Gardens Nursing And Rehab Center
190 NE 191st Street, Miami, FL 33161 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (305) 651-9690 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $264,517 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-01)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.6% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.8% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.9% | 14.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.3% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 37.1% | 8.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 9.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.4% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 2.13 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.70 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 85.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.3–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 85.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 76.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 73.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.7%CMS range 3.1–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews; the facility's Administrator failed to follow up on reported rodent sightings in a timely manner and address them immediately, failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist who is responsible for the facility's Infection, Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. The facility's administrative staff failed to ensure that their policies for pest control services were followed, coordinate with other department heads, failed to contact the appropriate local agencies regarding the rodent infestation. The facility's failure to immediately implement an effective pest control program to eradicate and contain the rodents identified in residents' areas had the potential to spread diseases to residents and potentially affect 111 residents residing in this 120 bed facility. Rats and mice are known to carry many diseases. These diseases can spread to people directly, through handling of rodents; contact with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, the Administrator failed to follow up on reported rodent sightings in a timely manner and address them immediately, the administrative staff failed to follow infection preventions and control techniques and CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines for How to Control Wild Rodent Infestations, the facility's administration staff failed to ensure that their policies for pest control services were followed, coordinate with other department heads; failed to contact the appropriate local agencies regarding the rodent infestation. The facility's failure to immediately implement an effective pest control program to eradicate and contain the rodents. The facility's failure to properly inspect, clean and remove food sources identified in 2 of 17 Residents' rooms (Resident #9 and Resident #36). Rats and mice are known to carry many diseases. This can cause a severe life-threatening disease, Mpox (virus that affects rodents, and causes a painful rash, enlarged lymph…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility's administrative staff failed to implement, maintain, and measure an effective pest control program to eradicate and contain rodent infestation. Facility administrative staff was unable to address rodent sightings in a timely manner. The facility's administrative staff failed to follow their own policy for pest control and educate staff members appropriately. These diseases can spread to people directly through the handling of rodents; contact with rodent feces (poop), urine, or saliva (such as through breathing in air or eating food that is contaminated with rodent waste); or rodent bites. This had the potential to affect 111 residents residing in this 120-bed capacity facilities. The system failure to ensure pest control/infection control and prevention interventions and services were effective and implemented resulted in the likelihood for serious injury and/or death. This failure resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation,and interviews, the facility failed to prevent the neglect of one (Resident #1) out of six residents sampled documented for elopement risk. The facility's failure in ensuring an adequate alert monitoring system was in place and staff's negligence in ensuring supervision and failure in implementing measure to prevent the elopement of Resident #1 who was care planned as an elopement risk. Resident #1's exited the facility undetected on 07/17/2024 through the facility's laundry room door that was not latched by staff. Resident #1 who was last seen between 7:00 PM and 7:30 PM was located at approximately 2:30 AM by local law enforcement at the county dump site one and a half miles (1.5) from the facility). The facility is a three-story building with residents rooms on the second and third floor; located in an area that has high traffic volume, busy intersections and is in a residential area. The county dump site (1.5 miles from the facility) has 2-way traffic, with a 40 miles per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to follow the doctor's orders for tube feeding administration, complete a nutritional assessment, and identify a severe weight loss for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #210). The findings included: Resident #210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Seizures, Dementia, Hypertension, and Protein Calorie Malnutrition. Hospital records dated 08/07/24 (8 days before his admission to the facility) showed the following: Resident #210 presented to the hospital with lethargy, lack of appetite, poor intake of meals, and Altered Mental Status. Resident #210 ' s daughter agreed to move forward with a Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. The Speech Language Pathologist deemed inappropriate for food by mouth trials and at high risk for aspiration. Upon physical exam, Resident #210 ' s weight was 132 pounds. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #210 has severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews it was determined that the facility did not ensure the resident call system functioned properly, nor did it maintain a reliable communication system for residents to request staff assistance from their rooms (including bathrooms) to a centralized staff work area on one (third) of the three floors where residents resided. Four residents (Resident #46, Resident #12, Resident #16, and Resident #52) out of the fifty-three residing on the third floor reported that the call system was not working. The findings included: During an observation conducted on 03/23/2026 at 9:10 AM, Resident # 16 reported the call light has not worked for over a month and maintenance staff reported it was an issue with the electrical outlets. Record review for Resident # 16 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis that include Encephalopathy; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with others Specified Complication. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility did not adequately protect one of two sampled residents from sexual abuse. According to a Federal report, on 03/17/2026, vulnerable Resident #32 was sexually assaulted by Resident # 6, who has a documented history of sexually inappropriate conduct toward staff and other residents. At the time of the survey, 112 residents resided in the facility. The findings included:On 03/23/2026 at 9:05 AM Resident # 32 was observed in her room sitting on the side of the bed and stated, I want bathroom. The call system did not work, so the surveyor notified a staff member that the resident needed help.Record review of a Federal Report revealed on 03/17/2026 at 6:07 PM Resident #32 was observed by facility staff in bed with Resident #6 on top of Resident #32. At that time Resident # 32 was not wearing a brief. Further review of report revealed Resident # 32 was sent out to the hospital for a Rape Kit and Sexual Transmitted Disease test to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed maintain an environment free from accidents and hazards in potentially hazardous or unsafe areas on all three floors where residents resided. Observations included unlocked doors leading to soiled utility and biohazard rooms, laundry chutes, janitor closets, and the clean utility room containing stored oxygen tanks, which posed significant risks to residents' safety. At the time of the survey, 112 residents lived in the facility. The findings include.Observations on 03/23/2026, at 12:06 PM and on 03/24/2026, at 9:32 AM revealed the laundry chute on the third floor was unlocked. (Photographic evidence) Observation on 03/23/2026, at 12:19 PM revealed the third-floor janitors' closet door was unlocked. (Photographic evidence) Observations on 03/23/2026, at 12:27 PM and on 03/24/2026 at 9:14 AM the door third-floor clean utility room that stored the oxygen tanks was unlocked. (Photographic evidence) Observations on 03/23/2026, at 12:32 PM and on 03/24/2026 at 9:14 AM revealed the third-floor soiled utility room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility did not protect residents' information on one of four medication carts (West side cart) and one of two vital signs machines. Staff left an unattended computer screen on the west side medication cart and a vital signs machine open and unattended on the second floor, both displaying residents' information. At the time of the survey, 112 residents lived in the facility. The findings included: Observation on 03/23/2026 at 9:49 AM on the third floor revealed the computer screen was left open on the unattended west side medication cart displaying residents' information. (photo evidence).On 03/23/2026 at 10:00 AM Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) was asked about the unattended west side cart's open computer screen with residents' information displayed. Staff D, RN stated: I am supposed to close the computer screen by hitting the icon to protect residents' information. The reason I left it open was because I was helping a resident.During an interview on 03/23/2026 at 10:45 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated: Staff are to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to honor one (Resident # 92) of two sampled residents' rights to be free from restraints. On two separate occasions, it was noted that the left side of Resident # 92's bed was positioned against the wall, which restricted Resident # 92's ability to exit the bed safely. At the time of the survey 112 residents were residing in the facilityThe findings include:Observation on 03/23/2026 at 9:58 AM revealed Resident # 92 had bilateral side rails up and the left side of the bed against wall. Photo evidence provided. Observation on 03/25/2026 at 9:20 AM revealed Resident # 92 had bilateral side rails up and the left side of the bed was positioned against wall. Photo evidence provided. Record review of a demographic sheet revealed Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: metabolic encephalopathy and transient alteration of awareness.Record review of the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations records reviewed and interviews it was determined that the facility did not accurately complete Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) forms for two out of three sampled residents diagnosed with a Serious Mental Illness (SMI). Resident # 5's diagnosis of Schizophrenia was omitted on the Level I PASRR form despite being admitted to the facility with this diagnosis. 2. The Level I PASRR for Resident # 6 did not include documentation of exhibited behaviors posing potential risks to others. At the time of the survey, there were 112 residents residing in the facility. The findings included: Resident # 5On 03/23/2026 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #5 lying in bed with eyes closed.On 03/23/2026 at 11:45 AM, Resident #5 was observed walking in the hallway with a walker the surveyor greeted the resident, but Resident #5 did not respond.Record review of Resident #5's clinical records revealed an admission date of 5/9/2025 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnosis that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility did not uphold the residents' right to adequate and appropriate health care for one (Resident #32) out of two sampled residents who returned to the facility after hospitalization with medication orders to continue post-discharge. Resident # 32 was transferred to the hospital after being sexually assaulted in the facility. The hospital's medical provider ordered and instructed the continuation of prophylactic medications for Resident # 32 upon discharge; however, the facility failed to implement this order. This omission increased Resident # 32's risk of an untreated sexually transmitted infection. At the time of the survey, 112 residents resided in the facility. The findings include: Record review of a Federal Report revealed on 03/17/2026 at 6:07 PM Resident # 32 was observed by facility staff in bed with Resident #6 on top of Resident # 32. At that time Resident # 32 was not wearing a brief. Further review of report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to store medications and biologics properly for one (Resident #84) out of seven sampled residents. Resident # 84 had an over-the-counter topical medication used to relieve oral pain a medicated lotion at bedside. There were 112 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:Observation on 03/23/2026 at 10:03 AM in Resident # 84's room revealed a container of [brand] over-the-counter topical medication used to temporarily relieve oral pain on the side table and a medicated lotion on the nightstand. (photo evidence). On 03/23/2026 at 10:19 AM Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) was made aware of the identified concern and stated: Residents cannot have medications at the bedside without a physician's order. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/23/2026 at 10:46 AM it was revealed that Resident #84 did not have physician's order to keep over-the-counter topical medication used to temporarily relieve oral pain or medicated lotions at the bedside. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to demonstrate effective plans of action were implemented to correctly identify quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F689 Free of Accident Hazards and Supervision and Devices, F761 Label and Store Drugs and Biologicals, F880 Infection Prevention and Control and F919 Resident Call System. These repeated deficiencies had the potential to affect 112 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated 09/13/2024, F689 Free of Accident Hazards and Supervision and Devices was cited related to the facility failed to ensure the facility remained free from accident hazards as evidenced by not providing direct supervision for 1 of 23 residents who smoke and excess lint in 1 of 2 dryers in the laundry room. F761 Label and Store Drugs and Biologicals was cited related to unsecured medications at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility did not adhere to proper infection prevention and control protocols. Specifically, Staff C, a Wound Care Registered Nurse (RN), failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care procedures. At the time of the survey, there were 112 residents living in the facility. The findings include:Observation on 03/25/2026 at 10:33 AM of wound care performed by Staff C, Wound Care Registered Nurse (RN) for Resident # 62's stage 4 sacral wound; Staff C, Wound Care RN gathered required supplies to treat the resident's wound according to physician orders dated 03/20/2026 to cleanse sacral wound with saline, pat dry. Apply Honey impregnated. Cover with border dressing daily and as needed (PRN) in the morning for Wound Care and as needed for Wound Care . Staff C, Wound Care RN performed hand hygiene and gown and gloves were applied. The procedure was explained to the resident, and the old dressing dated 03/25/2026 was removed. Staff C, Wound Care RN removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations records reviewed and interviews the facility failed to ensure a safe bathing environment for one resident (Resident #100) out of two sampled. Resident #100 sustained a cut on the bottom of his right foot in the shower from a protruding metal screw, which secured the metal grate drain cover. This deficient practice increased Resident #100's risk for serious chronic wound complications such as an infection. The findings included: During the Residents' Council meeting held on 03/25/2026 at 1:45 PM Resident #100 reported he sustained a cut on his foot in the shower.On 03/25/26 at 3:25 PM Resident #100 was observed in his room sitting in a chair the resident showed the surveyor an undated bandage on the bottom of his right foot and reported the cut was treated by a Staff I Registered Nurse (RN) on 03/24/2026. The resident removed the bandage and a cut measuring approximately 1.5 inches long with scant yellow drainage was noted.On 03/25/26 at 3:27 PM inspection of Resident #100's shared bathroom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food under sanitary condition in two out of two snack/nourishment refrigerator on the resident's unit. as evidenced by residents' foods brought to the facility by visitors and family were observed unlabeled and not appropriately dated. This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents receiving food brought in from outside sources. The findings include.Observation on 06/25/2025 at 3:15 PM of the facility's Nourishment Pantries refrigerators that stores resident's food that is brought into the facility by visitors, family and other outside sources revealed the refrigerator on the second floor had 17 unlabeled grocery type bags with food items and three plastic containers in plastic bags with food items dated 05/29/2025 and had no names. The third-floor refrigerator also had several unlabeled undated plastic bags with food items. Interview on 06/25/2025 at 3: 25 PM Interview with Staff J, Registered Nurse revealed (RN) stated: all these foods belong to the residents. items in the refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews facility failed to notify one (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents' representative of a change in condition. As evidenced by Resident #1 with a clinical diagnosis of Disorganized Schizophrenia (a mental condition that cause an individual to have trouble organizing their thoughts, which can lead to behaviors that seem random) left the facility Against Medical Advise (AMA) and the responsible party was not notified.The findings included:Record review of a demographic sheet revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Schizophrenia and Psychosis, responsible party listed: [] Advocacy Group and discharged on 5/5/2025.Record review of an admission/discharge/transfer list revealed Resident#1 was listed as discharged Against Medical Advice on 5/5/25.Record review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) reference dated 3/24/2025 revealed Resident#1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 out of 15; indicated no cognitive impairment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #1 out of three (Resident #1) safely and appropriately discharged to a safe location where ongoing clinical care could be provided, as evidence by on 05/05/2025 Resident #1 a vulnerable resident with clinical diagnoses of Disorganized Schizophrenia (a mental condition that cause an individual to have trouble organizing their thoughts, which can lead to behaviors that seem random) insisted on leaving the facility was presented with an Against Medical Advise (AMA) form which he refused to sign. The facility did not obtain a valid address for Resident #1's next place of residence and did not inform the resident's advocate/representative about the AMA discharge. At the time of this survey Resident #1's location is unknown. The findings include: Observational tour of the facility's exterior revealed the facility is in a residential area with high volume of traffic and cross streets; the facility is not gated at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor their policy for Foods brought in by family/visitors for one (Resident #13) out of three sampled residents as evidenced by the facility's staff refuse to warm Resident #13's food brought in by family. The findings included: During observation on 06/25/25 at 12:55 PM Resident #13 was observed seated in her wheelchair at the bedside. Resident #13 revealed she had a recent disagreement with the dietary manager about her food that had been brought in by her brother being too burnt when staff warmed it up in the kitchen .As a result the Dietary Manager is unwilling to warm her food in the kitchen. The resident further explained the microwaves were removed and residents must warm up outside food in the kitchen. Interview on 06/25/25 at 02:25 PM, the Dietary Manager reported there is currently no microwave on each floor, as the previous ones were removed due to repeated damage and have not been replaced. Per facility policy, staff are not permitted to reheat outside food brought in by residents or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a discharge care plan for one (Resident # 1) out of three resident whose discharge care plans were reviewed. There were 106 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 1's clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 03/08/2025. Clinical diagnoses include Displaced Tri malleolar Fracture of Right Lower Leg, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing, Encounter for Other Orthopedic Aftercare. Record review of orders dated 03/07/2025 indicated the resident was to be discharged home with family on 08/08/2025. Review of the admission Minimum Date Set (MDS) Section C for Cognitive Patterns dated 02/11/2025 revealed the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was 07 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The section for Functional Abilities dated 02/11/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure indwelling catheters are secure for two (Residents #7, and Resident #8) out of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. As