Nspire Healthcare Plantation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The findings included: 1. On 08/19/24 at 8:48 AM, during the initial kitchen tour accompanied by Staff A, Cook, the Dietary Manager and the Registered Dietitian (RD), the following were noted: a. the handles of a spoodle and three spatulas were damaged to a point that they were no longer easily cleanable. b. there was an accumulation of food residues on the blade and the mounting bracket of the table mounted manual can opener. c. there was an accumulation of dust on the air conditioning vent over the food assembly area. d. the wall over and around the door to the walk-in cooler was damaged and tiles were missing. 2. The facility's policy, titled, Handwashing / Hand Hygiene, with a reference date of August 2019, documented, in part: this facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. The policy did not specifically address hand hygiene in the kitchen and for food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, records review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it timely answered call lights in response to residents' needs for 3 of 24 sampled resident, Residents #13, #38, and #55. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On the most recent Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was documented as a score of 15 of 15, indicating the resident was alert and oriented to person, time, and place (cognitively intact). On 08/20/24 at 1:25 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #38 who stated she had voiced multiple complaints regarding the call light response to staff. Resident #38 said at times when the call lights is activated, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) could be observed passing by the room, but they do not bother to come in the room to check. Resident #38 complained that this situation is usually worse on the weekend. In a followup interview with Resident #38 on 08/21/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians' orders for wound treatment and failed to provide wound care in a timely manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents, reviewed for wound care, Resident #18. The findings included: Record review for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Acute Osteomyelitis, Left ankle and Foot; Acquired absence of other left toe(S); Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Review of Section C of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated that he was cognitively intact. Review of Section M revealed that Resident #18 had one unstageable pressure injury presenting as a deep tissue injury (DTI), surgical wound. Review of the Physician's orders showed Resident #18 had an order for left dorsal foot and left lateral foot wound, Cleanse with Normal Saline (N/S) apply skin prep…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to administer the correct type of Aspirin medication, as per physician's order for 1 of 5 sampled residents observed during a Medication Administration Observation, Resident #94. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on 08/19/24 at 2:30 PM, titled, Specific Medication Administration Procedures, provided by the facility's Regional Nurse, reviewed May 2022 documented, in part, in the Policy Statement: Administration Procedures for all Medications - To administer medications in a safe and effective manner. Procedures: .C. Review five (5) rights (3) times: 1) Prior to removing the medication package/container from the cart/drawer: a. Check Medication Administration Record (MAR)/Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for order e. Prepare resident for medication administration. 2) Prior to removing the medication from the container. a. Check the label against the order on the [DATE]: After…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate records related to dressing change for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for wound care, Resident #18; and failed to ensure complete and adequate documentation for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed as deceased in the facility, Resident #99. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Documentation of Progress, dated [DATE], included the following: Documentation of a resident's condition will provide an accurate and timely record of their progress taking into consideration their acuity and length of stay. 1. Record review for Resident #18 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Acute Osteomyelitis, Left ankle and Foot; Acquired absence of other left toe(S); Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Review of Section C of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during medication administration for 1 of 11 sampled residents reviewed for EBP, Resident #53; failed to ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) gowns were available on the 2nd floor for 8 of 11 residents who were on EBP; failed to have appropriate signage posted to indicate precautions for 1 of 11 sampled residents reviewed for EBP, Resident #53; failed to properly utilize hand hygiene and discard a used lancet after Blood Glucose check during medication administration observation for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #3; and failed to ensure a sanitary environment during perineal care for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Resident #56. The census at the time of the survey was 90 residents. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 09/01/22, included in part the following: EBP [Enhanced Barrier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow-up on monitoring residents with a change in condition for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for death in the facility, Resident #1. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Syncope (fainting), Heart Attack, Chronic Pulmonary Edema (fluid in lungs), Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Alcohol Use. Review of the admission progress note dated [DATE] at 7:08 AM documented the resident was admitted to the facility and was receiving oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal canula. The progress note further documented the resident's vital signs were within normal limits, and the resident was very drowsy and lethargic, hard to arouse, and appeared confused. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed orders dated [DATE] revealed an order for vital signs every shift. Further review of Resident #1's records revealed the last documentation of the resident's condition / vital signs was on [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare, store and serve food in a sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards. The findings included: 1). During the initial kitchen tour on, 06/19/23 at 9:24 AM, accompanied by the Dietary Manager, the following were noted: a. the surface of the top of the counter mounted toaster was showing signs of wear and peeling b. there was an accumulation of food residue on the blade of the counter mounted manual can opener. At the conclusion of the initial kitchen tour, the Dietary Manager acknowledged understanding of the concerns. 2). On 06/20/23 at 9:10 AM, Resident #85 was provided lunch to take to dialysis that consisted of a sandwich that was made up of sliced deli meat and cheese, 2 containers of apple juice and graham crackers. It was noted that there was no cooling medium in the soft-sided cooler that was provided to the resident to maintain foods at safe temperatures. During an interview with Staff A, Dietary Aide,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to secure 3 of 6 medication carts, failed to secure 1 treatment cart, and failed to secure meds at the bedside for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #143) The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications with a revised date of January 2018 included: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access. 1) Record review for Resident #343 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Right Femur, Pain in Right Hip, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to assist residents during meals in a dignified manner for 2 of 4 residents observed for dignity (Residents #82 and #66) and the facility failed to provide privacy for 1 of 4 residents observed for dignity (Resident #90). The findings included: 1) Record review for Resident #82 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Legal Blindness, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase, and Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #82 dated 03/24/23 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating an intact cognitive response. Revealed in Section G for dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene all had a self-performance of total dependence with support of one person assist. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #82 dated 03/27/23 with a focus on the resident has an ADL (Activity of Daily Living) self-care performance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$35,989 in federal fines across 8 penalties.

• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
• $11,645 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
• $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
• $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,233 — penalty dated 2023-10-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $502K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL