Terrace Of Hialeah, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

19.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 276 beds and averages 232.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.99 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was delivered as prescribed for five residents (#9, #90, #214, #240, and #258) out of 37 residents on oxygen therapy. As evidenced by oxygen observed being administered at incorrect rates via nasal cannula from concentrators. There were 235 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include.During observations on 12/02/25 at 10:13 AM, 12/03/25 at 08:46 AM Resident # 9 was in bed with oxygen (02) running via nasal canula (NC) at 3.5 liters per minute (lpm).On 12/04/25 at 11:57 AM Resident # 9 was in bed with oxygen running via nasal canula at 3 liters per minute (lpm).Review of the medical records for Resident #9 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Review of the Physician's Orders Sheet for December 2025 revealed Resident # 9 had orders that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. As evidenced by repeat citations related to F0584 - Housekeeping and Maintenance, F0645 - Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, F0695 - Respiratory Care and F0867- QAPI/Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Improvement Activities). There were 235 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include. Review of the facility's survey history revealed during the recertification survey with an exit date of 06/26/2024, the facility was cited: F0584: Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment; F0645-PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), for incomplete PASARR documentation, and F0695-Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning for failure to ensure prescribed respiratory care and F0867- QAPI/Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Improvement Activities).During the current survey with an exit date of 12/05/2025, the surveyors identified repeated deficient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a sanitary, clean and homelike environment as evidenced by soiled stains on toilet seats in residents' bathroom, trash on floor in residents' bathroom, dirty hallway walls, and ripped bedside chair cushions in a resident's' room. There were 235 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include.Observation on 12/02/25 starting at 09:48 AM during the initial resident and room screenings on the facility's [NAME] Unit revealed:Rooms 124 red and green colored stains on toilet seat in resident's bathroom.Rooms 122, 126-soiled trash on floor in resident's bathroom.room [ROOM NUMBER]-Ripped bedside chair cushion.Rooms 101-116 hallway walls with scruff marks, black spots, stains, scrapes, dents and dings on the walls.Interview on 12/05/2025 at 5:43 AM, the Director of Housekeeping revealed reported there are seven housekeeping staff that work 5:00 AM to 1:30 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (Resident #9) out of 6 residents reviewed for resident assessments. As evidenced by inaccurate coding of MDS for Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs related to Oxygen therapy for Resident #9. There were 235 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings include. During several observations on 12/02/25, 12/03/25, 12/04/25 and 12/05/25 Resident#9 was in bed with oxygen running via nasal canula.Review of the medical records for Resident #9 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Review of the Physician's Orders Sheet for December 2025 revealed Resident #9 had orders that included but not limited to: 07/13/25-oxygen (O2) at three Liters per minute (LPM) via nasal canula (NC) continuously every shift.Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for one (Resident # 16) out of two sampled residents, as evidenced by not including Serious Mental Illness (SMI) diagnosis on the resident's PASARR form. There were 235 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include.Record review of a policy titled Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) revealed it is the policy of the facility to ensure that all residents receive a PASARR in accordance with State and Federal requirements and that the PASARR is updated whenever mental health diagnoses or conditions change. Observations on 12/02/25 at 10:43 AM Resident #16 was awake in low bed, on 12/03/25 at 11:58 AM and on 12/04/25 at 12:26 PM Resident #16 was observed in room being fed by staff no concerns noted.Resident #16 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-entered the facility on 12/11/24 with medical diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for residents as evidenced by during several observations, garbage was observed on the floor in several residents' rooms, bed linen was observed on resident's bed with multiple holes, hole in wall in resident's room, and dirty walls in resident's room. There were 231 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings Included: During observation on 06/23/24 at 06:18 AM rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were observed with garbage on the floor. On 06/23/24 at 06:35 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with garbage on the floor, on 06/23/24 at 06:39 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with garbage/papers on floor, on 06/24/24 at 07:41 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A was observed with several holes on the bed linen. On 6/24/24 at 11:00 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a huge hole in the wall close to the electrical outlet and several brown colored stains on the wall (Photos available).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #435) out of 35 sampled residents was free from the use of physical restraints. As evidenced by during an observation the resident's bed was positioned with the foot of the bed elevated and the head of the bed flat, the overbed table was positioned by the side of the bed in the middle, preventing the resident from getting out of the bed without assistance. There were 231 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: During observation on 06/23/24 at 06:18 AM, Resident #435 was in bed asleep, the bed was in the lowest position, the foot of the bed was elevated, and the head of the bed flat, the overbed table was positioned by the side of the bed in the middle (photo available). Observation on 06/24/24 at 07:45 AM the resident was in bed asleep, the bed was in the lowest position, in flat position from head to toe and the overbed table at the side of bed. On 06/25/24 at 11:30 AM the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I PASRR was not completed for four (Resident # 60, Resident # 3, Resident #112 and Resident #127) out of four residents investigated. This deficiency had the potential to affect 231 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Resident # 60 During multiple observations starting on 06/23/24 to 06/26/24, Resident # 60 was in the room in bed and no distress noted. The resident never responded to questions asked. Record review of the clinical records for Resident # 60 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included, but not limited to, Other Secondary Parkinsonism; Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified; Unspecified Psychosis; Adult Failure to Thrive. Record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section A Identification dated 05/12/24 revealed the section 1500 Is the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review facility failed to provide a safe environment for one resident (Resident #188) out of ten residents sampled as evidenced by a bundle of shaving razors observed in the drawer next to the resident's bed. There were 231 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 06/23/24 at 11:27 AM Resident#188 was observed laying in bed with eyes closed, a bundle of shaving razors was observed in the drawer next to bed. (photo evidence) On 06/23/24 at 11:27 AM Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN) was notified by surveyor and entered room with surveyor. Staff G, RN retrieved the bundle of razors and stated; these razors should not be in here for safety reasons because [Resident #188] can reach into drawer. I think a staff member left the razors in drawer. Record review of demographic sheet for Resident #188 revealed an admission date of 3/27/23 with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Record review of Annual Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was being received as prescribed for one Resident (#123) out of 35 sampled residents. As evidenced by, during several observations of Resident #123 the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine was positioned on Resident #123's forehead. The findings included: During several observations on 06/23/24 starting at 06:31 AM, 07:15 AM and 08:03 AM Resident #123 was observed with the CPAP machine located on her forehead. The CPAP machine was turned on and running. 06/24/24 at 07:53 AM Resident #123 was in bed asleep, oxygen (02) was running via nasal cannula (NC) at two (2) liters per minute (LPM), the call light was on the bed. On 06/25/24 at 11:29 AM resident was in bed awake, 02 running at 2 LPM via NC, no distress noted. On 06/23/24 at 08:06 AM Registered Nurse (Staff C) assigned to the resident stated that the resident takes off her CPAP machine herself, but it is time for it to be removed for breakfast, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELEVATE CARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL