Pine View Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 82.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) staffing information was accurate and corrected prior to submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed in 2025. FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 3 2025 (April 1 - June 30) Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Payroll Based Journal dated 6/1/2025, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to electronically submit timely to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS. A record review of the PBJ Data Report, for FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 3 2025 (April 1 - June 30) revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing, no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for four (4) or more days, and failure to provide licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day. The facility also triggered a one-star…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to a safe, clean, and homelike environment by not ensuring privacy curtains were clean and laundered for two (2) of (19) sampled residents. Residents #9 and #20.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, (undated) revealed, Resident rights. The resident has the right to a dignified existence.8. Safe environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment.A record review of the facility's document, Environmental Services Cleaning Procedure for Common Items (undated) revealed for Walls, Blinds and Curtains the Cleaning Procedure was When visibly dusty or soiled.On 1/12/26 at 11:11 AM, during an observation and interview, Resident #9 reported she requested her privacy curtain be washed due to reddish-brown stains in multiple areas but that it had not been removed or laundered following her request.On 1/13/26 at 2:46 PM, during the Resident Council meeting, residents reported privacy curtains in resident rooms, including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plan interventions were implemented related to anchoring indwelling catheter tubing for one (1) of 19 sampled residents. Resident #85. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 6/4/25, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to.implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each residents.that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing.needs and.meet professional standards of quality.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines.3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Resident #85A record review of the Care Plan Detail revealed Resident #85 had a Focus of .Indwelling Catheter. with Interventions/Tasks of Foley (Indwelling) catheter: check leg anchor q shift.A record review of the Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review and record review, the facility failed to revise the resident's care plan to ensure all appropriate disciplines were assigned to interventions for one (1) of (19) sampled residents. Resident #61. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change, dated 11/14/25, revealed, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary. 2. Procedure for reviewing and revising the care plan. d. The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. e. Staff involved in the care of the resident will report. new or modified interventions. f. Care plans will be modified as needed by the MDS Coordinator or other designated staff member. g. The Unit Manager or other designated staff member will communicate care plan interventions to all staff involved in the resident's care.A record review of the Care Plan Report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order related to ensuring that catheter tubing was anchored to prevent trauma for one (1) of (19) sampled residents. Resident #85.Findings include:On 1/14/26 at 8:36 AM, during an observation and interview, Resident #85 was lying in bed preparing for wound care and was noted to have an indwelling catheter with no leg anchor or strap securing the tubing. Resident #85 stated she would wear a leg anchor for the tubing if the staff provided one. On 1/14/26 at 8:55 AM, during an interview, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 confirmed that Resident #85 did not have a leg anchor in place and reported she was unsure if there was a physician's order related to the leg anchor.On 1/14/26 at 9:29 AM, during an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 reported it was the nurse's responsibility to ensure leg anchors were in place and stated Resident #85 often refused even though she had explained to the resident that leg anchors were used to prevent trauma.On 1/14/26 at 10:30 AM, during an interview, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review and record review, the facility failed to provide enteral feeding care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not documenting the date and time the feeding was hung, which was necessary to alert staff when the bag must be changed to prevent complications such as contamination and infection for one (1) of (12) residents observed with enteral feedings, Resident #5.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes, with a reviewed/revised date of 10/22/25, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to utilize feeding tubes in accordance with current clinical standards of practice, with interventions to prevent complications to the extent possible.On 1/11/26 at 11:45 AM, during an observation, Resident #5 was lying in bed. There was an enteral feeding hanging from a pole. There was no date or label on the bag indicating the date and time it was hung.On 1/11/26 at 11:46 AM, during an interview and observation, Laundry #2 worker who was immediately present in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) regarding anticoagulant medication for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed. Resident #10 Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy MDS with a revision date of 09/25/2017 revealed Policy: The center conducts initial and periodic standardized, comprehensive and reproducible assessments .Procedure .Each person completing a section or portion of a section of the MDS signs the Attestation Statement indicating its accuracy . Record review of the Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/15/24 indicated Resident #10 received anticoagulant medication for seven (7) days during the look back period. Record review of Resident #10's .Order Review Batch Update revealed she had Physician's Orders for Aspirin 81 milligram (mg) (non-steroid anti-inflammatory medication) and Plavix Tablet 75 mg (anti-platelet medication). There were no orders for anticoagulant medications. On 06/19/24 at 2:00 PM, during an interview with the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to a dignified experience, as evidenced by not providing a privacy covering for a urinary drainage bag for one (1) of nine (9) residents with an indwelling catheter. (Resident #17) Findings include: On 6/16/24 11:35 AM, during an observation, Resident #17 was lying in bed and a urinary catheter drainage bag was hanging from the right side of the lower bed. The urinary drainage bag was not covered and the urine in the bag was visible from the hallway. On 6/17/24 at 9:15 AM, in an interview and observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #2, she confirmed Resident #17 had an indwelling catheter and the drainage bag was not covered, making the urine visible. RN #2 explained the visible urine was a dignity issue for the resident. On 6/18/24 at 9:15 AM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she revealed urinary drainage bags should have a privacy covering because it was a dignity issue for the resident. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a Nurse Practitioner's (NP) recommendation for a specialty mattress for a resident with a pressure ulcer (PU) for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed with PUs. Resident #32 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Skin and Wound with revision date of 01/24/2022 revealed Policy: To provide a system for .implementing resident centered interventions to promote skin health, prevention, and healing of pressure injuries . A record review of a timeline provided by the facility of Resident #32's PUs revealed Resident #32 acquired a deep tissue injury (DTI) (a type of pressure injury) to the right and left heel and a left lateral heel DTI on 03/11/24. On 04/02/24, Resident #32 acquired a sacrum wound that was a Stage II PU. She received a specialty (air) mattress on 05/22/24. Record review of Resident #32's Progress Note Details of the wound care NP revealed 4/30/24 . Will order patient air mattress . 5/14/24 .patient has not received air mattress .5/21/24 .The patient has not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper placement of urinary drainage tubing to prevent the possible spread of infection for one (1) of nine (9) residents with an indwelling catheter. (Resident #17) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Urinary Tract Infections (Catheter-Associated), Guidelines for Preventing, revised 9/2017, revealed, . The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) .Steps in Procedure .6 .Do not place the drainage bag on the floor . Record review of the Order Listing Report revealed Resident #17 had a Physician's Order, dated 5/10/24, for a Foley (Indwelling) catheter. On 6/16/24 at 11:35 AM, during an observation, Resident #17 was lying in bed and a urinary catheter drainage bag was hanging from the right side of the lower bed and the drainage tubing on the floor. On 6/17/24 at 9:15 AM, in an interview and observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #2, she confirmed Resident #17 had an indwelling catheter and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $441K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS