No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Harbour Health Center

23013 Westchester Blvd, Port Charlotte, FL 33980 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 104 certified beds · (941) 625-1220 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (941) 625-1220 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 20251 actual-harm citation$35,597 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $35,597 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-08)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4235 Kings Hwy · (941) 613-1777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4478 Tamiami Trl · (941) 235-1120 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4034 Tamiami Trl · (941) 629-4662 · Call to confirm hours
Park
23157 Bayshore Rd · (941) 627-1628 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
23190 Utica Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.0%8.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.8%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.7%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.9%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.9%9.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.2%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.5%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.7%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.2%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.402.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.951.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 443 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.62U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 253 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.5%CMS range 60.9–68.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.0%CMS range 10.3–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting85.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.8–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.20
RN hours/ resident / day
1.12
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.49
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.59
RN hoursweekends
28.2%
Total nursing turnover
40.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 78.6 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.20 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.10 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.45 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy and procedures, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 (Resident #899) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings included:A review of the facility policy Identifying Types of Abuse documented, Abuse of any kind against residents is strictly prohibited. Abuse prevention includes recognizing and understanding the definitions and types of abuse that can occur. It is understood by the leadership in this facility that preventing abuse requires staff education, training, and support, and a facility wide culture of compassion and caring. Possible indicators of physical abuse include an injury that is suspicious because the source of the injury is not observed, the extent or location of the injury is unusual or because of the number of injuries either at a single point in time or overtime .Examples of injuries that could indicate physical abuse include but are not limited to: fractures, sprains or dislocations . Review of the facility's incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed, received care and services in accordance with the care plan and physician's orders to maintain skin integrity.The findings included:Review of the clinical record for Resident #7 revealed a readmission date of 6/8/23. Diagnoses included dementia, heart failure and type 2 diabetes.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 1/15/26 revealed Resident #7 scored 13 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating intact cognition.The care plan initiated on 6/12/23 and revised on 12/08/25 revealed Resident #7 had a potential for impaired skin integrity related to impaired mobility, fragile skin, diabetes, neuropathy (damage to peripheral nerves), edema (swelling), impaired cognition, incontinence. The care plan noted that Resident #7 has a history of noncompliance with Geri sleeve (protective sleeve).On 10/7/25, the care plan was updated to reflect a skin tear to the resident's left hand and on 12/8/25, a skin tear to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medical record for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed was complete by failing to safeguard medical record information against destruction.The findings included:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse revealed the steps in the procedure included, .Reconcile the list of medications from the medication history, admitting orders, the previous Medication Administration Record (if available), and the discharge summary from the previous institution, according to established procedures. 12) Contact the Attending Physician to communicate and review the findings of the initial assessment and any other pertinent information and obtain admission orders. Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 5) Orders obtained from the physician; 6) the signature and title of the person recording the data.Review of the facility's Policy titled, Retention of Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident(s') right to be free from neglect when it failed: 1) to provide to structural processes necessary to ensure ongoing incontinence care to two residents (#1 and #2); and 2.) to prevent emotional anguish to 1 resident (#2). The findings included: Record Review of Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol Policy last revised in March 2018 stated that neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, it's employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. The facility management and staff will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse and neglect. Record Review of ADL Policy, last revised on March 2018 stated, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's). Residents who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, as a result of a facility's investigation, when an alleged violation was verified, the facility failed to take appropriate corrective action to protect residents and oversee the implementation of corrective action and evaluate whether it is effective for 2 of 2 incidents reported by the facility. The findings included: On 10/30/24, the facility reported an investigation into 19 possible instances of drug diversion regarding prescribed, as needed, pain medications. During the investigation, the facility interviewed staff and residents, in-serviced staff on misappropriation of property, and discussed the incident in a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting on 11/20/24. The facility investigation concluded that they could not verify any medications were diverted but did verify documentation was incomplete in 19 instances involving 9 separate residents' as needed pain medications. Staff members involved was subsequently terminated. There was no further actions taken to verify this action was effective. On 2/20/25, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided to 2 residents (#1 and #2). The findings included: Record review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Policy, last revised on March 2018 said, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, including Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing care. Resident #1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, impaired gait and mobility, and generalized muscle weakness. Resident #1 requires staff assistance with hygiene care and transfers in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure they posted and updated the nurse staffing information with the facility name and an updated census per shift. The facility further failed to maintain the nursing staffing information for 18 months. The findings included: On 2/5/24 at 9:10 a.m. via observation, the nurse staffing information form dated 2/5/24 located in the main lobby did not have the facility's name and the current census. On 2/5/24 at 4:00 p.m. via observation, the nurse staffing information form posted in the main lobby was dated 2/05/24 and did not contain the resident census, the facility's name, the updated total number of staff, and the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff for 2/05/24. On 2/06/24 at 10:10 a.m. via observation, the nurse staffing information form posted in the main lobby was dated 2/05/24 and did not contain the resident census, the facility's name, the updated total number of staff, and the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff for 2/06/24. On 2/06/24 at 4:10 p.m. via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff, resident and family interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents #12, #29) of 4 residents reviewed received care and services in accordance with professional standards, by failing to implement physician's orders for protective skin sleeves. The findings included: 1. Clinical record review revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Dementia. The physician order effective 10/22/23 included to apply Geri-sleeves (protective sleeves) to both arms for protection. The Care Plan initiated 5/27/21 documented Resident #29, has the potential for impaired skin integrity r/t (related to) impaired cognition, impaired mobility, anorexia, incontinence, malnutrition. The resident needs assistance to apply protective garments; Geri-sleeves to BUE (bilateral upper extremities). On 2/5/24 at 1:56 p.m., 2:51p.m., and on 2/6/24 at 8:45 a.m., Resident #29 was observed in the activity area wearing a short sleeve shirt without Geri-sleeves as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #29) of 1 dependent resident received the appropriate assistance to apply corrective lenses as per the physician's orders and care plan to maintain vision. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Dementia and unspecified age-related cataract. The physician's orders dated 6/30/21 included for the nurse to verify the resident's glasses were on in the morning and remove the glasses at bedtime. The Care Plan revised on 7/1/2021 noted Resident #29 had impaired visual function related to cataracts and used glasses. The interventions included to remind the resident to wear glasses when up. Assist with placing glasses on in the morning, remove at bedtime. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 12/7/23 indicated the resident's vision was adequate with corrective lenses. The care plan summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, clinical records review and facility policy review the facility failed to follow physician's ordered fluid restrictions for 1 (Resident #14) of 2 residents reviewed for hydration management. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled Encouraging and Restricting Fluids, revised October 2010 which stated, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide the resident with the amount of fluids necessary to maintain optimum health. This may include encouraging or restricting fluids. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure . General Guidelines: 1. Follow specific instructions concerning fluid intake or restrictions. 2. Be accurate when recording fluid intake. 3. Record fluid intake on the intake side of the intake and output record. Record fluid intake in ml (milliliter) . 8. Be sure an intake and output record is maintained in the resident's room . Documentation: . 6. The amount (in mLs) of fluids consumed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate remained below 5%. Four licensed nurses with 27 opportunities were observed. Two medication errors were identified resulting in a 7.41% error rate. The findings included: Policies and Procedures titled Administering Medications (reviewed/revised April 2019), specified Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy states 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. On 2/7/24 at 9:01 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff D was observed administering two medications to Resident #23, including Entresto and metoprolol. The physician's orders specified to hold the medications if the systolic blood pressure was less than110 or the heart rate was less than 65 beats per minute. Resident #23 had a heart rate of 60 beats per minute. This indicates the medication should be held per the physician order parameters. On 2/7/24 at 10:50 a.m., in an interview LPN Staff D verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 2/06/24 10:08 a.m. the medication storage room C wing checked with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). During the observation a large white oval pill was found in the sink. Internet search shows it is Metformin (a pill to control blood sugar). Photographic evidence obtained. During an interview on 2/6/24 at 10:09 a.m. ADON stated that she did not know what the large white pill was and she acknowledged that it should not be in the sink in the medication room. On 2/06/24 at 11:25 a.m., LPN Staff Q's medication cart C left was checked and found to have opened over the counter (OTC) liquid medication not labeled with the open date. LPN staff Q confirmed 3 of the bottles did not have an open date on them and she could not know how long they had been in the drawer open. The following medication bottles were observed not dated with open date. -Geri-tussin DM -Liquid pain relief acetaminophen -Iron supplement During an interview on 02/07/24 at 11:45 a.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that her expectation was for nurses when opening OTC liquid medication is to place an open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for 2 (#24 and #61) of 5 residents reviewed. The findings included: The facility Policy for Medication Regimen Review (MRR) with an effective date of 12/1/07 noted, The Consultant Pharmacist will conduct MMRs if required under a Pharmacy Consultant Agreement . The facility should maintain copies of MRRs on file in the facility, either as part of the resident's permanent medical record or in a special file, in accordance with applicable law. Review of the clinical records showed Resident's #24 and #61 were admitted to the facility respectively on 6/12/20 and 3/19/21. The clinical records lacked documentation of a medication regimen review for September 2021. Review of the Consultant Pharmacy Reports for September 2021 showed MRRs were conducted for 17 residents without recommendation and for two residents with recommendations. Residents #24 and #61 were not included in the MMRs. Review of the facility Detailed Census Report for September 2021 showed there were between 84…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to administer medications according to the physician's orders for 1 (Resident #283) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. Three Licensed nurses and 25 opportunities were observed. Two medication errors were identified resulting in an 8% error rate. The findings included: The facility's Instructional Guidelines Manual for Medication Administration revised 08/05/2015 reads, . All medications must be ordered by the Physician . Administer medications within a two (2) hour time frame (one hour before to one hour after the time prescribed by the physician) . When administering medications, always check for the six R's. Right resident, right medications, right time, right route, right dosage, right documentation . On 3/7/22 at 12:00 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff A was observed administering seven (7) different medications to Resident #283, including one tablet of Metoprolol 25 milligrams Extended Release and one tablet of Cefdinir 300 milligrams. The physician's orders dated 3/2/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 resident observed with unsecured prescribed eye drops at the bedside. The findings included: Review of the Policy and Procedure for Storage and Expiration of Medication, Biological, Syringes and Needles with an effective of 12/1/07 (revised 1/1/13) documented . Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked/cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors . Facility should store bedside medications or biologicals in a locked compartment within the resident's room . On 3/9/22 at 9:30 a.m., observed a bottle of Dorzolamide HCL eye drops and a bottle of Timolol Maleate eye drops stored in an empty tissue box on Resident #7's overbed table. In an interview at the time of the observation Resident #7 said she has been using the drops for years and sometimes the nurses just leave the medications in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$35,597 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $28,915 — penalty dated 2025-07-08
  • $6,682 — penalty dated 2024-02-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CCRC OPCO VENTURES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/29/2014
CHENG, PATRICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/31/2022
RUSSO, FRANKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/31/2022
ARCE, NOAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/27/2025
LIFE CARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
HESS, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2020
OLFATO, BLESILDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-125.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 14%Medicare 11%Other / private 75%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$628per resident / day
operating cost
$19,080per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$278per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105538. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next