Brown Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 24.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 89.8 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, the facility failed to protect residents from sexual abuse by another resident by not reporting to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the required timeframe for one resident (R) (R85) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The deficient practice had the potential of future unreported abuse.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition review date 4/7/2025 revealed under Policy: It is the intent of this center to actively preserve each patient's right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse or misappropriation of patient property. We believe that each patient has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. The purpose of these identified procedures is to assure that we are doing all that is withing our control to create a standard of intolerance and to prevent any occurrences of any form of mistreatment, neglect, abuse or misappropriation of any patient and, or their property. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention Plan, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed for four residents (R) (R5, R11, R1 and R78), creating cross-contamination. This failure had the potential to contribute to the transmission of infectious diseases among residents and staff. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention Plan, dated 12/27/2024 revealed, under Scope Prevention of Infections - Policies, procedures, and aseptic practices are followed by personnel when performing procedures and disinfecting equipment.Observation on 9/10/2025 at 8:25 am, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) AA was performing a medication pass for R5 in Dining Room Three. CMA AA was observed with a paper towel placed on the medication cart as a barrier. She proceeded to administer medications to R11 and then R1 without changing the barrier, creating cross contamination. Interview on 9/10/25 at 9:00am with CMA AA, confirmed she used a barrier on her medication cart and did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Standard Patient Room Cleaning, the facility failed to ensure prevention of spread of infection by using foam protectors in disrepair over bed rails that created an uncleanable surface for four of four Residents (R) (R19, R22, R10, and R13) reviewed for side rail use. This deficient practice had the potential for the foam covers on the side rails to harbor bacteria and spread infection to the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Standard Patient Room Cleaning, dated January 2024, revealed 5. DISINFECT: . b. Patient zone: Using the same microfiber cloth and enhanced disinfectant, clean and disinfect surfaces in the patient's zone (i.e., over bed table, bed rails, bedside table, phone, call light cord). 1. Review of R22's undated Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab, revealed R22 was admitted with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Care Plan tab in R22's EMR revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition--Reporting and Investigating, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for two of two sampled Residents (R) (R48 and R82) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, there was no evidence the facility interviewed R48 the victim, other staff, or residents regarding the allegations of potential sexual abuse as a part of the facility's investigations. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition--Reporting and Investigating dated 12/29/2023 under the section titled, Guidelines indicated . Interviews will be conducted of pertinent parties. Written signed statements from any involved parties will be obtained if possible or a witnessed, signed interview would be an appropriate alternative. Information regarding the event will be gathered from the suspect, person making the accusations, patient involved, reliable patients who may have witnessed the incident, and any other persons who may have witnessed the incident, and any other persons who may have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to complete and electronically transmit a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to CMS's (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system for two of two residents (R) (R35 and R80) reviewed for discharge to home. Findings include: Review of the RAI Manual, dated 10/1/2019, indicated, There are three types of discharges: two are OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] required-return anticipated and return not anticipated; the third is Medicare required-Part A PPS [Prospective Payment System] Discharge. A Discharge assessment is required with all three types of discharges . Any of the following situations warrant a Discharge assessment . Resident is discharged from the facility to a private residence . Discharge Assessment - return not anticipated. 1. Review of an undated document provided by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility's policy titled, Patient's Plan of Care, the facility failed to update a Care Plan for one Resident (R) (R31) when a pacemaker monitoring device was provided to the facility and failed to ensure one (R1) was invited to participate in the quarterly care plan meeting. These failures had the potential for R31 not to receive necessary care and services for a pacemaker monitoring device and R1 not to be involved in decisions affecting care in the facility. The sample size was 41 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Patient's Plan of Care, dated 12/29/2023, revealed The patient's care plan should be reviewed . and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the patient and in response to current interventions. The comprehensive care plan should also be updated as ongoing clinical assessments identify changes. The policy also documented, The center will provide the patient and/or patient's representative with advance notice of care planning conferences to enable patient/patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Using A Portable Lifting Machine, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift sling was inspected for damage and defects after laundering for one out of five residents (R) (R13) reviewed for falls. The deficient practice caused R13 to fall from a mechanical lift sling because of a broken strap while being transferred from his motorized wheelchair to the bed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Using A Portable Lifting Machine, dated 12/29/2023, provided by the facility, revealed, Various manual and/or electric mechanical lifts may be used by this center. Manufacturer recommendations for use should be followed. Review of the manufacturer guidelines titled, Liko (Trademark) Soft Original High Back Sling, Mod. 26 Instructions for Use, dated 12/11/2013, provided by the facility, revealed Care and Maintenance of Liko Slings . Check the Sling after Washing. All points are inspected with regard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were informed or educated about the remote cardiac monitor's purpose for one of one Resident (R) (R 31) with a pacemaker monitor. The deficient practice had the potential to place R31 at risk of not receiving necessary care and monitoring for cardiac instability. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 3/6/2024, revealed Education is conducted on our L.E.A.D. platform which is assigned monthly by (Name of Company) and on an as needed basis for individuals and groups. L.E.A.D. assignments are conducted based on QAPI processes and annual education requirements for regulatory purposes. Other training needs are addressed through On-boarding and orientation-Annua/Skills Fair (completed in May 2023), Safety Boot Camp, Webinars, Staff Meetings, Huddles and (Name of Company). Notifications. (Name of Company) consultants conduct education during site visits and via Zoom meetings. Outside education is offered through GHCA, AHCA, Healthcare Coalitions and (Name of Company) training and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Skilled Inpatient Services - ADL Plan of care, the facility failed to follow the care plan for eight residents (R) (R#26, R#35, R#43, R#7, R#23, R#27) related to activities of daily living (ADL), R#19 related to falls, and R#24 related to elevated finger stick blood sugar levels. The sample size was 33. Findings include: Review of policy titled Skilled Inpatient Services ADL Plan of Care reviewed on 12/4/2021 revealed the intent is to develop and communicate patient needs for assistance with ADLs. The policy stated ADLs are assessed on admission for each resident, addressed on the baseline care plan, and communicated to the staff. Nursing is responsible for development of care plan and communication of level of assistance residents require. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed R#26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to fracture of right femur, blindness, anxiety disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Skilled Inpatient Services -ADL Plan of Care, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for six residents (R) (R#26, R#35, R#43, R#23, R#27, R#7). The sample size was 33. Findings included. Review of the policy titled Skilled Inpatient Services -ADL Plan of Care dated 12/4/2021, indicated the intent is to develop and communicate patient needs for assistance with ADLs. Guideline: Nursing develops the patient's ADL care plan and will communicate the level of assistance required for the patient. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed R#26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to fracture of right femur, blindness, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, diabetes mellites type 2. The resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 15, which indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ETHICA HEALTH — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA