Azria Health Park Place
2401 East Eighth Street, Des Moines, IA 50316 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (515) 262-9303 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $36,875 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-05)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.7% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.6% | 1.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.4% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 4.2% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 37.6% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.8% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 57.1% | 95.3% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.5% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.8% | 19.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 31.4% | 73.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 11.7% | 20.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.2% | 13.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 1.49 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 2.08 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 57.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
66 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-05 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, hospitalization record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to safely discharge 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge planning, by discharging the resident to a location that did not meet his health and safety needs. On 4/21/26, Resident #1 with a history of a traumatic brain injury and cognitive impairment was assisted by nursing staff to sign an Against Medical Advice form after the resident became upset when reminded of the facility smoking policy and stated he would just leave. Resident #1 signed the AMA form, took his belongings and left the facility via a cab. Resident #1 went to a homeless shelter without his medication and was unable to tell the shelter staff where he came from or how he arrived at the shelter. Resident #1 was then taken to a local hospital and admitted on a court order. The State Agency (SA) informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 04/28/2026 at 02:56 PM. The IJ began…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on direct observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and hygienic manner that is free from pests and protects food safety and prevents food borne illness. It further failed to maintain regular kitchen and dietary cleaning logs to maintain and ensure cleanliness in the kitchen. The facility reported a census of 59. The Stage Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 09/03/2025 at 03:55 PM. The IJ began on at least 04/29/2025. Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on 09/04/2025. The facility staff removed the IJ by implementing the following actions:1. Facility ceased operations of food service from the kitchen on 9/3/25 at 3:55pm. Facility will order outside meals, and ensure diet orders are followed.2. No residents will be impacted as kitchen operations ceased on 9/3/25.3. CDM was educated on kitchen sanitation policy on 9/3/25 at 4:00pm. Facility staff to clean/sanitize kitchen on 9/3/25. Dietary staff will be educated on 9/3/25 or prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers from developing on residents with history of pressure ulcers for two of two residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #2). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents on a therapeutic diet to include pureed food (Residents #24, #38, #40 and #42) were served the correct amount and serving size. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: During an observation 12/3/25 at 10:30 AM, Staff E, cook, prepared the pureed lunch food items following a specific recipe for each food item. The recipe was followed accurately and provided the serving scoop size for each food item. Staff E advised there were 3 residents on a full pureed diet (Residents #24, #40 and #42) and one resident on a pureed meat diet (Resident #38). The food items pureed were frosted chocolate cake, beef stew, steamed vegetables and biscuit. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #24 revealed a diet order with a start date of 2/4/25 for a general diet, pureed texture (smooth, creamy and lump-free) and thin consistency. Review of the EHR for Resident #40 revealed a diet order with a start date of 10/29/25 for a general diet, pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper food handling procedures, failed to ensure hair was covered by staff while in the kitchen area, failed to maintain a clean kitchen area where food was served to residents, failed to ensure all food was covered on room trays and failed to ensure staff used proper hand placement on glassware used to serve residents. The facility failed to prevent possible contamination of food. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:During a continuous observation 12/1/25, beginning at 12:00 PM, Staff D, Dietary Aide, placed his hand directly on the rim of a coffee cup while serving residents drinks during lunch service for four separate residents. Staff D carried two separate room trays out of the dining room down hallways with the dessert (cake) not covered. The remainder of the room trays served to residents who ate their meal in their room were placed on carts and delivered to residents with the dessert partially covered by a plastic lid. During an observation 12/3/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, the facilities past 3 surveys, and staff interview, the facility failed to correct their own deficiencies for 1 of 1 areas of concern. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:The facility had the following concern identified at the current recertification survey that had also been cited at the previous 2 recertification surveys and at a recent complaint survey at a harm level:a. Food Procurement,Store/Prepare/Serve-SanitaryThe facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated 2001, documented this facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. The objectives of the QAPI program are to:provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life.provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer the recommended pneumococcal and Influenza vaccines to eligible residents for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccines (Resident #14, Resident #33, Resident #41 and Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:1.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #14 dated 10/22/25 documented an admission date to the facility of 10/16/25 and a date of birth of [DATE]. The MDS documented that the resident had diagnoses including chronic respiratory disease, heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes. The MDS indicated that the resident had oxygen therapy. It also indicated that he was not given the influenza vaccination as it was not offered.Observation 12/03/25 at 7:28AM revealed the residents room had an oxygen concentrator, and a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine in the room at the bedside.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to limit a as needed (PRN) psychotropic drug (drugs that affect a person's mental state) to 14 days for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #21 scored a 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses to include debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder and depression. The MDS indicated the resident was not taking an antianxiety medication in the look back period. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #21 revealed an order for Lorazepam (medication to treat anxiety disorders) oral tablet 0.5 mg/ml, give 0.5 ml by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety and SOB (shortness of breath), with an order date of 8/29/25 and a discontinue date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to refer a resident (Res #3) for a Level II PASRR evaluation following a newly diagnosed mental disorder for one of four residents reviewed for PASRR (Pre admission Screening and Resident Review). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of Resident #3 dated 9/17/25 documented an admission date to the facility of 2/2/2023. The MDS documented diagnoses that included depression and psychotic disorder. The Care Plan of Resident #3 identified a (resolved) Focus Area of Antipsychotic Medications for behavior management with revision date of 10/01/25. The Encounter Note dated 12/17/24 from the facility physician documented the chief complaint for this visit was due to increased delusional behavior with hallucinations. The note additionally documented orders to add a new diagnosis of Delusional disorders, along with orders to begin an antipsychotic medication.Per review of the resident electronic health record performed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to fully submit a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation to the appropriate state-designated authority prior to admission or within 30 days for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident had diagnoses to include medically complex conditions, cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder and depression. The MDS documented the original admission date for Resident#50 as 3/3/25. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #50 lacked documentation of a Level I PASRR submitted prior to admission or within 30 days of admission. Resident #50 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview 12/2/25 at 11:30 AM, Staff F, Social Services Director (SSD), stated he just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and contracted Registered Dietitian interview, the facility failed to implement dietary interventions in a timely manner for a resident who was experiencing significant weight loss (Res # 44). The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment of Resident #44 dated 11/12/25 reflected a height of 72 inches and a weight of 122 pounds. The MDS documented the resident had experienced a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or 10% or more in the last 6 months, and that the resident was not on a physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen. The Care Plan of Resident #44 identified a Care Area of Inability to Maintain Nutrition, dated 12/19/24. The Care Plan directed staff to provide and serve supplements are ordered. The Weights section of Resident #44 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented a weight of 138.5 pounds on 5/5/25. The EHR documented a weight of 122 pounds on 11/6/25, a 11.91% loss. The Orders section of the EHR documented an order for a nutritional supplement was placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to perform pre and post dialysis assessments for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Res #6). The facility reported a census of 51. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment of Resident #6 dated 11/12/25 documented diagnoses that included renal (kidney) failure. The MDS documented the resident received hemodialysis during the last 14 days of the look back period. The MDS documented that the resident scored a 14 out 15 for the brief interview for mental status, indicating intact cognitive skills. The Care Plan documented a Focus Area of Dialysis, dated 11/7/25. The Care Plan documented the resident attending dialysis on Monday, Wednesdays and Fridays, dated 11/7/25. The Care Plan failed to direct staff to perform pre and post dialysis assessments. The Evaluation section of the Electronic Health Record revealed pre and post dialysis assessment were logged for a total of 10 times between 11/7/25 and 12/3/25. The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for November of 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to follow through and act on recommendations of Pharmacy drug regimen reviews to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #21 scored a 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses to include debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure, anxiety disorder and depression. The MDS indicated the resident was taking high-risk drug classes to include an antipsychotic in the look back period. The Care Plan for Resident #21, with an initiation date of 9/4/25, included a focus area the resident is on a antipsychotic medication with a goal the resident will be/remain free of psychotropic drug related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer the recommended COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccines (Resident #14, Resident #41 and Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #14 dated 10/22/25 documented an admission date to the facility of 10/16/25 and a date of birth of [DATE]. It also indicated that he was not up to date with his COVID-19 vaccination.The Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated that Resident #14 received the COVID-19 vaccination on 12/4/25 at 12:00 AM and no education was provided. The EHR lacked documentation of offering, educating or declination of vaccination prior to this time and date. The progress notes indicated that the vaccination time was actually 8:14 AM on 12/4/25.2.The MDS of Resident #41 dated 10/8/25 documented an admission date to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility also failed to maintain and ensure adequate supplies of the appropriate sized briefs to meet the needs of all residents who used briefs and pull-ups, and failed to ensure an adequate supply of resident care supplies and linens for two of two units. The facility identified a census of 59 residents.Findings include: Observations on the North Hall on 9/3/25 starting at 12:34 PM revealed the following: a. The window air conditioner (AC) vent in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a black substance that appeared to be mold and dirt inside the vents. The AC was on during this time. b. The window AC unit in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a black substance that appeared to be mold in the vents. The room smelled musty. c. room [ROOM NUMBER]- the bathroom floor in front of the toilet had a black non-skid strip missing and particles of old glue on the floor. The wall base was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, call light reports, resident council meeting notes, and policy review the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet resident needs with toileting assistance and answering call lights (within 15 minutes) for 2 of 2 units. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include:1.The Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 had diagnoses of a hip fracture, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (Stroke), muscle weakness and a history of falls. The MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident had dependence on staff for transfers. The Care Plan revised 8/21/25 revealed Resident #15 had an ADL impairment related to impaired mobility and a recent surgical repair of her hip fracture. The resident had a fall with major injury on 8/21/25. The Care Plan directed staff to be sure to respond promptly to all requests for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website data, and resident council meeting notes the leadership of the facility failed to provide adequate management of the facility. The Administrative team failed to provide adequate incontinent supplies, linen supplies and a comfortable homelike environment free of vermin. In addition, the facility failed to provide the residents with a clean kitchen. The facility identified a census of 59 residents. Findings include:Observations conducted on 9/3/25 at 12:34 PM revealed the following concerns during a walk through the North hallway; black like substances on vents of two air conditioners in two resident rooms, missing wall base in two resident rooms, minimal incontinent supplies in the North Clean Utility room (1 package XL briefs, 3 packages of wipes), room22 bathroom ceiling with spackling /heavy patches. Also, during the initial walk through the building resident mattresses were noted to been stained, a strong foul smell was noted in different areas of the building, stained linen on beds,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Report (CASPER) from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), staff interview, and review of the facility QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) plan, the facility failed to ensure an effective process to address previously identified quality deficiencies. The facility reported a census of 59 residents.Findings Include:The CASPER Report for the facility identified the facility had previously received an Infection control deficiency in 2023 and 2024. A Safe, clean, and homelike environment deficiency in 2023 and 2024. At the conclusion of the complaints survey on 09/11/2025 the facility was cited again for Infection control and Homelike environment. The Facility's QAPI Plan, revised 2/05/2025, identified a monitoring process which included multiple sources of data. The QAPI Plan failed to identify a process to address previously identified quality deficiencies.Review of the QAPI minutes since 11/27/2024 identified repeat deficiencies and deficient practices from the last standard survey, but did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on direct observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care and transfers in a manner that promotes hygiene and protects residents from the spread of disease when they failed to change contaminated gloves and used another residents mechanical lift sling without sanitizing it first for 3 of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident #1, #8, and #12). In addition, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when providing care to a resident with an indwelling catheter (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 59.Findings include: 1. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #8, dated 10/15/2024, documented the residents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score as 14, indicating intact cognition. It documented the following relevant diagnosis of indwelling catheter. It also documented the residents dependency on staff for transfers and the use of a wheelchair for mobility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, manufacturer instructions, and policy review the facility failed to lock brakes on a bed when staff repositioned and provided cares for 1 of 3 residents observed (Resident #12), and failed to operate a mechanical lift safely for 2 of 3 residents observed for transfers (Resident #12 and #1). The facility reported a census 59 residents. Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had diagnoses of left above the knee amputation, fracture, muscle weakness, morbid obesity, and anxiety disorder. The MDS recorded the resident had no falls since re-entry to the facility on 3/14/25. The MDS documented the resident had dependence on staff for transfers. The Care Plan revised 1/24/25 revealed the resident had a risk for injury related to falls. The Care Plan revealed staff directives to use a mechanical lift and two staff for transfers. The care plan documented the resident had a fall out of bed 12/30/24 and diagnosed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment and reduce clutter in the hallway for 2 or 2 units (North and South Halls). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Observations revealed the following: a. On 11/19/24 at 10:45 AM, the North hall had equipment parked in the hallway by the handrails including a mechanical lift, a shower chair, a stand mechanical lift, a plastic bin with drawers containing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), carts for trash and soiled laundry, two medication carts, a treatment cart, and a wheelchair. At the same time, the North/Central hall had equipment parked along the hallway and handrails including a mechanical lift, a stand mechanical lift, and a large motorized wheelchair. At 10:55 AM, the staff on the North hall had to move to the side of the hallway in order to allow a male resident to propel his wheelchair down the hall to his room. At 12:45 PM, a wheelchair sat by the exit door in the North hall. The North hall had a stand mechanical lift, a plastic bin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation of dinner service on 11/20/24 at 5:20 PM revealed Staff C [NAME] was serving dinner in the dining room. Staff C placed tin pans in the steam table then licked her right index finger. Staff C continued with food service without washing her hands after licking her finger. At 5:45 PM in between plating resident's food, Staff C placed her right hand on her mouth, touching her lips with her finger tips and hand. Staff C continued with dinner service without washing her hands. On 11/21/24 at 1:00 PM Staff D Dietary Aide and Staff E [NAME] were in the kitchen. Staff E had a hair net up with his long hair hanging out the bottom of the hair net, resting on his shoulders. Staff D had his hair in braids and pulled back in a pony tail with the hair net only covering the hair in the pony tail. The hair net was not covering his hair his pony tail at the center of the back of his head to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility investigation file review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse including allegations of staff to resident verbal threats and rough treatment, and inappropriate touching of a resident's buttocks by Staff A were reported timely to the facility administration for three of four residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #10, #38, and #28). The incident of alleged abuse that occurred on 8/8/24 was not reported to the Department of Inspections, and Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) until 8/30/24. The allegation of abuse on 10/21/24 was not reported to DIAL until 10/23/24. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had diagnoses of cerebral vascular disease (CVA) (stroke), hemiplegia, anxiety disorder, and chronic pain. The MDS recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. A Past Calls report dated 9/20/24 to 11/19/24 revealed call light response greater than 15 minutes for the following: a. Room North (N) 10: 9/20 - 9/30/24: 16 times, with the longest response time 2 hours and 33 minutes 10/1 - 10/31/24: 35 times, with the longest response time 2 hours and 12 minutes 11/1 - 11/18/24: 5 times, with the longest response time 33 minutes The majority of call light response times greater than 15 minutes occurred on the evening (2 PM - 10 PM) and night (10 PM - 6 AM) shifts. b. Room N20 9/20 -9/30/24: 6 times with the longest response time 2 hours and 17 minutes 10/1 - 10/31/24: 42 times with the longest response time 3 hours and 3 minutes 11/1 - 11/18/24: 17 times with the longest response time 1 hour and 1 minute. The majority of call light response times greater than 15 minutes occurred on the night (10 PM - 6 AM) and evening (2 PM - 10 PM) shifts. During an interview 11/26/24 at 8:40 AM, the Regional Director of Operations reported call light response times were part of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide three of three sampled residents the required properly filled out forms for Medicare Liability Notices and Beneficiary Appeals within 48 hours of when skilled services ending (Resident # 26, # 204, # 205). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Record review of Resident #26 revealed last day of skilled coverage was dated 10/29/24. The facility issued a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Centers for Medicare Services (CMS) Form #10123 and the form was signed before the 48 hour required window. However, the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) CMS form #10055 was not present. Record review showed Resident #26 was a current resident of the facility at the time of the survey. Record review of Resident #204 revealed last day of skilled coverage was dated 06/27/24. The facility issued a NOMNC CMS Form #10123 that was signed by the power of attorney (POA) on 06/24/24, well within the 48-hour required window. However,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately complete 1 of 30 resident's (Resident #47) MDS assessment tools. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: According to the Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 8/23/24. The MDS documented Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a short-term general hospital. The MDS indicated he was discharged from the facility on 8/23/24 to a short-term general hospital. The Care Plan focus area with an initiation date of 8/12/24 documented Resident #47 wished to returned to prior living arrangement at his group home. Review of a document titled Discharge Plan, Instructions and Summary dated 8/21/24 with a lock date of 9/3/24, documented Resident #47's goals of care and treatment preferences were to return to group managed facility. Resident #47 was discharged on 8/23/24 to a waiver-based housing with home health. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to submit a new preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) level 1 screening as required for 1 of 20 residents screened (Resident #32). The facility reported a census of 49. Findings include: The Annual Minimum data set (MDS) for Resident #32, dated 08/02/2024, documented a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. It recorded the following relevant diagnoses: stroke, non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiparesis, seizure disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder. The Care Plan for Resident #32, last revised 11/14/2024, documented a delusional disorder and the antipsychotic and antidepressant therapy currently used by the resident to manage symptoms. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/2024, documented use of Olanzapine, an antipsychotic, every day in the month. It further documented the use of Venlafaxine, a selective Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor (SNRI) used to treat depression, every day in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to track and document behaviors for residents taking psychiatric medication for 3 of 3 residents screened (Resident #32, #11, and #24). The facility reported a census of 49. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum data set (MDS) for Resident #32, dated 08/02/2024, documented a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. It recorded the following relevant diagnoses: stroke, non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiparesis, seizure disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder. The Care Plan for Resident #32, last revised 11/14/2024, documented the resident had alterations in mood and behavioral symptoms and was receiving antipsychotic and antidepressant therapy to manage symptoms. It directed staff to attempt non-drug approaches to redirect behavior as appropriate, but did not document what behaviors the resident had nor what non-drug approaches should be used. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/2024, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview and manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to administer insulin flexpen to ensure the proper amount of insulin administered for one resident observed who received insulin during medication pass (Resident #28). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, and had received insulin injections seven of the seven days during the lookback period. The Medication administration record (MAR) dated 11/01/24 through 11/30/24 revealed insulin Lispro subcutaneous solution 8 units injected subcutaneously three times a day. During an observation on 11/20/24 at 01:14 PM, Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), prepared to administer the Lispro pen-injector to Resident #28. She was observed taking the medication out of the box, checking the MAR, and then administering the medication to Resident #28. She was not observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, environmental tour, resident, staff and laundry personnel interviews, the facility failed to provide clean, available linen draw-pads for resident care and failed to keep a clean, safe, and comfortable homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: On 2/28/24 at 10:50 am, Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated the facility did not have enough facility linen in the mornings. He stated if the night shift used a lot of linen (i.e. wash clothes, draw pads, etc.), the morning staff had to wait until the laundry was washed, restocked and available. He stated linen would not be available until 10:30 am one to two times per week. Observation on 2/28/24 at 10:57 am revealed the South nursing hall linen supply closet revealed no draw pads were stocked. Staff F, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) toured the supply closet and confirmed no draw pads were available. On 2/28/24 at 11:00 am, Staff A, CNA stated there wasn't enough linen (pads, chucks,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to give medications as directed per the physicians orders during medication pass for (Resident #13), and failed to draw labs as ordered for (Resident #7) failed to follow physician orders for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #16, #19, and #20). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #13 with diagnosis for which included hypertension, ulcerative colitis, chrones disease, diabetes mellitus, arthritis and restless leg syndrome. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 for which indicated no impaired cognition, and required dependence with activities of daily living. The Clinical Physicians Orders on the Point Click Care Program dated 2/2/23, instructed to take Rivaroxaban (Xarelto)(medication to treat and prevent blood clots) oral tablet 20 milligrams by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate resident records for 4 of 4 residents reviewed, (Resident #7, #16, #19 and #20). The facility census was 48 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #7 with diagnosis for which included anemia, atrial fibrillation and aphasia. The resident had short and long term memory impairments and modified decision making abilities and required assistance with activities of daily living. The MDS also documented the use of anticoagulant in the last 7 days. The Progress Notes dated 1/2/24 at 5:41 p.m., documented resident is on Coumadin and will required INR checks on Wednesday. Labs needed CBC (complete blood test)(used to look at over all health), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel)(test that measures 14 different substances in the blood), Lipid (blood test that can measure the amount of cholesterol and triglycerides in your blood), A1C (a blood test that measures your average…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview along with facility policy and procedure the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 out of 5 resident reviewed. (Resident #6 and #17). The facility identified a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #6, with an assessment reference dated 1/25/24, documented diagnosis for which included Renal insufficiency, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident, anxiety and depression. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, for which indicated no impairments with decision making or memory problems, has adequate hearing and is able to make self understood and has the ability to understand others. The MDS document that the resident required total assistance with the toilet, personal hygiene, and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder and received a diuretic in the last 7 days. The Plan of Care with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interview, clinical record review and policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care by failing to ensure all stool was removed from the resident's skin for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #8) and failed to assist a resident with incontinency (Resident #6) and failed to assist a resident with supervision at meals (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. On 2/28/24 at 11:07 AM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff B, CNA, provided peri-care to Resident #8 following a incontinent bowel movement. Staff B cleaned the resident's intergluteal cleft and the posterior portion of his scrotum. A round area of stool remained on Resident #8's left hamstring after Staff B helped the resident dress. At 11:20 am, Staff B stated she was not certain she cleaned the resident's skin completely and noted the stool on his hamstring upon rechecking his skin. Staff B cleaned the resident's skin and helped him dress. The Quarterly MDS for Resident #8 dated 1/31/24 identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interview at the time of the investigation, the facility failed to promptly identify and intervene for two residents that were at risk for pressure ulcers for 2 of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident #1 and #2). The facility identified a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed for Resident #1 with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/8/23, documented diagnosis for which included peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer dementia and depression. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated no impaired cognitive decisions and no impairments for hearing or the ability to be understood and understand others and does not resist cares. The resident required partial to substantial assistance from staff for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and dependent with transfers. The MDS also documented a wheelchair as prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a door was alarmed in the basement for which one (1) resident who was seen getting onto the elevator with staff supervision and went down to the basement (Resident #16) and failed to supervise two (2) residents who were not suppose to be in left in rooms unsupervised (Resident #15 and #16) and also failed to keep medication carts locked at all times on two (2) incidents. The facility census was 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #16 documented diagnosis for which included hypertension, non-Alzheimer dementia and low back pain. The MDS documented the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 for which indicated moderately impaired decision making abilities, adequate hearing and has the ability to be understood and understand others, no wandering observed, a walker used for mobility and independent with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy the facility failed to have 1 of 3 residents seen at least once every 60 days by the physician. (Resident #6) The facility census was 48 residents. Finding include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #6, with an assessment reference dated 1/25/24, documented diagnosis for which included Renal insufficiency, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident, anxiety and depression. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, for which indicated no impairments with decision making or memory problems, has adequate hearing and is able to make self understood and has the ability to understand others, needs total dependence on toilet and personal hygiene and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder and receives a diuretic in the last 7 days. The Clinical Record for Resident #6 documented that the Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner seen the patient on these dates: *11/2/2023 *11/16/23 *12/7/23 *12/14/23 *2/1/24 *2/15/24 *2/19/24 *3/5/24 The clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, along with the facility policy, the facility staff failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner (no longer than 15 minutes) for 3 of 3 residents reviewed . (Resident #2, #14 and #15). The facility identified a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 2/22/24 documented Resident #2 had diagnosis that included orthostatic hypotension, neurogenic bladder, . The assessment documented the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no impaired decision making abilities. The assessment documented the resident as dependent on two (2) staff members with bed mobility, toilet use and personal hygiene and total assistance of one person physical assist with bathing. During an interview on 1/19/22 at 2:44 p.m., Resident #2 stated that it will take the staff over an hour an a half to answer the call light. During an interview on 2/10/22 at 10:00 a.m., Staff C, Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) confirmed and verified that it will take over 15 minutes to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review and policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #8) and failed to provide hand hygiene supplies to prevent cross contamination for 3 of 3 residents (#8, #9, and #10). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: On 2/28/24 at 11:07 AM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff B, CNA, provided peri-care to Resident #8 following a incontinent bowel movement. Staff B cleaned the resident's intergluteal cleft and the posterior portion of his scrotum. A round area of stool remained on Resident #8's left hamstring after Staff B helped the resident dress. (677) On 2/28/24 at 11:15 am, Staff B helped the resident get dressed and raised the urinary catheter collection bag above the resident's bladder and allowed the urine in the catheter tubing to flow back toward the resident's bladder. She guided the collection bag through the left leg opening of the resident's shorts and released the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, document review, and staff interview the facility failed to implement the abuse and neglect policy by not completing background checks prior to staff employment. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of document with effective date of 9/1/18 titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Prohibition and Prevention Program Policy revealed. a. All prospective employees undergo a background-screening process in accordance with Human Resource policies and procedures and applicable law. Review of background check for Staff C revealed the background check was completed 3/2/11. Review of an untitled document with staff phone number and hire dates provided by the facility revealed a hire date for Staff C of 8/7/23. On 11/15/23 at 2:24 PM Staff D stated Staff C had been hired at least 3 times in the past. Staff D stated the facility's expectation was that the background check would have been resubmitted and received prior to rehiring Staff C. On 11/15/23 at 2:54 PM the Administrator stated staff would have resident direct care training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, document review, and staff interview the facility failed to make nursing staff information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time. The facility failed to post the nurse staffing data. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: An observation on 11/15/23 at 2:30 PM revealed nursing staff information posted outside of the DON's office on a bulletin board had staffing from 11/9/23 posted. Review of an untitled document on 11/15/23 with nursing staff information revealed nursing staff information for the date of 11/9/23. On 11/15/23 at 2:54 PM the Administrator stated the facility's expectation was that the nursing staff information would be posted readily available to residents at any given time. The Administrator stated he had designated a staff to post the information but was not being completed as required.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to complete Monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) by a licensed pharmacist for 4 of 5 residents reviewed (#14, #18, #31, & #37). The facility reported a census of 49. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility binder titled, Pharmacy Monthly Regimen Review revealed it was completed by a licensed pharmacist for the months of February, March, May, June, and July 2023, but not reviewed by the pharmacist for the months April, September, & October. During an interview 11/15/23 at 4:33 PM Staff H revealed that MRR's could not be proven that they were completed and sent to the Primary Care Physician (PCP). Staff H further revealed her expectation is for MRR's to be completed and sent to the physician for review every month. Review of a facility provided policy titled, Medication Regimen Reviews with a revision date of May 2019 documented: 1. Within 24 hours of the MRR, the consultant pharmacist provides a written report to the attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a well balanced diet that meets nutritional and special dietary needs by use of incorrect serving size portions for meals for 18 of 49 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of an undated document titled Consistency List revealed 4 residents required a pureed diet, 2 residents requested pureed meat diet, and 12 residents required a mechanical soft diet. On 11/13/23 at 4:15 PM Staff I, Cook, stated the serving size scoop for the pureed sandwich would be either a green #12 or blue #16. Staff I stated he would use the blue #16. Staff I stated he did not know what the serving size was for beets because the week one menu was in the dietary managers office. Staff I stated he did not know how many mechanical soft diets were ordered. An observation of the supper meal service on 11/13/23 at 5:10 PM revealed Staff I used a blue handled scoop #16 for pureed sandwich and a red handled scoop #24 for pureed beets. Review of document titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on document review and staff interview the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified nutrition professional by not having a certified dietary manager. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Request for documentation from Staff L of qualifications for dietary manager revealed no certification or documentation. On 11/15/23 at 3:00 PM Staff A, Senior [NAME] President of Clinical Services, stated the dietary manager is not certified as a dietary manager and does not have a certificate. Staff A stated the facility does not have a policy on employment of a dietary manager. On 11/15/23 at 11:05 AM the Administrator stated the facility's expectation was that the facility would employ a full time dietitian or a certified dietary manager. The Administrator stated the facility did not employ either at that time.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards by not labeling foods that were open with open dates, did not maintain chemical solution at the correct concentration in a low temperature dish machine, ensure kitchen staff wear hair restraints appropriately, and did not practice appropriate hand hygiene by touching food and contaminated objects. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: An observation of supper meal service on 11/13/23 at 5:10 PM revealed Staff I completed hand hygiene prior to meal service. Staff I then picked up a grilled cheese sandwich with his bare right hand and placed the sandwich on a plate. Staff I then used a scoop with his right hand to serve soup into a bowl with left hand holding the bowl. Staff I then used tongs in his right hand to serve beets into a bowl held in left hand. Staff I then picked up the next sandwich with his right hand and placed it on the next plate. This service continued without hand hygiene through the entire meal service. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing catheter cares, enteral tube feedings, wound care and personal care for residents, and failed to review the infection control policy annually with appropriate staff. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. On 11/13/23 at 1:40 PM an observation revealed Staff O, CNA standing in front of the administrators office door with a COVID test in hand. Staff O was not wearing a mask. Staff O was discussing symptoms and the COVID test with the used COVID test in hand without a mask. Staff O walked back down to the DON's office with the test in hand. DON present in office with Staff O while not wearing a mask. Staff O applied her mask prior to leaving the facility. A resident was present in DON's office while Staff O was present. Staff O walked down 2 resident halls with residents present in the hallways and rooms to obtain the COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, document review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property when 3 employees reviewed did not have current training for Dependent Adult Abuse. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of document with effective date of 9/1/18 titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Prohibition and Prevention Program Policy revealed: a. The facility maintains an abuse-prevention training program for all new hires and existing staff that is consistent with their expected roles. b. Resident rights and abuse-prevention training is conducted during orientation and at least annually for all employees. Request for documentation of Dependent Adult Abuse training from the Administrator for Staff E, Staff F, and Staff G revealed no documentation or certificate for Staff E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on policy review, document review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure continued competence of nurse aides by failing to provide the required in-service training at a minimum of 12 hours per year for 5 of 5 employees reviewed. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of the last 12 months of nursing aide in-service revealed 2.5 hours completed for the month of January 2023 and 1 hour for the month of August 2023. Review of document revised 8/22 titled In-Service Training, Nurse Aide revealed annual in-services are no less than 12 hours per employment year. On 11/15/23 at 2:19 PM the Administrator stated the facility's expectation was nursing aides would have completed at least 12 hours of in-service training a year. The Administrator stated the in-service training documents provided were all that could be found for the last year of in-services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete activities of daily living on a resident requiring assistance with gown change and hygiene. The facility further failed to provide privacy to a resident requiring enteral feeding for 2 of 8 residents reviewed (Residents #21 & #32). Findings include: 1. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #21, dated 9/3/23 revealed diagnoses of cysticercosis (a parasitic tissue infection caused by larval cysts of the tapeworm), dysphagia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrostomy status. During an observation 11/14/23 at 12:15 PM Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered Resident #21's room and announced to Resident #21 who she was and what she was doing. Staff B then did not check placement of Resident #21's gastrostomy tube before completing water flushes and enteral feeding. During this observation it was noted that Staff B did not have the door shut with Resident #21's shirt up exposing the abdomen. Halfway through this observation Staff P (LPN - Unit Manager) was in Resident #21's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and the facility policy review, the facility failed to keep a clean, safe, and comfortable homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. An observation during the facility's environmental tour on 11/13/23 from 1:50 PM to 2:30 PM revealed the following concerns: a. The primary wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] South had an area of spackle that was unpainted. b. The wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] South had peeled paint above the bed's headboard. c. The wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] South had unpainted spackle above the bed's headboard. There was also a large puddle of water on the floor in the center of the room slightly closer to the entry door. d. The door magnet used to hold the door open in room [ROOM NUMBER] South was misaligned and had to be manually adjusted to function properly. e. The wall across from the South unit nurses' station had a dried, brown liquid stain that resembled splashed beverage. On 11/20/23 at 9:30 AM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #24, and #34). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #24's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that Resident #24 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 6/2/23. 2. Review of Resident #34's EHR revealed that Resident #34 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 4/13/23. Review of the facility policy for notifying the Long-Term Care Ombudsman revealed there was no policy. During an Interview 11/15/23 at 10:54 AM with Staff A and the Administrator revealed the facility had no ombudsman notification for these hospitalizations. Staff A and the Administrator revealed their expectation is for notification of the ombudsman when a Resident is sent to the hospital.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to obtain bed hold notifications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #24, #34). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a most recent admit date from an acute hospital stay dated 4/13/23. Review of Resident #24's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that Resident #24 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 4/13/23. 2. Review of Resident #34's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a most recent admit date from an acute hospital stay dated 6/2/23. Review of Resident #34's EHR revealed that Resident #34 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 6/2/23. During an Interview 11/15/23 at 10:54 AM with Staff A and the Administrator revealed the facility did not have bed hold notifications for these hospitalizations. Staff A and the Administrator revealed their expectation is for a bed hold to be completed when a Resident is sent to the hospital.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #4, & #25). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. On 11/13/23 at 1:54 PM, a post-it note was observed on Resident #4's dresser directing staff to weigh the resident daily before breakfast. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. It also indicated the resident required extensive, one-person assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) except eating. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of Morbid Obesity, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), urine retention, and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). The EHR Weight and Vitals section revealed multiple days with no documented weight. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide staff assistance for activities of daily living by not offering an opportunity to complete oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #29). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #29 entered the facility on 12/1/22. MDS documented diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anemia, Unsteadiness on feet, and History of falling. The MDS further revealed that Resident #29 needed partial/moderate staff assistance with oral hygiene. During an observation of Resident #29 room on 11/13/23 at 01:38 PM revealed no oral hygiene supplies in the private bathroom. During a subsequent observation of Resident #29 room on 11/14/23 at 12:30 PM, no oral hygiene supplies were present in the private bathroom. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/14/23 at 2:58 PM, stated her expectations were for the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide needed services in accordance with professional standards by not providing medical services related to inadequate dental health and by not following physicians orders for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #34 & Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 9/4/23 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. During an observation on 11/13/23 at 1:50 PM with Resident #34 revealed the Resident was missing teeth and had broken teeth. During an interview 11/13/23 at 1:50 PM with Resident #34 revealed he has been trying to get into a dentist for 6 months and hasn't been yet. Review of a facility provided document titled Patient History, from an outside dental clinic revealed Resident #34 had seen a dental provider 3/21/22 for pulp vitality tests, limited oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to prevent decline in range of motion and mobility for 2 of 2 resident (Resident #1 & #25). The facility reported a census of 49. Findings include: 1. On 11/14/23 at 8:30 AM, Resident #25 stated she was not receiving restorative therapy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. It included diagnoses of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). It also indicated the resident was dependent with repositioning, transferring, and showering/bathing and required maximal assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. The Physician Orders directed Physical and Occupational Therapy to evaluate and treat the resident. The Care Plan did not include restorative therapy as a focus or intervention. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures regarding the technical aspect of feeding tubes by not applying initials to formula bottles. The facility further failed to verify the gastrostomy tube (feeding tube) was functioning properly before beginning a feeding for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #21, #45, and #47). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #21, dated 9/3/23 revealed diagnoses of cysticercosis (a parasitic tissue infection caused by larval cysts of the tapeworm), dysphagia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrostomy status. During an observation 11/14/23 at 12:15 PM Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered Resident #21's room and announced to Resident #21 who she was and what she was doing. Staff B then did not check placement of Resident #21's gastrostomy tube before completing water flushes and enteral feeding. During an interview 11/14/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete pre and post dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis treatment (#25). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: On 11/14/23 at 11:54 AM, Resident #25 stated she receives hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and the facility staff does not always take her vital signs before she leaves and never checks her vital signs or dialysis port when she returns. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. It included diagnoses of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). It also indicated she was receiving dialysis. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) included an order dated 10/12/23 directing staff to complete vital signs, weight, and an evaluation before and after dialysis. It also directed staff to obtain the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to respond to residents' call light within 15 minutes for 2 residents reviewed (Residents #14 & #28). The facility reported a census of 49. Findings included 1. On 11/13/23 at 3:19 PM, Resident #14 stated her resident call bell system did not function properly. The resident pressed and activated her call light system. A red light was noted on the resident's wall outlet. At 3:40 PM, an observation of the call light monitor screen at the South nurses' station revealed the resident's call bell notification didn't register as would be indicated by the listing of the resident's room number. A staff member entered the resident's room at 3:40 PM when the surveyor exited. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Parkinson's Disease, anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to implement gradual dose reductions (GDR) instead continued psychotropic medications without review and failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications did not exceed 14 days without physician review for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 9/24/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further documented diagnosis of anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page title Physician Orders revealed Resident #34 had active orders for Ativan/Lorazepam 0.5 mg oral tablet as necessary (PRN) give one tablet every 6 hours for anxiety/restlessness. Review of a facility provided document titled, Noted to Attending Physician/Prescriber with a Medication Regimen Review date of 8/10/23 documented: CMS regulations require that all PRN psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to keep all medications in a locked medication cart, inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: A continuous observation on 11/13/23 from 04:49 PM to 04:52 PM near the nurses station on North Hall revealed a medication cart left unattended while medications were stored on top of the cart, a total of 5 pre-filled insulin pens/syringes. Four residents had passed by the cart. In an interview with Staff R, Regional Director of Operations on 11/13/23 at 04: 53 PM she stated her expectation was for the staff to lock medications in the medication cart if staff stepped away from the cart. A facility provided policy titled Administering Medications revised on 4/2019 documented the medication cart had to be closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide and no medications were to be kept on top of the medication cart.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide needed assistance in making appointments for dental services for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #34 dated 9/4/23 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. During an observation on 11/13/23 at 1:50 PM, Resident #34 noted to be missing teeth and had broken teeth. During an interview 11/13/23 at 1:50 PM Resident #34 revealed he had been trying to get into a dentist for 6 months and hasn't been yet. Review of a facility provided document titled Patient History, from an outside dental clinic, revealed Resident #34 had seen a dental provider 3/21/22 for pulp vitality tests, limited oral evaluation, x-ray, and 3 teeth being extracted. This document further revealed that Resident #34 was seen by this clinic 12/2/22 for pulp vitality tests, limited oral evaluation, and x-ray. This document further detailed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 3 of 8 residents reviewed (Residents #6, #32, and #34) The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: An observation of supper meal service on 11/13/23 at 5:10 PM revealed the temperature of the pureed grilled cheese sandwich was 119 degrees Fahrenheit and the temperature of the pureed beets were 119 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of a document dated 2001 titled Food Preparation and Service revealed mechanically altered hot foods prepared for a modified consistency diet remain above 135 degrees Fahrenheit during preparation or they reheat to 165 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 15 seconds. On 11/13/23 at 4:15 PM Staff I, Cook, stated he never checks the temperatures on the pureed food prior to serving. On 11/15/23 at 11:05 AM the Administrator stated the facility's expectation was that the temperatures of pureed and mechanical soft food would be served at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to produce Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) documentation that demonstrated the implementation and effectiveness of a comprehensive QAPI program that addressed the full range of services the facility provided. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: In an interview on 11/20/23 at 02:28 PM the Administrator and Staff R, Regional Director of Operations, revealed they were aware that the QAPI program needed improvement and due to high turnover of the administrators in the previous year, they lacked consistency of the QAPI program. A review of the facility provided policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program revised 2/2020 documented: 1. This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. 2. The QAPI plan describes the process for identifying and correcting quality deficiencies. Key components of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist in attendance during the facilities quarterly meetings from December 2022 to November 2023 for 2 out of 4 quarters. The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: Record review of the facilities last 12 months of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meeting agenda/minutes revealed an Infection Preventionist was not in attendance during the facilities quarterly meetings for Quarter 1 & Quarter 2 of 2023 (from February through June). A review of the facility provided policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program revised 2/2020 documented the committee meets monthly to review reports, evaluate data, and monitor QAPI-related activities and makes adjustments to the plan. In an interview on 11/20/23 at 02:28 PM the Administrator and Staff R, Regional Director of Operations, revealed they were aware that QAA meetings lacked consistency of required attendees.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call system functioned properly for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 49. Findings included On 11/13/23 at 3:19 PM, Resident #14 stated her resident call bell system did not function properly. The resident pressed and activated her call light system. A red light was noted on the resident's wall outlet. At 3:40 PM, an observation of the call light monitor screen at the South nurses' station revealed the resident's call bell notification didn't register as would be indicated by the listing of the resident's room number. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Parkinson's Disease, anxiety disorder, depression, Bipolar disorder, Schizophrenia, and drug induced tremors. It revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$36,875 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $14,385 — penalty dated 2026-05-05
- $22,490 — penalty dated 2025-09-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AZRIA HEALTH — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCP IOWA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 09/17/2019 |
| KAMINER, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | since 09/17/2019 |
| OXFORD FINANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 09/17/2019 |
| ANDERSON, KELSEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/02/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $822K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165202. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.