No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Plaza West

912 American Eagle Blvd, Sun City Center, FL 33573 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 113 certified beds · (813) 633-3066 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (813) 633-3066 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 19 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1901 Haverford Ave · (813) 634-9284 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
765 Cortaro Dr · (813) 551-2999 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
791 Cortaro Dr · (813) 331-3841 · Call to confirm hours
Park
901 6th St SE · (813) 672-7881 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1239 Del Webb Blvd W · (813) 634-1252

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.7%8.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.1%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.0%9.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.1%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.2%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.8%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.6%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.372.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.381.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 479 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.78U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.34hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.38hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 245 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.78 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.0%CMS range 62.8–71.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.9%CMS range 10.9–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 4.2–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.89
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
21.4%
Total nursing turnover
5.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 94.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.01 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.18 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-31)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice, notify the receiving facility, and document a discharge summary for two residents (#98 and #8) out of two residents sampled.Findings included:1. Review of Resident #98's admission record revealed an admission date of 05/22/2025 and was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Resident #98 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, and acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure.Review of Resident #98's Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice dated 05/29/2025 revealed Resident #98 was discharged to a hospital because Residents medical needs were unable to be met. The Physician/Designee Name and Signature were blank. The Resident or Representative Name and Signature were blank. The notice given to: resident, legal guardian or representative date was blank.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care and services related to wound care for three residents (#56, #58, #11) out of three sampled residents. Findings Included: 1. During an observation on 07/28/2025 at 12:23 p.m., Resident #56 was observed sitting in a wheelchair with undated white bandages around both of her lower legs. Review of Resident #56's admission record revealed an initial admission date of 04/17/2025. Resident #56 was admitted with diagnosis to include partial intestinal obstruction, unspecified as to cause, acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity, and peripheral vascular disease, unspecified. Review of Resident #56's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed Section M. Skin Conditions, revealed venous and arterial ulcers, skin tears, and application of nonsurgical dressings (with or without topical medications) other than to feet. Review of Resident #56’s physician orders revealed: Dated 07/07/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to accurately assess and implement appropriate interventions for two residents (#2 and #8) of six residents sampled for accidents. Findings included: On 07/28/25 at 9:53 a.m. Resident #2 was observed sitting in a wheelchair alone at table in the common area between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The resident’s wheelchair was pushed up to table with both wheelchair brakes in a locked position. The resident was observed pushing at the table. During the observation, Staff N, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) reported the resident’s diagnosis and was Spanish-speaking only. On 07/28/25 at 11:04 a.m. Staff L, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed unlocking both of Resident #2’s wheelchair brakes. The staff member reported going to take the resident to assist with toileting and confirmed unlocking the brakes on each side of the wheelchair. Staff L stated the resident moves arms and legs when sitting at tables. On 07/29/25 at 11:12 a.m. Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility did not ensure food service standards were followed related to hand hygiene and sanitary practices in the main kitchen and in one of three satellite kitchens. Findings included: On 07/28/25 at 9:10 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Associate Dining Director. An observation of Staff F, Utility Technician revealed he was using the high temperature dish machine. He was the only staff member using the dish machine during the observation. Staff F was taking the test strip out of a clear tube to check the temperature of the dish machine. He was observed to drop the test strip on the floor and used the same one to verify the final rinse temperature. During the observation he did not have gloves on. After dropping the test strip on the floor, he put the test strip in the water and determined the temperature was appropriate. Staff F, Utility Technician, did not perform hand hygiene after picking up the test strip from the floor and moving on to another task.On 07/28/25 at 9:15 a.m., an observation of Staff H, Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program related to the storage of urinary catheters for one resident (#104) of one resident sampled, failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene during the administration of medications for one resident (#33) of six residents observed during medication administration observation, failed to ensure one Staff (C) out of 25 staff fingernails were kept in a manner that allowed for hand hygiene to be completed in a sanitary manner, and failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for three residents (#56, #58 and #11) of seven residents sampled for infection control practices. 1. Review of Resident #56's admission Record revealed an initial admission date of 04/17/2025. Resident #56 was admitted with diagnoses to include partial intestinal obstruction, unspecified as to cause, acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity, hypertensive chronic kidney disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for one resident (#6) of three sampled residents related to positioning during enteral nutrition administration.Findings included:Review of Resident #6's care plan revised on 07/25/2025 revealed Resident #6 required tube feeding related to dysphagia. The goal was for the resident to remain free of side effects or complications related to tube feeding through the review date. Interventions included: Resident #6 needs head of bed (HOB) elevated 45 degrees during and thirty minutes after tube feed. On 7/28/25 at 2:00 p.m. Resident #6 was observed in his room lying on his bed with the head of the bed (HOB) elevated approximately 30 degrees as his enteral nutrition pump was administering his tube feeding. On 7/29/25 at 9:10 a.m. Resident #6 was observed in his bed with his eyes closed and his HOB elevated less than 45 degrees as his enteral nutrition pump was administering his tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to assist with the placement of hearing aids for one resident (#17) out of one resident sampled. Findings Included: During an interview on 07/28/2025 at 10:21 a.m. Resident #17 stated You will have to come closer and speak louder, I don't have my hearing aids in, so I can't hear you. I don't know where my hearing aids are you will have to check with my son. Resident #17 was observed to not have hearing aids in during the interview.During a phone interview on 07/29/2025 at 1:08 p.m., Resident #17's Family Member (FM) stated he has spoken with the facility a few times about helping his mom with her hearing aids. He stated they always forget to charge them so she can't use them. We have family who want to call and talk with her, but if she does not have her hearing aids in, she cannot use the phone. I have to remind them to put them on the charger for her. They called me last week because her hearing aids broke. I came and picked them up last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess and notify the physician related to resident's pain and ineffectiveness of the prescribed pain medication for one resident (#38) of two sampled residents.Findings included:On 07/28/25 at 3:30 p.m. Resident #38 was observed sitting in the wheelchair in the resident's room. Resident #38 stated staff would not give acetaminophen because they had already given the resident something (for pain). Resident #38 reported a jabbing pain. The observation revealed a wound dressing to the left lower extremity.Review of Resident #38s admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified peripheral vascular disease. The resident's diagnoses included but not limited to cellulitis of left lower limb, unspecified systemic lupus erythematosus, unspecified site unspecified osteoarthritis, and cervical region spinal stenosis. Review of Resident #38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure timely administration of medications, as prescribed by the medical provider, and did not ensure medications were administered by a medical professional for one Resident (#106) out of one resident reviewed. The facility also failed to administer scheduled psychotropic medication per physician orders for one resident (#110) out of five medication administration observations. Findings included: 1. On 07/28/25 at 2:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #106 and their family member. Resident #106 stated to speak with their family member due to them being able to, Speak faster and hear better. Resident #106 and the family member expressed the resident was not being administered blood pressure (BP) medications on a timely basis. Resident #106's family member explained Resident #106 had many issues with BP being high and had a systolic reading of 200 multiple times. The family member said Resident #106 is supposed to be provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an anti-anxiety medication had an appropriate indication for it's use for one resident (#10) out of five residents sampled.Findings included: During an observation on 07/29/2025 at 9:35 a.m., Resident #10 was observed in bed, eyes closed, dressed for the day. Review of Resident #10's admission Record revealed an admission date of 06/16/2025. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, vascular dementia, moderate, with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance.Review of Resident #10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section N. Medications, Antipsychotic, Antianxiety, and Antidepressant.Review of Resident #10's physician orders revealed: A start date of 07/03/2025 for lorazepam oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (MG). Give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours related to Alzheimer's disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-one medication administration opportunities were observed and five errors were identified for three (Residents #73, #50, and #86) of four residents observed. These errors constituted a 16.13% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 5/8/23 at 11:13 a.m., an observation was conducted with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) of blood glucose monitoring and the administration of insulin for Resident #73. Staff D obtained a blood glucose level of 233. The staff member returned to the medication cart and removed the resident's pen of Insulin Lispro. The pen was dialed to eight (8) units, the staff member returned to the resident's room, and injected 8 units into the back of the residents' left arm. Following the administration of Resident #73's Insulin Lispro, Staff D confirmed she did not prime insulin pens. She said she was told by one person something like 2 units then at another time was told she did not have to prime insulin pens. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications stored at the bedside were assessed for safe administration for one (Resident #336) of twenty-five sampled residents. Findings Included: On 05/08/2023 at 09:41 a.m., Resident #336 was observed lying in his bed and was receptive to an interview. When he spoke, his speech was soft toned and garbled at times. His son was present and assisted with the interview. Resident #336 appeared comfortable and denied any discomfort when asked. On his over the bedside table an inhaler was present. Resident #336 stated, it's for my Parkinson's and confirmed he took it on his own as needed. On 05/09/2023 at 2:45 p.m., Resident #336 was lying in his bed with his eyes closed and appeared comfortable. His son was present at the time and confirmed his inhaler remained in his bedroom. Resident #336 remained with his eyes closed and stated softly I used it last night. Medical record review of Resident #336's admission Record form was reviewed and indicated he was geriatric in age and had resided at the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that appropriated care and services related to the use of oxygen was provided to 1 of 25 (#187) sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #187 was observed on 5/8/23 at 10:55 a.m., in bed with oxygen being delivered at 4 liters per minute (lpm). The admission Record for Resident #187 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to cellulitis of right lower limb, acute bilateral embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity, and hypokalemia. A review of a Change in Condition evaluation, dated 5/6/23, revealed Resident #187 was short of breath, with an oxygen saturation of 84% on room air was gasping for breath, and was placed on 2 lpm of Oxygen (O2). The Change in Condition indicated the provider instructed staff to continue to monitor. A progress note, dated 5/7/23 at 11:58 a.m., indicated Resident #187 was alert and oriented x4, appeared to be less anxious,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure recommendations reported by the consultant pharmacist regarding irregularities in the resident's drug regimen were acted upon for one (Resident #12) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A review of Resident #12's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 3/24/23 with a score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The record indicated the resident had diagnoses that included Essential Hypertension. A review of the resident's physician orders revealed he had a current order dated 1/5/23, to check blood pressure every 8 hours. refer to Clonidine HCI Tablet 0.1 MG order, if sbp [systolic blood pressure] is greater than 160 administer medication every shift for elevated b/p [blood pressure]. A review of the March 2023 Medication Administration Record revealed the resident had systolic blood pressure (SBP) readings greater then 160…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner related to failing to ensure that the range hood was free from dust and grease. Findings include: Observations during the initial tour of the facility's kitchen on 7/20/21 at 10:55 a.m., revealed that the kitchen housed a range hood which was located over the kitchen stove, fryer and steam oven. Closer observation of the range hood revealed dust particles on the light covers. Closer observation of the range hood revealed that grease build-up was noted on the inner sides and inner edges of the range hood. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) During the initial tour, Staff H, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) revealed that the vendor for the range hood came in and serviced/cleaned it quarterly. The company was last in the facility in April and was due to come back this month. He reported that in between the vendor's visits, the kitchen staff wipe down the range hood after every shift. Observations on 7/22/21 at 10:30 a.m. during the comprehensive tour of the kitchen,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident care plan for one (Resident #138) of twenty eight sampled residents was revised to reflect the appropriate use of a Cervical Collar. Findings include: 1. Observations of Resident #138 on 07/20/21 at 11:09 a.m., revealed that the resident was noted to have a neck brace lying on his bed. An interview with the resident at that time revealed that the neck brace was for his neck and that he should have it on. Observations of Resident #138 on 07/22/21 at 1:15 p.m., revealed the resident sitting in his wheelchair with his neck brace on. An interview with the resident at this time revealed that he wore the neck brace whenever he was sitting up. He reported that he did not have it on the other day when he was interviewed because he was eating lunch. He reported that staff took it off when he was eating because it got in the way. An interview on 07/22/21 at 1:20 p.m. with Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN), revealed that the resident had Spinal Stenosis, recently had a laminectomy, and needed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed as written according to professional quality of care standards for nursing for one (Resident #138) of twenty eight sampled residents. Findings include: 1. According to the 2019 Florida Nurse Practice Act, Chapter 464.003 defines the practice of professional nursing as: (18) Practice of professional nursing means the performance of those acts requiring substantial specialized knowledge, judgment, and nursing skill based upon applied principles of psychological, biological, physical, and social sciences which shall include, but not be limited to: (a) The observation, assessment, nursing diagnosis, planning, intervention, and evaluation of care; health teaching and counseling of the ill, injured, or infirm; and the promotion of wellness, maintenance of health, and prevention of illness of others. (b)The administration of medications and treatments as prescribed or authorized by a duly licensed practitioner authorized by the laws of this state to prescribe such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty medication administration opportunities were observed, and two errors were identified for two (Residents #21 and #10) of nine residents observed. These errors constituted a 6.67% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 7/20/21 at 3:59 p.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff Member D, Registered Nurse (RN), was conducted with Resident #21. Staff D was observed administering the following medications: - Tizanidine 2 milligram (mg) tablet The staff member dispensed the tablet, crushed it, placed it in a medication cup, and entered the residents room. She placed the medication cup, a box of vinyl gloves, and a bottle of hand sanitizer on the over-bed table. She dissolved the medication in 7.5 cubic centimeter (cc) of water, shut the feeding pump off, disconnected the nutrition from the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and inserted a 60 cc syringe into the ostomy. The staff member poured 30 cc's of water into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that a supplement with a shortened shelf life was dated when opened in one (Med Cart 1) out of three Medication Carts sampled, expired medications were disposed of, and inhalation medications were stored appropriately in one (1 South Med Room) of one Medication Preparation room. Findings included: An observation was conducted at 9:12 a.m. on 7/21/21 with Staff Member D, Registered Nurse (RN) of medication cart #1 on the 300-hallway. A half-empty bottle of cherry-flavored [brand name] sugar free liquid protein was located inside the cart. The bottle was undated as to when it was opened. The RN turned the bottle upside down to locate the manufacturer expiration date of August 2021 and stated she did not have anyone taking [the liquid protein] at that time. According to the manufacturer of [brand name] complete liquid protein(https://www.nutricialearningcenter.com/globalassets/pdfs/specialized-adult-nutrition/prostat_pp-card_sep2018.pdf) users were to Record date on bottom of container upon opening.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CCRC OPCO VENTURES LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/29/2014
BLACKROCK INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
CCRC PROPCO VENTURES, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
HCP MA3 GP HOLDING, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/19/2026
HCP MA3, LPOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
HCP PARTNERS LPOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
HCP S-H 2014 MEMBER LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
HCP VENTURES II PARTNER LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
HCP VENTURES II TRS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/19/2026
HCP/LS 2011 REIT, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
HEALTHPEAK OP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2023
HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
JANUS LIVING OP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
JANUS LIVING TRS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/19/2026
JANUS LIVING, INC.OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
JANUS MEMBER, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
OCEAN ACQUISITION I LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
STATE STREET CORPORATIONOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
VANGUARD GROUP INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
CCRC PROPCO - FREEDOM PLAZA, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
CHENG, PATRICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/31/2022
RUSSO, FRANKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/31/2022
LIFE CARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2020
GRELLA, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
RIAZUDEEN, SHAHULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ROHER, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2020
RICHTER AND ASSOCIATESOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
VOELKER, JENNIFERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 16%Medicare 11%Other / private 72%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$675per resident / day
operating cost
$20,512per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$250per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105866. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next