Pine Trail Nursing And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents and injuries, and ensure a safe environment, failed to ensure a complete investigation and follow up were completed for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for falls, Resident #32. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Unspecified Intracapsular Fracture of left femur, Hypertension, and Major Depression. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of a fall investigation and nursing progress note dated 09/23/24 at 6:00 AM revealed the resident was found on the floor next to his bed. The resident was observed laying on his left side. He was unable to give a description of what happened and was showing signs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate hot water temperatures for 3 of 31 residents' rooms (Rooms 4, 27 and 28) and 1 of 2 shower rooms reviewed for comfortable temperature levels; failed to ensure 4 of 4 hallways had firmly secured handrails to the walls; failed to ensure the emergency call system cord were long enough and accessible for 5 of 31 resident's bathrooms (Rooms 16, 20, 21, 24, and 27); failed to provide covers for florescent light fixtures located above residents' beds for 60 of 61 beds reviewed for safe, comfortable, homelike environment; and failed to secure residents' personal property and medical records. The findings included: 1. During tour of the facility conducted on 12/16/24 at 10:34 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] and 28, it was observed that after running the hot water in the bathroom for 2 minutes, it was not hot to the touch. An interview was conducted on 12/16/24 at 10:38 AM with both residents residing in room [ROOM NUMBER] who stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the regular diet menus, affecting 53 of 55 residents receiving a regular diet. The findings included: Review of the facility's menu, titled, Pine Trail Menu F/W 24/25 Week at a Glance for Regular/Regular Week 1, listed Monday (Day 2) lunch as open face hot turkey sandwich, poultry gravy, garlic mashed potatoes, California blend vegetables, pineapple tidbits, bread for open-face sandwich, coffee/tea, and condiments; and listed Wednesday (Day 3) lunch as beef cubed steak with onion gravy, scalloped potatoes, buttered carrots, chocolate chip cookie, dinner roll, margarine, coffee/tea and condiments. Review of the facility menu, titled, 7 Day Hot Weather/Cold Food Menu Week 1, listed Day 2 lunch as egg salad sandwich, marinated beet and onion salad, fruit mix, sandwich bread, coffee/tea, and condiments; and listed Day 4 lunch as tuna salad sandwich, three bean salad, chilled pears, sandwich bread, coffee/tea and condiments. On 12/16/24 (Monday) at 11:20 AM, the facility served sliced turkey on bread with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in sanitary manner with potential to affect 53 of 55 residents. The findings included: During the initial kitchen tour conducted on 12/16/24 at 9:10 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the following was observed: a. Small refrigerator with open cheese in zip lock type plastic bag was not closed. b. Baking potatoes in a cardboard box under prep counter across from 2 compartment sink was wet and upon closer observation the potatoes in the bottom of the box were wet. c. Divided plates were stored right side up on shelf under prep table. Photographic Evidence Obtained. d. Two (2) red buckets with water and rag in each bucket. e. Unlabeled white granular substance in clear container with lid in beverage serving area. Photographic Evidence Obtained. f. Bottom shelf of beverage serving area covered with tin foil, pulled back to reveal rusty surface. g. Ice machine with missing panels on both sides, exposing corroded material and rust. h. Ice scoop in blue plastic holder on wall with large…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review, the Administrator failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled use of its resources effectively and efficiently which affected all 55 residents in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: 1. An interview was conducted with the Administrator / Risk Manager on 12/20/24 at 12:30 PM. The Administrator was apprised of the concerns of the survey team relating to Administration, as follows: a) Four Licensed Practical Nurses administering (IV) intravenous medications without IV certification. Refer to F694 for details. b) Discussed the resident who had an unwitnessed fall with fracture and who was not able to verbalize how it happened. There was no immediate or 5 day report done and the fall investigation did not determine how the fall occurred or what interventions were in/or not in place at the time of the fall. Refer to F689 for details. c) The Administrator was not aware the facility had a pest control issue and had not had a pest technician visit since 12/02/24 when the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Activities (QAPI/QAA) failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area as evidenced by repeated deficient practices for F803, Menus Meet Resident Nds/Prep in Adv/Followed; F812, Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve Sanitary; and F925, Maintains Effective Pest Control Program. These repeated deficient practices have the potential to affect all 55 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed the facility was cited F803 - Food and Nutrition Services related to menus, F812 - Food and Nutrition Services related to kitchen sanitation issues, and F925 - Physical Environment related pest control, during the Recertification and Relicensure survey with an exit date of 09/28/23. Review of the QAPI program with the Administraor revealed the lack of an effective corrective action plan for the above defeciencies.