator, and Employee E2, Director of Nursing, surveyor requested a copy of the facility assessment within four hours per the entrance conference guidelines. A copy of the facility assessment was requested by surveyor again on August 2, 2023, at approximately 2:00 p.m. and on August 3, 2023, at 10:10 a.m. Review of facility assessment provided by the facility on August 3, 2023, at approximately 2:00 p.m. revealed the facility completed an annual review of the facility assessment on August 3, 2023. Review of facility documentation revealed the last annual review of the facility assessment was completed June 7, 2022. Subsequently, the facility assessment was not reviewed for any potential resources neccesary in the last 14 months. Interview on August 7,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-01-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCP S-H SUNRISE OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2020 |
| HCP S-H 2014 MEMBER LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/02/2024 |
| HCP S-H OPCO TRS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/16/2020 |
| HEALTHPEAK OP LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/16/2020 |
| HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/16/2020 |
| S-H 2014 OPCO TRS INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/02/2024 |
| SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/20/2025 |
| BOWN, KEITH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| COELHO, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| DESAI, MEHIR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| ECCLES, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/28/2024 |
| FALCO, DENISE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| FRANTZ, EDWARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| KESSLER, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| O'RIORDAN, DAMIEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| PAINTER, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| ROYAL, PATRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/02/2024 |
| SEKEL, WENDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| THOMPSON, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| VERGER, PIERRE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| WELLS, ANJA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
| CHENG, PATRICK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/28/2025 |
| JOHNSTON, SHAWN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/28/2025 |
| RUSSO, FRANK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/28/2025 |
| HARRIS, TONY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/16/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395801. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.