evidenced by Resident #7's was observed in the hallway carry his catheter bag in his hand and at times placing it on the floor. Resident # 8 was observed with the catheter's drainage bag on his lap and the tubing on the wheelchair's wheels. These deficient practices increases the risk for catheter related urological trauma if the indwelling urinary catheter is unintentionally pulled resulting in dislodgement. The findings include: Resident #7 On 03/27/2025 at 10:05 AM, Resident#7 was observed in the hallway with his indwelling catheter resting on his lap. At the time of the observation, there was no privacy bag in use to cover the catheter. (Photographic evidence) On 03/27/2025 at 11:28 AM, Resident#7's indwelling catheter was observed on the floor, the catheter was not properly secured or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations records reviewed and interviews; the facility failed to ensure Drug Regimen Reviews were completed for one (Resident # 13) out of three residents reviewed as evidenced by Resident #13 who was admitted to the facility has been receiving a combination of antidepressant, blood pressure medication, muscle relaxer, and atypical antipsychotic medication that has the potential to cause serious interactions and side effects has not received the Drug Regimen Review within the required time frame. The findings include. On 03/25/2025 at 10:15 AM Resident # 13 was observed smoking at the designated smoking patio located on the second floor interacting with staff. On 03/26/2025 at 11:19 AM Resident #13 was observed in the elevator going up to the third floor. It was noted that another resident made fat shaming remarks directed at Resident #13. Who did not respond and held her head down. On 3/27/2025 at 9:35 AM Resident # 13 was observed on the smoking patio and interacted with staff. On 3/27/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for potentially 107 facility residents. the findings included: 1) During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 08/26/24 at 8:50 AM, the following were noted: (a) The exteriors of 2 kitchen utility carts were noted to be heavily soiled, stained, and areas of peeling paint. * Photo Evidence Obtained (b) Large areas of the kitchen floor and walls were cracked stained, and in disrepair. * Photo Evidence Obtained (c) The floor area of the dry/canned food storage area was heavily soiled, stained, and areas of rust. * Photo Evidence Obtained (d) Staff clothing and purses (2) were noted to be stored directly onto clean food storage shelving. * Photo Evidence Obtained (e) A chemical test of 3 of 3 cleaning cloth buckets noted extremely high concentration of Quaternary Chemical * Photo Evidence Obtained (f) The entry door of the walk-in refrigerator was noted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-30 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility designated Infection preventionist who is responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. The findings included: Review of the facility's job description titled, Infection Preventionist, included the following: The primary purpose of your job position is to plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of our Infection Control and Prevention Program in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our center and as may be directed by the Medical Director or Director of Nursing to ensure that the center provides a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent and control the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Experience: Certification in Infection Control as specified by Appendix PP at 880 is required or must obtain within the first 90 days of employment. Record review of the infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provided 6 non-sampled resident's and 1 of 1 (Resident #62) residents reasonable access to the use of a phone and in a place in the facility where calls can be made without being overheard. The findings included: During the screening of residents on the second floor on 08/26/24 at 10:00 AM it was noted that 6 residents who resided on the second floor were using the facility telephone located at the nurses station desk. Further observation noted these residents just walking up to the phone and dialing without any staff intervention to use a phone in a private area. The resident's conversations could be overheard by numerous staff and residents located within the nurses station area. Random observations conducted on 08/8//27/24 noted residents again utilizing the facility nurses station phone, however in addition it was noted that outside calls were being routed into the nurses station and residents were brought to the nurses station to voice aloud in a non -private setting. On 08/28/24 at 12:30 PM it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior that included observation of 2 of 2 residential room areas (second floor and third floor), 1 of 2 dining room (second floor) areas, 1 of I elevators, and 4 of 4 wheelchairs Resident's #7, #9, #17, and #54. The findings included: During the resident screening performed by the surveyors on 08/26/24 to 08/27/24 and the Environment Tour conducted with the Administrator and Corporate Maintenance Director on 08/28/24 at 2:00 PM and on 08/29/24 at 1:00 PM, the following were noted: The Elevator's interior floors and walls were noted to be heavily soiled and stained. Exposed sharp piece of plastic noted near the handrails. The entry/exit door to the elevator was noted to be heavily soiled and stained. The metal handrail to the side of the elevator entry/exit was heavily worn down to the bare metal surface. Observation on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), the observation period (also known as the Look-back period) is the time period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the MDS for 3 of 3 residents sampled for resident assessment (Residents #48, #100, and #59). The findings included: 1) Resident #48 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part: Cardiac Arrythmia Unspecified, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery Without Angina Pectoris, Epilepsy, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Dementia. Review of the MDS for Resident #48 dated 07/13/24 documented in a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Documented in Section N under High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan for smoking was revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 1 residents sampled for smoking (Resident #59). The findings included: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Care Plan - Comprehensive with an effective date of 09/01/22 included in part the following: An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change. Record review for Resident #59 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Other Lack of Coordination, Muscle Weakness, Need for Assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure minimum nursing staff was provide daily related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population affecting resident census of 111 out of 120 bed facility . 1) Review of the facility's State Minimum Nursing Staffing from 06/23/24 to 08/24/24 revealed on 06/30/24 the daily average for nursing (Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical Nurses) was 0.9899 (below the minimum 1.0). On 08/30/24 at 3:00 PM the administrator provided updated Minimum Nurse Staffing forms. During an interview conducted 08/27/24 at 11:00 AM with the Administrator who stated she is the person responsible for completing the Nurse Staffing Calculations. When asked what the minimum should be, she said the daily average total Nursing hours should be 1.0, the daily average CNA 2.0 , and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to post Nurse Staffing Data daily with current date and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The findings included: On 08/26/24 from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM during an initial tour of the facility, an observation was made on the second floor. The nurse staffing data posted was dated 08/23/24 (Photographic Evidence Provided). There was no other nurse staffing data posted in the facility. During an interview conducted on 08/26/24 at 11:25 AM with Staff CC Registered Nurse. When asked if there is nursing staffing data posting in the facility with the number of all staff and all nurses, she said no, and she only knows about her floor (3rd), and they just have the white board that they write the assignments for this floor.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based onrecord reviews and the facility failed to administer medications in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents sampled for medication administration (Resident #70) and failed to ensure medications administered as ordered for 1 of 6 residents sampled for medication reconciliation (Resident #52) and failed to ensure drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for 4 of 6 residents sampled for medication reconciliation (Residents #52, #54, #16, #42). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration Policy - General with an effective date of 08/07/23 included in part the following: Procedure: 3.7 Verify that the medication name and dose are correct when compared to the medication order on the medication administration record. 4. Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure behaviors were adequately monitored for residents on psychotropic medications for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #76, Resident #306, Resident #307, and Resident #56). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Behavior Monitoring, dated 09/01/23, included the following: Residents who have not used psychotropic medications are not given these medications unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed, documented in the clinical record and per physician order. Procedure: 1.Resident(s) receiving psychotropic medication should have specific condition documented indications in the medical record. 4. Monitor behavior and side effects every shift utilizing the electronic Behavior Monitoring Flow Record. 11. Care plan to include person centered goals and non-pharmaceutical interventions. Update Care Plan as indicated. 1) Record review for Resident #76…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure medications were secured at bedside for 1 of 43 sampled residents (Resident #28), failed to secure medications in 1 of 1 clean linen closet located on 2nd floor, and failed to secure wound treatment cart for 2 of 2 wound treatment carts. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage with an effective date 12/08/23 included in part: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Procedure: 4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 7. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide 107 of 111 facility residents with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meet dietary needs and taking into consideration of food preferences of the residents. The findings included: 1) During the observation of the Breakfast meal of 08/28/24 at 7:30 AM, it was noted that all resident meal trays include a 4 ounce serving of a light colored pink liquid. A review of numerous resident meal tray tickets were noted to have documentation of a preference of a Orange Juice serving. A review of the approved menu for the breakfast meal of 08/28/24 noted documentation of a 6 ounce portion of Vitamin C Juice to be served. On 08/28/24 at 9:30 AM the surveyor went into the main kitchen to investigate the juice that was served for the 08/28/24 breakfast meal. During an interview with the Diet Aide's (Staff C & D) a container of Tropical Punch (63 ounce powder) was given to the surveyor. The staff stated that 6-7 scoops of the powder is mixed with approximately 1 gallon of water,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare in advance and follow the approved menu menu for 107 of the facility's 111 residents. The findings included; 1) During the review of the approved menu for the lunch meal on 08/26/24, the following were noted to be served to Regular, Mechanical Soft, Pureed, and No Concentrated Sweets Diets: * Homemade Chili (6 ounce portion = 2 ounce protein) * Watermelon Cubes (#8 scoop = 1/2 cup) * Cornbread (1 piece) Observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 08/26/24 at 11:30 AM noted the following were being serve to the facility residents: * Homemade Chill - (#10 scoop - 2 ounce portion was being served) * Watermelon Cubes (no water melon available - canned pineapple substituted) * Cornbread ( pureed regular bread served to the pureed diets) Interview with the facility cook ( Staff A) at the time of observation; Staff A noted to state that she did not review the approved menu for the lunch meal of 08/26/24 and thought that a 2 ounce portion be served and was also not aware that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare foods by the use of standardized recipes to ensure nutritive value, flavor, appearance, and food that is attractive and appetizing for 107 of the facility's 111 residents. The findings included: During the review of the approved menu for the lunch meal on 08/27/24 noted documentation for the entree, Turkey Burger Patty Melt to be served as the entree for Regular, Mechanical Altered (Mechanical Soft and Pureed), and No Concentrated Sweets Diets. A review of the resident's Diet Census for 08/26/24 noted 107 of there facility's 111 residents were to receive Regular, Mechanical Altered, and No Concentrated Sweets Diets. At the request of the surveyor a copy of the facility's standardized recipe for Turkey Burger Patty Melt was requested from the Dietary Manager (CDM). A review of the standardized recipe noted the following: Turkey Burger Patty Melt (recipe) Ingredients: Turkey Burgers Margarine Sautéed Onions Swiss Cheese Bread Directions: 1) Arrange burgers on sheet pan and cook…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F584 Safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment, F755 Pharmacy Srvcs/Procedures/pharmacist/records, F867 Qapi/qaa Improvement Activities, and F925 Maintains Effective Pest Control Program. These deficiencies have the potential to affect 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated 05/19/2023, F755 Pharmacy Srvcs/Procedures/pharmacist/records, F867 Qapi/qaa Improvement Activities, and F925 Maintains Effective Pest Control Program and a complaint survey with exit date 10/03/2023 F584 Safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment were cited. Review of the Policy and procedures revealed; The Center organization has a comprehensive, date-drive Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program that focuses on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have functioning communication system to call for staff assistance from their room (including bathroom) to a centralized staff work area for 5 of 43 residents reviewed for call lights (Resident #6, Resident #9, Resident #19, Resident #83, and Resident #88). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Lights, dated 09/01/23, included the following: The purpose of this policy is ensuring residents' requests and needs are responded to. Procedure: 2. Answer the resident's call as soon as possible. 5. Report malfunctioning call lights to Maintenance, ED, and/or DON promptly. 6. Offer stationary bells and/or round frequently on residents if the call light system is malfunctioning. 1)Record review for Resident #6 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Multiple Sclerosis; Generalized Anxiety Disorder; Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call lights were within reach for 4 of 43 sampled residents (Resident #88, Resident #11, Resident #15 and Resident #306). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Call Lights dated 09/01/23 showed that the purpose of this policy is ensuring residents' request and needs are responded to. The call light should be within reach of the resident. 1. A chart review revealed that Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral infarction and Hyperlipidemia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #88 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which was a slight cognitive impairment. In a phone interview conducted on 08/25/24 at 11:33 AM with Resident #88's family stated that Resident #88 fell in the facility last week trying to go to the bathroom on his own with no assistance. The call light was not within reach and Resident #88…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to initiate and resolve grievances for 4 of 43 residents reviewed for grievances (Resident #6, Resident #9, Resident #19, and Resident #206). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Complaint/Grievance, dated 09/07/23, included the following: The Center will support each resident's right to voice a complaint/grievance without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The center will make prompt efforts to resolve the complaint/grievance and inform the resident of progress towards resolution. The center will inform residents of the right to file a grievance orally and in writing, the right to obtain a written decision regarding the grievance. Procedure: 1. An employee receiving a complaint/grievance from a resident, family member and/or visitor will initiate a Complaint/Grievance Form. Complaint/Grievance forms will be available 24 hours per days 7 days a week in an unsecured common area. 2. Original grievance forms are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a Comprehensive Care Plan for antipsychotic medications for 3 of 43 sampled residents (Resident #56, Resident #306, and Resident #94) and a Comprehensive Care Plan for an Advance Directive for 1 of 43 sampled residents (Resident #100). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan-Comprehensive, dated 09/01/2022, revealed an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Identifying problem areas and their causes and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident are developed through an interdisciplinary process. The resident's comprehensive care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the resident's comprehensive assessment (MDS). Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good nutrition for 1 (Resident #45) of 6 sampled residents that are unable to eat without staff assistance. The findings included: During an observation of Resident #45 on 08/28/24 at 12:20 PM, it was noted that the resident's lunch tray had been placed on the over-bed table directly in front and in reach of the resident. It was also noted that a large container of non -thickened water with drinking straw was also placed in reach of the resident. It was noted that the resident was scooping large portions of pureed foods with bare hands above her head and dropping the pureed foods into her mouth. It was noted that the resident started coughing and regurgitation the pureed foods from her mouth onto her chest. The surveyor immediately requested the nurse to come to Resident #45's room. The Director of Nursing (DON) was noted to come to the room and observed the surveyors findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure it was free from accident/hazard as evidenced by not providing direct supervision for 1 of 23 residents who smoke (Resident #59), paper trash observed in 1 of 1 red smolder cigarette butt bin on the smoking patio and excess lint in 1 of 2 dryers in the laundry room. The findings included: 1) On 08/28/24 at 4:08 PM an observation was made of several residents on the smoking patio, with Staff NN, a Certified Nursing Assistant who was present on the inside of the facility watching residents on the smoking patio through the window. Visibility of entire smoking patio and all residents smoking was not visible from inside the facility through the window. Resident # 59 was smoking on the smoking patio at the far end away from the glass door and window and not visible from the inside of the facility. Record review for Resident #59 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part: Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a performance review of every Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was completed at least every 12 months. The findings included: On 08/27/24 at 9:00 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked for the performance review for the following Certified Nursing Aides: Staff II Certified Nursing Assistant with hire date of 11/04/20 Staff JJ Certified Nursing Assistant with hire date of 11/09/21 Staff KK Certified Nursing Assistant with hire date of 01/19/22 Staff LL Certified Nursing Assistant with hire date of 02/22/24 Staff MM Certified Nursing Assistant with hire date of 08/23/23 During an interview conducted on 08/29/24 at 9:50 AM with the DON who stated they are not able to provide any performance review evaluations for the 5 CNAs that was requested due to transition of ownership this week. When asked if he could try to request the information requested from the previous owner, he said Human Resources informed him it is not available to be requested.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for high-risk medications for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #9). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration Policy-General, dated 08/07/23, included the following: Procedure: 3. Dose Preparation: take all measures required by Facility policy and Applicable Law, including, but not limited to the following: 3.7 Verify that the medication name and dose are correct when compared to the medication order on the medication administration record. Record review for Resident #9 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Hemiplegia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15, which indicated that she was cognitively intact. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food in a form designed to meet individual needs that included; Thickened Liquids for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #45) and Purred Diet for 10 facility residents that included 5 sampled residents (Resident #17, #45, #211, #193, and #301). The findings included: During an observation of Resident #45 on 08/28/24 at 12:20 PM, it was noted that the resident's lunch tray had been placed on the over-bed table directly in front and in reach of the resident. It was also noted that a large container of non -thickened water with drinking straw was also placed in reach of the resident. Further observation of the resident noted to be scooping large portions of pureed foods with bare hands above her head and dropping the pureed foods into her mouth. It was noted that the resident started coughing and regurgitation the pureed foods from her mouth onto her chest. The surveyor immediately requested the nurse to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the diet orders as per Physicians' orders for one of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #84). The findings: In an observation conducted on 08/28/24 at 8:03 AM, Resident #84 was in his room with the breakfast tray. The meal ticket showed no concentrated sweets (NCS), no added salt, and a (NAS) diet with double portions (no fortified meals noted on the meal ticket). The breakfast tray revealed oatmeal, eggs (regular serving), muffin, and a glass of 4-ounce juice. The breakfast meal did not have the double portions and the fortified foods as per doctor's orders. In this observation, Resident #84 told this Surveyor that he wanted more meat and that what they served him this morning was not enough. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes and Iron Deficiency. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that Resident #84 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide special eating equipment (Divided Plate) 5 of (Resident's #16, #30, #34, #42, and #45) sampled residents who need them when consuming meals. The findings included: During the observation of the lunch meal conducted in the second floor dining room on 08/26/24, it was noted that the meal tray ticket for Resident #16 and Resident #19 both documented that a Divided Plate be provided with the meal. Further observation noted that that the no Divided Plate was provided for either resident and further noted that the resident's attempt to eat independently and the use of a Divided Plate would assist the resident with self feeding. On 08/27/24 at 7:30 AM a second observation of the breakfast meal was conducted in the second floor dining room. It was noted again that the meal tray tickets documented a Divided Plate be provided, however the adaptive plate was not included on the resident's meal tray. Following the 08/27/24 observation the surveyor interviewed kitchen staff concerning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation , interview, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The findings included: Observation tour of the outside garbage/refuse area on 08/26/24 at 9:45 AM noted the following: (a) A large body of stagnant water was noted to be located between garbage dumpster and cardboard recycling dumpster. Further observation noted that the area was approximately 10-12 feet wide and approximately 12 inches deep in the center. Further observation noted large areas of stagnant algae in the water along with what appeared to be medical waste that included medication bottles, medication inhaler tubes, disposable gloves, disposable masks, disposable gowns, and other unidentifiable waste. The area also contained numerous large and small piece of garbage and trash. The areas behind the dumpster and the walkway to and around the rear of the building were also noted to be littered with the same type of medical waste and garbage /trash. Also located next to the dumpster's were 4 large tires which were filled with stagnant water and a potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for closed record (Resident #104). The findings included: Record review for Resident #104 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] and left against medical advice (AMA) on 08/07/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #104 dated 07/20/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 indicating a cognitive response. Review of the BIMS Evaluation for Resident #104 dated 08/07/24 documented a BIMS score of 14 indicating a cognitive response. Review of the AMA form for Resident #104 revealed the resident signed the form on 08/07/24. Review of the Nursing notes for Resident #104 from 08/06/24 to 08/07/24 revealed no documentation the family being notified of resident leaving the facility and signing himself out AMA. During an interview conducted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to offer influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations for Resident #72 and to properly document immunization records for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #72, Resident #89, and Resident #210). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Influenza Vaccine, dated 09/25/23, included the following: Residents who have no medical contraindications will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. Procedure: 1. Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents. 4. A resident's refusal of the vaccine shall be documented in the medical record. Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumonia Vaccine, dated 09/07/23, included the following: Procedure: 1. Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0917 — isolatedMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide each resident with individual closet space in the resident room and ensure closets had privacy doors for 5 out of 43 sampled residents (Resident #79, Resident#20, Resident #15, Resident #212 and Resident #90). The findings included: In a tour of the facility conducted on 08/28/24 at 3:00 PM, the following were noted: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] had Resident #79 by the door with a closet that did not have a door for privacy, and his roommate, Resident #81, did not have a closet on his side of the room. In this observation, Resident #79 said that he was sharing his closet with just about everyone on the floor and that his roommate did not have his own closet. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] had Resident #20 by the door, with a closet that did not have a door for privacy, and his roommate Resident #211, who did not have a closet on his side of the room. In this observation, Resident #20 said that his roommate did not have a closet on his side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure handrails are securly affixed to wall on 1 of 3 floors (3rd floor hallway). The findings included: On 08/26/24 from 9:45 AM to 11:00 AM during an initial tour of the facility, the handrails on 3rd floor were found to be loose at the following locations: Next to room [ROOM NUMBER] (Photographic Evidence Obtained). Next to the 3rd floor elevator near nursing station (Photographic Evidence Obtained). Next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview conducted on 08/30/24 at 1:00 PM with the Administrator who was informed of the loose handrails on the 3rd floor, she stated, they had had an issue with the handrails on the 2nd floor and those had been secured to the wall.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for second floor resident rooms. The findings included: Observation on the Second Floor 10/03/2023 from 8:02am to 9:15am revealed: Rooms #221 - Under the sink a container, the toilet paper holder was on the floor, the shower floor was dirty, and on the ceiling a water marks. The cover sheet under air conditioner (AC) unit was collecting the moisture and was wet. Water was running from the shower head on the bathroom floor. room [ROOM NUMBER] - At the entrance there was a dead roach, bathroom walls were in disrepair, the shower was observed to rusty and dirty. In the hallway across from room [ROOM NUMBER] another roach was observed. Room#223 - Under the Air Conditioner unit, there was a blanket to collect the moisture. In the bathroom a live roach was observed and the wall was in disrepair. Room#229 - At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review. The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests as evidenced by live roaches, dead roaches and small black bugs observed in eleven different locations in the facility. The findings included: On 10/3/23 at 8:02 AM to 9:15AM, during an observation of the facility's second floor the following was observed: The second-floor dining room: There were seven residents in total and five were in a wheelchairs. There was a live roach crawling on the wall. room [ROOM NUMBER]: A dead roach was near Bed A. [See photo evidence]. room [ROOM NUMBER]: A live roach was seen crawling in the bathroom. [See photo evidence]. room [ROOM NUMBER]: 2 dead roaches were seen and smashed into the wall. [See photo evidence]. room [ROOM NUMBER]: A dead roach was found in front of Bed B in the room. room [ROOM NUMBER]: One live roach was seen crawling on the wall. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Multiple roaches were found stuck to a glue traps…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dignity during dining for one (Resident #81) out of 28 residents who need assistance with eating. As evidenced by one facility staff member standing while feeding the resident. The findings included: In an observation on 05/16/23 at 12:02 PM. In the dining room, there were 12 residents and 2 staff sitting down while assisting residents to eat lunch. Staff I, a Registered Nurse was seen pulling resident up in the chair. Staff I, fed resident #81 from his regular diet tray, while standing and resident #81 was observed feeding himself at times. On 05/16/23 at 02:35 PM, during an interview with Staff I, Registered Nurse, when asked, How was lunch for resident #81 and the reason for standing while feeding the resident? Staff I stated, The resident was sliding down in the chair. I'm supposed to be sitting when I'm feeding a resident. When asked, The reason for not sitting down? Staff I stated, I'm an active person, I walk around, I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate and appropriate health care, related to restorative therapy services for one (Resident # 7) out of one resident who needs to have splints on both hands. This practice has the potential to increase the risk of negative resident outcomes and to affect all in-house residents residing in the facility who need to wear splint devices. The findings included: Observation of Resident # 7 on 05/16/2023 at 09:03 AM. The resident was observed with both hands contracted and not wearing splints or hand rolls. Observation of Resident # 7 on 05/17/2023 at 10:15 AM. The resident was observed lying in his bed. The resident was not wearing splints or hands rolls in his contracted hands. Observation of Resident # 7 on 05/18/23 at 10:31 AM. The resident was observed lying in his bed. The resident was observed with both hands contracted. The resident was not wearing any splint or devices. The resident was not able to respond to questions asked.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical procedures were followed during medication administration and medication storage observation for two (3) out of four (4) medication carts observed and 3 residents observed for medication administration with 28 opportunities. This affected Residents #22, #32 and #73. There were 81 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The Findings Included: During medication administration observation on 05/17/2023 at 8:30 AM with Registered Nurse (Staff I) on unit two (2) west medication cart, the medication Calcitriol Capsule 0.25 Microgram (MCG)-one (1) capsule by mouth once daily was not available to be given to Resident #73, the medication was last signed out in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) as given on 05/16/2023 at 9AM. Interview on 05/17/2023 at 8:30AM with Registered Nurse, Staff I, when asked about the policy on reordering the medication for resident's Staff I stated, I reordered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Graduate Practical Nurse met the qualifications required for the job title. There were 81 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The Findings Included: On 5/17/23 at 9:06AM, prior to the medication administration observation, the surveyor introduced herself to Graduate Nurse (Staff E) at the medication cart, Staff E stated, her name and title as a graduate nurse. Staff E stated, there is a program here in the facility for graduate nurses. On 05/18/23 at 02:32 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked about Staff E's graduate nurse qualifications, it stated Staff E was hired as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs), I am aware that she has a certificate stating she can sit for the nursing state boards as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). I will find out from Human Resources (HR) when Staff E graduated from nursing school and if she has a Graduate Practical Nurse letter from the State of Florida. On 05/18/23 at 04:00 PM, received from the NHA, Staff E's Authorization to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record Review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plans of action were implemented to correctly identify quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F550 Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights and F688 Increased/Prevent Decrease in Range of Motion/Mobility. This practice has the potential to increase the risk of negative resident outcomes that could affect all 81 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The finding included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit 3/10/2022, Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights was cited related to the facility failed to treat 1 out of 24 sampled residents in a dignified manner. Moreover, Increase/Prevent Decrease in ROM/Mobility was cited related to the facility failed to provide adequate care and treatment for one resident with a contracture as evidenced by the facility's failure to apply elbow extension and splint devices as per physician's order. During record review of the quarterly meeting sign-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$264,517 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $252,723 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
- $5,897 — penalty dated 2023-10-03
- $5,897 — penalty dated 2023-10-03
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-01 for 75 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ELIYAHU MIRLIS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 190 NE 191ST ST MIAMI HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2023 |
| MIRLIS, ELIYAHU | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 99% | since 09/01/2023 |
| COLMAN, RUBEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| CROSS, HALEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $189K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105765. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.