Belvoir Woods Health Care Center At The Fairfax

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 349 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 210 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.80 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 48.3 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0574 — pattern
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to inform the residents of the location for the contact information for the State Survey Agency and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program.The findings include:During an observation of the third floor on 3/11/2026 at approximately 9:30 am, the list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of the State licensure office, and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program information was observed to be posted behind the concierge's desk on the wall, inaccessible to the residents. No other signage with the required information was hung on the third floor.During the Resident Council Meeting on 3/11/2026 at approximately 11:07 am, 10 out of 10 residents were unable to identify where the list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of the State licensure office, and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program information was located. They were unaware that they had the right to file a complaint with the State…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0575 — pattern
  Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to post the required State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program information in a place that is accessible to all residents.The findings include:During an observation of the third floor on 3/11/2026 at approximately 9:30 am, the list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of the State licensure office, and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program information was observed to be posted behind the concierge's desk on the wall, inaccessible to the residents. No other signage with the required information was hung on the third floor.During the Resident Council Meeting on 3/11/2026 at approximately 11:07 am, 10 out of 10 residents were unable to identify where the list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of the State licensure office, and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program information was located. They were unaware that they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed review and revise the person-centered care plan for 4 for 38 residents (Resident #7, #10, #11 and #43), in the survey sample.1. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #7's care plan to include an election of hospice services with an admission to hospice services on 3/8/26.Resident #7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], after an acute care hospital stay. The residents' current diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/22/2025, coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 3 out of 15. This indicated that Resident #7's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were severely impaired. A review of the active care plan, with a target date of 3/26/26, failed to identify a care plan addressing the residents' admission to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and a review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary activities of daily living (ADLs) for 4 dependent residents (Resident #16, Resident #67, Resident #49 and Resident #45) of the 38 residents in the survey sample. 1.The facility staff failed to provide at least 2 showers a week and to wash the residents' hair since admission. Resident #16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The residents' current diagnoses included repeated falls and unsteadiness on feet. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/04/26 was coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 12 out of 15. This indicated that Resident #16's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were intact. The resident's personal care plan dated 2/26/26 with a focus on bathing had a Goal specifying resident will gain increased functional ability…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, the facility staff failed to identify failed systems. The findings included:On 3/18/26 at approximately 11:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM) regarding any specific care areas or services the committee had identified as not functioning well, or that had failed. Information comes from data collected from the 5-star report, Resident Council meetings, grievances, families, residents, and the Interdisciplinary Team members. The ADM further stated that falls, pressure ulcers, and a newly developed process related to transcription errors were current systems they had identified and were ongoing. The three areas identified during the survey were not identified by the facility's staff and were not presented to the QAPI team. Throughout the survey conducted 3/10/26 through 3/13/26 and 3/16/26 through 3/18/26, three system failures were identified. They were Activities of Daily Living, specifically showers/tub baths, reviews and revisions of person-centered care plans, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure that two (2) residents (Resident #18 and Resident #5) in the survey sample of 38 residents lived in a comfortable, homelike environment.The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure the Resident #18 remained comfortable and warm in her room, room [ROOM NUMBER] B. Resident #18 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay and readmitted on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included: Chronic Kidney DS, stage 3B, and Neuralgia and Neuritis, Unspecified. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/14/26, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #18's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. The resident's personal care plan dated 5/08/25 read that the resident would make their own decisions and have no memory loss. A Goal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to accurately transcribe a medication order for 1 of 38 residents (Resident 32) in the survey sample.The findings included: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The residents' current diagnoses included Right 5th finger osteomyelitis/septic arthritis requiring IV therapy, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/5/26, coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 11 out of 15. This indicated that Resident # 32's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were moderately impaired. Resident #32 was discharged from the hospital and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an order for Apixaban Oral Tablet 2.5 MG. Give one tablet by mouth twice daily. A new order was written on 3/13/26 at 3:56 PM for Apixaban Oral Tablet 2.5 MG. Give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care to prevent the development of a sacral stage 3 pressure ulcer in 1 of 38 residents in the survey sample (Resident #7), constituting harm. The findings included: Resident #7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], after an acute care hospital stay. The residents' current diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/22/2025, coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 3 out of 15. This indicated that Resident #7's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were severely impaired. In section GG0130. Self-Care: the resident was coded as requiring set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene; supervision or touch assistance with personal hygiene; substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, showers/bathes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview with Family Member #1, staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to provide adequate assistance during incontinence care to prevent a fall for 1 of 38 residents in the survey sample (Resident #10). The findings included: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The residents' diagnoses included diabetes, high blood pressure with episodes of orthostatic hypotension, and impaired mobility and self-care secondary to Fusion of the lumbar spine. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/6/26, coded that the resident completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored 5 out of 15. This indicated that Resident #10's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were severely impaired. An interview was conducted with the Rehabilitation Director on 3/11/26 at 10:00 AM. The Rehab Director stated the resident was unable to tolerate therapy, was resistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the resident with a bedside urinal upon request from the resident for 1 resident (Resident #67) out of 38 residents in the survey sample.The findings Include:Resident #67 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] due to a right intertrochanteric femur fracture. The residents' current diagnoses included repeated falls and unsteadiness on their feet.The admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/8/2026, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of the possible 15. This indicated that Resident #67's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact.The resident's personal care plan dated 3/2/2026 read that the resident requires partial/moderate assistance with toilet use and the use of incontinent briefs, and is able to make self-care decisions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA