Pine View Nursing and Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 106.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.73 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Nutrition Policy, the facility failed to properly prepare pureed food and ensure nutritive value for eight of eight residents receiving a pureed diet. This failure had the potential to serve food at a lesser nutritive value that could cause weight loss.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutrition Policy effective 09/01/2024 revealed under Pureed- Dysphagia Level 1: The pureed consistency is planned according to the regular consistency, but the texture is modified to a smooth, pudding- like texture for all food items. This consistency follows the guidelines as set forth by the National Dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing) Task Force. Pureed recipes are needed for each item that requires addition of fluid and mechanical manipulation to achieve a pudding- like, smooth, lump free, puree consistency. Only nutritive fluids such as broth, gravy, juice and milk are designed for use in pureed recipes.Observation of the puree process on 02/17/2026 at 10:45 AM revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety and Sanitation, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in a manner that prevented foodborne illness to the residents, failed to ensure the food was stored at the appropriate temperatures and failed to ensure that dishes and utensils were cleaned under proper sanitary conditions. The deficient practices had the potential to place all residents at risk of acquiring foodborne illnesses. There were 104 residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen.Findings include:Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Food Safety and Sanitation revealed in the initial paragraph, Having an established policies and procedures related to food safety and sanitation, along with ongoing training and monitoring is critical in preventing foodborne illness. From receiving until service, there are certain control points that must be closely monitored. Control point- a step in the flow of food where a potential hazard can be controlled. Critical control point- the last step…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which systematically identified, reviewed, developed, and implemented plans to correct quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility failed to Maintain and/or produce documentation that demonstrates evidence of its ongoing QAPI program. The deficient practice had the potential to affect resident care outcomes and quality of life for 109 residents.Findings include:A request to review the facility QAPI program documentation, including but not limited to meeting attendance revealed the facility could not produce any documentation for review.A request to review the QAPI policy revealed QAPI policy was not produced for review.Interview on 02/19/2026 at 5:30 PM with the Administrator revealed the facility does not maintain QAPI documentation. The Administrator stated documentation is not available because the facility has not been documented as required. She further stated the QAPI program is not effective. The Administrator confirmed there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than five percent (%) for one of three residents (R) (R79) observed during medication administration. There were 26 opportunities observed for three residents with ten errors resulting in an error rate of 38.46 %.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications revised 06/06/2024 revealed in the policy statement that medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Under Policy Interpretation and Implementation: .3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame.7. The individual administering the medication must check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication.Observation of medication administration on 02/18/2026 at 08:28 AM on the C Wing with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure that medication was administered according to physician's orders for one of three residents (R) (R79) observed during medication administration. Specifically, R79 received medications by mouth when she should have received the medication through her G-tube (gastrostomy tube). This deficiency had the potential to cause R79 to aspirate which could have led to physical harm or hospitalization.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications revised 06/06/2024 revealed under Policy Statement: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed: .3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame.7. The individual administering the medication must check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Hand Hygiene and Legionella Surveillance, the facility failed to ensure staff performed proper infection control practices while serving meals to the residents on two of five halls (D Hall and E Hall). In addition, the facility failed to ensure an effective water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building's water system. The deficient practices had the potential to spread infection by cross-contamination and placed the residents at risk of waterborne illnesses, including Legionnaires disease. The facility census was 97 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, reviewed 6/25/2020, revealed the Policy section stated, Staff involved in direct resident contact will perform proper hygiene procedure to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. The Hand Hygiene Table section included Either Antimicrobial Soap and Water or Alcohol Based…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Environment, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment on three of five halls and one of two shower rooms. These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at risk of living in an unsanitary living environment and a potential for diminished quality of life. The facility census was 97 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Environment, dated 12/5/2018, revealed the Policy section stated, In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included . 9. General considerations: a. Minimize orders by disposing of soil linens…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Bedside Medication Storage, the facility failed to ensure unauthorized medications were not stored at the bedside for one of 40 sampled residents (R) (R10). This deficient practice had the potential to place R10 at risk of the use of unauthorized medications in an unsafe manner. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Bedside Medication Storage, revision date 8/2020, revealed the Policy section stated, Bedside medication storage is permitted for residents who wish to self-administer medications, upon the written order of the prescriber and once self-administration skills have been assessed and deemed appropriate in the judgment of the facility's interdisciplinary resident assessment team (or equivalent). The Procedures section included 1. A written order for the bedside storage of medication is present in the resident's medical record. 2. Bedside storage of medications is indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Policy, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notices for one of three residents (R) (R201) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure had the potential to place R201 at risk of possible denial of re-admission and loss of their room following a transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Bed Hold Policy revealed, There will be times that the resident is out of the facility overnight, whether due to a hospital stay. Should any events occur there are clear guidelines regarding payment source to maintain, or hold the resident's bed in the facility. Review of R201's admission Record revealed R201 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Section A (Identification Information) documented R201 was discharged to a short-term hospital with an anticipated return. Review of the Discharge Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded to reflect the resident's status at the time of the assessment for one of 40 sampled residents (R) (R42). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the assessment of R42's care needs. Findings Include: A review of R42's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A review of R42's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Section A (Identification Information) documented the resident had not been evaluated by Level II PASRR [Preadmission Screening and Resident Review] and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition. Review of R42's EMR revealed a PASRR Level II dated 9/21/2023. In an interview on 12/5/2204 at 10:42 am, the MDS Coordinator verified R42 had a PASRR Level…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,017 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELIYAHU MIRLIS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA