Ridgeland Nursing Center Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 84.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.92 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for elopement risk (Resident (R)1), a cognitively impaired resident with dementia and an inactive wander guard in place. This failure allowed R1 to exit the facility unsupervised through an unlocked front entrance on 05/22/26. On 06/02/26 at 6:05 PM, the Administrator was provided a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and notified that the facility had failed to prevent Resident (R)1's elopement which occurred on 05/22/26, creating a reasonable expectation that serious injury, harm, impairment, or death could have occurred, constituting IJ. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.12 - Quality of Care.The facility provided an acceptable plan for removal of the IJ on 06/02/26 at 7:34 PM. The survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth due…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)5 was adequately supervised to prevent him from eloping on 05/10/26 between 8:45 AM- 9:15 AM, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. On 05/10/26 between 8:45 AM- 9:15 AM, R5 had a successful, unwitnessed elopement from the facility. R5 was found by staff members on the sidewalk, off the facility's premises, next to an active highway. On 05/13/26, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.On 05/13/26 at 11:53 AM, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) IJ Template was presented to the Administrator for the identified failure at 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care related to R5's elopement. On 05/13/26 at 2:04 PM, the facility presented an acceptable IJ removal plan. Verification of the removal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)7 received appropriate care and services to prevent complications related to enteral feeding, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed.On 05/13/26, R7's Gastrostomy tube (G-Tube) site was observed with a dressing dated 05/03/26 stuck to the skin and a brown, crusted substance noted around the stoma. On 05/13/26, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 05/13/26 at 4:25 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 05/03/26. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care.On 05/13/26, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 05/13/26, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ. The facility remained out of compliance at F693 at a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to prevent repeat deficiencies. Cross Reference F689Findings include: Review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies, for a complaint survey on 05/13/26, indicated the facility was cited at Immediate Jeopardy-F689 when a resident eloped from the facility. Review of facility policy dated 08/01/23 and titled, Policies and Procedures. Subject: Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), revealed, . Leadership: The Center Executive Director is accountable for the overall implementation and functioning of the QAPI program. This includes but is not limited to: a) implementation b) identifying priorities c) Ensure adequate resources d) Ensures performance indicators, resident and staff input and other information is used to prioritize problems and opportunities e) ensure corrective actions are implemented to address identified problem in systems f) evaluates the effectiveness of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee included active and meaningful participation by the Medical Director in the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 08/01/23 and titled, Policies and Procedures. Subject: Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), revealed, . 6. QAA Committee members include but are not limited to: . b) Medical Director / designee . Review of the facility document titled, Quality Assessment Performance Improvement, dated 05/27/26 at 2:11 PM, identified a pre-populated list of mandatory committee members. Under the column titled Name, next to the pre-populated title Medical Director, the handwritten notation VIA Phone Text was documented. However, on the adjacent column designated for Signature, a handwritten signature was present on the Medical Director's line, creating a conflicting record regarding the Medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, interview, observation, and record review, the facility neglected to provide a safe environment and adequate supervision to protect residents from elopement, when they failed to monitor a known elopement risk for Resident (R)1, failed to update the comprehensive care plan with targeted intervention;, failed to provide adequate supervision when the resident's Wander Guard system was inactive; failed to conduct monthly elopement drills per facility policy; failed to verify door locks per protocols; and failed to develop and implement a performance improvement plan following an actual elopement on 05/13/26. The facility's neglect to provide these services resulted in 1 of 5 sampled residents (R1), who exhibited known wandering behaviors, eloping from the facility unsupervised on 05/22/26. Findings include: Review of the Summary Statement of Deficiencies, for a Complaint Survey on 05/13/26, indicated the facility was cited at Immediate Jeopardy-F689 when a resident eloped from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility and the pharmacy failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet each resident's needs by not maintaining an effective system for ordering, receiving, and supplying medications, resulting in multiple missed medication doses. This failure had the potential to cause uncontrolled symptoms, worsening medical conditions, avoidable pain, and preventable decline. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications, last revised August 2020, documented, Policy: Medications and related products are received from the pharmacy on a timely basis . Procedures . I. Ordering Medication from the Pharmacy: 1. Medications orders are written on a physician order form, telephone order sheet, or reorder from provided by the pharmacy, written in the chart by the physician, or entered into the facility's EHR systema and transmitted to the pharmacy. 2. Repeat medications (refills) are . requested via the facility's EHR system and ordered as follows: a. Reordering of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were safely and securely stored. Specifically, the B-wing medication room was observed unlocked, and the treatment carts were unlocked with the key hanging in the lock. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications last revised August 2020, documented, Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly . The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. I. General Guidance . 2. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when they are not attended by persons with authorized access.Review of the undated facility policy titled Storage and Expiration of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes and Needles, documented, Medications will be securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. Only authorized, licensed facility staff will have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were removed from storage and food items were properly stored and labeled.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Kitchenette Policy and Procedure, dated 01/29/19 revealed, Policy: Food storage areas will be maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. Food items not stored will be disposed of. Procedure: . 3. All foods requiring refrigeration will be stored in the kitchenette refrigerator behind the nurse station. Items will be marked with resident name, date and time on receipt by staff. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Food Storage revealed . 4. Food shall be rotated as delivered and used in a first in, first out method. Items will be dated on receipt, opening and/or replaced for storage to facilitate this procedure.Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Date Marking, Potentially Hazardous Food Policy and Procedure, revealed, Procedure: . 2. Foods…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a successful elopement was reported timely to the State Agency (SA) within two (2) hours of its occurrence. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation dated 10/23/2023, indicated, Neglect is the failure of the center, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Examples include but are not limited to; failure to adequately supervise a resident known to wander from the facility without the staff knowledge . Procedure: . 7. Reporting/Response- Any employee or contracted service provider who witnesses or has knowledge of an act of abuse or an allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, to a resident, is obligated to report such information…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident preferences were honored in relation to dietary meals. Specifically, the facility did not provide residents preferences or substitutes. This deficient practice had the potential to effect all residents obtaining food items from the kitchen.Findings include:During a kitchen tour on 05/12/26 at 4:48 PM, observations revealed no posted alternative menu.During an interview conducted with Cook1 on 05/13/26 at 4:55 PM, revealed she was unaware of any alternatives for residents. Cook1 stated she was preparing the supper meal, which consisted of grilled cheese sandwiches and stewed tomatoes. When asked what the alternative was for individuals who did not eat those items, she stated, I am not sure. I do not know anything about alternative choices.During an interview with Resident (R)1 on 05/13/26 at 5:58 PM, he stated, I've been here for a few weeks. No one has asked me what I like to eat. They just serve us small helpings of food. Some of the staff here has gone and brought me Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), or my…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to label and date all food stored in the walk-in cooler and ensure food was cooked at the proper temperature prior to service with the potential to affect 79 of 83 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. This failure had the potential to lead to food borne illnesses. Findings include: During initial observation of the kitchen and interview on 05/21/25 at 9:45 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM), the walk-in refrigerator revealed a container of leftover meat that he could not identify; not labeled or dated. A box of sausage links in the walk-in refrigerator was opened and sausage links wrapped in aluminum foil were not labeled or dated. The walk-in refrigerator also contained a half full pitcher with the appearance of orange juice/pulp that separated from the water content with no label or date. The DM said, oh we don't serve from a pitcher anyway, we use the juice dispenser. The walk-in cooler also contained an opened package of cheese, not labeled, or dated. The prepared cups of tea did not have lids…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to allow family visitation for one of one resident (Resident (R) 38). This failure violated R38's right as a resident of the facility and had the potential to violate the rights of 83 residents that lived in the facility. Findings include: Review of R38's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/22/25, located in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15 which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. During observation of the facility entrance on 05/21/25 at 12:40 PM, a sign was posted that read, ATTENTION! ATTENTION! VISITING HOURS: 7 AM - 7 PM, NO RE-ENTRY AFTER 7 PM. CALL [Phone number] FOR AUTHORIZED RE-ENTRY. During an interview on 05/21/25 at 12:33 PM, the Receptionist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELIYAHU MIRLIS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $58K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC