Nspire Healthcare Lauderhill
2599 NW 55th Ave, Lauderhill, FL 33313 · For profit - Corporation · 109 certified beds · (954) 485-8873 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.3% | 8.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.8% | 9.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.5% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.7% | 10.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.0% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.4% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 46.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 56% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 6.7–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 5.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.7–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.48 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 100.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to complete in a timely manner, based on the resident's needs and included in the record, the resident's discharge needs and discharge plan for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #1. The findings included: Record review of the provided document, titled, SS-160, Discharge Planning, with an effective date of 11/30/14, revealed that discharge planning begins the day of admission. Statement #2 revealed that discharge planning record will be completed within seven days after admission. Statement #6 revealed that within 24 to 48 hours, or the next day after discharge to home, a follow-up phone call, or if necessary, a home visit will be made to ascertain that community services / referrals are indeed being provided according to the discharge plan. Record review documented Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Sepsis following a Hospital Procedure, Acute Respiratory Failure, Alkalosis, and Osteomyelitis. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the failed to facility to ensure Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) have the competencies and skill sets necessary to provde residents' needs of Intravenous (IV) antibiotics for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #1, as evidenced by lack of required IV training and certificate. The findings included: Review of the professional key standard for Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) documented: LPNs must be certified in IV [intravenous] therapy and have completed 30 hours of post-graduation IV hydration training, including 4 hours dedicated to central line care. Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Sepsis following a Hospital Procedure, Acute Respiratory Failure, Alkalosis, and Osteomyelitis. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment under Section C of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed that Section C was disabled by question C600, indicating Resident #1 had signs and symptoms of delirium. Section N…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a dignified manner during dining for 8 of 21 sampled residents, Resident #8, Resident #19, Resident #29, Resident #76, Resident #90, Resident #5, Resident #26 and Resident #83; and failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) regarding dining for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for ADLs, Resident #73. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, indicating moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Record review revealed Resident #90's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed a BIMS of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review revealed Resident #73's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] had a BIMS score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review revealed Resident #83's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the bathroom Emergency call light system was accessible and within easy reach of the residents and staff members for 7 of 53 residents observed (Resident #95, Resident #45, Resident #3, Resident #29, Resident #17, Resident #76 and Resident #23), in the secure, locked unit. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on 09/12/24 at 11:44 AM, titled, Call Bell System, provided by the Administrator effective date 11/30/14, documented, in part, in the Policy Statement: Resident must have, at all times, a system to notify staff when assistance is needed Procedure: .will be placed within reach of any resident . Record review revealed Resident # 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, Hypertension and Depression. Resident #95 ambulates in and out of her bathroom throughout the day. She had a documented Brief Interview Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and failed to implement a care plan for an anticoagulant for 1 of 24 sampled residents, Resident #88. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility post hospitalization on 08/14/24, with admitting diagnoses that included Unspecified Cirrhosis of Liver, Coronary Artery Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 08/15/24, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Section I of this MDS revealed the resident had Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Review of the record revealed there was no care plan that addressed PTSD. An interview was conducted with the MDS Coordinator on 09/10/24 at 3:10 PM, who was responsible for putting a care plan in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with making eye appointment for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for vision, Resident #89. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Unspecified Dementia Unspecified Severity with Agitation, Altered Mental Status, Delirium Due to Known Physiological Condition, and Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations Due to Known Physiological Condition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #89 dated 05/22/24 documented in Section B under Corrective lenses (contacts, glasses, or magnifying glass) used in completing B1000, Vision was answered yes. Documentation in Section C revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. A telephone interview was conducted on 09/10/24 at 10:22 AM with the family member of Resident #89 who stated she brought it to attention of staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify weight loss, and provide nutritional intervention in a timely manner for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #32 and Resident #7. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Weighing the Resident, revised on 05/06/2022, showed the following: Record weight and alert nurse to any significant change. Notify the Physician of any significant weight change and consult the Dietitian. Record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that inclluded Muscle wasting, History of falling, Dementia, Muscle weakness, and Anemia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 indicating severe cognitive impairement. In an observation conducted on 09/10/24 at 8:48 AM, Resident #32 received her breakfast tray. At 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) came into the room and sat near…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians' orders for tube feeding for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for nutrition, Resident #69. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #69 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia, History of falling, Muscle Weakness, and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the Physician's orders revealed the following: a. On 09/04/24, Enteral feeding continuous with Jevity 1.5 (tube feeding formulary type), at 75 milliliters (ml) an hour for 20 hours or until 1500ml has infused with off feeding time at 10:00 AM. b. On 09/10/24. Enteral feeding is continuous with Jevity 1.5 (tube feeding formulary type) at 75 milliliters (ml) an hour for 20 hours or until 1500ml has been infused. c. On 09/11/24. Enteral feeding two times a day for one day bolus feeding with Jevity 1.5 (237ml) times 2 for one day. Review of the weight log for Resident #69 showed the following: On 05/02/24, a weight of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to timely assess a resident with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and failed to provide psychosocial services to meet the need for PTSD diagnosis for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PTSD, Resident #88. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, PTSD Procedure and Policy, effective 08/14/20 and revised 11/20/20, documented, in part, Upon admission, all residents will be screened for potential PTSD using a standardized tool, such as the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Residents identified with PTSD will be offered individualized care plans that include: trauma-informed therapy or counseling, medication management (if appropriate). Record review revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility post hospitalization on 08/14/24, with admitting diagnoses that included Unspecified Cirrhosis of Liver, Coronary Artery Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide psychosocial services to meet the need for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) diagnosis for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PTSD, Resident #88. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, PTSD Procedure and Policy, effective 08/14/20 and revised 11/20/20, documented, in part, Upon admission, all residents will be screened for potential PTSD using a standardized tool, such as the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Residents identified with PTSD will be offered individualized care plans that include: trauma-informed therapy or counseling, medication management (if appropriate). Review of the job description for the Director of Social Services revealed the purpose of the job position is to ensure that the medically related emotional and social needs of the resident are met/maintained on an individual basis. The duties and responsibilities of the Social Service Director include conduct and document a social services evaluation, including identification of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for 2 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medication reconciliation, Residents #19 and #306. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included the following: Obesity, Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility and Muscle Weakness (generalized). Review of the physician's orders for Resident #19 revealed an order for Tramadol HCL 50mg give 50mg by mouth every 12 hours as needed for pain. Review of the Medication Monitoring / Control Record for Resident #19 for the medication Tramadol HCL 50mg documented the medication was given on 07/15/24 at 9:00 PM and again on 08/25/24 at 4:33 PM. Review of the MAR for Resident #19 for the month of July 2024 revealed no documentation for the medication Tramadol HCL 50mg being administered on 07/15/24. Review of the MAR for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate diet consistency for a Mechanical soft diet for 2 of 27 residents, Residents #7 and #41, during dining observation. This had the potential to affect 27 residents who were on a mechanical soft diet. The findings included: Review of the facility's 'National Dysphagia Diet Level 3 Advanced' revealed the following: The advanced diet consists of food of varying textures except for very hard, sticky, or crunchy foods. Foods need to be served moist and ground, chopped, or in bite-size pieces less than 1 inch long. It further showed foods to avoid, such as undercooked fibrous, tough, or stringy vegetables, such as cabbage, asparagus, and celery. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of orders revealed an order, dated 02/8/23, for a No Added Salt (NAS) diet with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was observed during 1 of 3 visits conducted in the Main Kitchen. The findings included: In a tour of the Main Kitchen conducted on 09/09/24 at 9:00 AM with the Kitchen Manager, the following were noted: a. Small flying insects were noted in the dishwashing area near an opened round garbage dumpster. A Drainage treatment system that was not connected was noted underneath the dishwashing machine. In this observation, the Kitchen Manager said that she called an outside company to come and treat the flying insects that were observed last week in the kitchen. She did not know why the treatment system was disconnected and said, It is not connected to the main tube. She then proceeded to connect the treatment system to the correct tubing. b. The walk-in refrigerator had an internal thermometer, which showed a temperature of 55 degrees Fahrenheit and not the recommended 40 degrees Fahrenheit or below. The walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dignity, Resident #13. The findings included: Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia and Cerebral Atherosclerosis. The care plan dated 07/10/23 revealed that Resident #13 is rarely understood with communication problems related to Dementia. In an observation conducted on 07/10/23 at 9:55 AM, Resident #13 was observed in her bed with her shirt lifted and fully exposing her bare breast, visible from the doorway. Closer observation showed that her curtain was fully opened. Staff members were observed walking by the opened door and not making any attempts to close the door or pull the curtains around Resident #13. In another observation conducted on 07/10/23, at 10:20 AM, 25 minutes later, Resident #13 was observed in her bed with her shirt lifted and fully exposing her bare breast, visible from the doorway. Closer observation showed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment on 1 of 4 units, the 400 unit. The findings included: During observations of residents' rooms conducted on 07/10/23 and 07/11/23, and a subsequent facility observation tour conducted on 07/12/23 at 8:09 AM with the Maintenance Director, the following environmental concerns were noted: 400 rooms unit: (a) 413 - bathroom floor linoleum was bubbling up and was uneven, bathroom sink cabinet was damaged, and the door was broken, overhead lights were not working and the closet wood was broken. (b) 412 - bathroom sink was loose, and the floor was stained. (c) 408 - bathroom sink cabinet was damaged and the baseboard around was loose. (d) 406 - the wall behind the bed was in disrepair. (e) 405 - baseboard behind the dresser was loose. (g) 402 - bathroom wall paint needed a touch up; bathroom cabinet was damaged and baseboard around it was loose. (h) 400 - the room television was on, and no picture noted. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) form for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR, Residents #46 and #299. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Pre-admission Screening revised on 11/30/14 documented .the pre-admission screening is completed by the referring human service agency .the company will review the pre-admission screening upon receipt . 1. Review of Resident #46's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE], and no readmissions. The resident's diagnoses included Unspecified Malignant Neoplasm of Skin, Diabetis Mellitus (DM), Anxiety, Parkinson's Disorder, Dementia, Depression and Psychosis. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating the resident had severe cognition impairment. Review of Resident #46's revealed a hand written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to secure over-the-counter (OTC) medication packets for 1 of 24 sampled residents observed during initial pool process, Resident #75; failed to secure OTC nasal spray and chest rub for 1 of 24 sampled residents observed during initial pool process, Resident #71; failed to secure an unidentified, unsecured, loose pill capsule outside of the main dining room floor in the hallway; failed to secure an unlocked and unattended medication cart for 1 of 4 medication carts on North wing, cart 300 hallway; failed to properly dispose a controlled substance during Medication Administration for Resident #83; and failed to keep the medication cart trash-can lid closed on the North wing 400 hallway. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on 07/13/23 at 10 AM, titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised January 2018, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), documented, in part: In the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have a qualified Registered Dietitian to supervise and monitor the Dietetic Technician Register (DTR) scope of practice for high nutritional risk residents for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding initial assessments, Resident #251 and Resident #42. The findings included: A review of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Scope of Practice for the Dietetic Technician, Registered (DTRs) dated June 2013, showed, in part, the following: For DTRs, the scope of practice focuses on food and nutrition and related services provided by DTRs who work under the supervision of an RD when in direct patient / client nutrition care, and who may work independently in providing general nutrition education to healthy populations, consulting to foodservice business and industry, conducting nutrient analysis, data collection and research, and managing food and nutrition services in a variety of settings (https://www.jandonline.org/article/S2212-2672(12)01935-1/fulltext). Record review showed that Resident #251 was on tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a system was in place to ensure residents received the correct enhanced food items on their meal trays as per physicians' orders during dining observations for 3 of 3 sampled residents observed, Resident #13, Resident #23 and Resident #25. The findings included: A review of the facility's recipe book showed they have four food items that may be used as Enhanced foods: Enhanced Pudding, Enhanced Potatoes, Enhanced Cereal, and Enhanced Scrambled Eggs. 1. Record review showed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; and had a physician order for an enhanced diet, pureed texture, dated 10/05/20. In an observation conducted on 07/11/23 at 8:31 AM, Resident #13 was noted in her room with her breakfast tray. Closer observation showed a tray with a meal ticket for Enhanced Pureed. The tray was noted with different types of pureed texture food items, but no identification was noted on which food item was the enhanced food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and chart review, facility staff failed to practice adequate hand hygiene for 2 of 2 sampled residents during dining observations, Resident #13 and Resident #6. The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Dietary, revised on 09/18/2018, showed that Staff must sanitize before passing each tray and wash hands before delivering the next tray if they have handled room items or Resident clothing. 1. Record review showed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia and Cerebral Atherosclerosis. The care plan dated 07/10/23 revealed that Resident #13 is rarely understood. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that under section G for eating, Resident #13 needs extensive assistance with one-person physical assistance. In an observation conducted on 07/10/23 at 12:50 PM in the memory lock unit, Resident #13 was noted in her room. Continued observation showed Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), looking at her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the binding arbitration agreement explicitly granted the resident or their representative the right to rescind the contract within 30 calendar days of signing it for 3 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for arbitration agreements, Resident #61, Resident #38, and Resident #399. The findings included: 1. Record review showed that Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and that she had entered into a binding arbitration agreement. Further review showed that the agreement needed to be signed and dated by Resident #61. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that Resident #61 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, which indicated moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Review of the arbitration agreement that the facility provided did not show that the resident / family had the right to rescind the contract within 30 calendar days of signing it. 2. Record review showed that Resident #38…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the physician in a timely manner when a change in condition was identified for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Change in Condition, Resident #71, as evidenced by a delay in notification Resident #71 was experiencing acute right hip pain as a result of a right hip fracture. The findings included: Review of the facility policy for Notification of Change in Condition, dated and revised 12/16/20 stated in part, 'The Center to promptly notify the Patient / Resident, the attending physician, and the Resident Representative when there is a change in the status or condition. Procedure: The nurse to notify the attending physician and Resident Representative when there is an Accident; Significant change in the patient's/resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status.' Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Depression and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments related to discharge MDS and Quarterly MDS for 2 of 24 sampled residents, Residents #2 and #239. The findings included: 1. Chart review showed that Resident #2 was readmitted on [DATE] with Psychosis, Depressive Disorder and Muscle Weakness. The last Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) compled was on 10/03/21. Further review showed that no Quarterly MDS was completed for Resident #2, which should have been done in January 2022. 2. Chart review showed that Resident #239 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 11/20/21. Further chart review did not show that a discharge MDS was completed for Resident #239 before discharge. An interview conducted on 03/02/22 at 3:45 PM with the MDS coordinator who stated that she is the only MDS coordinator in the facility and that another consultant MDS overlooks her work daily. She further noted that every day the electronic system would give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan according to the resident's needs and follow the care plan according to the resident's needs for dining assistance for 2 of 24 sampled residents, Resident #56 and Resident #33. The findings included: 1. Record review showed that Resident #56 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, in part, of Dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that for eating under Section G, Resident #56 needed extensive assistance with one person assist. A review of the Care Plan, dated 02/25/22, showed Resident #56 has impaired cognitive function / dementia or impaired thought process related to Dementia. In an observation conducted on 02/28/22 at 12:52 PM, Resident #56 was noted in his room eating the lunch meal. Closer observation showed that staff was in the room assisting with the lunch meal. In an observation conducted on 03/01/22 at 8:10 AM, Resident #56 was noted in his room waiting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary which included a complete recapitulation of residents stay and reconciliation of all the pre/post-discharge medications; and failed to develop a post-discharge plan of care that included discharge instructions for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for discharge, Resident #238. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #238 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged from the facility on 11/24/21. The diagnoses included, Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral disturbance among others. A family member was delegated as the representative / durable power of attorney. During an interview conducted with Resident #238's authorized representative (AR) / Power of Attorney (POA) on 03/03/22 at 9:58 AM, the POA stated that Resident #238 was discharged from the facility on 11/24/21. She was contacted by the Social Services Director (SSD) of the facility who informed her that the nurse had forgotten to give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for Activities, Resident #54, was offered and provided with preferred activities as evidenced by Resident #54 was not provided with activities of his choice. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Traumatic Subdural Brain Hemorrhage, Parkinson's Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Seizures, Aphasia (inability to communicate verbally) and Dysphagia (inability to eat or drink by mouth). Resident #54 has a feeding tube for all his nutrition and hydration needs, with the tube feeding commencing at 2:00 PM daily and infusing over a 20-hour period. Resident #54 is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of the facility's Activity Program Policy and Procedure, revised 11/01/15, stated in part, 'An ongoing wide range of therapeutic programs, interventions and techniques designed and offered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure measures were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #68, reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury, as evidenced by physician recommendations for pressure ulcer prevention were not followed, increasing the risk of pressure ulcer development for Resident #68. The findings included: On 02/28/22 at 9:45 AM, an initial observation was conducted of Resident #68 seated in his wheelchair in the hallway outside of his room. In an attempt to conduct an interview, it was noted the resident was cognitively impaired and was not able to provide appropriate answers to the questions asked. An observation was then conducted inside of the resident's room and his bed was observed to have an air mattress on it with the air mattress compressor box attached to the foot board of the bed. Further observation revealed the air mattress compressor box was not turned on. When the end of the mattress was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow up on tube feeding regimen changes in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for tube feeding, Resident #64. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy, titled, Nutritional Assessment, dated 09/17/18, showed that Residents at high nutritional risk will be assessed in a timely manner by the Dietitian. It further showed that the nutritional care plan is communicated to the rest of the interdisciplinary team. In an observation conducted on 02/28/22 at 10:13 AM, Resident #64's tube feeding was observed running with Jevity 1.5 (formulary) at 50 millimeters (ml) an hour. It further showed that the tube feeding bottle was started at 2:00 AM the night before. A review of the chart showed that Resident #64 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Dysphagia, and Schizophrenia. A review of the Physician's orders showed the following tube feeding changes: On 01/12/22, the tube feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the residents' approved menu during dining observation for 2 sampled Residents #51 and #56, of the 13 residents receiving puree diets. This could affect all 13 residents receiving pureed diets. The findings included: A review of the Cycle 1, Week 2 Regular Diet menu showed the following: Glazed meatloaf, new potatoes, red cabbage, wheat roll, margarine, and apple pie. In an interview conducted on 02/28/22 at 1:50 PM with Staff E, Cook, he stated that because he didn't have enough red cabbage for all of the residents, he decided to substitute the menu on the pureed diet for green beans. 1. In an observation conducted on 02/28/22 at 1:24 PM, Resident #51 was observed with her lunch meal. Closer observation showed the following: pureed glazed meatloaf, pureed potatoes, and pureed green beans. A record review was conducted for Resident #51. She was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Noted in her Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 residents of 3 sampled residents observed during dining, Resident #27, Resident #51, and Resident #20. The findings included: 1. In an observation conducted on 02/28/22 at 12:45 PM, the first tray cart arrived on the 100's unit with the lunch meals. The cart was placed in the hallway, and the staff was observed passing the lunch trays to all residents. Continued observation showed that Patient #51's lunch tray was left on the meal cart while all the other lunch trays were given to the residents. At 1:25 PM, 40 minutes later, the staff took the lunch meal from the meal cart and brought it into Resident #51's room. A record review was conducted for Resident #51. She was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Noted in her Quarterly Minimum Data Set completed on 01/15/22 in the section regarding cognitive patterns, it shows that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-03 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct consistency for the mechanical soft diet during dining observation for 4 sampled residents, Residents #49, #17, #29, and #70, of the 14 residents ordered to receive mechanical soft diets. The findings included: Review of the Nutrition Care Manual under section Dysphagia Level 3: Advanced or Mechanical Soft, showed the following: no hard sticky or crunchy foods, foods should be moist, meat cut up and chopped, food particles are served in bite-sized pieces and less than 1 inch, and crunchy bread are not allowed (https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/topic.cfm?ncm_toc_id=273657). 1. A record review was conducted for Resident #49 that showed initially being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set was completed on 01/17/22 in the section regarding cognitive patterns. It is shown that a Brief Interview for Mental Status was unable to be conducted due to her mental status. She has a medical history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to keep food safety requirements with storage, preparation, and distribution that is in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that included failure to maintain sanitary conditions. The findings included: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 02/28/22 at 8:51 AM with Staff F, Dietary Manager (DM), Staff E, Cook, and the Maintenance Director (MD). The following observations were noted: 1. In the food preparation area, 1 bin containing a bag of thickener powder was left open to air (Photographic evidence obtained) 2. Also in the food preparation area, a garbage can lid was left open (Photographic evidence taken) 3. In the plate warmer were 5 discolored scoop plates and 5 discolored plates noted (photographic evidence obtained) 4. In the walk-in refrigerator, it was noted that the ceiling had a moderate amount of black, spotty residue. 5. In the dry storage room, it was noted that a box of split bananas were on a shelf (Photographic evidence obtained); and there was a heavy accumulation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly to ensure a potential health hazard. The findings included: During the initial kitchen / food service observation tour conducted on 02/28/22 at 9:10 AM, the outside dumpster area was noted with the following: 1. 1 large green garbage dumpster was noted to be overflowing with clear garbage bags on top. 2. The area surrounding the dumpster had dirty used gloves, debris, and broken glass with a flying insect around it. In an interview conducted on 02/28/22 at 9:11 AM, the facility's Maintenance Director stated that the garbage gets picked up 3 or 4 days a week but was unsure of the times and days of the week. In another interview conducted on 02/28/22 at 10:00 AM, the facility's Maintenance Director stated that he checked the schedule and that the garbage gets picked up 3 days a week.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for high risk medications, Residents #2 and #32. The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. The diagnoses included in part the following: Unspecified Intracapsular Fracture of Left Femur Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Delayed Healing, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 08/09/24 revealed in Section C, a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Documented in Section N under high risk medications: 'antiplatelet is taking' was answered 'no'; and 'anticoagulant was taking' was answered 'yes'. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #2 revealed an order dated 08/06/24 for aspirin 81 mg give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLNM MASTER TENANT, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2018 |
| FC INVESTORS XXI LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2018 |
| LAVIE HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2021 |
| LV INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2018 |
| NSPR CARE CENTERS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2018 |
| NSPR OPERATIONS I, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2018 |
| NSPR OPERATIONS II, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/19/2018 |
| LEE, BRADLEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/10/2024 |
| NSPRMC, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/24/2026 |
| OYETORO, OYEDEPO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/10/2021 |
| PORTNOVA, REGINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/19/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $508K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105680. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.