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operating conditions for 2 of 2 ovens, 1 of 1 freezer and 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerator. The findings included: During the kitchen tour conducted on 12/16/24 at 9:10 AM, an observation was made of 2 broken ovens, labeled with signs saying 'broken'. An interview was conducted on 12/17/24 at 1:20 PM with the Administrator and the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) who stated there are 2 ovens in the kitchen and both are broken. When the CDM was asked if there is any equipment in the kitchen including the refrigerator and freezer, that has issues, the CDM stated that she felt there might be some issues with the walk-in freezer and the walk-in refrigerator since the initial tour of the kitchen with surveyor on 12/16/24. The administrator stated she had only discovered today that the walk-in freezer and walk-in refrigerator was not keeping food at appropriate temperatures and had contacted a vendor to come on 12/17/24 to repair the freezer, but they were unable to repair walk-in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of exterminator service inspection reports, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by observed insects in all stages of life in 1 of 4 hallways ([NAME]), documentation of inconsistent extermination during the past five months, and voiced resident confirmation during interviews. The findings included: During a resident observation on 12/16/24 at 10:36 AM, roach activity was seen in Resident #7's room. Multiple dead roaches and a roach egg were noted behind the resident's bed. Upon further observation, 2 live roaches were seen crawling underneath the resident's bed and wheelchair. Photographic Evidence Obtained. During an interview on 12/16/24 at 11:07 AM, when asked if she had seen any insects in her room, Resident #22 voiced she had seen roaches in her room. She stated, I don't like them. During an interview on 12/16/24 at 11:14 AM, when asked if they had ever seen any bugs in their room, Resident #49 stated he had seen roaches…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity with dining for 2 of 55 sampled residents reviewed for dining, Residents #1 and #14, as eced by standing to feed the resident, assisting one resident later than the roommate and calling the reisdent a feeder. The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Major Depressive Disorder, and Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Bilateral Early Dry Stage. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 dated 11/29/24 documented in Section C, a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 12/17/24 at 8:40 AM, an observation was made of Staff L, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who was standing over Resident #1 feeding the resident oatmeal. An interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' accommodation of needs with sufficient staffing to ensure care and services were provided that assured residents maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as required by the residents' diagnoses or medical condition for 2 of 25 sampled residents, Residents #48 and #52. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's, Leave of Absence Sign-Out/Sign-In Release of Responsibility, sheet revealed the following: The undersigned, resident or responsible party on behalf of the named Resident, desires to temporarily leave Pine Trail. By signing below, I understand and agree that Pine Trail shall not be liable for any injuries that occur or be subjected to any demand or any claim for injuries or damages, whatsoever that result from any event occurring outside or off of the premises of Pine Trail. Record review for Resident #48 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an adverse event for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a fall with fracture, Resident #32. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Unspecified Intracapsular Fracture of left femur, Hypertension, and Major Depression. The documented Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, on the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], was 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of a fall investigation and nursing progress note for 09/23/24 at 6:00 AM documented the resident was found on the floor next to his bed. He was observed laying on his left side. He was unable to give a description of what happened and was showing signs and symptoms of pain to the left hip. He was transferred into bed. The Physician and family were notified and the Physician ordered an x-ray to the left hip.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,800 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $5,346 — penalty dated 2024-12-20
• $11,454 — penalty dated 2024-12-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELIYAHU MIRLIS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $87K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL