Azria Health Wichita
7057 West Village Circle, Wichita, KS 67205 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (316) 977-7015 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2025
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.4% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 61.4% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 11.0% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.2% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 40.6% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.5% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.4% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.5% | 22.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.9% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.23 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 167 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.0%CMS range 52.3–65.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 8.3–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 75.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 89.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.5%CMS range 5.7–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 61.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.55 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate effective interventions according to standards of care to prevent the development of a right dorsal (the back, or upper surface of the foot) foot, facility acquired Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue may be present) for Resident (R)2. Findings included: - R2's Physician Order Sheet dated 06/21/22, included diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension), diabetes mellitus Type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hyponatremia (greater than normal concentration of sodium in the blood), and right-side hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/21/22, documented R2 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had one main kitchen and two kitchenette/serving areas. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods in the kitchen were properly labeled and stored. The facility failed to ensure food service areas, refrigerators, counters and cabinets in the kitchenettes were clean. Findings included:- Observation during the initial tour of the main kitchen on 02/23/26 at 08:04 AM revealed the following:The dry storage area had a box of cream of wheat that was opened, not dated and not in a sealed container/bag.An opened 10-pound bag of macaroni noodles that was not dated and not in a sealed bag.A half-gallon sized opened carton of rainbow sprinkles that was not dated or in a sealed container.An open bag with five hamburger buns not dated or sealed.The walk-in refrigerator had a five-pound bag of shredded cheese that was opened, not dated and not in a sealed bag, and a container with fish in it was not sealed.The kitchen serving area refrigerator had about 12 slices of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices related to hand hygiene, respiratory equipment, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care), and indwelling catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) care.Findings included:1. On 02/23/26 at 10:37 AM, Resident (R)30 was in her room in bed, with the catheter bag attached to her bed. A sign for EBP was on the door. There was a bin for personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns, face shields and/or eyeglasses/goggles, and gloves), but there were no gowns in the bin.On 02/24/26 at 09:10 AM, R30 sat at the dining room table drinking her chocolate milk, the catheter bag was hanging outside of the dignity bag and catheter bag was touching the floor.On 02/24/26 at 09:20 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S assisted R30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 27 or her representative about the risk and benefits of taking an antianxiety (a class of medications that calm and relax people), antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders), and antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality).Findings included:- R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and drug induced dyskinesia (inability to execute voluntary movements)R27's 07/19/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded R27 took an antipsychotic, antidepressant,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents with three residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to issue written notification as soon as practicable for transfers, for Resident (R) 5, R9, and R50.Findings included:1. R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Nurses Note on 02/20/26 recorded R9 was observed vomiting a reddish-brown-colored substance. R9 reported pain in his right shoulder. The nurse received orders from the provider to send this resident to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation. R9 transferred to the hospital via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) on 02/20/26.R9's EMR lacked evidence the facility provided written notification of the transfer to R9 and/or his representative.2. R5's Progress Notes, dated 12/25/25 at 15:58 PM, documented that a verbal order was received to send to R5 to the ER for evaluation and treatment, and R5 was sent to the hospital via emergency medical services (EMS).R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked evidence the facility provided written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 65 residents; the sample included five residents reviewed unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to monitor and respond to Resident (R) 27's lack of bowel movements. Findings included:- R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and drug induced dyskinesia (inability to execute voluntary movements)R27's 07/19/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. R27 was always continent of bowel and did not have constipation.R27's Urinary Incontinence Care Area Assessment (CAA) triggered due to R27 needing assistance with toileting and toileting hygiene and was frequently incontinent of urine. Contributing factors included a cognitive communication deficit.R27's 01/19/26 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 65 residents; the sample included 16 residents which included one resident reviewed for communication-sensory. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary hearing treatments and failed to maintain the hearing devices for Resident (R) 21.Findings included:-R21's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and a need for assistance with personal care.R21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented R21 was independent for putting on his footwear. He needed supervision or touching assistance for bathing and required set-up or clean-up assistance for all other activities of daily living (ADL). The assessment also documented that R21 had highly impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 91 residents. The sample included 19 residents with one resident received for an intravenous catheter (IV-catheter placed in a vein to administer medications or fluids directly into the bloodstream). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide IV care and services consistent with standards of practice when staff did not assess, identify and take actions for Resident (R) 69's soiled IV dressing and failed to use adequate infection control practices during IV medication administration.Findings included: - R69's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI) and hypertension (high blood pressure).R69 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) was still in progress.R69's Care Plan, dated 02/20/26, instructed the Licensed Nurse (LN) to change the midline dressing every Thursday. The plan instructed staff to observe and report concerns of infection to the physician and administer prescribed medication per physician order. Staff were to monitor for signs and symptoms of infection, pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported when Resident (R) 3's antihypertensive medications were given outside of the physician ordered hold parameters.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid).R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. R3 was dependent on staff for her activities of daily living (ADLs). R3 received an anticoagulant (a class of medications sued to prevent the blood from clotting) and a diuretic (a class of medications sued to prevent the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff held Resident (R) 3's antihypertensive medications per physician's orders when R3's blood pressure (BP) and pulse measurements were outside of the physician ordered parameters.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid).R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated a moderately impaired cognition. R3 was dependent on staff for her activities of daily living (ADLs). R3 received an anticoagulant (a class of medications sued to prevent the blood from clotting) and a diuretic (a class of medications sued to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 65 residents. The sample included 16 residents with three sample residents reviewed for Hospice services. Based on record review and interview. The facility failed to ensure the collaboration of care between Resident (R) 7 and R50's hospice provider and the facility which included the hospice provider contact information, the services the hospice provider would provide to the residents, the supplies, equipment and medications the hospice provider would provide, as well as how often hospice staff members would visit the facility.Findings included:1. R7's Orders tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a physician's order, dated 01/06/26, for a referral for hospice services. The EMR lacked an order to admit to Hospice services.R7's Care Plan, dated 01/07/26, directed staff to adjust provision of activities of daily living (ADLs) to compensate for resident's changing abilities. The plan directed staff to encourage resident participation to the extent the resident wishes to participate. The plan directed staff to consult with physicians…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68. The sample included 4 residents in the sample for reviews of misappropriation of medications. Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from misappropriation of medications, when on 02/04/24 Licensed Nurse D removed R1's second card of three with 45 tablets of hydrocodone (medications used for pain) 10-325 milligrams (mg) from the facility. The deficient practice placed R1 at risk for missed medication, unrelieved pain, and further misappropriate of medications. Findings included: - The Physicians Orders date 03/4/25 for R1 revealed the following diagnosis paraplegia incomplete paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk) muscle spasms (involuntary contractions of a muscle) lupus (autoimmune disease is only condition hat causes the immune system believe the body's tissue are foreign pathogens and attacks the tissues) The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 64 residents. The facility identified one central kitchen with two satellite kitchens and two dining areas. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary food preparation and storage of food to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Initial tour of the kitchen on 04/09/24 at 09:05 AM with Dietary Staff H, revealed the following areas of concerns: 1. In the west kitchen, Dietary Staff Y performed tasks in the kitchen and had long hair exposed below the level of her buttocks with hair restraint device covering only the top of her head. 2. In the west kitchen, in the refrigerator, a bottle of orange juice with a factory expiration date of 09/29/23. 3. In the west kitchen, in the freezer, a package of hotdog buns unsealed and opened to air. 4. In the west kitchen freezer, a package of miscellaneous bread products unsealed and opened to air. 5. In the main kitchen food preparation area, four cutting boards with non-cleanable surfaces. 6. In the main…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of garbage and refuse properly in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings included: - Initial tour of the kitchen facilities on 04/09/24 at 09:50 AM with Dietary Staff H, revealed that the outside dumpster area was littered with medical waste that included soiled bandages and disposed gloves and that the dumpster lid was in the open position. On 04/09/24 at 09:53 AM, Dietary Staff H stated that she was unaware of the requirement that kitchen staff were responsible for the cleanliness of the area around the dumpster or that the dumpster lid was to always remain closed. On 04/09/24 at 09:58 AM, Administrative Nurse B stated that her expectation was for all staff that takes trash to the dumpster to ensure that the area around the dumpster is kept free of any debris and that the lid of the dumpster should be closed at all times. The presence of medical waste on the ground outside the dumpster was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 64 residents and identified 11 residents as confused and self-mobile. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards for these 11 residents, including failure to keep hazardous chemicals out of reach. Furthermore, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment when staff utilized a gait belt to secure Resident (R)1's door to remain in the open position. Findings included: - On 04/09/24 at 11:44 AM, observation revealed R1's room contained an unidentified, unlabeled spray bottle that hung from the foot of the bed. R1 identified the contents as a cleaning agent for staff use when staff emptied her catheter bag and if any urine spilled onto the floor. On 04/09/24 a 11:46 AM, observation of R1's bathroom revealed a bottle of Fabuloso cleaning agent with the manufacturer label documented Keep out of reach of children. The cleanser sat on the counter next to mouthwash and personal hygiene products. On 04/10/24 at 10:13 AM, observation of R1's bathroom revealed a bottle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - Resident (R) 25's diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), and urinary tract infection (Infection of any part of the urinary system, including kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident was dependent for all cares and had an indwelling urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). The 11/03/23 Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 11/03/23, revealed the resident required a urinary catheter. The care plan, dated 10/13/23, revealed the resident required a urinary catheter. Revision of the care plan revealed on 04/10/2024, the resident required Enhanced Based Precautions (EBP) related to wound and catheter. Staff were to wear gloves and gowns for all dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents and identified 11 residents as confused and self-mobile. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed provide a safe environment for 11 residents by the failure to ensure that Resident (R)25 and R1's rooms remained free of unsecured medications, when the facility failed to secure medications in both residents' rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to create an accidental ingestion of medications to these confused, mobile residents. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for Resident (R)25 included diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, reduced mobility, incomplete paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk) and muscle wasting with atrophy (wasting or decrease in size of a part of the body). R25's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R25 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 64 residents. The facility identified one central kitchen with two satellite kitchens and two dining areas. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Findings included: - On 04/11/24 at 09:00 AM, test trays were requested from Dietary Staff H for the noon meal service, one from each of the satellite kitchens. On 04/11/24 at 12:24 PM Dietary Staff H provided surveyors with a meal tray from the west kitchen with all foods measured by Dietary Staff H above appropriate temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) for food service. All foods were sampled for palatability, and all were acceptable except for the tater-tots which tasted stale and freezer burnt. On 04/11/24 at 12:48 PM Dietary Staff Z provided surveyors with a meal tray from the east kitchen with all foods measured by Dietary Staff Z. The tater-tots measured at 130.9 °F and popcorn shrimp measured at 132 °F. Dietary Staff Z stated that all foods were to be served at 135°F or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents which included 16 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and safe environment to prevent cross contamination and infection related to provision appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for 13 residents (R)1, R 4, R 11, R 19, R 25, R 26, R 37, R 38, R 40, R 48, R 50, R 55, and R 57, which required enhanced barrier precautions to be in place and available for nine residents with catheters (R 1, R 26, R 11, R 55, R19, R 37, R 50, R 04, R 25), five residents with wounds (R 38, R 40, R 19, R 50, and R 25), two residents with percutaneous enteral gastrostomy tube (PEG- artificial opening through the abdominal wall where a catheter is placed to supply nutrition), (R 37 and R 48), four residents (R 55, R 38, R 48, and R 57 of the 13 identified residents that required enhanced barrier precautions during care received therapy. Additionally, the facility failed to provide safe and sanitary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents that included 16 residents sampled. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain Resident (R)20's dignity when staff talked to the resident in a demeaning manner, for R25, when staff failed to close a window when providing incontinence cares, and for R50, that failed to cover the resident's urinary catheter collection bag when in public view. Findings included: - The undated Physician Orders, for Resident (R)20 documented diagnoses which included cognitive communication deficit, cerebral vascular accident (stroke is a sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), traumatic brain injury, repeated falls, fractures (broken bones) and other multiple traumas. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the resident with a Brief Mental Status Interview, (BIMS) score of 13, indicating cognitively intact. The resident did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 64 residents, which included 16 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs related to assistive devices. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)11's call light remained within his reach. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for Resident (R)11 included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2 - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), generalized weakness, aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA - a chronic inflammatory disease that affected joints and other organ systems). The 12/23/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates intact cognition. R11 required substantial assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents which included 16 residents sampled for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to track grievances through to their conclusions and provide prompt efforts to resolve a grievance filed by a resident (R)20 regarding the behavior of staff, offer or provide written grievance decisions to the resident regarding his or her grievance, and to offer or provide a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance. Findings included: - The undated Physician Orders, for Resident (R)20 documented diagnoses which included cognitive communication deficit, cerebral vascular accident (stroke is a sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), traumatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents which included 16 residents sampled, which included two residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan development. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, individualized person-centered care plan for Resident (R) 25 related to the use of grab bar use for bed mobility and for R27 to include the use of oxygen and oxygen related equipment. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings include: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for Resident (R)25 included diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, reduced mobility, incomplete paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk) and muscle wasting with atrophy (wasting or decrease in size of a part of the body). R25's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents with 16 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to decrease the risk of a urinary tract infection when staff failed to use proper hand hygiene and Enhanced Barrier precautions (EBP) when providing urinary catheter care for resident (R)1 and R25. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses that included acute kidney failure (a sudden decline in kidney function that occurs within a few hours or days), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the bladder from fully emptying), and urinary tract infection ([UTI] infection of any part of the urinary system, including kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra). R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents with 16 residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to properly clean and store a nebulizer (a device for administering inhaled medications) for Resident (R)28 and R11 in accordance with the standards of care. In addition, the facility failed to place a date label on the oxygen tubing for R27. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of respiratory complications that could also have a negative impact on the resident's psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - R28's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented pertinent diagnoses of atherosclerotic (buildup of plaques in the blood vessels) heart disease, history of pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the blood vessels of the lungs), asthma (a chronic disorder of narrowed airways that caused wheezing and shortness of breath), generalized weakness, difficulty in walking and respiratory failure (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents which included 16 residents sampled, which included one resident reviewed for bed rail safety. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to assess Resident (R)25 for safety and risk of entrapment from bed rail use and failed to ensure R25 obtained informed documented consent from the resident or resident representative prior to installation of the siderails. This deficient practice placed R25 at a risk for uninformed decisions related to the risks and benefits associated with the use of side rails and placed the resident at risk due to possible injury due to bed rail use. Findings include: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) for Resident (R)25 included diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, reduced mobility, incomplete paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk) and muscle wasting with atrophy (wasting or decrease in size of a part of the body). R25's Significant Change Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 67 residents, with three residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure a safe environment on 11/20/23, when the facility sent cognitively impaired dependent Resident (R)1 to R2's medical appointment. The facility mixed up R2 and R1's identity and dropped off R1 at the front doors of a medical clinic, alone, for R2's appointment. R1 did not have any identification on him and did not know why he was at the appointment. The facility did not know R1 was out of the facility until the medical clinic staff called the facility to point out the facility dropped off the incorrect resident. Finding included: - The Physician Orders for R1, dated 10/18/23, revealed a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit (difficult recalling short-term or long-term information). The Significant Change of Status Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 59 residents who resided in the facility and received their food from the facility kitchen and two kitchenettes, when staff failed to use safe food handling, failed to dispose of expired food items, failed to disinfect a thermometer between food items when checking the temperatures of the food, and failed to wear a hair net in the kitchen during the preparation a meal. Findings included: - On 06/21/22 at 08:18 AM, observation revealed the kitchen freezer had the following undated or expired food items: 1/2 bag of French fries 1/4 bag of French fries 1/4 bag of chicken strips 1/4 bag of tater tots On 06/22/22 at 11:10 AM, observation revealed in the kitchen, during the preparation of the noon meal, Dietary Staff (DS) CC without a hair net. On 06/21/22 at 08:10 AM, DS BB verified the items in the kitchen freezer and discarded the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to treat Resident (R) 4 and R16 with dignity when staff checked their blood pressure (test measures the pressure in your arteries as your heart pumps) and administered their insulin (a medication used to regulate blood sugar levels) at the dining room table, with nine other residents able to view them during meal service and dining. The staff also failed to close the bedroom curtain to promote dignity and privacy, while R8 sat on a bed pan. Findings included: - On 06/22/22 at 08:10 AM, observation revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G checked R4's and R16's blood pressure and administered their insulin at the dining room table with nine other residents able to view the procedures. On 06/22/22 at 08:12 AM, LN G stated sometimes she checked R4 and R16's blood pressure and administered their insulin at the dining room table because they wanted her too. On 06/27/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy, when R18 transferred to the hospital. This placed R18 at risk for not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), muscle weakness, and altered mental status (state of awareness that was different from the normal awareness of a person). R18's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 59. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care in a timely manner for Resident (R) 54 when facility staff did not answer her call light (used to request assistance) for 28 minutes. This deficient practice placed R54 at risk to not have care or assistance in a timely manner. Findings included: - R54's Physician Oder Sheet, dated 06/21/22, included diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke, sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), diabetes mellitus (condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), meningitis (infection of meninges, protective tissue of the brain that causes stiff neck, headache and fever), and myopathy (disorders in which the primary symptom is muscle weakness due to dysfunction of muscle fiber). The Care Plan, dated 06/12/22, directed staff to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, ensure her call light remained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two reviewed for pain. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide interventions during wound care to manage Resident (R) 2's distress and pain. This placed the resident at risk for prolonged and unnecessary pain or distress. Findings included: - R2's Physician Order Sheet dated 06/21/22, included diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension), diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hyponatremia (greater than normal concentration of sodium in the blood), and right-side hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/21/22, documented R2 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS further documented the resident had no skin issues, and received scheduled pain medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for dialysis (blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain communication from the dialysis center regarding Resident (R) 33's health status with each procedure. This deficient practice placed R33 at risk for unmet needs due to lack of information regarding the resident's health status during the dialysis procedures. Findings included: - R33's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 06/21/22, documented diagnoses of end stage renal disease (condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident was independent with eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow up on the Consultant Pharmacist request for an appropriate diagnosis for the use of Seroquel, an antipsychotic (a drug used to treat psychotic disorders) medication for Resident (R) 13. This deficient practice placed R13 at risk for adverse effects related to the use of antipsychotic medication. Findings included: - R13's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 06/16/22, documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), atherosclerosis (condition where the arteries become narrowed and hardened due to buildup of plaque (fats), dementia (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), vertigo (sense of spinning experienced even when someone is perfectly still), myoclonus (spasmodic jerky contraction of groups of muscles), hallucinations (experience in which you see, hear, feel, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 13 did not receive antipsychotic (a drug used to treat psychotic disorders) medication without an appropriate diagnosis. This deficient practice placed R13 at risk for adverse effects related to the use of antipsychotic medication. Findings included: - R13's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 06/16/22, documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), atherosclerosis (condition where the arteries become narrowed and hardened due to buildup of plaque (fats), dementia (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), vertigo (sense of spinning experienced even when someone is perfectly still), myoclonus (spasmodic jerky contraction of groups of muscles), hallucinations (experience in which you see, hear, feel, or smell something that does not exist), metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide thorough infection control during a wound dressing change for Resident (R) 21 and failed to update their Infection Control policies annually. This deficient practice placed R21 at increased risk for infection. Findings included: - On 06/22/22 at 10:55 AM, observation revealed R21 laid in bed, on his right side. Licensed Nurse (LN) GG placed a clean bed pad under R21's left leg and unwrapped the wound dressing. The gauze wound dressing had a large amount red/yellow drainage, with slough (dead tissue). After LN GG removed the soiled wound dressings and her gloves, she washed her hands and applied new gloves. LN GG set the wound care supplies on the bedside table without first cleaning or disinfecting the table and she did not place a clean towel on the contaminated surface. Observation revealed the same bedside table held a urinal with dark yellow fluid and an empty, used urinal. On 06/22/22 at 11:05 AM, LN GG verified she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-27 · tag F0920 — isolatedProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide sufficient space in one of two dining areas to accommodate residents' needs. Findings included: - On 06/21/22 at 11:57 AM, observation in the east dining room revealed residents seated at dining room tables, other residents entered the dining room, some with wheelchairs, others with walkers, and staff moved residents away from their tables so other residents entering could get to the tables for the noon meal. On 06/22/22 at 11:30 AM, observation revealed residents seated at the dining room tables. The staff had to move residents currently seated at the dining room tables, away from their tables, so other residents could get to the tables for the noon meal. On 06/27/22 at 02:04 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she could see how the east dining room was crowded and they needed to try to rearrange the tables to make more room, because not all of the residents on that end come out for dining at this time. On 6/27/22 at 03:31 PM, Administrative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-02-25 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing sheets included accurate and identifiable information to include the actual hours worked, as required.Findings included:- Observed on 02/23/26 at 08:00 AM, the posted staffing sheet lacked the actual hours workedObserved on 02/24/26 at 07:30 AM, the posted staffing sheet lacked the actual hours worked.Review of the daily staffing sheets from 12/21/24 and 07/21/25 revealed that the staffing sheets lacked the actual hours worked.On 02/24/26 at 09:47 AM, Administrative Staff A stated that the staffing coordinator, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R, had been responsible for the posting and accuracy of the daily staffing sheets.On 02/24/26 at 09:57 AM, CMA R stated that she had provided the staffing numbers to the receptionist and the receptionist then printed the daily staffing sheet and posted it in the lobby. CMA R verified that the actual hours worked had not been listed on the posted daily staffing sheets.On 02/24/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-06-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual scheduled working hours for nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. Findings included: - On 06/21/22 at 08:00 AM, upon entrance into the facility, observation revealed the facility lacked a Daily Nurse Staffing Report posted in the facility. On 06/22/22 at 07:30 AM, observation revealed the facility lacked a Daily Nurse Staffing Report posted in the facility. On 06/23/22 at 07:30 AM, observation revealed the facility lacked a Daily Nurse Staffing Report posted in the facility. On 06/23/22 at 09:30 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility had not posted the Daily Nurse Staffing Report since her employment at the facility. Administrative Staff A verified she was told the facility no longer needed to post the staffing and it was not a requirement. The facility's Posting Direct Care Daily Staff Numbers policy, dated 07/2016, documented the facility would post, daily for each shift, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AZRIA HEALTH — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 1.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 1.8 | +2.2 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WICHITA AZ OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2021 |
| BCP IOWA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2021 |
| HORNUNG, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2021 |
| KAMINER, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2021 |
| BLUMA, DARCY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| AZW OPCO MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175563. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.