No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Nspire Healthcare Miami Lakes

5725 NW 186 Street, Hialeah, FL 33015 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (305) 625-9857 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (305) 625-9857 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 16 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
N Kendall Dr & SW 117th Ave
Pharmacy
18400 Nw 75th Pl Ste 106 · (786) 391-3758 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
18496 NW 67th Ave · (305) 822-4636 · Call to confirm hours
Park
18520 NW 67th Ave · (305) 812-2223 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.8%8.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.5%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.9%9.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.3%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.3%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.0%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.5%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.352.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.601.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
19.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 19.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.6%CMS range 39.5–70.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.5–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge19.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge26.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge11.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified65.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.3–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.92
RN hours/ resident / day
0.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
30.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review facility failed to ensure that residents' information was kept confidential on one (Unit one,100-wing med cart) out of four med carts and on one out of 2 units as evidenced by: 1) Open unattended computer screen on the 100-wing med cart. 2) Document with residents' medical information posted on the bulletin board in front of Unit 1. There were 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Observation on 03/09/2026 at 10:28 AM revealed the unattended 100 Wing medication cart computer screen open with residents' information visible.On 03/09/2026 at 10:30 AM Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) stated: I am supposed to either close the computer or put the screen to sleep when I am away from the cart for privacy for the residents.During an interview on 03/09/2026 at 2:49 PM the Director of nursing (DON) stated: Nurses are to close the laptop completely or lock the screen when away room cart to protect residents' information. Observation on 03/09/2026 at 12:08 PM revealed a posting with residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #109) out of two sampled residents with contractures and one (Resident # 8) out of two sampled residents receiving dialysis received treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan as evidenced by: 1)Resident #109 who has a right-hand contracture had no splint device in place. 2) The facility's staff did not administer a phosphorus binding agent in accordance with Resident #109's dialysis care plan. There were 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings include: Resident #109Observation on 03/09/2026 at 10:39 AM revealed Resident #109 in bed with right hand noted contracted and had no splint device in place.On 03/11/2026 at 7:53 AM Resident #109 was observed in bed with no hand splint device in place on the contracted right hand. (photo)On 03/11/2026 at 11:10 AM Resident #109 was observed in bed receiving breathing treatment. There was no hand splint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #109) out of two sampled residents with skin conditions and contracture received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by a dressing on Resident#109's right lower leg that had not been changed in three days despite a physician order for dressing change every other day and no splint device in place on the residents contracted right hand. There were 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:Observation on 03/09/2026 at 10:39 AM revealed Resident #109 in bed receiving oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal canula. The resident's contracted right hand had no splint device in place, and a dressing dated 3/6 was noted on the resident's right lower leg. (photo)On 03/09/2026 at 2:37 PM Resident #109 was observed in bed with no hand splint device in place on the right hand and dressing dated 3/6 noted on the resident's right lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review facility failed to ensure a safe environment on two (100 and 300 wings) out of four wings as evidenced by unattended housekeeping carts containing hazardous chemicals left unlocked by housekeeping staff. There were four housekeeping carts in the facility at the time of survey The findings included:Observational tour on 03/09/2026 at 11:15 AM of the 100-wing revealed Staff D, Housekeeping walking away from the housekeeping cart leaving it unlocked and going down the hall. When staff returned, the surveyor notified Staff D of the identified concern and was asked to view the contents of the cart. It was revealed that the cart contained hazardous chemicals. (photo)On 03/09/2026 at 11:30 AM, the Housekeeping Director was interviewed and revealed all housekeeping carts are to be locked when unattended for the safety of residents.On 03/09/2026 at 11:35 AM, an inspectional tour conducted with the Housekeeping Director of all housekeeping carts in the facility revealed; the 300- wing housekeeping cart was unlocked and the latch was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #100) out of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter, tubing was properly positioned as evidenced by: observation of Resident #100's indwelling urinary tubing coiled and kinked preventing urine from flowing freely and increasing the risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infections and other serious medical issues. There were eight residents with indwelling urinary catheters residing in the facility at the time of surveyThe findings included:On 03/09/2026 at 9:55 AM Resident #100 was observed in bed with no apparent distress; the indwelling urinary tubing was kinked preventing the free flow of urine (photo).On 03/09/2026 at 9:59 AM Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) was made aware of the identified concern and stated, The urinary tubing should allow for the free flow of urine to prevent back flow that can cause infection.Record review of a demographic sheet revealed Resident#100 was re-admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to follow infection control protocol for one (Resident #34) out of seven sampled residents as evidenced by: an observation of a toothbrush in a shared bathroom belonging to Resident #34. There were 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:On 03/19/2026 at 10:06 AM Resident #34 was observed in bed no apparent distress, and a toothbrush was observed in the bathroom (photo). On 03/09/2026 at 11:22 AM Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was made aware of the identified concern and stated, The toothbrush belongs to [Resident # 34]. Further revealed toothbrushes are stored in a plastic bag and kept in the drawer.Record review of a demographic sheet revealed Resident # 34 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Cerebral infarction. Record review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) reference dated 12/5/2025 revealed Resident #34 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure food was prepared under sanitary conditions as evidenced by failure to 1) maintain equipment in the kitchen in a clean sanitary manner, 2) the Unit 2 Pantry Freezer did not contain a thermometer and 3) the Unit 1 Pantry microwave in a clean sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect one hundred and fourteen out of one hundred and fifteen residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include: Record review of the facility's policy titled Nourishment Storage-Pantry (effective date 12/2023) documented: Policy-Resident Nourishments are stored properly to maintain food safety; Procedure-1) An accurate thermometer is maintained inside of the refrigerator and freezer. 1) Observation of the initial kitchen tour on 8/26/24 at 7:59 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager, Senior Food Service Director revealed brown like stains on the inside and outside of the convection oven doors. Photographic evidence submitted. On 8/26/24 at 8:00 AM, interview with the Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews facility failed to provide dignity for one resident (#87) out twelve residents who are assisted with meals as evidenced by an observation of staff standing while assisting Resident#87 with a meal. There were 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The Findings Included: On 8/26/24 at 8:35 AM Resident#87 was seated in the upright position in bed. Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN) was standing while assisting Resident#87 with breakfast. On 8/26/24 08:40 AM Staff H, RN stated, It is the protocol of this facility to set up the resident in the upright position and be at eye level for meals. I'm not sure if I can stand while assisting residents with meals. Also stated I have not received any in-services regarding this. Lastly stated I started in July of 2023. Record review of demographic sheet for Resident#87 revealed an admission date of 1/16/24 with diagnosis that included Dementia. Record review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with reference date of 7/24/24 Section C (Cognitive Status) revealed a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one resident (Resident #34) out of nine sampled residents, as evidenced by hearing aids not included in Section B of the Medicare 5-day MDS with reference date of 7/8/24 despite Resident #34 using hearing aids on a daily basis. The findings included: On 8/26/24 at 9:05 AM Resident #34 signaled to surveyor her inability to hear and to come closer. Hearing aids observed on nightstand. On 8/28/24 at 1:20 PM Resident #34 was seated in a wheelchair near bed. Hearing aids in place. Family at bedside. Record review of demographic sheet for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 6/10/24 with Diagnosis that included: Dementia. Record review of a Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with reference date of 7/8/24 for Resident#34 Section B revealed Hearing- Adequate, Hearing Aid- No, Ability to Understand others: understands. Record review of a Care Plan initiated on 6/10/24 revealed Resident #34 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review facility failed to implement care plans for two residents ( Resident #302 and Resident #252) out of nine sampled as evidenced by splinting device not applied for Resident#302 and no skin treatment done for Resident#252. The findings included: 1) On 8/26/24 at 10:08 AM Resident #302 was observed seated in the upright position in bed. Resident #302's left arm appeared weak and left hand appeared contracted. A splinting device was observed on a wheelchair next to Resident #302's bed. On 8/28/24 at 1:29 PM Resident #302 was seated in a wheelchair next to bed. A splinting device observed in a plastic bag on nightstand. Record review of demographic sheet for Resident #302 revealed an admission date of 8/19/24 with diagnosis that included: Muscle Weakness. Record review of physician orders sheet revealed an order dated 8/23/24 directions: Left resting hand splint for positioning and electrical stimulation application to left upper extremity (LUE) to facilitate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 6 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to implement precautions to prevent catheter related injuries for two residents (Resident # 352 and Resident # 21) out of the three residents with indwelling catheters residing in the facility. As evidenced by Resident # 352 and Resident #21 indwelling catheter tubing were each observed touching the floor; and failed to ensure one out of one resident (Resident #252) with a prescribed order for skin tear treatment was implemented timely. Resident # 352 On 08/28/24 at 9:37 AM Resident #352 was observed seated in her wheelchair propelling along the hallway outside he room, the indwelling urinary catheter tubing was on touching the floor self-propelling wheelchair. (Photo evidence) Review of Resident #352's admission Record indicated an admission dated 08/08/2024. Clinical Diagnoses include but not limited to: Acute kidney failure, Retention of urine, Hydronephrosis with urethral stricture not elsewhere classified. Review of Resident #352's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's quality assurance and assessment committee failed to demonstrate an effective plan of action was implemented to correct identified quality deficiency in the problem areas related to repeated deficient practice for F641 Accuracy of Assessments. The facility was cited for F641 in 2023. This repeated deficient practice has the potential to affect any of the 115 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) revision date 10/24/22 states: The center and organization have a comprehensive, data driven Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. Procedures: Identifying quality deficiencies and Corrective Action: The center will review department system data. If a quality deficiency is identified, the committee will oversee the development of corrective actions The center may choose the method of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a 1) convection oven, food steamer and gas range stove used to prepare food for residents were in good repair and clean and 2) the Unit 1 Pantry microwave was clean. This has the potential to affect one hundred and fourteen out of one hundred and fifteen residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled Maintenance (effective date 11/2014) documented: Policy-The facility's physical plant and equipment will be maintained through a program of preventive maintenance and prompt action to identify areas/items in need of repair; Procedure-The Director of Environmental Services will follow all policies regarding routine periodic maintenance and all employees will report physical plant areas or equipment in need of repair or service to their supervisor. 1) Observation of the initial kitchen tour on 8/26/24 at 7:59 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager, Senior Food Service Director revealed brown like stains on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment in one out of two nursing units for one (Resident #218 residing in room [ROOM NUMBER]-D). The facility had 107 residents at the time of the survey. The findings included: Observation and interview with Resident #218 on 04/24/2023 at 10:26AM revealed she is alert and oriented x3, and she voiced out discomfort with her mattress and nobody has resolved the problem. Resident #218 stated the mattress is bad. Observation revealed the bed's headboard is broken; it has a hole that allows you see the wall through the headboard. Observation of Resident #218 on 04/26/2023 at 12:05pm revealed resident sitting in her wheelchair inside her room, she stated she was good and was in a good mood trying to do exercises on her own. When Resident #218 was asked about her bed, she re-stated nobody took care of the bed though she and her sister has complained to everyone (she does not identify any staff by name or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (Resident # 114) out of 24 residents reviewed for resident assessments. As evidenced by inaccurate coding of MDS section A, subsection A2100 for Discharge Status for Resident #114. There were 107 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Review of the medical records for Resident #114 revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but were not limited to: Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation and Problems related to Care Provider Dependency. Resident #114 was discharged on 04/06/2023. Review of the Physician's Orders Sheet for April 2023 revealed Resident #114 had orders that included but were not limited to: 4/6/2023-Discharge home per family request, home health services-Registered Nurse, Physical therapy, Occupational therapy, Home Health Aide evaluation and treatment. Transportation provided by insurance. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Record Review and Interview, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F584 Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment and F641 Accuracy of Assessment. This practice has the potential to increase the risk of negative outcomes for all residents in the facility. There was a census of 107 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit 02/20/2022, Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment was cited related to the facility failed to maintain room temperatures within an acceptable range of 71 to 81-degrees Fahrenheit for three residents' rooms and facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set(MDS) for one out of twenty three sampled residents, as evidenced by not documenting active diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and medication on the admission MDS. During an interview on 04/27/2023 at 02:43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LAVIE HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2021
LEE, BRADLEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2024
NSPRMC, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/20/2026
CENTO, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2024
PADURA, ANTONIOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/29/2025
REYES, EDUARDOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$682K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 40%Medicare 16%Other / private 44%

This home reported $682K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$350per resident / day
operating cost
$10,627per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$336per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105709. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next