Ocean Springs Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 105.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, facility policy review, and facility investigation review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for a Resident #1, who was identified as an elopement and wandering risk for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident #1 On 2/08/25, at approximately 3:00 PM, Resident #1 exited the facility while unsupervised wearing a wander alarm device that was found to be inoperable. The resident was out of the facility unsupervised and walked approximately 0.7 miles for approximately thirty (30) minutes before being located by facility staff and returned to the facility, crossing a four-lane highway. The facility's failure to implement resident's care plan interventions related to wandering and elopement for Resident #1, put this resident and all other residents at risk for wandering and elopement, at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), which began on 2/08/25, when Resident #1 exited the facility. The State Agency (SA) notified the Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility policy review, and facility investigation review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assessment and monitoring of a wandering alarm device to prevent Resident #1, who was identified as an elopement and wandering risk, from exiting the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident #1 On 2/08/25, at approximately 3:00 PM, Resident #1 exited the facility while unsupervised wearing a wander alarm device that was found to be inoperable. The resident was out of the facility unsupervised and walked approximately 0.7 miles for approximately thirty (30) minutes before being located by facility staff and returned to the facility, crossing a four-lane highway. The facility's failure to adequately assess and monitor the resident's wandering alarm device and provide adequate supervision for Resident #1, who was an elopement risk, put this resident and all other residents at risk for wandering and elopement, at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-04-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a timely manner for six (6) of 22 sampled residents and resulted in Resident #57 having skin excoriations and Resident #55 free from wearing two (2) incontinence briefs with a current diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). (Residents #57, #55, #1, #8, #14, and #38) Findings include: Resident #57 On 4/15/24 at 10:00 AM, during an observation, staff were transferring Resident #57 from the bed to an electric wheelchair using a mechanical lift. On 4/15/24 at 4:00 PM, during an observation and interview, Resident #57 was in his electric wheelchair and stated that he had been up in his chair since 10:00 AM and the staff had not changed his brief since then. He explained that he usually wears two (2) incontinence briefs during the day to hold his urine because it takes several staff members to transfer him with the lift and to change him. On 4/15/24 at 4:15 PM, during an observation of incontinence care for Resident #57, Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) #3,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise Resident #1's comprehensive, person-centered care plan to include individualized interventions for physician-ordered wound care for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for care planning, Resident #1.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change, revised 11/14/2025, revealed, Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents experiencing a status change.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change .A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 5/20/26 with diagnoses including Amputation. A record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/26/26 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to timely transcribe physician-ordered wound care into the resident's medical record and failing to document physician-ordered wound treatments in the clinical record for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #1).Findings include:A review of the facility's policy Documentation of Wound Treatments revised 11/7/2025 revealed, Policy: The facility completes accurate documentation of wound assessments and treatments, including response to treatment, change in condition, and changes in treatment.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines.3. Wound treatments are documented at the time of each treatment. A review of the facility's policy Provision of Quality of Care, undated, revealed Policy: Based on comprehensive assessments, the facility will ensure that residents receive treatment and care by qualified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain food quality and hygienic practices in accordance with professional standards for food safety related to overly ripened produce, improperly stored food, exposed food, expired food, and unsanitary handling of ready-to-eat food for two (2) of (2) kitchen observations.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Sanitation Inspections, Nutrition, and Food Service, with an effective date of 11/30/2014, revealed, .Each item is labeled and dated before refrigeration. Avoid indiscriminate handling of foods with fingers. The proper use of hands, gloves and serving utensils shall be taught to all food handlers .On 09/08/2025 at 10:15 AM, during an observation and interview of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), Refrigerator #1 was observed to contain two (2) small plates with individual portions of lettuce, tomato, and onions that were not dated, and one (1) cut piece of overly ripe cucumber with dark spots. Refrigerator #2 was observed to contain four (4) bunches of overly ripe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately report staffing data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) using payroll and other verifiable sources in a uniform format, for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed, FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 3 2025 (April 1-June 20) resulting in the facility triggering for excessively low weekend staffing, no Registered Nurse (RN) hours, and no licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day.Findings include:A record review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the third (3rd) quarter (4/1/25 through 6/30/25) revealed the facility triggered for Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, No RN Hours, and Failed to Have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day. Further review revealed the Infraction Dates for No RN Hours and Failure to Have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day were 4/1/25 through 4/30/25 and 5/1/25 through 5/31/25.A record review of the Staffing Grid, completed by Human Resources staff member Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4, revealed the facility had RN and nursing coverage on all days in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to sustain corrective actions to prevent the recurrence of previously cited deficiencies, specifically, the facility was cited for failing to accurately submit direct care staffing information and failed to ensure the QAPI program was sustained during transitions in leadership to maintain implemented procedures during an annual recertification survey on 4/18/24 and was cited again for the same deficiencies during the current survey, demonstrating that QAPI failed to sustain ongoing monitoring and oversight to prevent recurrence for two (2) of (11) deficiencies cited. F851 and F865/867. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 6/1/25, revealed, .The Center and organization have an ongoing Performance Improvement Program with a design and scope that is ongoing and comprehensive.The design and scope of the program is to systematically monitor and evaluate the quality and appropriateness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to dignity and respect when staff required her to wear a brief against her preference instead of providing a bedpan or assistance to the bathroom for one (1) of (22) sampled residents, Resident #109.Findings include:On 9/9/25 at 11:05 AM, in an interview, Resident #109 reported that the night shift staff told her she would need to wear a brief rather than being assisted to the bathroom or put on a bedpan, despite her reporting that she does not wear briefs.On 09/10/2025 at 4:15 PM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she explained that Resident #109 was already admitted to the facility when she came on shift and she recalled that she thought the resident was wearing a pull-up at that time, and she suggested that a brief might be easier than a pull-up since it would not require pulling up and down. LPN #1 confirmed that the evening shift staff, including herself, used a bedpan for the resident, and she personally assisted the resident onto the bedpan, which she tolerated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's request for assistance in obtaining personal identification, resulting in a delay of more than one (1) year without follow-up affecting her autonomy and ability to exercise her rights related to personal identification and community access for (1) of (22) sampled residents, Resident #48. Findings include:On [DATE] at 12:31 PM, in an interview, Resident #48 stated she had requested assistance from the facility in completing paperwork and obtaining a state identification (ID) card but that her request had not been fulfilled.On [DATE], at 8:34 AM, during an interview, the Social Services Director stated she had no knowledge of Resident #48's request for assistance with obtaining an ID. She reported the resident frequently brought her insurance mail but had not made the ID request directly to her, acknowledging that the resident may have told the Social Services Assistant instead.On [DATE] at 10:50 AM, during an interview, Social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0572 — isolated
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and resident council interview, the facility failed to provide residents or their resident representatives (RRs) with copies of the Resident [NAME] of Rights and admission documents at the time of admission, with the potential to affect all newly admitted residents by depriving them of required information about their rights and responsibilities upon admission for one (1) of 22 sampled residents (Resident #26).Findings include:A review of the facility's admission Agreement revised 5/25, revealed that Section #20 (items a-o) requires residents or their representatives to sign acknowledging receipt of copies received including the Resident [NAME] of Rights, Resident Handbook, and other admissions documents.On 9/8/202 at 2:00 PM, during a resident council meeting, Resident #26 stated she did not recall receiving admission information during the admission process. She stated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].On 9/10/25, at 4:45 PM, an interview with the admissions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to personal privacy by posting identifying hospice information on a resident's door for one (1) of 22 sampled residents. Resident #85.Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights dated 11/30/2014, revealed . The Facility will not use or disclose the resident's health information without the Resident's authorization.On 9/8/25 at 10:26 AM, during an observation of Resident #85's room, signage was posted on the resident's door sign labeled (Proper Name of Hospice Provider) with the resident's first initial and last name highlighted in yellow stated Call (Proper Name of Hospice Provider) First. Resident #85 was lying in bed and was unable to verbalize awareness of hospice services or knowledge of the signage posted on her door.On 9/8/25 at 12:40 PM, during a phone interview with Resident #85's resident representative (RR), she reported that she had not requested the hospice sign to be placed on her mother's door. She explained that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, facility investigation and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy by not reporting and investigating an allegation of misappropriation of resident property in a timely manner for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, Resident #106.Findings Include:A review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation, revised 11/16/2022, revealed, .7. Reporting/Response: Any employee or contracted service provider who.has knowledge of.an allegation of.misappropriation of resident property.is obligated to report such information immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse.Once an allegation of abuse is reported, the Executive Director, as the abuse coordinator, is responsible for ensuring that reporting is completed timely and appropriately to appropriate officials in accordance with Federal and State regulations . Review of report: Report the results of all investigations to the Executive Director or his or her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,410 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $5,181 — penalty dated 2025-02-13
• $5,181 — penalty dated 2025-02-13
• $12,048 — penalty dated 2024-04-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $566K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS